12
Reducing Infant Mortality: Welcome and Observations Presented to the 2010-11 Maternal and Child Health Interprofessional Course: Exposing Infant Mortality: High Hopes in Baby Steps University of Maryland School of Social Work January 8, 2011 Richard P. Barth, PhD, MSW Professor and Dean

Presented to the 2010-11 Maternal and Child Health Interprofessional Course: Exposing Infant Mortality: High Hopes in Baby Steps University of Maryland

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Brief Introduction To … Safe Haven Laws & Campaigns (giving parents a penalty-free chance to relinquish their children) Purple Crying (getting commitment not to shake your child) Birth Match (assuming a longer term family perspective to child safety) Alternative/Differential Response (voluntary child welfare services)

Citation preview

Page 1: Presented to the 2010-11 Maternal and Child Health Interprofessional Course: Exposing Infant Mortality: High Hopes in Baby Steps University of Maryland

Reducing Infant Mortality: Welcome and Observations

Presented to the 2010-11 Maternal and Child Health Interprofessional Course:

Exposing Infant Mortality: High Hopes in Baby StepsUniversity of Maryland School of Social Work

January 8, 2011 

Richard P. Barth, PhD, MSWProfessor and Dean

Page 2: Presented to the 2010-11 Maternal and Child Health Interprofessional Course: Exposing Infant Mortality: High Hopes in Baby Steps University of Maryland

The Conundrum of Multiply Determined ProblemsIf there are many reasons for a problem what

is the basis for picking any reason to addressEffective: the determinant has been addressed

elsewhere with resultsConvenient: Protocols and resources are

availableScalable: The approach can build to something

more broadly beneficial Also reduce morbidity Also assist families with older children

Page 3: Presented to the 2010-11 Maternal and Child Health Interprofessional Course: Exposing Infant Mortality: High Hopes in Baby Steps University of Maryland

Brief Introduction To …Safe Haven Laws & Campaigns (giving

parents a penalty-free chance to relinquish their children)

Purple Crying (getting commitment not to shake your child)

Birth Match (assuming a longer term family perspective to child safety)

Alternative/Differential Response (voluntary child welfare services)

Page 4: Presented to the 2010-11 Maternal and Child Health Interprofessional Course: Exposing Infant Mortality: High Hopes in Baby Steps University of Maryland

now there’s a wayto safely surrenderyour baby

Page 5: Presented to the 2010-11 Maternal and Child Health Interprofessional Course: Exposing Infant Mortality: High Hopes in Baby Steps University of Maryland

Safe Haven Laws II

How many days do you have in Maryland to surrender your baby?What should the number be?

How many places are “safe haven” safe for surrendersWhat other places should be?

Are there limitations regarding who can surrender (must it be the mother or father)?Is that optimal?

What partnerships do we need to have to improve Safe Haven implementation?

Page 6: Presented to the 2010-11 Maternal and Child Health Interprofessional Course: Exposing Infant Mortality: High Hopes in Baby Steps University of Maryland

Period of PURPLE Crying® Peaks: Crying peaks at two to three months of age

and ends at four to five months. Unexpected: Crying is often unexpected. Resists soothing: Infants may be resistant to

soothing. Pain-like Face: Infants may appear to be in

pain. Long-lasting: The crying is usually long-lasting. Evening: Crying occurs most frequently in the

evening.

Page 7: Presented to the 2010-11 Maternal and Child Health Interprofessional Course: Exposing Infant Mortality: High Hopes in Baby Steps University of Maryland

Purple Crying IINorth Carolina is committed to reaching every

parent, relative, and friend of the parents with a newbornNurses and doctors at 86 hospitals in NC are

showing the DVC (about shaken baby syndrome and alternative soothing techniques)

Commitment not to shake a babyMedia campaign follow up at post-natal visits

Is there enough evidence to justify this expense?What partnerships would we need to implement

a Purple Crying campaign

Page 8: Presented to the 2010-11 Maternal and Child Health Interprofessional Course: Exposing Infant Mortality: High Hopes in Baby Steps University of Maryland

Birth Match I

New birth certificates are matched against DSS (child welfare) records indicating that parent had previously experienced “termination of parental rights” (determined by the courts based on clear and convincing evidence that the parent cannot safely care for the child.)

If a child is born to a mother who has previously been shown to have a TPR within 5 years, the LDSS will visit the child in order to assess whether the child’s current situation is safe or whether a report to CWS should be made

Maryland is among national leaders… should it go farther?

Page 9: Presented to the 2010-11 Maternal and Child Health Interprofessional Course: Exposing Infant Mortality: High Hopes in Baby Steps University of Maryland

Birth Match IIShould new births to parents who have children in foster

care (even if they have not had a TPR) become the basis for a match and investigation? (NYC)

Should new births to fathers who have had TPRs or who have had violent felonies or who are sex offenders be matched and reported for investigation? (Michigan)

Should there be a presumption that the newborn would not stay in the home unless there is administrative review at a high level (NYC, MI)

What partnerships are needed to generate improvements in Birth Match implementation?

Page 10: Presented to the 2010-11 Maternal and Child Health Interprofessional Course: Exposing Infant Mortality: High Hopes in Baby Steps University of Maryland

Alternative/Differential Response

Children referred to CWS are, typically, sent down one of three paths: (1) no services; (2) court ordered in –home services; (3) court ordered foster care

Many states are implementing an “alternative response” which is a voluntary program of in-home services for less serious cases

Maryland has tried to implement this for the last 4 years with no success (authorized by the legislature but not funded by DHR)

Page 11: Presented to the 2010-11 Maternal and Child Health Interprofessional Course: Exposing Infant Mortality: High Hopes in Baby Steps University of Maryland

Alternative/Differential Response II• Children who are referred to CWS are

at elevated risk of death before age 5• Children evaluated out (i.e., they received

no ongoing services) were fatally injured at 2.5 times (adjusted) the rate of unreported children

• One-third of all children who died from intentional injuries had prior CWS involvement

Who do we need to involve to see that Maryland’s families have a chance to receive additional services?

Source: Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD., MSW. (2010). Do “Accidents” Happen? An Examination of Injury Mortality Among Maltreated Children. Berkeley, CA: University of California, School of Social Welfare.

Page 12: Presented to the 2010-11 Maternal and Child Health Interprofessional Course: Exposing Infant Mortality: High Hopes in Baby Steps University of Maryland

SummaryMany interventions are not strongly evidence-

basedBut prototypes for them do exist and

Partnerships are needed if we are going to achieve hoped for implementation and outcomes

Interprofessional education will certainly help you identify a range of options and partnerships.YOU ARE ON THE WAY TO MAKING A BIG

DIFFERENCE FOR A FEW AND, POTENTIALLY, FOR MANY

GOOD LUCK!