20
Working Paper: (not DBA research) Views of Local Government Officials on Electronic Procurement in Thailand Presented at Customized Study Program (30 March – April 24, 2009) Facilitators: Professor Helene Thorne & Associate Professor Galvin Sanderson by Gamon Savatsomboon (DBA Intake 1) University of South Australia International Graduate School of Business

Presented at Customized Study Program (30 March – April 24, 2009)

  • Upload
    leland

  • View
    18

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

University of South Australia International Graduate School of Business. Working Paper: (not DBA research) Views of Local Government Officials on Electronic Procurement in Thailand. Presented at Customized Study Program (30 March – April 24, 2009) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 2: Presented at Customized Study Program (30 March – April 24, 2009)

Savatsomboon, G. 2004, Student Loan Financing in the University Sector in Thailand, International Higher Education, No. 35, Spring 2004, The Boston College Center for International Higher Education, The United States of America (USA).***

Savatsomboon, G., Wilkinson, A., and Pratoom, K. 2009, A Conceptual Model: The Effects of International Banks Business Strategy on Local Employees Motivation and Performance, International Journal of Strategic Management (in press), Academic of International Business and Economics (IABE) (Greece).

Savatsomboon, G. 2008, Executive Views: Contributing Factors to International Business Alliance Success in the Hotel Industry in Thailand, International Journal of Business Research, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 156 – 162, Academy of International Business and Economics (IABE) (USA).

Savatsomboon, G. 2006, The Liberalization of Thai Higher Education: Point of No Return, International Higher Education, No. 42, Winter 2006, The Boston College Center for International Higher Education, The United States of America (USA).

Savatsomboon, G. 2005, Corss-border Education in Thailand: An Analysis based upon GATS Modes of Supply, Vol. 11, No. 3, October 2005, IAU Horizon, International Association of Universities (AIU), UNESCO House (France).

University of South AustraliaInternational Graduate School of Business

My DBA Portfolio & International Publication

DBA Portfolio Title:

Privatization in the Thai Public Sector Economy: A Case Study of Thai Government Universities Dealing with Privatization and University Autonomy of the Government University Sector in Thailand (5 research papers) ***

Page 4: Presented at Customized Study Program (30 March – April 24, 2009)

Electronic Government Procurement Process in Thailand

University of South AustraliaInternational Graduate School of Business

Local governments(over 2 millions Bahts)

(อบต.)

→ Comptroller’s General Department

(Central government)

→ eMarket Place → Contract&

Delivery

Suppliers

Electronic Government Procurement ProcessNotes for eMarket Place: 1) Provincial Finance Office = Auction house (only provide the facility)2) Service providers = Private companies, Facilitators, Software

Page 5: Presented at Customized Study Program (30 March – April 24, 2009)

University of South AustraliaInternational Graduate School of Business

Local government(Government Officials)

Comptroller’s General Department(Central government)

E-Procurement Service Provider (Software)Provincial Finance Office (Auction house)

ContractProducts & Service Delivery

Sellers

Key players & E-procurement process

( Area 1 )

( Area 2 )

( Area 3 )

( Area 4 )

( Area 3 )

Page 6: Presented at Customized Study Program (30 March – April 24, 2009)

INTRODUCTION

• WHY ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT? - e.g. Cost savings & transparency

• PURPOSE OF THIS RESEARCHThe purpose of this research is to examine the views of local government officials on 4 critical areas:

1) eProcurement procedures (e.g. website )2) eMarket Place (e.g. software)3) Suppliers (e.g. services & products)4) Transparency (e.g. collusion)

University of South AustraliaInternational Graduate School of Business

Page 11: Presented at Customized Study Program (30 March – April 24, 2009)

FINDINGS (Quantitative evaluation)

1) eProcurement procedures (Mean = 4.05) 2) eMarket Place (Mean = 3.67) 3) Suppliers (Mean = 3.43) 4) Transparency (Mean = 2.00)

Note: 5.00 = Excellent, 1.00 = Poor

University of South AustraliaInternational Graduate School of Business

Page 14: Presented at Customized Study Program (30 March – April 24, 2009)

CONCLUSION & IMPLICATIONS

1) eProcurement procedures 2) eMarket Place 3) Suppliers 4) Transparency

Managerial implication: Thai government needs to find ways to solve transparency problems.

University of South AustraliaInternational Graduate School of Business

Page 18: Presented at Customized Study Program (30 March – April 24, 2009)

Research article title:Views of Local Government Officials on

Electronic Procurement in Thailand

Presented atCustomized Study Program (30 March – April 24, 2009)

Facilitators: Professor Helene Thorne & Associate Professor Galvin Sanderson

byGamon Savatsomboon (DBA Intake 1)

University of South AustraliaInternational Graduate School of Business

Q & A

Page 19: Presented at Customized Study Program (30 March – April 24, 2009)

THANK YOU FOR YOUR KIND ATTENTION

University of South AustraliaInternational Graduate School of Business

Page 20: Presented at Customized Study Program (30 March – April 24, 2009)

MANY THANKS TO IGSB, UniSA

Good luck to you allDBA 1 to 11

University of South AustraliaInternational Graduate School of Business