1

Click here to load reader

Presentation rubric

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Presentation rubric

EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE FAIR

INTRODUCTION Introduction to presentation explains who isbeing presented, how they conducted theinterview and the way that they will bepresenting and why

Short introduction, but does set up whois being presented.

Introduction does not relate topresentation.

No introduction topresentation.

QUALITY OF INFORMATION Information clearly represents the interviewincluding major events and details of theirlife.

Information represents the interview butpresentation did not include majorevents or small details of their life.

Information represents the interviewbut missing major events anddetails.

Information did not have anymajor events or details ofthe interview.

CONTENT DEPTH -COMPLEXITY

Precise data; in-depth; well supported;develops complex concepts andrelationships, beyond expected level;analyzes multiple perspectives and issues,abstract thinking.

Covers topic effectively; well developed;explores the topic beyond facts anddetails; critical thinking evident;compares and contrasts.

Valid content but little depth orelaboration; sparse information andpresentation, simple, basicinformation; limited critical thinkingis evident.

Needs more information ormore accurate information,information was insufficientor irrelevant, very simple.

VISUAL AIDS Visual aids were used, were legible andrelevant to the interviewee and were of highquality

Visual aids used were legible andrelevant to topic/interviewee

Visual aids were not legible or didnot relate to the interview

No visual aids

COOPERATION Works well with partner. Sharing and usingothers ideas. Equal time given to bothpresenters. This will be evaluated throughyour individual summaries which highlightsthe work that your partner you have eachcontributed.

Worked well together and shared ideas,but one did most of the presenting.This will be evaluated through yourindividual summaries which highlightsthe work that your partner you haveeach contributed.

Somewhat cooperative, but stillseemed to do it their own way. Thiswill be evaluated through yourindividual summaries whichhighlights the work that your partneryou have each contributed.

Completely un-cooperative.This will be evaluatedthrough your individualsummaries which highlightsthe work that your partneryou have each contributed.