EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE FAIR INTRODUCTION Introduction to presentation explains who is being presented, how they conducted the interview and the way that they will be presenting and why Short introduction, but does set up who is being presented. Introduction does not relate to presentation. No introduction to presentation. QUALITY OF INFORMATION Information clearly represents the interview including major events and details of their life. Information represents the interview but presentation did not include major events or small details of their life. Information represents the interview but missing major events and details. Information did not have any major events or details of the interview. CONTENT DEPTH - COMPLEXITY Precise data; in-depth; well supported; develops complex concepts and relationships, beyond expected level; analyzes multiple perspectives and issues, abstract thinking. Covers topic effectively; well developed; explores the topic beyond facts and details; critical thinking evident; compares and contrasts. Valid content but little depth or elaboration; sparse information and presentation, simple, basic information; limited critical thinking is evident. Needs more information or more accurate information, information was insufficient or irrelevant, very simple. VISUAL AIDS Visual aids were used, were legible and relevant to the interviewee and were of high quality Visual aids used and were legible and relevant to topic/interviewee Visual aids were not legible or did not relate to the interview No visual aids COOPERATION Works well with partner. Sharing and using others ideas. Equal time given to both presenters. This will be evaluated through your individual summaries which highlights the work that your partner you have each contributed. Worked well together and shared ideas, but one did most of the presenting. This will be evaluated through your individual summaries which highlights the work that your partner you have each contributed. Somewhat cooperative, but still seemed to do it their own way. This will be evaluated through your individual summaries which highlights the work that your partner you have each contributed. Completely un-cooperative. This will be evaluated through your individual summaries which highlights the work that your partner you have each contributed. Presentation Rubric

Presentation rubric

Download PDF Report

Upload
tonysafyc
View
23
Download
1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE FAIR

INTRODUCTION Introduction to presentation explains who isbeing presented, how they conducted theinterview and the way that they will bepresenting and why

Short introduction, but does set up whois being presented.

Introduction does not relate topresentation.

No introduction topresentation.

QUALITY OF INFORMATION Information clearly represents the interviewincluding major events and details of theirlife.

Information represents the interview butpresentation did not include majorevents or small details of their life.

Information represents the interviewbut missing major events anddetails.

Information did not have anymajor events or details ofthe interview.

CONTENT DEPTH -COMPLEXITY

Precise data; in-depth; well supported;develops complex concepts andrelationships, beyond expected level;analyzes multiple perspectives and issues,abstract thinking.

Covers topic effectively; well developed;explores the topic beyond facts anddetails; critical thinking evident;compares and contrasts.

Valid content but little depth orelaboration; sparse information andpresentation, simple, basicinformation; limited critical thinkingis evident.

Needs more information ormore accurate information,information was insufficientor irrelevant, very simple.

VISUAL AIDS Visual aids were used, were legible andrelevant to the interviewee and were of highquality

Visual aids used and were legible andrelevant to topic/interviewee

Visual aids were not legible or didnot relate to the interview

No visual aids

COOPERATION Works well with partner. Sharing and usingothers ideas. Equal time given to bothpresenters. This will be evaluated throughyour individual summaries which highlightsthe work that your partner you have eachcontributed.

Worked well together and shared ideas,but one did most of the presenting.This will be evaluated through yourindividual summaries which highlightsthe work that your partner you haveeach contributed.

Somewhat cooperative, but stillseemed to do it their own way. Thiswill be evaluated through yourindividual summaries whichhighlights the work that your partneryou have each contributed.

Completely un-cooperative.This will be evaluatedthrough your individualsummaries which highlightsthe work that your partneryou have each contributed.

Presentation Rubric