Upload
ritika-ritz
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/25/2019 Presentation on Rule of Law
1/18
NAME RITIKA RITU
REGD. NO. 1141844001
YEAR 2011-2016
PRESENTATION ON RULE OF LAW
7/25/2019 Presentation on Rule of Law
2/18
RULE OF LAWIn questions of power, then, let no more be said of
confidence in man but bind him down from his own
mischief by the chains of the Constitution
7/25/2019 Presentation on Rule of Law
3/18
Defii!i"
Rule of law is the supreme manifestation of human
civilization and culture is a new lingua franca of global
moral thought! It is an eternal value of constitutionalism
and inherent attribute of democracy and good governance!
"he term Rule of #aw is derived from the $rench phrase
la principle de legalite %the principle of legality& which
refers to a government based on principles of law and not
of men!
7/25/2019 Presentation on Rule of Law
4/18
Rule of law is a legal principle that law should govern a
nation, and not arbitrary decisions by individual
government officials!
In simple words men are ruled by law and not by men!
It primarily refers to the influence and authority of law
within society, particularly as a constrain upon behavior,including behavior of government officials
7/25/2019 Presentation on Rule of Law
5/18
#ISTORY OF RULE OF LAW
' principle that itself is quite old and long predates the (nited
)tates, the rule of law is the general concept that government as
well as the governed are sub*ect to the law and that all are to be
equally protected by the law! Its roots can be found in classicalantiquity!
In (+, )ir dward co-e is said to be the originator of this
concept, when he said that the -ing must be under the god and law
and thus vindicated the supremacy of law over the pretensions of
the e.ecutives!
In India, the concept of Rule of law can be traced to (panishad! It
provides that the law is the -ing of -ings! It is more powerful and
rigid than the -ings!
7/25/2019 Presentation on Rule of Law
6/18
DI$EY%S $ON$EPT
In his boo- #aw / the Constitutionpublished in the year 0112, 3icey
attributed 4 meaning of Rule of #aw5
0! )upremacy of law
6! quality before the law
4! 7redominance of legal spirit
7/25/2019 Presentation on Rule of Law
7/18
$&i!i'i() !" Di'e*%( R+,e "f ,
3iceys first principle %supremacy of regular law asopposed to the influence of arbitrary power& has been
seriously challenged, due to the proposition that the
rule of law e.cludes even wide discretionary authority
by the government!
3iceys second meaning stresses the equal sub*ection
of all persons to the ordinary law! 8hat a
constitutional guarantee of equality before law mayachieve is to enable legislation to be invalidated
which discriminates between citizens on grounds that
are considered irrelevant, unacceptable or offensive!
7/25/2019 Presentation on Rule of Law
8/18
3iceys third meaning of the rule of law e.pressed a
strong preference for the principles of common law
declared by the *udges as the basis of the citizens
rights and liberties! $irst, fundamental liberties at
common law may be eroded by 7arliament and thusacquire a residual character! )econdly, the common
law does not assure the citizens economic and social
well9being! "hird, while it remains essential that legal
remedies are effective, there is value in a declarationof the individuals basic rights and in creating *udicial
procedures for protecting those rights
7/25/2019 Presentation on Rule of Law
9/18
E((e!i,( "f R+,e "f L
/ A#ORREN$E OF ARITRARY POWER
/ EUALITY EFORE T#E LAW
'/ A FORMAL3 RATIONAL $OURT SYSTEM
/ 5UDI$IAL INDEPENDEN$E AND SEPARATION OF
POWERS
7/25/2019 Presentation on Rule of Law
10/18
F'!"&( "f R+,e "f L
Rule of #aw is a system where the following
principles are upheld5
0! Constraints on :overnment 7owers
6! 'bsence of corruption
4! ;rder and )ecurity
2! ;pen :overnment
=! Regulatory nforcement>! Civil and Criminal ?ustice
1! Informal ?ustice
7/25/2019 Presentation on Rule of Law
11/18
$")&i7 Diffe&e! $"+!&ie(
In ()', rights are e.pressly mentioned and hence Rule of #aw
e.ists!
$ollowing the philosophical and political thoughts of ?ohn #oc-e and
"homas ?efferson, the law of the (nited )tates incorporates the most
radical principles of individualism and liberty ever -nown to man!
"hese principles, proclaimed in the 'merican 3eclaration of
Independence, were inserted in the 7reamble of the (!)! Constitution
and provide that people have certain fundamental and inherent rightssuch as life, liberty, property ownership, and the pursuit of happiness!
"hese rights have been endowed by nature and :od, and not by
government!
7/25/2019 Presentation on Rule of Law
12/18
In (+, ?udge made law, evolved and the principles of
rule of law are recognised by the Courts!
"he root of development of Rule of #aw is tracedbac- in the :reat Charter ie @agna Carta!
8inston Churchill concludes that Aow for the first
time the -ing himself is bound by the law!
"here is a law which is above the -ing and which
even he must not brea-! "his reaffirmation of a
supreme law and its e.pression in a general charter is
a great wor- of @agna CartaB and this alone *ustifiesthe respect in which men have held it!
7/25/2019 Presentation on Rule of Law
13/18
In India the term Rule of #aw is not used in the Indian
Constitution anywhere! "he term is though frequently
used by the Indian Courts in their *udgments!"he fundamental rights embodied in the Indian
constitution in terms virtually identical term to the
universal declaration of human rights act as guarantee
that all Indian citizens can and will lead their lives inpeace as long as they obey the law!
India has a written constitutionB a body of laws,
subordinate to the constitution, dealing with varioussub*ectsB rules and regulations, e.ecutive instructions
/ Conventions! 'll these may be broadly termed as
law and their operation to sub*ect population is the
Rule of Law.
7/25/2019 Presentation on Rule of Law
14/18
P&""f "f ei(!e'e "f R+,e "f L i Ii
7roof5)eparation of powers
$undamental Rights
?udicial Independence
?udicial review
quality :uarantee / 7rotection of uman Rights
7/25/2019 Presentation on Rule of Law
15/18
5UDI$IAL ANALYSIS
In Murray v. Hoboken Land3 "he (!)! )upreme Courtheld in 0122, that in order to determine whether a
process is due process the first step is to e.amine the
Constitution itself, to see whether this process be in
conflict with any of its provisionsInSolesBee v. Balkcom,it was held that 3ue process is
violated if a practice of rule offends some principle of
*ustice so routed in the traditions and conscience of ourpeople as to be ran-ed fundamental! 44D (!)! D, 0=
%0D2E&!
7/25/2019 Presentation on Rule of Law
16/18
In Ii& G9i :. R; N&i3
'rticle 46D9' was inserted in the Constitution under
4Dth 'mendment, which provided certain immunitiesto the election of office of 7rime @inister from
?udicial Review! "he )upreme Court declared 46D9'
as invalid since it abridges the basic structure of the
Constitution!
In '9 Si79 : Ui" "f Ii
Fhagwati ?! said rule of law e.cludes arbitrarinessand unreasonableness!
7/25/2019 Presentation on Rule of Law
17/18
In Ke(: 9&!i : S!!e "f Ke&, 3
)cope of Rule of #aw has been e.panded in ?udiciary
in this landmar- *udgment which held that Rule of#aw is a part of basic structure of the Indian
Constitution and therefore it cannot be abrogated or
destroyed even by the 7arliament!
InD.S Nakara v. union of India, in this case supreme
court said that Rule 4< of the central services% pension&
rules, 0D>6 as unconstitutional on the ground that the
classification made by it between pensioners retiringbefore a certain date and retiring after that date was
not depend upon the any rational principal it was
arbitrary and the infringement of article of article 0< of
Indian constitution law!
7/25/2019 Presentation on Rule of Law
18/18
$ON$LUSION
8ith the above analysis of the concept in (+ as well as in India it can
be concluded that the 3iceys Concept of Rule of #aw is idealist in
Aature which is quite impossible to implement in the nation li-e India!
'ccording to 3iceys theory *ustice must be done through -nown
principles of law and not by principles of men! e believes that where
there is discretion there is always a room for arbitrariness!Fritishers imposed so called rule of law concept in its colonies not
with an intention to impart *ustice but to ruin colonies by passing
oppressive laws! "oday, we need the rule of law for punishing
deviations and lapses from the code of conduct and standards of
behaviour which the community spea-ing through its representatives
has prescribed as the law of the land! "o curb and control that brute
and to prevent the degeneration of society into a state of tooth and
claw, what is required is the Rule of #aw!