29
Presentation for the 8 th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting Presentation for the Presentation for the 8 8 th th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting March 6, 2008 March 6, 2008 March 6, 2008 1 1

Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

  • Upload
    lyanh

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

Presentation for the8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting

Presentation for thePresentation for the88thth Stakeholder Advisory Group MeetingStakeholder Advisory Group Meeting

March 6, 2008March 6, 2008March 6, 2008

11

Page 2: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

Overview of the Action Plan

> The master plan for goods movement in Southern California that is regional in scope.

> This plan builds upon and complements other goods movement plans.

> Intended to be used as a guide in preparation of state, regional, and local transportation plans.

> Represents a partnership between county, regional, and state transportation agencies.

> Presents regional modeling of freight facilities.> Presents a market segmented approach to addressing

goods movement and associated issues.> Respects Agency Roles and authority.

22

Page 3: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

What’s New

> The Action Plan represents a partnership between county, regional, and state transportation agencies, resulting in ongoing collaboration with State and Federal agencies.

> The Action Plan included regional modeling of freight facilities.

> The Action Plan presents a market segmented approach to addressing goods movement and associated issues.

> The Action Plan is a new vision that encourages collaborative efforts and regional consensus.

> First time development of an Action Plan accommodated continuous dialogue of all stakeholders through out the process

33

Page 4: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

Agency Roles

> The MCGMAP partners are the transportation and planning agencies that co-manage the development of the Action Plan.> The MCGMAP partners plan, fund, maintain, operate,

construct and implement multi-modal transportation projects.

> The MCGMAP partners influence the goods movement system through the regional planning and programming of funds to transportation projects.

44

Page 5: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

MCGMAP Study AreaMCGMAP Study Area

55

Page 6: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

Implementation Principles

1. Guideline2. Investment3. Cost Distribution4. Management5. Public Benefit6. Land Use Compatibility

66

Page 7: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

Challenges

77

Page 8: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

Challenges (Continued)> Mobility

> More than doubling of regional VMT and freight rail traffic by 2030

> 5.4 million hours of daily delay by 2030> Some freeways may carry more than 80,000 trucks per

day> Environment and Community

> In 2005, almost $19.5 billion is health costs due to freight transport in California

> Premature deaths – 2,400 (CARB) statewide, 1,200 in South Coast Air Basin

88

Page 9: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

Challenges (Continued)> Environment and Community (continued)*

> California counties not meeting the basic public health standard for fine particles leading to health issues

> Major roadways are pollution “hot spots”> Even full fleet turnover to 2010 truck standards and to

the Tier 4 locomotive standards proposed by USEPA will not provide sufficient reductions

> Additional emission reductions — over and above the control measures the agencies have been able to identify for inclusion in plans to date — will have to be implemented

> Incompatible Land Uses

99

* Source: “Southern California’s Freight Movement Challenge” presentation to California Bar Association Environmental Law Conference, October 2007 (SANBAG)

Page 10: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

Challenges (Continued)> Funding

> More than $50 billion required to fund Action Plan projects and programs in the next 30 years

> Economic> Logistics activity is directly responsible for 6.6% of the

region’s economy> One logistics job supports 2.2 new jobs> Border crossing delays resulted in the loss of $3.9 billion

from the binational economy

1010

Page 11: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

Modal Market Segments Modal Market Segments

On

lyO

nly

Truck

Truck

On

lyO

nly

Rail

Rail

At least on

e truck trip

At least on

e truck trip

1111* All percentages estimated based on 2005 data.

Page 12: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

Strategic means to address …Truck Issues

Strategic means to address Strategic means to address ……Truck IssuesTruck Issues

Hwy Operations & CapacityHwy Operations & CapacityGeneral purp. hwy networkGeneral purp. hwy network

Innovative StrategiesInnovative Strategies1) Inland staging areas (inland port); 1) Inland staging areas (inland port);

2) Separated corridor (truck lanes, rail, 2) Separated corridor (truck lanes, rail, maglev, other shuttle technologies);maglev, other shuttle technologies);

3) Clean fuels & efficient vehicles 3) Clean fuels & efficient vehicles (LNG trucks, maglev, LNG locomotives);(LNG trucks, maglev, LNG locomotives);

4) Warehouse clustering 4) Warehouse clustering around inland port.around inland port.

Maximize OnMaximize On--Dock RailDock RailMinimize local truck drayageMinimize local truck drayage

1212

Page 13: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

Strategic means to address …“Fair Share” Funding

Strategic means to address Strategic means to address ……““Fair ShareFair Share”” FundingFunding

Limited OpportunityLimited OpportunityDifficult to target specific users/beneficiaries of the Difficult to target specific users/beneficiaries of the

Gen. Gen. purppurp. hwy system in a fair manner.. hwy system in a fair manner.

Maximum OpportunityMaximum OpportunityTarget ALL users/beneficiariesTarget ALL users/beneficiaries

1) State and Federal1) State and Federal2) User fees2) User fees

Moderate OpportunityModerate OpportunityTarget specific users/beneficiariesTarget specific users/beneficiaries

•• Regional truck markets & destinationsRegional truck markets & destinations•• Combine with innovative strategiesCombine with innovative strategies

1313

Page 14: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

Potential Future System

1414

Page 15: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

ACCELERATEACCELERATE Regional Environmental MitigationRegional Environmental Mitigation

Four Sets of ActionsFour Sets of Actions

1) Region1) Region--wide approaches 2) Project specific mitigation wide approaches 2) Project specific mitigation measuresmeasures

RELIEVERELIEVE Congestion and Increase MobilityCongestion and Increase Mobility1) Increase intermodal and mainline rail capacity 2) Improve 1) Increase intermodal and mainline rail capacity 2) Improve highways/roadwayshighways/roadways

IMPROVEIMPROVE Operational EfficienciesOperational Efficiencies

1) Improve marine terminal productivity, truck turn times, and 1) Improve marine terminal productivity, truck turn times, and intermodal operations 2) Improve highway operationsintermodal operations 2) Improve highway operations

DEVELOP EQUITABLEDEVELOP EQUITABLE Public/Private Funding StrategyPublic/Private Funding Strategy

1)1)Maximize the regionMaximize the region’’s fair share of Federal/state fundss fair share of Federal/state funds2)2)Obtain private sector contributionObtain private sector contribution

1515

Page 16: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

Freight Growth Scenarios

1616

Source: IMPLAN Model

Notes:

1. 42.5 million TEUs is a capacity constrained forecast.

2. Employment impact shown in terms of logistics-related jobs.

Page 17: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

Evaluations

SPB Ports to High Desert

1717

Source: SCAG Draft 2030 AQMP Travel Demand Model

Page 18: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

Preliminary Tolling AnalysisPreliminary Tolling Analysis

$0.00$0.00

$2.00$2.00

$4.00$4.00

$6.00$6.00

$8.00$8.00

$10.00$10.00

$12.00$12.00

Truck TollTruck Toll LCV TollLCV Toll LCV/Truck TollLCV/Truck Toll

OtherOther Toll Revenue BondsToll Revenue Bonds

$Bill

ion

$Bill

ion

33%33%40%40%

58%58%

* 40 Year amortization increases coverage by 13%.* 40 Year amortization increases coverage by 13%.1818

Low Low ---- 49%49%High High ---- 66%66%

Page 19: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

Outreach Efforts > Occurred throughout

plan development> Stakeholder

Advisory Group Meetings> Began in 2005> Various locations> Diverse attendance

> One-on-one meetings

1919

Page 20: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

Key Stakeholder Concerns

1. More aggressive environmental mitigation strategies to reduce current impacts.

2. Dedicate new private/public funding sources to reduce health and environmental impacts.

3. More aggressive use of alternative fuels and/or new technologies.

4. Study all costs and benefits of meeting a seemingly unlimited goods movement demand.

5. Consider limiting trade growth to invest in clean industries.

2020

Page 21: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

••Avoid, reduce and mitigate environmental, Avoid, reduce and mitigate environmental, community, and health impacts.community, and health impacts.

CoreMandates

CoreCoreMandatesMandates

EnvironmentEnvironment

•• Promote the safe and efficient movement of all Promote the safe and efficient movement of all transportation modes and reduce congestion.transportation modes and reduce congestion.

MobilityMobility

•• Ensure the economic wellEnsure the economic well--being of the region and being of the region and the state.the state.

EconomyEconomy

•• Secure the regionSecure the region’’s fair share of public and private s fair share of public and private funds for investment in the freight transportation funds for investment in the freight transportation system.system.

FundingFunding

2121

Page 22: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

Action Plan Projects/Strategies

> Included in Draft Executive Summary> Two lists – Regional and County level> Over $50 billion in total cost, of which approximately $2.4 billion

is currently committed> Project/Strategy Categories

> Project-specific environmental mitigation emissions reductions> Rail> Intermodal ground access> Alternative technology> Freeway/highway

2222

Page 23: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

Regional Goods Movement Projects/Strategies

Notes: 1. All figures include environmental mitigation costs. 3. Projects must demonstrate regional public benefit to qualify for public funds.

2. S=Short-term (2007-2015); M=Mid-term (2015-2025); L=Long-term (post 2025) 4. Private sector primary fund source.5. Require further analysis west of US-395, private sector primary fund source, with possible exception of short-term project to construct section between Phantom East and I-15 ($490 million)

2323

Page 24: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

TBD$10 • Transportation Management, Information and Security SystemLA

TBD$7 • Wilmington ATSAC System in City of Los AngelesLA

TBD$6 • San Pedro ATSAC System in City of Los AngelesLAITS Applications

ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY

S, M$822 • San Diego Port District Marine Terminal Ground AccessSD

TBD$60 • Shuttle Train Intermodal Service to Inland Empire; Inland Terminal

LAMaritime

TBDTBD• Build New BNSF Intermodal Yard in VictorvilleSBDIntermodal Yards/Facilities

INTERMODAL GROUND ACCESS

S, M$328 • Construct South Line Rail/TrolleySD

S, M$1,350 • Construct Coastal Rail CorridorLA

S$15 • Relief siding (2 projects) and upgrade sidings (1 project) on the Antelope Valley Line

LAMainline Capacity Enhancement

S$29 • Nogales Street (LA Subdivision) grade separation projectLA

TBDTBD• SR-118/Coast Line - Construct Grade SeparationVEN

TBD$45 • Construct Rose Avenue/UP Grade SeparationVEN

TBD$45 • Construct Rice Avenue/UP Grade SeparationVENGrade Separations

RAIL

Time-frame²2007 Cost¹(in millions)DescriptionCountyMode/System

County Goods Movement System Improvements

Notes: 1. All figures include environmental mitigation costs.

2. S=Short-term (2007-2015); M=Mid-term (2015-2025); L=Long-term (post 2025) 2424

Page 25: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

M$315 • I-5 between the vicinity of El Toro "Y" to near SR-73 add new lanes in each direction

OR

M$319.20 • I-5 between SR-55 and the SR-133 (near El Toro "Y") add one general purpose lane in each direction and improve interchanges in the vicinity

OR

S$120 • I-5 Reconstruct El Toro Road InterchangeOR

M$430 • I-5 From the I-5/SR-22/SR-57 Interchange to SR-91 add a general purpose lane in each direction

OR

TBD$134 • I-110 Connector Improvement Program (4 Projects)LA

TBD$43 • Seaside Avenue/Ocean Blvd (SR-47) and Navy Way InterchangeLA

TBD$29 • Alameda Street Widening and Reconstruction in Los Angeels (101 Freeway to 7th Street; I-10 to 7th Street)

LA

S$14 • Washington Blvd. Widening and Reconstruction projectLA

TBD$39 • I-1110 8th/9th Street Interchange - Add Auxiliary Lanes and Modify/Reconstruct Ramps (Two Projects)

LA

S$550 • Reconstruct SR-60/SR-57 interchangeLA

S$1,000 • Reconstruct I-605/I-10 interchangeLA

S$1,000 • Reconstruct I-605/SR-60 interchangeLA

S$240 • Reconstruct SR-91/I605 interchangeLA

TBDTBD• Key Goods Movement Arterial ImprovementsLA

M$75 • Reconstruct US 101/Rice Avenue ICVENFreight Corridor Capacity Enhancement and Operational Improvements

FREEWAY/HIGHWAY

Time-frame²2007 Cost¹(in millions)DescriptionCountyMode/System

County Goods Movement System Improvements (Continued)

Notes: 1. All figures include environmental mitigation costs.

2. S=Short-term (2007-2015); M=Mid-term (2015-2025); L=Long-term (post 2025) 2525

Page 26: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

M$32 • Pipeline Truck Access (Petroleum Terminal) to I-15 (Truck route/Interchange improvementsSD

M$32 • San Diego International Airport Truck Access to I-5 (Truck route/Interchange improvementsSD

S$1,801 • I-805 Widen/Managed Lanes (From SR-905 to I-5)SD

S$608 • I-5 Widen/Managed Lanes & Operational Improvements (From SR-163 to SR-78)SD

S$962 • I-5 Widen/Managed Lanes (From La Jolla Village Dr. to Vandergrift)SD

S$700 • Interstate 10 Widening and Interchange Improvements (From SR-163 to SR-78)SBD

S$200 • I-15 Widening and Devore Interchange (at I-215) ReconstructionSBD

L$100 • I-10/SR60 New Interchange ConstructionRIV

S$75 • March ARB/Global Cargo Port Van Buren Interchange ProjectRIV

S$50 • SR-60/10 Truck Climbing LaneRIV

L$328.9 • I-405 from the I-5 to SR-55 add 1 general purpose lane in each directionOR

S$96 • SR-91 Eastbound Add a Lane Between SR-55 (Lakeview and SR-241 and Westbound From SR-241 to Imperial Highway).OR

M$120 • SR-91 Westbound - Provide a General Purpose Lane from SR-55 to SR-57 and add auxiliary laneOR

S$152 • SR-91 Westbound From SR-57 to I-5 - Add General Purpose Lane & Auxiliary LaneOR

S$190.8 • SR-57 in the Northbound Direction Extend General Purpose Lane #5 Between Orangewood and SR-91 and Add Auxiliary LaneOR

S$140 • SR-57 Northbound From Orangethorpe to Lambert Road, Add Auxiliary Lane & 5th through laneOR

M$157 • SR-57 Northbound From Lambert Road to the SR-60 interchange add truck climbing laneOR

L$260 • I-5 Construct new interchange at Crown Valley (Saddleback) and reconstruct interchange at Avery Parkway with collector distributor road between Crown Valley and AveryOR

M$411 • I-5 Southbound From Alicia Parkway to the Crown Valley Interchange add a LaneOR

L$240 • I-5 Northbound Extend Existing Truck Bypass Lane From Crown Valley to El Toro Road. Add Auxiliary lane where needed.OR

Freight Corridor Capacity Enhancement and Operational Improvements (cont.)

FREEWAY/HIGHWAY (Continued)

Time-frame²2007 Cost¹(in millions)DescriptionCountyMode/System

County Goods Movement System Improvements (Continued)

Notes: 1. All figures include environmental mitigation costs.

2. S=Short-term (2007-2015); M=Mid-term (2015-2025); L=Long-term (post 2025) 2626

Page 27: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

Next Steps

> Environmental and Community Impacts> Partnership and Advocacy> Mobility> Funding> Additional Plans/Studies

> Environmental Justice Grant for MCGMAP (Underway)> Los Angeles County Strategic Plan (Late Summer 2008)> SCAG Goods Movement Implementation Plan (Late

Spring 2008)

2727

Page 28: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

Completion Schedule

> Receive stakeholder comments on the Draft Action Plan and Executive Summary – through March 17, 2008 (close of business)

> County workshops – 13 total through February 2008

> Board presentations and approval – December 2007 through April 2008

> Release of Final Action Plan and Executive Summary – April, 2008

2828

Page 29: Presentation for the th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetingmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/SAG_Meeting_8_FAP.… · 8th Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting ... > The

Questions & AnswersQuestions & Answers

More Information: More Information: www.metro.net/mcgmapwww.metro.net/mcgmap

2929