27
Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Presentation by Karl Rittger

This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA

Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Page 2: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

MotivationIn snowmelt dominated river basins, snow properties

near peak accumulation are used to assess spring and summer runoff. Forecast models rely on estimates of the water stored in the snowpack to determine the contribution of snowmelt to runoff.

Current operational runoff forecasts (DWR & NWS) assume stationary relationship between sparse point measurements of snow water equivalent and runoffSpring runoff forecasts use snow course measurements

taken near the 1st of each monthAnalysis of snow course measurements show non-

stationarity ie. trends Howat and Tulaczyk (2005) find decreasing and

increasing SWE trends dependent on both latitude and elevation

Page 3: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Snow Water Equivalent in the Sierra Nevada

Page 4: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Can we improve runoff forecasting by integrating remote sensing sources?Snow Covered Area

From satellites MODIS

Daily at 500m Landsat

Every 16 days at 30m

Snow Water EquivalentTelemetered pillows

Daily measurements

Page 5: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Spring Runoff in the Sierra Nevada for the last 100 years

Based on monthly unimpaired runoff volumes, we selected a set of years during the Landsat TM historical record (1985-2007) that encompass 80% of the range of variability in runoff during the last century.

An average family uses 0.25 to 1.0 acre-feet a year

Page 6: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Study Area – Location and Topography

Page 7: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Topographic CharacteristicsElevation

American lowerKern higher

AspectKern south

facingSlope

SimilarKern slightly

steeper

Page 8: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Spring Runoff for each WatershedWe estimate the fraction of snow in each 30 m pixel for the American, San Joaquin and Kern watersheds for five years that represent the minimum, quartiles and maximum April, May, and June unimpaired runoff. Recent years have produced similar variability in runoff, and fractional snow cover is estimated from MODIS for these years at 500 m resolution.

Page 9: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Satellite Spectral BandsLandsat

MODIS

Page 10: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Landsat Thematic Mapper(TM and ETM+)

Page 11: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)

Page 12: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Top of Atmosphere Reflectancefor LandsatLλ = "gain" * QCAL + "offset“

Lλ = ((LMAXλ - LMINλ)/(QCALMAX-QCALMIN)) * (QCAL-QCALMIN) + LMINλ

Page 13: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

6S radiative transfer code (http://6s.ltdri.org)

Developed by the Laboratoire d'Optique Atmospherique. The code permits calculations of near-nadir (down-looking) aircraft observations, elevated surfaces, non lambertian surface conditions, absorbing gases, Rayleigh scattering, and aerosol scattering effects. The spectral resolution is 2.5 nm.Primarily used for LUTs for MODIS

Kotchenova et al. 2006 Kotchenova and Vermote 2007

List of other atmospheric radiative transfer codes

Page 14: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Physical BackgroundFraction of photons from target reach satellite

sensor.Typically 80% at 0.85 µm and 50% at 0.45µm Photons lost though absorption and scatteringAbsorption from

Aerosols (small) or atmospheric gassesPrincipally O3, H2O, O2, CO2, CH4, N2O

Scattering

Page 15: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Surface Reflectance using 6S

Signal perturbed by gaseous absorption and scattering by molecules and aerosols

Absorption by atmospheric gases: O3, H2O, O2, CO2,CH4, and N2O

Page 16: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Surface reflectance to TOA reflectance for Landsat

Page 17: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Solar Zenith and Elevation

Page 18: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Snow Covered Area fromSpectral Unmixing

Roberts et al, 1998Painter et al, 2003

Page 19: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

SWE from snow pillows San Joaquin 3/8/2004

Page 20: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

(Roughly?) Estimating SWE for a River BasinFassnacht et al, 2003Hypsometric Interpolation with inverse weighted

distance interpolation of the residualsSpreads snow into the ocean

Blended SWEMultiply by SCA

Page 21: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Results from 2004 near peak SWE

Page 22: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

SCA and Elevation

Page 23: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

SWE and Elevation

Page 24: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Snow Covered Area totalsLandsat

MODIS

Page 25: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Snow Water Equivalent totals

Am

erica

n

San

Joaq

uin

Kern A

merica

n

San

Joaq

uin

Kern

Page 26: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

Correlation of SCA, SWE and blended SWE with Runoff

Page 27: Presentation by Karl Rittger This work is supported by Naval Postgraduate School Award N00244-07-1-113 and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNG04GC52A

ConclusionAlthough snow water equivalent interpolations are

influenced by data availability, when combined with remote sensing it can be useful in predicting stream flow. These techniques can provide water managers with more accurate volumes of water stored in snowpack

Further work will investigate alternative interpolation methods as well as utilize space-time interpolated MODIS snow cover to provide basin SWE estimates over the season