Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ST-13 Bioeconomía “ La herramienta para el desarrollo de la economía circular”
Sonia Castañón de la Torre
APLICACIÓN DE TECNOLOGÍAS INNOVADORAS EN EL DESARROLLO DE UNA BIOREFINERÍA DE
MICROALGAS VIABLE Y SOSTENIBLE
“OVERCOMING THE BARRIERS TO DEVELOPMENT OF CULTURES OF MICROALGAE FOR ENERGY PURPOSES” (Ref: EFA217/11)
2012-2014
CONAMA 2016-ST-13 Bioeconomía: “ La herramienta para el desarrollo de la economía circular”
“NETWORK OF TECHNOLOGICAL CENTRES TO DEVELOP A BIOREFINERY FROM ALGAE” (Ref: EFA037/15)
2016-2019
Suarez, S.; Urreta, I.; Izaguirre, J.K. and Castañón, S.
BIODIESEL
IT IS ESTIMATED THAT THE WORLD’S ENERGY CONSUMPTION WILL HAVE GROWN 40% BY 2030. INCREASING ENERGY DEMAND FORECASTS, TOGETHER WITH GEOGRAPHICAL CONSUMPTION REDISTRIBUTION, WILL CONTRIBUTE TO THE FURTHER DEPLETION OF FOSSIL FUELS AND TO PUSH THEIR PRICES UP AS A RESULT OF A HIGHER SUPPLY-DEMAND IMBALANCE. ENERGY DEPENDENCY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION CURRENTLY AMOUNTS TO 53% AND ON THE FACE OF THE STEADY ESCALATION IN ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND ENERGY IMPORTS, THE EU IS LOOKING AT THE CURRENT TRENDS WITH CONCERN.
THE IDEAL SOURCE OF BIOENERGY: MICROALGAE
DO NOT COMPETE WITH FOOD CROPS
ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS AND SUSTAINABILITY: LESS FERTILE SOIL, LOWER DEMAND OF WATER RESOURCES AND HIGH CO2 FIXATION.
BIOREFINERY-MICROALGAE
ACCORDING TO THE HIGH GROWTH RATES AND OIL PRODUCTIVITY THAT SOME OF THESE SPECIES SHOW, IT IS ESTIMATED THAT THE AVERAGE BIODIESEL PRODUCTION FROM MICROALGAE COULD REACH TO A 20-TIMES HIGHER VALUE COMPARED TO OTHER OLEAGINOUS SOIL SPECIES (CHISTI, 2007).
THE MICROALGAE-BASED BIOREFINERY PROGRAMMES STARTED MANY YEARS AGO. IT IS TIME TO MOVE FORWARD IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRIALIZATION PROCESSES FOR MICROALGAE PRODUCTION, SPECIALLY FOR THOSE WITH BIOENERGETIC PURPOSES.
CROP OIL PRODUCTION (L/Ha/YEAR)
SOY 450 CAMELINA 580
SUNFLOWER 950 JATROPHA 1.900
PALM 6.000 ALGAE 9.000-37.000
(PIENKOS, 2007)
BIODEPURATION
o Fossil CO2 up-take o Wastewater treatment o Bioremediation/biodepuration
NUTRACEUTICALS
o Body-care products o Carotenoids o Omega-3
CHEMICALS
o Pigments o Chemical building blocks o Reactants
BIOFUELS
o Biodiesel o Biogas o Bioethanol o Biohydrogen
FOOD and FEED
o Proteins o Starch o PUFAs o Antioxidants o Pre-biotic effects o Additives AGRICULTURE
o Biofertilizer o Bioestimulant o Bioelicitor
MICROALGAE CAN BE VALORIZED IN SEVERAL SECTORS AND MARKETS
ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY-----MAIN BOTTLENECK TO OVERCOME
MARKET VOLUMEN vs. MARKET REVENUES
NUTRA
FOOD
FEED
AGRICULTURE
BIOPOLYMERS
BIOFUELS
NUTRA
FOOD
FEED
AGRICULTURE
BIOPOLYMERS
BIOFUELS
ECONOMIC DRIVING FORCE
NECESSARY TO BE CONSIDERED (BIOREFINERY)
MARKET SIZE
MARK
ET E
CONO
MIC
REVE
NUE
PRODUCTION COSTS RELATIVE MARKET BENEFITS
ENERGREEN “OVERCOMING THE BARRIERS TO DEVELOPMENT OF CULTURES OF MICROALGAE FOR ENERGY PURPOSES”
BIODIESEL CO2 ENZIMES METANIZATION METABOLOMICS
CULTURE AND PRODUCTION
THE PROJECT AIM IS THE READAPTING OF CONVENTIONAL MICROALGAE CULTURES TO OBTAIN MICROORGANISMS WITH HIGHER PRODUCTIVE POTENTIAL (OIL) AND SUITABLE FOR PRODUCING BIODIESEL IN A MORE COST EFFECTIVE AND ENVIRONMENTALLY SUSTAINABLE WAY. ……from cultivation to processing into biodiesel including the exploitation of waste material obtained from oil extraction, as biomolecules or biogas. THE DEVELOPMENT OF MICROALGAE FARMING STRATEGIES TO OBTAIN ALGAE BIOMASS RICH IN LIPIDS
THE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE OIL EXTRACTION AND PROCESSING SYSTEMS
The research of the potential of CO2 bio-fixation by microalgae from industrial gases with high CO2 content
The evaluation of micro-algae and related extraction wastes used as raw material for the production of BIOGAS, anaerobic digestion and as a potential source of molecules of interest for other sectors
CHALLENGE: LIPID PRODUCTIVITY INCREASE IN CULTURES…………..means a reduction in the production costs WE NEED STRAIN SELECTION FOR HIGH OIL CONTENT, SUITABLE FATTY ACID PROFILE FOR BIODIESEL CONVERSION, HIGH GROWTH RATE AND AN ECONOMICALLY PROFITABLE CULTURE SYSTEM DUE TO THE LOW ECONOMIC VALUE OF BIODIESEL (YEH & CHANG, 2011).
CHLORELLA: EASY CULTURE AND HIGH GROWTH RATE Standard conditions: 20% LIPIDS and 3% FAMES in dry weight
SCENEDESMUS: HIGH GROWTH RATE, TOLERANT TO ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES, RESISTANT TO CONTAMINATION WITH OTHER SPECIES Standard conditions: 25% LIPIDS and 10% FAMES in dry weight
BIOMASS COMPOSITION INCLUDES PROTEINS, CARBOHYDRATES, LIPIDS AND FIBRE IN VARABLE PROPORTIONS, MAKING IT A VERSATILE RAW MATERIAL
NUTRITIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS APPLIED IN CULTURE CAN MODIFY
DRAMATICALLY THE BIOMASS COMPOSITION AND HENCE, ITS ENERGY VALUE
Light Nutritional restriction CO2 Balance N:P:Fe
TAGs productivity Biomass composition Growth + =
“development of a culture strategy that allows improving the energy quality of
microalgae biomass as biodiesel source”
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
48 72 96 120 144 168
Time (Hours)
TAG
s (%
DW
)
N-starved
N-replete
0
2
4
6
0 48 96 144 192
Bio
mas
s (g
PSL-
1 ) Serie1Serie1
N-replete N-limited
0
3
6
9
12
0 48 96 144 192Time (H)
Neu
tral
Lip
id (%
PS
)
N ( + )
48 h 96 h 144 h
196 h
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
48 72 96 120 144 168
Time (Hours)
(LIP
%D
W)
N-starved
N-replete
THE LIMITATION OF NITROGEN AVAILABILITY CAUSES RESERVE LIPIDS STORAGE IN TAGs
NITROGEN STARVATION
Gráfico4
00
2424
4848
7272
9696
120120
144144
168168
Time (H)
Biomass (gPSL-1)
0.1462417991
0.1423546589
0.5784823088
0.5434980469
1.1882892791
1.2725738557
1.6990215784
1.8028366643
2.3780386059
2.2403295536
3.0781978839
2.5561833972
4.3834237172
2.6645018772
5.1312715689
2.74
Hoja1
SCNEDESMUS
LPN 6mMdesvMSCdesv
Duración de N en medio (Horas)48240
Tiempo cultivo (Horas)264240
D (gPSL-1)4.1 ± 0.50.5
Lip (%PS)37 ± 0.10.131.8 ± 4.54.5
FAMES (%)30 ± 0.80.89.6 ± 11
P (mgPSL-1d-1)3754146745
P (mgFAMES L-1d-1)1131244.84.3
LPN 6mMMSC
Lipidos Totales3121.7
FAMEs29.69.7
Otos Lip1.412
Carbohidratos37.427.1
Proteinas15.546.4
Cenizas1.22.9
No determinados14.91.9
85.198.1
CHLORELLA
Nitrogen (-)Nitrogen( +)
Duración de N en medio (Horas)48168
Tiempo cultivo (Horas)168168
D (gPSL-1)2.80.15.10.1
Lip (%PS)22.5 ± 0.20.216.9 ± 0.50.5
FAMES (%)18.57
P (mgPSL-1d-1)395.66.4712.112.0
P (mgFAMES L-1d-1)73.2649.912
LimitadosNo Limitados
Lipidos Totales24.316.316.332.82
FAMEs187.000.68
Lipidos Polares6.39.3
Carbohidratos45.429.829.774.55
Proteinas19.845.645.636.13
Cenizas10.68.38.271.40
No determinados
100100.00
Hoja1
416.4338852386
4511.9579474679
Scenedesmus
Chlorella
PB (mgL-1d-1)
Hoja2
126
4.312
Scenedesmus
Chlorella
PFAMES (mgL-1d-1)
Hoja3
0.1
0.1
Final Biomass (gDW L-1)
00
2424
4848
7272
9696
120120
144144
168168
Tieme (H)
Neutral Lipid (%PS)
3.2
4.6
1.9189495837
4.5989085209
3.2909514167
4.4324236361
3.2813566376
6.4330768288
3.356762773
8.6500659339
3.8750044476
9.3238331877
3.4699936348
11.3695169323
00
2424
4848
7272
9696
120120
144144
168168
Time (H)
Biomass (gPSL-1)
0.1462417991
0.1423546589
0.5784823088
0.5434980469
1.1882892791
1.2725738557
1.6990215784
1.8028366643
2.3780386059
2.2403295536
3.0781978839
2.5561833972
4.3834237172
2.6645018772
5.1312715689
2.74
Gráfico3
00
2424
4848
7272
9696
120120
144144
168168
Time (H)
Neutral Lipid (%PS)
3.2
4.6
1.9189495837
4.5989085209
3.2909514167
4.4324236361
3.2813566376
6.4330768288
3.356762773
8.6500659339
3.8750044476
9.3238331877
3.4699936348
11.3695169323
Hoja1
SCNEDESMUS
LPN 6mMdesvMSCdesv
Duración de N en medio (Horas)48240
Tiempo cultivo (Horas)264240
D (gPSL-1)4.1 ± 0.50.5
Lip (%PS)37 ± 0.10.131.8 ± 4.54.5
FAMES (%)30 ± 0.80.89.6 ± 11
P (mgPSL-1d-1)3754146745
P (mgFAMES L-1d-1)1131244.84.3
LPN 6mMMSC
Lipidos Totales3121.7
FAMEs29.69.7
Otos Lip1.412
Carbohidratos37.427.1
Proteinas15.546.4
Cenizas1.22.9
No determinados14.91.9
85.198.1
CHLORELLA
Nitrogen (-)Nitrogen( +)
Duración de N en medio (Horas)48168
Tiempo cultivo (Horas)168168
D (gPSL-1)2.80.15.10.1
Lip (%PS)22.5 ± 0.20.216.9 ± 0.50.5
FAMES (%)18.57
P (mgPSL-1d-1)395.66.4712.112.0
P (mgFAMES L-1d-1)73.2649.912
LimitadosNo Limitados
Lipidos Totales24.316.316.332.82
FAMEs187.000.68
Lipidos Polares6.39.3
Carbohidratos45.429.829.774.55
Proteinas19.845.645.636.13
Cenizas10.68.38.271.40
No determinados
100100.00
Hoja1
416.4338852386
4511.9579474679
Scenedesmus
Chlorella
PB (mgL-1d-1)
Hoja2
126
4.312
Scenedesmus
Chlorella
PFAMES (mgL-1d-1)
Hoja3
0.1
0.1
Final Biomass (gDW L-1)
00
2424
4848
7272
9696
120120
144144
168168
Tieme (H)
Neutral Lipid (%PS)
3.2
4.6
1.9189495837
4.5989085209
3.2909514167
4.4324236361
3.2813566376
6.4330768288
3.356762773
8.6500659339
3.8750044476
9.3238331877
3.4699936348
11.3695169323
00
2424
4848
7272
9696
120120
144144
168168
Time (H)
Biomass (gPSL-1)
0.1462417991
0.1423546589
0.5784823088
0.5434980469
1.1882892791
1.2725738557
1.6990215784
1.8028366643
2.3780386059
2.2403295536
3.0781978839
2.5561833972
4.3834237172
2.6645018772
5.1312715689
2.74
0
200
400
600
800
Limitados No Limitados
PB (m
gL-1
d-1)
ScenedesmusChlorella
0
50
100
150
Limitados No Limitados
PFA
ME
S (m
gL-1
d-1)
ScenedesmusChlorella
ADVANCES IN THE CULTURE TECHNOLOGY ARE KEY FACTORS TO ACHIEVE COSTS REDUCTION AND IMPROVE PROFITABILITY FOR THE WHOLE VALUE CHAIN OF MICROALGAE CULTURE
THE PROGRESSIVE NITROGEN LIMITATION IMPROVES FAME CONTENT INCREASING PRODUCTIVITY REGARDLESS OF THE DROP IN BIOMASS
PRODUCTION
Gráfico1
LimitadosLimitados416.4338852386
No LimitadosNo Limitados4511.9579474679
Scenedesmus
Chlorella
PB (mgL-1d-1)
375
395.5767865946
467
712.1471099722
Hoja1
SCNEDESMUS
LPN 6mMdesvMSCdesv
Duración de N en medio (Horas)48240
Tiempo cultivo (Horas)264240
D (gPSL-1)4.1 ± 0.50.5
Lip (%PS)37 ± 0.10.131.8 ± 4.54.5
FAMES (%)30 ± 0.80.89.6 ± 11
P (mgPSL-1d-1)3754146745
P (mgFAMES L-1d-1)1131244.84.3
LPN 6mMMSC
FAMEs29.69.7
Lipidos Totales3121.7
Carbohidratos37.427.1
Proteinas15.546.4
Cenizas1.22.9
No determinados14.91.9
85.198.1
CHLORELLA
LimitadosNo Limitados
Duración de N en medio (Horas)48168
Tiempo cultivo (Horas)168168
D (gPSL-1)2.8 ± 0.10.15.1 ± 0.10.1
Lip (%PS)22.5 ± 0.20.216.9 ± 0.50.5
FAMES (%)18.57
P (mgPSL-1d-1)395.66.4712.112.0
P (mgFAMES L-1d-1)73.2649.912
LimitadosNo Limitados
FAMEs187.000.68
Lipidos Totales24.316.316.332.82
Carbohidratos45.429.829.774.55
Proteinas19.845.645.636.13
Cenizas10.68.38.271.40
No determinados
Hoja1
416.4338852386
4511.9579474679
Scenedesmus
Chlorella
PB (mgL-1d-1)
Hoja2
126
4.312
Scenedesmus
Chlorella
PFAMES (mgL-1d-1)
Hoja3
Gráfico2
LimitadosLimitados126
No LimitadosNo Limitados4.312
Scenedesmus
Chlorella
PFAMES (mgL-1d-1)
113
73.18170552
44.8
49.8502976981
Hoja1
SCNEDESMUS
LPN 6mMdesvMSCdesv
Duración de N en medio (Horas)48240
Tiempo cultivo (Horas)264240
D (gPSL-1)4.1 ± 0.50.5
Lip (%PS)37 ± 0.10.131.8 ± 4.54.5
FAMES (%)30 ± 0.80.89.6 ± 11
P (mgPSL-1d-1)3754146745
P (mgFAMES L-1d-1)1131244.84.3
LPN 6mMMSC
FAMEs29.69.7
Lipidos Totales3121.7
Carbohidratos37.427.1
Proteinas15.546.4
Cenizas1.22.9
No determinados14.91.9
85.198.1
CHLORELLA
LimitadosNo Limitados
Duración de N en medio (Horas)48168
Tiempo cultivo (Horas)168168
D (gPSL-1)2.8 ± 0.10.15.1 ± 0.10.1
Lip (%PS)22.5 ± 0.20.216.9 ± 0.50.5
FAMES (%)18.57
P (mgPSL-1d-1)395.66.4712.112.0
P (mgFAMES L-1d-1)73.2649.912
LimitadosNo Limitados
FAMEs187.000.68
Lipidos Totales24.316.316.332.82
Carbohidratos45.429.829.774.55
Proteinas19.845.645.636.13
Cenizas10.68.38.271.40
No determinados
Hoja1
416.4338852386
4511.9579474679
Scenedesmus
Chlorella
PB (mgL-1d-1)
Hoja2
126
4.312
Scenedesmus
Chlorella
PFAMES (mgL-1d-1)
Hoja3
Nitrogen Available
Chlorella vulgaris Scenedesmus sp.
Ashes FAMEs
Polar Lipids
Carbohydrates
Proteins
Proteins
Carbohydrates
Other Lipids
FAMEs Ashes
Not determined
NITROGEN LIMITATION LED TO AN INCREASE IN FAMES AND CARBOHYDRATES. RISING OF BOTH COMPOUNDS REPRESENTS AN
IMPROVEMENT IN THE ENERGY VALUE OF THE BIOMASS
Proteins
Carbohydrates
Polar Lipids
FAMEs Ashes Ashes
Not determinaded
Proteins
FAMEs
Other Lipids
Carbohydrates
Nitrogen Limitation
EFFECT OF CULTURE FACTORS IN THE BIOMASS COMPOSITION
% FAMEs C.vulgaris 16-19 11-13 9 - 13
% FAMEs Scenedesmus 30 22 10
LABORATORY GREENHOUSE PILOT-PLANT
BIODIESEL produced with 99%DE FAMES 90% FAMES 80% FAMES
14-16% HUMIDITY 99 % HUMIDITY
•PHOSPHOLIPIDS 20-40 % •GLUCOLIPIDS 10-20 % •TRIGLYCERIDES 30-50 %
•PHOSPHOLIPIDS 1-2 % •GLUCOLIPIDS 0 % •TRIGLYCERIDES 98-99
DECANTATION FLOCCULATION FILTRATION CENTRIFUGATION** DRYING* LIOFILIZATION *
HEXANE. NOT VERY EFFECTIVE. NEEDS DRYING
CLO/ METHANOL. EFFECTIVE/ TOXIC. NEEDS DRYING
SAPONIFICATION WITH ETHANOL AND HEXANE. NO NEED FOR DRYING
SUBCRITICAL WATER EXTRACTION: VERY LOW VALUES
EXTRACTION OF 80-95 % OF LIPIDS THAT CAN BE TRANSFORMED INTO BIODIESEL
BIOMASS ( 3-5 g/l)
1st STAGE: CONCENTRATION 2nd STAGE: EXTRACTION: SOLVENTS
CHALLENGE: IMPROVE THE OIL EXTRACTION SYSTEM …………..avoiding biomass drying, using non-toxic solvents
SELECTION OF SUITABLE STRAINS ESTABLISHMENT OF INDOOR CULTURE CONDITIONS THAT ALLOW GOOD
PRODUCTIVITY LEVELS (Fames>30% of Dry Weight) HIGH EXTRACTION YIELDS (85-95%) FROM FRESH BIOMASS BIOGAS AS A COPRODUCT: ENERGY ENRICHED BIOMASS
LIMITATION: OUTDOOR CULTURE CONDITIONS MAINTENANCE TO ACHIEVE
SUITABLE PRODUCTIVITY LEVELS
THE HETEROTROPHIC CULTURE SYSTEM WILL BE ABLE TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF LOW PRODUCTIVITY AND THE
OPERATIONAL LIMITATIONS DURING THE SCALE-UP
LIMITATIONS: COST OF CULTURE MEDIA USE OF CARBON SOURCES DESTINATED FOR FOOD
PARAMETERS CONTROL DURING THE SCALE-UP
THEORETICAL DATA
Promote the use of microalgae as renewable energy source through the improvement of their economic viability and the sustainability of the process under the basic premise of “zero residues” How? Proposing an scheme based on the circular economy, where the generated
wastes are used as nutrient source in the same culture process By diversifying the added value products that are obtained in the
Chemical, Energy, and Agriculture and Livestock industries. Creating a Dynamic Map that will allow the cross-border cooperation and the
complementarity between economic activities
Specific Actions
negative environmental impacts raw material waste greenhouse gas emissions large investments poorly efficient processes Low value added products are generated;
difficult management
composting biogas Landfill sites
URBAN SOLID WASTE 450 kg person-1 year-1
50% organic waste
PROTEIN/Aminoacids
MONOSACCHARIDES
USW1 SOYBEAN WASTE RAPESEED
WASTE SUNFLOWER
WASTE MICROALGAE
WASTE
PROTEIN % HYDROLYSIS 76 83,5 73 78 65 [AA] (mg/mL) Supernatant 19 124 149 144 92
CARBOHIDRATES % HYDROLYSIS - 92 92 87 96
[glucose] (mg/mL) Supernatant - 79 90 72 63
PROTEIN Aminoacids
WASTE 1
MONOSACCHARIDES
MEDIA CULTURE
BIOMASS CHARACTERIZATION
PROTEIN HYDROLYSIS 50 ºC; pH: 7
FILTERING
120 ºC, 5-20 min
CARBOHYDRATE HYDROLYSIS 50 ºC; pH: 7
FILTERING WASTE 2
1 Urban Solid Waste
Table 1. Hydrolysates chemical composition.
Algae Rapessed Total N (%) 0.99 0.89 Free Amino N (%) 5.50 5.44 Protein (%) 0.7 5.56 Carbon (%) 12.60 6.68 Phosphorus (%) 0.23 0.17 Potassium (%) 0.11 0.98
Hydrolysate Composition
Table 2. Culture media composition
Composition 100 ml Erlenmeyer
5 L Fermentor
Nitrogen (g/L)*
Total N 0.2 0.3
Glucose (g/L) 10 30-40 Sea salts (g/L) 10 5 * N is provided by hydrolysates AH and RH or by Yeast Extract
Figure 1. Biomass productivity and lipid content in a 4-days culture experiment. (A). Biomass productivity was enhanced by using hydrolysates compared with yeast extract (control). (B). Lipid content in biomass was also enhaced, specially for the DHA-producing microalga S.limacinum.
Figure 1. Biomass productivity and lipid content in a 4-days culture experiment. (A). Biomass productivity was enhanced by using hydrolysates compared with yeast extract (control). (B). Lipid content in biomass was also enhaced, specially for the DHA-producing microalga S.limacinum.
Chlorella protothecoides
C. Protothecoides Rapeseed
FATTY ACIDS % %
Mirystic (C14:0) 0,87 tr.
Pentadecanoic (C15:0) 0,19 -
Palmitic (C16:0) 13,18 5
Palmitoleic (C16:1) 0,28 0,3
C16:2 ?? 0,03 -
Margaroleic (C17:1) 0,18 -
Stearic (C18:0) 3,00 2,2
Oleic (C18:1)n-9 63,09 57
Linoleic (C18:2)n6 13,90 20,5
Linolenic (C18:3)n3 1,90 9
Arachidic (C20:0) 0,31
4,4 GadoleicC-20-1 0,09
c-22-5 n-6 0,56
c-22-6 n3 2,42
100,00
ADEQUATE PROFILE FOR BIODIESEL
SELECTION OF SUITABLE STRAINS (Chlorella protothecoides) ESTABLISHMENT OF CULTURES CONDITIONS THAT ALLOW
GOOD PRODUCTIVITY LEVELS (Fames>50% of Dry Weight)). SCALE UP
HIGH EXTRACTION YIELDS (85-95%) FROM FRESH BIOMASS CIRCULAR ECONOMY: REUSE OF AGROFOOD WASTES
(SUSTAINABILITY) AND RESIDUAL BIOMASS (“CRADEL TO CRADEL”, PREMISE OF “ZERO RESIDUES”)
ADDED VALUE PRODUCTS
POSSIBLE INDUSTRIALIZATION PROCESSES?? LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT
Ashes FAMEs
Polar Lipids
Carbohydrates
Proteins
Proteins
Carbohydrates
Polar Lipids
FAMEs Ashes
Biomass 200 Kg DW 9,5% Protein; 1,5% N
3 Kg N 1,5 Kg N
EXTRACTION 40,5% Oil
81 Kg
Residue 120 kg DW 15,73% Protein; 2,51% N---- 3 Kg N
60 % hydrolysis
HYDROLYSIS Remaing
solids
Hydrolysate 1,8 Kg N
(+ Glc soluble)
Chlorella protothecoides
Nitrogen Limitation
Nitrogen Available
The project has been 65% cofinanced by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the Interreg V-A Spain-France-Andorra programme (POCTEFA 2014-2020). POCTEFA
aims to reinforce the economic and social integration of the French–Spanish–Andorran border. Its support is focused on developing economic, social and environmental cross-border activities
through joint strategies favouring sustainable territorial development.
Número de diapositiva 1Número de diapositiva 2Número de diapositiva 3Número de diapositiva 4Número de diapositiva 5Número de diapositiva 6Número de diapositiva 7Número de diapositiva 8Número de diapositiva 9Número de diapositiva 10Número de diapositiva 11Número de diapositiva 12Número de diapositiva 13Número de diapositiva 14Número de diapositiva 15Número de diapositiva 16Número de diapositiva 17Número de diapositiva 18Número de diapositiva 19Número de diapositiva 20Número de diapositiva 21Número de diapositiva 22Número de diapositiva 23Número de diapositiva 24Número de diapositiva 25Número de diapositiva 26Número de diapositiva 27