Upload
houston-a-challenge
View
229
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Preparing to Dream Talking Points
Citation preview
THE CHANGING FACE OF HOUSTON:Tracking the Economic and Demographic Trans-formations Through 29 Years of Houston Surveys
STEPHEN L. KLINEBERGPreparing to Dream Spring Institute
May 5, 2010
Supported by local foundations, corporations, and individuals, and now housed in Rice’s Institute for Urban Research, the
annual surveys have interviewed 29 scientifically selected successive representative samples of Harris County residents.
In May 1982, just two months after the first Houston Area Sur- vey was completed, the 80-year oil boom suddenly collapsed.
The region recovered from the deep and prolonged recession of the mid 1980s to find itself squarely in the midst of . . .
• a restructured economy and • a demographic revolution.
These are the same transformations that are refashioning all of American society. The Houston surveys have tracked area residents’ changing perspectives on these remarkable trends.
THE HOUSTON AREA SURVEY (1982-2010)
FIGURE 1: POSITIVE RATINGS OF JOB OPPOR-TUNITIES IN THE HOUSTON AREA (1982-2010)
38
27
18
31
48
52
67
52
57
4947
38
60
53
50
4039
67
7372
4140
2729
4546
11
41
76
05
1015202530354045505560657075808590
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 OO O1 O2 O3 O4 O5 O6 O7 O8 O9 10
Year of Survey
Perc
ent G
ivin
g Po
sitiv
e Ra
tings
Percent rating job opportunities in the Houston area as either "excellent" or "good."
FIGURE 2: NEGATIVE RATINGS OF JOB OP-PORTUNITIES IN RELATION TO THE OFFI- CIAL UNEMPLOYMENT RATES (1982-2010)
23
58
71
87
80
65
56
49
4246
42
56
52 52
65
70
54
43
58 5659
3638
48
30
23
30
25
50
6.3
5.9
6.3
4.7
6.7
9.810.1
9.6
7.8
8.3
5.2 5.2
7.8
7.1
6.0
5.75.6
4.4 4.3
4.8
4.1 4.1
4.5
5.96.0
6.4
6.8
8.5
7.0
0
51015
20253035404550
55606570
7580
859095
100
105
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 OO O1 O2 O3 O4 O5 O6 O7 O8 O9 10
Year of Survey
Perc
ent G
ivin
g N
egat
ive
Rat
ings
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
8.5
9
9.5
10
10.5
11
Offi
cial
Une
mpl
oym
ent R
ates
Percent rating "job opportunities" in the Houstonarea as only "fair" or "poor," in comparison withthe official unemployment rates in Harris County.
(Negative ratings ofjob opportunities)
(Official Unem-ployment rates in Harris County)
FIGURE 3: “WHAT IS THE BIGGEST PROBLEM IN THE HOUSTON AREA TODAY?” (1982-2010)
11
3
33
2327
20
2421
31
19
25
1820
59
45
2421
13
31
40
13
48
3334
31
2222
12
28
2426
35
25
20
87
43
98
8
37
4143
51
15121412
37
42
60
38
44
15
1013
98
121110
26
10
72
19
3435
60
49
39
24
36
1815
131110
17
11
6
1413
26
54
65
73
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 OO O1 O2 O3 O4 O5 O6 O7 O8 O9 10
Year of Survey
Perc
ent o
f Res
pond
ents
Traffic Economy Crime
(Traffic.)
(Economy.)
(Crime.)
FIGURE 4: PERCENT DOING BETTER FINAN-CIALLY IN LAST FEW YEARS AND EXPECTING TO DO BETTER IN NEXT FEW YEARS (1982-2010)
41
37
40
3235
4442
20
31
48
45
4947
40
34
37
31
35
32
41
37
31
3233
38
4243
4748
52
5860
56
626060
6264
59
65
5758
53
58
49
5351
605962
5858
60
666363
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 OO O1 O2 O3 O4 O5 O6 O7 O8 O9 10
Year of Survey
Perc
ent S
ayin
g, "
Bette
r."
Personal financial situation has been "getting better" during the last few years.
Think that will be "better off" financially three or four years down the road.
(Next few years.)
(Last few years.)
(r=-.005, n.s.)
(r=-.026, p.=.001)
FIGURE 5: RATINGS OF THE HOUSTON AREA IN GENERAL AS A PLACE TO LIVE (1996-2010)
66.572.1 71.4 71.4
75.4
81.7
32.827.2 27.7 27.5
23.517.7
05
101520253035404550556065707580859095
100105
1996 2001 2004 2006 2008 2010
Year of Survey
Perc
ent o
f Res
pond
ents
Excellent/Good Fair/Poor"How would you rate the Houston area in general as a place to live?" (r=+.079, p.=.000)
THE RESTRUCTURED ECONOMY
The “resource economy” of the industrial era, for which this city was so favorably positioned, has been replaced by a new high-tech, knowledge-based, fully worldwide marketplace.
The traditional “blue collar path” to financial security has now
largely disappeared. Almost all the good-paying jobs today re- quire high levels of technical skills and educational credentials.
In 2010, 67% of the survey respondents agreed that “There are very few good jobs in today’s economy for people without a college education.” In the 2008 survey, 74% disagreed that “A high school education is enough to get a good job.”
In this increasingly unequal, hourglass economy, “What you earn,” as the saying goes, “depends on what you’ve learned.”
FIGURE 6: TWO CONTRASTING QUARTER-CENTURIES SINCE WORLD WAR II
116
4
100
9
111
13
114
22
99
46
86
68
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
The Postwar Quarter-Century (1949-1979) The Millennial Quarter-Century (1979-2003)
Perc
ent I
ncre
ase
in B
efor
e-Ta
x In
com
es
Bottom 20% Second 20% Middle 20% Fourth 20% Top 20% Top 5%
Percent Increases in Before-Tax Household IncomesSource: U.S. Census; Robert H. Frank. 2007. Falling Behind. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 10-11.
FIGURE 7: CHANGING PERSPECTIVES ON THE AMERICAN ECONOMY (1994-2010)
72
57
43
50
56
79
6561
66
60
57
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Year of Survey
Perc
ent o
f Res
pond
ents
Agree: There are enough good jobs for all welfare recipients who really want to work.
Best way to reduce crime is to spend the money on poverty and schools (rather than more prisons).
Believe own overall standard of living is or will be higher than parents' standard of living.
(r=-.158, p.=.000)
(r=+.182, p.=.000)
(r=+.034, p.=.028)
(Own living standards will be higher than parents'.)
(Enough good jobs for all on welfare who want to work.)
(Spend the money on poverty, schools; not prisons.)
THE DEMOGRAPHIC REVOLUTION
Along with the major immigration capitals of L.A. and N.Y.C., and closely following upon Miami, San Francisco, and Chi- cago, Houston is at the forefront of the new diversity that is refashioning the socio-political landscape of urban America. Throughout all of its history . . .
• this was essentially a bi-racial Southern city,• dominated and controlled, in an automatic, taken-
for-granted way, by white men.
Today . . .• Houston is one of the most culturally diverse metro-
politan areas in the country, and• all of its ethnic communities are now “minorities.”
FIGURE 8: THE DEMOGRAPHIC TRANSFOR-MATIONS OF HARRIS COUNTY (1960-2008)
Source: U.S. Census (www.census.gov); classifications based on Texas State Data Center conventions; total populations are given in parentheses; *from the 2008 Official Population Estimates.
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
1960(1,243,258)
1970(1,741,912)
1980(2,409,547)
1990(2,818,199)
2000(3,400,578)
2008, est.*(3,984,349)
Popu
latio
n, in
Mill
ions
Anglos Blacks Hispanics Asians/Others
6.0% 19.8%
9.9%
20.1%
69.2%
15.5%
19.7%
62.7%
22.7%
19.1%
54.0%
6.7%
32.9%
18.2%
42.1%
6.7%
39.3%
17.9%
36.0%
73.9%
0.3%
0.8%
2.1%
4.1%
INTERACTIONS OF ETHNICITY AND AGE
The other demographic revolution: the remarkable “aging,” or “graying,” of the American population.
Today’s seniors are primarily Anglos, as are the 76 million Americans born between 1946 and 1964, now aged 46 to 64. In the next 30 years, the numbers over age 65 will double.
The younger cohorts, who will replace the “Baby Boomers,” are disproportionately non-Anglo and far less privileged.
The “aging of America” is thus a division not only by genera- tion, but also by socioeconomic status and ethnic background.
Nowhere is this ongoing transformation more clearly seen than in the age distributions of the Harris County population.
FIGURE 9: THE PROPORTIONS IN FOUR AGE GROUPS WHO ARE ANGLO, BLACK, LATINO, AND ASIAN OR OTHER (2006-2010, COMBINED)
60.0
41.5
23.6
19.2 19.1
24.622.7
16.0
28.4
45.1
2.34.9 5.5
8.6
67.3
11.2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
Ages 60-93 (N=941) Ages 45-59 (N=1,092) Ages 30-44 (N=785) Ages 18-29 (N=556)
Perc
ent o
f Res
pond
ents
Anglos Blacks Hispanics Asians/Others
FIGURE 10: MEASURES OF SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS AMONG LATINO IMMIGRANTS BY TIME IN U.S. AND BY GENERATION (1994-2010)
24
17
26
39
25 2523 24
34
49
29
50
39
45
52
70
34
71
4954
6972
37
70
5659
77
83
44
68
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
Education beyondhigh school.
Household incomegreater than $35,000.
Uses a computer atwork or home.
Has health insurancefor self and family.
Lives in the suburbs,outside the city.
Owns the placewhere lives.
Perc
ent o
f Res
pond
ents
In U.S. 0-9 years (N=1,238) In U.S. 10-19 years (N=1,213) In U.S. 20+ years (N=1,034)
2nd generation (N=1,524) 3rd+ generation (N=2,392)
FIGURE 11: INDICATORS OF ASSIMILATION AMONG LATINO IMMIGRANTS BY TIME IN THE U.S. AND BY GENERATION (1994-2010)
18
84
6467
45
78
27
78
6872
40
84
55
49
5753
31
63
87
30
43
34
26
59
92
18
3429
15
48
05
101520253035404550556065707580859095
100105110115120125
The interview wasconducted in English,rather than Spanish.
Respondent thinks ofself as primarily
Hispanic.
Preschoolers likely tohave problems later if
both parents work.
A disapproved-ofbook should be kept
out of public libraries.
The U.S. should admitmore immigrants inthe next ten years.
Three closest friendsin Houston are all
Hispanics.
Perc
ent o
f Res
pond
ents
In U.S. 1-9 years (N=1,229) In U.S. 10-19 years (N=1,202) In U.S. 20+ years (N=1,021)
2nd generation (N=1491) 3rd+ generation (N=2,294)
FIGURE 12: CHANGING ASSESSMENTS OF HOUSTON’S ETHNIC DIVERSITY (1994–2010)
61
49
6664
5957
69
60
69
6563
54
6264
6967
5557
52
39
44
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Year of Survey
Perc
ent o
f Res
pond
ents
The increasing diversity will become a source of great strength (not a growing problem) for the city.
The increasing ethnic diversity, due to immigration, is a good thing (rather than a bad thing).
The increasing immigration mostly strengthens (rather than threatens) American culture.
(r=+.020, n.s.)
(r=+.082, p.=.000)
(r=+.039, p.=.021)
(Source of strength.)(A good thing.)
(Strengthens American culture.)
FIGURE 13: SUPPORT FOR GAY RIGHTS (FROM 1991 THROUGH 2010)
59
66
56
60
48
19
38
2927 26
4143
52
36
52
64
73
3741
3430
32
43
37
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Year of Survey
Perc
ent o
f Res
pond
ents
Favor: Allowing homosexuals to teach in the public schools. [r=+.094, p.=.000]
Favor: Homosexuals being legally permitted to adopt children. [r=+.215,p.=.000]
Favor: Alowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the military. [r=+.185, p.=000]
Agree: Give homosexual marriages same legal status as heterosexual marriages. [r=+.050, p.=.000]
(Gays teaching.)
(Gays in military.)
(Gay marriage.)
(Gay adoptions.)
CONCLUSIONS: HOUSTON AND AMERICA FACE SOME FORMIDABLE CHALLENGES
This city and nation will need to nurture a far more educated workforce, and fashion policies that can reduce the growing inequalities and prevent the rise of a new urban underclass.
To attract the most innovative companies and talented indi- viduals, Houston will need to grow into a more environmen- tally appealing urban destination, and develop the research centers that will fuel the critical drivers of the new economy.
If the region is to flourish in the 21st century, it will need to develop into a much more unified and inclusive multiethnic society, one in which equality of opportunity is truly made available to all citizens and all of its communities are invited to participate as full partners in shaping the Houston future.
The “Institute for Urban Research” at Rice UniversityProfessor Stephen L. Klineberg, Co-Director713-348-3484 or [email protected]
Contact Rice University (at: [email protected]; or call713-348-4225) for copies of the following publications: * the report on the first 24 years of Houston surveys (Public Perceptions in Remarkable Times, 2005) * the report on survey findings in the six major sectors of the greater Houston area (Regional Perspectives, 2007)
For further information, or to download additional reports and PowerPoint slides, please visit the Institute’s websites, at: www.iur.rice.edu or www.houstonareasurvey.org
CONTACT INFORMATION