Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Preparing for the FY2017 HUD CoC Competition
WV Balance of State Continuum of CareJune 28, 2017
1:00 pm Bridgeport Conference Center
Purpose
The purpose of today’s meeting is to describe the NOFA process in the BoS and the opportunities to continue progress on ending homelessness
Agenda
What’s New & Important in this year’s NOFA
Planning, Performance, and Outcomes
Performance Measures
Ranking and Rating Process
AcronymsCoC - Continuum of Care
NOFA - Notice of Funding Availability
RRH - Rapid Rehousing
RRH-TH - Rapid Rehousing - Transitional Housing
PSH - Permanent Supportive Housing
CH - Chronic Homelessness
FPRN - Final Pro Rata Need Amount
GIW - Grant Inventory Worksheet
ARD - Annual Renewal Demand (whole CoC)
ARA - Annual Renewal Amount (individual project applicant)
Important Items to Note
24 CFR 578 - Continuum of Care Interim Rule (Interim rules are in effect)
CoC Program Start Up Training Webinars https://www.hudexchange.info/training-events/courses/coc-program-start-up-training-webinars-for-fy-2013-funds/
FY2017 Competition page http://bit.ly/2u9M6Pl
2017 Program NOFA
Registration Notice Release Data: April 10, 2017
GIW Due Date: May 4, 2017
CoC Review Deadline: June 2, 2017
GIW Finalized and Posted: June 6, 2017
NOFA Release Data: ?
Bonus Funding Available: ?
HUD doesn’t decide how much money to invest in homeless
programs, Congress does!
FY2017 spending bill was signed into law May 4, 2017. The bill provides for $2.383 billion for
Homeless Assistance grants, which represents an increase of $133
million from FY2016.
2017 CoC Program NOFA
The FY2017 Registration Notice is very similar to FY2016.
Focuses more on HMIS data through and the submission of system level performance reports.
CoC’s must still prioritize projects into two tiers.
It is also expected that communities have a performance-based project review and ranking process again this year.
Planning as a System
Using costs, performance, and outcome data, CoCs should improve how resources are utilized to end homelessness. CoCs should have a process in place to comprehensively review project quality, performance, and cost effectiveness measures that determine the extent to which EACH CoC funded program addresses the requirements of the CoC Interim Rule and the HEART Act.
2017 CoC NOFA Registration Notice
Performance as a System
FY2017 Program funding will be prioritized to CoCs that demonstrate capacity to reallocate funding in the competition.
At least 20% of the CoC’s total ARD between FY2013 and FY2017 from lower performing to higher performing projects.
WV BoS is currently at 22% being reallocated from FY2013 to FY2016.
How do we use the NOFA to make our System Better?
Reduce Homelessness
1. Reduce unsheltered homelessness
2. Reduce length of time people experience homelessness
3. Increase exits from the homeless system to permanent housing
How do we know/evaluate?Are projects aligned with Housing First?
How does our community prioritize the most vulnerable?
Do we have enough rapid re-housing?
Do we have enough crisis beds?
Is transitional housing being used for the people who need it most?
Which projects are performing well on these outcomes?
Which projects are the most cost-effective?
Intention of System Performance Measures
Ensure common understanding of system intent and goals, along with the projects that make up the CoC’s system
Focus on measuring the cumulative impact of programs, not just their individual impact
Help CoCs gauge their progress toward preventing and ending homelessness
Help HUD gauge progress on Federal goals
Identify areas for improvement
Meet HEARTH requirements
CoC Performance To-Date
Measure One: Length of Time Person Remains Homeless
“This measures the number of clients active in the report date range across ES, SH (Metric 1.1) and then ES, SH and TH (Metric 1.2) along with their average and median length of time homeless. This includes time homeless during the report date range as well as prior to the report start date, going back no further than October, 1, 2012."
Measure One: Length of Time Person Remains Homeless
Metric 1.1: Change in the average and median length of time persons are homeless in ES and SH projects. Metric 1.2: Change in the average and median length of time persons are homeless in ES, SH, and TH projects
a. This measure is of the client’s entry, exit, and bed night dates strictly as entered in the HMIS system.
October 1, 2015-September 30, 2016
Measure One: Length of Time Person Remains Homeless
b. Due to changes in DS Element 3.17, metrics for measure (b) will not be reported in 2016.
"This measure includes data from each client’s “Length of Time on Street, in an Emergency Shelter, or Safe Haven” (Data Standards element 3.17) response and prepends this answer to the client’s entry date effectively extending the client’s entry date backward in time. This “adjusted entry date” is then used in the calculations just as if it were the client’s actual entry date."
"NOTE: Due to the data collection period for this year’s submission, the calculations for this metric are based on the data element 3.17 that was active in HMIS from 10/1/2015 to 9/30/2016. This measure and the calculation in the SPM specifications will be updated to reflect data element 3.917 in time for next year’s submission."
Measure Two: the extent to which persons who exit PH return to homelessness
“This measures clients who exited SO, ES, TH, SH or PH to a permanent housing destination in the date range two years prior to the report date range. Of those clients, the measure reports on how many of them returned to homelessness as indicated in the HMIS for up to two years after their initial exit."
Measure Three: the number of homeless persons
“This measures the change in PIT counts of sheltered and unsheltered homeless persons as reported on the PIT (not from HMIS).”
Metric 3.1 - Change in PIT Counts
Measure Three: the number of homeless persons
Metric 3.2 - Change in Annual Counts
Measure four: Employment and income growth for homeless persons in CoC Program-funded projects
Metric 4.1 - Change in earned income for adult system stayers during the reporting period
Measure four: Employment and income growth for homeless persons in CoC Program-funded projects
Metric 4.2 - Change in non-employment cash income for adult system stayers during the reporting period
Measure four: Employment and income growth for homeless persons in CoC Program-funded projects
Metric 4.3 - Change in total income for adult system stayers during the reporting period
Measure four: Employment and income growth for homeless persons in CoC Program-funded projects
Metric 4.4 - Change in earned income for adult system leavers
Measure four: Employment and income growth for homeless persons in CoC Program-funded projects
Metric 4.4 - Change in earned income for adult system leavers
Measure four: Employment and income growth for homeless persons in CoC Program-funded projects
Metric 4.5 - Change in non-employment cash income for adult system leavers
Measure four: Employment and income growth for homeless persons in CoC Program-funded projects
Metric 4.6 - Change in total income for adult system leavers
Measure five: number of people who become homeless for the first time.
Metric 5.1 - Change in the number of persons entering ES, SH, and TH projects with no prior enrollments in HMIS.
Measure five: number of people who become homeless for the first time.
Metric 5.2 - Change in the number of persons entering ES, SH, TH, and PH projects with no prior enrollments in HMIS.
Measure six: homeless prevention and housing placement of persons defined by category 3 of HUD’s homeless definition in CoC program-funded projects
This measure is not applicable to CoCs in 2016.
Measure seven: successful placement from street outreach and successful placement in or retention of permanent housing
Metric 7a.1 - Change in exits to permanent housing destinations.
Measure seven: successful placement from street outreach and successful placement in or retention of permanent housing
Metric 7b.1 - Change in exits to permanent housing destinations.
Measure seven: successful placement from street outreach and successful placement in or retention of permanent housing
Metric 7b.2 - Change in exit to retention of permanent housing.
CoC Performance
CoCs must establish local targets and then will be held to meeting and exceeding targets.
Starting in FY2017 CoCs are going to be asked annually in the NOFA about their System Performance.
Annual Collaborative Application scoring will rely heavily on the progress CoCs make in meeting/exceeding their targets.
%
The importance of system performance data in scoring the CoC application will be ramping up over time. Right now the "stakes are low" but as data quality improves it will be increasingly impactful on CoC scores.
The two biggest data quality issues HUD sees from the baseline measures submitted last year are:
1. too many "exits to unknown"
2. not enough data to de-duplicate numbers.
Knowing What We Need
CoCs are required to do a gaps analysis or look at your current data to determine need:
Not a WISH-LIST
Utilize PIT, HIC, and other related data, an evaluation of project performance, and meaningful consumer input to determine the CoC’s needs
Data-Informed process to help align what mix of interventions are needed to achieve outcomes.
2017 BoS PIT ResultsEmpty beds everywhere!
488
79
588
168 195
100
831
146
672
168215
514
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Emergency Shelter TransitionalHousing PermanentSupportiveHousing
RapidRehousing OtherPermanentHousing
PersonsUnshelteredVs.AvailableBedsonany
givennight
2017PointinTimeCountAvailableBedsvs.Utilization
Persons Beds
Current NeedWV BoS CoC Prioritization List
FY2017 Competition
Who to serve by project type?
CoC Permanent HousingPermanent Supportive Housing &
CoC Rapid RehousingCoC Transitional Housing
Category 1 - Literally HomelessIf coming from TH to PSH, they must
have originally came from the streets or ES, not from another TH or from
Category 2
Category 1 - Literally Homeless
Category 2 - At imminent Risk of Homelessness
Category 4 - Fleeing Domestic Violence Category 4 - Fleeing Domestic Violence
Programs Funded Under the CoC will…
promote community-wide commitment to the goal of ending homelessness,
rehouse homeless individuals and families rapidly while minimizing the trauma and dislocation caused by homelessness,
promote access to effective use of mainstream programs,
optimize self-sufficiency for program participants,
operate other homeless service programs in accordance to the CoC priorities and performance expectations.
Letter of Intent
Process by which new projects express interest in CoC funding.
Simple form and narrative to submit.
Deadline extended to June 15, 2017.
Deadline extended today through July 10, 2017.
Reallocation
Reallocation moves funding from renewal projects to create one or more new projects.
Reasons to consider reallocation:
Project no longer meets community need
Project performs poorly on the Big 3 Performance Measures
Project consistently returns money to HUD and/or is under-utilized on a regular basis
Project Types to be created through Reallocation
Permanent Supportive Housing
Rapid Rehousing
Joint TH-RRH component
SSO for Centralized Intake
HMIS
Potential Bonus
Project?Permanent Supportive Housing
Rapid RehousingJoint TH-RRH
Joint TH-RRH
Combines Transitional Housing and Rapid Rehousing into a single project to serve individuals and families experiencing homelessness
The only information we have to date on this project type is in the Registration Notice.
Joint TH-RRH
Provide low-barrier, temporary housing while individuals and families move quickly to permanent housing
Opportunity to create more crisis/temporary housing while individuals and families stabilize and move quickly with rapid re-housing dollars.
Client-driven: Clients chose how long they want to be temporarily housed before being rapidly re-housed
May offer different supports for different subpopulations (DV, Single Adults, Youth, etc.)
Joint TH-RRH Eligible Costs
Leasing or Operating Costs to provide Transitional Housing
Under Leasing, this would be an opportunity to implement a Transition in Place project
Short-term and medium-term Rental Assistance
Supportive Services
HMIS (for costs of entering into the CoC’s HMIS)
Administration
Ranking & Rating Process
CoC’s must use reallocation. It is not an option for CoC’s to continue to be funded at the current levels and not look at performance and reallocate lower performing projects
Reallocation
Can be voluntary or involuntary.
Projects can voluntarily elect to reallocate in which case HUD allows for communities to set local priorities to rank those new projects creates through reallocation higher on the Priority Listing.
Involuntary reallocation happens when a neutral decision making body conducts an objective, performance-based review of the project.
Projects can reallocate part of the project or the entire project.
Performance-Based Rank & Review
Very similar to FY2016.
One Performance Scorecard for ALL renewal projects
Examines a APR data, exits to PH, data quality, monitoring reports, participation in CoC initiatives, FY2015 recaptures.
Threshold for ranking is 57.5 points (50%)
Capacity Review
New Project Applications will undergo a Capacity Review, plus must meet the Threshold Criteria established in the NOFA.
Project Application
Projects passing the Performance Review and/or Capacity Review will be invited to complete the Project Application in e-snaps.
Projects will present, in-person, their Application to the Ranking and Rating Committee who will rank & tier projects in accordance to the NOFA.
Ranking will be based on the overall score of the Performance Scorecard and the accurate completion of the Project Application in e-snaps.
FY2017 Rank Order
1. HMIS
2. FY2016 New Projects not yet started (alphabetically by agency name) PSH, RRH, SSO
3. All other FY2017 applications meeting threshold criteria by % score (highest scoring to lowest scoring)
Tentative Schedule FY2017 Letters of Intent due to BoS CoC: [email protected] July 10
FY2016 CoC Competition Opens ?
Project Scorecards distributed to Renewal & New Applicants July 20
Project Applications Due in e-snaps to CoC 30 days prior to Competition deadline
In-Person Presentations approx. 25 days prior to deadline
Competition Deadline ?
CoC Notifies Projects 15 days prior to Competition deadline
Summary
CoCs are required to focus on outcomes and use data to determine need.
The FY2017 process is already underway.
This is a very time-limited, competitive process.
When in doubt, ask questions via the [email protected] email.
The HUD Field Office cannot provide guidance once the competition opens.
Questions?
Registration is Open
WVCEH Conference on Ending Homelessness
November 14 -16
Stonewall Resort
https://goo.gl/5rkMsc