Upload
jeffrey-wagers
View
1.952
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
1
Preparation for Outcome Monitoring
2
Presenters: 1. Jeff Wagers: Tx DSHS Program/
Training Specialist2. Ken Ripperger-Suhler, Ph D:University of Texas at Austin,
Researcher
3
Introductions
Presenters Audience Agenda Objectives
4
What is an Outcome?
The resulting changes in the client during or after a client attends an intervention.
5
Brainstorm-Outcomes!
1. What outcomes would you like to see in your
intervention?2. Each intervention will report
6
Agenda Review Basics of Interventions and OM Walk through a sample intervention from
logic model to analysis Readiness to do Outcome Monitoring Small Group Breakout by Intervention Administering surveys in a trusting
atmosphere Practice inputting survey data Data analysis and Implications Final questions and wrap-up
7
Objectives
Review basics of interventions and OM Discuss parameters and preparation for
OM in Summer 2010 Examine and assess OM pre/post surveys
by intervention Learn how to input and analyze data Brainstorm challenges and solutions to OM Reassess readiness to do OM
8
Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI)
Clearly defined audience, goals & objectives Based in behavioral theory Focused on specific risk behavior Could be an individual, group, or
community level intervention
9
Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI)
Individual-Level Interventions: CRCS
Group Level Interventions
Community Level Interventions
10
Key Terms Internal Logic Core elements Fidelity Behavioral Determinants/ Factors that
Influence Behavior/ Risk Factors Tailoring Adapting Reinventing
11
Behavioral Determinants; Factors Influencing Behavior (FIBs)
The “why” Reasons a client or
population is engaged in the risk behavior
Come from the client through: CRCS: asking clients
questions GLI, CLI: community
assessment Interventions focus on
the BD/FIB as well as the behavior
12
Program Evaluation
• What is evaluation?
• Why evaluate?
13
Program Evaluation Systematic, consistent collection of data Shows program effectiveness Accountability Program Improvement Increases Capacity Defines parameters Identifies unmet needs Process vs. outcomes
14
What is Process?
“How” you provide your intervention
Fidelity to the intervention Quality Assurance issues Skill level of agency staff Numbers (who attended, how many
sessions, # of target population, etc)
15
Process Questions
Is the location accessible? Is the program implemented as designed? Was the curriculum followed? How many of the target population attended
the sessions? How well is the RRS able to keep the session
focused on risk behavior? Was staff culturally competent? Others?
16
What is an Outcome?
The resulting changes in the client during or after a client attends an intervention.
17
Outcome Questions Did the client
Learn anything? Improve their skills? Change their behavior? Realize they are at risk of getting HIV?
18
Outcomes measure:
S - skillsK - knowledgeA - attitudeB - belief
B - behavior
19
Logic Models
20
Problem Statement
Risk Behaviors
Influencing Factors
Intervention/Activities
OutcomesImmediate Intermediate
Outcomes
Immediate Outcomes: Immediateresults of the intervention, such as changes in knowledge, attitudes,beliefs, and skills.- Increased perception of HIV risk- Increased condom use skills- Increased self efficacy to use condoms
Intermediate Outcomes: Intervention Results that occur some time after the intervention is completed, such as changes in behaviors, policies, and environmental barriers.
-Increased condom use-Decreased number of partners
21
STD rates are high among
young Hispanic MSM
Problem Statement
Young Hispanic MSM don’t
use condoms
Young Hispanic MSM have multiplepartners
Risk Behaviors
Young Hispanic MSM lack skills to properly
use condoms
Young Hispanic MSM don’t know how to
negotiate condom use with
their partners
Influencing Factors
Factors Influencing Behavior
It’s the norm for young Hispanic MSM
to have a lot of sex partners
22
STD rates are high among
young Hispanic MSM
Problem Statement
Young Hispanic MSM don’t
use condoms
Risk Behaviors
Young Hispanic MSM lack
skills to properlyuse condoms
Young HispanicMSM don’t know how to
negotiatecondom use with
their partners
Safe-sex negotiationscenarios &role plays
Self-assertionskills training
InterventionActivities
Influencing Factors
Intervention Activities
Young Hispanic MSM have multiplepartners
Condom skills demonstration and practice
23
Immediate and Intermediate Outcomes
Young Hispanic MSM lack
skills to properlyuse condoms
Young Hispanic MSM don’t
know how tonegotiate
condom use withtheir partners
Influencing Factors
Safe-sex negotiationscenarios &role plays
Self-assertionskills training
InterventionActivities
Immediate Outcomes
Young Hispanic MSM know how to
negotiate condom use with
their partners
Young Hispanic
MSMuse
condoms
Intermediate Outcomes
Condom demo and practice
Young Hispanic MSM know how to use condoms
24
Problem Statement
Risk Behaviors
Influencing Factors
Intervention/Activities
OutcomesImmediate Intermediate
Impacts
Impacts
Impacts: Long-term results ofone or more interventions overtime, such as changes in HIV infection, morbidity, and mortality
- Decreased HIV rates
25
Outcome Monitoring
Data CollectionAnd
Analysis
26
Steps to Outcome Monitoring Develop *SMART outcome objectives
Specific, Measurable, Appropriate, Realistic, Time-Based
Develop/ review/ modify surveys or other methods that collect outcomes
Gathering survey/ method data Input data into spreadsheets Analyze and report data (Outcome
Monitoring) Make program adjustments if needed
27
Example of Process ObjectiveProcess objective: “Clients will complete
SISTA”
Revised: “By December 31, 2010, 50 African-American women will complete SISTA as documented by client data system.”
28
Example of Outcome ObjectiveOutcome objective: “Clients who complete
SISTA will show an increase self efficacy”
Revised: “75% of participants who complete SISTA will increase self-efficacy to correctly put on a condom as measured by pre/post survey.”
29
Ways to Collect Outcomes
30
Collect Outcomes Skills
Correct condom use, needle-bleaching Negotiation, Communication, Assertiveness
Questions Knowledge Attitudes Beliefs Behaviors
31
Demonstrations and PracticeRole Plays
Measuring Skills
32
Demonstrations Examples:
Condom Use Skills Needle Bleaching Skills
Checklists Consistent Provide “clean” pre-test Demonstrate correct condom use Practice Next session, do a post-test and compare
results
33
Role Plays Examples:
Condom or bleaching negotiation skills Self Assertiveness skills
Observations: Consistent Provide “clean” pre-role play (or reverse role
play) Demonstrate correct method Practice Next session, do a post-role play and compare
results
34
Types of Questions Open Ended Closed Ended
True/False or Yes/No Fill in the Blank Likert Scale Frequency Indicator Multiple Choice
35
Question Answer Options
Answer Option Answer Code
True/False T/F
Yes/No Y/N
Fill in the Blank FB
Scale S
Frequency Indicators
FI
Open Ended OE
Multiple Choice MC
36
Sample Questions Perceived susceptibility
“Given my current behavior, I am worried that I might get HIV” (T/F) (Y/N)
“Given my current behavior, how worried am I that I might get HIV? (Scale)
1 2 3 45
Not worried Very worried
37
Sample Questions Expected outcome related to condom
use
“I will get HIV from my main partner without using a condom” (T/F) (Y/N)
“How likely is it that I will get HIV from my main partner without using a condom?”
1 2 3 45
Not likely at all Very likely
38
Steps to Outcome Monitoring Gathering survey data
Individual interviews Written questionnaires Focus groups
Input data into spreadsheets Analyze and report data (Outcome
Monitoring) Make program adjustments
39
Putting It All Together
40
Example-VOICES/VOCES
VOICES/ VOCES is a one-session group level intervention for HRH men and women in which groups watch culturally appropriate videos of condom negotiation, condom use and assertive communication, and practice.
Participants role-play condom use scenarios and practice putting on condoms
41
Logic Model
Increased Condom
Use
Increased Condom Use Knowledge
Increased Condom Use Self-Efficacy
Increased Condom Use
Intention
INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES(BEHAVIOR)
IMMEDIATE OUTCOMES
ACTIVITIESINFLUENCING FACTORS
Practice Condom Use;
Distribute condoms
ViewVideos;Condom
Negotiation Role Plays
RISK BEHAVIORS
Unprotected Sex
Condom Use Knowledge
Condom Use Self-Efficacy
Condom Use Intention
42
At least 40% of clients will demonstrate greater knowledge of condom usage by identifying on a written test at the end of the session the correct answer (yes or no) with regard to the following knowledge questions:
a. Are specific lubricants appropriate for use with condoms;
b. Whether or not to unroll a condom before putting it on a man’s penis.
Objective (Knowledge of Condom Use)
43
Survey Items (Knowledge of
Condom Use)
Yes NoDon’t Know
1. Vaseline and lotion are good lubricants for condoms/rubbers.
1 2 3
2. You should unroll a condom before putting it on a man’s penis.
1 2 3
44
Spreadsheet for storing data
Client ID
Race/
EthnicAge at intake Gender
Sexual Orient
HIV Status
Pre ConKnow
1
Pre ConKnow
2
A01 AA 30 M STR - yes yes
A02 AA 25 M BI - yes yes
A03 H 27 M GAY - yes yes
45
Frequencies Pre & PostItem Vaseline and lotion are good
lubricants for condoms/rubbers.
Yes(%)
No(%)
Don’t Know(%)
(PRE) 20(100%)
0(0%)
0(0%)
(POST) 0(0%)
20(100%)
0(0%)
46
Vaseline and lotion are good lubricants for condoms/rubbers.
Post Responses
Yes No Don’tKnow
Total
Pre Yes 0 20 0 20(100%)
Responses No 0 0 0 0(0%)
Don’t Know 0 0 0 0(0%)
Total 0 20 0 20(0%)
47
Frequencies Pre & PostItem You should unroll a condom before
putting it on a man’s penis.
Yes(%)
No(%)
Don’t Know(%)
(PRE) 20(100%)
0(0%)
0(0%)
(POST) 20(100%)
0(0%)
0(0%)
48
You should unroll a condom before putting it on a man’s penis.
Post Responses
Yes No Don’tKnow
Total
Pre Yes 20(100%)
0(0%)
0(0%)
20(100%)
Responses No 0(0%)
0(0%)
0(0%)
0(0%)
Don’t Know 0(0%)
0(0%)
0(0%)
0(0%)
Total 20(100%)
0(0%)
0(0%)
20(100%)
49
Table 1. Change in Knowledge Scores from Pre to PostItem %
correct post
% change
d to correct
% change
d to incorre
ct
% change
to correct answers
1. Vaseline and lotion are good lubricants for condoms/rubbers.
100 100 0 100
2. You should unroll a condom before putting it on a man’s penis.
0 0 0 0
50
Outcome Monitoring: VOICES/VOCES Report
Condom Use KnowledgeThe results of cross tab analysis find that 100% of clients showed increased
knowledge of appropriate lubricants for condom use.
0% of clients showed increased knowledge regarding when to unroll a condom to put on a man’s penis.
51
Planning for Outcome
Monitoring
52
Planning for Outcome Monitoring
Readiness for Outcome Monitoring
Done on an individual agency basis Stable implementation Data collection instruments
developed by Ken with agency input Outcomes may change over time
53
DSHS Parameters for Outcome Monitoring
1. Skills-building, knowledge, behavioral determinants ( AKA FIBs)
2. BD/ FIBs identified in your intervention based on research
3. Pre/post survey (unless an agency wants to do observations)
4. Based on logic model of intervention
3-4 outcomes for GLI
54
Some Differences in Data Collection…. CRCS
Intermediate and Immediate Outcomes Use questions from behavioral assessment No standardized survey One initial assessment, up to two
reassessments Driven by prevention plan and goals Designated outcomes Pre/post done on same individual Percentages for outcomes 15-50% Not all outcomes will apply to all individuals
55
Some Differences in Data Collection…. Group Level
Immediate Outcomes Pre/post tests Standardized survey 3-4 outcomes individualized per intervention Pre/post done on same individual Percentages for outcomes 40-75% Can measure any SKABB
56
Some Differences in Data Collection…. Community Level: 2 components
Group Component-measured first 2-4 outcomes Will measure M-Groups or training of peer
volunteers Standardized survey Pre/post; percentages 50-80% Knowledge, skill-level, able to communicate
very important Will be collected first stage
57
Some Differences in Data Collection…. Community Level:
Community Component-measured second 2-4 Outcomes Done during community assessment Pre/Post tests; Venue-based Mainly measures knowledge, attitudes,
beliefs, community norms Percentages up to 15% Gathered yearly Will be collected in second stage
58
Outcome Monitoring Surveys
Ask 3-4 questions per outcome 10-20 questions per survey Can measure skills through survey Knowledge can be a component Include key outcomes of intervention, in
line with behavioral determinants Consistent data collection
59
Facilitated Group Activity 11. CLI: Discuss group and community level
components of intervention
2. GLI: Discuss and review OM surveys by intervention
3. CRCS: Brainstorm problems and possible solutions to gathering OM data
60
Guided Group Discussion
Ways to Collect Outcomes1. Giving Instructions
2. Oral Interviews3. Written Questions
4. Focus Groups
61
Activity 2: Data Input and Analysis Input sample data into a spreadsheet
Sample data is located in packet Input into your laptop using the sample
spreadsheet (partner with someone if needed)
Analyze the data Spreadsheet calculates the data What can you determine from analysis?
62
Next Steps
Per intervention, brainstorm challenges and solutions to
Outcome Monitoring
63
Final Questions? Please complete
your course evaluations
Thank you for your participation!
64
Contact information Jeff Wagers, TxDSHS
[email protected] 512-533-3022
Ken Ripperger-Suhler, University of Texas [email protected] 254-624-1028