C )N lAK'IORESEARCHFOUNDATION

31F86SE95S4 2.7114 GRIFFITH 010

MATERIALS DIVISION Non-Metallic Minerals Centre

PREPARATION AND EVALUATION OF TWO DOLOMITE SAMPLES FROM EASTERN ONTARIO

Industrial Minerals Services . C.A. Booth Report No. IMS 63-40012-84 May 31, 1984

RECEIVED;for

Trisar ResourcesR.R. #3

Navon, Ontario . .. mc KOA 2SO MINING LANDS

Attention: Mr. G. Pearce

Mf T HF ONTARIO RESEARCH FOUNDATION STIPULATE THAT THIS DOCUMENT IS SUBJECT TO THE FOl LOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS:

1 ANV PROPOSAL CONTAINED HEREIN WAS PREPARED FOR THE CONS, DE R AT ION OF THE ADDRESSEE ONLY ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED BY NOR DISCLOSE D TO

, BY US WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NORMAL PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS NEITHER WE

NOROUREMPLOYEESSHALL BE RESPONSIBLE F OR AN Y L OSS OR DAM AGE R E SUL1 ING DIRECT L Y OR INDIRECT L Y F ROM AN Y DEFAULT, ERROR OR OMISSION

3 ANY REPORT. PROPOSAL OR QUOTATION PREPARED BY US REFERS ONLY TO THE PART ICULAR MATE R. AL. (NSTRUMENT OR OTHER SUB.IECT REFERRED TO IN IT. NO

REPRESENTATION IS MADE THAT SIMILAR ARTICLES WILL BE OF LIKE QUALITY.

4 NOREPORT ISSUED BY US SHALL BE PUBLISHED IN WHOLE OR IN PART WITHOUT OUR PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT

5 OUR NAME SHALL NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SALE, OFFER OR ADVERTISEMENT OF ANY ART ICE E . PROCESS OR SERVICE.

6 WE RESERVE THE RIGHT NOT TO COMMENCE AND/OR CONTINUE ANY WORK UNTIL PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS SATISFACTORY TO US ARE ESTABLISHED.

Trisar ResourcesReport No. IMS 63-40012-84

1. INTRODUCTION

Trisar Resources is currently Investigating a dolomite deposit located 1n Eastern Ontario for the commercial exploitation of its ore reserves. Trisar Resources anticipate that the material could find use as as a filler in paper and plastic products.

The Ontario Research Foundation was requested to prepare (by fine grinding methods) and to evaluate two samples of the ore, selected by Trisar Resources. This report describes the results of this testwork.

2. SAMPLE PREPARATION

2.1 Sample One

The first sample was initially crushed 1n a laboratory impact crusher using a gap setting of 6.4 mm and a rotor speed of 1,400 rpm. This "stock feed" was subsequently finely ground by the following methods:

2.1.1 Laboratory Ball Hill

A 2000 gm representative test sample of the "stock feed" was ground in a laboratory rubber-lined ball mill using Zirconia balls as the grinding medium. The objective of preparing this sample was to provide initial data on the quality of the dolomite.

The test sample was dry milled for eight hours and degritted using a 325 mesh (45 vim) test sieve. The minus 45 \m material was then wet milled for five hours using ethanol as the liquid medium. The finely ground material was subsequently filtered, air-dried and evaluated using the procedures described in Section 3 of this report.

Trlsar ResourcesReport No. IMS 63-40012-84

2.1.2 Pilot-Scale Dry Grinding and Classification

The remainder of the "stock feed" was finely ground 1n a "pilot size" fluid energy mill. The principle of operation of this mill Is described in Appendix B.

The "feed stock" was introduced to the fluid energy mill via a vibratory-controlled feeder. The product recovered from the cyclone collector (which contained the bulk of the material) was inspected for fineness. This product was found to have sufficient fineness after two further passes 1n the mill. Both the final cyclone and baghouse collector products were evaluated using the procedures described in Section 3 of this report.

2.2 Sample Two

The second field sample was Initially crushed in a laboratory impact crusher using a gap setting of 6.4 mm and a rotor speed of 1,400 rpm. The crushed material was split Into 1,800 gm lots and each lot was wet-milled for six hours in a rubber-lined ball mill. Zirconia balls and ethanol were used as the grinding and fluid media, respectively.

The ground material was recomblned, filtered, air-dried and classified using a 10 mm diameter hydrocyclone. Initial classification was performed using a cyclone pressure differential of 50 psi. A further classification of the initial underflow fraction was requested by Trisar Resources. This second classification was performed using a cyclone pressure differential of 30 psi.

The two overflow fractions (50 and 30 psi) and the second underflow fraction (30 psi) were thickened using a simple decantation

Trisar ResourcesReport No. IMS 63-40012-84

method. Care was taken to recover all fines. Representative allquots of the three fractions were evaluated.

3. Product Evaluation

The six test specimens prepared (described 1n Section 2 of this report) were evaluated for the following properties:

* Particle Size* Reflectance of Light* pHt Moisturet Oil Absorption

A brief description of the methods used to measure these properties is as follows:

3.1 Particle Size

The six samples were measured for particle size using the Coulter Counter technique. A representative portion of each sample was extracted and analyzed on the Coulter Counter TAIL The samples were diluted with Isoton II and subjected to 30 seconds In a low power, ultrasonic bath to aid particulate dispersion. For all samples, a multi-aperture tube technique was required to evaluate the complete particle size distribution.

3.2 Reflectance of Light

The six specimens were subjected to tristlmulus reflectance measurements. A single pellet was prepared for each specimen, using a Zeiss Powder Press. The tristlmulus values were measured by reference to magnesium oxide and under the Illumination of standard illuminant C (average daylight). Diffuse reflectance

TMsar ResourcesReport No. IMS 63-40012-84

values R , R , and R were determined with the three tr1st1mulus filters (FMX/C, FMY/C and FMZ/C). In the CIE system, (Commission International de 1'Eclalre), tr1st1mulus values refer to the basic stimulus E (equal energy spectrum). The tr1st1mulus values X, Y, and Z are derived from the following equations:

0,782 R x 0.198 RA

1.181

While all three values are required to define a color on the CIE chromaticity diagram, the Y tr1st1mulus value 1s all that 1s required to specify the lightness or brightness of a specimen.

3.3 pH. Oil Absorption and Moisture Content

The pH, oil absorption and moisture content was measured for the six specimens using the following methods:

t pH: ASTM DI 208

t Oil Absorption: ASTM 0281* Moisture Content: ASTM 280, Method A

All samples that were prepared using wet methods were dried at 1050C until constant weight was achieved prior to testing.

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The material balance for the samples prepared by the dry and wet milling methods are presented 1n Tables I and I I, respectively. The properties measured for each prepared sample are summarized in Table III.

Trisar ResourcesReport No. IMS 63-40012-84

The pH and moisture values appear to be typical of commercially available calcium carbonates. The oil absorption values, however, appear to be somewhat higher (commercially available carbonates typically absorb oil from 13.OX to 20.OX of their weight).

The Y tr1st1mulus values (which specify the brightness of the powdered sample) suggest that the dry milled material has been contaminated, possibly from abrasion of the mill casing. This problem could be rectified by utilizing a mill Uner, or by selecting a fluid energy mill that minimizes abrasion.

It should be noted that there are two lightness or brightness methods that are currently 1n practice 1n the mineral fillers industry: the Y value in the CIE system (Commission International de 1'Eclaire) and the L value 1n the Hunter Colour Scale. The relationship between the two scales is as follows:

Since both these systems are commonly practiced, 1t 1s imperative, when quoting brightness to make reference to the system used.

Based on the CIE brightness values shown 1n Table III, all of the wet milled material is comparable to commercially available carbonates in brightness.

The particle size values summarized 1n Table III are defined as follows:

t DIQ : the particle size (um) that 10X V/V of the material 1s smaller than.

t DSO : the median particle size ( \an)

Trisar ResourcesReport No. IMS 63-40012-84

. the particle size (unt) that 90X v/v of thematerial 1s smaller than.

A detailed description of the measured particle s ize distribution for the six samples 1s presented in Appendix A.

Based on the median particle sizes, filler and coating grade carbonate products could be made from the Eastern Ontario Deposit. It should be noted, however, that further testwork may be specified by the potential consumers of this material.

It should also be pointed out that the bulk of the wet ground products were thickened and not dried. This procedure was conducted to prevent any caking and/or agglomeration that may occur in the dry state. If dry samples are required, it 1s advisable to take steps to ensure that minimal caking and/or agglomeration occurs during the drying operation..

ACraig A. BoothAssociate Research Scientist

/gb

Ivan UT Joyce, Manager Non-Metallic Minerals Centre

Trisar Resources Report No. 63-40012-84 8

TABLE I

MATERIAL BALANCE FOR DRY MILLING AND CLASSIFICATION TEST RUN

F R

Pass (

1

2 3

TOTAL

eed FEED Cate Wt. Dist. h kg/hr.) (kg) (X) (h

189.5 154.7 100.0 IE

29.0 153.2 99.0 14 35.7 143.0 92.4 12

154.7 100.0 12

TABLE

,YCLONE BAGHOUSE LOSSIt. Dist. Wt. -g) W ( kg)

.3.2 99.0 1.4

3.0 92.4 8.4 4.7 80.6 7.3

'4.7 80.6 17.1

II

Dist. Wt. Dist.W . (kg) W

0.9 0.1 0.1

5.4 1.8 1.2 4.7 11.0 7.1

11.0 12.9 8.4

MATERIAL BALANCE FOR WET MILLINGAND CLASSIFICATION TEST RUN

Pulp Pressure S. G

(psi) (g/m

50 1.5 30 1.8

FEED OVESolids Pulp

Wt. Dist. S. G. D (kg) ( 1} ( g/nt)

9 34.6 100.0 1.09 3 18.4 100.0 1.20

RFLOWSolids

Wt. Dist.(kg) (X)

22.3 7.1 10.3 8.4

UNDERFLOWPulp SolidsS. G. Wt. Dist, (g/nt) (kg) (X)

2.02 12.3 92.9 2.17 8.1 91.6

TABLE III

SUMMARY OF PROPERTIES FOR EACH SAMPLE

Test Sample

Lab Ball MillJet Mill Prod.

Jet Mill Baghouse

Ball Mill O/ F 50 psi

Ball Mill O/ F 30 psiBall Mill U/F 30 psi

PH

8.99.49.2

9.5

9.69.5

Moisture (55 Wt.)

0.180.050.17

0.13

0.05

0.01

Oil Absorption (%-Lbs.)

16.020.424.8

21.5

20.019.8

TRISTI

X

89.4

81.981.3

88.0

89.0

90.0

MULUS VAY

91.283.682.9

89.8

90.891.8

LUES

l

105.2

97.997.7

103.9

104.6106.2

PARTICLE SIZE (u)D10

1.32.11.1

1.0

1.65.3

D50

3.77.42.0

2.1

5.014.0

D90

9.618.53.5

8.7

15.630.7

73 -H ft) -S-D -J- O Vi-S O) rt "S

Z 70O fD. t/)O

cr. cW -5 l O-p* ft) o w o

ON l AKfORESEARCHf ()l JNf )AI ION

SHl HIOAN F'AHK FUSE ARCH COMMUNITY

MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CANADA L5K 1B3 .(4161822-4111 . TELEX 06-982311

April 9, 1984

TO: Mr. Craig BoothNon-Metallic Minerals

REPORT NUMBER FPL 50005-84-10

IDENTIFICATION W -0- #15779

SPECIFICATIONS Particle Size Analysis of Six Dolomite SamplesOF ORDER

1. INTRODUCTION

Six dolomite samples were submitted for particle size

measurement using the Coulter Counter technique. The samples were identified as:

(1) Trisar #3 (ballmilled)(2) Jetmilled(3) Baghouse(4) Overflow(5) 0/F #3(6) U/F #3

2. METHOD

A representative portion of each submitted sample was extracted and analyzed on the Coulter Counter TAIL The samples

were diluted with Isoton II and subject to 30 seconds in a low

WE, THE ONTARIO RESEARCH FOUND AT ION, STIPULATE THAI T HIS DOCUMENT IS SU EJECT TOTHE FOLLOWING T E R MS AND CONDITIONS:

1. ANY PROPOSAL CONTAINED HEREIN WAS PREPARED FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF THE ADDRESSEE ONLY. ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED BY NOR DISCLOSED TO

ANY OTHER PARTY WITHOUT OUR PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

2. ANY TESTING, INSPECTION OR INVESTIGATION PERFORMED BY US WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NORMAL PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS. NEITHER WE

NOROUREMPLOYEESSHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY LOSS OFI DAMAGE RESULTING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FROM ANY DEFAULT. ERROR OR OMISSION.

3 ANY REPORT, PROPOSAL OR QUOTATION PREPARED BY US REFERS ONLY TO THE PARTICULAR MATERIAL, INSTRUMENT OR OTHER SUBJECT REFERRED TO IN IT. NO

REPRESENTATION IS MADE THAT SIMILAR ARTICLES WILL BE OF LIKE QUALITY.

4. NO REPORT ISSUE D BY USSHALL BE PUBLISHED IN WHOLE OR IN PART WITHOUT OUR PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

5 OUR NAME SHALL NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SALE, OFFER OR ADVERTISEMENT OF ANY ARTICLE, PROCESS OR SERVICE.

6 WE RESERVE THE RIGHT NOT TO COMMENCE AND/OR CONTINUE ANY WORK UNTIL PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS SATISFACTORY TO US ARE ESTABLISHED.

Craig BoothReport No. FPL 50005-84-10

power ultrasonic bath to aid in participate dispersion. For all samples, a multi-aperture tube technique was required to evaluate the complete particle size distribution.

3. RESULTS

Appendix I gives both the numerical data (by volume) as well as the distribution statistics and graphical representations for each sample. A summary of the d ,r., d , and dgQ diameters are presented in Table I.

TABLE I

{Percent Volume Less Than)

Sample (ym) (ym)

1.2.3.

4.5.6.

Trisar #3JetmilledBaghouse

Overflow0/F #3U/F #3

1.32.11.11.01.65.3

3.7

7.4

2.0

2.1

5.0

14.0

9.618.53.58.715.630.7

Due to the extremely fine nature of Samples 3 and 4, an absolute value for the percent less than the minimum measurable value (0.6 - 0.8 ym), could only be estimated using the technique of Emonet. For Sample 3, (Baghouse) it is estimated that 7.r/o by volume is less than 0.8 ym and for Sample 4, (Overflow) 4.5/b is less than 0.6 ym. This would further reduce the values calculated in Table I.

Mike P. Haley S Assistant Research Scientist

I.H. Joyce, Manager Non-Metallic Minerals Centre

/gb

Craig BoothReport No. FPL 50005-84-10

APPENDIX I

NUMERICAL, STATISTICAL AND GRAPHICAL RESULTS

DATE: NOV 30 83 SAMPLE: DOLOMITE (TRISAR) #3 ELECTROLYTE: ISOTON DISPERSANT: i c EQUIPMENT: T A i i APERTURES: so 7 o OPERATOR: SMITH

CH.tt SIZE DIFF VOL 7.

VOLUME 7. STATISTICS

CUM VOL

12/^

4567B91011121314151617181920

.4

.5

.63

.7911.261.5922.523. 1845.046.35810.0812.716.0120. 1725.4132. 0 1

0003.656.5810.610.210.310.510.49.57. 14.22.41.4.40O

1OO10010010096.491.484.976.966.356. 145.835.324.915.48.34. 11.7.300

MEAN: MEDIAN:MODE:STANDARD DEVIATION:SKEWNESS: KURTOSIS:

3.64 UM3.65 UM2.45 UM 2.O9 UM1.02 POSITIVE i. 96 PLATYKURTIC

Trisar ResourcesReport No. IMS 63-40012-84

APPENDIX A

PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS OF THE SIX DOLOMITE SAMPLES

DATE: JAN 16 84SAMPLE: DOLOMITE AFTER JETMILL ELECTROLYTE: IBOTON DISPERSANT: NIL EQUIPMENT: TA 11 APERTURTES: 3O 14O OPERATOR: SMITH COMMENTS: -

CH.tt

12.\

456789101112131415161718192021 T~j^.ji

23

SIZE

.4

.5

.63

.7911.261.5922.523.1845.O46. 35B10.0812.716.0120. 1725.4132.0140.3350.8264 . O2

DIFFVOL X

00.411.O71.852.673.544.75.967.038.468. 129. 179.881O. 6110.329.984.51. 17.2.3700

CUMVOL y.

10010010099.5998.5296.679490.4685.7679.872.7764.3156. 1947.0237. 1426.5316.216.241.74.56.3700

VOLUME y. STATISTICS

MEAN: MEDIAN:MODESTANDARD DEVIATION:COEF. VAR. :SKEWNESS: KURTOSIS:

6. 7 1 UM 7.42 UM11.89 UM 2.31 UM 34.36X.79 NEGATIVE 3.33 LEPTOKURTIC

DATE: JAN 23 83SAMPLE: DOLOMITE BAGHOUSE ELECTROLYTE: ISOTON DISPERSANT: ic EQUIPMENT: TA 11 APERTURTES: 30 70 OPERATOR: SMITHCOMMENTS: -

CH.tt

it -frr -fc -fc -fc-i

12345678910H121314151617181920

SIZE

.4

.5

.63

.7911.261.5922.523. 1845 . O46.35S10. OB12.716.0120. 1725.4132.01

DIFFVOL 7.

0O05.459.8615.7320. 1220.4515. 128.753.88.23. 1.05.2.0700O

CUMVOL 7.

f-#####**"10010010010094.5584.6968.9648.8428.3913.284.521.52.64.41.31.26.07000

VOLUME 7. STATISTICS

MEAN:MEDIAN:MODESTANDARD DEVIATION:COEF. VAR.:SKEWNESS:KURTOSIS:

1.98 UM1.97 UM2.03 UM1.54 UM77.697.1.03 NEGATIVE1.14 PLATYKURTIC

DATE: MAR l A B4SAMPLE: DOLOMITE OVERFLOW ELECTROLYTE: ISOTON DISPERSAL!-: IA EQUIPMENT: TA 11 APERTURTES: 30 70 280 OPERATOR: SMITH COMMENTS: ~

C H. tt

***** H

2'J'1

4567891011121 314351617181920212223242526

SIZE

.4f- 1

. vJ

,, 63.7911 . 261.59rf::.2.523 . 1 845.046 . 3583 0 . 083. 2 . 736.0320. 1725.4132.014 C*. 3 350.8264 . 0280.67101 .63128.05

D IF FVOL, 7.

003.236.7510. 1313.481 4 . 3413.889.46.484.323.663.482. 972.622.091 . 45.91. 4 7.25. 32. 12. 06000

CUMVOL 7.

1 OO1 001 0096.7790.0279.8866.452.0638. 1828.7922.3118. 191 4 . 521 1 . 058 . 085.463. 361.911.01.54. 3. 18. 06000

VOLUME 7. STATISTICS

MEAN: 2.46 UMMEDIAN: 2.07 UMMODE 1.84 UM STANDARD DEVIATION: 2.28 UMCOEF. VAR.: 92.897.SKEWNESS: 1.75 POSITIVEKURTOSIS: 5.58 LEPTOKURTIC

DATE: APR 3 84 SAMPLE: DOLOMITE NO-3 O/F ELECTROLYTE: JSOTON DISPERSANT: NIL EQUIPMENT: TA 11 APERTURTES: 30 70 280 OPERATOR: SMITH COMMENTS: NIL

CH.#

1'-p

34567891011121314151617181920212223242526

SIZE

.4

.5

.63

.7911.261.5922.523. 1845.046.35B1O. 0812.716.012O. 1725.4132. 0 140. 3350.8264 . 0280.67101.63128.05

DIFFVOL 7.

001.232. 172.893.914.565.867.5510.4312.0713.391O. 767.234.443.923.342.441.741 . O3.64. 16.23000

CUMVOL 7.

^*####*# 1001001OO98.7796.693.789.885.2379.3771.8261.3949.3135.9325. 1717.9413.519.586.243.82.06l . 03.39.23000

VOLUME 7. STATISTICS

MEAN:MEDIAN:MODESTANDARD DEVIATION:COEF. VAR. :SKEWNESS: KURTOSIS:

4.95 UM4.98 UM 5.44 UM 2.36 UM 47.647.i. i NEGATIVE 5.13 LEPTOKURTIC

DATE: APR 3 84 SAMPLE: DOLOMITE NO-3 LI x F ELECTROLYTE: ISOTON DISPERSANT: NIL EQUIPMENT: TA 11 APERTLIRTES: 70 280 OPERATOR: SMITH COMMENTS: NIL

CH.4*

1*-i*L

345678910111213141516171819202122

SIZE

*-fc-fc-fc-fc#*#*-#^H

l1.261.5922.523. 1745.046.35810.0812.71620. 1625.43240.3250.86480.63101.59128

DIFFVOL y.

o0.29.761.432.523.725.717.751O.0811.8813.9113.211.568.785.042.271.0200.090

CUMVOL "/.

10010010099.7198.9597.529591.2885.5777.8267. 7 A55.8641.9528.7517.28.413.371.11.09.09.09O

VOLUME y. STATISTICS

MEAN: MEDIAN:MODESTANDARD DEVIATION:COEF. VAR. :SKEWNESS:KURTOSIS:

13.32 UM 14 UM15.07 UM1.96 UM14.73'/..91 NEGATIVE1.79 PLATYKURTIC

.....l,....DOLOMITE TRISAR #3 (BALLMILLED)

.f.c-Y 7 r T ri fil M

'i i: ' hoi. o h :i 'i F RF T e R Jt.i.M i FI.

SIZE l H UM

^ SriMPLE:DOLOMITE BrtGHOUSE

si?r in 11 M

MM', :: ,fi)-n l, l IM..H ul-n l l U',4 \ '\ l 01-.!rsi,;:;:;:;::';.;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;

e. c

'i SAMPLE- 'DOLOMITE. HO-3

64 l

SIZE IN UM

5i SAMPLE ̂ DOLOMITE HO-3 U--F

0.1 . 11H .1 /. r

S J 71- HI MI-1

Trisar ResourcesReport No. IMS 63-40012-84

APPENDIX B

PRINCIPLE OF OPERATION OF FLUID ENERGY HILL

Trlsar ResourcesReport No. IMS 63-40012-84

PRINCIPLE OF OPERATION OF FLUID ENERGY HILL

Basically, the fluid energy mill makes use of the principle that if two particles collide, or are brought together with a sufficiently large force, one, or both of them, will break Into smaller pieces. In a fluid energy mill, the material to be pulverized is exposed to streams of fluid 1n the mill. The fluid (1n the present case, 54 psi of air) is introduced through specially designed nozzles which increases Us velocity. The solid particles are swept into violent turbulence by these velocity streams, colliding with, and quickly pulverizing one another.

The fluid stream flows upwards from the reduction zone and enters the classification zone. As the stream enters this zone, Us velocity is adjusted to combine with centrifugal action 1n guiding the oversize particles away from the mill outlet. Part of the circulating fluid, as it passes a reverse outlet, 1s deflected and swept from the mill, carrying only the solid particles that are small enough to be diverted from their path. Oversize particles, remaining in the mill, are carried back into the reduction zone, joining a new supply of raw feed.

Undersize particles, removed from the mill are recovered from a high efficiency (long cone) cyclone dust collector. Any ultrafine sized particles escaping from the cyclone collector are recovered from a baghouse dust collector.

31F8I6SE9554 2 .7114 GRIFFITH 900

Mining Lands Section

Control Sheet

File No r^ 7//V

TYPE OF SURVEY GEOPHYSICAL

GEOLOGICAL

GEOCHEMICAL

EXPENDITURE

MINING LANDS COMMENTS:

———-— fi / s

--ftff—tfi'tsaJi*^-jLj* 's

Signature of Assessor

Date

Natural

Ontario

Report of W/rk(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

FILE flInstructions:

Mining Act

Please type or print.- If number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list.Note: Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

- Do not use shaded areas below.Type oi Survey(s)

77C/OClaim HolderU)

Township or Area

GA iff* IT H T*/fi*j fProspector's Licence No.

/W7ST7

Address

Survey Companyj "

rf TOate of Survey (from Si to)

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)FOuNOftTtorii SttZtlPflN

Day [jvlo. Day l Mo^ L Y'...

Total Milei of line Cut

.

fl6*ifwn COMMUNITY 'Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here

^lv'

Airborne Credits

Note: Special ProvisioMt^\\ credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

^W0177\^

\Qjoefiemical

-itfSfi^Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

\ftays per Claim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits y

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's Choice. Enter number of^deYTcTroclits pcr^cTStrs^elected in columns i

ter number of^rfeyTt i at righv*^"^

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim

Prefix

Zo

Mia InA f,

Number

j&sm

NtNS-fiECOROS-OfflG

— li

Expend. Days Cr

Jt to

20

Z*

2*A*.

(oO

-*TORONJ\18'!""

X X

G

Mining ClaimPrefix Number

Expend. Days Cr.

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

Q L

Recorded Holder or Awrnt (Signature)

Certification Verifyifjtf^eport of Work

l hereby certify tfiat l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed heretfC having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

Ontario

Ministry ofNaturalRet^-ces

GeotechnicalReportApproval

File

Mining Lands Comments

D To: Geophysics

Comments

l l Approved j ) Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

To: Geology - t( M S" T /t rfComments

pproved | ] Wish to see again with correctionsSign

To: Geochemistry

Comments

l l Approved | [ Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

To: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. {Tel: 5-1380)

? 593/s J/w

LOCATION

MAP

RENFREW CTY

o

shVJvi Ui

September 20, 1984 File: 2.7114

Gary H.K. Pearse R.R.#3Navan, Ontario KOA 2SO

Dear Sir:

RE: Assay and Beneficiation Study submitted under Section 77(19) of the Mining Act R.S.O. 1980 on Mining Claims EO 593702 et al In the Township of Griffith

In order to complete your submlttlon for expenditure credits the following Items are required:

1) a map showing the location of the claims v

2) a map showing the sample locations

Please forward the above Information, 1n duplicate, to this office quoting file 2.7114.

For further Information, please contact Doug Isherwood it (416)96b~4888.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone:(416)965-4888

D. Isherwoochnic

sV n

.t"'

t

cc: Mining Recorder- Toronto, Ontario

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontario

GeotechnicalReportApproval

File

Mining Lands Comments

To: Geophysics

Comments

Approved Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

To: Geology -Jixpendituj'es r k hi ( ~T /? /}

CommentsS f ,^-x

W^ Awut: Q}fc*L0{

[ j Approved I^Wish to see again with corrections

D

Date Signature

To: Geochemistry-r

Comments

[~| Approved Q] Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

l lj p o: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380)

JSP3 ABVJO.)

1984 09 06 Your File: B4-44 Our File: 2.7114

Mrs. R.H. Charnesky Mining Recorder Ministry of Natural Resources Whitney Block, Rm 2548 99 Wellesley Street West Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

Dear Madam:

We have received data for Assaying and Benefication Studies submitted under Section 77(19) of the Mining Act R.S.O. 1980 for Mining Claims EO 59370? et'al 1n the Township of Griffith.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorUnd Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OnteHoM7A 1K3phone: (416)965-6916

A Barr:se

cc: Gary H.K. Pearse R.R. 13Navan, Ontario KOA 2SO

TDNTARIORESEHRch

INVOICE

Nol4883FOUNDATION

SHERIDAN PARK RESEARCH COMMUNITY,.WISSISSAUOA, ONTARIO, CANADA L6K 163 t (416) 622-4111 . TELEX 06-C82311

fISSUED TO i r i -ir t rv;.i:j,;t ..f s

l;-,von. Or; t.;; r! c K"*.-:, ;'lv.

At t? n 110!,: 't: . f-:. Pearce

TERMS: Net30dtyt; 1 J4IK chtryed on overdue accounts

YOUR ORDER NUMBERi

OUR REPORT NUMBER

ONTAWORrSMRCWFOUNDAriON

63-40012

:rviw-, OH-'' ; v l ,.v- ioh of l^c- i'Vio'iw Sar.':;:lfS fror-l i'ii-.-t'i; ,'ili j t "i .'

ACCOUNT:-: r:.:r:::iVA

AUG

07063510 WMRARCH FOUNDATION

RECEIVED2 'J

MINING LWOS SECTION

PLEASE PAY FROM THIS INVOICE - NO STATEMENT SENT

ACCOUNTING COPY

LY

ND

OC

HD

EN

BIG

H

BR

OU

GH

AM

GR

AT

TA

N