Upload
barnaby-nelson
View
213
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Preliminary Steps toward Developing a Sound Research Design for Analyzing the Spatial Distribution of Commercial Hazardous Waste Facilities in Wayne
County, Michigan: Part I
March 11, 1998
NRE 501
Robin Saha
General Research Question
Are low income and minority populations disproportionately
exposed to the risks associated with commercial hazardous waste facilities
in Wayne County, Michigan?
Research Design Issues
• Defining geographic areas of impact (“impact zones” or “ host neighborhoods”)
• Selecting a geographic unit of analysis (census tracts versus block groups)
Location of Wayne County, Michigan
STUDY AREA AND TSDF LOCATIONSWayne County, Michigan
#Y
#Y
#Y#Y #Y
#Y#Y#Y
#Y
#Y#Y
#YI- 94
I- 275
I- 75
US 39
Detroit
TSDFLocation
H u ro n
M o f fe tt
C a n to n
S u m p t e r
R o m u l u s
T a y lo r
H o ll is
V a n B u r e n
D e a rb o r n
W e s t la n dP ly m o u th
G r o s s e Il e
N o rt h v il le
C h a n d le r s
R e d fo r d
T re n t o n
In k s t e r
G r o s s e P o in te
W a y n e
A l l e n P a r k
F la t R o c k
M e r id ia n
S o u th g a t e
L a n g o r
B e ll e v i ll e
R i v e r v ie w
R i v e r R o u g e
R o c k w o o d
H ig h l a n d P a rkH a rp e r W o o d s
#Y
Considerations in Defining Impact Zones (Design Issue #1)• Proximity of known or potential impacts
• Inverse relationship between distance and impact (social, psychological, economic, environmental, and health )
• Size and shape of geographic units for which demographic data are available
• Previous research and comparability with other studies
DESIGN ISSUE #2Considerations in Selecting an Appropriate Unit of Analysis
• How different units affect the delineation of host neighborhoods in terms of how well they approximate circular areas
• Want to create host neighborhoods (“impact zones”) that are as equivalent as possible in size and shape (equidistant from hazardous waste facilities) -- inter-case consistency
Census Tracts with TSDFs
#Y
#Y
#Y#Y #Y
#Y#Y#Y
#Y
#Y#Y
#Y
Huron
Moffett
Canton
Sumpter
Romulus Taylor
Van BurenDearborn
WestlandPlymouth
Grosse Ile
NorthvilleRedford
Inkster
Wayne
Grosse Pointe
Allen Park
Flat Rock
SouthgateBellevilleRiverview
River Rouge
Rockwood
Highland Park
Detroit
Census Tracts at Least Partially within 1/2 Mile Circle Centered at TSDFs
#Y
#Y
#Y#Y #Y
#Y#Y#Y
#Y
#Y#Y
#Y
Huron
Moffett
Canton
Sumpter
Romulus Taylor
Van BurenDearborn
WestlandPlymouth
Grosse Ile
NorthvilleRedford
Inkster
Wayne
Grosse Pointe
Allen Park
Flat Rock
SouthgateBellevilleRiverview
River Rouge
Rockwood
Highland Park
Detroit
Census Tracts at Least Partially within 1.0 Mile Circle Centered at TSDFs
#Y
#Y
#Y#Y #Y
#Y#Y#Y
#Y
#Y#Y
#Y
Huron
Moffett
Canton
Sumpter
Romulus Taylor
Van BurenDearborn
WestlandPlymouth
Grosse Ile
NorthvilleRedford
Inkster
Wayne
Grosse Pointe
Allen Park
Flat Rock
SouthgateBellevilleRiverview
River Rouge
Rockwood
Highland Park
Detroit
1990 Census Tracts Partially within 1.5 Mile Circle Centered at TSDFs
#Y
#Y
#Y#Y #Y
#Y#Y#Y
#Y
#Y#Y
#Y
Huron
Moffett
Canton
Sumpter
Romulus Taylor
Van BurenDearborn
WestlandPlymouth
Grosse Ile
NorthvilleRedford
Inkster
Wayne
Grosse Pointe
Allen Park
Flat Rock
SouthgateBellevilleRiverview
River Rouge
Rockwood
Highland Park
Detroit
1990 Census Tracts at least Half within 1.5 Mile Circle Centered at TSDFs
#Y
#Y
#Y#Y #Y
#Y#Y#Y
#Y
#Y#Y
#Y
Huron
Moffett
Canton
Sumpter
Romulus Taylor
Van BurenDearborn
WestlandPlymouth
Grosse Ile
NorthvilleRedford
Inkster
Wayne
Grosse Pointe
Allen Park
Flat Rock
SouthgateBellevilleRiverview
River Rouge
Rockwood
Highland Park
Detroit
Number of Census Tracts Partially within and at Least Half within 1.5 Mile Radius of TSDFs
187
110
020406080
100120140160180200
at least 1/2within
partiallywithin
Area in Decimal Degrees of Census Tracts Partially within and at Least Half within
1.5 Mile Radius of TSDFs
0.0400
0.0209
0.0000
0.0050
0.0100
0.0150
0.0200
0.0250
0.0300
0.0350
0.0400
0.0450
at least 1/2 within partially within
Area of Census Tracts Partially within and at Least Half within 1.5 Mile Radius of
TSDFs, as a Percentage of Wayne County
23%
12%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
at least 1/2 within partially within
Delineation of Host Neighborhood as Census Tracts Partially Encompassed by Circle of 1.0 Mile Radius
#
Delineation of Host Neighborhood as Census Tracts with Area at Least Half within Circle of 1.0 Mile Radius
#
Census Tracts Partially within 1.5 Mile Circle Centered at Env’l Waste Control
#Y
Census Tract at Least Half within 1.5 Mile Circle Centered at Env’l Waste Control
#Y
Block Groups Partially within 1.5 Mile Circle Centered at Env’l Waste Control
#Y
Block Groups At Least Half within 1.5 Mile Circle Centered at Env’l Waste Control
#Y
Census Tracts Partially within 1.5 Mile Circle Centered at ChemMet
#Y
Block Groups Partially within 1.5 Mile Circle Centered at ChemMet
#Y
Census Tracts At Least Half within 1.5 Mile Circle Centered at ChemMet
#Y
Block Groups At Least Half within 1.5 Mile Circle Centered at ChemMet
#Y
Census Tracts within 1.5 Miles of City Environmental Facility
X
Block Groups within 1.5 Miles of City Environmental Facility
X
“Underlap” and Overlap of Census Tracts within 1.5 Miles of City Environmental
X
“Underlap” and Overlap of Block Groups within 1.5 Miles of City Environmental
X
Area As a Percentage of 1.5 Mile Circle of Underlap and Overlap for City Environmental
Unit ofAnalysis
Underlap Overlap
Tracts 11.9% 8.7%
Block Groups 5.1% 9.3%
Comparison of Host Neighborhood Delineations Using Census Tracts and Block Groups
AREA IN SQUARE MILES
Block Groups Census Tracts
1.5 Mile HostNeighborhood
7.37 6.84
1.5 Mile RadiusCircle
7.07 7.07
% of 1.5 MileRadius Circle
104% 97%
Total Population in Host Neighborhoods Using Tracts vs. Combination of Tracts
and Block Groups
Facility Name
Surrounding Tracts Method (STM)
Fixed Area Method (FAM)
Difference (FAM - STM)
% Diff
Michigan Disposal 4,765 5,637 872 15%Wayne Disposal 4,765 5,637 872 15%
ChemMet 5,050 13,398 8,348 62%Edwards Oil 16,705 17,047 342 2%
Michigan Recovery 17,808 14,996 -2,812 -19%City Envl 29,785 33,428 3,643 11%St. Mary's 32,188 28,384 -3,804 -13%
Petro-Chem 32,854 31,552 -1,302 -4%Envl Waste Control 39,773 28,176 -11,597 -41%
Deerborn 41,884 47,059 5,175 11%Dynecol 42,826 42,008 -818 -2%
Cyanokem 48,878 62,631 13,753 22%Goldshields 63,158 66,064 2,906 4%
TOTAL 375,674 390,380 14,706 4%
AVERAGE 31,306 32,532 1,226 4%
Selected Demographics of Host Neighborhoods Using Tracts vs.
Combination of Tracts and Block GroupsTotal
PopulationPercent
NonwhiteMean Family
Income
Wayne County 2,111,687 43% $40,241
Surrounding Tract Method
375,674 49% $31,920
Fixed Area Method
390,380 43% $31,016
Difference 14,706 -5.9% -$904
% Difference/Ratio
3.8% 0.88 -2.6%
Conclusions Regarding Host Neighborhood Delineations
• Areas within a given radius delineate significantly different host neighborhoods using partially vs. mostly circumscribed geographic units (tracts or block groups)
• Host neighborhood shape and size can (but do not always) vary significantly depending on whether tracts or block groups are used and urban vs. non-urban locations
• Tract/block group differences appear to be insignificant for highly urbanized locations (based on City Env’l TSDF)
• Need to repeat analysis for other host neighborhoods, especially for suburban and rural locations
Conclusions Regarding Units of Analysis
• Preliminary findings suggest choice of using census tracts or block groups can significantly influence demographic results
• These differences need be more carefully assessed before research design decisions regarding most appropriate unit of analysis can be made
• Methods for estimating demographic data in “underlap” and overlap areas may address both research design issues
THE ENDTHE END
STUDY AREA AND TSDF LOCATIONSWayne County, Michigan
#Y
#Y
#Y#Y #Y
#Y#Y#Y
#Y
#Y#Y
#Y I- 94
I- 27 5
I- 75
US 39
Detroit
TSDFLocation
H u ro n
M o f fe t t
C a n to n
Su m p te r
R o m u lu s
Ta y lo r
H o l lis
Va n B u re n
D e a rb o rn
W e s t la n dP ly m o ut h
G ro s s e I le
N o rth v il le
C h a n d le rs
R e d fo r d
Tr e n to n
In k s t e r
G ro s s e P o in t e
W a y n e
A l le n P a rk
Fla t R o c k
M e rid ia n
So u th g a te
La n g o r
B e l le v il le
R iv e rv ie w
R iv e r R o u g e
R o c k w oo d
H ig hla n d Pa rkH a rp e r W o o d s
#Y
Area in Square Miles of Underlap and Overlap for City Environmental
Unit ofAnalysis
Underlap Overlap
Tracts 0.8444 0.6143
Block Groups 0.3630 0.6604
Census Tracts at Least Partially within 2.0 Mile Circle Centered at TSDFs
#Y
#Y
#Y#Y #Y
#Y#Y#Y
#Y
#Y#Y
#Y
Huron
Moffett
Canton
Sumpter
Romulus Taylor
Van BurenDearborn
WestlandPlymouth
Grosse Ile
NorthvilleRedford
Inkster
Wayne
Grosse Pointe
Allen Park
Flat Rock
SouthgateBellevilleRiverview
River Rouge
Rockwood
Highland Park
Detroit