Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Preliminary Report for Big Cypress Bayou Paddlefish
Reintroduction Assessment February 2014 to August 2014
Texas Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office
Peter Diaz and Mike Montagne
Executive Summary
On19 February 2014, biologists from Texas Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office
(TXFWCO) and Tishomingo National Fish Hatchery (TNFH) implanted radio tags into 47
eighteen month old paddlefish from the TNFH. The radio tags have a maximum life expectancy
of 494 days. Surgeries were performed under the supervision of Kerry Graves, the project leader
at TNFH, who has conducted numerous paddlefish surgeries. The surgeries were all successful
with zero mortalities resulting from the procedure. The fish were kept at TNFH for two weeks
prior to transport to the Big Cypress Bayou area on 5 March 2014.
Figure 1. Paddlefish prepared for surgery at Tishomingo National Fish Hatchery.
Paddlefish are notorious for their poor ability to handle transport in most fish hauling
tanks. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) designed two new circular tanks to
transport the fishes to the Big Cypress Bayou safely (Figure 2). These tanks worked extremely
well and all fish arrived at the release sites energetic and healthy.
Figure 2. Transport tanks from Texas Parks and Wildlife Department.
On 3 March 2014, TXFWCO biologists traveled to the Big Cypress Bayou area to set up
radio telemetry towers at three locations. Towers were erected on private property above
Jefferson, on private property just below Caddo Lake State Park, and on U.S. Corp of Engineers
land above the Caddo Lake spillway on the Louisiana side (Figure 3). The paddlefish were
released at two locations within the Big Cypress Bayou. Thirty six radio tagged paddlefish were
released at Caddo Lake State Park, and eleven additional radio tagged paddlefish were released
18 miles upstream at the boat ramp in Jefferson Texas. Following the release, the fish were
tracked by boat. All 47 fish were contacted by the telemetry towers following release.
Figure 3. Map of the study area showing locations of the towers.
By 21 April 2014, 44% (21) of the paddlefish had moved up to the Lake O’ the Pines
(LOP) spillway. Another 27% (13 fishes) were present within the Big Cypress Bayou, and one
fish located within Caddo Lake. A total of 35 fish were contacted in April 2014 after the release
in March. The trend for the fishes to move upstream to the LOP spillway has continued up to the
last monitoring date for this report (August 2014; Figure 4). The Big Cypress Bayou from
Caddo Lake to the LOP spillway is about 34 miles. Therefore, these fish traveled at most
approximately 32 miles from the Caddo Lake State Park up to the LOP spillway. The fish
released at Jefferson that moved upstream to the LOP spillway travelled around 11 miles.
During the August monitoring trip, TXFWCO and TPWD electrofished the area below the LOP
spillway searching for paddlefish. Five paddlefish were seen, three of them were captured. All
three fish looked healthy and had gained weight and grown longer (Figure 5). The data collected
to date indicates that no paddlefish have gone over the Caddo Lake spillway in Louisiana.
Figure 4. Paddlefish present within half a mile from the Lake O’ the Pines spillway from March
to August 2014 (left y-axis; blue line). The red line are the flows released from Lake
O’ the Pines (right y-axis).
Figure 5. Paddlefish captured in August 2014 during electroshocking below Lake O’ the Pines
spillway.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0
5
10
15
20
25
March April May June July August
Monthly Data
Eight of the 11 fish released at Jefferson were detected at Tower 1 (most upstream
telemetry tower) from the 5-10 March 2014. This tower is 2.5 miles upstream of the Jefferson
release site. In addition, 20 paddlefish that were stocked at the Caddo Lake State Park were
contacted at Tower 1 in March 2014; with an additional five contacted in April 2014. All
contacts of paddlefish by telemetry towers or boat tracking are presented in Table 1. Boat miles
tracked is lower in March and April 2014 due to the stocking in March and the need to adjust
equipment and other technical issues in April.
Table 1. Data collected from towers and tracking on locations of paddlefish within the study
area.
March April May June July August Last Known
Location
LOP Spillway 0 21 20 19 17 17 26
Big Cypress Bayou 47 13 14 7 7 1 13
Caddo 0 1 0 0 2 0 6
Boat Miles 10 30 50 50 50
Fish Contacted 47 35 34 26 26 18 45
Percentage LOP 44 42 40 36 36 55
Percentage BCB 27 29 14 14 2 27
Percentage Caddo 2 0 0 4 0 12
Temperature Data
Temperature loggers were deployed at four sites within Big Cypress Bayou. The data
will be analyzed and compared to data in the literature for paddlefish migration ques. The
temperature data from Tower 1 and 2 is highly correlated with flow from LOP (Figure 3). This
relationship is to be expected, however, the temperature is likely to be correlated with seasonality
as well. One temperature logger below LOP spillway was not recovered, and a new logger will
be placed in the area on the September 2014. Another logger is within a section of the Big
Cypress Bayou that is inaccessible at the current flow. The temperature logger has enough
memory to log data every 15 minutes for the next year. Once flows increase the data will be
downloaded. Below is the data for temperature loggers from Tower 1 and 2.
Figure 3. Temperature recorded from data loggers present at Towers 1 and 2. Temperature is
reported in Celsius.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
5-M
ar
12
-Mar
19
-Mar
26
-Mar
2-A
pr
9-A
pr
16
-Ap
r
23
-Ap
r
30
-Ap
r
7-M
ay
14
-May
21
-May
28
-May
4-J
un
11
-Ju
n
18
-Ju
n
25
-Ju
n
2-J
ul
9-J
ul
16
-Ju
l
23
-Ju
l
Tower 1 Temperature Data
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
4-M
ar
11
-Mar
18
-Mar
25
-Mar
1-A
pr
8-A
pr
15
-Ap
r
22
-Ap
r
29
-Ap
r
6-M
ay
13
-May
20
-May
27
-May
3-J
un
10
-Ju
n
17
-Ju
n
24
-Ju
n
1-J
ul
8-J
ul
15
-Ju
l
22
-Ju
l
Tower 2 Temperature Data
Pearsons Correlation to flow data
r = -0.52; p = <0.0001
Pearsons Correlation to flow data
r = -0.53; p = <0.0001
Flow Data from Lake O’ the Pines Spillway
Table 2. Data from the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers for the Lake O’ the Pines Spillway from
the beginning of the study to early September 2014.
Day March April May June July August September
1 313 232 299 55 54 53
2 253 185 299 55 54 53
3 347 185 225 55 54 53
4 347 185 162 54 54 53
5 403 347 167 162 54 54 53
6 403 348 158 162 54 54 53
7 403 349 158 162 54 54 53
8 403 519 158 162 54 54 53
9 403 984 158 162 54 54
10 403 1116 158 162 54 54
11 402 1615 159 162 54 54
12 401 1912 159 162 54 54
13 401 1907 250 162 54 54
14 401 1373 296 162 54 54
15 401 767 297 162 54 54
16 403 437 297 121 54 54
17 403 347 298 96 54 54
18 402 347 299 96 54 54
19 403 347 299 96 54 54
20 403 347 299 96 54 54
21 403 347 299 96 54 54
22 403 347 299 96 54 54
23 403 347 299 96 54 54
24 403 346 299 96 54 54
25 403 346 299 95 54 54
26 402 345 299 96 54 54
27 401 345 299 96 54 54
28 401 345 299 95 54 54
29 402 345 299 96 54 54
30 401 345 299 68 54 54
31 401 299 54 54