1
Gospel: Mahew 18: 2135 We connue Mahews Sermon on the Church’. The passage starts with Peters queson to Jesus on forgiveness. Lord, how oſten must I forgive my brother…? When Peter asked his queson he would have thought that to forgive someone as many as seven mes was generous; seven was seen as a symbol of completeness. Indeed the Rabbis of the me taught that to forgive three mes was sufficient. The biblical proof for this was taken from the opening chapters of the book of the Prophet Amos in the Old Testament. Seventy seven mes seven.Jesus replies to Peter, also using the symbolism of numbers, indicang that forgiveness must be without limit. He mulplies Peters seven, a symbol of completeness, by ten, a number seen as a symbol of infinity. The real meaning of forgiveness. Jesus teaches the people that their atude towards forgiveness is at fault, with a parable that forms one of the sternest and most challenging passages in the Gospels. The parable of the unforgiving debtor has been referred to as a dramasaon of the fiſth Beatude: Happy the merciful: they shall have mercy shown them (Mahew 5: 7). The debt that could never be repaid. One of the most important points in the story is the significant contrast between the two debts. The first servant owed his master 10,000 talents, a talent being the equivalent of 15 yearswages. This huge debt was more than the total budget of an ordinary province. (The total revenue of the province which contained Idumaea, Judaea and Samaria was only 600 talents; the total revenue of a wealthy province like Galilee was only 300 talents.) This first servant was himself owed 100 denarii, a denarius being a days wage; a fracon of the debt which had caused him to beg for mercy. Were you not bound, then, to have pity on your fellow servant just as I had pity on you?The King was an Oriental despot. To take a mans family in lieu of his debt was common pracce, especially among the pagans. Tyrants, parcularly in the Orient, made use of torture to extract confessions or to force the vicms family into paying the debt. Regardless of this, we see that the King, in his pity for the servant, cancels the enre debt and expects the forgiven one to do the same. PREGO PLUS: BACKGROUND NOTES Twenty-fourth Sunday in Ordinary Time Psalm 102 (103) This psalm is a song of thanksgiving for Gods love and forgiveness for us all. It helps to negate the old division somemes made between the Old and the New Testaments: the first supposedly being centred on fear; the second on love. As is usual in this type of psalm, the author starts with an introducon of thanks to the Lord and then gives reasons for his gratude. For this he uses a series of verbs in close succession: forgives, heals, redeems, crowns. When the psalmist addresses his soul’, he means his inner being’, what keeps him alive. At first the psalmist speaks in his own name (my soul), then addresses the rest of the people present who pray with him (he crowns you with love and compassion). Through him, the whole people of Israel give thanks. Gods greatest expression of his love for us all is his mercy and forgiveness despite our faults (he forgives all our guilt). The psalmist goes beyond thanksgiving for the blessings he has personally received and also includes the whole of creaon as far as the east is from the west’. God loves all who fear him’. The Hebrew word translated here by feardoes not have the modern implicaon of anxiety, apprehension, alarm at possible punishment. Rather it denotes awe, reverent respect, honour and obedience to the Lords will. The phrase, oſten repeated throughout the Psalter and which today forms the response to the psalm, The Lord is compassion and love, slow to anger and rich in mercyechoes the words of the Lord on Mount Sinai in the presence of Moses (Exodus 34: 6). It describes the psalmists understanding of the nature of God.

PREGO PLUS: AKGROUND NOTES Gospel: Matthew 18: 21 35 ... · Indeed the Rabbis of the time taught that to forgive three times was sufficient. The biblical proof for this was taken

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: PREGO PLUS: AKGROUND NOTES Gospel: Matthew 18: 21 35 ... · Indeed the Rabbis of the time taught that to forgive three times was sufficient. The biblical proof for this was taken

Gospel: Matthew 18: 21–35

We continue Matthew’s ‘Sermon on the Church’. The passage starts with Peter’s question to Jesus on forgiveness. Lord, how often must I forgive my brother…? When Peter asked his question he would have thought that to forgive someone as many as seven times was generous; seven was seen as a symbol of completeness. Indeed the Rabbis of the time taught that to forgive three times was sufficient. The biblical proof for this was taken from the opening chapters of the book of the Prophet Amos in the Old Testament. ‘Seventy seven times seven.’ Jesus replies to Peter, also using the symbolism of numbers, indicating that forgiveness must be without limit. He multiplies Peter’s seven, a symbol of completeness, by ten, a number seen as a symbol of infinity. The real meaning of forgiveness. Jesus teaches the people that their attitude towards forgiveness is at fault, with a parable that forms one of the sternest and most challenging passages in the Gospels. The parable of the unforgiving debtor has been referred to as a dramatisation of the fifth Beatitude: Happy the merciful: they shall have mercy shown them (Matthew 5: 7). The debt that could never be repaid. One of the most important points in the story is the significant contrast between the two debts. The first servant owed his master 10,000 talents, a talent being the equivalent of 15 years’ wages. This huge debt was more than the total budget of an ordinary province. (The total revenue of the province which contained Idumaea, Judaea and Samaria was only 600 talents; the total revenue of a wealthy province like Galilee was only 300 talents.) This first servant was himself owed 100 denarii, a denarius being a day’s wage; a fraction of the debt which had caused him to beg for mercy. ‘Were you not bound, then, to have pity on your fellow servant just as I had pity on you?’ The King was an Oriental despot. To take a man’s family in lieu of his debt was common practice, especially among the pagans. Tyrants, particularly in the Orient, made use of torture to extract confessions or to force the victim’s family into paying the debt. Regardless of this, we see that the King, in his pity for the servant, cancels the entire debt and expects the forgiven one to do the same.

PREGO PLUS: BACKGROUND NOTES

Twenty-fourth Sunday in Ordinary Time

Psalm 102 (103)

This psalm is a song of thanksgiving for God’s love and forgiveness for us all. It helps to negate the old division sometimes made between the Old and the New Testaments: the first supposedly being centred on fear; the second on love.

As is usual in this type of psalm, the author starts with an introduction of thanks to the Lord and then gives reasons for his gratitude. For this he uses a series of verbs in close succession: forgives, heals, redeems, crowns.

When the psalmist addresses his ‘soul’, he means his ‘inner being’, what keeps him alive.

At first the psalmist speaks in his own name (my soul), then addresses the rest of the people present who pray with him (he crowns you with love and compassion). Through him, the whole people of Israel give thanks.

God’s greatest expression of his love for us all is his mercy and forgiveness despite our faults (he forgives all our guilt).

The psalmist goes beyond thanksgiving for the blessings he has personally received and also includes the whole of creation ‘as far as the east is from the west’.

God loves all who ‘fear him’. The Hebrew word translated here by ‘fear’ does not have the modern implication of anxiety, apprehension, alarm at possible punishment. Rather it denotes awe, reverent respect, honour and obedience to the Lord’s will.

The phrase, often repeated throughout the Psalter and which today forms the response to the psalm, ‘The Lord is compassion and love, slow to anger and rich in mercy’ echoes the words of the Lord on Mount Sinai in the presence of Moses (Exodus 34: 6). It describes the psalmist’s understanding of the nature of God.