1
Editorial Preface to the special issuedEarly-Middle Pleistocene Palaeoenvironment in the Levant In May 2009, The Institute for Advanced Studies, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, with nancial support from the Israel Science Foundation, hosted a three-day workshop entitled The effect of climate change on the environment and hominins of the Upper Jordan Valley between ca. 800 ka and 700 ka ago as a basis for prediction of future scenarios.The participants included earth scientists, archaeologists, and paleontologists from Israel, Europe, and the United States, and their presentations focused mainly on the Acheulean site of Gesher Benot Yaaqov (GBY). GBY is located just south of the Hula Valley in the northern Dead Sea Rift. Until the 1950s, the valley housed a freshwater lake and marsh areas fed by the Jordan River, and the sediments at GBY reect a more expansive lake, aptly called paleo-Lake Hula. The excavations exposed a depositional sequence that reached a cumulative thick- ness of 34 m and that records a shift from reversed to normal geomagnetic polarity. The paleomagnetic readings place the sedi- ments rmly between 800 ka and 700 ka. Archaeological investiga- tions at GBY began in the 1930s, but the site achieved its present prominence only after 1989, when Hebrew University archaeologist Naama Goren-Inbar initiated a multidisciplinary research program designed to take full advantage of the sites unique context and contents. Goren-Inbar and her colleagues not only established the geologic antiquity of the site, but their large, thoughtfully analyzed artifact samples revealed that GBY bore a striking resemblance to contemporaneous African sites. Like their African contemporaries, the GBY Acheuleans preferentially chose volcanic rock for biface manufacture, and the bifaces and associated tools they produced have a distinctly African avor. Perhaps most telling are large basalt akes that have a bulb of percussion on both surfaces. Similar pieces are otherwise common only in eastern and northern Africa, where they are often called Kombewa akes. At both GBY and the African sites, Kombewa akes were often used to produce the guillotine-like bifaces known as cleavers, and they place GBY rmly within the African Acheulean tradition. One possible explanation is that like some earlier and later Israeli sites, GBY marks a time when Africa expanded ecologically to incorpo- rate its southwest Asian periphery. A more intriguing alternative is that it records an Out-of-Africa movement that paralleled the Mediterranean coast and that could have produced, rst, the still sparsely known Acheulean of Anatolia and, later, the much better known Acheulean of Europe. The GBY animal remains support an Out-of-Africa event, for they include the oldest well-established Eurasian record of the straight-tusked woodland elephant, Elephas (Palaeoloxodon) antiquus, which evolved from E. (Palaeoloxodon) recki in Africa before 1 Ma. By 600 ka, E. antiquus or its descendants were distributed from Spain to China, and its bones consistently characterize the earliest well-documented European Acheulean sites, dated to between 600 ka and 300 ka. Gesher Benot Yaaqov would be important if we knew only its rmly dated stone artifacts and associated animal fossils, but in addition, prolonged water-logging means that the deposits also preserve bark, fruits, and seeds, some from edible plants, and fragments of wood, including a piece that the Acheulean inhabi- tants appear to have polished. The plant remains allow an unusu- ally detailed reconstruction of the lakeside environment and of the way in which Acheulean people may have exploited it. In further testimony to GBYs unique information potential, the meticulous excavations have also revealed discrete clusters of burned int chips surrounded by spreads of mainly unburned artifacts, bones, and vegetal remains. The clusters have been plau- sibly interpreted as the remnants of Acheulean replaces, and they comprise the oldest widely accepted evidence for human use of re. This Special Issue of the Journal of Human Evolution derives from the multidisciplinary presentations at the Workshop, many of which emphasized the unique contribution of GBY to our under- standing of Acheulean behavior and ecology. Thus, the following articles are intended to bring the benets of the Workshop to a wider audience, some by addressing aspects of GBY directly, others by placing it in a broader archaeological or paleoenviron- mental context. The Workshop organizers, Naama Goren-Inbar and Baruch Spiro, who also served as guest editors for this special issue, have asked me to express their gratitude to JHE editor, Steven Leigh, and to his editorial assistants, Natalie Uhl and Jodi Blumen- feld, for their help and support. I thank the organizers for the opportunity to attend the Workshop and to learn more there and in this special issue about the unusually productive multidisci- plinary exploration of a key Acheulean site in both regional and temporal contexts. Richard Klein Program in Human Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States E-mail address: [email protected] Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Human Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jhevol Journal of Human Evolution 60 (2011) 319 0047-2484/$ see front matter Ó 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.02.002

Preface to the special issue—Early-Middle Pleistocene Palaeoenvironment in the Levant

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Preface to the special issue—Early-Middle Pleistocene Palaeoenvironment in the Levant

lable at ScienceDirect

Journal of Human Evolution 60 (2011) 319

Contents lists avai

Journal of Human Evolution

journal homepage: www.elsevier .com/locate/ jhevol

Editorial

Preface to the special issuedEarly-Middle Pleistocene Palaeoenvironment in theLevant

In May 2009, The Institute for Advanced Studies, HebrewUniversity of Jerusalem, with financial support from the IsraelScience Foundation, hosted a three-day workshop entitled “Theeffect of climate change on the environment and hominins of theUpper Jordan Valley between ca. 800 ka and 700 ka ago as a basisfor prediction of future scenarios.” The participants included earthscientists, archaeologists, and paleontologists from Israel, Europe,and the United States, and their presentations focused mainly onthe Acheulean site of Gesher Benot Ya‘aqov (GBY). GBY is locatedjust south of the Hula Valley in the northern Dead Sea Rift. Untilthe 1950’s, the valley housed a freshwater lake and marsh areasfed by the Jordan River, and the sediments at GBY reflect a moreexpansive lake, aptly called paleo-Lake Hula. The excavationsexposed a depositional sequence that reached a cumulative thick-ness of 34 m and that records a shift from reversed to normalgeomagnetic polarity. The paleomagnetic readings place the sedi-ments firmly between 800 ka and 700 ka. Archaeological investiga-tions at GBY began in the 1930’s, but the site achieved its presentprominence only after 1989, whenHebrewUniversity archaeologistNaama Goren-Inbar initiated a multidisciplinary research programdesigned to take full advantage of the site’s unique context andcontents. Goren-Inbar and her colleagues not only established thegeologic antiquity of the site, but their large, thoughtfully analyzedartifact samples revealed that GBY bore a striking resemblance tocontemporaneous African sites. Like their African contemporaries,the GBY Acheuleans preferentially chose volcanic rock for bifacemanufacture, and the bifaces and associated tools they producedhave a distinctly African flavor. Perhaps most telling are large basaltflakes that have a bulb of percussion on both surfaces. Similarpieces are otherwise common only in eastern and northern Africa,where they are often called Kombewa flakes.

At both GBY and the African sites, Kombewa flakes were oftenused to produce the guillotine-like bifaces known as cleavers, andthey place GBY firmly within the African Acheulean tradition. Onepossible explanation is that like some earlier and later Israeli sites,GBY marks a time when Africa expanded ecologically to incorpo-rate its southwest Asian periphery. A more intriguing alternativeis that it records an Out-of-Africa movement that paralleled theMediterranean coast and that could have produced, first, the stillsparsely known Acheulean of Anatolia and, later, the much betterknown Acheulean of Europe. The GBY animal remains support anOut-of-Africa event, for they include the oldest well-established

0047-2484/$ – see front matter � 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd.doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.02.002

Eurasian record of the straight-tusked woodland elephant, Elephas(Palaeoloxodon) antiquus, which evolved from E. (Palaeoloxodon)recki in Africa before 1 Ma. By 600 ka, E. antiquus or its descendantswere distributed from Spain to China, and its bones consistentlycharacterize the earliest well-documented European Acheuleansites, dated to between 600 ka and 300 ka.

Gesher Benot Ya‘aqov would be important if we knew only itsfirmly dated stone artifacts and associated animal fossils, but inaddition, prolonged water-logging means that the deposits alsopreserve bark, fruits, and seeds, some from edible plants, andfragments of wood, including a piece that the Acheulean inhabi-tants appear to have polished. The plant remains allow an unusu-ally detailed reconstruction of the lakeside environment and ofthe way in which Acheulean people may have exploited it. Infurther testimony to GBY’s unique information potential, themeticulous excavations have also revealed discrete clusters ofburned flint chips surrounded by spreads of mainly unburnedartifacts, bones, and vegetal remains. The clusters have been plau-sibly interpreted as the remnants of Acheulean fireplaces, andthey comprise the oldest widely accepted evidence for humanuse of fire.

This Special Issue of the Journal of Human Evolution derivesfrom the multidisciplinary presentations at the Workshop, manyof which emphasized the unique contribution of GBY to our under-standing of Acheulean behavior and ecology. Thus, the followingarticles are intended to bring the benefits of the Workshop toa wider audience, some by addressing aspects of GBY directly,others by placing it in a broader archaeological or paleoenviron-mental context. The Workshop organizers, Naama Goren-Inbarand Baruch Spiro, who also served as guest editors for this specialissue, have asked me to express their gratitude to JHE editor, StevenLeigh, and to his editorial assistants, Natalie Uhl and Jodi Blumen-feld, for their help and support. I thank the organizers for theopportunity to attend the Workshop and to learn more there andin this special issue about the unusually productive multidisci-plinary exploration of a key Acheulean site in both regional andtemporal contexts.

Richard KleinProgram in Human Biology, Stanford University,

Stanford, CA 94305, United StatesE-mail address: [email protected]