33
Prediction and Mitigation of Passing Ship Interaction Effects Scott W. Fenical, PE, D.CE, D.PE Coast & Harbor Engineering, Inc. October 8, 2015 (415) 773-2164 [email protected] DREDGING YOUR DOCKS 2015 Seminar

Prediction and Mitigation of Passing Ship … and Mitigation of Passing Ship ... Passing Vessel Forces MARIN (1974) SURGE SWAY YAW. ... Prediction and Mitigation of Passing Ship Interaction

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Prediction and Mitigation of Passing Ship

Interaction Effects

Scott W. Fenical, PE, D.CE, D.PE

Coast & Harbor Engineering, Inc.

October 8, 2015

(415) 773-2164 [email protected]

DREDGING YOUR DOCKS2015 Seminar

Presentation Outline

• Coast & Harbor Engineering

• Overview of passing ship interaction effects

• Analysis methodology

• Model overview and validations

• Modeling advances

• Mitigation measures

• Conclusions

• Coastal, marine and dredging engineers

• Expertise in coastal processes, coastal and dredging design, and maritime

• Coast & Harbor offices in Corpus Christi, Austin, New Orleans, San Francisco, Seattle, Delray Beach

• 2014 – A Division of Hatch Mott MacDonald

Coast & Harbor Engineering

Passing Ship Interaction Effects

Higher Water

~Still Water ~

Water Level

Depression

Passing Ship Interaction Effects

April 10, 1912 at Southamptonhttp://www.lostliners.com/content/flagships/Titanic/maiden.html

Passing Ship Interaction Effects

ebb current

Passing Ship Interaction Effects

Passing Ship Analysis Methodology

1. Ship hydrodynamic modeling

2. Hydrodynamic fields, load calculations

3. Impact analysis

a. Dynamic mooring analysis

• Mooring lines, bollards, fenders

• Motions, downtime

b. Squat, maneuvering

c. Effects of channel deepening, channel bank

erosion, habitat impacts

Hydrodynamic Model Overview

• Hydrodynamic model generated from CHE’s coastal processes

modeling system

• Incorporates ambient currents, waves, winds, tides

• Expanded to include multiple moving/berthed vessel hull models,

complex maneuvering.

Validation - Field Hydrodynamic DataMRGO

-300

-150

0

150

300

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Time (seconds)

Longitudin

al Load (

metr

ic t

ons) Remery Average

VH-LU Model

Measured Data

-1000

-500

0

500

1000

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Time (seconds)

Late

ral Load (

metr

ic t

ons)

Remery Average

VH-LU Model

Measured Data

-40,000

-20,000

0

20,000

40,000

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Time (seconds)

Mo

men

t (m

etr

ic t

on-m

ete

rs)

Remery Average

VH-LU Model

Measured Data

Validation - Passing Vessel ForcesMARIN (1974)

SURGE SWAY

YAW

Validation - Passing Vessel ForcesMARIN (2010)

-0.25

-0.2

-0.15

-0.1

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

800 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350

Time (sec)

Wa

ter

Su

rfa

ce

Ele

va

tio

n (

m)

Measured

VH-LU Model

-600

-400

-200

0

200

400

600

850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300

Time (sec)

Surg

e F

orc

e (

kN

)

Measured Surge

VH-LU Surge

Measured Sway

VH-LU Sway

-15,000

-10,000

-5,000

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

850 950 1050 1150 1250

Time (sec)

Yaw

Mom

ent

(kN

-m)

Measured Yaw

VH-LU Yaw

Quay

Quay

• Field hydrodynamics• Port of Oakland 1999: containerships in canal-type channel

• MRGO 2005: bulk carrier in trench-type channel

• Corpus Christi Ship Channel 2004: tankers in trench-type channel

• Port Canaveral 2013: cruise ships in canal-type channel

• Laboratory hydrodynamics• Flanders 2009: containerships with submerged bank

• MARIN 2010: containerships with quay

• Laboratory loads• MARIN 1974: tankers in open water

• MARIN 2010: containerships with vertical bulkhead

Model Validation Summary

Modeling Advances

• Maneuvering in Complex Channels

– Changing speed

– Changing drift angle

– Most channels aren’t straight

• Ambient Hydrodynamics

– Steady currents

– Variable current fields near terminals

• Hydrodynamic Phenomena - Surprises

– Bow waves

– Broken bore effects

– Bathtub effects

Route Specification for Complex Channels

• Channels are very complex, and need to avoid using any false

bathymetry for accurate hydrodynamics

• Typically defined with assistance from channel design drawings or

other similar information

• Some channels have “kinks”, can be difficult to prescribe route with

changes in speed and drift angle

• Simulator developed for quick and efficient route development for

passing ship studies

Ship Simulator (Desktop) - Example

Route Generated from Simulator

Vessel Hydrodynamics Using Simulator Route

Vessel Hydrodynamics Using Simulator Route

Ambient Currents

Bow Waves (Solitons)

Bow Waves (Solitons)

Bore Effects

Bore Effects

Photo Location

Bathtub Effects

Bathtub Effects

Disney Dream

5/1/2015

05:30 Arrival

West Gage East Gage

Bathtub Effects

-1.0

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

5/9/14 4:53 5/9/14 4:56 5/9/14 4:59 5/9/14 5:02 5/9/14 5:05 5/9/14 5:08 5/9/14 5:11 5/9/14 5:13

Disney Magic

WSE

[ft]

Date & Time [UTC]

Bathtub Effects

-1.0

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

5/12/14 10:53 5/12/14 10:56 5/12/14 10:59 5/12/14 11:02 5/12/14 11:05 5/12/14 11:08 5/12/14 11:11 5/12/14 11:13

Norweigan Gem

WSE

[ft]

Date & Time [UTC]

Bathtub Effects

Overview of Modeling System Applications

• System has been successfully applied at over 90 different

berths world-wide

• System applied to wide range of vessels including tankers,

barges/barge packs, LNG carriers, cruise ships, destroyers,

submarines, tugs, pontoons

• Many successful recent applications in Texas

• Houston (Port, private)

• Galveston (private)

• Corpus Christi (Port, private)

• Port Arthur (Port, private)

• Beaumont (Private)

Mitigation Measures

• Majority of on-channel projects begin design with preferred

concept, mooring system evolves following initial results

• In confined channel, typically lack of surge restraint is biggest

problem

• Mitigation measures evaluated include:

o More lines in spring service, if possible/safe

o Berth modifications to reduce forces on berthed ships (setback, over-

dredging, end shapes)

o Waterway modifications to facilitate lower-speed transit

o Mooring system enhancements

o Draft limitations at berth

o Mitigation measure effectiveness is very site specific

Conclusions

• Numerical modeling provides accurate passing ship forces

• Efficient and realistic evaluation of vessel hydrodynamic problems

• In confined channels, passing ship forces are a major factor

affecting design of mooring system and berth

• Vessel hydrodynamic evaluations are now becoming a routine

and typical part of terminal development and mooring system

design/upgrade

Prediction and Mitigation of Passing Ship

Interaction Effects

Scott W. Fenical, PE, D.CE, D.PE

Coast & Harbor Engineering, Inc.

October 8, 2015

(415) 773-2164 [email protected]

DREDGING YOUR DOCKS2015 Seminar