2
PRECORDIAL THUMP Precordial Thump and Fist Pacing. ARC and NZRC Guideline 2010 Australian Resuscitation Council, New Zealand Resuscitation Council Introduction A precordial thump is a single sharp blow delivered by the rescuer’s fist to the mid sternum of the victim’s chest. Potential indications The precordial thump may be considered for patients with monitored, pulseless ventricular tachycardia if a defibrillator is not immediately available. [Class B; LOE IV] A precordial thump should not be used in patients with a recent sternotomy (eg. for coronary artery grafts or valve replacement), or recent chest trauma. The precordial thump is relatively ineffective for ventricular fibrilla- tion. 1 There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against the use of the precordial thump for witnessed onset of asystole caused by AV-conduction disturbance. 1 The precordial thump should not be used for unwitnessed cardiac arrest. 1 Technique In the case of pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrilla- tion, if a defibrillator is not immediately available, the clenched fist of the rescuer is held approximately 25–30 cm (10–12 inches) above the sternum of the victim. The fist is then brought down sharply so the inside (medial, ulna) side of the fist makes contact with the mid- sternum of the victim’s chest. The precordial thump should not be taught as an isolated technique. It should be taught as part of an ALS course in which the student learns to identify life threatening arrhythmias and the appropriate steps to undertake if the chest thump fails. It is best taught with the skill of defibrillation. Discussion In five prospective case series of out-of-hospital and two series of in-hospital VF cardiac arrest, healthcare provider administration of the precordial thump did not result in ROSC. In three prospective case series of ventricular tachycardia in the electrophysiology lab administration of the precordial thump by experienced cardiologists was of limited use (1.3% ROSC). When events occurred outside of the electrophysiology lab, in 6 case series of in and out of the hospital VT the precordial thump was followed by ROSC in 19% of patients. Rhythm deterioration following pre- cordial thump occurred in 3% of patients and was observed pre- dominantly in patients with prolonged ischemia or digitalis-induced toxicity. In three case series of asystolic arrest the precordial thump, but not fist-pacing, was sometimes successful in promoting ROSC when administered by health care providers to patients with witnessed asystole (some clearly p-wave asystolic arrest) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). 1 Two case series and a case report documented the potential for complications from use of the precordial thump including sternal fracture, osteomyelitis, stroke, and rhythm deterioration in adults and children. 1 Percussion (FIST) pacing The administration of serial rhythmic blows to the chest has been proposed as a technique to provide mechanical pacing until an elec- trical pacemaker is available. There is little evidence supporting fist or percussion pacing in cardiac arrest, particularly when the effect of the maneuver cannot be confirmed by continuous electrocardiographic monitoring and assessment of a pulse. Evidence consists of six single-patient case reports and a moderate sized case series with mixed asystole and bradycardia. 1 doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01422_11.x Emergency Medicine Australasia (2011) 23, 275–276 © 2011 The Authors EMA © 2011 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine and Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine

Precordial Thump and Fist Pacing. ARC and NZRC Guideline 2010

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

PRECORDIAL THUMP

Precordial Thump and Fist Pacing. ARC andNZRC Guideline 2010Australian Resuscitation Council, New Zealand Resuscitation Council

Introduction

A precordial thump is a single sharp blow delivered by the rescuer’sfist to the mid sternum of the victim’s chest.

Potential indications

The precordial thump may be considered for patients with monitored,pulseless ventricular tachycardia if a defibrillator is not immediatelyavailable. [Class B; LOE IV]A precordial thump should not be used in patients with a recentsternotomy (eg. for coronary artery grafts or valve replacement), orrecent chest trauma.The precordial thump is relatively ineffective for ventricular fibrilla-tion.1

There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against the use ofthe precordial thump for witnessed onset of asystole caused byAV-conduction disturbance.1

The precordial thump should not be used for unwitnessed cardiacarrest.1

Technique

In the case of pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrilla-tion, if a defibrillator is not immediately available, the clenched fist ofthe rescuer is held approximately 25–30 cm (10–12 inches) above thesternum of the victim. The fist is then brought down sharply so theinside (medial, ulna) side of the fist makes contact with the mid-sternum of the victim’s chest.The precordial thump should not be taught as an isolated technique.It should be taught as part of an ALS course in which the studentlearns to identify life threatening arrhythmias and the appropriatesteps to undertake if the chest thump fails. It is best taught with theskill of defibrillation.

Discussion

In five prospective case series of out-of-hospital and two series ofin-hospital VF cardiac arrest, healthcare provider administration ofthe precordial thump did not result in ROSC.In three prospective case series of ventricular tachycardia in theelectrophysiology lab administration of the precordial thump byexperienced cardiologists was of limited use (1.3% ROSC). Whenevents occurred outside of the electrophysiology lab, in 6 case seriesof in and out of the hospital VT the precordial thump was followedby ROSC in 19% of patients. Rhythm deterioration following pre-cordial thump occurred in 3% of patients and was observed pre-dominantly in patients with prolonged ischemia or digitalis-inducedtoxicity.In three case series of asystolic arrest the precordial thump, but notfist-pacing, was sometimes successful in promoting ROSC whenadministered by health care providers to patients with witnessedasystole (some clearly p-wave asystolic arrest) for out-of-hospitalcardiac arrest (OHCA) and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA).1

Two case series and a case report documented the potential forcomplications from use of the precordial thump including sternalfracture, osteomyelitis, stroke, and rhythm deterioration in adults andchildren.1

Percussion (FIST) pacing

The administration of serial rhythmic blows to the chest has beenproposed as a technique to provide mechanical pacing until an elec-trical pacemaker is available.There is little evidence supporting fist or percussion pacing incardiac arrest, particularly when the effect of the maneuver cannotbe confirmed by continuous electrocardiographic monitoring andassessment of a pulse. Evidence consists of six single-patient casereports and a moderate sized case series with mixed asystole andbradycardia.1

doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01422_11.x Emergency Medicine Australasia (2011) 23, 275–276

© 2011 The AuthorsEMA © 2011 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine and Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine

RecommendationFor patients in cardiac arrest, percussion (fist) pacing is not recom-mended.1 However, percussion (fist) pacing may be considered inhaemodynamically unstable bradyarrhythmias until an electricalpacemaker (transcutaneous or transvenous) is available.2

References

1. Koster RW, Sayre MR, Botha M, Cave DM, Cudnik MT, HandleyAJ, et al. Part 5: Adult basic life support: 2010 International

consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency car-diovascular care science with treatment recommendations.Resuscitation. [doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.005].2010;81(1, Supplement 1):e48–e70.

2. Deakin CD, Morrison LJ, Morley PT, Callaway CW, Kerber RE,Kronick SL, et al. Part 8: Advanced life support: 2010 InternationalConsensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and EmergencyCardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.Resuscitation. [doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.027].2010;81(1, Supplement 1):e93–e174.

Australian Resuscitation Council, New Zealand Resuscitation Council

276 © 2011 The AuthorsEMA © 2011 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine and Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine