23
Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum

Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

National Geodetic Vertical Datum 1929 (NGVD 29) Defined by heights of 26 tidal stations in U.S. and Canada Tide gages were connected to the network by leveling from tide gage staffs to bench marks Water-level transfers used to connect leveling across Great Lakes Normal Orthometric Heights: – H* = C /  – C = model (“normal”) geopotential number –  = from normal gravity formula H* = 0 level is NOT a level surface

Citation preview

Page 1: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum

Precise Digital Leveling

Section 6Vertical Datum

Page 2: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum

Vertical Datum• Local/Regional

– Assumed– City, County– International Great Lakes Datum 1955 (IGLD55)– International Great Lakes Datum 1985 (IGLD85)– Tidal Datums

• National– National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD29)– North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88)

Page 3: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum

National Geodetic Vertical Datum 1929(NGVD 29)

• Defined by heights of 26 tidal stations in U.S. and Canada

• Tide gages were connected to the network by leveling from tide gage staffs to bench marks

• Water-level transfers used to connect leveling across Great Lakes

• Normal Orthometric Heights:– H* = C / – C = model (“normal”) geopotential number– = from normal gravity formula

• H* = 0 level is NOT a level surface

Page 4: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum

First-Order Leveling Network NGVD 29

Page 5: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum

North American Vertical Datum 1988 (NAVD 88)• Defined by one height (Father Point/Rimouski)

• Water-level transfers connect leveling across Great Lakes

• Adjustment performed in Geopotential Numbers

• Helmert Orthometric Heights:– H = C / (g + 0.0424 H0)– C = geopotential number– g = surface gravity measurement (mgals)– H0 = approximate orthometric height (km)

• H = 0 level is nearly a level surface

• H = 0 level is biased relative to global mean sea level

Page 6: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum

Vertical Control Network NAVD 88

Page 7: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum

NGVD 29 Versus NAVD 88NGVD 29 Versus NAVD 88Datum Considerations: NGVD 29 NAVD 88• Defining Height(s) 26 Local MSL 1 Local MSL •Tidal Epoch Various 1960-78

(18.6 years)

Treatment of Leveling Data:• Gravity Correction Ortho Correction Geopotential Nos.

(normal gravity) (observed gravity)

• Other Corrections Level, Rod, Temp. Level, Rod, Astro, Temp, Magnetic, and Refraction Adjustments Considerations:

• Method Least-squares Least-squares

• Technique Condition Eq. Observation Eq.

• Units of Measure Meters Geopotential Units

• Observation Type Links Between Height Differences Junction Points Between Adjacent BMs

Page 8: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum

NGVD 29 Versus NAVD 88 (continued)NGVD 29 Versus NAVD 88 (continued)Adjustments Statistics : NGVD 29 NAVD 88

• No. of Bench Marks 100,000 (est) 450,000 (US only)• Km of Leveling Data 75,159 (US) 1,001,500

31,565 (Canada)

Published Information:

• Orthometric Height Type Normal Helmert

• Orthometric Height Units Meters Meters

• Gravity Value Normal “Actual”

Page 9: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum
Page 10: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum
Page 11: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum
Page 12: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum

Tidal DatumTidal Datum• Heights Measured Above Local Mean Sea Level

• National Tidal Datum epoch; 19 year series

• Encompasses all significant tidal periods including 18.6 year period for regression of Moon’s nodes

• Averages out nearly all meteorological, hydrological, and oceanographic variability

• Leveling is used to determine relationship between bench marks and tidal gauges

Page 13: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum
Page 14: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum

http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/

Page 15: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum

NAVD 88 minusNAVD 88 minusLMSL (1960-1978)LMSL (1960-1978)

(units = cm)

Page 16: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum
Page 17: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum
Page 18: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum
Page 19: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum

Point Reyes, Drakes Bay, CaliforniaFT

Page 20: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum
Page 21: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum
Page 22: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum

Geodetic and Tidal

Geodetic and Tidal Datum Relationships

Page 23: Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum

AL, AK, CA, CT, FL, GA, LA, MD, MS, NJ, NY, NC, OR, RI, SC, WA

Privately Owned

Uplands

State Owned

Tidelands

Territorial Seas

State Submerged Lands

Contiguous Zone

Exclusive Economic Zone

Federal Submerged LandsHigh Seas

Privately Owned

State Owned

TX

3 n. mi.12 n. mi.

200 n. mi.

Privately Owned

State Owned

DE, MA, ME, NH, PA, VA

MHHWMHW

MLLW

Importance of Shoreline

Chart Datum