Pre-Exercise Feeding of Sugar on Substrate Depletion

  • Upload
    tnyxee

  • View
    216

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 Pre-Exercise Feeding of Sugar on Substrate Depletion

    1/5

    Nutr ition and Physical Ac tiv ity

    Preexercise Feedings of Glucose, Fructose or Sucrose:Effects on Substrate Depletion in Rats1'2ELIZABETH E. ADDIN GTON AND K ATHARINE K. GRUNEW ALD3Dep artm en t o f F ood s an d N utritio n, K an sa s S tate un iversity, M anha tta n, K S 66 506

    ABSTRACT MaleWi st ar rats ( n = 72) t ra in ed t o runon a t re adm illw e re f as ted ove rn igh t and f ed bygavage 3 m l unsupplemen tedw ater or a solu tion con tainin g 2 g of glu cose, fru ctose or sucrose 30 m in p rior t o exercise. S ix rats from each dietary grou pw ere k illed a fter 0 , 1 o r 2 h o f exe rcise . B lo od glu co se lev els d ecrea se d in all g ro up s o ver th e 2-h ex ercise p erio d; h ow ev er, th ela rg es t d ec lin e in b lo od g lu co se w as e xh ib ite d b y th e r ats fe d uns upplemente d wate r (-3 2.1%), fo llowe d by th ose fe d fr uc to se(-26.9% ), sucrose (-13.9% ) and glucose (-8.3% ). T he w ater-fed con trol rats also had the largest increase in circulatin gfr ee f atty a c id s ( + 2 15 .4%), fo llowe dby th os e fe d f ru cto se ( + 12 0.8%), su cr ose ( + 6 9.2%) and g lu co se ( + 5 7.5%). T he fr uc to se -fe d anima ls e xh ib ite d th e g re ate st d ep le tio n o f liv er g ly co ge n and th e sma lle st d ec lin e in s ole us a nd r ed v astu s la te ra lis mu sc leg ly co ge n o f th e r ats fe d th e d iffe re nt c ar bohydr ate s. T he d ata in dic ate th at e xe rc is e-in du ce d c hang es in s ub str ate le ve ls c an b em od ified b y th e ty pe of ca rb oh yd rate g iv en p rio r to exe rcise . J . N utr. 1 17 : 5 93 -5 97 , 19 87 .INDEXING KEY WORDS:g ly cogen exe rc is e carbohyd ra te s

    Human studies have shown that the major energysources used during exercise are fatty acids, glucosefrom blood or muscle glycogen and, to a lesser extent,am ino acids (1-5). The use of these substrates is en-zym atically controlled and lim ited according to the intensity (6) and duration (1, 7) of the exercise, as well asthe subject's absorptive state (8) and previous level oftraining (9, 10).Preexercise feedings m ay also affect substrate utilization during exercise. G lucose ingestion prior to exercise resulted in an increased rate of carbohydrate oxidation (11, 12), stim ulatio n of gly cogen utilization (13)and rebound hypoglycem ia (13-16). The effects of fructose feeding, however, were different in that subjectsexhibited a slower rise in blood glucose (13-16), lowerinsulin response (14-6)and less depletion of m uscleglycogen (13, 14) than w hen glucose feeding w as tested.None of the studies cited above compared the effectof sucrose to those of glucose or fructose. Because sucrose consists of equimolar parts of glucose and fructose and is readily available to exercising subjects, itscom parison to other carbohydrates is warranted. In addition, preexercise carbohydra te feeding s h ave not b eenadequately ex am ined for their effects on liver gly cogen,which is an im portant source of blood glucose.The present study was designed to compare the ef

    fects of preexercise feedings of glucose, fructose,, sucrose or unsupplem ented water on glycogen contentsin the liver and several selected muscles during a 2-hbout of exercise in trained rats. This study shows thatthe changes in substrate levels that occur during exercise can be m odified by the type of carbohydrate givenprior to exercise and that those changes vary accordingto the tissue studied.MATERIALS AND METHODS

    S eve nty-tw o m ale w ean ling W istar rats (H SD : W I:BR,H ar anSpragu e-D aw ley, In dia napo lis , IN ) w eig hin g 4 0-70 g each were housed individually in stainless steelcages in a temperature-controlled room (21 1C)maintained on a 12-h light-dark cycle. The animals'T his s tu dy w as su pp orted b y the K an sas A gric ultura l E xp erim en tS ta ti on , c on tr ib ut io n No. 8 6-4 00 -J .2A prelim inary report of these data w as presented at the 1986 A n

    nual M eeting of the F ederation of the American S ocieties for E xperim ental Biology, St. Louis, M O. Addington, E. E . & Grunewald,K . K . 11986| P reexercise feedings of glucose, fructose, or sucrose:effects on fuel hom eostasis in rats. F ed. P roc. 45: 972 (abs.).3T o w hom co rres po nd en ce sh ou ld be ad dres sed .0022-3166/87 $3.00 1987 American Institute of N utrition. R eceived: 28 A pril 1986. A ccepted: 4 N ovem ber 1986.

    59 3

  • 8/2/2019 Pre-Exercise Feeding of Sugar on Substrate Depletion

    2/5

    59 4 A DD IN GTON A ND GRU NEWALDw ere fed a nonpurified diet (5 001 Rodent LaboratoryChow, Ralston Purina, St. Louis, MO) and water adlibitum thro ughout the study .When the rats weighed approximately 200 g, theybeg an a training pro gram on a zero -g rade treadmill (Ra-diotrol Treadmill, 1/2 hp, Boston Gears, Quincy, MA )for 2 w k prior to the planned day of killing. A progressiv e ex ercise schedule w as fo llowed until animals co uldrun comfortably at 18 rn/min for 30 min/d. At the endof the training period, the rats w ere w eighed and fastedovernight (12-16 h). Rats were not exercised the daybe fore the trial s.On the day of the trials, the rats were given preex-ercise feedings by gastric lavage 30 min prior to exercise. The feeding solutions were 3 ml distilled w atercontaining no additional carbohydrate (co ntrol) or 2 gof glucose, fructose or sucrose, Thirty minutes afterreceiving the feedings, animals were placed on thetreadmill and exercised at 18 m/min. This speed allowed all animals to comple te their desig nated runningtimes without undue fatigue or injury. Within eachdietary group, six rats were killed at each of the following time intervals: prior to exercise (30 min afterfeeding) or after 1 or 2 h of exercise.A fter exercising for the allotted period of time, ratsw ere anesthetized w ith sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg) and 8-10 ml of blood was drawn via cardiac puncture, allowed to clot and centrifuged at 5000 x g for12 min. Serum was frozen at - 18Cor later analysiso f g luc ose, free fatty acids and blo od urea nitro gen. Thepyramidal lo be of the liver and right hindlimb musclesincluding the soleus and red and w hite portions of thevas tus late ralis were identifi ed as pre vious ly de sc ribed(17). Great care was taken to isolate consistently the

    same muscle tissue in each rat. Tissues were excisedas quickly as possible, weighed to the nearest 0.001 g,frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at - 18Cuntilanalys is f or g lycogen.B lo od g luco se was dete rmined by the g luco se o xidas emethod (Sigma Kit No. 510, Sigma Chemical Co., St.Louis, MO). Muscle and liv er glycogen w ere measuredby the phenol-sulfuric acid method for small tissuesamples (1 8). B lo od free fatty acids (FFA ) w ere assay edby a co lo rimetrie micromethod based on the fo rmatio nof FFA Cu soaps (19). Blood urea nitrogen (BU N) wasmeasured by a colorimetrie procedure (Sigma Kit N o.535, Sigma Chemical Co.).Statistical differences w ere assessed by least significant differences tests follo wing significant (P

  • 8/2/2019 Pre-Exercise Feeding of Sugar on Substrate Depletion

    3/5

    CA R BOHY D RA TE FEEDIN GS A N D EX ER CIS E 595f ed f ructose ( + 120.8% ), sucrose ( + 6 9.2% ) and glucose(+ 57.5%).BUN levels w ere sim ilar 30 m in af ter feeding butincreased in all groups during the ex ercise period. T hegreatest increase in B UN levels w as m anifested by thefructose-fed rats ( + 41.9%), follow ed by those f ed un-supplem ented w ater ( + 39.1% ), glucose ( + 16.1% ) andsucro se ( + 1.9% ).Liver and muscle glycogen. The effects of preexer-cise feedings on liv er and m uscle gly cogen contents areshow n in T able 2. T here w ere no dif ferences betw eengroups in liv er gly cogen 30 m in af ter the f eedings. H owever, rats in all groups exhibited a decline in liv er glycogen during the ex ercise period. T he greatest declinein liv er gly cogen w as ex hibited by the rats fed fructoseor unsupplem ented w ater, w here nearly half of the initial gly cogen lev els had been depleted during the 2-hrun. A sm aller decline in liv er gly cogen w as noted forrats f ed g lucose or sucrose.Ef fects of ex ercise and carbohy drate f eedings on glycogen contents in three dif ferent ty pes of m uscle tissuew ere also ex am ined. N o consistent ef fects on m usclegly cogen w ere noted in the w hite portion of the vastuslateralis. How ever, m uscle gly cogen lev els w ere reduced during exercise in the soleus and red portion ofthe v astus lateralis m uscle tissues of rats in all dietarygroups. T he f ructose-f ed rats ex hibited the sm allest decline in gly cogen contents in those tissues.

    DISCUSSIONT he ef fects of feeding v arious carbohy drates prior toex ercise hav e been com pared in sev eral hum an studiesw ith dif fering results. In tw o studies (13, 14) f ructose-fed subjects exhibited a sm aller reduction in m usclegly cogen during ex ercise than those fed glucose, but nodif ferences w ere observ ed betw een those treatm ents ina third study (16). T he lack of agreem ent m ight be attributed to dif ferences in ex perim ental protocol andalso to the fact that dif ferent m uscles w ere studied.Only one m uscle w as exam ined in each study .In our trial the ef fects of preex ercise carbohy dratef eedings w ere determ ined on gly cogen contents in threedif ferent ty pes of m uscle during exercise in rats. T hem uscles studied w ere the soleus, w hich has predom inantly red type I slow tw itch ox idativ e m uscle f ibers,and the vastus lateralis, w hich has both red and w hiteportions consisting prim arily of red ty pe H a f ast tw itchox idativ e gly coly tic and w hite type lib fast tw itch gly -

    coly tic f ibers, respectiv ely (21).W e found that rats run on a treadm ill for 2 h ex hibiteda gly cogen reduction in m uscles that contained predom inantly red f ibers, i.e., the soleus and red portion of the w hite v astus m uscle. T hese observationsh av e b een rep orted p rev io usly f or treadm ill-ex ercisedrats (2 2).W e further found that the decline in m uscle gly cogen

    TABL E 2E ffe ct of pr ee xe rcise ca rb oh ydr ate fee din gs o n g ly co ge n co nten ts in live r, so le usand red and w hite vastus lateralis m uscles in rats du ring 2 h of exercise1

    TissueLiver,m g/g w ettControlFructoseSucroseGlucoseSoleus,

    m g/g w ettControlFructoseSucroseGlucoseRed

    v astus, m g/g w ettControlFructoseSucroseGlucoseW hite

    v astus, m g/g w ettControlFructoseSucroseGlucose05.62

    .99"6.13 .99"7.66 .99"7.04 .00'3.35 .36"b2.91 .36"3.97 .36'4.06 .37b7.57 .09"7.70 .11"9.67 .99"8.97 .13*4.50 .92"3.98 .93"4.59 .92"4.99 0.93"Hours

    ofunning12.26

    .00a3.71 .02"4.98 .02'b7.67 .99"2.25 .37"2.98 .37"b4.08 .37"3.51 .36bc6.31 .01"6.67 .15"8.40 .03"9.00 .003.71 .934.12 .95"6.15 .95"4.50 0.92"22.92

    .00"3.17 .026.66 .03b4.97 .99"b2.43 .37"2.86 .37"3.01 .382.84 .36"5.90 .01"7.40 .025.48 .13"5.96 .99"2.61 .93"4.09 .95'b5.51 .96"b3.95 0.92bPercent

    change-48

    13.05-29.4

    3.02+20.04-20.8'V alues are m eans S EMf or six rats. M eans w ithin each group colum n not sharing a comm on superscript letter are signif icantly dif ferent,P < 0.05. R ats w ere fed the preexercise feedings 30 m in before tim e 0.

    http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/
  • 8/2/2019 Pre-Exercise Feeding of Sugar on Substrate Depletion

    4/5

    59 6 A DDINGTON A ND GRUN EW A LDcould be m odif ied by the ty pe of carbohy drate fed priorto ex ercise. T he f ructose-f ed rats had a sm aller declinein soleus and red v astus gly cogen than those f ed glucoseor sucrose, suggesting that f ructose f eeding is associated w ith a sparing ef fect on gly cogen use in thosemu scles d urin g ex ercise.T he sparing of m uscle gly cogen in the f ructose-fedrats m ight be attributed to increased utiliz ation of otheren erg y so urces d urin g ex ercise. L iv er g ly co gen an d b lo odglucose lev els decreased m ore f or the f ructose-f ed ratsthan f or those f ed the other carbohy drates, suggestingthat f ructose f eeding prior to ex ercise has dif ferent effects on the av ailability or utilization of those fuelsources.A lthough it is dif f icult to explain the observ ed eff ects, the energy prov ided by f ructose m ay hav e becom eavailable at a low er rate than that from the other carbohy drates. Fructose disappears m ore slow ly from therat intestine than m ost other m onosaccharides (23) andis m etaboliz ed principally in the liv er (24) so that littleenters the general circulation. Feeding studies haveshow n that f ructose su ppresses liv er gly cogen sy nthesis(25) and increases gluco neogenesis (2 6).T he fructose-f ed rats also had the greatest rise incirculating FFA of the rats fed the dif f erent carbohydrates. T hese f indings m ight be ex plained by the low erinsulin response to f ructose than glucose f eedings (27).It is w ell k now n that insulin suppresses the m obiliz ation of fatty acids from adipose tissue, and m ore fattyacids m ay have been available for energy in rats fedfructose prior to ex ercise. Hum an studies hav e show nthat the uptak e of FFA by exercising m uscle is proportional to serum concentration (1, 2).N ew sholm e and S tart (28) found that serum FFA levels decreased f ollow ing an oral glucose load; how ev er,w e did not observ e any dif ferences w hen com paringFFA lev els of w ater-fed rats w ith those of rats f ed thedif ferent carbohy drates 30 m in af ter feedings. It is possible that the trained condition of our rats altered theirre sp on se to th e carb oh yd rate f eed in gs. E xercise train in gin rats has been found to increase lipoly sis during a fast(29), alter insulin sensitiv ity (30, 31) and dim inish therate of gly cogen depletion during ex ercise (32).T he ef fects of sucrose w ere com pared w ith those ofglucose and fructose in our study . During the ex erciseperiod, the sucrose-f ed rats ex hibited changes in serumglucose and FFA interm ediate betw een those of rats fedglucose and f ructose. How ever, the sucrose-fed ratstended to have the highest m easured lev els of bloodglucose throughout the ex ercise period. T he reason forthis f inding is not clear; in a prev ious study (33) ratsfed 2-g m eals containing sucrose had a greater rise inblood reducing sugar lev els than rats fed sim ilar m ealsco ntain in g g lu co se o r f ru cto se.Our inv estigation conf irm s m any prev ious hum anand rodent studies show ing that ex ercise is accompanied by a progressiv e decrease in blood glucose (1,34), liv er gly cogen (22) and m uscle gly cogen (14, 22, 35)

    and a concom itant rise in circulating FFA (1, 16, 34).B ut w e also found that these changes could be m odif iedby the type of carbohydrate giv en 30 m in prior to exercise. O f the carbohydrates tested, f ructose w as associated w ith the greatest sparing of m uscle gly cogen;and w e postulate that this m ay have occurred at theex pense of alternativ e fuel sources such as liv er glycogen and FFA .B ecause there is som e indication that endurance m aybe enhanced by a greater av ailability of fatty acids (34,36), future studies m ight be directed tow ard a com parison of the ef fects of preex ercise carbohy drate f eedingso n th is cap acity .

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTSW e thank Dallas Johnson, Departm ent of S tatistics,K ansas S tate Univ ersity , for his help w ith statisticalprocedures and K az uk o S ak am oto and K om alam Jariajf or their assistance during the ex ercise trials.

    L IT ER A T UR E C IT ED1. A H L BORG ,G. , FELIG,P ., HA GENFELDT,. , HENDLER,R . & W A H RENJ. (1974) S ubstrate turnov er during prolonged ex ercise in m an.S planchnic and leg m etabolism of glucose, f ree f atty acids, andam in o ac id s. /. C lin . In ve st. 5 3: 1 08 0-1 09 0.2. FEL IG ,P. & W A H REN ,J. (1975) Fuel hom eostasis in ex ercise.N. Eng l. I. Med. 2 93 : 1 07 8-10 84 .3. W A H REN ,J. (1977) G lucose turnov er during ex ercise in m an.Ann. NYAcad. Sci. 301: 45-55.4. W A H REN ,J., H A GEN FEL DT ,. & FEU G, P. (1975) G lucose andf ree f atty acid utiliz ation in ex ercise. S T. .M ed. S ci. 11: 551

    559.5. L EM ON ,P. W . R . & N A GL E,F. ]. (1981) Ef fects of ex ercise onprotein and am ino acid m etabolism . M ed. S ci. S ports Ex ercise13: 141-149 .6. S A L TIN ,B . & K A R L SS ON ,. (1971) M uscle gly cogen utiliz ationduring w ork at dif ferent intensities. In: M uscle M etabolism during Exe rc is e ( Pe rnow, B. & Sa lti n, B., e ds .| , pp. 2 89 -3 00 , P le numPublishing C orp., N ew Y o rk .7. ES SEN , B. (1977) Intram uscular substrate utiliz ation duringprolonged ex ercise. A n n. N Y A c ad. S ci. 301: 30-44.8. A H LB OR G,G . & FEL IG ,P. (1977) S ubstrate utiliz ation duringp ro lo ng ed ex erc is e p rec ed ed b y in gestio n of g lu co se. A w . ], Phy s-i ol . 2 33 : E188-E194 .9 . HENR IK S SON ,. (1977] T raining induced adaptation of sk eletalm u scle an d m e tab olism d urin g su bm ax im al ex erc is e. /. Ph ysio l.(Land. ) 270: 661-675 .10. B R OOK S,G. A . & DO NOV A N ,C. M . (1983) Ef fect of endurancetrainin g o n g luc ose k in etic s d urin g ex erc is e. A m . /. Ph ysio l. 2 44 :E505-E512.1 1. FO S TE R,C , COS TIL L ,D . L . & FIN K ,W .} . (1979) Ef fects of preexercise f eedings on endurance perf orm ance. M ed. S ci. S ports Exercise 1 1: 1 -5 .12. M cM uR RA Y , R . G ., W IL SO N,I. R . & K rrcH EL L,B . S . (1983) T heef fects of f ructose and glucose on high intensity endurance perf orm an ce. R es. Q . E xerc ise S po rt 5 4: 1 56 -1 62 .13. H A R GR EA V E S,M ., COST ILL , D. L ., K A TZ , A . & FINK , W . ](1985) Ef fect of fructose ingestion on m uscle gly cogen usaged urin g ex ercise. M e d. S ci. S ports E xe rcise 17 : 3 60 -3 63 .14. L EV IN E,L ., E V ANS ,W . I ., CADARETTE, . S . , FI SHER ,E. C . & B UL LE

    http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/
  • 8/2/2019 Pre-Exercise Feeding of Sugar on Substrate Depletion

    5/5

    CA R BOHY DR A TE FEEDIN GS A N D EX ER CISE 5 97B . A . (1983) Fructose and glucose ingestion and m uscle gly -c og en u se d urin g s ubmax imal e x erc is e. / . A p p i. Ph y sio l. 5 5:1 76 7-1771.

    15 . K O I VIS TO ,V . A , K ARONEN,S. L . & NIK K ILA ,E. A . (1981)Carb oh yd rate i ng es tio n b ef ore e xe rc is e: c omp aris on o f g lu co se ,f ru cto se, an d s w ee t p lac eb o. /. A p pi. Phy sio l. 5 1: 7 83-7 87 .16 . K O I VIS TO ,. A ., H A R KONEN,M ., K A RONEN ,. L ., G R OO P,P . H .,ELOVA INIO ,R ., FE R RANN IN I,E., S A CC A ,L . & D EFR ON Z O,R . A .( 19 85 ) G ly c og en d ep le ti on d urin g p ro lo ng ed e x erc is e: in flu en ceo f g lu co se , f ru cto se , o r p lace bo. /. A p pi. Ph ysio l. 5 8: 7 31-7 37 .17. FlT T S, R . H ., COURTR IGHT , J. B ., K lM , D. H . & W lTZMANN, F. A .(19 82 ) M u scle f atig ue w ith p ro lo ng ed e xercise : co ntractile an db io chem ical alte ratio ns. A m . ]. Phy sio l. 2 42 : C 65 -C 73 .18. L o, S ., R US SEL L,. C . & T A Y L OR ,A . W . (1970) D eterm inationof gly cogen in sm all tissue sam ples. /. A ppi. Phy siol. 28: 234-236.19. N OM A , A ., O KA BE,H., & M . K IT A (1973) A new colorim etriem icrodeterm ination of f ree f atty acids in serum . C lin. C him .Acta 43: 317-320.2 0. S NEDECOR ,G. W . & COCHR A N,W . G. (1967) S tatistical M ethods, I owa State Univer si t y P ress, Ames.21. A R IA N O,M . A ., A R M ST RO NG ,R . B . & EDGER TON ,V . R . (1973)H indlim b m uscle populations of f iv e m am m als. /. H istochem .Cytochem. 21: 51-55 .22. B A LDW IN ,K . M ., R EITMAN ,J. S ., T ER IUNG,R . L ., W I NDER ,W . W .& HOL L OS Z Y ,. O . (1973) S ubstrate depletion in dif ferent ty pesof m uscle and liv er during prolonged running. A m . /. Phy siol.225: 1045-1050.23. COR I, C. F. 11925) T he fate of sugar in the anim al body . I. T herate of absorption of hex oses and pentoses f rom the intestinaltract. /. B iol. C hem 66: 691-715.24. C HEN ,M . & WH IS TL ER , . L . (1977) M etabolism of D -f ructose.Adv. Car bohydr . Chem. 34: 285- 343.25. V RA NA , A ., FA BRY , P., K A ZDOV A , L. & ZV OLA NKOV A ,K .(1 97 8) E ff ect of th e ty pe an d p rop ortio n o f d ietary carb oh yd rateo n se ru m g lu co se le vels and liv er and m u scle g ly co gen sy nth esisin the rat. N utr. M etab. 22: 313-320.26. E X TON ,J. H . & .PA R K ,C . R . (1969) C ontrol of gluconeogenesis

    i n th e li ve r. I II . E ff ec t o f L -lac tat e, p y ru v at e, f ru ct os e, g lu cag on ,e pin eph rine , an d ad en osin e 3 ',5 '-m o no ph osp hate o n g lu co neo -genic interm ediates in perfused rat liv er. /. B iol. Chem . 244:1424-1433.27. C RY E R, A ., R IL EY , S. E., W IL LIA M S ,E. R . & ROBIN SON ,D. S .(1 974 ) E ff ects of f ruc to se, su cro se an d g luc ose f ee din g o n p lasm ain su lin co nce ntratio ns an d o n ad ip os e-tiss ue clearin g-f acto r li-pase activ ity in the rat. B iochem . ]. 140: 561-563.28. N EW S HOL ME,. A . & S TA R T,C. (1973) R egulation in M etabol ism, pp. 227-228, Wi ley, New Yor k.2 9. GUE ZENNEC ,C . Y . , S ER R UR IE R,., A Y MONOD,M ., M ER IN O,D . &PESQUIES,P. C. (1984) M etabolic and horm onal response toshort term f asting af ter endurance training in the rat. H arm .Metab . Res. 16: 572-575.3 0. JAME S ,D . E ., B UR LE IGH,K . M ., K RA EGEN ,E. W ., & . C H IS HO LM ,D . J. (1983) Ef fect of acute ex ercise and prolonged training oninsulin response to intrav enous glucose in v iv o in rat. /. A ppi.Physio l . 55: 1660-1664.3 1. T A NCREDE,G ., ROUSSEAU -M IGNERON ,. & N ADEA U,A . (1982)B enef icial ef fects of phy sical training in rats w ith a m ild strep-to zoto cin -in du ce d diab ete s m e llitu s. D iabe te s 3 1, 4 06 -40 9.32. B A LDW IN ,K . M ., FIT TS ,R . H ., B OO TH ,F. W ., W IN DER ,W . W . &HOL L OS Z Y ,. O . (1975) D epletion of m uscle and liv er gly cogend uri ng e xe rc is e. Pf lu eg ers A r ch . 3 54 : 2 03 -2 12 .33. N A IS M IT H,D . ]. & R A N A ,I. A . (1974) S ucrose and hy perlipi-daem ia. II. T he relationship betw een the rates of digestion andabsorption of dif ferent carbohy drates and their ef fects on enz ym es of tissue lipogenesis. N utr. M etab. 16: 285-294.34. DOHM , G. L ., T A PS COT T,E. B ., B A RA K ET ,H. A . & KA SPEREK ,G . J. (1983) Inf luence of f asting on gly cogen depletion in ratsdu rin g ex ercise. /. A p pi. Phy sio l. 5 5: 8 30 -8 33 .35. H ERMA N S EN ,., HUL TMAN ,E., & S AL TIN ,B . (1967) M uscle glyco gen d urin g p ro lo ng ed se ve re e xe rcise . A c ta Ph ysio l. S cand . 7 1:129-139.3 6. H ICK SON ,R . C ., R E NN IE ,M . I., CONL EE ,R . K ., W I NDER ,W . W . &HOL LO SZ Y ,. O . (1977) Ef fects of increased plasm a f atty acidso n g ly co ge n u tiliz atio n and e ndu ranc e. /. A p pi. Ph ysiol. 4 3: 82 9-833.

    http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/http://jn.nutrition.org/