14
Outline the significance of the pre-adjusted Edgewise appliance system and useful bracket variations in orthodontics Dr MJ Rowland-Warmann BSc BDS (Manc) MSc Aes.Med. (Lond) MJDF RCS (Eng) GDC: 178642 Word Count (excluding references): 1680 Module 4: Fundamentals of Orthodontic Treatment of Skeletal Problems in Preadolescence and Adolescence Submission December 2017 Student ID BP0150715

Pre-adjusted edgewise 2 - Smileworks...Bracket variations for different scenarios As the prescription on an individual bracket is known, variations can be employed when there is a

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Outlinethesignificanceofthepre-adjustedEdgewiseappliance

systemandusefulbracketvariationsinorthodontics

DrMJRowland-WarmannBScBDS(Manc)MScAes.Med.(Lond)MJDFRCS(Eng)

GDC:178642

WordCount(excludingreferences):1680

Module4:FundamentalsofOrthodonticTreatmentofSkeletalProblemsinPreadolescence

andAdolescence

SubmissionDecember2017

StudentIDBP0150715

Contents

Page

Introduction 3

Modernbracketprescriptionsandtheirevolution 3

Andrews 4

Roth 4

MBT 4

Bracketvariationsfordifferentscenarios 6

Palatallyplacedlateralincisors 7

Absentlateralincisors 8

Class3canineangulation 8

Labialmovementofpalatalcanine 9

Caninegingivalrecession 9

Absentuppercentralincisor 9

Incisorsinclass3 10

Upperpremolarsubstitutingcanine 10

Casefinishing 10

Doestheprescriptionmatter? 11

Conclusion 13

References 14

Outlinethesignificanceofthepre-adjustedEdgewiseappliancesystemand

usefulbracketvariations(suchaschangingbracketposition,orientationor

locationinthearch)

________________________________________________

Introduction

Andrewsintroducedthepre-adjustededgewiseapplianceinthe1970sandrevolutionised

orthodontics(Andrews,1979).Thisreplacedtheedgewiseappliancewhereallbrackets

wereidenticalandtherewasgreatneedforwirebending(Johnson,2013).Andrews

introducedtipthroughslotangulationandtorquethroughslotinclination,alongwith“in-

out”throughbracketbasevariation(Thickett,Taylor,&Hodge,2007).

Modernbracketprescriptionsandtheirevolution

Theinceptionofthepre-adjustededgewiseappliancewashailedassignificant,reducing

wirebending,allowingforthemovementofgroupsofteethandthusshortertreatment

times,yetmoreconsistenttreatmentoutcomes(Thickettetal.,2007).Thisincreasedfocus

onprecisebracketplacement,andstraightwiresplacedmorestrainonanchorage(Singh,

2017).

Therehavebeenmanymodificationsintipandtorqueinpre-adjustededgewisesince

Andrews(Mittal,Thiruvenkatachari,Sandler,&Benson,2015).MBTandRotharethemost

commonlyusedtoday.

Andrews

Theoriginalstraightwireapplianceusedsiamesebracketsplacedonthefacialaxisofthe

clinicalcrownwithheavyforcestocontroltoothmovementinthreedimensions

(McLaughlin,Bennett,&Trevisi,2002;Mohammadi&Moslemzadeh,2011).

Prescriptionvaluestookaveragevaluesfrom120models(Andrews,1972,1979).Andrews’

prescriptionhaddifferentsetsforvariousmalocclusions,degreeofcrowdingand

extraction/non-extractioncases(Singh,2017),incorporatinganti-rotationandanti-tipinto

extractioncases(Andrews,1979).Thisresultedinalargenumberofbrackettypes.

Roth

Tominimiseheplethoraofbrackettypesandnecessaryinventory,Rothdevisedonesetof

bracketsapplicableformostcases,combiningAndrews’setCupperincisor,setSlower

incisors,minimumtranslationupperposteriorandlowercaninebrackets,andmaximum

translationuppercanineandlowerposterior(Thickettetal.,2007).Healsoincreasedtipto

assistcanineguidance,anddistalcrowntiptolowerbuccalsegmentsashisprescriptionwas

moreanchoragedemanding.Furthermore,uppermolartorqueincreasedtopreventpalatal

cuspdrop(McLaughlinetal.,2002;Singh,2017;Thickettetal.,2007).

MBT

DevisedbyMcLaughlin,BennettandTrevisiinthe1990s,thisprescriptionisbasedarounda

numberofprinciples.Bracketversatility,lightcontinuousforces,anchoragecontrol,group

movementofteethandasinglefinishingwirearekeyelementsoftheMBTtheory.

Accuratebracketplacementissignificant,andbracketplacementchartsweredevised

(Figure1)(McLaughlinetal.,2002).

Figure1:MBTbracketplacementcharts;from(McLaughlinetal.,2002)

MBTreducedanteriortipcomparedwithRothandAndrews.Itsaimwastoreducestrainon

molaranchorageandavoidin-treatmentarchlengthincrease(Thickettetal.,2007);

undertorquingteethrequiresspace,soforevery5°ofanteriorinclination,1mmofarch

lengthisgenerated,resultinginlackofstability(Badawi,Toogood,Carey,Heo,&Major,

2008;Fleming,DiBiase,Sarri,&Lee,2009).Increasedpalatalroottorquecounteracts

torquelossduringoverjetreductionandspaceclosureandlabialroottorqueincreasedto

limitlowerincisorproclineonlevelling.Furthermore,caninetipwasreducedtoupright

rootsandpreventcanineandpremolarrootproximity(Moesi,Dyer,&Benson,2013;

Thickettetal.,2007).

ThetipandtorquevaluesofAndrews,RothandMBTareillustratedinFigures2and3.

Figure2:Andrews/Roth/MBTtorquevalues;from(Thickettetal.,2007)

Figure3:Andrews/Roth/MBTtipvalues;from("Erratum,"2014)

Bracketvariationsfordifferentscenarios

Astheprescriptiononanindividualbracketisknown,variationscanbeemployedwhen

thereisalocaltoothpositioningproblemormissingtoothbychangingtheorientationor

usingabracketonatoothotherthantheoneforwhichitwasintended(Singh,2017;

Thickettetal.,2007).Inversionresultsinatorquechangebutnottip.Swappingtheright

andleftbracketschangesthetipvaluewithoutchangingtorque(Thickettetal.,2007).

Palatallyplacedlateralincisors

Thelateralincisorbracketwillnotsupplyenoughlabialroottorque.Inversionofthelateral

incisorbracketreversesslotinclination,graduallyintroducingtorquewiththewire

sequence,improvingcomfortovertheuseoftorqueingpliers(Singh,2017;Thickettetal.,

2007)

Appliedinpractice,ananAndrewsbrackethasa6°difference,Roth16°andMBT20°

(Figure4-6).

Figure4&5:Managementofpalatallyplacedlateralincisors;from(McLaughlinetal.,2002)

Figure6:clinicalpresentationofbracketforpalatallateralincisors;from(McLaughlinetal.,

2002)

Absentlateralincisors

Thecaninebracketisunsuitablewhenreplacingalateral,asitgivesgraterlabialroottorque

whenpalatalroottorqueisrequiredforlateralincisors–thecrownanatomiesofthetwo

teetharevastlydifferent.Alateralbracketwouldpositionthetoothpalatallyandthefitis

poor;afurtheroptionwouldbetorecontourthecanine,thenplacethebracket,although

thismayresultinpoortoothangulation.Asimplemeasureisinversionofthecanine

bracket,maintainingthebracketfitandin-out(Figure7).MBTandAndrewsgivespalatal

roottorquechangesby14degrees;tipvaluesforlateralsandcaninesinMBTareidentical,

withRoththereisasmalldifference(McLaughlinetal.,2002;Thickettetal.,2007).

Figure7:Positioningcaninebracketforabsentlateralincisor;from(McLaughlinetal.,2002)

Class3canineangulation

Whencamouflaging,theunderlyingmalocclusionisacceptedandincisorsarecompensated.

Toanglelowercaninesfavourably,thecontralateralcaninebracketscanbeswitchedto

encouragedistaltipandreduceanchoragerequirements(Figure8)(Singh,2017;Thickettet

al.,2007).Someclinicianspreferusingthecorrectbracket,angulatingitforcrowntipto

leavethepowerarmavailablebutthismaycauseapoorfittothetooth(Arun&Kallur,

2008).

Figure8:contralateralcaninebracketforclass3;from(Thickettetal.,2007)

Labialmovementofpalatalcanine

Palatalcaninemovementresultsincrownmovementwithouttheroot,causingunattractive

tip.Inordertoincreaselabialroottorque,thelowercontra-lateralcaninebracketcanbe

invertedtotheupper.ThisisrelevantinRothwherethereis9°change;inMBTthereare

similartorquevalues(Thickettetal.,2007).

Caninegingivalrecession

Incaseswherethegingivaehasrecededorthecanineisveryprominent,invertingthe

bracketgivespalatalroottorque,whichcanhelpreducefurtherrecession(McLaughlinet

al.,2002).

Absentuppercentralincisor

Inordertofacilitaterestorativetreatment,thepreferentialmesialrootmovementoverthe

crownshouldoccur.Bondingthecontralateralcentralincisorbrackettotiltthetooth

allowsthis(Figure9)(Thickettetal.,2007);however,somecliniciansprefercentringthe

lateralincisorinthespaceforrestorativepurposesclaimingthisimprovesforce

transmissionthroughtheroot(Arun&Kallur,2008)

Figure9:managementofmissingcentralincisor;from(Thickettetal.,2007)

Incisorsinclass3

Inclass3cases,thereisaneedforupperincisorproclination.Itispossibletoinvertincisor

bracketsforlabialroottorque,MBTgivingthegreatestchangeat34°(Thickettetal.,2007)

althoughthereareconcernsthatthisamountoftorquerisksrootresorption(Arun&Kallur,

2008).

Upperpremolarsubstitutingcanine

Incaseswherethecanineisabsentorreplacingthelateralincisor,placementofthebracket

moredistallyonthepremolarmovesthepalatalcuspoutoftheway(Singh,2017).

Smoothingthepalatalcuspofthefirstpremolarmayberequiredtofurtherhideitor

improveocclusalinterference.

Casefinishing

InordertoachievegoodfinishingandocclusioninMBTprescription,lowersecondmolar

tubescanbeusedonthecontralateralupperfirstandsecondmolarstoresultinzerotip

andzerorotation,resultinginmesio-palatalrotationofuppermolars,asshowninfigure10

(McLaughlinetal.,2002).

Figure10:casefinishingmolars,from(McLaughlinetal.,2002)

Doestheprescriptionmatter?

MoesietalandMittaletaldemonstratedthattherewasnodifferenceinsubjective

aestheticjudgementoranteriortoothangulationbetweenMBTandRothbracket

prescriptions,andsmallchangesintheprescriptiondonotmakeclinicallydetectableresults

(Kattner&Schneider,1993;Mittaletal.,2015;Moesietal.,2013).

Theconceptoftorsional(slot)playmustbeaddressed.Theengagementanglebetweenthe

bracketandwireisvariable,sosmallchangesinbracketsmaynotfullyexpressasthe

workingwireonlyengagesthebracketatfewpointsandfullprescriptionexpressionmay

neveroccur(Figure11)(Archambaultetal.,2010).

Figure11:theconceptoftorsionalplay;from(Johnson,2013)

Prescriptionexpressionisdependentontheworkingarchwireandthevariationin

engagement.Figure12showsincreasingthethicknessofarchwiresindifferentbracket

slotsdecreasestorsionalplay;achangeinarchwireisasimilardifferencetotheprescription

differenceindegreesbetweenRothandMBT(Archambaultetal.,2010;Badawietal.,2008;

Moesietal.,2013).Usingawiresequencethatgraduallyexpressestheprescriptionand

finishingcasesinthethickestwirepossibleisthereforeessential(Badawietal.,2008;Moesi

etal.,2013).Errorsinprescriptioncanalsostemfromimpropermachining(Cash,Good,

Curtis,&McDonald,2004).Inanattempttoexpressmoreofthedesiredvalues,high

torqueprescriptionshavebeenadvocated(Gioka&Eliades,2004).

Figure12:changeinwiresizeversusslop;from(Johnson,2013)

Conclusion

Cliniciansmustunderstandprescriptionstoachieveidealtoothposition.Evenwithpre-

adjustedappliances,achievingallsixkeysofocclusionisstilldifficult(Davies,Gray,Sandler,

&O'Brien,2001;Kattner&Schneider,1993).Thereisaneedforabracketinventoryto

includeavarietyofprescriptionsandtheknowledgetoapplythemindifferentscenariosfor

individualpatientneeds.Whilstthepre-adjustedapplianceiseconomicalandefficient,and

hasnodoubtrevolutionisedorthodontictreatment,itreliesheavilyonaccuracyofbracket

placement,andnosingleprescriptiontotallyeliminateswirebending.Theoutcomeof

orthodontictreatment,however,doesnotrelyontheprescriptionalone(Kattner&

Schneider,1993;Lotzof,Fine,&Cisneros,1996;Thickettetal.,2007).

References

Andrews,L.F.(1972).Thesixkeystonormalocclusion.AmJOrthod,62,296-309.

Andrews,L.F.(1979).Thestraight-wireappliance.BrJOrthod,6,125-143.

Archambault,A.,Lacoursiere,R.,Badawi,H.,Major,P.W.,Carey,J.,&Flores-Mir,C.(2010).

Torqueexpressioninstainlesssteelorthodonticbrackets.Asystematicreview.Angle

Orthod,80(1),201-210.doi:10.2319/080508-352.1

Arun,A.V.,&Kallur,R.(2008).Choosingapre-adjustedorthodonticapplianceprescription

foranteriorteeth.JOrthod,35(1),59;authorreply59-60.

doi:10.1179/146531207225022446

10.1179/jor.35.1.59

Badawi,H.M.,Toogood,R.W.,Carey,J.P.,Heo,G.,&Major,P.W.(2008).Torque

expressionofself-ligatingbrackets.AmJOrthodDentofacialOrthop,133(5),721-

728.doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.051

Cash,A.C.,Good,S.A.,Curtis,R.V.,&McDonald,F.(2004).Anevaluationofslotsizein

orthodonticbrackets-arestandardsasexpected?AngleOrthod,74(4),450-453.

Davies,S.J.,Gray,R.M.J.,Sandler,P.J.,&O'Brien,K.(2001).Orthodonticsandocclusion.Br

DentJ,191(10),539-549.

Erratum.(2014).JournalofOrthodontics,36(1),70-70.doi:10.1179/jor.2009.1.70

Fleming,P.S.,DiBiase,A.T.,Sarri,G.,&Lee,R.T.(2009).Comparisonofmandibulararch

changesduringalignmentandlevelingwith2preadjustededgewiseappliances.AmJ

OrthodDentofacialOrthop,136(3),340-347.doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.030

Gioka,C.,&Eliades,T.(2004).Materials-inducedvariationinthetorqueexpressionof

preadjustedappliances.AmericanJournalofOrthodonticsandDentofacial

Orthopedics,125(3),323-328.doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.02.007

Johnson,E.(2013).Selectingcustomtorqueprescriptionsforthestraight-wireappliance.

AmJOrthodDentofacialOrthop,143(4Suppl),S161-167.

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.09.003

Kattner,P.F.,&Schneider,B.J.(1993).Comparisonofrothapplianceandstandard

edgewiseappliancetreatmentresults.AmJOrthodDentofacOrthop,103(1),24-32.

Lotzof,L.P.,Fine,H.A.,&Cisneros,G.J.(1996).Canineretraction:Acomparisonoftwo

preadjustedbracketsystems.AmJOrthodDentofacOrthop,110,191-196.

McLaughlin,R.P.,Bennett,J.C.,&Trevisi,H.J.(2002).SystemisedOrthodonticTreatment

Mechanics.Mosby.

Mittal,M.,Thiruvenkatachari,B.,Sandler,P.J.,&Benson,P.E.(2015).Athree-dimensional

comparisonoftorqueachievedwithapreadjustededgewiseapplianceusingaRoth

orMBTprescription.AngleOrthod,85(2),292-297.doi:10.2319/122313-941

Moesi,B.,Dyer,F.,&Benson,P.E.(2013).RothversusMBT:doesbracketprescriptionhave

aneffectonthesubjectiveoutcomeofpre-adjustededgewisetreatment?EurJ

Orthod,35(2),236-243.

Mohammadi,A.,&Moslemzadeh,S.H.(2011).Comparisonoftheaccuracyofbracket

placementwithheightbracketpositioninggaugeandboonegauge.JDentResDent

ClinDentPros,5(4),111-118.

Singh,P.(2017).Fixedappliancesandbracketprescriptions.BPPLecture,May2017.

Thickett,E.,Taylor,N.G.,&Hodge,T.(2007).Choosingapre-adjustedorthodontic

applianceprescriptionforanteriorteeth.JOrthod,34(2),95-100.

doi:10.1179/146531207225021996