Prasad Saripalli, PNNL (PI) B. Peter McGrail, PNNL(Co-PI)

CHARACTERIZATION AND ALTERATION OF WETTABILITY STATES OF CHARACTERIZATION AND ALTERATION OF WETTABILITY STATES OF ALASKAN RESERVOIRS TO IMPROVE OIL RECOVERY EFFICIENCY ALASKAN RESERVOIRS TO IMPROVE OIL RECOVERY EFFICIENCY

Prasad Saripalli, PNNL (PI)B. Peter McGrail, PNNL(Co-PI)

Abhijit Y. Dandekar, UAF (PI)Shirish L. Patil, UAF (Co-PI) Santanu Khataniar, UAF (Co-PI) Shivkumar Patil (Graduate Student)

Patrick L. McGuire

OilOil

OUTLINEOUTLINEFocus on wettabilityExperiment DetailsPKS Data of CoresResultsConclusion/SummaryFuture workProgress

FOCUS ON WETTABILITYFOCUS ON WETTABILITY Relative distribution of fluids within the pore space of a

reservoir rock is controlled by wettability, i.e., influence on Sor or oil recovery

Residual oil saturation is controlled by a complex, poorly understood interaction involving water, oil, and mineral chemistry

Oil/Brine/Rock system Wettability is a function of numerous variables; prominent ones being fluid chemistry and rock type

USBM and Amott considered as industry standards; however they characterize average wettability and are inadequate for mixed wettability characterization

Experiments are being carried out to determine the secondary oil recovery potential of low salinity brine injection and the effect of wettability variation on Sor

Two sets of experiments were carried out

Experiment 1 Observing the effect of oil aging on wettability and consequently on Sor value of ANS cores.

EXPERIMENT DETAILSEXPERIMENT DETAILS


Experiment 2 Determine the secondary oil recovery potential of low salinity brine injection and the effect of wettability variation on Sor.

Test Materials for Experiment- Cores- 1.5” diameter, 0.8” length, Clean and Oil

Aged Alaska North Slope cores. Crude Oil- Alaska North Slope crude oil.

All brines were reconstituted in the lab using NaCl, NaHCO3, Na2SO4, KCl, CaCl2, SrCl2, MgCl2 and distilled water. High salinity brine = 22,000 TDS. Low salinity brine = 11,000 TDS and 5,500 TDS salinities respectively.


PRESSURE DROP PROFILE for kPRESSURE DROP PROFILE for kabsabs..

Permeability Measurement (Core A)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

I njected pore volume (ml)

dP

(p

sia

)

PKS DATA – ANS CORESPKS DATA – ANS CORES

Porosity of Cores

0.1989 0.19680.2078

0.3334

0.339

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

A B C D E

Core Name

Po

rosi

ty

Permeability of Cores

48.38

98.67

47.623.3

36.2

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

A B C D E

Core Name

Per

mea

bilit

y (m

D)

PKS DATA – ANS CORESPKS DATA – ANS CORES

Experiment 1 Experiment 2

Oil aged core sample New i.e. clean core sample

Water flooding Rates of 30 cc/hr.

Water flooding Rates of 30 cc/hr.

Overburden Pressure of 500 psi is used in all floods.

Overburden Pressure of 500 psi is used in all floods.

Flood temperature - Reservoir temperature.

Flood temperature - Reservoir temperature.


Preparation for Experiment 1

Connate water saturation (Swc) was established in the cores on which already high and low salinity waterflood tests had been carried out. (Core A, Core C, Core D)

Cores were oil aged for 21 days in an autoclave.

Reason behind aging- To observe the role of crude oil constituents on the salinity dependence of wettability and oil recovery


WATER FLOODING (C ore D,new core)

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0

Injected Brine (PV)

22000 T D S

11000 T D S

5500 T D S

RESULTSRESULTS

Quarter: Nov-Jan

RESULTS…RESULTS…continuedcontinued

0.4430.4543

0.41250.4317

0.4112

0.38

0.4

0.42

0.44

0.46

Sor

22000 TDS 11000 TDS 5500 TDS

Brine Salinity

Sor vs Brine Salinity (Core D)Before Aging After Aging

Quarter: Nov-Jan


I A-H Vs Brine Salinity (Core D)

0.28

0.2857 0.28

0.2593

0.26

0.24

0.25

0.26

0.27

0.28

0.29

22000 TDS 11000 TDS 5500 TDS

Brine Salinity

I A-H

Before Aging After Aging

Quarter: Nov-Jan


0.4259

0.4034

0.39

0.4

0.41

0.42

0.43

Sor

22000 TDS 11000 TDS

Brine Salinity

Sor vs Brine Salinity (Core E, New core) Quarter: Nov-Jan


I A-H vs Brine Salinity (Core E, New core)

0.3182

0.3077

0.3

0.305

0.31

0.315

0.32

22000 TDS 11000 TDS

Brine Salinity

I A-H

Quarter: Nov-Jan


0.44560.3959 0.4239

0.2033

0.4131

0.1986

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

Sor

22000 11000 5500

Brine Salinity (TDS)

Sor vs Brine salinity (Core A)

After Oil Aging Before Oil Aging

I A-H vs Brine salinity (Core A)

0.3810.36890.375

0.45450.450.44

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

22000 11000 5500

Brine salinity (TDS)

I A-H

After oil Aging Before oil Aging



0.3862

0.4738

0.2695

0.4565

0.253

0.45

0

0.05

0.10.15

0.2

0.250.3

0.350.4

0.45

0.5

Sor

22000 TDS 11000 TDS 5500 TDS

Brine Salinity

Sor Vs Brine Salinity (Core C)



I A-H vs Brine Salinity (Core C)

0.39

0.43

0.450.45

0.380.385

0.34

0.36

0.38

0.4

0.42

0.44

0.46

22000 TDS 11000 TDS 5500 TDS

Brine Salinity

I A-H



0.3959

0.2033 0.1986

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Sor

22000 TDS 11000 TDS 5500 TDS

Brine Salinity

Sor vs Brine Salinity (Core B, New Core)


I A-H vs Brine Salinity (Core B, New core)

0.35

0.36

0.38

0.33

0.34

0.35

0.36

0.37

0.38

0.39

22000 TDS 11000 TDS 5500 TDS

Brine Salinity

I A-H

CONCLUSIONS/SUMMARYCONCLUSIONS/SUMMARY• Low salinity waterfloods performed on core A,

B, C, D, E showed reduction in Sor with reduction in salinity.

• The injection of low salinity brine resulted in slight increase in the water-wetness of the

core samples.

CONCLUSIONS/SUMMARYCONCLUSIONS/SUMMARYEffect of oil aging: (Core A, C & D) Because of oil aging the wettability of core is decreased (in water wetting) compared to its previous wettability (wettability when cores were unaged) Increase in Sor value; however, with low salinity

brine injection Sor value reduced.

The wettability of original mineral surfaces can be altered by the adsorption of polar compounds

and/or the deposition of organic matter that was originally in the crude oil.

FUTURE WORKFUTURE WORK

Conducting coreflood experiments on oil aged core samples.

Core flooding studies at complete reservoir conditions with live oil are to be conducted.

PROGRESSPROGRESS

No cost extension upto 9/30/2007

THANK YOU!THANK YOU!

Documents

Prasad Saripalli, PNNL (PI) B. Peter McGrail, PNNL(Co-PI)