Practice and Concept of Multidimensioanl Poverty Analysis

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 Practice and Concept of Multidimensioanl Poverty Analysis

    1/5

    MULTIDIMENSIONAL POVERTY ANALYSIS

    APPROACH CONCEPT AND PRACTICE

    Multidimensional poverty analysis aimed at gaining an understanding of the local

    situation in its wider context, including social, economic, physical and financial

    aspects, unlike the other economic poverty analysis which tries to explain the

    situation on the context of economics direction leaving the other face of poverty.

    Consequently that approach makes poverty analysis a sided approach

    A useful literature was provided from the contributions of the following on

    multidimensional poverty. (Praag and Carbonell, 2005; Kamanou, 2005; Anup,

    2010; Foster, Greer and Thorbecke, 2010; Sabina and Foster, 2011; Rodrogo,

    2011; Alkaire and Foster, 2011a; Alkire and Foster 2011b; Hatzimasoura and

    Bennet, 2011; Gaston 2012). Their effort to justify the need for multidimensional

    poverty is clear. Most of them observed that poverty analysis is tilted on economic

    perspective while leaving other aspect. This is quite a complete movement away

    from traditional one-dimensional to multidimensional poverty measurement

    particularly with respect to the identification step.

    There were consensus that poverty depends on many variables not just income,

    expenditure or wealth. Longevity, low education poor health status, insecurity, low

    self confidence or powerlessness, absence of right such as freedom are the most

    obvious variable. Most of them if not all are ordinal variables in nature they are

    rank based on specific criteria. Also an Individual cannot be said is poor

    completely or not since He/ she can be poor in some dimension and not poor in

    another dimension. Hence it is good to measure poverty as degree or intensity of

    being in poverty rather than classifying them into poor and non poor. Even the

    most widely used model for income poverty analysis, the FGT (Foster Greer and

  • 7/27/2019 Practice and Concept of Multidimensioanl Poverty Analysis

    2/5

    Thorbike) which was developed 25 years ago now change perspective try to

    capture multidimensional poverty using ordinal variables. Generally the

    subjectivity of poverty depends on the individual, views, principles and feelings to

    the entire situation. The concept of Attitude Belief and Opinion had beenassessed in many behavioral research using either ordinal or Categorical

    measurement scales. The major problems with the ordinal and categorical variable

    is that most such data at first look researchers feel embarrassed, totally random

    difficult and inappropriate in most inferential data analysis. Recent advances in

    computer solve these problem now many classification, reduction and pattern,

    relationship detection software are available to which uses both ordinal and

    categorical variables objectively.

    Obviously, it is a clear fact those who are experiencing poverty usually have a

    perspective on the sources, forms, nature and intensities of their various

    deprivation and deficit that is entirely different from that of the analyst studying a

    particular indicator, especially absolute income or food poverty line. These insights

    remain silent and invisible. Notwithstanding the fact that the methodology of self

    perception based approaches to poverty identification and analysis is not without

    its own problems the relevance of such subjective information cannot be

    overlooked. Hence require a new insight into how to capture the perspective of the

    affected the way they experience it directly. This can be done through

    multidimensional approach to capture data. But must transform to reflect the way

    analysis can be possible. This transformation are done by Composite or latent

    variable measurement. This process is one of many methods of solving the

    voluminous nature of poverty indicators which were thought to be a problem

    before. Recent work tries to use the multidimensional indicators but reduced and

    transformed them in a form more liable to further analysis.

  • 7/27/2019 Practice and Concept of Multidimensioanl Poverty Analysis

    3/5

    Multidimensional poverty is complex interrelated problems and mostly two way

    dependency relationships exist, variable interacting between themselves. This

    makes multidimensional poverty analysis intricate task, therefore for ease of

    investigation some statistical applications had to be imploded. Pattern recognition,

    classification, examining relations are the common approach to multidimensional

    poverty analysis. The pattern recognition is the process of finding general relations

    in a set of data, and forms the core of many disciplines, from neural networks to

    so-called syntactical pattern recognition.

    Measurement of relationship and pattern detection in multidimensional poverty is

    done with multivariate analysis technique which comprise of factor analysis,

    principal component, multidimensional scaling, cluster analysis conjoint analysis,

    discriminant analysis, and correspondence analysis. These techniques prove

    beneficial in their application and solve, most of the problems experience using

    regression.

    None the less, the use of multivariate statistical technique in multidimensional

    poverty analysis increased significantly. Generally in multidimensional poverty

    analysis number of variables exhibit interrelationship between themselves hence

    the need for knowledge of the structure patterns of the variables. Factor,

    component, cluster analysis techniques were suitable for analyzing the patterns of

    complex, multidimensional relationship encountered in research. They can be

    utilized to examine the underlying pattern or relationship for large number of

    variables and to determine whether information can be condense or summarized,

    classified, grouped, or segregate into a smaller set of factors or components. Karl

  • 7/27/2019 Practice and Concept of Multidimensioanl Poverty Analysis

    4/5

    and Irini, 2001; Koutsyiannis, 2001; Manly, 2005 Ken, 2006; Bengt and Tihomir,

    2011; all suggested principal component or factor analysis for data reduction

    without losing the essential features of the indicators as well as capturing ordinal,

    categorical, and converting them to metric variables usable for analysis. The

    approach helps to avoid multicolinearity problem, identification and simultaneous

    equation bias and the effect of aggregation problem common to many macro

    economics problem.

    But multiple correspondence analysis approach was used to measure

    multidimensional poverty by Herve, 2007; Assellin (2009) in Senegal;

    Abdeljaouad and Paolo (2012) in Morocco. The method is comprehensive

    embracing every aspect of human life at the same time transforming and serving

    the objective of data reduction, pattern recognition and relationship exploration.

    The multiple correspondence analyses were principally used for data that were

    categorical or nominal unlike the factorial and principal component method whichuses both. Although Rencher (2002); Landau(2004), Hair (2010), all believe that

    principal component and factor analysis are good in data reduction for both metric

    or non metric data

    In Multidimensional poverty it is common to encountered situations that can best

    resolve by defining groups of homogenous variables, or individuals suffering from

    poverty, their level or even their behaviors. The ultimate strategic options based to

    identifying groups within the populations such as segmentation and classification

    would not be possible without an objective methodology. Cluster analysis is the

    best approach to perform such. The techniques of cluster analysis have been

  • 7/27/2019 Practice and Concept of Multidimensioanl Poverty Analysis

    5/5

    extensively applied to data in many fields, such as medicine, psychiatry, sociology,

    criminology, anthropology, archaeology, geology, geography, remote sensing,

    market research, economics, taxonomy of plant and animal, soil classification and

    engineering. The method use in searching for natural structure among the

    observation based on multivariate profile. Cluster analysis group individuals or

    objects into clusters so that objects in the same cluster are more similar to one

    another than they are to objects in other cluster. The attempt is to maximize the

    homogeneity of the objects within the cluster while also maximizing the

    heterogeneity between the clusters. Therefore this work will used the approach in

    searching for groups and classes of multidimensional poverty in the area as one ofthe analytical tools.