IT부서의 과제

기하급수적으로 늘어나는 수천 대의 x86서버의 관리가 잘 되고 있는지 잘 모르겠다

매년 장비는 엄청나게 늘어나지만, 운영 인력의 증가는 없어야 한다

IT장비 구성 변경을 위해서 주말마다/야간마다 팀원들이 현장에서 작업을 해서 불만이 많다

X86서버와 스토리지 장비가 급격하게 늘어나면서 상면이 부족해서 고민이다

“내가 원하는 조건으로, 원하는 성능을 얻고 싶다＂

“사용하다 보니 클라우드 비용이 너무 높다＂

“기술지원, 운영이 원하는 수준으로 이루어지지 않는다＂

“보안/데이터 보유에 대한 통제권을 가지면서 Risk를

최소화 하고 싶다＂

Issues in public cloud

컨테이너는 어플리케이션 플랫폼으로서 주류가 되고 있음컨테이너 기반 어플리케이션 배포 및 운영 사례가 빠르게 증가하고 있음

“….we've seen a quadrupling of container customers, accompanied by a doubling of container consumption in just the first months of 2016 alone. Of that data, more than twenty-five percent are Fortune 500 enterprises ….”

Mark Russinovich CTO

The "lift and shift" containerization of existing traditional applications represents 80% of enterprise use cases.VM hosting from 2016 to 2020: 80%+ of new enterprise containers will be hosted on VMs.

The biggest challenges to container deployment include persistent storage, networking, security and data management.The leading reason for not adopting containers is that not enough is yet known about container technologies in order to justify investment.

Oracle 19%

48%

35%

9%

36%

47%

10%

21%

83%

Microsoft Exchange

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SharePoint

Sap

VDI

Industry-specific applications*

E-Commerce

Other

*e.g. 911 system, healthcare application, legal case management, CAD/CAM, etc.Source: TechValidate, IDC, and internal research

>1/3 with

>100:1 Data Efficiency

1/2 see

>50%Performance

Improvements

HCI Workloads

Majority of customers run

>75% of virtualized workloads on HPE SimpliVity

Production workloads running on HPE SimpliVity

Which application types are you running or planning to run on HPE SimpliVity?

HPE SimpliVity enables dramatic efficiencySince deploying HPE SimpliVity, what efficiency benefits have you realized or what do you expect to realize regarding IO and capacity savings?

HPE SimpliVity provides dramatic application performance improvementsSince deploying HPE SimpliVity, how much have you improved or do you expect to improve performance?

Greater than 300:1–5%

200:1 to 300:1–10%

100:1 to 200:1–20%

50:1 to 100:1–28%

Up to 50:1–38%