Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Practical Applications of Raman Spectroscopy for Process AnalysisSpectroscopy for Process Analysis
Brian J. Marquardt & Bernd Wittgens**, Charles Branham and David J. Veltkamp
Center for Process Analytical ChemistryCenter for Process Analytical ChemistryUniversity of Washington
** Sintef, Trondheim, Norway
Absorption systemCO2 to sequestrationClean Flue gas
Sweet natural gas Leanamine
DesorptionAbsortioncolumn
pcolumn
Reboiler
Flue gasRaw natural gas Loaded
amine
R A l i f G /Li idRaman Analysis of Gas/Liquid Reactor at Elevated PressureReactor at Elevated Pressure
Evaluate Raman as an online tool for evaluatingEvaluate Raman as an online tool for evaluating gas scrubber absorbent performance Experiments were performed in a gas/liquid reactor at elevated pressuresreactor at elevated pressuresEfficient and reproducible sampling was needed to interrogate both the liquid and gas phases of h ithe reaction
Reaction of Methyl Ethanolamine y(MEA) and CO2
MEA + CO2 + H2O HCO3- + MEAH+ColdHot
1000010000
8000
10000
8000
10000
(cou
nts)
4000
6000
4000
6000
Inte
nsity
(
2000
4000
2000
4000
0500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
0500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Raman Shift (cm-1)
Why is this reaction important?Environmental implications of CO2 release from the burning of fossil fuelsNeed for efficient chemical processing to effectivelyNeed for efficient chemical processing to effectively reduce excess stack emissions into the environmentRemoval of C02 from natural gas
Raman could be a useful tool for monitoring the absorption of C02 and absorbent performance in real-time for process controlfor process controlCan Raman be an effective sensor for monitoring both gas emission (CO2, SO2, …) and absorbent quality/capacity simultaneously in a wet scrubber toquality/capacity simultaneously in a wet scrubber to improve efficiency and control?
Experimental 785 nm Raman System
Ballprobe connected inline with high pressure fittingLaser power = 160 mW at sample -50º C detector tempLaser power = 160 mW at sample, 50 C detector temp.Exposure time 6 sec, 5 accums./spectrum (30 sec/spectrum)
Charge reactor with 20 mL of absorbent and H2OMethyl ethanolamine (MEA)Methyl ethanolamine (MEA)Methyl diethanolamine (MDEA)
Bubble CO2 gas at pressure through absorbent while collecting Raman datacollecting Raman data
Pressure range 5 – 60 psi CO2
Monitor reaction with Raman to determine absorbent CO2 saturation point at a given partial pressure of CO2CO2 saturation point at a given partial pressure of CO2
Gas/Liquid Reactor Setup
Raman Sampling Probe
Reactant Stds: Raman Spectra
10000
12000
10000
12000
• Water• Methyl Ethanolamine
80008000
• Methyl Diethanolamine
(cou
nts)
4000
6000
4000
6000
Inte
nsity
(
20002000
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Raman Shift (cm-1)
Reactant Raman Spectra
• 70% Water - 30% MEA• 70% Water - 22% MEA – 8% MDEA
3000300070% Water 22% MEA 8% MDEA
(cou
nts)
20002000
Inte
nsity
10001000
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Raman Shift (cm-1)
Gas/Liquid Reactor Setup
CO2 and H2O Raman Spectrum
40004000
1000
1100
1000
1100
ROI of Dissolved CO2
30003000
(cou
nts)
700
800
900
700
800
900
20002000
Inte
nsity
500
600
1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450
500
600
1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450
1382
10001000
• 12 PSI• 32 PSI
0
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
0
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
• 60 PSI
Raman Shift (cm-1)
1274
MEA Water and COMEA, Water and CO2 - Challenge: Comparison of standards to reaction
10000
12000
10000
12000
• water• MEA
(cou
nts)
80008000Time• 2.5• 10
Inte
nsity
4000
6000
4000
6000 • 30• 50
20002000
Raman Shift (cm-1)
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Sapphire
MEA Water and COMEA, Water and CO2 - Pressure step 10,32 and 58 psi
6000
7000
6000
7000
• 0 psi• 10 psi• 32 psi 2
2.2
2.4x 105 PCA Analysis of ROI
4000
5000
4000
5000
• 32 psi• 58 psi• 58 psi (no flow)
(cou
nts)
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Rel
ativ
e In
tens
ity2000
3000
2000
3000
Inte
nsity
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000.6
0.8
1
x-axis (unk.)
10001000
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Raman Shift (cm-1)
CO2 and MEA at 30 psi
60006000
Time (min)• 2.5• 10 2
2.2x 105 PCA Analysis of ROI
4000
5000
4000
5000
• 17• 25• 33• 40(c
ount
s)
1.4
1.6
1.8
Rel
ativ
e In
tens
ity2000
3000
2000
3000
• 40• 47• 55
Inte
nsity
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200.8
1
1.2
x-axis (unk.)
0
1000
0
1000
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Raman Shift (cm-1)
CO2, MEA and MDEA at 30 psi
0.05
0.1
Time (min)• 2.5• 10
PCA Analysis of ROI50005000
0 15
-0.1
-0.05
0
arb.
uni
ts
• 17• 25• 33• 40(c
ount
s)
3000
4000
3000
4000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160-0.25
-0.2
-0.15
x-axis (unk.)
• 40• 47• 55• 73In
tens
ity
20002000
10001000
Raman Shift (cm-1)
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Summary
Initial experiments indicate that Raman is an effective analysis tool for following these CO2absorption reactionsabsorption reactionsMore experiments need to be performed to evaluate and modify the reactor to ensure good gas mixing with the liquid absorbentwith the liquid absorbent
Problems with foaming and liquid evacuating the cellBy optimizing the reactor system it should improve the reproducibility of both the reaction and the p odu b y o bo a o a doptical sampling and lead to more consistent resultsA successful demonstration of Raman applied to a liquid/gas reactor to improve process control of a q /g p preaction at moderate pressure
Work in progress
Designed single test reactor (3rd generation)“Miniaturized” reactor for improved gas liquid contactOptimize gas/liquid separationOptimize gas/liquid separation
Design and application is under patentingTest of new absorber commence in autumn 2008
Conditions: < 1700 PsiConditions: < 1700 PsiTemperature: < 200 C
Improve instrumentation for process monitoringPressure temperature and flowPressure, temperature and flowABB FT-IRRaman