Pquete Habana and the Lola_Summary

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/24/2019 Pquete Habana and the Lola_Summary

    1/1

    ThePaqueteHabana

    Citation.175U.S.677(1900)

    Brief

    Fact

    Summary.TheargumentofthefishermenwhosevesselswasseizedbytheU.S

    (P)officialswasthatinternationallawexemptedcoastalfishermenfromcaptureasprizes

    ofwar.

    Synopsis

    of

    Rule

    of

    Law. Theargumentofthefishermenwhosevesselswasseizedbythe

    U.S(P)officialswasthatinternationallawexemptedcoastalfishermenfromcaptureas

    prizesofwar.

    Facts. Thisappealofa districtcourtdecree,whichcondemnedtwofishingvesselsandtheir

    cargoesasprizesofwar,wasbroughtbytheowners(D)oftwoseparatefishingvessels.

    EachofthevesselrunninginandoutofHavanaandsailingundertheSpanishflagwasa

    fishingsmackwhichregularlyengagedinfishingonthecoastofCuba.Insidethevesselswerefreshfishwhichthecrewhadcaught.

    Theownersofthevesselswerenotawareoftheexistenceofa waruntiltheywerestopped

    byU.S.(P)squadron.Noincriminatingmateriallikearmswerefoundonthefishermenand

    theydidnotmakeanyattempttoruntheblockadeafterlearningofitsexistencenotdid

    theyresisttheirarrest.Whentheowners(D)appealed,theyarguedthatbothcustomary

    internationallawandwritingsofleadinginternationalscholarsrecognizedanexemption

    fromseizureatwartimeofcoastalfishingvessels.

    Issue.

    Are

    coastal

    fishing

    vessels

    with

    their

    cargoes

    and

    crews

    excluded

    from

    prizes

    of

    war?

    Held.(Gray,J.).Yes.Coastalfishingvesselswiththeircargoesandcrewsareexcludedfrom

    prizesofwar.Thedoctrinethatexemptscoastalfishermenwiththeirvesselsandcrews

    fromcaptureasprizesofwarhasbeenknownbytheU.S.(P)fromthetimeoftheWarof

    IndependenceandhasbeenrecognizedexplicitlybytheFrenchandBritishgovernments.It

    isanestablishedruleofinternationallawthatcoastalfishingvesselswiththeirequipment

    andsupplies,cargoesandcrews,unarmedandhonestlypursuingtheirpeacefulcallingof

    catchingandbringinginfishareexemptfromcaptureasprizesofwar.Reversed.

    Discussion.ChiefJusticeFullerwhohada dissentingopinionwhichwasnotpublishedin

    thiscasebookarguedthatthecapturedvesselswereofsucha sizeandrangeastonotfall

    withintheexemption.Hefurtherarguedthattheexemptioninanycasehadnotbecomea

    customaryruleofinternationallaw,butwasonlyanactofgracethathadnotbeen

    authorizedbythePresident.