27
1 End Effector Selection and Design End Effector Types General Design Practices Specific Design Criteria Case Studies

Ppt End Effector Design

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Ppt End Effector Design

1

End Effector Selection and Design

• End Effector Types

• General Design Practices

• Specific Design Criteria

• Case Studies

Page 2: Ppt End Effector Design

2

End Effector Types

• Mechanical Grippers

• Negative Pressure (vacuum)

• Magnetic

• Hooks

• Ladles (scoops liquid or powder)

• Others (electrostatic)

Page 3: Ppt End Effector Design

3

End Effector Types- Mechanical Grippers

• Parallel Grippers

– Most common

– More accurate

Page 4: Ppt End Effector Design

4

End Effector Types- Mechanical Grippers

• Parallel Grippers

– Most common

– More accurate

• Angular Gripper

– Limited space

– Clearance

• Toggle Gripper

– High mechanical

advantage

– Over centering

Page 5: Ppt End Effector Design

5

End Effector Types- Mechanical Grippers

• External Grippers

• Internal Grippers

Page 6: Ppt End Effector Design

6

• Vacuum

– Suction Cups

– Edge grip

– Specialty

End Effector Types- Negative Pressure

Flat

Shaped

Bellows

Rough

Surfaces

Page 7: Ppt End Effector Design

7

• Vacuum

• Bernoulli (non-contact)

End Effector Types- Negative Pressure

Page 8: Ppt End Effector Design

8

• Vacuum

• Bernoulli

• Coanda (high flow, low pressure)

End Effector Types- Negative Pressure

Page 9: Ppt End Effector Design

9

• Vacuum

• Bernoulli

• Coanda (high flow, low pressure)

• Specialty

– Vacuum/pressure (Coreflow)

– Vacuum/ultrasonic (Zimmerman-Schlip)

End Effector Types- Negative Pressure

Page 10: Ppt End Effector Design

10

General Design Practices

• Minimize weight- affects robot performance– Material selection

– Lightening holes

• Minimize size– Helps minimize weight

– Reduce cantilever load and moment of inertia

– May conflict with flexibility

• Maximize rigidity– Improves positional accuracy and repeatability

– Reduce vibrations

• Maximize holding force– Reliably hold part (without damage)

– Orient part to maximize force in direction of motion

• Maintenance and form factor change considerations

Page 11: Ppt End Effector Design

11

Specific Design Criteria

• Work piece analysis (objects to be handled)

• Process Analysis

• Design Considerations

Page 12: Ppt End Effector Design

12

Work Piece Analysis

• Work piece Dimensions and tolerances

– Determines size and weight of end effector

• Material, stiffness, cost

– Can single tool handle size and shape variation of work piece?

– Is compliance required?

• PV Wafer stack not parallel due to wedge shape of wafers

Page 13: Ppt End Effector Design

13

Work Piece Analysis

• Material and physical properties– Use gripper, vacuum or magnet?

– Permissible contact points• Semiconductor: 3mm exclusion zone

• Hard disk: ID clamp zone, OD chamfer

• PV wafers: contact top surface but minimal edge contact

– Permissible grip forces• High force on PV wafer surface creates micro-cracks

• Need to control force and clamping speed?

– Weight and balance of part• Quantity and location of grip points

– Surface finish and shape• Vacuum for smooth flat surfaces, mechanical gripper for round parts

• Surface texture and condition (oily, sticky)

Page 14: Ppt End Effector Design

14

Process Analysis

• Manual or automated– Take tool to part or part to tool?

• Range and quantity of parts– Hard disk tools require multiple form factors (48, 65, 78, 84, 95mm)

– Automated or manual tool change

• Presentation and disposition– Position and orientation at pickup and drop-off

– Dimensional clearances to avoid interferences

Page 15: Ppt End Effector Design

15

Process Analysis

• Sequence of events and cycle time requirements– Number of end effectors

– batch processing

• Environment– Cleanliness

– Temperature (environment or workpiece)

– Atmospheric or Vacuum

– Chemicals

– Vibration and shock

• In process inspection requirements– Add gauging to end effector

– Compatibility with inspection process

Page 16: Ppt End Effector Design

16

Design Considerations

• Cost

• Flexibility

• Changeover

• Safety (lost of power, collision)

• Handling of damage product

• Sensing

– Part sensing

Page 17: Ppt End Effector Design

Case Studies

Page 18: Ppt End Effector Design

18

Case Studies

• Vacuum end effector- Hot wafers

• Bonded wafers

• Picking wafer from blind pocket

• PV cell handling- high speed

• PV cell handling- perforated wafers

Page 19: Ppt End Effector Design

19

Hot Wafers- Vacuum End Effector

• Problem: How to pick up a hot wafer with a cold vacuum end effector?– Wafer deforms (warps) due to temperature gradient and breaks vacuum.

• Solution: a paddle type end effector with a low thermal mass insert made from low thermal conductivity material.

Page 20: Ppt End Effector Design

20

Hot Wafers- vacuum end effector

Quartz

Insert

O-ring

Spring

Page 21: Ppt End Effector Design

21

Warped Wafers- vacuum end effector

• Problem: Bonded wafers are often deformed (warped or bowed).– Edges are sharp and brittle and can not be handled with edge grip end

effectors

– Will not hold vacuum with rigid vacuum pads

• Solution: compliant vacuum pads

Page 22: Ppt End Effector Design

22

Warped Wafers- vacuum end effector

Vacuum

pads

Pad snaps onto a ball

shaped receptor and

“rocks” +/-1deg

Page 23: Ppt End Effector Design

23

Top Surface, Non-contact Pick-up

• Problem: How to pick up a wafer from a blind pocket- without touching top surface

• Vacuum will not work

• Solution:

• Bernoulli gripper creates low pressure for pickup

• Edge support prevents contact with wafer surface

Page 24: Ppt End Effector Design

24

Top Surface, Non-contact Pick-up

Bernoulli

gripper

housing

Wafer contacts housing

only at the edge

Page 25: Ppt End Effector Design

25

PV wafer handling

• Problem: How to pick up and drop off PV wafers at 3600pph without damage

– Off flat belt

– Off stationary coinstack

– Cycle time is limited by pickup and dropoff- not robot speed

• Solution:

– High flow low vacuum, generate at point of use

• Rapid pickup, low stress on wafer

– Built-in blowoff for quick release of wafer

– Rigid, large contact surface for high holding force with non-marking wafer support

Page 26: Ppt End Effector Design

26

PV wafer handling

• Videos

– High speed pickup and dropoff

– Slow motion of pickup and dropoff

– 7200pph (for alternative subtrate)

Page 27: Ppt End Effector Design

27

PV wafer handling- Fragile

• Problem: Pick up highly fragile partially perforated wafers off coinstack.– Wafers stick together through

surface tension

– Vacuum applied on top wafer leaks through and holds on to wafers below

• Solution:– Add blowoff nozzle to separate

cells

– Change vacuum pattern with compliant seal in non-perforated cell area