PPM 641A2Sample1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 PPM 641A2Sample1

    1/12

    1

  • 8/9/2019 PPM 641A2Sample1

    2/12

    Program and Portfolio Management Assignment 2: Part B

    2.0 Governance problems and recommendation

    According to PMI (project Management Institute, 2012), program governance is the process

    of developing, communicating, executing, monitoring, and assuring the regulation, principles,

    organiational structures, practices and procedures associated !ith a proposed program" A

    proper and !ell#designed governance frame!or$ is essential for efficient and effective

    project decision#ma$ing (%arland, 200&)"

    An investigation on the Arena project reveals several governance pro'lems that create a lac$

    of oversight leading to project dela and cost overruns and project dela" hese pro'lems and

    recommendations for improvement associated !ith the Arena project are discussed as

  • 8/9/2019 PPM 641A2Sample1

    3/12

    scope" -or the Arena, the potential agencies are the A ports 4entre rust,

    /epartment of port and 5ecreation, A ourism 4ommission, and /epartment of

    4ulture and the Arts" 3ither of these agencies could 'e appointed as the client agenc

    rather than leaving / to ta$e full responsi'ilit for client agenc role, as !ell as

    deliver"

    A proper project steering committee should 'e formed to provide strategic oversight

    and drive the project"

    he ris$s at each stages should have 'een identified and managed accordingl

    2.! Problem 2 (Poor estimate of cost and time)

    he original cost estimate and opening date !ere 'ased on insufficient scoping and

    planning !ithout sstematic or sufficient analsis

    3xternal scrutin or legal advice !as not sought in ma$ing the decision

    /uring the contract negotiation, major changes to the Arena design !ere made

    !ithout ta$ing into account of its impact on project cost and schedule

    / underestimated the ris$ and agreed to 'ear the responsi'ilit of cost increase

  • 8/9/2019 PPM 641A2Sample1

    4/12

    Perform a preconstruction planning of project tas$s and resources needs and effective

    site management should 'e in place

    Project management soft!are (for example 8 Microsoft Project, Montecarlo

    simulation) might 'e used as an option to assist !ith 'udgeting and scheduling

    he project should 'e funded onl !hen the scope is !ell defined and estimated

    'udget and schedule are realistic

    2.# Problem ! (Poor comm$nication and record %eeping)

    he Minister for ousing and or$s or 4a'inet !ere not full informed the $e

    information such as contract negotiation, pricing uncertainties etc"

    / and 6P did not document (neither electronic or hard cop) and provide an

    !ritten record of the $e issues and ris$s involved

    he poor record $eeping on the project contravened the tate 5ecords Act 2000 and

  • 8/9/2019 PPM 641A2Sample1

    5/12

    (Word count - 701 words)

  • 8/9/2019 PPM 641A2Sample1

    6/12

    # /epartment of ousing and or$s (/)

    # /epartment of reasur and -inance (/-)

    # 6ffice of trategic Projects (6P)# 9%4 4onstruction (9%4)

    # A ports 4entre rust (

  • 8/9/2019 PPM 641A2Sample1

    7/12

    the impact of that interest can 'e ranged from ver high to ver lo!"

    he sta$eholders7 interest can 'e due to multiple factors depending on their position or

    relation to the project" In the Arena case, / and /- are investigated to have high

    interest due to their mission relevanc, economic interest and legal right"

    !.! +nfl$ence

    / and /- possess political po!er as !ell as position po!er in the project, !hich ma$es

    these agencies suscepti'le to have high influence over the project" According to ?u$l (1&&@),

    position po!er derives from either statutor or organiational authorit and contri'utes to

    have control over the information, phsical and social environment, re!ards and penalties

    associated !ith the project !hereas political po!er relates to control over decision processes

    and institutionaliation"

  • 8/9/2019 PPM 641A2Sample1

    8/12

    4ontri'utes to

    et!or$ connection

    Influences

    Figure 1 Influence mapping (Modified from Bourne and Walker !00")

    !." ,istance

    Application of the sta$eholder circle model discussed in the 9ourne and al$er article, it is

    apparent that the positions of 'oth / and /- agencies are close to the center of the

    circle that have pivotal impact on the project success" / forms influential sta$eholder

    close to the project and /- can 'e regarded as one of the sta$eholders of significant

    influence"

  • 8/9/2019 PPM 641A2Sample1

    9/12

    DHW

    D#"

  • 8/9/2019 PPM 641A2Sample1

    10/12

    (Word count %&' words)

  • 8/9/2019 PPM 641A2Sample1

    11/12

    Project Management Institute"A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge

    (PMBK Guide!" e!to!n .uare, Pa* Project Management Institute, 200F"

    estern Australia" 6ffice of the Auditor %eneral" "he Planning and Management of Perth

    Arena" est Perth, "A"* 6ffice of the Auditor %eneral for estern Australia, 2010"

    ood, /avid A" D5is$ imulation echni.ues to Aid Project 4ost#ime Planning and

    Management"D#is$ Management(2002)* doi*10"10>Epalgrave"rm"@2F010@"

    ?ang, I#ung" DImpact of 9udget Bncertaint on Project ime#4ost radeoff"D%EEE

    "ransactions on Engineering Management(200>)* doi*10"110&E3M"200>"@F"

  • 8/9/2019 PPM 641A2Sample1

    12/12