Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IDA Industrial Estate
Cork Road
Waterford
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2016
PPI Adhesive Products Limited Project Reference: 60518344
Issue 2 Final
17 January 2017
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:26
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Project Reference: 60518344
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Ppi Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 Ppi Gwmon 2016\Dms\Reports\60518344 Ppi Groundwater Monitoring 2016 Issue 2 Final.Docx
AECOM
Quality information
Prepared by Checked by Approved by
Edel O'Hannelly Principal Hydrogeologist
Kevin Forde Technical Director
Kevin Forde Technical Director
Revision History
Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position
0 07 January 2017 Original issue, draft Kevin Forde Technical Director
1 17 January 2017 Final issue Kevin Forde Technical Director
Distribution List
# Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name
0 1 Martin Murphy, PPI Adhesive Products Limited
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:26
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Project Reference: 60518344
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Ppi Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 Ppi Gwmon 2016\Dms\Reports\60518344 Ppi Groundwater Monitoring 2016 Issue 2 Final.Docx
AECOM
Prepared for:
PPI Adhesive Products Limited
IDA Industrial Estate
Cork Road
Waterford
Prepared by:
Edel O'Hannelly
Principal Hydrogeologist
T: 021 436 5006
M: 087 288 7392
AECOM Professional Services Ireland
Douglas Business Centre
Carrigaline Road
Cork
Ireland
T: +353 21 4365006
aecom.com
© 2017 AECOM Ireland Limited. All Rights Reserved.
This document has been prepared by AECOM Ireland Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client
(the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and
the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third
parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise
expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and
express written agreement of AECOM.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:26
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Project Reference: 60518344
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Ppi Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 Ppi Gwmon 2016\Dms\Reports\60518344 Ppi Groundwater Monitoring 2016 Issue 2 Final.Docx
AECOM
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 6
1.1 General Introduction ........................................................................................................... 6
1.2 Background ......................................................................................................................... 6
1.3 Objectives ........................................................................................................................... 6
1.4 Scope of Work .................................................................................................................... 6
2. Site Setting and History ................................................................................................................ 7
2.1 Site Description................................................................................................................... 7
2.2 Site Geology ....................................................................................................................... 7
2.3 Hydrology ............................................................................................................................ 7
2.4 Hydrogeology ...................................................................................................................... 7
2.5 Groundwater Monitoring Well Network ............................................................................... 8
2.6 Groundwater Monitoring and DQRA................................................................................... 8
3. FIELD METHOD AND OBSERVATIONS ...................................................................................... 9
3.1 Dip Round ........................................................................................................................... 9
3.2 Groundwater Sampling ..................................................................................................... 10
3.3 Water Quality Measurements ........................................................................................... 10
3.4 Observations ..................................................................................................................... 11
4. LABORATORY ANALYSIS .......................................................................................................... 11
4.1 Analytical Schedule .......................................................................................................... 11
4.2 Assessment Criteria ......................................................................................................... 11
4.3 VOCs ................................................................................................................................ 12
4.4 Redox and Biodegradation Indicators .............................................................................. 13
4.5 TPH ................................................................................................................................... 13
5. DISCUSSION AND UPDATED CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL................................................... 14
5.1 5.1 Chlorinated Hydrocarbons .......................................................................................... 14
5.2 Fuel Hydrocarbons ........................................................................................................... 15
6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................... 16
6.1 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... 16
6.2 Recommendations ............................................................................................................ 17
Figures
Tables
Appendix A Laboratory Certificates
Figures
Figure 1 – Site Location Plan
Figure 2 – Neighbouring Businessess in IDA Industrial Estate
Figure 3 – Shallow Borehole Location Plan
Figure 4 – Bedrock Monitoring Well Locations
Figure 5 – Shallow Borehole Elevations 2016
Figure 6 – Bedrock Contours September 2016
Figure 7 – PPI On-Site Bedrock Aquifer Monitoring Wells
Figure 8 – Conceptual Site Model
Figure 9 – Bedrock Aquifer Monitoring Wells Across Industrial Estate
Figure 10 – Site Layout Showing Fuel Storage Location
Figure 11 – Detected VOC Composition
Figure 12 – MW20 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Figure 13 – MW16 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Figure 14 – MW17 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Figure 15 – PPI Well - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Figure 16 – 404 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:26
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Project Reference: 60518344
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Ppi Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 Ppi Gwmon 2016\Dms\Reports\60518344 Ppi Groundwater Monitoring 2016 Issue 2 Final.Docx
AECOM
Figure 17 – 504 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Figure 18 – 505 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Figure 19 – Concentration vs Distance
Figure 20 – Concentration vs Time Degradation Rate
Tables
Table 1 – Sample Inventory 2016
Table 2 – Well Co-Ordinates and Depth Measurements - 19 September 2016
Table 3 – Water Quality Field Parameters – 2016
Table 4 – Bedrock Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Results (µg/L) 2016
Table 5 – Redox and Biodegradation Indicator Results (mg/L) 2016
Table 6 – TPH Results (µg/L) 2016
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:26
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Project Reference: 60518344
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Ppi Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 Ppi Gwmon 2016\Dms\Reports\60518344 Ppi Groundwater Monitoring 2016 Issue 2 Final.Docx
AECOM 6
1. Introduction
1.1 General Introduction
AECOM Ireland Limited (AECOM) is pleased to present this report to PPI Adhesive Products Limited
(PPI) detailing groundwater monitoring undertaken in September and November 2016 at the IDA
Industrial Estate, Cork Road Waterford. This report has been prepared in accordance with AECOM
proposal reference OPP-544131, dated 02 September 2016; and authorised by PPI under purchase
order number NM 016014.
The AECOM team for 2016 comprised the following:
• Project Director: Kevin Forde
• Project Manager: Edel O’Hannelly
• Field Scientist: Colin Fitzgerald
Laboratory analysis of samples was subcontracted to Exova Jones Environmental Ltd., Deeside, UK.
The laboratory certificates are attached in Appendix A.
1.2 Background
The PPI facility operates under the terms of an Integrated Pollution and Control (IPC) licence issued
by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (IPC licence P0093-01 issued in May 1997).
The site is required by the EPA to complete groundwater monitoring on an annual basis from selected
groundwater monitoring wells located on site and across the industrial estate. Annual monitoring is
focussed on the presence of chlorinated hydrocarbons in groundwater and parameters indicative of
natural attenuation processes. Up to 1991, trichloroethene (TCE) a chlorinated hydrocarbon and
volatile organic compound (VOC) was used in the production process on site. Since the mid-1990s
TCE and compounds related to its biodegradation, in addition to other VOCs, have been detected in
groundwater from beneath the site.
Annual monitoring completed in 2014 detected separate-phase fuel hydrocarbons in one monitoring
well. In June 2015, the EPA requested (EPA request for information RI003936) that groundwater from
wells on-site and off-site down-gradient wells, be sampled and analysed for fuel hydrocarbons. This
was completed in 2015 and sampling of groundwater from selected wells for fuel hydrocarbons has
also been included in the 2016 groundwater monitoring ground.
This report presents results for the annual groundwater monitoring undertaken in 2016.
1.3 Objectives
The primary objective was to comply with the site’s annual groundwater monitoring requirements
under P0093-01 and EPA request for information RI003936. Included in this was an assessment of
hydrogeological conditions beneath the site for 2016 and long term concentration trends for
chlorinated hydrocarbons in groundwater.
1.4 Scope of Work
The following tasks were completed to address the site’s groundwater monitoring requirements for
2016:
• Task 1 – fieldwork
• Task 2 – laboratory analysis
• Task 3 – data assessment and reporting
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:26
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Project Reference: 60518344
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Ppi Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 Ppi Gwmon 2016\Dms\Reports\60518344 Ppi Groundwater Monitoring 2016 Issue 2 Final.Docx
AECOM 7
2. Site Setting and History
2.1 Site Description
The site is located in the IDA Industrial Estate, Cork Road, Waterford, see Figure 1, and landuse in
the immediate vicinity of the site is industrial. The facility produces an extensive variety of technical
self-adhesive tapes for a wide range of applications in many sectors, including the electrical,
electronic, aerospace, photographic and audio/video areas.
The site is situated among other small industrial units, and consists of a number of small offices to the
front (south) of the building with the bulk of the building used for manufacturing. There is also a yard,
divided into the east and west yards, to the rear (north) of the site. The yards occupy approximately
25% of the site as a whole.
A map illustrating the locations of some of the neighbouring businesses within the IDA Industrial
Estate is presented in Figure 2.
2.2 Site Geology
Results of previous drilling works on-site confirm indications from published sources.
Overburden subsoils consist of made ground overlying natural orange/brown, firm to stiff, slightly
gravelly clay. Bedrock geology beneath the site has been mapped as rhyolithic volcanics and grey
and brown shale/slate of the Campile Formation, (Geological Survey of Ireland (GSI), (1995) Bedrock
Geology Map 1:100,000 Sheet 23). Intrusive site investigations have found weathered shale/slate
bedrock to be present from 6.0 m - 6.5 m below ground level (bgl) in the rear yard area, with depth to
weathered bedrock increasing slightly to the south (6.8 m bgl) and more substantially off-site to the
east (13.6 m bgl).
2.3 Hydrology
The nearest surface water features to the site are the Lisduggan Stream and St. John’s River.
The Lisduggan Stream lies about 500 m north-east of PPI and flows from north-west to south-east.
The stream flows into the St. John’s River approximately 2 km east of the site. Groundwater is not
expected to discharge into the Lisduggan Stream, as it is considered to be more of a shallow drainage
channel and bedrock groundwater is considered to be too deep (at >10 m below ground surface) to
be hydraulically connected to it.
The River Suir lies approximately 3 km north of the site and flows eastwards for approximately 12 km
before discharging into Waterford Harbour. St. John’s River flows into the River Suir in the centre of
Waterford, approximately 3.5 km north-east of the PPI site.
Neither the Lisduggan Stream, St. John’s River nor the River Suir are used for potable supply down-
gradient of the PPI site.
2.4 Hydrogeology
According to GSI online maps, the bedrock aquifer in the area is classified as a Regionally Important
Aquifer – fissured bedrock (Rf). Groundwater vulnerability in the industrial estate is assessed as
Moderate to High by the GSI.
Groundwater flow within the bedrock aquifer is complex due to local and regional topography, local
groundwater use, and the likely presence of fault zones and/or volcanic dykes. It is expected that
groundwater flow will be via fractures and fissures and the location of any main, laterally extensive
fractures would be expected to have a major control on flow direction.
According to the GSI website and AECOM’s knowledge of the area, there are groundwater abstraction
wells at four manufacturing facilities close to PPI and a former public water supply well, generally with Good to Excellent well yields recorded:
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:26
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Project Reference: 60518344
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Ppi Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 Ppi Gwmon 2016\Dms\Reports\60518344 Ppi Groundwater Monitoring 2016 Issue 2 Final.Docx
AECOM 8
• Honeywell International Technologies (550 m to the north-west, two wells currently abstracting
from depths greater than 30 m bgl and yields of 185 m3/d and 75 m
3/d)
• Hasbro (450 m to the west, drilled 1997, depth unknown, Excellent yield 602 m3/d)
• TEVA (former Kromberg & Schubert building) (240 m to the northwest, drilled 1968, 67.9 m deep, Good yield 141.7 m
3/d)
• Former Waterford Crystal site (770 m to the east-north-east, drilled 1968, 67.9 m deep, Excellent
yield 546 m3/d)
• Former Waterford Crystal site (825 m to the east north-east, drilled 1968, 94.2 m deep, Moderate
yield 65.5 m3/d)
• Former Waterford Corporation Public Water Supply (PWS) Well No. 3 (300 m to the east, drilled 1968, 61 m deep, Excellent yield 545 m
3/d)
The Waterford Corporation PWS is no longer in use and the wells at Waterford Crystal and TEVA are
also believed to be no longer in operation.
It should be noted that in Ireland there is no permitting system to govern well drilling or any
requirement to register wells. Therefore, publically available well records in Ireland are not complete;
wells used for domestic and other purposes are often not recorded by the owners or authorities.
2.5 Groundwater Monitoring Well Network
The site has installed a network of groundwater monitoring wells at locations within and outside of the
site boundary. The first well installed on site was the PPI well, which was drilled in 1997 and installed
as a deep bedrock aquifer monitoring well.
In 20101, 15 shallow monitoring wells (MW1 to MW15) were drilled and installed on site; these wells
are screened within overburden subsoils (see Figure 3). Four deeper on site monitoring wells,
screened within fractured bedrock (MW16, MW17, MW19 and MW20), were installed in 20122. PPI
also installed a sixth deep monitoring well (MW18) outside the site boundary to the east-north-east in
2012.
In addition to these wells, the site routinely monitors groundwater from selected bedrock aquifer
monitoring wells installed around (301, 404 and 501), and down-gradient (504 and 505) of, the former
Honeywell Process Solutions site. The former Honeywell site is located to the north of PPI, see Figure
2. The network of monitoring wells screened within the bedrock aquifer across the industrial estate is
illustrated in Figure 4.
2.6 Groundwater Monitoring and DQRA
Analysis of groundwater from beneath and down-gradient of the site has detected several chlorinated
hydrocarbons; some of the compounds detected are related to historic solvent use on-site (TCE and
related compounds). A detailed quantitative risk assessment (DQRA) of chlorinated hydrocarbons
detected in groundwater was completed in 2013 and submitted to the EPA3.
The DQRA concluded that there was a potential risk to down-gradient abstraction wells from
chlorinated hydrocarbons detected in groundwater from beneath the PPI site (TCE and related
compounds). It was also concluded that TCE is being biodegraded in situ, leading to declining
concentration trends, i.e. TCE is being naturally attenuated in groundwater. However, it was also
concluded that there are other VOCs detected in groundwater, which are not related to historic
practices on site, and which are also compromising the resource value of groundwater in bedrock
beneath the industrial estate. Annual groundwater monitoring was recommended to include monitored
natural attenuation (MNA) parameters indicative of redox state and biodegradation.
During annual groundwater monitoring conducted in 2014, a thin (0.155 m) floating layer of separate-
phase hydrocarbon was detected on groundwater in monitoring well MW20, a deep well in the
1 Source Audit and Soil Vapour Survey 2010, Issue 3 Final, 12 May 2011, reference: 49342246/CKRP0001
2 Further Site Investigation 2012, Issue 2 Final, 24 May 2012, reference: 46403011/CKRP0001
3 PPI Additional Site Investigation and QRA, Issue 2 Final, 24 June 2013, reference: 47092534/CKRP0001
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:26
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Project Reference: 60518344
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Ppi Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 Ppi Gwmon 2016\Dms\Reports\60518344 Ppi Groundwater Monitoring 2016 Issue 2 Final.Docx
AECOM 9
western yard screened within bedrock. Dissolved phase fuel hydrocarbon (as total petroleum
hydrocarbon, TPH) concentrations were detected in groundwater from adjacent wells.
In June 2015, the EPA requested (EPA request for information RI003936) that PPI undertake a desk
study into the source of TPH. They further requested that groundwater, from all PPI wells and down-
gradient wells, be sampled and analysed for TPH and potential risks posed by TPH contamination assessed in accordance with the EPA’s Guidance on the Management of Contaminated Land and
Groundwater at EPA Licensed Sites (2013). This was completed in 2015 and monitoring of
groundwater from selected wells for TPH was again included in the 2016 monitoring round.
3. FIELD METHOD AND OBSERVATIONS
Field work was completed on the 19 September 2016 and 22 November 2016.
3.1 Dip Round
A dip round of depth to groundwater and total well depth measurements was completed before any
wells were purged or sampled. To assist in assessing groundwater flow direction, all known monitoring
wells in this area of the industrial estate, in addition to on- and off-site wells scheduled for monitoring,
were included in the dip round if accessible, see Tables 1 and 2.
Depth measurements were taken using an interface probe which is capable of distinguishing between
water and non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPLs). Depending on the density of NAPL relative to water, it
can be detected as either a floating layer (if less dense, e.g. fuel hydrocarbons) or as a sinking layer
(if more dense, e.g. chlorinated solvents).
While 0.155 m of floating fuel hydrocarbon NAPL had been detected in well MW20 in August 2014, in
2016 no NAPL was detected, though a hydrocarbon sheen was noted on groundwater from MW20
when sampling.
Depth to groundwater measurements were converted to corresponding groundwater elevations
relative to Ordnance Datum (OD). Well and groundwater elevations are presented in Table 2.
Groundwater elevations in the shallow monitoring well network are illustrated in Figure 5, with
elevations in the deeper bedrock illustrated in Figure 6.
Several of the shallow monitoring wells were dry, and depths to groundwater in the remainder ranged
between 0.97 m and 3.65 m below ground level (bgl). The shallow wells monitor perched groundwater
and water level elevations can vary by over 1 m within a short distance. Therefore, it is difficult to draw
groundwater contours for shallow perched groundwater illustrating the direction of groundwater flow;
hence, no groundwater contours are illustrated in Figure 5.
Depth to groundwater measurements in the bedrock aquifer on-site in September 2016 ranged
between 10.28 m and 12.95 m bgl, these correspond to elevations between 15.29 m and
18.03 m OD. Depth to groundwater measurements were within previously reported ranges.
The PPI well consistently records the lowest groundwater elevation on site, see Figure 7. Changes in
groundwater elevation in the PPI well follow a similar pattern to corresponding changes in wells
MW16 and MW17; both of which are located close by (5 m to 17 m from the PPI well). Groundwater
elevations indicate that the groundwater level in the PPI well is consistently between 2 m and 3 m
lower than in well MW16 (located 5.2 m to the south-west) and MW17 (located 16.4 m to the
northeast), see Figure 8.
Across all the bedrock wells monitored, there appears to be a step-change in groundwater elevation
between the PPI on-site wells and off-site well TBH2 (with groundwater elevations generally between
17.1 m and 19.5 m OD), and the remainder of wells located to the north and east where groundwater
elevations are much lower than at the PPI site (with groundwater elevations generally between 10.0 m
and 12.5 m OD), see Figures 6 and 9.
Given the varying bedrock groundwater elevations in the wells to the south of this step-change (i.e.
due to the PPI well groundwater elevation issue), defining groundwater contours for the bedrock
aquifer beneath the PPI site itself is problematic.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:26
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Project Reference: 60518344
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Ppi Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 Ppi Gwmon 2016\Dms\Reports\60518344 Ppi Groundwater Monitoring 2016 Issue 2 Final.Docx
AECOM 10
To the north and east of PPI, consistent groundwater contours can be drawn (Figure 6) and indicate
that groundwater flow is to the north, then veering to the north-east. The horizontal hydraulic gradient
is estimated at ~0.02 between wells MW18 and 505.
The detection of TCE and related compounds in groundwater to the north and north-east of the PPI
site can also be used as a tracer for the direction of groundwater flow and supports the hydraulic
evidence.
3.2 Groundwater Sampling
Monitoring wells were sampled using the dedicated sampling equipment (inertial-lift tubing) which had
been previously installed in the deep wells.
Where possible, three times the volume of the standing water in each well was purged prior to
sampling. Well MW20 purged dry after 13 L (>1 well volume) had been purged; the groundwater level
was allowed to recover and MW20 was sampled on recovery. Well MW20 has purged dry during
previous monitoring rounds.
Field staff wore single-use, disposable nitrile/latex gloves during sampling which were changed
between wells to reduce the risk of cross-contamination. Samples were collected into laboratory
supplied sample containers, field filtered and preserved, where required. Samples were labelled in
the field and details recorded on a chain of custody form which accompanied the samples during
transit to the laboratory by overnight courier. On site and during transit, samples were stored in cool-
boxes chilled with frozen ice-packs.
As well 504 could not be located in September 2016, a return visit to site was required in November
2016 to sample this well. A sample from MW16 was also retaken in November 2016, as there were
some discrepancies in reported results for this well in September.
Well 301 could not be sampled on either occasion, as the well standpipe is blocked.
3.3 Water Quality Measurements
Toward the end of purging, field measurements of unstable water quality parameters were taken using
a calibrated water quality meter and, where possible, a flow-through cell to minimise contact with air.
Due to the small volume of water present in well MW20, it was not possible to take field water quality
measurements. Field measurements and observations are presented in Table 3. No water quality
measurements were recorded for well MW16 in November 2016.
pH
Groundwater pH was slightly below neutral, ranging from 6.06 (504) to 6.66 (505). pH values were
close to their long term averages. Typically, the pH range for groundwater in Ireland is 6.0 to 8.0.
Given that the bedrock is shale/slate and, therefore, low in carbonates, pH readings below 7.0 are to
be expected and are consistent with previous monitoring results at the site.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical conductivity readings in groundwater ranged from 369 µS/cm (501) to 548 µS/cm (504).
Most electrical conductivity readings were within previously reported ranges.
The reading for well MW17 (458 µS/cm) was slightly higher than the usual range for this well
(302 µS/cm to 394 µS/cm) but still within the overall range for wells in the monitoring round.
Temperature
Temperature readings were slightly above the normal range for Irish groundwater of 10ºC to 12ºC,
ranging between 11.9oC and 15.3
oC. However, groundwater temperature is typically above 12.5
oC for
these wells, so readings for 2016 were within normal ranges for the site.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:26
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Project Reference: 60518344
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Ppi Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 Ppi Gwmon 2016\Dms\Reports\60518344 Ppi Groundwater Monitoring 2016 Issue 2 Final.Docx
AECOM 11
Dissolved Oxygen
Dissolved oxygen readings ranged between 1.18 mg/L (PPI well) and 6.16 mg/L (MW19) in 2016. All
readings were below the concentration of 10-11 mg/L expected for fully aerated groundwater.
Dissolved oxygen in groundwater from the PPI well is usually below 2.0 mg/L and below 4.0 mg/L in
groundwater from other wells. In groundwater from wells MW18, MW19 and 501, the long term
average dissolved oxygen concentration is above 5.0 mg/L.
Redox Potential
Redox potential readings were recorded as oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) in the field and
adjusted to give Eh. Adjusted Eh readings ranged from 308 mV (MW17) to 366 (504) mV. Eh readings
indicate that groundwater varies between slightly reducing and slightly oxidising.
Both dissolved oxygen and redox potential are indicators of the reducing/oxidising state of
groundwater. Under reducing groundwater conditions TCE can be broken-down in the bedrock aquifer
through a process of reductive dechlorination. As TCE is broken-down cis-1,2-dichloroethene (cDCE)
is generated. cDCE, in turn, can be broken-down through a second reductive dechlorination step to
create vinyl chloride (VC, also called chloroethene).
3.4 Observations
A hydrocarbon sheen and odour were noted for groundwater from MW16 and MW20, both bedrock
wells are located close to the fill point for the diesel tank, see Figure 10.
Groundwater from all monitoring wells on site appeared cloudy and ranged in colour from yellow to
brown to grey. In the off-site monitoring wells, groundwater was generally cloudy and grey/brown in
colour.
4. LABORATORY ANALYSIS
4.1 Analytical Schedule
A sample inventory is presented in Table 1 detailing the monitoring wells sampled in 2016 and the
analyses scheduled. Groundwater from all of the bedrock aquifer monitoring wells sampled on-site
and off-site were scheduled for analysis of VOCs (including chlorinated hydrocarbons) and indicators
of MNA (redox and biodegradation indicators).
In addition, groundwater from selected wells on-site was analysed for TPH.
4.2 Assessment Criteria
Assessment of groundwater analytical data was completed by comparing results with published
guidelines and with criteria derived as part of the DQRA completed in 2013:
• Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Interim Guideline Values (IGVs)
• Groundwater Threshold Values, Statutory Instrument No. 9, 2010 and No. 366, 2016 (GTVs)
• Generic Assessment Criteria protective of human health receptors in the industrial estate
(commercial GACs)
• Controlled Water Site Specific Target Levels (SSTLs)
The IGVs represent negligible groundwater contamination and were developed in 2003 using a
number of existing water quality guidelines in use in Ireland and internationally, including existing
national environmental quality standards, proposed common indicators from the groundwater
directive, drinking water standards and Geological Survey of Ireland trigger values.
GTVs were published in 2010 and updated in 2016. Exceedance of a threshold value triggers further
investigation to confirm whether the criteria for poor groundwater chemical status are being met.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:26
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Project Reference: 60518344
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Ppi Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 Ppi Gwmon 2016\Dms\Reports\60518344 Ppi Groundwater Monitoring 2016 Issue 2 Final.Docx
AECOM 12
GACs protective of human health given the site’s industrial setting were derived; the only viable
pathway considered was vapour inhalation.
SSTLs, protective of potential groundwater users located 155 m down-gradient of the site were
derived for the site for TCE and related chlorinated hydrocarbons cDCE and VC as part of the DQRA
process in 2013. The DQRA model was revisited in 2015 in relation to fuel hydrocarbons and relevant
SSTLs were generated.
4.3 VOCs
Groundwater from five on-site and four off-site bedrock aquifer monitoring wells were analysed for
VOCs. In addition to chlorinated ethenes (TCE, cDCE and VC) a number of other VOCs are routinely
detected in groundwater from the bedrock aquifer beneath the industrial estate, specifically:
• Chlorinated methanes: trichlorofluoromethane (TCFM) and chloroform
• Chlorinated ethanes: 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCA) and 1,1-dichloroethane (DCA)
There is a marked distinction between the composition of the VOC suite detected in groundwater from
beneath the PPI site and that detected in groundwater from down-gradient of the PPI site.
Chlorinated ethenes dominate the suite detected beneath the PPI site, while chlorinated methanes
dominate off-site, see Figure 11.
VOC results for 2016 are presented in Table 4, together with available historic results.
No VOCs were detected above laboratory method detection limits (MDLs) in groundwater from well
MW19. No VOCs have been detected in groundwater from up-gradient well MW19 since it was first
sampled in February 2012.
TCE, cDCE and VC were initially detected in groundwater from MW20, up to 207 µg/L, but have
declined, with only a trace detection of vinyl chloride reported for 2016, 0.6 µg/L. Concentration
trends for MW20 are illustrated in Figure 12.
Chlorinated ethene concentrations have also declined in groundwater from MW16. TCE was below
the MDL in 2015 and 2016, and concentrations of cDCE and VC were 13 µg/L and 6 µg/L
respectively. cDCE had been detected at 2,214 µg/L in February 2012. Concentration trends are
illustrated in Figure 13.
In groundwater from MW17 chlorinated ethene concentrations over the longterm are relatively static.
TCE was detected at 70 µg/L while cDCE was detected at 228 µg/L, see Figure 14.
The highest VOC concentrations on-site are detected in groundwater from the PPI well; detections
are again dominated by chlorinated ethenes. In 2016 TCE was detected at 187 µg/L, cDCE at
1,576 µg/L and VC at 29 µg/L. Over the long term, the general trend in concentrations is downward,
see Figure 15.
A similar pattern of detections has been seen in groundwater from off-site monitoring wells 301 and
404, with chlorinated ethenes generally detected at low concentrations or below the MDL, while TCFM
is detected at several 1,000 µg/L. In 2016, it was not possible to sample groundwater from 301. In
groundwater from 404, chlorinated ethene concentrations were less than 20 µg/L, while TCFM was
detected at 1,711 µg/L. Chlorinated ethene concentrations are illustrated in Figure 16.
Chlorinated ethenes tend to be below detection in groundwater from off-site well 501, as was the case
in 2016. TCFM tends to be detected at the highest concentration in groundwater from this well,
120 µg/L in 2016, with an historic peak of 521 µg/L (November 1998).
In the farthest off-site wells, 504 and 505, low concentrations of chlorinated ethenes are detected,
generally <20 µg/L in groundwater from 504 and <50 µg/L in groundwater from 505. Concentration
trends for 504 are illustrated in Figure 17 while they are illustrated in Figure 18 for well 505.
TCFM is also detected in groundwater from both wells, with concentrations in groundwater from well
505 tending to be above 1,000 µg/L since December 2007, in 2016 the detected concentration was
930 µg/L.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:26
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Project Reference: 60518344
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Ppi Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 Ppi Gwmon 2016\Dms\Reports\60518344 Ppi Groundwater Monitoring 2016 Issue 2 Final.Docx
AECOM 13
With regard to detections of chlorinated ethenes in groundwater, cDCE is typically detected at higher
concentrations than TCE. In particular, in groundwater from the PPI well, which has the highest
chlorinated ethene concentrations, cDCE is detected >1,500 µg/L, while TCE is detected at
<150 µg/L, an order of magnitude difference. The greater prevalence of cDCE indicates that there has
been significant in situ biodegradation of TCE through in-situ reductive dechlorination in the
subsurface.
None of the VOC concentrations detected in groundwater exceeded GAC protective of human health
(in terms of potential vapour intrusion and inhalation). The concentrations of TCE and cDCE in
groundwater from the PPI well and MW17 exceeded the controlled water SSTL, as did VC in
groundwater from the PPI well and MW16.
4.4 Redox and Biodegradation Indicators
Results for indicators of redox conditions and biodegradation are presented in Table 5.
Results are not indicative of strongly reducing groundwater conditions, as nitrate is detected in
groundwater from several wells. However, dissolved iron and manganese are also detected in
groundwater from some wells (MW16, MW20, 504 and 505), and are indicative of slightly reducing
conditions in groundwater from these wells. Overall, borderline anaerobic groundwater conditions are
inferred for the bedrock aquifer.
There is no marked differentiation in chloride and total alkalinity concentrations between the wells;
concentration of chloride and alkalinity would be expected to increase as TCE is biodegraded.
However, this may reflect the low TCE concentrations detected in most groundwater samples, as TCE
concentrations are generally <50 µg/L.
The higher concentrations of cDCE in certain wells confirm that TCE is being biodegraded in-situ
through reductive dechlorination.
4.5 TPH
TPH results are presented in Table 6. Aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons were below the MDL in
groundwater from well MW19.
In groundwater from wells MW17 and the PPI well, the only hydrocarbons detected were aliphatics in
the carbon chain length range of C6-C8, this is concluded to correspond to chlorinated hydrocarbons
detected in the VOC suite rather than fuel hydrocarbons.
It was only in groundwater from wells MW16 and MW20 that fuel related hydrocarbons were detected.
Both wells are located close to the diesel tank and fill point, see Figure 10.
The absence of fuel hydrocarbons in groundwater from the PPI well and MW17 indicates that this fuel
impact is localised to MW16 and MW20.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:26
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Project Reference: 60518344
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Ppi Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 Ppi Gwmon 2016\Dms\Reports\60518344 Ppi Groundwater Monitoring 2016 Issue 2 Final.Docx
AECOM 14
5. DISCUSSION AND UPDATED CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
5.1 5.1 Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
Source
As detailed previously in the DQRA, the source of TCE detected in groundwater relates to its historic
use as a solvent at the PPI site, i.e. pre-1991. TCE entered ground in the eastern yard, where spent
barrels of TCE were left to drain. Limited TCE was detected in shallow soil and groundwater, with the
highest concentrations detected in groundwater from the deeper bedrock, from deeper than 9.5 m bgl.
Other chlorinated hydrocarbons detected in groundwater from across the industrial estate (TCFM,
TCA, etc.) were reportedly not used at the PPI site and their sources appear to be related to known,
historic activities located outside of the PPI site boundary.
Pathways and Receptors
Workers on site are not directly exposed to TCE and related compounds in groundwater, as they have
no contact with groundwater from beneath the site. The only potential pathway that workers on site, or
on adjacent sites, could potentially be exposed to TCE and related compounds, is through
volatilisation from groundwater upwards through the vadose zone atmosphere and into the above
ground atmosphere (breathing zone). However, concentrations in groundwater are at least two orders
of magnitude lower than GACs protective of human health via this pathway; therefore, workers are not
at significant risk from this pathway.
SSTLs were derived to be protective of potential controlled waters receptors down-gradient of the site.
Groundwater from the bedrock aquifer is known to be used for industrial supply purposes in the
industrial estate, and to have previously been used for potable water supply purposes. While the
former Waterford Corporation public water supply (PWS) well, which was located 310 m from the site,
is no longer used, the DQRA considered the risk to a potential supply well located at 155 m down-
gradient of the site, i.e. half the distance from the site of the former PWS well.
In 2016, TCE and cDCE exceeded their respective SSTLs in groundwater from wells MW17 and the
PPI well, while VC exceeded its in groundwater from the PPI well and MW16. Concentrations of TCE,
cDCE and VC decline with distance from the PPI well, as illustrated in Figure 19.
Concentration data are available for the PPI well dating back to 1997, and reported concentrations of
TCE and cDCE peaked in 2002. Taking the declining concentrations from 2002 to 2016, the half-lives
of TCE and cDCE have been estimated at 4.75 years and 9.5 years, respectively, see Figure 20.
These values are consistent with those estimated in the 2013 DQRA and are comparable with the
higher end of typical TCE and cDCE half-life values from published literature sources.
Taking these half-lives and reported concentrations in the PPI well for 2016, it is estimated that it will
take ~35 years for cDCE concentrations in groundwater from the PPI well to decline to the SSTL,
while it will take TCE less than 10 years to reach the relevant SSTL (see Figure 20). These timescale
estimates are also consistent with those from the DQRA.
VC concentrations in groundwater from the PPI well are not following clear trend (see Figure 15). In
addition, VC remains below detection limits in groundwater from all wells down-gradient of the site.
As VC is a reductive breakdown product of cDCE, it will likely be detected in groundwater from
beneath the PPI site for as long as elevated cDCE is also detected.
The DQRA was conservative in calculating SSTLs that are protective of a compliance point at 155 m
down-gradient of the site, given that there is no actual supply well at this distance down-gradient of
the site, there is no known other potable groundwater user in the vicinity. The former PWS well at
310 m has not been used for many years and it is understood that there are no plans to return it to
use.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:26
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Project Reference: 60518344
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Ppi Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 Ppi Gwmon 2016\Dms\Reports\60518344 Ppi Groundwater Monitoring 2016 Issue 2 Final.Docx
AECOM 15
5.2 Fuel Hydrocarbons
Source
The source of fuel hydrocarbons in groundwater is related to the diesel storage tank and fill point
located between the eastern and western yards. The tank has a 2,000 L capacity and is double
skinned, it is reported by site personnel to be only a couple of years old and is situated within a bund.
Fuel in the tank powers the sprinkler pump house located in the north-western corner of the western
yard; the fuel supply is gravity fed from the tank to the pump house. Limited fuel is used for this
purpose, as the system is not in regular use, but is only tested on a weekly basis.
PPI have a second site within the industrial estate, which is located some distance to the north. The
second site has its own diesel tank, which is used to refuel PPI vehicles. Sometime prior to the August
2014 groundwater monitoring round, the refuelling system at the other site broke-down and the fuel
tank in the rear yard of the was used as a temporary backup supply for PPI vehicles.
As staff were unfamiliar with using the backup system, the refuelling point was not properly secured
following use, with a resulting loss of fuel to ground. PPI has not been able to estimate the volume of
fuel lost to ground at that time, but consider it to have been limited.
The fuel tank in the rear yard is no longer used to supply PPI vehicles, as the other refuelling system
was repaired. Improvements have also been made to the fill point, and it is now locked, reducing the
likelihood that a similar loss could occur.
Pathways and Receptors
Fuel lost to ground is interpreted to have migrated vertically downward through cracks in concrete of
the rear yard to the water table. No separate phase fuel hydrocarbons were detected when the
shallow wells were dipped in August 2014 and June 2015, indicating the fuel did not spread out
laterally. A layer of separate phase was detected in well MW20, declining from 0.155 m in August
2014 to 0.003 m in June 2015, indicating that the fuel migrated vertically downward through the
overburden to the watertable in the bedrock. In the 2016 monitoring round, no separate phase was
detected but a hydrocarbon sheen was observed on groundwater from wells MW16 and MW20.
Similarly to chlorinated hydrocarbons, workers on site are not directly exposed to fuel hydrocarbons in
groundwater, as they have no contact with groundwater from beneath the site. The only potential
pathway that workers on site, or on adjacent sites, could potentially be exposed to fuel hydrocarbons,
is through volatilisation from groundwater upwards through the vadose zone atmosphere and into the
above ground atmosphere. GACs protective of human health via this pathway were not generated, as
it is calculated that the vapour pathway would become saturated at a concentration below that at
which a potential risk could be generated.
The DQRA model from 2013 was revisited in 2015 to devise controlled water SSTLs, again taking the
compliance point as being a water supply well at a distance of 155 m down-gradient of the site. For
the majority of hydrocarbon fractions, no risk to the controlled water receptor could be generated, as
most components of diesel are not sufficiently soluble in water to impact upon ground water at a
compliance point 155 m from site, see Table 6.
It was possible to calculate SSTLs for aromatic hydrocarbons in the carbon chain length range of C10-
C12 and C12-C16, with concentrations of these ranges in groundwater from MW20 and MW16
exceeding the SSTLs. However, in groundwater from the PPI well and MW17, which are located
down-gradient and within 5 m to 22 m of wells MW16 and MW20, concentrations of all fuel-related
hydrocarbons are below detection limits.
There are elevated concentrations of some of the heavier hydrocarbon fractions (>C16 chain length
fractions) in groundwater from MW16 and MW20, which is to be expected given the observation of
hydrocarbon sheen. However, these fractions have very low solubility and mobility, and therefore will
have only very localised impact beneath the rear yard. This is confirmed by the absence of these
fractions in groundwater from the down-gradient PPI well and MW17.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Project Reference: 60518344
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Ppi Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 Ppi Gwmon 2016\Dms\Reports\60518344 Ppi Groundwater Monitoring 2016 Issue 2 Final.Docx
AECOM 16
6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 Conclusions
A groundwater monitoring round was conducted in September and November 2016 at the PPI site in
the IDA Industrial Estate, Cork Road, Waterford, with samples collected to assess concentrations of
chlorinated hydrocarbons and fuel hydrocarbons in groundwater from beneath the site and selected
off-site wells located down-gradient.
Chlorinated hydrocarbons have been detected in groundwater from beneath the PPI site since the
PPI well was installed in 1997. Some of the chlorinated hydrocarbons detected (the chlorinated
ethenes, TCE, cDCE and VC) are related to the historic use of TCE on site up to 1991. Other
hydrocarbons (TCFM, 1,1,1-TCA) detected are related to off-site sources unrelated to PPI.
Groundwater flow across the industrial estate is complex. Varying groundwater elevations over short
distances hamper determination of the groundwater flow direction in bedrock directly beneath the site.
However, beyond the northern site boundary the groundwater flow direction can be determined to be
generally to the north and north-east, with detections of chlorinated ethenes to the north and north-
east also acting as a tracer for groundwater flow from the PPI site in this direction.
Results for 2016 indicate that chlorinated ethene concentrations in groundwater from beneath the PPI
site and off-site continue to decline.
A DQRA was completed in 2013, and the conceptual site model developed remains valid. There are
no viable human health receptors exposed to chlorinated ethenes in groundwater either on site or off-
site. As a conservative measure, the DQRA considered the controlled waters receptor to be a
hypothetical water supply well located 155 m down-gradient of the site. Current concentrations in
groundwater from the PPI well, MW16 and MW17 are above SSTLs calculated to be protective of this
receptor.
Based on concentration trends in the PPI well, calculated concentration half-lives have been
estimated indicating that it will take cDCE approximately 35 years to decline to the SSTL protective of
such a water supply well, while it will take TCE less than 10 years to reach the SSTL.
While VC concentrations in groundwater from the PPI well itself do not appear to be following a
declining trend, VC remains below detection limits in all groundwater from down-gradient of the site.
The 2013 DQRA was conservative in calculating SSTLs that are protective of a compliance point at
155 m down-gradient of the site, given that there is no supply well at this distance down-gradient of
the site, there is no known other potable groundwater user in the vicinity and the former PWS well at
310 m has not been used for many years and it is understood that there are no plans to return it to
use.
In August 2014, separate phase fuel hydrocarbons were detected in deep monitoring well MW20.
The thickness of separate phase fuel hydrocarbons in MW20 has declined from the initial measured
thickness of 0.155 m in August 2014 to 0.003 m in June 2015, and only a sheen was observed in
2016.
Elevated dissolved phase fuel hydrocarbon concentrations are limited to groundwater from bedrock
wells MW20 and MW16, which are within 15 m of each other. Within a further 5 m to 22 m dissolved
phase concentrations decline below detection limits in bedrock wells and none of the shallow wells
have shown fuel hydrocarbon impacts in recent groundwater monitoring rounds.
The DQRA developed in 2013 was revisited in 2015 to derive SSTLs for various fractions of fuel
hydrocarbons. For many fuel hydrocarbon fractions no risk to the controlled water receptor could be
generated, as components of diesel are not sufficiently soluble in water to impact upon groundwater
at a compliance point 155 m from site. Therefore, while fuel hydrocarbon concentrations in
groundwater from MW16 and MW20 are elevated, the low solubility and mobility means that they
have only limited, localised impact beneath the rear yard of the PPI facility. The declining thickness of
free phase hydrocarbon detected from 2014 to 2016 suggests rapid depletion of the original
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Project Reference: 60518344
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Ppi Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 Ppi Gwmon 2016\Dms\Reports\60518344 Ppi Groundwater Monitoring 2016 Issue 2 Final.Docx
AECOM 17
hydrocarbon source, suggesting a short term loss, as was inferred from the short term use of the
diesel tank to fuel vehicles.
6.2 Recommendations
It is recommended that groundwater monitoring continue on an annual basis. Analysis for VOC,
chlorinated ethenes, indicators of biodegradation and redox, should be undertaken on groundwater
samples from bedrock aquifer monitoring wells located on the PPI site (the PPI well and MW16,
MW17, MW19 and MW20) and off-site (wells 301, 404, 501 504 and 505), if accessible.
Given the low mobility and solubility of the fuel hydrocarbons detected, it is recommended that future
analysis of fuel hydrocarbons be limited to bedrock aquifer monitoring wells located within the rear
yard.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Project Reference: 60518344
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Ppi Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 Ppi Gwmon 2016\Dms\Reports\60518344 Ppi Groundwater Monitoring 2016 Issue 2 Final.Docx
AECOM
Figures
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Ordnance Survey Ireland Licence No EN 0001916©Ordnance Survey Ireland and Government of Ireland
SITELOCATION
Approximate Scale
1km 2km0 km
WATERFORD
DOUGLAS BUSINESS CENTRE, CARRIGALINE ROAD,DOUGLAS, CORK
TEL +353 21 436 5006 WWW.AECOM.COM
DRAWING TITLE
FIGURE 1 - SITE LOCATION PLAN
PPI ADHESIVE PRODUCTS LIMITED
CLIENT
PROJECT
N
Job No. SCALE
TRACED CHECKED
REV.
DRAWN APPROVED
FO’RDATE
A
DEC 2016EO’H KF
60518344AS SHOWN
GROUNDWATER MONITORING 2016
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
PPI
RigneyDolphin
NationalLearning Continental
Administration
Enterprise Ireland / IDA
SanofiAventis(To Let)Novartis
(Former Site)
TEVAUnit 14-15
TEVA
TEVA
TEVA
WaterfordStanley
St. Otteran’sCemetery
House of Donohoe
House of Donohoe
WITTraining
Hitol
HarveyPrinters
Schivo Precision(Units 1-4)
WaterfordCarpets
WIT
SchivoFabrication
HoneywellProcessSolutionsAPS
SunLifeKeltech
Eng
AIB
College FieldsApartments
Waterford Instituteof Technology
WITSports Hall
Sebic
(For Sale)
RungaPrecision
DOUGLAS BUSINESS CENTRE, CARRIGALINE ROAD,DOUGLAS, CORK
TEL +353 21 436 5006 WWW.AECOM.COM
DRAWING TITLE
FIGURE 2 - NEIGHBOURING BUSINESSES IN IDA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE
PPI ADHESIVE PRODUCTS LIMITED
CLIENT
PROJECT
N
APPROXIMATE SCALE
0 m 100 m
Job No. SCALE
TRACED CHECKED
REV.
DRAWN APPROVED
FO’RDATE
A
DEC 2016EO’H KF
60518344AS SHOWN
GROUNDWATER MONITORING 2016
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
SHALLOW WELL LOCATION
lerraB erotS
lerraB erotS
hcti
wSmo
oR
lerr
aBer
otS
lerr
aBer
otS
lerr
aBer
otS
lerr
aBer
otS
lerr
aBer
otS
lerr
aBer
otS
knaT retaW
skna
T
MW4
MW8
MW11
MW15
MW12
MW14
MW13
KeyPPI ADHESIVE PRODUCTS LIMITED
GROUNDWATER MONITORING 2016
CLIENT
PROJECT
DRAWING TITLE
FIGURE 3 - SHALLOW BOREHOLE LOCATION PLAN
Job No.SCALE
TRACED CHECKED
REV.
DRAWN APPROVED
BMCDATE
A
DEC 2016EO’H KF
60518344AS SHOWN
DOUGLAS BUSINESS CENTRE, CARRIGALINE ROAD,DOUGLAS, CORK
TEL +353 21 436 5006 WWW.AECOM.COM
MW9
MW5
MW10
MW7
MW6
MW3
MW2
MW1 N
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
101
MW18
MW19
PPI WELL PPI WELL MW20
301
404
302
603501
303402
505
504
PPI WELL PPI WELL MW17
TBH1
TBH2
TBH3
TBH4
TBH5
MW16
DRAWING TITLE
FIGURE 4 - BEDROCK MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS
Job No.SCALE
TRACED CHECKED
REV.
DRAWN APPROVED
BMCDATE
A
DEC 2016EO’H KF
60518344AS SHOWN
PPI ADHESIVE PRODUCTS LIMITED
GROUNDWATER MONITORING 2016
CLIENT
PROJECT
Key
ORDNANCE SURVEY OF IRELAND LICENCE NO. EN001916APPROXIMATE SCALE
0 m 100 m
PPI BEDROCK AQUIFERMONITORING WELHONEYWELL BEDROCK AQUIFERMONITORING WEL
NOTES
WCC BEDROCK AQUIFER MONITORING WELL
DOUGLAS BUSINESS CENTRE, CARRIGALINE ROAD,DOUGLAS, CORK
TEL +353 21 436 5006 WWW.AECOM.COM
N
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
KeyCLIENT
PROJECT
DRAWING TITLE
Job No.SCALE
TRACED CHECKED
REV.
DRAWN APPROVED
BMCDATE
A
DEC 2016EO’H KF
60518344AS SHOWN
North
DOUGLAS BUSINESS CENTRE, CARRIGALINE ROAD,DOUGLAS, CORK
TEL +353 21 436 5006 WWW.AECOM.COM
DRY
DRY
DRY
24.54
25.14
26.02
25.56
25.36
26.71
26.29
NM
26.30
27.21
25.65
24.49
25.15
25.08
NM
25.20
25.21
26.10
26.19
26.95
26.72
NM
27.22
27.27
24.96
25.11
25.65
NM
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
101101
301301
404404
302302
603603501501
303303402402
505505
504504
101
MW18MW18MW18
MW19MW19
MW20MW20PPI WELL PPI WELL
MW17MW17
MW16MW16
MW19
PPI WELL PPI WELL MW20
301
404
302
603501
303402
505
504
PPI WELL PPI WELL MW17
TBH1
TBH2
TBH3
TBH4
TBH5
MW16
DRAWING TITLE
FIGURE 6 - BEDROCK CONTOURS19 SEPTEMBER 2016
Job No.SCALE
TRACED CHECKED
REV.
DRAWN APPROVED
BMCDATE
A
DEC 2016EO’H KF
60518344AS SHOWN
PPI ADHESIVE PRODUCTS LIMITED
GROUNDWATER MONITORING 2016
CLIENT
PROJECT
Key
ORDNANCE SURVEY OF IRELAND LICENCE NO. EN001916APPROXIMATE SCALE
0 m 100 m
PPI BEDROCK AQUIFER MONITORING WELL
HONEYWELL BEDROCK AQUIFERMONITORING WELL
NOTES
WCC BEDROCK AQUIFER MONITORING WELL
DOUGLAS BUSINESS CENTRE, CARRIGALINE ROAD,DOUGLAS, CORK
TEL +353 21 436 5006 WWW.AECOM.COM
N
10.19 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION (OD)
GROUNDWATER CONTOURS (OD)
NM NOT MEASURED (INACCESSIBLE/BLOCKED)
GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS NOT CONTOURED SOUTH OF THIS LINE
INFERRED GROUNDWATER FLOW
13.2513.25
17.7717.77
18.0818.08
18.3118.3118.0118.01
15.8415.84
17.8217.82
11.7411.74
NMNM
10.1910.19
10.1910.19
10.6010.60
10.4910.49
10.7110.7110.8610.86
11.5011.50
10.7210.72
10.8310.83
13.2513.25
17.7717.77
18.0818.08
18.3118.3118.0118.01
15.8415.84
17.8217.82
11.7411.74
10.6010.60
10.4910.49
10.7110.7110.8610.86
11.5011.50
10.7210.72
10.8310.83
NMNMNMNM
NMNM
NMNM
12.93
17.39
17.55
18.0317.21
15.29
17.68
NM
10.01910.019
10.1910.19
9.70
NM
10.08
9.98
10.189.33
NM
10.20
10.30
NMNM
NM
NM
11.0 m
12.0 m
13.0 m
11.0 m
10.0 m
12.0 m
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: EOHFigure 7
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
15
16
17
18
19
20
Sep-2011 Apr-2012 Oct-2012 May-2013 Nov-2013 Jun-2014 Dec-2014 Jul-2015 Jan-2016 Aug-2016 Mar-2017
Gro
un
dw
ate
r E
lev
ati
on
(m
OD
)PPI On-Site Bedrock Aquifer Monitoring Wells
PPI
MW16
MW17
MW19
MW20
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
MADE GROUND
LEGEND
GRAVELLY CLAY - OVERBURDEN
SHALE/SLATE BEDROCK
GROUNDWATER LEVEL
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION
1
A
B
GROUNDWATER FLOW
GROUNDWATER
POTENTIAL SOURCES
KNOWN RECEPTOR
POTENTIAL RECEPTOR
PATHWAYS
UPGRADIENT OF PPI - TCFM
2 REAR YARD - CHLOROETHENES
IDENTIFIED SOURCES
LOWER RIVER SUIR ESTUARY
PROJECT
CLIENT
DRAWING TITLE
DRAWN TRACED CHECKED APPROVED
BMC EOH KF
ASCALE JOB NO.
DATE
REV
NTS
DEC 2016
60518344
FIGURE 6 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODELCROSS SECTION SOUTHWEST-NORTHEAST
PPI ADHESIVE PRODUCTS LIMITED
GROUNDWATER MONITORING 2016
12
11
?
B
A
11
DOUGLAS BUSINESS CENTRE, CARRIGALINE ROAD,DOUGLAS, CORK
TEL +353 21 436 5006 WWW.AECOM.COM
?
??
??
INFERRED GROUND SURFACE
For in
spec
tion p
urpo
ses o
nly.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: EOHFigure 9
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
22.5
Dec-2011 Jul-2012 Jan-2013 Aug-2013 Mar-2014 Sep-2014 Apr-2015 Oct-2015 May-2016 Nov-2016 Jun-2017
Gro
un
dw
ate
r E
lev
ati
on
(m
OD
)Bedrock Aquifer Monitoring Wells Across Industrial Estate
PPI MW16 MW17 MW19 MW20
MW18 TBH2 TBH5 301 404
501 504 505
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
KeyCLIENT
PROJECT
DRAWING TITLE
Job No.SCALE
TRACED CHECKED
REV.
DRAWN APPROVED
BMCDATE
A
DEC 2016EO’H KF
60518344AS SHOWN
North
DOUGLAS BUSINESS CENTRE, CARRIGALINE ROAD,DOUGLAS, CORK
TEL +353 21 436 5006 WWW.AECOM.COM
DRY
DRY
DRY
24.54
25.14
26.02
25.56
25.36
26.71
NM
26.30
27.21
25.65
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: EOHFigure 11 Detected VOC Composition
PPI Adhesives Groundwater Monitoring 2016
MW16 November 2016
Chlorinated Ethenes
Chlorinated Ethanes
Chlorinated Methanes
Other VOCs
Total VOC Concentration
29 µg/LMW17 September 2016
Chlorinated Ethenes
Chlorinated Ethanes
Chlorinated Methanes
Other VOCs
Total VOC Concentration
311 µg/L
PPI Well September 2016
Chlorinated Ethenes
Chlorinated Ethanes
Chlorinated Methanes
Other VOCs
Total VOC Concentration
1,745 µg/L
404 September 2016
Chlorinated Ethenes
Chlorinated Ethanes
Chlorinated Methanes
Other VOCs
Total VOC Concentration
1,736 µg/L
501 September 2016
Chlorinated Ethenes
Chlorinated Ethanes
Chlorinated Methanes
Other VOCs
Total VOC Concentration
153 µg/L
504 November 2016
Chlorinated Ethenes
Chlorinated Ethanes
Chlorinated Methanes
Other VOCs
Total VOC Concentration
58 µg/L
505 September 2016
Chlorinated Ethenes
Chlorinated Ethanes
Chlorinated Methanes
Other VOCs
Total VOC Concentration
9864 µg/L
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: EOH
Figure 12
PPI Adhesives Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Page 1 of 1
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
0
50
100
150
200
250
Jul-11 Apr-12 Dec-12 Aug-13 Apr-14 Dec-14 Sep-15 May-16 Jan-17
Co
ncen
trati
on
s (
µµ µµg
/L)
MW20 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Vinyl Chloride
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: EOH
Figure 13
PPI Adhesives Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Page 1 of 1
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Jul-11 Apr-12 Dec-12 Aug-13 Apr-14 Dec-14 Sep-15 May-16 Jan-17
Co
ncen
trati
on
s (
µµ µµg
/L)
MW16 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Vinyl Chloride
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: EOH
Figure 14
PPI Adhesives Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Page 1 of 1
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
0
50
100
150
200
250
Jul-11 Apr-12 Dec-12 Aug-13 Apr-14 Dec-14 Sep-15 May-16 Jan-17
Co
ncen
trati
on
s (
µµ µµg
/L)
MW17 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Vinyl Chloride
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: EOH
Figure 15
PPI Adhesives Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Page 1 of 1
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
Oct-95 Aug-97 Jun-99 Mar-01 Jan-03 Nov-04 Aug-06 Jun-08 Apr-10 Feb-12 Nov-13 Sep-15 Jul-17
Co
ncen
trati
on
s (
µµ µµg
/L)
PPI Well - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Vinyl Chloride
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: EOH
Figure 16
PPI Adhesives Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Page 1 of 1
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Oct-95 Aug-97 Jun-99 Mar-01 Jan-03 Nov-04 Aug-06 Jun-08 Apr-10 Feb-12 Nov-13 Sep-15 Jul-17
Co
ncen
trati
on
s (
µµ µµg
/L)
404 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Vinyl Chloride
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: EOH
Figure 17
PPI Adhesives Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Page 1 of 1
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Oct-95 Aug-97 Jun-99 Mar-01 Jan-03 Nov-04 Aug-06 Jun-08 Apr-10 Feb-12 Nov-13 Sep-15 Jul-17
Co
ncen
trati
on
s (
µµ µµg
/L)
504 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Vinyl Chloride
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: EOH
Figure 18
PPI Adhesives Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Page 1 of 1
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Oct-95 Aug-97 Jun-99 Mar-01 Jan-03 Nov-04 Aug-06 Jun-08 Apr-10 Feb-12 Nov-13 Sep-15 Jul-17
Co
ncen
trati
on
s (
µµ µµg
/L)
505 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Vinyl Chloride
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: EOHFigure 19
PPI Adhesives Groundwater Monitoring 2016
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225
Co
ncen
trati
on
(µµ µµ
g/L
)
Distance from PPI Well (m)
Concentration vs Distance
TCE
cDCE
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: EOHFigure 20
PPI Adhesives Groundwater Monitoring 2016
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
y = -0.0004x + 20.37
R² = 0.9168
y = -0.0002x + 17.708
R² = 0.8274
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Apr-01 Jan-04 Oct-06 Jul-09 Apr-12 Dec-14 Sep-17
Natu
ral
Lo
g o
f C
on
cen
trati
on
(µµ µµ
g/L
)Concentration vs Time Degradation Rate
TCE
cDCE
Linear (TCE)
Linear (cDCE)
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Project Reference: 60518344
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Ppi Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 Ppi Gwmon 2016\Dms\Reports\60518344 Ppi Groundwater Monitoring 2016 Issue 2 Final.Docx
AECOM
Tables
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: EOHTable 1 - Sample Inventory 2016
PPI Adhesive Products, Waterford
Well IDDip
MeasurementField WQ VOCs
Redox and
MNA
Indicators
TPH-CWG
MW1 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW2 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW3 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW4 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW5 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW6 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW7 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW8 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW9 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW10 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW11 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW12 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW13 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW14 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW15 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW16 x x x x x
MW17 x x x x x
MW18 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW19 x x x x xMW20 x x x x x
PPI Well x x x x x101* x ~ ~ ~ ~301* x x x x ~
302* x ~ ~ ~ ~
303* x ~ ~ ~ ~
401* x ~ ~ ~ ~
402* x ~ ~ ~ ~
404* x x x x ~
501* x x x x ~
504* ~ x x x ~
505* x x x x ~
603* x ~ ~ ~ ~
TBH2** x ~ ~ ~ ~
TBH3** x ~ ~ ~ ~
TBH4** x ~ ~ ~ ~
TBH5** x ~ ~ ~ ~
Notes:
x = Indicates parameter to be measured or scheduled for analysis
~ = Indicates well not sampled/parameter not analysed
* = Honeywell Process Solutions groundwater monitoring well
** = Waterford City Council groundwater monitoring well around Teva site
VOC = Volatile organic compound
Field WQ - Water quality parameters (pH, electrical conductivity, dissolved
oxygen, redox potential and temperature)
TPH-CWG = Total petroleum hydrocarbons criteria working group, speciated
aliplhatics and aromatics
Redox and Biodegradation Indicators = Dissolved iron and manganese, chloride,
sulphate, nitrate and nitrite, total alkalinity
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: EOHTable 2 - Well Co-Ordinates and Depth Measurements - 19 September 2016 -
PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
Depth to Groundwater
m bct
Groundwater Elevation
m OD
MW1 27.773 4.01 2.0 258296.102 110687.829 2.668 25.105 ~ ~
MW2 27.947 3.30 2.0 258289.978 110681.987 2.991 24.956 ~ ~
MW3 28.195 3.22 2.0 258288.368 110675.286 0.972 27.223 ~ ~
MW4 28.281 3.73 2.0 258289.124 110671.030 1.559 26.722 ~ ~
MW5 28.425 3.97 2.0 258290.432 110665.707 2.232 26.193 ~ ~
MW6 28.237 Blocked 2.0 258295.872 110673.561 Blocked ~ ~ ~
MW7 28.353 1.71 1.0 258298.511 110667.677 1.079 27.274 ~ ~
MW8 28.207 3.88 2.0 258283.938 110670.122 1.260 26.947 ~ ~
MW9 28.370 3.83 2.0 258284.291 110664.057 2.273 26.097 ~ ~
MW10 28.243 3.72 2.0 258276.181 110668.371 3.097 25.146 ~ ~
MW11 28.141 3.90 2.0 258269.985 110670.242 3.649 24.492 ~ ~
MW12 28.313 3.41 2.0 258267.407 110664.192 3.229 25.084 ~ ~
MW13 28.376 3.85 2.0 258270.434 110660.819 3.172 25.204 ~ ~
MW14 28.406 4.05 2.0 258264.103 110657.463 3.194 25.212 ~ ~
MW15 28.196 3.81 2.0 258260.953 110666.208 Dry ~ ~ ~
MW16 28.305 16.92 6.0 258283.028 110669.760 10.277 18.028 ~ ~
MW17 27.850 17.08 3.0 258295.283 110687.575 10.464 17.386 ~ ~
MW18 25.680 17.14 3.0 258456.403 110716.894 12.752 12.928 ~ ~
MW19 28.374 15.25 4.0 258281.585 110588.118 10.821 17.553 ~ ~
MW20 28.355 16.96 6.0 258269.154 110665.790 11.145 17.210 ~ ~
PPI Well 28.233 18.18 3.0 258285.928 110674.130 12.946 15.287 ~ ~
101 28.806 24.41 16.0 258227.523 110840.314 18.605 10.201 ~ ~
301 28.401 21.50 5.0 258270.958 110807.018 Blocked ~ ~ ~
302 28.326 Blocked 6.0 258250.547 110902.625 Blocked ~ ~ ~
303 28.412 22.75 6.0 258292.721 110908.966 18.235 10.177 ~ ~
401 ~ Blocked 4.0 ~ ~ Blocked ~ ~ ~
402 28.518 30.57 3.0 258289.518 110908.317 19.191 9.327 ~ ~
404 28.151 25.32 4.0 258325.265 110819.747 18.071 10.080 ~ ~
501 28.428 31.05 18.0 258329.890 110877.775 18.452 9.976 ~ ~
504 25.585 28.00 9.0 258479.248 110953.756 ~ ~ ~ ~
505 24.993 28.63 9.0 258496.642 110873.486 15.298 9.695 ~ ~
603 28.789 22.88 ~ ~ ~ 18.487 10.302 ~ ~
TBH1 30.350 Destoyed 12.5 258066.976 110731.546 ~ ~ ~ ~
TBH2 29.320 26.00 16.5 258141.972 110645.721 8.317 17.683 ~ ~
TBH3 29.380 ~ 14.7 258185.135 110704.330 ~ ~ ~ ~
TBH4 29.340 ~ 15.0 258180.146 110725.656 ~ ~ ~ ~
TBH5 29.310 29.50 13.0 258211.654 110752.689 ~ ~ ~ ~
Note:
m bct - metres below casing top
~ - not measured
NAPL - non aqueous phase liquid
NAPL
Thickness
Installed by
Waterford
City Council
m OD - metres relative to Ordnance Datum, elevations for PPI wells are taken from AECOM/URS 2012 survey, elevations for other wells are taken from FCG surveys in 2009 and
2011 for the Environmental Protection Agency and Waterford City Council respectively.
Monitoring
Point
PPI Shallow
Monitoring
Wells
PPI Bedrock
Aquifer
Monitoring
Wells
Installed by
Other
Businesses
in Industrial
Estate
Depth to
NAPL19-Sep-16
Northing Co-
Ordinate
m
Well
Elevation
m OD
Total Depth
m bct
Easting Co-
Ordinate
m
Screen
Length
m
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: EOHTable 3 - Water Quality Field Parameters - 2016
PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
Monitoring
Point
DO
mg/LpH
Eh
mV
EC
µµµµS/cm
TempoC
3 x Well
Volume L
Purged
Volume LComments
MW16 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 40 40Cloudy, brown water, slight sheen and
hydrocarbon odour.
MW17 3.95 6.54 308 458 14.8 40 40 Cloudy, brown water, NVO.
MW19 6.16 6.50 316 464 15.0 30 30 Cloudy, yellow water, NVO.
MW20 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 35 13*Cloudy grey water, hydrocarbon sheen and
strong odour.
PPI Well 1.18 6.53 327 452 13.0 31 32 Clear and colourless water, NVO.
404 3.41 6.55 324 430 13.5 43 44 Cloudy, grey water, NVO.
501 5.92 6.42 330 369 15.3 52 53 Cloudy brown water, NVO.
504 3.30 6.06 366 548 11.9 74 74 Cloudy, grey water, NVO.
505 2.94 6.66 325 489 14.2 80 80 Cloudy, grey water, NVO.
Note:
NM - Not measured NVO - No visual or olfactory evidence of contamination
DO - Dissolved oxygen mg/L - Milligrams per litre
Eh - Redox potential mV - Millivolts
EC - Electrical conductivity µS/cm - Microsiemens per centimetre
Temp - Temperature oC - Degrees Celsius
* - Well purged dry before three well volumes removed
~ Insufficient water for water qaulity readings
As recommended by instrument manufacturer, field redox potential (ORP) readings were adjusted to give corresponding Eh readings.
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Updated by: EOH
Checked by: EOHTable 4 - Bedrock Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Results (µµµµg/L) 2016 - PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
MW18
Jun-15 Feb-12 Mar-13 Aug-14 Jun-15 Nov-16 Feb-12 Mar-13 Aug-14 Jun-15 Sep-16 Feb-12
Dichlorodifluoromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 190 - - - - - - - - - - -
MTBE <0.1 10 30 ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - 0.2 -
Chloromethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 14800 - - - - - - - - - - -
Vinyl Chloride <0.1 0.375 ---- 2.25 741 86 48 66 13 6 - - - - 0.5 -
Bromomethane <1 ---- ---- ---- 7 - - - - - - - - - - -
Chloroethane <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - -
Trichlorofluoromethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 230000 4 6 - - - 30 17 13 12 12 -
1,1-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* ---- 210000 - - - - - - - - - - -
Carbon Disulphide NA ---- ---- ---- 67200 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Dichloromethane <3 15 10 ---- 20 - - - - - - - - - - -
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* ---- 197000 6 - - 4 - - - - - - -
1,1-Dichloroethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 3200000 - - - - - - - - - - -
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* 130 147000 2,214 725 367 15 13 192 62 125 213 228 -
2,2-Dichloropropane <1 ---- ---- ---- No criteria - - - - - - - - - - -
Bromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 83 - - - - - - - - - - -
Chloroform <2 ---- 12 ---- 991000 - - - - - - - - - - -
1,1,1-Trichloroethane <2 ---- 500 ---- Sat 5 - - - - 10 8 - - - -
1,1-Dichloropropene <3 ---- ---- ---- No criteria - - - - - - - - - - -
Carbon Tetrachloride <2 ---- 2 ---- No criteria - - - - - - - - - - -
1,2-Dichloroethane <2 2.25 3 ---- 7130 - - - - - - - - - - -
Benzene <0.5 0.75 1 ---- 243000 - - - - 1 - - - - - -
Trichloroethene <3 7.5 70, 10** 48.6 65300 65 47 28 - - 90 54 49 88 70 -
1,2-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 31300 - - - - - - - - - - -
Dibromomethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 7.9 - - - - - - - - - - -
Bromodichloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 15100 - - - - - - - - - - -
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- ---- No criteria - - - - - - - - - - -
Toluene <0.5 525 10 ---- Sat - - - - - 3 - - - - -
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- ---- No criteria - - - - - - - - - - -
1,1,2-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 388000 - - - - - - - - - - -
Tetrachloroethene <3 7.5 10, 40*** ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - -
1,3-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1 - - - - - - - - - - -
Dibromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - -
1,2-Dibromoethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1 - - - - - - - - - - -
Chlorobenzene <2 ---- 1 ---- 191000 - - - - - - - - - - -
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 257000 - - - - - - - - - - -
Ethyl Benzene <0.5 ---- 10 ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - -
m,p-Xylene <1 ---- 10**** ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - -
o-Xylene <0.5 ---- 10**** ---- Sat - - - 1 1 - - - - - -
Styrene <2 ---- ---- ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - -
Bromoform <2 ---- ---- ---- 2340000 - - - - - - - - - - -
Isopropylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat - - 13 - - - - - - - -
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <4 ---- ---- ---- 843000 - - - - - - - - - - -
Bromobenzene <2 ---- ---- ---- 198000 - - - - - - - - - - -
1,2,3-Trichloropropane <3 ---- ---- ---- 0.00065 - - - - - - - - - - -
Propylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - -
2-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - -
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 32200 - - - - - - - - - - -
4-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - -
tert-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- No criteria - - - - - - - - - - -
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 30300 - - - - - - - - - - -
sec-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat - - - - 5 - - - - - -
p-Isopropyltoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - -
1,3-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 35400 - - - - - - - - - - -
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - -
n-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat - - 31 - 3 - - - - - -
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- 10 ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - -
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1 - - - - - - - - - - -
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4***** ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - -
Hexachlorobutadiene <3 ---- 0.1 ---- 3840 - - - - - - - - - - -
Naphthalene <2 ---- 1 ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - -
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4***** ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - -
Notes:N/A - not analysed
Italics indicates result above GTV
- Indicates result below method detection limit, not specified.
Sat - indicates no GAC due to calculated saturation of the vapour pathway.
Volatile Organic CompoundsHuman Health
Commercial GAC
IGV - EPA Interim Guideline Value for the protection of groundwater
GTV
(µµµµg/L)
IGV
(µµµµg/L)
Controlled
Waters SSTL
MDLDeep Groundwater Monitoring Well
***Two IGVs are given for tetrachloroethene
SSTL = site specific target level
Indicates result above IGV
*****IGV is for the sum of trichlorobenzenes
**Two IGVs are given for trichloroetheneGAC - generic assessment criteria
****IGV is for the sum of xylenes
*IGV is for the sum of dichloroethenes
GTV - Groundwater Threshold Value, Statutory Instrument No. 9, 2010 and No. 366 of 2016.
MW16 MW17
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Updated by: EOH
Checked by: EOHTable 4 - Bedrock Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Results (µµµµg/L) 2016 - PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
Jun-15
Dichlorodifluoromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 190
MTBE <0.1 10 30 ---- Sat
Chloromethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 14800
Vinyl Chloride <0.1 0.375 ---- 2.25 741
Bromomethane <1 ---- ---- ---- 7
Chloroethane <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
Trichlorofluoromethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 230000
1,1-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* ---- 210000
Carbon Disulphide NA ---- ---- ---- 67200
Dichloromethane <3 15 10 ---- 20
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* ---- 197000
1,1-Dichloroethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 3200000
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* 130 147000
2,2-Dichloropropane <1 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
Bromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 83
Chloroform <2 ---- 12 ---- 991000
1,1,1-Trichloroethane <2 ---- 500 ---- Sat
1,1-Dichloropropene <3 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
Carbon Tetrachloride <2 ---- 2 ---- No criteria
1,2-Dichloroethane <2 2.25 3 ---- 7130
Benzene <0.5 0.75 1 ---- 243000
Trichloroethene <3 7.5 70, 10** 48.6 65300
1,2-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 31300
Dibromomethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 7.9
Bromodichloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 15100
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
Toluene <0.5 525 10 ---- Sat
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
1,1,2-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 388000
Tetrachloroethene <3 7.5 10, 40*** ---- Sat
1,3-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1
Dibromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,2-Dibromoethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1
Chlorobenzene <2 ---- 1 ---- 191000
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 257000
Ethyl Benzene <0.5 ---- 10 ---- Sat
m,p-Xylene <1 ---- 10**** ---- Sat
o-Xylene <0.5 ---- 10**** ---- Sat
Styrene <2 ---- ---- ---- Sat
Bromoform <2 ---- ---- ---- 2340000
Isopropylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <4 ---- ---- ---- 843000
Bromobenzene <2 ---- ---- ---- 198000
1,2,3-Trichloropropane <3 ---- ---- ---- 0.00065
Propylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
2-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 32200
4-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
tert-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 30300
sec-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
p-Isopropyltoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,3-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 35400
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
n-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- 10 ---- Sat
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4***** ---- Sat
Hexachlorobutadiene <3 ---- 0.1 ---- 3840
Naphthalene <2 ---- 1 ---- Sat
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4***** ---- Sat
Notes:N/A - not analysed
Italics indicates result above GTV
- Indicates result below method detection limit, not specified.
Sat - indicates no GAC due to calculated saturation of the vapour pathway.
Volatile Organic CompoundsHuman Health
Commercial GAC
GTV
(µµµµg/L)
IGV
(µµµµg/L)
Controlled
Waters SSTL
MDL
SSTL = site specific target level
GAC - generic assessment criteria
GTV - Groundwater Threshold Value, Statutory Instrument No. 9, 2010 and No. 366 of 2016.
Feb-12 Mar-13 Aug-14 Jun-15 Sep-16 Feb-12 Mar-13 Aug-14 Jun-15 Sep-16
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - 26 7 1 - 0.6
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - 4 - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - 207 49 - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - 16 - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - 10
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
Deep Groundwater Monitoring Well
MW19 MW20
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Updated by: EOH
Checked by: EOHTable 4 - Bedrock Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Results (µµµµg/L) 2016 - PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
Jun-15
Dichlorodifluoromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 190
MTBE <0.1 10 30 ---- Sat
Chloromethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 14800
Vinyl Chloride <0.1 0.375 ---- 2.25 741
Bromomethane <1 ---- ---- ---- 7
Chloroethane <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
Trichlorofluoromethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 230000
1,1-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* ---- 210000
Carbon Disulphide NA ---- ---- ---- 67200
Dichloromethane <3 15 10 ---- 20
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* ---- 197000
1,1-Dichloroethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 3200000
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* 130 147000
2,2-Dichloropropane <1 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
Bromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 83
Chloroform <2 ---- 12 ---- 991000
1,1,1-Trichloroethane <2 ---- 500 ---- Sat
1,1-Dichloropropene <3 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
Carbon Tetrachloride <2 ---- 2 ---- No criteria
1,2-Dichloroethane <2 2.25 3 ---- 7130
Benzene <0.5 0.75 1 ---- 243000
Trichloroethene <3 7.5 70, 10** 48.6 65300
1,2-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 31300
Dibromomethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 7.9
Bromodichloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 15100
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
Toluene <0.5 525 10 ---- Sat
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
1,1,2-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 388000
Tetrachloroethene <3 7.5 10, 40*** ---- Sat
1,3-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1
Dibromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,2-Dibromoethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1
Chlorobenzene <2 ---- 1 ---- 191000
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 257000
Ethyl Benzene <0.5 ---- 10 ---- Sat
m,p-Xylene <1 ---- 10**** ---- Sat
o-Xylene <0.5 ---- 10**** ---- Sat
Styrene <2 ---- ---- ---- Sat
Bromoform <2 ---- ---- ---- 2340000
Isopropylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <4 ---- ---- ---- 843000
Bromobenzene <2 ---- ---- ---- 198000
1,2,3-Trichloropropane <3 ---- ---- ---- 0.00065
Propylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
2-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 32200
4-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
tert-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 30300
sec-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
p-Isopropyltoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,3-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 35400
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
n-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- 10 ---- Sat
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4***** ---- Sat
Hexachlorobutadiene <3 ---- 0.1 ---- 3840
Naphthalene <2 ---- 1 ---- Sat
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4***** ---- Sat
Notes:N/A - not analysed
Italics indicates result above GTV
- Indicates result below method detection limit, not specified.
Sat - indicates no GAC due to calculated saturation of the vapour pathway.
Volatile Organic CompoundsHuman Health
Commercial GAC
GTV
(µµµµg/L)
IGV
(µµµµg/L)
Controlled
Waters SSTL
MDL
SSTL = site specific target level
GAC - generic assessment criteria
GTV - Groundwater Threshold Value, Statutory Instrument No. 9, 2010 and No. 366 of 2016.
Nov-97 Jul-98 Aug-98 Sep-98 Nov-98 Nov-98 Jan-99 Dec-02 Jan-04 Jun-04 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Feb-12 Mar-13 Aug-14 Jun-15 Sep-16
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - NA - NA - - - 7 - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
31 - 72 - 34 - - 28 21 16 30 - 24 22 52 24 22 18 29
NA NA NA NA NA - NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA - NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
- 3 - - 7 - 10 - - 1 9 19 29 - 13 8 5 9 6
- 3 4 2 3 - 11 - 7 7 8 8 8 - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - NA NA NA NA NA
- - - - - - NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
6 5 6 3 6 - 9 - 3 2 3 - - - 6 4 4 5 4
- 2 2 2 2 - 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
4,300 2,400 3,900 2,300 4,700 3,500 4,700 8,482 4,771 4,598 4,515 5,502 5,693 3,340 3,423 2,249 2,814 2,227 1,576
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - NA - 2 2 1 - - - - - - - -
22 18 21 12 23 15 18 24 13 14 13 15 14 - 8 - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
310 280 330 220 320 330 470 792 518 482 610 569 457 403 176 139 113 187 130
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - 2 2 - - - 2 - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
IGV - EPA draft Interim Guideline Value for the protection of groundwater
*Draft IGV is for the sum of dichloroethenes
**Two Draft IGVs are given for trichloroethene
***Two Draft IGVs are given for tetrachloroethene
****Draft IGV is for the sum of xylenes*****Draft IGV is for the sum of trichlorobenzenes
Deep Groundwater Monitoring Well
PPI Well
Indicates result above IGV
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Updated by: EOH
Checked by: EOHTable 4 - Bedrock Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Results (µµµµg/L) 2016 - PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
Jun-15
Dichlorodifluoromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 190
MTBE <0.1 10 30 ---- Sat
Chloromethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 14800
Vinyl Chloride <0.1 0.375 ---- 2.25 741
Bromomethane <1 ---- ---- ---- 7
Chloroethane <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
Trichlorofluoromethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 230000
1,1-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* ---- 210000
Carbon Disulphide NA ---- ---- ---- 67200
Dichloromethane <3 15 10 ---- 20
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* ---- 197000
1,1-Dichloroethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 3200000
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* 130 147000
2,2-Dichloropropane <1 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
Bromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 83
Chloroform <2 ---- 12 ---- 991000
1,1,1-Trichloroethane <2 ---- 500 ---- Sat
1,1-Dichloropropene <3 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
Carbon Tetrachloride <2 ---- 2 ---- No criteria
1,2-Dichloroethane <2 2.25 3 ---- 7130
Benzene <0.5 0.75 1 ---- 243000
Trichloroethene <3 7.5 70, 10** 48.6 65300
1,2-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 31300
Dibromomethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 7.9
Bromodichloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 15100
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
Toluene <0.5 525 10 ---- Sat
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
1,1,2-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 388000
Tetrachloroethene <3 7.5 10, 40*** ---- Sat
1,3-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1
Dibromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,2-Dibromoethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1
Chlorobenzene <2 ---- 1 ---- 191000
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 257000
Ethyl Benzene <0.5 ---- 10 ---- Sat
m,p-Xylene <1 ---- 10**** ---- Sat
o-Xylene <0.5 ---- 10**** ---- Sat
Styrene <2 ---- ---- ---- Sat
Bromoform <2 ---- ---- ---- 2340000
Isopropylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <4 ---- ---- ---- 843000
Bromobenzene <2 ---- ---- ---- 198000
1,2,3-Trichloropropane <3 ---- ---- ---- 0.00065
Propylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
2-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 32200
4-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
tert-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 30300
sec-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
p-Isopropyltoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,3-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 35400
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
n-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- 10 ---- Sat
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4***** ---- Sat
Hexachlorobutadiene <3 ---- 0.1 ---- 3840
Naphthalene <2 ---- 1 ---- Sat
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4***** ---- Sat
Notes:N/A - not analysed
Italics indicates result above GTV
- Indicates result below method detection limit, not specified.
Sat - indicates no GAC due to calculated saturation of the vapour pathway.
Volatile Organic CompoundsHuman Health
Commercial GAC
GTV
(µµµµg/L)
IGV
(µµµµg/L)
Controlled
Waters SSTL
MDL
SSTL = site specific target level
GAC - generic assessment criteria
GTV - Groundwater Threshold Value, Statutory Instrument No. 9, 2010 and No. 366 of 2016.
Dec-08 Jul-11 Mar-13 Aug-14 Jun-15
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
8,600 8,050 5,802 3,675 3,342
- - - - -
- - NA NA NA
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - 7 - -
- 1 - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- 1 - - -
14 - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- 3 - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- 1 - - -
- - - - -
Down Gradient Deep Groundwater Monitoring Well
301
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Updated by: EOH
Checked by: EOHTable 4 - Bedrock Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Results (µµµµg/L) 2016 - PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
Jun-15
Dichlorodifluoromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 190
MTBE <0.1 10 30 ---- Sat
Chloromethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 14800
Vinyl Chloride <0.1 0.375 ---- 2.25 741
Bromomethane <1 ---- ---- ---- 7
Chloroethane <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
Trichlorofluoromethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 230000
1,1-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* ---- 210000
Carbon Disulphide NA ---- ---- ---- 67200
Dichloromethane <3 15 10 ---- 20
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* ---- 197000
1,1-Dichloroethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 3200000
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* 130 147000
2,2-Dichloropropane <1 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
Bromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 83
Chloroform <2 ---- 12 ---- 991000
1,1,1-Trichloroethane <2 ---- 500 ---- Sat
1,1-Dichloropropene <3 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
Carbon Tetrachloride <2 ---- 2 ---- No criteria
1,2-Dichloroethane <2 2.25 3 ---- 7130
Benzene <0.5 0.75 1 ---- 243000
Trichloroethene <3 7.5 70, 10** 48.6 65300
1,2-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 31300
Dibromomethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 7.9
Bromodichloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 15100
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
Toluene <0.5 525 10 ---- Sat
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
1,1,2-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 388000
Tetrachloroethene <3 7.5 10, 40*** ---- Sat
1,3-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1
Dibromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,2-Dibromoethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1
Chlorobenzene <2 ---- 1 ---- 191000
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 257000
Ethyl Benzene <0.5 ---- 10 ---- Sat
m,p-Xylene <1 ---- 10**** ---- Sat
o-Xylene <0.5 ---- 10**** ---- Sat
Styrene <2 ---- ---- ---- Sat
Bromoform <2 ---- ---- ---- 2340000
Isopropylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <4 ---- ---- ---- 843000
Bromobenzene <2 ---- ---- ---- 198000
1,2,3-Trichloropropane <3 ---- ---- ---- 0.00065
Propylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
2-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 32200
4-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
tert-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 30300
sec-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
p-Isopropyltoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,3-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 35400
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
n-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- 10 ---- Sat
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4***** ---- Sat
Hexachlorobutadiene <3 ---- 0.1 ---- 3840
Naphthalene <2 ---- 1 ---- Sat
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4***** ---- Sat
Notes:N/A - not analysed
Italics indicates result above GTV
- Indicates result below method detection limit, not specified.
Sat - indicates no GAC due to calculated saturation of the vapour pathway.
Volatile Organic CompoundsHuman Health
Commercial GAC
GTV
(µµµµg/L)
IGV
(µµµµg/L)
Controlled
Waters SSTL
MDL
SSTL = site specific target level
GAC - generic assessment criteria
GTV - Groundwater Threshold Value, Statutory Instrument No. 9, 2010 and No. 366 of 2016.
Nov-98 Nov-98 Jan-99 Dec-02 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Jun-11 Jul-11 Mar-13 Aug-14 Jun-15 Sep-16
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
371 268 435 2,737 142 3,946 5,610 3,118 4,685 4,550 3,228 2,402 2,144 1,711
- - - - - - <50 - - 2 - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - NA - NA NA NA NA
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- 2 2 2 - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
169 86 64 44 - 61 <50 36 19 26 11 17 16 14
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
145 29 22 50 - 82 <50 23 9 10 15 6 8 3
23 18 17 16 51 15 <50 - 11 12 8 - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
58 44 32 27 10 23 <50 18 10 20 7 7 9 8
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - 1 - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - 1 - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <100 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - -
Down Gradient Deep Groundwater Monitoring Well
404
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Updated by: EOH
Checked by: EOHTable 4 - Bedrock Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Results (µµµµg/L) 2016 - PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
Jun-15
Dichlorodifluoromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 190
MTBE <0.1 10 30 ---- Sat
Chloromethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 14800
Vinyl Chloride <0.1 0.375 ---- 2.25 741
Bromomethane <1 ---- ---- ---- 7
Chloroethane <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
Trichlorofluoromethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 230000
1,1-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* ---- 210000
Carbon Disulphide NA ---- ---- ---- 67200
Dichloromethane <3 15 10 ---- 20
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* ---- 197000
1,1-Dichloroethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 3200000
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* 130 147000
2,2-Dichloropropane <1 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
Bromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 83
Chloroform <2 ---- 12 ---- 991000
1,1,1-Trichloroethane <2 ---- 500 ---- Sat
1,1-Dichloropropene <3 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
Carbon Tetrachloride <2 ---- 2 ---- No criteria
1,2-Dichloroethane <2 2.25 3 ---- 7130
Benzene <0.5 0.75 1 ---- 243000
Trichloroethene <3 7.5 70, 10** 48.6 65300
1,2-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 31300
Dibromomethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 7.9
Bromodichloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 15100
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
Toluene <0.5 525 10 ---- Sat
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
1,1,2-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 388000
Tetrachloroethene <3 7.5 10, 40*** ---- Sat
1,3-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1
Dibromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,2-Dibromoethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1
Chlorobenzene <2 ---- 1 ---- 191000
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 257000
Ethyl Benzene <0.5 ---- 10 ---- Sat
m,p-Xylene <1 ---- 10**** ---- Sat
o-Xylene <0.5 ---- 10**** ---- Sat
Styrene <2 ---- ---- ---- Sat
Bromoform <2 ---- ---- ---- 2340000
Isopropylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <4 ---- ---- ---- 843000
Bromobenzene <2 ---- ---- ---- 198000
1,2,3-Trichloropropane <3 ---- ---- ---- 0.00065
Propylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
2-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 32200
4-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
tert-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 30300
sec-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
p-Isopropyltoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,3-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 35400
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
n-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- 10 ---- Sat
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4***** ---- Sat
Hexachlorobutadiene <3 ---- 0.1 ---- 3840
Naphthalene <2 ---- 1 ---- Sat
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4***** ---- Sat
Notes:N/A - not analysed
Italics indicates result above GTV
- Indicates result below method detection limit, not specified.
Sat - indicates no GAC due to calculated saturation of the vapour pathway.
Volatile Organic CompoundsHuman Health
Commercial GAC
GTV
(µµµµg/L)
IGV
(µµµµg/L)
Controlled
Waters SSTL
MDL
SSTL = site specific target level
GAC - generic assessment criteria
GTV - Groundwater Threshold Value, Statutory Instrument No. 9, 2010 and No. 366 of 2016.
Nov-98 Nov-98 Jan-99 Dec-04 Dec-08 Jul-11 Mar-13 Aug-14 Jun-15 Sep-16
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
521 163 631 89 99 146 59 132 105 120
- - - - - 8 4 9 10 10
- - - - - - NA NA NA NA
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - 9 4 10 12 12
- - 2 - - 3 - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - 2 - - 6 3 9 11 11
12 4 15 16 20 42 15 - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - 2 - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- 4 - 3 - 2 - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
501
Down Gradient Deep Groundwater Monitoring Well
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Updated by: EOH
Checked by: EOHTable 4 - Bedrock Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Results (µµµµg/L) 2016 - PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
Jun-15
Dichlorodifluoromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 190
MTBE <0.1 10 30 ---- Sat
Chloromethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 14800
Vinyl Chloride <0.1 0.375 ---- 2.25 741
Bromomethane <1 ---- ---- ---- 7
Chloroethane <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
Trichlorofluoromethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 230000
1,1-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* ---- 210000
Carbon Disulphide NA ---- ---- ---- 67200
Dichloromethane <3 15 10 ---- 20
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* ---- 197000
1,1-Dichloroethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 3200000
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* 130 147000
2,2-Dichloropropane <1 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
Bromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 83
Chloroform <2 ---- 12 ---- 991000
1,1,1-Trichloroethane <2 ---- 500 ---- Sat
1,1-Dichloropropene <3 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
Carbon Tetrachloride <2 ---- 2 ---- No criteria
1,2-Dichloroethane <2 2.25 3 ---- 7130
Benzene <0.5 0.75 1 ---- 243000
Trichloroethene <3 7.5 70, 10** 48.6 65300
1,2-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 31300
Dibromomethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 7.9
Bromodichloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 15100
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
Toluene <0.5 525 10 ---- Sat
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
1,1,2-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 388000
Tetrachloroethene <3 7.5 10, 40*** ---- Sat
1,3-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1
Dibromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,2-Dibromoethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1
Chlorobenzene <2 ---- 1 ---- 191000
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 257000
Ethyl Benzene <0.5 ---- 10 ---- Sat
m,p-Xylene <1 ---- 10**** ---- Sat
o-Xylene <0.5 ---- 10**** ---- Sat
Styrene <2 ---- ---- ---- Sat
Bromoform <2 ---- ---- ---- 2340000
Isopropylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <4 ---- ---- ---- 843000
Bromobenzene <2 ---- ---- ---- 198000
1,2,3-Trichloropropane <3 ---- ---- ---- 0.00065
Propylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
2-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 32200
4-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
tert-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 30300
sec-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
p-Isopropyltoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,3-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 35400
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
n-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- 10 ---- Sat
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4***** ---- Sat
Hexachlorobutadiene <3 ---- 0.1 ---- 3840
Naphthalene <2 ---- 1 ---- Sat
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4***** ---- Sat
Notes:N/A - not analysed
Italics indicates result above GTV
- Indicates result below method detection limit, not specified.
Sat - indicates no GAC due to calculated saturation of the vapour pathway.
Volatile Organic CompoundsHuman Health
Commercial GAC
GTV
(µµµµg/L)
IGV
(µµµµg/L)
Controlled
Waters SSTL
MDL
SSTL = site specific target level
GAC - generic assessment criteria
GTV - Groundwater Threshold Value, Statutory Instrument No. 9, 2010 and No. 366 of 2016.
Nov-98 Nov-98 Jan-99 Dec-02 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Jul-11 Mar-13 Aug-14 Jun-15 Nov-16
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - 9 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
619 148 163 223 2,111 254 76 128 46 44 38 40 24
- - - - - - 20 7 15 12 13 13 7
- - - - - - - - - NA NA NA NA
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- 8 7 8 - 8 - 7 - - - - -
- - 2 - - - 5 - 5 5 4 5 -
- 3 3 - 31 5 3 - 2 - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- 2 2 2 62 - 3 - 3 3 - - -
41 47 41 44 11 39 74 29 43 15 - - 24
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
19 11 9 11 14 8 12 9 12 7 5 - 3
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
39 - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - 3 - - - - 3 - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
Down Gradient Deep Groundwater Monitoring Well
504
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:27
Updated by: EOH
Checked by: EOHTable 4 - Bedrock Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Results (µµµµg/L) 2016 - PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
Jun-15
Dichlorodifluoromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 190
MTBE <0.1 10 30 ---- Sat
Chloromethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 14800
Vinyl Chloride <0.1 0.375 ---- 2.25 741
Bromomethane <1 ---- ---- ---- 7
Chloroethane <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
Trichlorofluoromethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 230000
1,1-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* ---- 210000
Carbon Disulphide NA ---- ---- ---- 67200
Dichloromethane <3 15 10 ---- 20
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* ---- 197000
1,1-Dichloroethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 3200000
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30* 130 147000
2,2-Dichloropropane <1 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
Bromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 83
Chloroform <2 ---- 12 ---- 991000
1,1,1-Trichloroethane <2 ---- 500 ---- Sat
1,1-Dichloropropene <3 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
Carbon Tetrachloride <2 ---- 2 ---- No criteria
1,2-Dichloroethane <2 2.25 3 ---- 7130
Benzene <0.5 0.75 1 ---- 243000
Trichloroethene <3 7.5 70, 10** 48.6 65300
1,2-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 31300
Dibromomethane <3 ---- ---- ---- 7.9
Bromodichloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 15100
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
Toluene <0.5 525 10 ---- Sat
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
1,1,2-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 388000
Tetrachloroethene <3 7.5 10, 40*** ---- Sat
1,3-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1
Dibromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,2-Dibromoethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1
Chlorobenzene <2 ---- 1 ---- 191000
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <2 ---- ---- ---- 257000
Ethyl Benzene <0.5 ---- 10 ---- Sat
m,p-Xylene <1 ---- 10**** ---- Sat
o-Xylene <0.5 ---- 10**** ---- Sat
Styrene <2 ---- ---- ---- Sat
Bromoform <2 ---- ---- ---- 2340000
Isopropylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <4 ---- ---- ---- 843000
Bromobenzene <2 ---- ---- ---- 198000
1,2,3-Trichloropropane <3 ---- ---- ---- 0.00065
Propylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
2-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 32200
4-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
tert-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- No criteria
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 30300
sec-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
p-Isopropyltoluene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,3-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- 35400
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
n-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- ---- Sat
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- 10 ---- Sat
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2 ---- ---- ---- 0.1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4***** ---- Sat
Hexachlorobutadiene <3 ---- 0.1 ---- 3840
Naphthalene <2 ---- 1 ---- Sat
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4***** ---- Sat
Notes:N/A - not analysed
Italics indicates result above GTV
- Indicates result below method detection limit, not specified.
Sat - indicates no GAC due to calculated saturation of the vapour pathway.
Volatile Organic CompoundsHuman Health
Commercial GAC
GTV
(µµµµg/L)
IGV
(µµµµg/L)
Controlled
Waters SSTL
MDL
SSTL = site specific target level
GAC - generic assessment criteria
GTV - Groundwater Threshold Value, Statutory Instrument No. 9, 2010 and No. 366 of 2016.
Nov-98 Nov-98 Jan-99 Dec-02 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Jun-11 Mar-13 Aug-14 Jun-15 Sep-16
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
306 15 12 17 154 91 1,400 2,353 373 1,825 1,016 930
- - - - - - <10 - 3 - 3 -
- - - - - - <10 NA NA NA NA NA
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- 5 5 4 - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
20 78 57 46 52 32 89 47 61 49 47 37
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- 2 2 - - - 15 11 6 10 9 6
18 21 22 17 22 18 13 9 7 - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
19 32 27 24 22 14 40 18 19 18 19 13
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - 2 - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <20 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - -
Down Gradient Deep Groundwater Monitoring Well
505
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:28
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: EOHTable 5 - Redox and Biodegradation Indicator Results (mg/L) 2016 -
PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
MW16 MW17 MW19 MW20 PPI Well 404 501 504 505
Sulphate 0.05 200 187.5 1 21 35 2 15 23 17 21 22
Chloride 0.3 30 24 - 187.5 38 22 30 22 24 20 27 25 26
Nitrate (as NO3) 0.2 200 37.5 - 18 23 - 10 17 13 6 15
Nitrite (as NO2) 0.02 50 0.375 - - - - - - - - -
Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 1 nac ---- 310 188 128 232 142 140 112 206 158
Iron 0.02 0.20 ---- 12 - - 2.9 - - - 0.09 0.05
Manganese 0.002 0.05 ---- 18 - - 8.3 - - - 0.007 0.004
Note:
MDL: Method Detection Limit -: Indicates result below MDL
IGV: Draft Interim Guideline Value Bold Indicates result above IGV
GTV: Groundwater threshold value, SI No. 9 of 2010, Schedule 5 Italics indicates result above GTV
"----:IGV/GTV Not Defined nac: no abnormal change
Groundwater Monitoring Well
Note 1: IGV states no abnormal change for Alkalinity and give a
limit for Hardness (as CaCO3) of 200 mg/L
Parameter MDL Draft IGV GTV
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:28
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: EOHTable 6 - TPH Results (µµµµg/L) 2016 -
PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
MW16 MW17 MW19 MW20 PPI Well
Aliphatics
>C5-C6 5 nv nv 1,500 Sat - - - - -
>C6-C8 5 nv nv 1,500 Sat 25 86 - 17 521
>C8-C10 5 nv nv 300 Sat 163 - - 253 -
>C10-C12 5 nv nv 300 Sat 114,276 - - 67,258 -
>C12-C16 10 nv nv 300 Sat 614,860 - - 303,710 -
>C16-C21 10 nv nv 300 Sat 754,230 - - 363,100 -
>C21-C35 10 nv nv 300 Sat 319,950 - - 160,050 -
Total Aliphatics C5-35 10 nv nv nc nc 1,803,504 86 - 894,388 521
Aromatics
>C5-EC7 <5 nv nv 0.75 Sat - - - - -
>EC7-EC8 <5 nv nv 10 Sat - - - - -
>EC8-EC10 <5 nv nv 300 Sat - - - 6 -
>EC10-EC12 <5 nv nv 90 Sat 16,161 - - 8,958 -
>EC12-EC16 <10 nv nv 90 Sat 176,160 - - 97,230 -
>EC16-EC21 <10 nv nv 90 Sat 311,850 - - 197,110 -
>EC21-EC35 <10 nv nv 90 Sat 149,530 - - 105,270 -
Total Aromatics C5-35 <10 nv nv nc nc 653,701 - - 408,574 -
TPH <10 10 nv 10 nc 2,457,205 86 - 1,302,962 521
Notes:
MDL: Method Detection Limit
IGV: Interim Guideline Value
GTV: Groundwater threshold value, SI No. 9 of 2010, Schedule 5
nv: Draft IGV/GTV Not Defined
-: Indicates result below MDL
Bold Indicates result above IGV
Italics indicates result above GTV
Parameter MDL GTVGroundwater Monitoring Well
IGVControlled
Water GAC
Human Health
Commercial GAC
AECOM J:\Cork-Jobs\PPI Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 PPI GWMon 2016\Technical\PPI Tables 2016.xlsx
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:28
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Project Reference: 60518344
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Ppi Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 Ppi Gwmon 2016\Dms\Reports\60518344 Ppi Groundwater Monitoring 2016 Issue 2 Final.Docx
AECOM
Appendix A Laboratory Certificates
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:28
Unit 3 Deeside Point
Zone 3
Deeside Industrial Park
Deeside
AECOM
Attention :
Date :
Your reference :
Our reference :
Location :
Date samples received :
Status :
Issue :
Eight samples were received for analysis on 23rd September, 2016 of which eight were scheduled for analysis. Please find attached our Test
Report which should be read with notes at the end of the report and should include all sections if reproduced. Interpretations and opinions are
outside the scope of any accreditation, and all results relate only to samples supplied.
All analysis is carried out on as received samples and reported on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. Results are not surrogate corrected.
Simon Gomery BSc
Project Manager
30th September, 2016
60518344
PP1
23rd September, 2016
Final report
Compiled By:
Test Report 16/14797 Batch 1
1
Jones Environmental Laboratory
CH5 2UA
Tel: +44 (0) 1244 833780
Fax: +44 (0) 1244 833781
Edel O'Hannelly
4th Floor Adelphi Plaza
Adelphi Centre
Georges Street Upper
Dun Laoghaire, Co Dublin
Ireland
Registered Address : Unit 3 Deeside Point, Zone 3, Deeside Industrial Park, Deeside, CH5 2UA. UK
QF-PM 3.1.1 v16Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 1 of 8
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:28
Client Name: Report : Liquid
Reference:
Location:
Contact: Liquids/products: V=40ml vial, G=glass bottle, P=plastic bottle
JE Job No.: 16/14797 H=H2SO4, Z=ZnAc, N=NaOH, HN=HN03
J E Sample No. 1-11 12-22 23-33 34-44 45-55 56-66 67-77 78-88
Sample ID MW16 MW17 MW19 MW20 PP1 WELL 404 501 505
Depth
COC No / misc
Containers V HN HCL Z P G V HN HCL Z P G V HN HCL Z P G V HN HCL Z P G V HN HCL Z P G V HN HCL Z P G V HN HCL Z P G V HN HCL Z P G
Sample Date 20/09/2016 20/09/2016 20/09/2016 20/09/2016 20/09/2016 20/09/2016 20/09/2016 20/09/2016
Sample Type Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water
Batch Number 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Date of Receipt 23/09/2016 23/09/2016 23/09/2016 23/09/2016 23/09/2016 23/09/2016 23/09/2016 23/09/2016
Total Dissolved Iron # <20 <20 <20 2935 <20 <20 <20 50 <20 ug/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Manganese # <2 <2 <2 8267 <2 <2 <2 4 <2 ug/l TM30/PM14
Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether # <0.1 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - - <0.1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Benzene # <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - - <0.5 ug/l TM15/PM10
Toluene # <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 - - - <5 ug/l TM15/PM10
Ethylbenzene # <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - - <0.5 ug/l TM15/PM10
p/m-Xylene # <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 - - - <1 ug/l TM15/PM10
o-Xylene # <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - - <0.5 ug/l TM15/PM10
Surrogate Recovery Toluene D8 100 99 101 101 101 - - - <0 % TM15/PM10
Surrogate Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 102 101 102 95 103 - - - <0 % TM15/PM10
TPH CWG
Aliphatics
>C5-C6 # <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 - - - <5 ug/l TM36/PM12
>C6-C8 # <5 86 <5 17 521 - - - <5 ug/l TM36/PM12
>C8-C10 # <5 <5 <5 253 <5 - - - <5 ug/l TM36/PM12
>C10-C12 # <5 <5 <5 67258AB <5 - - - <5 ug/l TM5/PM30
>C12-C16 # <10 <10 <10 303710AB <10 - - - <10 ug/l TM5/PM30
>C16-C21 # <10 <10 <10 363100AB <10 - - - <10 ug/l TM5/PM30
>C21-C35 # <10 <10 <10 160050AB <10 - - - <10 ug/l TM5/PM30
Total aliphatics C5-35 # <10 86 <10 894388AB 521 - - - <10 ug/l TM5/TM36/PM30
Aromatics
>C5-EC7 # <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 - - - <5 ug/l TM36/PM12
>EC7-EC8 # <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 - - - <5 ug/l TM36/PM12
>EC8-EC10 # <5 <5 <5 6 <5 - - - <5 ug/l TM36/PM12
>EC10-EC12 # <5 <5 <5 8958AA <5 - - - <5 ug/l TM5/PM30
>EC12-EC16 # <10 <10 <10 97230AA <10 - - - <10 ug/l TM5/PM30
>EC16-EC21 # <10 <10 <10 197110AA <10 - - - <10 ug/l TM5/PM30
>EC21-EC35 # <10 <10 <10 105270AA <10 - - - <10 ug/l TM5/PM30
Total aromatics C5-35 # <10 <10 <10 408574AA <10 - - - <10 ug/l TM5/TM36/PM30
Total aliphatics and aromatics(C5-35) # <10 86 <10 1302962AA 521 - - - <10 ug/l TM5/TM36/PM30
Sulphate # 15.3 20.6 34.8 1.6 15.0 22.6 16.5 21.8 <0.5 mg/l TM38/PM0
Chloride # 13.5 21.7 29.6 22.0 24.3 20.4 27.1 25.5 <0.3 mg/l TM38/PM0
Nitrate as NO3 # 0.9 17.7 22.9 <0.2 9.7 16.7 12.9 14.5 <0.2 mg/l TM38/PM0
Nitrite as NO2 # <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 mg/l TM38/PM0
Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 # 898 188 128 232 142 140 112 158 <1 mg/l TM75/PM0
Redox 316.22 217.85 253.66 225.28 200.38 210.24 249.22 259.22 mV TM72/PM0
PP1
Edel O'Hannelly
Please see attached notes for all
abbreviations and acronyms
LOD/LOR UnitsMethod
No.
Jones Environmental Laboratory
AECOM
60518344
QF-PM 3.1.2 v11Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 2 of 8
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:28
Client Name: Report : Misc
Reference:
Location: Solids: V=60g VOC jar, J=250g glass jar, T=plastic tub
Contact:
JE Job No.: 16/14797
J E Sample No. 1-11
Sample ID MW16
Depth
COC No / misc
Containers V HN HCL Z P G
Sample Date 20/09/2016
Sample Type Ground Water
Batch Number 1
Date of Receipt 23/09/2016
Sample Temperature 6.0 <0.1 Degrees C NONE/NONE
PP1
Edel O'Hannelly
Please see attached notes for all
abbreviations and acronyms
LOD/LOR UnitsMethod
No.
Jones Environmental Laboratory
AECOM
60518344
QF-PM 3.1.2 v11Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 3 of 8
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:28
Client Name: VOC Report : Liquid
Reference:
Location:
Contact:
JE Job No.: 16/14797
J E Sample No. 1-11 12-22 23-33 34-44 45-55 56-66 67-77 78-88
Sample ID MW16 MW17 MW19 MW20 PP1 WELL 404 501 505
Depth
COC No / misc
Containers V HN HCL Z P G V HN HCL Z P G V HN HCL Z P G V HN HCL Z P G V HN HCL Z P G V HN HCL Z P G V HN HCL Z P G V HN HCL Z P G
Sample Date 20/09/2016 20/09/2016 20/09/2016 20/09/2016 20/09/2016 20/09/2016 20/09/2016 20/09/2016
Sample Type Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water
Batch Number 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Date of Receipt 23/09/2016 23/09/2016 23/09/2016 23/09/2016 23/09/2016 23/09/2016 23/09/2016 23/09/2016
VOC MS
Dichlorodifluoromethane <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether # <0.1 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Chloromethane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Vinyl Chloride # <0.1 0.5 <0.1 0.6 28.7 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromomethane <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Chloroethane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Trichlorofluoromethane # <3 12 <3 <3 6 1711AB 120 930 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1 DCE) # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 10 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Dichloromethane (DCM) # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
trans-1-2-Dichloroethene # <3 <3 <3 <3 4 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1-Dichloroethane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 12 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
cis-1-2-Dichloroethene # 4 228 <3 <3 1576AB 14 <3 37 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
2,2-Dichloropropane <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromochloromethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Chloroform # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 3 11 6 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1,1-Trichloroethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1-Dichloropropene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Carbon tetrachloride # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dichloroethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Benzene # <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ug/l TM15/PM10
Trichloroethene (TCE) # 5 70 <3 <3 130 8 <3 13 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dichloropropane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Dibromomethane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromodichloromethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
cis-1-3-Dichloropropene <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Toluene # <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 ug/l TM15/PM10
trans-1-3-Dichloropropene <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1,2-Trichloroethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,3-Dichloropropane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Dibromochloromethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dibromoethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Chlorobenzene # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Ethylbenzene # <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ug/l TM15/PM10
p/m-Xylene # <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 ug/l TM15/PM10
o-Xylene # <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ug/l TM15/PM10
Styrene <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromoform # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Isopropylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromobenzene # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2,3-Trichloropropane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Propylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
2-Chlorotoluene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
4-Chlorotoluene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
tert-Butylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
sec-Butylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 10 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
4-Isopropyltoluene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,3-Dichlorobenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,4-Dichlorobenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
n-Butylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dichlorobenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Hexachlorobutadiene <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Naphthalene <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Surrogate Recovery Toluene D8 100 99 101 101 101 100 101 102 <0 % TM15/PM10
Surrogate Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 102 101 102 95 103 102 102 101 <0 % TM15/PM10
PP1
Edel O'Hannelly
Please see attached notes for all
abbreviations and acronyms
LOD/LOR UnitsMethod
No.
Jones Environmental Laboratory
AECOM
60518344
QF-PM 3.1.4 v11Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 4 of 8
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:28
Notification of Deviating Samples
J E
Job
No.
Batch Depth J E Sample
No.Analysis Reason
Please note that only samples that are deviating are mentioned in this report. If no samples are listed it is because none were deviating.
Only analyses which are accredited are recorded as deviating if set criteria are not met.
Contact:
Sample ID
Client Name: AECOM
Reference:
Location:
No deviating sample report results for job 16/14797
Jones Environmental Laboratory
60518344
PP1
Edel O'Hannelly
QF-PM 3.1.11 v3 Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced 5 of 8
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:28
JE Job No.:
SOILS
DEVIATING SAMPLES
SURROGATES
DILUTIONS
NOTE
It is assumed that you have taken representative samples on site and require analysis on a representative subsample. Stones will generally be
included unless we are requested to remove them.
ISO17025 (UKAS) accreditation applies to surface water and groundwater and one other matrix which is analysis specific, any other liquids are
outside our scope of accreditation.
As surface waters require different sample preparation to groundwaters the laboratory must be informed of the water type when submitting samples.
Where appropriate please make sure that our detection limits are suitable for your needs, if they are not, please notify us immediately.
Surrogate compounds are added during the preparation process to monitor recovery of analytes. However low recovery in soils is often due to peat,
clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
limits for most organic methods are 70 - 130% and for VOCs are 50 - 150%. When surrogate recoveries are outside the performance criteria but
the associated AQC passes this is assumed to be due to matrix effect. Results are not surrogate corrected.
A dilution suffix indicates a dilution has been performed and the reported result takes this into account. No further calculation is required.
If you have not already done so, please send us a purchase order if this is required by your company.
NOTES TO ACCOMPANY ALL SCHEDULES AND REPORTS
Please note we are only MCERTS accredited (UK soils only) for sand, loam and clay and any other matrix is outside our scope of accreditation.
Where Mineral Oil or Fats, Oils and Grease is quoted, this refers to Total Aliphatics C10-C40.
16/14797
WATERS
Data is only reported if the laboratory is confident that the data is a true reflection of the samples analysed. Data is only reported as accredited when
all the requirements of our Quality System have been met. In certain circumstances where all the requirements of the Quality System have not been
met, for instance if the associated AQC has failed, the reason is fully investigated and documented. The sample data is then evaluated alongside
the other quality control checks performed during analysis to determine its suitability. Following this evaluation, provided the sample results have not
been effected, the data is reported but accreditation is removed. It is a UKAS requirement for data not reported as accredited to be considered
indicative only, but this does not mean the data is not valid.
Where possible, and if requested, samples will be re-extracted and a revised report issued with accredited results. Please do not hesitate to contact
the laboratory if further details are required of the circumstances which have led to the removal of accreditation.
Where an MCERTS report has been requested, you will be notified within 48 hours of any samples that have been identified as being outside our
MCERTS scope. As validation has been performed on clay, sand and loam, only samples that are predominantly these matrices, or combinations
of them will be within our MCERTS scope. If samples are not one of a combination of the above matrices they will not be marked as MCERTS
accredited.
Negative Neutralization Potential (NP) values are obtained when the volume of NaOH (0.1N) titrated (pH 8.3) is greater than the volume of HCl (1N)
to reduce the pH of the sample to 2.0 - 2.5. Any negative NP values are corrected to 0.
Where a CEN 10:1 ZERO Headspace VOC test has been carried out, a 10:1 ratio of water to wet (as received) soil has been used.
All samples will be discarded one month after the date of reporting, unless we are instructed to the contrary.
% Asbestos in Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) is determined by reference to HSG 264 The Survey Guide - Appendix 2 : ACMs in buildings
listed in order of ease of fibre release.
All analysis is reported on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. Results are not surrogate corrected. Samples are dried at 35°C ±5°C unless
otherwise stated. Moisture content for CEN Leachate tests are dried at 105°C ±5°C.
Where Mineral Oil or Fats, Oils and Grease is quoted, this refers to Total Aliphatics C10-C40.
Please note we are not a UK Drinking Water Inspectorate (DWI) Approved Laboratory .
Samples must be received in a condition appropriate to the requested analyses. All samples should be submitted to the laboratory in suitable
containers with sufficient ice packs to sustain an appropriate temperature for the requested analysis. If this is not the case you will be informed and
any test results that may be compromised highlighted on your deviating samples report.
QF-PM 3.1.9 v32Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 6 of 8
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:28
JE Job No.:
#
B
DR
M
NA
NAD
ND
NDP
SS
SV
W
+
++
*
AD
CO
LOD/LOR
ME
NFD
BS
LB
N
TB
OC
AA
AB
x5 Dilution
x10 Dilution
Samples are dried at 35°C ±5°C
Dilution required.
ABBREVIATIONS and ACRONYMS USED
Outside Calibration Range
No Fibres Detected
Result outside calibration range, results should be considered as indicative only and are not accredited.
Results expressed on as received basis.
Surrogate recovery outside performance criteria. This may be due to a matrix effect.
MCERTS accredited.
ISO17025 (UKAS) accredited - UK.
16/14797
AQC failure, accreditation has been removed from this result, if appropriate, see 'Note' on previous page.
Calibrated against a single substance
Not applicable
No Asbestos Detected.
No Determination Possible
Indicates analyte found in associated method blank.
None Detected (usually refers to VOC and/SVOC TICs).
Analysis subcontracted to a Jones Environmental approved laboratory.
Matrix Effect
Blank Sample
Client Sample
Trip Blank Sample
AQC Sample
Suspected carry over
Limit of Detection (Limit of Reporting) in line with ISO 17025 and MCERTS
QF-PM 3.1.9 v32Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 7 of 8
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:28
JE Job No: 16/14797
Test Method No. Description
Prep Method
No. (if
appropriate)
Description
ISO
17025
(UKAS)
MCERTS
(UK soils
only)
Analysis done
on As Received
(AR) or Dried
(AD)
Reported on
dry weight
basis
TM5Modified USEPA 8015B method for the determination of solvent Extractable Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (EPH) with carbon banding within the range C8-C40 GC-FID. PM30 Water samples are extracted with solvent using a magnetic stirrer to create a vortex. Yes
TM5/TM36
TM005: Modified USEPA 8015B. Determination of solvent Extractable Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (EPH) including column fractionation in the carbon range of C10-35 into
aliphatic and aromatic fractions by GC-FID.
TM036: Modified USEPA 8015B. Determination of Gasoline Range Organics (GRO) in
the carbon chain range of C5-10 by headspace GC-FID. Including determination of
BTEX and calculation of Aliphatic fractions.
PM30 Water samples are extracted with solvent using a magnetic stirrer to create a vortex. Yes
TM15Modified USEPA 8260. Quantitative Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOCs) by Headspace GC-MS.PM10
Modified US EPA method 5021. Preparation of solid and liquid samples for GC
headspace analysis.
TM15Modified USEPA 8260. Quantitative Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOCs) by Headspace GC-MS.PM10
Modified US EPA method 5021. Preparation of solid and liquid samples for GC
headspace analysis. Yes
TM30Determination of Trace Metal elements by ICP-OES (Inductively Coupled Plasma -
Optical Emission Spectrometry). Modified US EPA Method 200.7 and 6010BPM14
Analysis of waters and leachates for metals by ICP OES. Samples are filtered for
dissolved metals and acidified if required.Yes
TM36Modified US EPA method 8015B. Determination of Gasoline Range Organics (GRO) in
the carbon chain range of C4-12 by headspace GC-FID. PM12
Modified US EPA method 5021. Preparation of solid and liquid samples for GC
headspace analysis.Yes
TM38Soluble Ion analysis using the Thermo Aquakem Photometric Automatic Analyser.
Modified US EPA methods 325.2, 375.4, 365.2, 353.1, 354.1PM0 No preparation is required. Yes
TM72 Redox Potential is measured by HI98120 redox meter. PM0 No preparation is required.
TM75Modified US EPA method 310.1. Determination of Alkalinity by Metrohm automated
titration analyser.PM0 No preparation is required. Yes
NONE No Method Code NONE No Method Code
Jones Environmental Laboratory Method Code Appendix
QF-PM 3.1.10 v14 Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced 8 of 8
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:28
Unit 3 Deeside Point
Zone 3
Deeside Industrial Park
Deeside
AECOM
Attention :
Date :
Your reference :
Our reference :
Location :
Date samples received :
Status :
Issue :
Edel O'Hannelly
30th November, 2016
1
Exova Jones Environmental
CH5 2UA
Tel: +44 (0) 1244 833780
Fax: +44 (0) 1244 833781
4th Floor Adelphi Plaza
Adelphi Centre
Georges Street Upper
Dun Laoghaire, Co Dublin
Ireland
Registered Address : Exova (UK) Ltd, Lochend Industrial Estate, Newbridge, Midlothian, EH28 8PL
Two samples were received for analysis on 24th November, 2016 of which two were scheduled for analysis. Please find attached our Test Report
which should be read with notes at the end of the report and should include all sections if reproduced. Interpretations and opinions are outside the
scope of any accreditation, and all results relate only to samples supplied.
All analysis is carried out on as received samples and reported on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. Results are not surrogate corrected.
Paul Lee-Boden BSc
Project Manager
60518341
PPI
24th November, 2016
Final report
Compiled By:
Test Report 16/17586 Batch 1
QF-PM 3.1.1 v16Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 1 of 7
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:28
Client Name: Report : Liquid
Reference:
Location:
Contact: Liquids/products: V=40ml vial, G=glass bottle, P=plastic bottle
JE Job No.: 16/17586 H=H2SO4, Z=ZnAc, N=NaOH, HN=HN03
J E Sample No. 1-10 11-20
Sample ID 504 MW16
Depth
COC No / misc
Containers V HN HCL Z P G V HN HCL Z P G
Sample Date 22/11/2016 22/11/2016
Sample Type Ground Water Ground Water
Batch Number 1 1
Date of Receipt 24/11/2016 24/11/2016
Total Dissolved Iron # 86 12440AA <20 ug/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Manganese # 7 18290AA <2 ug/l TM30/PM14
Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether # - <0.1 <0.1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Benzene # - 0.6 <0.5 ug/l TM15/PM10
Toluene # - <5 <5 ug/l TM15/PM10
Ethylbenzene # - <0.5 <0.5 ug/l TM15/PM10
p/m-Xylene # - <1 <1 ug/l TM15/PM10
o-Xylene # - 1.4 <0.5 ug/l TM15/PM10
Surrogate Recovery Toluene D8 - 102 <0 % TM15/PM10
Surrogate Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene - 101 <0 % TM15/PM10
TPH CWG
Aliphatics
>C5-C6 # - <5 <5 ug/l TM36/PM12
>C6-C8 # - 25 <5 ug/l TM36/PM12
>C8-C10 # - 163 <5 ug/l TM36/PM12
>C10-C12 # - 114276AC <5 ug/l TM5/PM30
>C12-C16 # - 614860AC <10 ug/l TM5/PM30
>C16-C21 # - 754230AC <10 ug/l TM5/PM30
>C21-C35 # - 319950AC <10 ug/l TM5/PM30
Total aliphatics C5-35 # - 1803504AC <10 ug/l TM5/TM36/PM30/PM12
Aromatics
>C5-EC7 # - <5 <5 ug/l TM36/PM12
>EC7-EC8 # - <5 <5 ug/l TM36/PM12
>EC8-EC10 # - <5 <5 ug/l TM36/PM12
>EC10-EC12 # - 16161AB <5 ug/l TM5/PM30
>EC12-EC16 # - 176160AB <10 ug/l TM5/PM30
>EC16-EC21 # - 311850AB <10 ug/l TM5/PM30
>EC21-EC35 # - 149530AB <10 ug/l TM5/PM30
Total aromatics C5-35 # - 653701AB <10 ug/l TM5/TM36/PM30/PM12
Total aliphatics and aromatics(C5-35) # - 2457205AB <10 ug/l TM5/TM36/PM30/PM12
Sulphate # 21.2 0.6 <0.5 mg/l TM38/PM0
Chloride # 25.1 37.8 <0.3 mg/l TM38/PM0
Nitrate as NO3 # 5.9 <0.2 <0.2 mg/l TM38/PM0
Nitrite as NO2 # <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 mg/l TM38/PM0
Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 # 206 310 <1 mg/l TM75/PM0
PPI
Edel O'Hannelly
Please see attached notes for all
abbreviations and acronyms
LOD/LOR UnitsMethod
No.
Exova Jones Environmental
AECOM
60518341
QF-PM 3.1.2 v11Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 2 of 7
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:28
Client Name: VOC Report : Liquid
Reference:
Location:
Contact:
JE Job No.: 16/17586
J E Sample No. 1-10 11-20
Sample ID 504 MW16
Depth
COC No / misc
Containers V HN HCL Z P G V HN HCL Z P G
Sample Date 22/11/2016 22/11/2016
Sample Type Ground Water Ground Water
Batch Number 1 1
Date of Receipt 24/11/2016 24/11/2016
VOC MS
Dichlorodifluoromethane <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether # <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Chloromethane # <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Vinyl Chloride # <0.1 5.8 <0.1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromomethane <1 <1 <1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Chloroethane # <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Trichlorofluoromethane # 24 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1 DCE) # 7 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Dichloromethane (DCM) # <5 <5 <5 ug/l TM15/PM10
trans-1-2-Dichloroethene # <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1-Dichloroethane # <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
cis-1-2-Dichloroethene # <3 13 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
2,2-Dichloropropane <1 <1 <1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromochloromethane # <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Chloroform # <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1,1-Trichloroethane # 24 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1-Dichloropropene # <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Carbon tetrachloride # <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dichloroethane # <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Benzene # <0.5 0.6 <0.5 ug/l TM15/PM10
Trichloroethene (TCE) # 3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dichloropropane # <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Dibromomethane # <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromodichloromethane # <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
cis-1-3-Dichloropropene <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Toluene # <5 <5 <5 ug/l TM15/PM10
trans-1-3-Dichloropropene <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1,2-Trichloroethane # <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) # <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,3-Dichloropropane # <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Dibromochloromethane # <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dibromoethane # <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Chlorobenzene # <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane # <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Ethylbenzene # <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ug/l TM15/PM10
p/m-Xylene # <1 <1 <1 ug/l TM15/PM10
o-Xylene # <0.5 1.4 <0.5 ug/l TM15/PM10
Styrene <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromoform # <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Isopropylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <4 <4 <4 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromobenzene # <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2,3-Trichloropropane # <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Propylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
2-Chlorotoluene # <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
4-Chlorotoluene # <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
tert-Butylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
sec-Butylbenzene # <3 5 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
4-Isopropyltoluene # <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,3-Dichlorobenzene # <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,4-Dichlorobenzene # <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
n-Butylbenzene # <3 3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dichlorobenzene # <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Hexachlorobutadiene <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Naphthalene <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Surrogate Recovery Toluene D8 101 102 <0 % TM15/PM10
Surrogate Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99 101 <0 % TM15/PM10
PPI
Edel O'Hannelly
Please see attached notes for all
abbreviations and acronyms
LOD/LOR UnitsMethod
No.
Exova Jones Environmental
AECOM
60518341
QF-PM 3.1.4 v11Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 3 of 7
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:28
Notification of Deviating Samples
J E
Job
No.
Batch Depth J E Sample
No.Analysis Reason
Please note that only samples that are deviating are mentioned in this report. If no samples are listed it is because none were deviating.
Only analyses which are accredited are recorded as deviating if set criteria are not met.
Exova Jones Environmental
60518341
PPI
Edel O'HannellyContact:
Sample ID
Client Name: AECOM
Reference:
Location:
No deviating sample report results for job 16/17586
QF-PM 3.1.11 v3 Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced 4 of 7
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:28
JE Job No.:
SOILS
DEVIATING SAMPLES
SURROGATES
DILUTIONS
BLANKS
NOTE
Where Mineral Oil or Fats, Oils and Grease is quoted, this refers to Total Aliphatics C10-C40.
Please note we are not a UK Drinking Water Inspectorate (DWI) Approved Laboratory .
If you have not already done so, please send us a purchase order if this is required by your company.
Samples must be received in a condition appropriate to the requested analyses. All samples should be submitted to the laboratory in suitable
containers with sufficient ice packs to sustain an appropriate temperature for the requested analysis. If this is not the case you will be informed and
any test results that may be compromised highlighted on your deviating samples report.
ISO17025 accreditation applies to surface water and groundwater and usually one other matrix which is analysis specific, any other liquids are
outside our scope of accreditation.
As surface waters require different sample preparation to groundwaters the laboratory must be informed of the water type when submitting samples.
Where appropriate please make sure that our detection limits are suitable for your needs, if they are not, please notify us immediately.
Data is only reported if the laboratory is confident that the data is a true reflection of the samples analysed. Data is only reported as accredited when
all the requirements of our Quality System have been met. In certain circumstances where all the requirements of the Quality System have not been
met, for instance if the associated AQC has failed, the reason is fully investigated and documented. The sample data is then evaluated alongside
the other quality control checks performed during analysis to determine its suitability. Following this evaluation, provided the sample results have not
been effected, the data is reported but accreditation is removed. It is a UKAS requirement for data not reported as accredited to be considered
indicative only, but this does not mean the data is not valid.
Where possible, and if requested, samples will be re-extracted and a revised report issued with accredited results. Please do not hesitate to contact
the laboratory if further details are required of the circumstances which have led to the removal of accreditation.
Where an MCERTS report has been requested, you will be notified within 48 hours of any samples that have been identified as being outside our
MCERTS scope. As validation has been performed on clay, sand and loam, only samples that are predominantly these matrices, or combinations
of them will be within our MCERTS scope. If samples are not one of a combination of the above matrices they will not be marked as MCERTS
accredited.
Negative Neutralization Potential (NP) values are obtained when the volume of NaOH (0.1N) titrated (pH 8.3) is greater than the volume of HCl (1N)
to reduce the pH of the sample to 2.0 - 2.5. Any negative NP values are corrected to 0.
Where a CEN 10:1 ZERO Headspace VOC test has been carried out, a 10:1 ratio of water to wet (as received) soil has been used.
All samples will be discarded one month after the date of reporting, unless we are instructed to the contrary.
% Asbestos in Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) is determined by reference to HSG 264 The Survey Guide - Appendix 2 : ACMs in buildings
listed in order of ease of fibre release.
All analysis is reported on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. Results are not surrogate corrected. Samples are dried at 35°C ±5°C unless
otherwise stated. Moisture content for CEN Leachate tests are dried at 105°C ±5°C.
Surrogate compounds are added during the preparation process to monitor recovery of analytes. However low recovery in soils is often due to peat,
clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
limits for most organic methods are 70 - 130% and for VOCs are 50 - 150%. When surrogate recoveries are outside the performance criteria but
the associated AQC passes this is assumed to be due to matrix effect. Results are not surrogate corrected.
A dilution suffix indicates a dilution has been performed and the reported result takes this into account. No further calculation is required.
NOTES TO ACCOMPANY ALL SCHEDULES AND REPORTS
Please note we are only MCERTS accredited (UK soils only) for sand, loam and clay and any other matrix is outside our scope of accreditation.
Where Mineral Oil or Fats, Oils and Grease is quoted, this refers to Total Aliphatics C10-C40.
16/17586
WATERS
Where analytes have been found in the blank, the sample will be treated in accordance with our laboratory procedure for dealing with contaminated
blanks.
It is assumed that you have taken representative samples on site and require analysis on a representative subsample. Stones will generally be
included unless we are requested to remove them.
QF-PM 3.1.9 v33Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 5 of 7
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:28
JE Job No.:
#
SA
B
DR
M
NA
NAD
ND
NDP
SS
SV
W
+
++
*
AD
CO
LOD/LOR
ME
NFD
BS
LB
N
TB
OC
AA
AB
AC
x5 Dilution
x10 Dilution
x20 Dilution
Dilution required.
Analysis subcontracted to a Jones Environmental approved laboratory.
Matrix Effect
Blank Sample
Client Sample
Trip Blank Sample
AQC Sample
Suspected carry over
Limit of Detection (Limit of Reporting) in line with ISO 17025 and MCERTS
Samples are dried at 35°C ±5°C
16/17586
AQC failure, accreditation has been removed from this result, if appropriate, see 'Note' on previous page.
Calibrated against a single substance
Not applicable
No Asbestos Detected.
No Determination Possible
Indicates analyte found in associated method blank.
None Detected (usually refers to VOC and/SVOC TICs).
ISO17025 (SANAS) accredited - South Africa.
MCERTS accredited.
Outside Calibration Range
No Fibres Detected
Result outside calibration range, results should be considered as indicative only and are not accredited.
Results expressed on as received basis.
Surrogate recovery outside performance criteria. This may be due to a matrix effect.
ISO17025 (UKAS) accredited - UK.
ABBREVIATIONS and ACRONYMS USED
QF-PM 3.1.9 v33Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 6 of 7
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:28
JE Job No: 16/17586
Test Method No. Description
Prep Method
No. (if
appropriate)
Description
ISO
17025
(UKAS/S
ANAS)
MCERTS
(UK soils
only)
Analysis done
on As Received
(AR) or Dried
(AD)
Reported on
dry weight
basis
TM5Modified USEPA 8015B method for the determination of solvent Extractable Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (EPH) with carbon banding within the range C8-C40 GC-FID. PM30 Water samples are extracted with solvent using a magnetic stirrer to create a vortex. Yes
TM5/TM36
TM005: Modified USEPA 8015B. Determination of solvent Extractable Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (EPH) including column fractionation in the carbon range of C10-35 into
aliphatic and aromatic fractions by GC-FID.
TM036: Modified USEPA 8015B. Determination of Gasoline Range Organics (GRO) in
the carbon chain range of C5-10 by headspace GC-FID. Including determination of
BTEX and calculation of Aliphatic fractions.
PM30/PM12 CWG GC-FID Yes
TM15Modified USEPA 8260. Quantitative Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOCs) by Headspace GC-MS.PM10
Modified US EPA method 5021. Preparation of solid and liquid samples for GC
headspace analysis.
TM15Modified USEPA 8260. Quantitative Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOCs) by Headspace GC-MS.PM10
Modified US EPA method 5021. Preparation of solid and liquid samples for GC
headspace analysis. Yes
TM30Determination of Trace Metal elements by ICP-OES (Inductively Coupled Plasma -
Optical Emission Spectrometry). Modified US EPA Method 200.7 and 6010BPM14
Analysis of waters and leachates for metals by ICP OES. Samples are filtered for
dissolved metals and acidified if required.Yes
TM36Modified US EPA method 8015B. Determination of Gasoline Range Organics (GRO) in
the carbon chain range of C4-12 by headspace GC-FID. PM12
Modified US EPA method 5021. Preparation of solid and liquid samples for GC
headspace analysis.Yes
TM38Soluble Ion analysis using the Thermo Aquakem Photometric Automatic Analyser.
Modified US EPA methods 325.2, 375.4, 365.2, 353.1, 354.1PM0 No preparation is required. Yes
TM75Modified US EPA method 310.1. Determination of Alkalinity by Metrohm automated
titration analyser.PM0 No preparation is required. Yes
Exova Jones Environmental Method Code Appendix
QF-PM 3.1.10 v14 Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced 7 of 7
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:28
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2016
Project Reference: 60518344
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited J:\Cork-Jobs\Ppi Adhesive Products Ltd\60518344 Ppi Gwmon 2016\Dms\Reports\60518344 Ppi Groundwater Monitoring 2016 Issue 2 Final.Docx
AECOM
aecom.com
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-03-2017:03:10:28