Upload
rrdesai
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
If someone has to file opposition proceedings then the aggrieved person can file an opposition
in writing by way of opposition and the same is decided by the Controller after a hearing.
The aggrieved person can file a representation in the appropriate of
from the date of publication of the application or before the grant of patent whichever is later
and should include a statement and evidence, if any, in support of the representation and a
request for a hearing if so desired. The C
request for examination of the application has been filed. The Controller along with the
evidence submitted and the arguments at the hearing will consider the representation. The
Controller may reject the representation and grant the patent or accept the representation and
refuse the grant of patent within one month from the completion of the proceedings. If the
Controller thinks that the application for patent should be refused, he will give notice to
effect to the applicant for patent. On receiving the notice, the applicant should, if he so desires,
file his statement and evidence, if any in support of the application within one month from the
date of notice. On consideration of the statement and
refuse to grant a patent or require the specification to be amended before the patent if
granted. After considering the representation and submission made during the hearing, if so
requested, the Controller will proceed
granting the patent or accepting the representation and refusing the grant of the patent on that
application ordinarily within one month from the completion of above proceedings. An appeal
will lie against the order of the Controller to the Appellate Board.
In opposition proceedings the Controller has the power of a Civil Court in the matter of
summoning witnesses, requiring discovery and production of any document, receiving evidence
on affidavits, issuing commission for the examination of witnesses and documents, awarding
costs, reviewing his own decision, and setting aside an ex
An appeal against an order, decision or direction of the Controller in respect of an opposition
lies to Appellate Board. This would apply to any interlocutory order as well. A cross appeal is
necessary where a respondent desires to contest that the actual decision of the hearing officer
should be varied.
There are certain general powers of the Controller in
1. Public Interest-
though the opponent may fail, and costs may be given against him. He has discretion to
require at any stage, when the case comes before him, any amendment which he
considers necessary
and definite, and the claims clear and succinct. He will not allow a specification, which is
wider in scope than that to which the patentee is, on the evidence, entitled. The
Controller has the general power of preventing a fraud being committed upon the
public.
2. The Controller can go beyond the information provided by the opponent and avail
himself for the public benefit of the information of the Patent Office. He may in the
public interest consider any alleged prior publication, which may be brought to his
notice after the hearing and before the issue of the decision.
3. The Controller has power not to allow a patent to go forth to the public for an invention,
which upon the statements b
been substantially included in previous patents, even though the parties by an
arrangement have agreed to get rid of the opposition.
Powers of Patent Controller
If someone has to file opposition proceedings then the aggrieved person can file an opposition
in writing by way of opposition and the same is decided by the Controller after a hearing.
The aggrieved person can file a representation in the appropriate of
from the date of publication of the application or before the grant of patent whichever is later
and should include a statement and evidence, if any, in support of the representation and a
request for a hearing if so desired. The Controller will consider such representation only when a
request for examination of the application has been filed. The Controller along with the
evidence submitted and the arguments at the hearing will consider the representation. The
the representation and grant the patent or accept the representation and
refuse the grant of patent within one month from the completion of the proceedings. If the
Controller thinks that the application for patent should be refused, he will give notice to
effect to the applicant for patent. On receiving the notice, the applicant should, if he so desires,
file his statement and evidence, if any in support of the application within one month from the
date of notice. On consideration of the statement and evidence, the Controller may either
refuse to grant a patent or require the specification to be amended before the patent if
granted. After considering the representation and submission made during the hearing, if so
requested, the Controller will proceed further simultaneously rejecting the representation and
granting the patent or accepting the representation and refusing the grant of the patent on that
application ordinarily within one month from the completion of above proceedings. An appeal
gainst the order of the Controller to the Appellate Board.
In opposition proceedings the Controller has the power of a Civil Court in the matter of
summoning witnesses, requiring discovery and production of any document, receiving evidence
issuing commission for the examination of witnesses and documents, awarding
costs, reviewing his own decision, and setting aside an ex-parte order.
An appeal against an order, decision or direction of the Controller in respect of an opposition
ellate Board. This would apply to any interlocutory order as well. A cross appeal is
necessary where a respondent desires to contest that the actual decision of the hearing officer
There are certain general powers of the Controller in opposition proceedings
- The Controller has jurisdiction to act in the interests of the public even
though the opponent may fail, and costs may be given against him. He has discretion to
require at any stage, when the case comes before him, any amendment which he
considers necessary to prevent ambiguity, and make the description of the invention fair
and definite, and the claims clear and succinct. He will not allow a specification, which is
wider in scope than that to which the patentee is, on the evidence, entitled. The
as the general power of preventing a fraud being committed upon the
The Controller can go beyond the information provided by the opponent and avail
himself for the public benefit of the information of the Patent Office. He may in the
rest consider any alleged prior publication, which may be brought to his
notice after the hearing and before the issue of the decision.
The Controller has power not to allow a patent to go forth to the public for an invention,
which upon the statements before him and the specifications brought to his notice, has
been substantially included in previous patents, even though the parties by an
arrangement have agreed to get rid of the opposition.
Powers of Patent Controller
If someone has to file opposition proceedings then the aggrieved person can file an opposition
in writing by way of opposition and the same is decided by the Controller after a hearing.
The aggrieved person can file a representation in the appropriate office within three months
from the date of publication of the application or before the grant of patent whichever is later
and should include a statement and evidence, if any, in support of the representation and a
ontroller will consider such representation only when a
request for examination of the application has been filed. The Controller along with the
evidence submitted and the arguments at the hearing will consider the representation. The
the representation and grant the patent or accept the representation and
refuse the grant of patent within one month from the completion of the proceedings. If the
Controller thinks that the application for patent should be refused, he will give notice to that
effect to the applicant for patent. On receiving the notice, the applicant should, if he so desires,
file his statement and evidence, if any in support of the application within one month from the
evidence, the Controller may either
refuse to grant a patent or require the specification to be amended before the patent if
granted. After considering the representation and submission made during the hearing, if so
further simultaneously rejecting the representation and
granting the patent or accepting the representation and refusing the grant of the patent on that
application ordinarily within one month from the completion of above proceedings. An appeal
gainst the order of the Controller to the Appellate Board.
In opposition proceedings the Controller has the power of a Civil Court in the matter of
summoning witnesses, requiring discovery and production of any document, receiving evidence
issuing commission for the examination of witnesses and documents, awarding
parte order.
An appeal against an order, decision or direction of the Controller in respect of an opposition
ellate Board. This would apply to any interlocutory order as well. A cross appeal is
necessary where a respondent desires to contest that the actual decision of the hearing officer
opposition proceedings-
Controller has jurisdiction to act in the interests of the public even
though the opponent may fail, and costs may be given against him. He has discretion to
require at any stage, when the case comes before him, any amendment which he
to prevent ambiguity, and make the description of the invention fair
and definite, and the claims clear and succinct. He will not allow a specification, which is
wider in scope than that to which the patentee is, on the evidence, entitled. The
as the general power of preventing a fraud being committed upon the
The Controller can go beyond the information provided by the opponent and avail
himself for the public benefit of the information of the Patent Office. He may in the
rest consider any alleged prior publication, which may be brought to his
notice after the hearing and before the issue of the decision.
The Controller has power not to allow a patent to go forth to the public for an invention,
efore him and the specifications brought to his notice, has
been substantially included in previous patents, even though the parties by an
arrangement have agreed to get rid of the opposition.
Advocates & Legal ConsultantsAdvocates & Legal ConsultantsAdvocates & Legal ConsultantsAdvocates & Legal Consultants
If someone has to file opposition proceedings then the aggrieved person can file an opposition
fice within three months
from the date of publication of the application or before the grant of patent whichever is later
and should include a statement and evidence, if any, in support of the representation and a
ontroller will consider such representation only when a
request for examination of the application has been filed. The Controller along with the
evidence submitted and the arguments at the hearing will consider the representation. The
the representation and grant the patent or accept the representation and
refuse the grant of patent within one month from the completion of the proceedings. If the
that
effect to the applicant for patent. On receiving the notice, the applicant should, if he so desires,
file his statement and evidence, if any in support of the application within one month from the
evidence, the Controller may either
refuse to grant a patent or require the specification to be amended before the patent if
granted. After considering the representation and submission made during the hearing, if so
further simultaneously rejecting the representation and
granting the patent or accepting the representation and refusing the grant of the patent on that
application ordinarily within one month from the completion of above proceedings. An appeal
In opposition proceedings the Controller has the power of a Civil Court in the matter of
summoning witnesses, requiring discovery and production of any document, receiving evidence
issuing commission for the examination of witnesses and documents, awarding
An appeal against an order, decision or direction of the Controller in respect of an opposition
ellate Board. This would apply to any interlocutory order as well. A cross appeal is
necessary where a respondent desires to contest that the actual decision of the hearing officer
Controller has jurisdiction to act in the interests of the public even
though the opponent may fail, and costs may be given against him. He has discretion to
require at any stage, when the case comes before him, any amendment which he
to prevent ambiguity, and make the description of the invention fair
and definite, and the claims clear and succinct. He will not allow a specification, which is
wider in scope than that to which the patentee is, on the evidence, entitled. The
as the general power of preventing a fraud being committed upon the
The Controller can go beyond the information provided by the opponent and avail
himself for the public benefit of the information of the Patent Office. He may in the
rest consider any alleged prior publication, which may be brought to his
The Controller has power not to allow a patent to go forth to the public for an invention,
efore him and the specifications brought to his notice, has
been substantially included in previous patents, even though the parties by an
Advocates & Legal ConsultantsAdvocates & Legal ConsultantsAdvocates & Legal ConsultantsAdvocates & Legal Consultants
4. The Controller has power to refuse the grant of a patent upon an application which is
clearly in contravention of the provisions of the Act, whether any particular objection
was raised by the opponent or not.
5. After the expiration of the period prescribed for filing notice of opposition, the
Controller has power to give leave to an opponent to include specifications in his notice
of opposition not originally included therein. The Controller may allow new grounds of
objections to be added even at the appellate stage, so that meritorious inventions are
protected by patents and in the public interest.
6. The Controller may refuse grant where there is a clear admission by the applicant that
the invention disclosed and claimed in his specification had been used on a large scale in
the ordinary course of business without any obligation of secrecy, before the date of
application.
7. The Controller has the implied power to allow amendment of the specification in
opposition proceedings. The Controller may allow amendments which give the inventor
the benefit of any part of his invention which is novel, but amendments to protect as an
invention something not suggested as the subject-matter of the original claim will not
be allowed, except on the footing that the date of the acceptance of the amendments
should be substituted for the date of the original application.