2
If someone has to file in writing by way of op The aggrieved person from the date of publi and should include a request for a hearing i request for examinat evidence submitted a Controller may reject t refuse the grant of pa Controller thinks that effect to the applicant file his statement and date of notice. On co refuse to grant a pat granted. After conside requested, the Contro granting the patent or application ordinarily will lie against the orde In opposition proceed summoning witnesses on affidavits, issuing c costs, reviewing his ow An appeal against an lies to Appellate Boar necessary where a res should be varied. There are certain gene 1. Public Interest- though the opp require at any considers nece and definite, an wider in scope Controller has public. 2. The Controller himself for the public interest notice after the 3. The Controller which upon the been substant arrangement h Powers of Patent Contr opposition proceedings then the agg pposition and the same is decided by n can file a representation in the app ication of the application or before th statement and evidence, if any, in s if so desired. The Controller will consi tion of the application has been fi and the arguments at the hearing w the representation and grant the pate atent within one month from the co the application for patent should be t for patent. On receiving the notice, t evidence, if any in support of the ap onsideration of the statement and e tent or require the specification to ering the representation and submis oller will proceed further simultaneou r accepting the representation and ref within one month from the completi er of the Controller to the Appellate B dings the Controller has the power s, requiring discovery and production commission for the examination of w wn decision, and setting aside an ex-p order, decision or direction of the Co rd. This would apply to any interlocu spondent desires to contest that the eral powers of the Controller in oppos - The Controller has jurisdiction to ac ponent may fail, and costs may be giv y stage, when the case comes befo essary to prevent ambiguity, and make nd the claims clear and succinct. He w e than that to which the patentee the general power of preventing a r can go beyond the information p e public benefit of the information o t consider any alleged prior publica e hearing and before the issue of the has power not to allow a patent to go e statements before him and the spe tially included in previous patents have agreed to get rid of the oppositio roller grieved person can file an opposition the Controller after a hearing. propriate office within three months he grant of patent whichever is later support of the representation and a ider such representation only when a iled. The Controller along with the will consider the representation. The ent or accept the representation and ompletion of the proceedings. If the e refused, he will give notice to that the applicant should, if he so desires, pplication within one month from the evidence, the Controller may either o be amended before the patent if ssion made during the hearing, if so usly rejecting the representation and fusing the grant of the patent on that ion of above proceedings. An appeal Board. r of a Civil Court in the matter of of any document, receiving evidence witnesses and documents, awarding parte order. Controller in respect of an opposition utory order as well. A cross appeal is actual decision of the hearing officer sition proceedings- ct in the interests of the public even ven against him. He has discretion to ore him, any amendment which he e the description of the invention fair will not allow a specification, which is e is, on the evidence, entitled. The a fraud being committed upon the provided by the opponent and avail of the Patent Office. He may in the ation, which may be brought to his decision. o forth to the public for an invention, ecifications brought to his notice, has s, even though the parties by an on. Advocates & Lega Advocates & Lega Advocates & Lega Advocates & Lega n s r a a e e d e t , e r f o d t l f e g n s r n o e r s e e l e s , s n al Consultants al Consultants al Consultants al Consultants

Powers

  • Upload
    rrdesai

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Powers

If someone has to file opposition proceedings then the aggrieved person can file an opposition

in writing by way of opposition and the same is decided by the Controller after a hearing.

The aggrieved person can file a representation in the appropriate of

from the date of publication of the application or before the grant of patent whichever is later

and should include a statement and evidence, if any, in support of the representation and a

request for a hearing if so desired. The C

request for examination of the application has been filed. The Controller along with the

evidence submitted and the arguments at the hearing will consider the representation. The

Controller may reject the representation and grant the patent or accept the representation and

refuse the grant of patent within one month from the completion of the proceedings. If the

Controller thinks that the application for patent should be refused, he will give notice to

effect to the applicant for patent. On receiving the notice, the applicant should, if he so desires,

file his statement and evidence, if any in support of the application within one month from the

date of notice. On consideration of the statement and

refuse to grant a patent or require the specification to be amended before the patent if

granted. After considering the representation and submission made during the hearing, if so

requested, the Controller will proceed

granting the patent or accepting the representation and refusing the grant of the patent on that

application ordinarily within one month from the completion of above proceedings. An appeal

will lie against the order of the Controller to the Appellate Board.

In opposition proceedings the Controller has the power of a Civil Court in the matter of

summoning witnesses, requiring discovery and production of any document, receiving evidence

on affidavits, issuing commission for the examination of witnesses and documents, awarding

costs, reviewing his own decision, and setting aside an ex

An appeal against an order, decision or direction of the Controller in respect of an opposition

lies to Appellate Board. This would apply to any interlocutory order as well. A cross appeal is

necessary where a respondent desires to contest that the actual decision of the hearing officer

should be varied.

There are certain general powers of the Controller in

1. Public Interest-

though the opponent may fail, and costs may be given against him. He has discretion to

require at any stage, when the case comes before him, any amendment which he

considers necessary

and definite, and the claims clear and succinct. He will not allow a specification, which is

wider in scope than that to which the patentee is, on the evidence, entitled. The

Controller has the general power of preventing a fraud being committed upon the

public.

2. The Controller can go beyond the information provided by the opponent and avail

himself for the public benefit of the information of the Patent Office. He may in the

public interest consider any alleged prior publication, which may be brought to his

notice after the hearing and before the issue of the decision.

3. The Controller has power not to allow a patent to go forth to the public for an invention,

which upon the statements b

been substantially included in previous patents, even though the parties by an

arrangement have agreed to get rid of the opposition.

Powers of Patent Controller

If someone has to file opposition proceedings then the aggrieved person can file an opposition

in writing by way of opposition and the same is decided by the Controller after a hearing.

The aggrieved person can file a representation in the appropriate of

from the date of publication of the application or before the grant of patent whichever is later

and should include a statement and evidence, if any, in support of the representation and a

request for a hearing if so desired. The Controller will consider such representation only when a

request for examination of the application has been filed. The Controller along with the

evidence submitted and the arguments at the hearing will consider the representation. The

the representation and grant the patent or accept the representation and

refuse the grant of patent within one month from the completion of the proceedings. If the

Controller thinks that the application for patent should be refused, he will give notice to

effect to the applicant for patent. On receiving the notice, the applicant should, if he so desires,

file his statement and evidence, if any in support of the application within one month from the

date of notice. On consideration of the statement and evidence, the Controller may either

refuse to grant a patent or require the specification to be amended before the patent if

granted. After considering the representation and submission made during the hearing, if so

requested, the Controller will proceed further simultaneously rejecting the representation and

granting the patent or accepting the representation and refusing the grant of the patent on that

application ordinarily within one month from the completion of above proceedings. An appeal

gainst the order of the Controller to the Appellate Board.

In opposition proceedings the Controller has the power of a Civil Court in the matter of

summoning witnesses, requiring discovery and production of any document, receiving evidence

issuing commission for the examination of witnesses and documents, awarding

costs, reviewing his own decision, and setting aside an ex-parte order.

An appeal against an order, decision or direction of the Controller in respect of an opposition

ellate Board. This would apply to any interlocutory order as well. A cross appeal is

necessary where a respondent desires to contest that the actual decision of the hearing officer

There are certain general powers of the Controller in opposition proceedings

- The Controller has jurisdiction to act in the interests of the public even

though the opponent may fail, and costs may be given against him. He has discretion to

require at any stage, when the case comes before him, any amendment which he

considers necessary to prevent ambiguity, and make the description of the invention fair

and definite, and the claims clear and succinct. He will not allow a specification, which is

wider in scope than that to which the patentee is, on the evidence, entitled. The

as the general power of preventing a fraud being committed upon the

The Controller can go beyond the information provided by the opponent and avail

himself for the public benefit of the information of the Patent Office. He may in the

rest consider any alleged prior publication, which may be brought to his

notice after the hearing and before the issue of the decision.

The Controller has power not to allow a patent to go forth to the public for an invention,

which upon the statements before him and the specifications brought to his notice, has

been substantially included in previous patents, even though the parties by an

arrangement have agreed to get rid of the opposition.

Powers of Patent Controller

If someone has to file opposition proceedings then the aggrieved person can file an opposition

in writing by way of opposition and the same is decided by the Controller after a hearing.

The aggrieved person can file a representation in the appropriate office within three months

from the date of publication of the application or before the grant of patent whichever is later

and should include a statement and evidence, if any, in support of the representation and a

ontroller will consider such representation only when a

request for examination of the application has been filed. The Controller along with the

evidence submitted and the arguments at the hearing will consider the representation. The

the representation and grant the patent or accept the representation and

refuse the grant of patent within one month from the completion of the proceedings. If the

Controller thinks that the application for patent should be refused, he will give notice to that

effect to the applicant for patent. On receiving the notice, the applicant should, if he so desires,

file his statement and evidence, if any in support of the application within one month from the

evidence, the Controller may either

refuse to grant a patent or require the specification to be amended before the patent if

granted. After considering the representation and submission made during the hearing, if so

further simultaneously rejecting the representation and

granting the patent or accepting the representation and refusing the grant of the patent on that

application ordinarily within one month from the completion of above proceedings. An appeal

gainst the order of the Controller to the Appellate Board.

In opposition proceedings the Controller has the power of a Civil Court in the matter of

summoning witnesses, requiring discovery and production of any document, receiving evidence

issuing commission for the examination of witnesses and documents, awarding

parte order.

An appeal against an order, decision or direction of the Controller in respect of an opposition

ellate Board. This would apply to any interlocutory order as well. A cross appeal is

necessary where a respondent desires to contest that the actual decision of the hearing officer

opposition proceedings-

Controller has jurisdiction to act in the interests of the public even

though the opponent may fail, and costs may be given against him. He has discretion to

require at any stage, when the case comes before him, any amendment which he

to prevent ambiguity, and make the description of the invention fair

and definite, and the claims clear and succinct. He will not allow a specification, which is

wider in scope than that to which the patentee is, on the evidence, entitled. The

as the general power of preventing a fraud being committed upon the

The Controller can go beyond the information provided by the opponent and avail

himself for the public benefit of the information of the Patent Office. He may in the

rest consider any alleged prior publication, which may be brought to his

notice after the hearing and before the issue of the decision.

The Controller has power not to allow a patent to go forth to the public for an invention,

efore him and the specifications brought to his notice, has

been substantially included in previous patents, even though the parties by an

arrangement have agreed to get rid of the opposition.

Advocates & Legal ConsultantsAdvocates & Legal ConsultantsAdvocates & Legal ConsultantsAdvocates & Legal Consultants

If someone has to file opposition proceedings then the aggrieved person can file an opposition

fice within three months

from the date of publication of the application or before the grant of patent whichever is later

and should include a statement and evidence, if any, in support of the representation and a

ontroller will consider such representation only when a

request for examination of the application has been filed. The Controller along with the

evidence submitted and the arguments at the hearing will consider the representation. The

the representation and grant the patent or accept the representation and

refuse the grant of patent within one month from the completion of the proceedings. If the

that

effect to the applicant for patent. On receiving the notice, the applicant should, if he so desires,

file his statement and evidence, if any in support of the application within one month from the

evidence, the Controller may either

refuse to grant a patent or require the specification to be amended before the patent if

granted. After considering the representation and submission made during the hearing, if so

further simultaneously rejecting the representation and

granting the patent or accepting the representation and refusing the grant of the patent on that

application ordinarily within one month from the completion of above proceedings. An appeal

In opposition proceedings the Controller has the power of a Civil Court in the matter of

summoning witnesses, requiring discovery and production of any document, receiving evidence

issuing commission for the examination of witnesses and documents, awarding

An appeal against an order, decision or direction of the Controller in respect of an opposition

ellate Board. This would apply to any interlocutory order as well. A cross appeal is

necessary where a respondent desires to contest that the actual decision of the hearing officer

Controller has jurisdiction to act in the interests of the public even

though the opponent may fail, and costs may be given against him. He has discretion to

require at any stage, when the case comes before him, any amendment which he

to prevent ambiguity, and make the description of the invention fair

and definite, and the claims clear and succinct. He will not allow a specification, which is

wider in scope than that to which the patentee is, on the evidence, entitled. The

as the general power of preventing a fraud being committed upon the

The Controller can go beyond the information provided by the opponent and avail

himself for the public benefit of the information of the Patent Office. He may in the

rest consider any alleged prior publication, which may be brought to his

The Controller has power not to allow a patent to go forth to the public for an invention,

efore him and the specifications brought to his notice, has

been substantially included in previous patents, even though the parties by an

Advocates & Legal ConsultantsAdvocates & Legal ConsultantsAdvocates & Legal ConsultantsAdvocates & Legal Consultants

Page 2: Powers

4. The Controller has power to refuse the grant of a patent upon an application which is

clearly in contravention of the provisions of the Act, whether any particular objection

was raised by the opponent or not.

5. After the expiration of the period prescribed for filing notice of opposition, the

Controller has power to give leave to an opponent to include specifications in his notice

of opposition not originally included therein. The Controller may allow new grounds of

objections to be added even at the appellate stage, so that meritorious inventions are

protected by patents and in the public interest.

6. The Controller may refuse grant where there is a clear admission by the applicant that

the invention disclosed and claimed in his specification had been used on a large scale in

the ordinary course of business without any obligation of secrecy, before the date of

application.

7. The Controller has the implied power to allow amendment of the specification in

opposition proceedings. The Controller may allow amendments which give the inventor

the benefit of any part of his invention which is novel, but amendments to protect as an

invention something not suggested as the subject-matter of the original claim will not

be allowed, except on the footing that the date of the acceptance of the amendments

should be substituted for the date of the original application.