https://oag.ca.gov/ab953/board/reports

RIPARace and Hispanic Origin

White alone, percent 71.9%

Black or African American alone, percent(a)

6.5%

American Indian and Alaska Native alone, percent(a)

1.6%

Asian alone, percent(a) 15.5%

Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone, percent(a)

0.5%

Two or More Races, percent 4.0%

Hispanic or Latino, percent(b) 39.4%

White alone, not Hispanic or Latino, percent

36.5%

U.S. Census Bureau

*REFRESHER*

Previous Bills with Jan 1, 2021Implementation Date

CLETS: Immigration

Commencing July 1, 2021, all shall apply:

1) Any inquiry for information from CLETS other thancriminal history information submitted through thesystem shall include a reason for initiation of theinquiry.

2) Specifies that consistent with the California Values Act,CLETS shall not be used for purposes of immigrationviolations.

3) Provides that the AG may conduct investigations,including inspections and audits, as appropriate.

AB 1076 (Ting)Requires DOJ, starting January 1, 2021 to identify persons eligible for convictionrelief and if eligible, having their records withheld from public disclosure, andautomatically granted relief without a petition or motion being filed.

AB 339 (Irwin)Requires agencies to develop and adopt written policies and standards regarding use ofGVRO’s on or before January 1, 2021.

SB 338 (Hueso)Requires a LE agency that adopts or amends its policy regarding senior anddisability victimization after April 13, 2021 to include information and trainingon elder and dependent abuse.

SB 230 (Caballero)LAW ENFORCEMENT: USE OF DEADLY FORCE:

TRAINING: POLICIES

Requires law enforcement agencies to maintain a policy byJanuary 1, 2021 that provides guidelines on the use of force,utilizing de-escalation techniques and other alternatives to useof force, specific guidelines for the application of deadly force,and factors for evaluating and reviewing all use of forceincidents.

POLL QUESTION #1

2020 Bills Signed into Law by Governor Newsom

(take effect January 1, 2021 unless otherwise noted)

AB 904 (Chau)-Search Warrants: Tracking DevicesCODE: PC 1534

Now 1534 does not specifically authorize (but allows) the use of any device or software for the purpose of tracking the movement of a person or object.

A warrant is required to utilize remote tracking software on a phone to track physical movements.

WHY THE BILL?

According to the Author: “Penal Code Section 1534 currently requires search warrants prior to an officer 'installing atracking device or serving a warrant on a third-party possessor of the tracking data.' It is,however, no longer necessary for an officer to make physical contact with a device, person,or vehicle to 'install' a 'device' in order to track an individual.

p. 7

Provides that if a law enforcement agency utilizes software to track a person'smovements, whether in conjunction with a third party or by interacting directlywith a person's electronic device, the provisions for obtaining a tracking devicesearch warrant apply.

WHAT THIS BILL MEANS

In addition to PC 1534 requirements, agencies must continue to comply with the California Electronic Communications Privacy Act (CalECPA).

CalECPA = get a warrant for phone or online searches

In the case of emergency warrants, it does not appear to interfere with Missouri v. McNeely (2013) case law, where it clearly defines exigent situations where a warrant is not necessary.

p. 7AB 904 (Chau) (cont’d)

Makes certain findings and declarations relating to the impact of COVD-19 on victims of domestic violence.

Defines the term “disturbing thepeace of the other party” underFC Section 6320 as: conductthat, based on the totality of thecircumstances, destroys themental or emotional calm of theother party.

Conduct includes coercive control, examples of which are :

• Isolating the other party from friends,relatives, or other sources of support.

• Depriving the other party of basicnecessities.

• Controlling, regulating, or monitoringthe other party’s movements,communications, daily behavior,finances, economic resources, oraccess to services.

• Compelling the other party by force,threat of force, or intimidation,including threats based on actual orsuspected immigration status, toengage in conduct from which theother party has a right to abstain orto abstain from conduct in which theother party has a right to engage.

p. 13SB 1141 (Rubio)-Domestic violence: coercive controlCODES: FC 6320

WHAT THIS BILL MEANS:

In writing a police report, if an officer needs to articulate that a person is “disturbing thepeace” of a protected person based on the new criteria of “coercive control”, the officer willneed to articulate in the report that the offender unreasonably interfered with a protectedparty’s free will and personal liberty to interact with family, friends or household members.

p. 13SB 1141 (Rubio) (cont’d)

When officers are seeking a restraining order under the Domestic Violence Prevention Act,they should ask specific questions about the suspect’s actions. This bill elaborates on whatactions would “disturb the peace of the victim.” Officers should consider things such as:

• Did the suspect do anything to damage the mental or emotional well-being of thevictim?

• Did the suspect disturb the victim’s peace by using a third party or electronic form ofcommunication?

• Was the suspect coercive and controlling? Meaning did they isolate the victim fromfriends and family? Did they coerce the victim to do things they didn’t want to do or stopthem from doing things they did want to do? Did the suspect control the victim’sfinances, access to services or other resources?

If any of these actions are present, SB 1141 has clarified that such actions are potentiallygrounds for a restraining order.

p. 18AB 1458 (Quirk)CODE: B&P 26100

Requires, for edible cannabis products, the certificate of analysis to report that themilligrams (mg) of Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) per serving does not exceed 10 mgper serving, plus or minus 12% until January 1, 2022, and plus or minus 10% afterJanuary 1, 2022.

WHAT THIS BILL MEANS TO LAW ENFORCEMENTMay impact DRE responses to edible products.

Cannabis Testing

SB 1244 (Bradford)CODE: B&P 26104

p. 20

Authorizes a testing laboratory to receive samples of cannabis or cannabis productsfrom state or local law enforcement, or a prosecuting or regulatory agency in order totest the cannabis or cannabis products.

**Update**

AB 2077 (Ting)-Hypodermic needles and syringesCODES: B&P 4145.5, 4142, 4326 and HSC 11364 and 121285

p. 19

Decriminalizes specified conduct related toobtaining hypodermic needles or syringes andrepeals the Disease Prevention DemonstrationProject.

Extends the sunset, from January 1, 2021 to January 1, 2026, of an existing law that doesthe following:

o Permits pharmacists or physicians to furnish hypodermic needles and syringes for personal useby a person 18 years or older without a prescription or permit.

o Permits a person who is 18 years of age or older to obtain hypodermic needles and syringessolely for personal use, without a prescription or license, from a physician or pharmacist

o Requires a pharmacy or hypodermic needle and syringe exchange program to counselconsumers on one or more safe disposal options identified in the language of the bill.

Makes it a misdemeanor for a first responder, as defined, operating under colorof authority, to use an electronic device at the scene of an accident or crime tocapture the image of a deceased person for any purpose other than an officiallaw enforcement purpose or for a genuine public interest.

What this bill means to you:

Require an agency that employs first responders on January 1, 2021 to notify its employees who are first responders of the prohibition imposed by this bill.

AB 2655 (Gipson)-Invasion of privacy: first respondersCODES: PC 647.9 and 1524

p. 33

AB 846 (Burke)-Public employment: peace officersCODES: GC 1031 and PC 13561

p. 36

Requires that evaluations of peace officers include an evaluation of bias against race orethnicity, gender, nationality, religion, disability, or sexual orientation; also requires everydepartment or agency that employs peace officers to review their job descriptions anddeemphasize the paramilitary aspects of employment and place more emphasis oncommunity interaction and collaborative problem solving.

Requires, by January 1, 2022, for POST to study, review, and update regulations andscreening materials to identify explicit and implicit bias against race or ethnicity,gender, nationality, religion, disability, or sexual orientation related to emotional andmental condition evaluations.

Specifies that the recruitment provisions change is not intended to alter the requiredduties of any peace officer.

WHAT THIS BILL MEANS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT

Local law enforcement agencies shall review their job descriptions used to recruit and hire peace officers and shall make changes that emphasize community-based policing, familiarization between law enforcement and community residents, and collaborative problem solving, and de-emphasize the paramilitary aspects of the job.

SB 723 (Jones)- Firearms: prohibited personsCODES: PC 29800, 29805 and 29851

p. 43

Clarifies in both Penal Code sections that a person with an active arrest warrant fora prohibited (from firearms possession) offense must have knowledge of thewarrant in order to be criminally liable as a person prohibited from possessing afirearm.

WHAT THIS BILL MEANS TO YOU:

• The arresting officer must clearly state in their arrest report that thesuspect had knowledge of the warrant.

• Best Practice: Ask the subject if they knew they had a warrant for theirarrest and document what they said in the arrest report.

Why The Need for the Bill?

Author’s Statement: “A new section was recently added to the Penal Code specifying thatthe prohibition against a person with an outstanding warrant does not apply if the personlacked knowledge of the outstanding warrant. However, few practitioners are aware of theexistence of this exception because it was originally mis-numbered and placed in its ownsection of the Penal Code, then re-numbered through the annual Maintenance of the CodesBill but still separated from the section that prohibits possession

AB 2425 (Stone)- Juvenile police recordsCODE: WIC 786.5, 827, 872.95 and 828

Prohibits the release of information by a law enforcement, social worker, or probation agency when a juvenile has participated in or completed a diversion program.

What this bill means to you:WIC 786.5

The probation department shall notify the arresting law enforcement agency to seal the arrestrecords of a juvenile who participated in a diversion program.

The arresting law enforcement agency shall seal the records in its custody relating to the arrest nolater than 60 days from the date of notification by the probation department. Upon sealing, thearresting law enforcement agency shall notify the probation department that the records havebeen sealed.

WIC 827.95

The diversion service provider shall notify the referring law enforcement agency of a minor’ssatisfactory completion of a diversion program within 30 days of the minor’s satisfactorycompletion.

p. 51

SB 203 (Bradford)- Juveniles: custodial interrogationCODE: WIC 625.6

p. 54

Requires that prior to any custodial interrogation andbefore the waiver of any Miranda rights, a youth of15 17 years or younger must consult with legalcounsel in person, by telephone, or by videoconference. Prohibits the waiver of such consultation

Requires the court to consider a lack of consultation with legal counsel for the purposesof determining the admissibility of any statements made to law enforcement, as well asin determining the credibility of any officer who willfully failed to comply with the consultrequirement.

DOES NOT APPLY:

To the admissibility of statements of a youth 17 years of age or younger if both of thefollowing criteria are met:

(1) The officer believed the information sought was necessary to protect life orproperty from imminent threat.

(2) The officer’s questions were limited to those questions that were reasonablynecessary to obtain that information.

Probation officer’s duties (under Section 625, 627.5, or 628).

SB 823 (Budget Committee)- Juveniles: justice realignmentCODE: Various

Enacts public safety-related provisions of the Budget Act of 2020, including transferring theDivision of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) out of CDCR to county operations.

WIC Chapter 1.7 (Section 1990)

p. 55

Establishes a Juvenile Justice Realignment Block Grant program to provide county-based custody, care, and supervision of youth who are realigned from the Division ofJuvenile Justice or who would have otherwise been eligible for commitment to thedivision.

Starting in FY 2021-2022, annual funds to be allocated to a county who providesrehabilitative housing and supervision of juveniles formerly in CDCR custody, or whocommitted WIC 707 offenses or PC 290.008 (assault with sexual intent).

To be eligible for funding, a county shall create a subcommittee to develop a plandescribing the facilities, programs, placements, services, supervision and reentry strategiesthat are needed to provide appropriate rehabilitation and supervision services for thejuvenile population.

The subcommittee shall be composed of the chief probation officer, onerepresentative each from the DA’s office, the public defender’s office, thedepartment of social services, the department of mental health, the countyoffice of education or a school district, and a representative from the court.

SB 823 (cont’d) p. 55

WIC Chapter 5 (Section 2250)

Establishes a Regional Youth Programs and Facilities Grant program

$9.6M comes from General Fund in specified amounts for this effort

One-time grants

Grant applicants cannot enter into contracts with private prisons for adult or youthconfident.

“A local public agency that has responsibility for making arrests and detainingsuspects as its primary responsibility, or which is responsible for prosecutions, isineligible to apply for this grant.”

Impacts to you:

Law enforcement agencies must report receipt of filed petition in the manner prescribed by DOJ.

SB 118 (Budget Committee)-Public safety omnibus CODES: Various

p. 69

Expands the definition of an assault weapon to include a “semiautomatic firearm that is not a rifle, pistol,or shotgun, that does not have a fixed magazine, but that has any one of the following:

a. A pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon.b. A thumbhole stock.c. A folding or telescoping stock.d. A grenade launcher or flare launcher.e. A flash suppressor.f. A forward pistol grip.g. A threaded barrel, capable of accepting a flash suppressor, forward handgrip, or silencer.h. A second handgrip.i. A shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles, the barrel that allows the

bearer to fire the weapon without burning the bearer’s hand, except a slide that encloses thebarrel.

j. The capacity to accept a detachable magazine at some location outside of the pistol grip.

Also includes in ‘assault weapon’ definition, a semi autowith a fixed mag (w/ capacity for more than 10 rounds)with an overall length of less than 30 inches

SB 118 (Budget Committee)-Public safety omnibus (cont’d)

IMPACT:New definition of ‘semi-auto’

may impact local firearm taskforces or similar

operations looking for those types of weapons for

confiscation or transfer.

AB 2285Transportation

• Replaces “freeway” with “highway” for Slow Down, Move Over program

• Extends DMV’s alternate license plates and vehicle registration pilot program

p. 79

AB 2717Motor vehicles: unattended children: liability

p. 80

SB 909Hi-Lo Audible Warning

Sound

• Notify public of immediate need to evacuate

• CHP will develop regulations

p. 81

AB 1196 (Gipson)-Use of force: carotid restraintCODE: GC 7286.5(a)

Prohibits a law enforcement agency from authorizing the use of a carotid restraint hold or a choke hold as defined below.

"carotid restraint" = a vascular neck restraint or any similar restraint, hold, or other defensive tactic in which pressure is applied to the sides of a person's neck that involves a substantial risk of restricting blood flow and may render the person unconscious in order to subdue or control the person.

"choke hold" = any defensive tactic or force option in which direct pressure is applied to a person's trachea or windpipe.

p. 84

AB 1196 (Gipson) (cont’d)

WHAT THIS BILL MEANS TO YOU:

Agencies will decide if they are going to prohibit use of the carotid or leave itopen as a tool of opportunity (i.e. if it happens and is reasonably based on thetotality of the circumstances (PC 835a) the officer would be in compliancewith policy).

p. 84

POLL QUESTION #2

AB 1506 (McCarty)- Police use of forceCODES: GC 12525.3

p. 85

Beginning on July 1, 2023, the Attorney General shall operate aPolice Practices Division within DOJ to, upon request of a local lawenforcement agency, review the use of deadly force policies of thatlaw enforcement agency.

Specifies that the Police Practices Division shall make specificand customized recommendations to any law enforcementagency that requests a review, based on those policies identifiedas recommended best practices.

#1

#2

Beginning January 1, 2020, requires a state prosecutor toinvestigate incidents of an officer-involved shooting resulting in thedeath of an unarmed civilian, as defined (see next slide).

The bill would authorize the state prosecutor to prepare a writtenreport and would require the state prosecutor to post any reportsmade on a public internet website.

(1) “Deadly weapon” includes, but it not limited to, any loaded weapon fromwhich a shot, readily capable of producing death or other serious physicalinjury, may be discharged, or a switchblade knife, pilum ballistic knife, metalknuckle knife, dagger, billy, blackjack, plastic knuckles, or metal knuckles.

(2) “Unarmed civilian” includes anyone who is not in possession of a deadlyweapon.

(b) (1) A state prosecutor shall investigate incidents of officer-involved use offorce an officer-involved shooting resulting in the death of an unarmedcivilian. The Attorney General is the state prosecutor unless otherwise specifiedor named.

(2)The state prosecutor shall also conduct an investigation upon requestfrom a local law enforcement agency, district attorney, city council, or county orcity and county board of supervisors, on an incident involving the use of forceby a peace officer that resulted in the death of a civilian.

AB 1506 (McCarty) (cont’d)

GC 12525.3

p. 85

AB 1506 (McCarty) (cont’d) p. 85

According to the Author:

"In California over the past few months, there have been severalhigh-profile acts of deadly force at the hands of law enforcement.In a few incidents, there have been calls for independentinvestigations by the Attorney General. However, all of theserequests were denied by the CA Department of Justice.

Now more than ever there needs to be a uniform standard forlocal law enforcement officials and district attorneys to call forindependent investigations into police killings. Police shouldn'tpolice themselves, and the current system is fraught with conflictsof interest.”

AB 1506 (McCarty) (cont’d) p. 85

WHAT THIS BILL MEANS TO YOU:

Bypasses local investigatory processes, including establishedagreements to have outside agencies investigate officer-involved uses of force.

Additionally, it is unclear whether a state prosecutorinvestigation required or permitted by this bill would take theplace of, or be in addition to, a local investigation.

Bills VetoedOr Failed

(but likely to come back in 2021)

SB 629 (McGuire D) Public peace: media access at a riot.PC 409.7.

(a) If peace officers close the immediate area surrounding any emergency field command post orestablish any other command post, police line, or rolling closure at a demonstration, march, protest, orrally where individuals are engaged in activity that is protected pursuant to the First Amendment to theUnited States Constitution or Article I of the California Constitution, the following requirements shallapply:

(1) A duly authorized representative of any news service, online news service, newspaper, or radioor television station or network may enter the closed areas described in this section.

(3) If the duly authorized representative is detained by a peace officer or other law enforcementofficer, that representative shall be permitted to contact a supervisory officer immediately for thepurpose of challenging the detention, unless circumstances make it impossible to do so.

(2) A peace officer or other law enforcement officer shall not intentionally assault, interfere with, or obstruct the duly authorized representative of any news service, online news service, newspaper, or radio or television station or network who is gathering, receiving, or processing information for communication to the public.

Duly authorized- a person who appears to be engaged in gathering, receiving, orprocessing information, who produces a business card, press badge, other similarcredential, or who is carrying professional broadcasting or recording equipment

CPOA POSITION: Oppose

SB 1220 (Umberg)- Peace and custodial officers: Brady list

Requires any law enforcement agencies to, annually on and after January 1, 2022, provide to each city,county, or state prosecuting agency within its jurisdiction, and upon request at any time to any city countyor state prosecuting agency, a list of names and badge numbers of officers employed by the agency inthe five years prior to providing the list who meet specified criteria, including officers who:

a) Have had sustained findings that they engaged in sexual assault involving a member of the public;

b) Have had sustained findings that they engaged in an act of dishonesty related to the reporting, investigation, orprosecution of a crime or misconduct, including but not limited to a sustained finding of perjury, falsestatements, filing false reports, destruction, falsifying or concealing of evidence;

c) Have had sustained findings for conduct of moral turpitude (as published in appellate court decisions);

d) Have had sustained findings for group bias;

e) Have been convicted of a crime of moral turpitude;

f) Who are facing currently pending criminal charges; or

g) Who are on probation for a criminal offense.

Requires a prosecuting agency, prior to placing an officer’s name on a Brady list, to notify the officer and provide theofficer an opportunity to present information to the prosecuting agency against the officer’s placement on the list. If thatprior notice cannot be provided consistently with the prosecutor’s discovery obligations, the prosecuting agency shallcomply with its discovery obligations, notify the officer as soon as practicable, and provide the officer an opportunity topresent information to the prosecuting agency favoring the officer’s removal from the list.

Specifies that this provision does not create a right to judicial or administrative review of the prosecuting agency’sdecision to place or retain a peace officer’s name on a Brady list.

AB 66 (Gonzalez) June 2020 version:

o Changed PC 832.14 (a) to prohibit agencies to disperse an assembly if there is norioting

o Prohibited agency usage of CN or CS gas

o Kinetic energy projectiles deployed at a riot scene “only be fired at specific targetwho presents a clear and imminent threat to themselves, officers, or other persons.”

July 2020 version:o Prohibited agency usage of CN or CS gas

o Kinetic energy projectiles to disperse an assembly, protest, or demonstration canonly be used under a series of (11) requirements

AB 1652 (Wicks)

GC 7286- Defined “kettling” or “corralling” to mean “using a police line toencircle, or substantially encircle, a speech, protest, or assembly that is notimplemented for the safety of those participating in the speech, protest, orassembly.”

Mandated that by January 1, 2021, agencies update their use of forcepolicies to include clear and specific guidelines for when officers may use‘kettling’ or ‘corralling.’

Officers who are found by a preponderance of the evidence, to haveintentionally violated prohibitions on using force on individuals engaged in,or press covering, a lawful assembly or protest.

Crowd control & response

SB 731 (Bradford)

o Reversed qualified immunity for peace officers

o Disqualified persons convicted of records falsification, bribery orperjury from gaining employment as a peace officer.

o Created a Peace Officer Standards Accountability Division withinPOST to investigate and prosecute proceedings against a peaceofficers’ certification.

o Makes all records related to the revocation of an officer’s certificationa public record and requires investigation records to be retained for30 years.

o “This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 832.7 of thePenal Code proposed by SB 775 to be operative only if this bill andSB 776 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.”

What proposed changes to PC 832.7 (personnel records)?

SB 776 (Skinner)Expands the categories of personnel records of peace officers and custodial officers that are subject todisclosure under the California Public Records Act (CPRA) and establishes civil penalties for untimelydisclosure.

PC 832.7(a)

Required, commencing July 1, 2021:

o disclosure of an incident involving use of force that resulted in death or GBI

o disclosure of an incident involving use of force to make a member of thepublic comply with an officer, force that is unreasonable, or excessive force.

o disclosure of sustained findings (by agency or oversight agency) involvingofficer dishonesty

o disclosure of sustained findings of incidents where officers engaged inconduct including verbal statements, writings, online posts, recordings, andgestures involving prejudice against person under protected classes (i.e.race, creed, national origin, gender identity, age, etc.).

o disclosure of records relating to sustained findings of unlawful arrests andunlawful searches.

SB 773 (Skinner)

Would have, starting June 1, 2021, reduced the membership on the State 911Advisory Board from two representatives of California Police Chiefs Association,California State Sheriffs’ Association and CalNENA to one rep per each group.

In addition to removing LE representatives, the bill would have added: One county public guardian

One county mental health professional

FROM THE BILL:

“It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would revise 911systems so when an incident involves an issue of mental health, homelessness,and public welfare, the calls are directed to the appropriate social servicesagency and not to law enforcement.”

NEW FOR 2021

• Assembly Select Committee on Police Reform (chaired by Asm. Mike Gipson (D-Gardena), author of ‘carotid’

• Asm. Kevin McCarty (D-Sacramento)

• Asm. Tom Lackey (R-Lancaster)

• Asm. Shirley Weber (D-San Diego)

From Assembly Democratic Caucus:“During the 2019-2020 Legislative Session, the California State Assemblyproactively started addressing the culture that allows and leads to policemisconduct; it also worked toward ending the systemic racism present in lawenforcement.”

On January 1, 2020, a new policy-making body was created -- the Committee on Revision of the Penal Code.

The Committee will study the California Penal Code and recommend statutory reforms to achieve the following improvements:

(1) Simplify and rationalize the substance of criminal law.(2) Simplify and rationalize criminal procedures.(3) Establish alternatives to incarceration that will aid in the rehabilitation of offenders.(4) Improve the system of parole and probation.

Committee on Review of Penal CodePriorities (March 2020)

• Diversion• Instead of trial, complete courses of treatment (which would

lead to case dismissal).

• Collaborative Courts• “Problem solving courts,” that offer treatment instead of

incarceration

• Restorative Justice• Works like civil mediation, where a victim, the offender(s) and

others harmed conference with a trained facilitator.

• Probation• Reduce probation terms and ensure probationers are not

incarcerated.

DOJ Law Enforcement Code TablesThe CA Police Chiefs & CA Sherriff’s Statewide Data Sharing Task Force continues to partnerwith the California - Department of Justice (CA DOJ) to develop and maintain a comprehensive setof statewide reference tables, including a CA Master Offense Codes Table that will contain all statelaws that represent a chargeable Infraction, Misdemeanor, and/or Felony.

CA DOJ has built a team who coordinate work with a volunteer taskforce comprised ofrepresentatives from Law Enforcement, CHP, District Attorneys and Judicial Council staff. Thetaskforce has been actively reviewing state laws and making recommendations to DOJ on thecontent of the statewide reference tables.”

Review of the Penal Code has been completed and the results of that work can be reviewed at:https://oag.ca.gov/law/code-tables

It is a goal of CA DOJ to have the new 2020 laws that go into effect January 1, 2021 be included inthe Master Offense Codes Table by early January 2021.

Unfortunately, COVID-19 protocols impacted the timeline of work planned for 2020, but a re-start isanticipated to begin January 2020.

For those interested in learning more, the Statewide Data Sharing Taskforce, Master OffenseCodes Subcommittee hosts a monthly update call. Contact Greg Park at Livermore PD(gpark@cityoflivermore.net) to be added to the meeting distribution list.

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

Legislative Tracking: www.leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

CA Crime Statistics: www.openjustice.doj.ca.gov

Criminal Justice Publications: www.lao.ca.gov

CPOA Advocacy: www.cpoa.org/advocacy

If only…

Shaun RundleDeputy Director, CPOA

Srundle@cpoa.org916-520-2248