Upload
medea
View
37
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Power of Rivalry: Economics of Competition and Profits. MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy. David J. Bryce. The Structure of Industries. Threat of new Entrants. Competitive Rivalry. Bargaining Power of Suppliers. Bargaining Power of Customers. Threat of Substitutes. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
David Bryce © 1996-2002Adapted from Baye © 2002
Power of Rivalry:Economics of Competition and Profits
MANEC 387MANEC 387Economics of StrategyEconomics of Strategy
David J. Bryce
David Bryce © 1996-2002Adapted from Baye © 2002
The Structure of Industries
Competitive Rivalry
Threat of newEntrants
BargainingPower of
Customers
Threat ofSubstitutes
BargainingPower of Suppliers
From M. Porter, 1979, “How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy”
David Bryce © 1996-2002Adapted from Baye © 2002
The Threat of Rivalry• Rivalry is the threat that firms will
compete away profit margins. This occurs through– Price competition– Frequent introduction of new products– Intense advertising campaigns– Fast competitive response– Exit barriers
David Bryce © 1996-2002Adapted from Baye © 2002
Sources of Increasing Rivalry• Large number of competing firms of
similar size (unconcentrated)• Lack of product differentiation• Slow industry growth• Fixed costs are a significant fraction of
total costs• Productive capacity added in large
increments
David Bryce © 1996-2002Adapted from Baye © 2002
Market Structure and Performance
• The greatest threat to performance is for rivals to dissipate economic profits through price competition.
• Different market structures represent different levels of expected price competition:Market Structure Intensity of Price CompetitionPerfect competition FierceMonopolistic competition May be fierce or light depending on degree of product differentiationOligopoly May be fierce or light depending on degree of interfirm rivalryMonopoly Light unless threatened by entry
David Bryce © 1996-2002Adapted from Baye © 2002
Maximizing Economic PerformanceOptimal Choice of Price and Output
• Firm chooses quantity to maximize profits which is the distance between revenue and costs.
• Optimization requires MR(Q) = MC(Q)
• Intuition: If MR>MC, one more unit of adds more revenue than it costs. Continue adding units until marginal benefit equals marginal cost.
Q*
Price/CostRevenueRevenue
CostCost
Quantity
David Bryce © 1996-2002Adapted from Baye © 2002
Marginal Cost and the Supply Curve
• Firm chooses quantity such that MR=MC
• Firm supply follows MC curve for all prices above marginal cost
• Supply curve defines quantities firm is willing to sell for a menu of prices.
MC(Q)=Supply CurveMC(Q)=Supply Curve
Quantity
Price
AC(Q)AC(Q)
David Bryce © 1996-2002Adapted from Baye © 2002
Perfect Competition• Characteristics of perfect competition
– Many sellers– Homogeneous product– Free entry and exit– Many, well-informed customers
• Ease of entry encourages price competition, pushing economic profits to zero– Logic: if firms will enter, increase supply,
and reduce prices until
David Bryce © 1996-2002Adapted from Baye © 2002
Perfect Competition• Product homogeneity creates infinitely
elastic demand and forces price competition– Logic: If the firm raises price, consumers can get
the same product for less from rivals, so sales fall to zero.
– Logic: If the firm lowers price, it gets all market demand but does so for lower price than it could
• The average firm is a “price taker” (P=MC) with no profits
• Some firms may still earn economic profits/rents
David Bryce © 1996-2002Adapted from Baye © 2002
Why Learn if Assumptions are Unrealistic?• Many small businesses are “price-takers,”
and decision rules for such firms are similar to those of perfectly competitive firms
• It is a useful benchmark• Explains why governments oppose
monopolies• Illuminates the “danger” to managers of
competitive environments– Importance of product differentiation– Sustainable advantage
David Bryce © 1996-2002Adapted from Baye © 2002
Setting Price
Firm Qf
$
Df
Market QM
D
S
Pe
$
David Bryce © 1996-2002Adapted from Baye © 2002
$
Qf
ATC
AVC
MC
Qf*
ATC
Setting Output
Pe = Df = MR
Pe
Profit = (Pe - ATC) Qf*
David Bryce © 1996-2002Adapted from Baye © 2002
A Numerical Example• Demand and supply conditions
– P=$10 – C(Q) = 5 + Q2
• Optimal output– MR = P = $10 and MC = 2Q– 10 = 2Q– Q = 5 units
• Maximum profits– PQ - C(Q) = (10)(5) - (5 + 25) = $20
David Bryce © 1996-2002Adapted from Baye © 2002
Effect of Entry on Price
Firm Qf
$
Df
Market QM
$
D
S
Pe
Pe’ Df’
S’Entry
David Bryce © 1996-2002Adapted from Baye © 2002
Effect of Entry on the Firm’s Output and Profits
$
Q
ACMC
Pe Df
Pe’ Df’
QfQf’
David Bryce © 1996-2002Adapted from Baye © 2002
Summary of Logic of Perfect Competition
• Short run profits leads to entry• Entry increases market supply, drives
down the market price, increases the market quantity
• Demand for individual firm’s product shifts down
• Firm reduces output to maximize profit• Long run profits are zero
David Bryce © 1996-2002Adapted from Baye © 2002
Summary and Takeaways• Rivalry (especially price competition)
poses the greatest threat to performance and depends primarily on market structure.
• Perfect competition is the antithesis of strategy and compels us to seek out better structures.