Poverty and Social Analysis_Road JHURAI - SARAI

8/18/2019 Poverty and Social Analysis_Road JHURAI - SARAI

1/38

MADHYA PRADESH ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (MPRDC)

Government of Madhya Pradesh

IND: MADHYA PRADESH DISTRICT CONNECTIVITY SECTOR PROJECT

POVERTY AND SOCIAL ANALYSIS

January - 2016

Jhurai –Sarai Road

(Rewa Division)

Prepared by:

Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation forAsian development bank (ADB)


2/38

Poverty And Social Analysis Jhurai- Sarai Road

Prepared by Government of Madhya Pradesh through MPRDC ( i )

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 OVERVIEW................................................................................................................................. 1

2 THE PROJECT............................................................................................................................ 23 MADHYA PRADESH ............................................................................................................... 5

4 DEMOGRAPHICAL PROFILE OF THE DISTRICT .......................................................... 7

5 SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF PROJECT AREA....................................................... 10

6 SOCIAL ISSUES AND SOCIAL IMPACT.......................................................................... 13

7 GENDER SPECIFIC ISSUES................................................................................................. 16

8 HIV/AIDS ISSUES................................................................................................................... 18

9 PROJECT BENEFICIARIES AND BENEFIT...................................................................... 19

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix 1: Scan Copy of Attendance Sheet of FGD (Mixed Group) .......................................21

Appendix 2: Scan Copy of Attendance Sheet of FGD (Women Specific)...................................24

Appendix 3: Public Consultation Photographs .............................................................................27

Appendix 4: Details of Vulnerable Groups of Surveyed Families ..............................................28


3/38


Prepared by Government of Madhya Pradesh through MPRDC ( ii )

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB : Asian Development Bank

ADT : Average Daily Traffic

BPL : Below Poverty Line

CAGR : Compound Annual Growth Rate

CPS : Country Partnership Strategy

FYP : Five Year Plan

GDP : Gross Domestic Product

GDDP : Gross District Domestic ProductGSDP : Gross State Domestic Product

LFPR : Labor Force Participation Rate

MPHDR : Madhya Pradesh Human Development Resources

MPPWD : Madhya Pradesh Public Works Department

NSSO : National Sample Survey Organization

OBC : Other Backward Class

PCU : Passenger Car Unit

PHC : Primary Health Center

PHSC : Primary Health Sub Center

PSA : Poverty and Social Analysis

SC : Scheduled Caste

ST : Scheduled Tribe

WPR : Workers Participation Ratio


4/38


Prepared by Government of Madhya Pradesh through MPRDC Page - 1

1 OVERVIEW

1.1 Poverty and social analysis appears at the impacts of public policies, with particularemphasis on the poor and vulnerable. It uses ex-ante analysis, predicting impactsbefore a policy is implemented. This approach generates evidence to inform policydialogue, debate and decision-making.

1.2 This Poverty and Social Analysis (PSA) relates to part of Madhya Pradesh DistrictConnectivity Sector Project ( Jhurai-Sarai Road of Design length 31.500 km). TheMadhya Pradesh District Connectivity Sector Project is designed to improvetransport connectivity in the state by rehabilitating and upgrading major districtroads (MDRs). The Project constitutes (i) Rehabilitating and Upgrading MDRs; (ii)Improving road maintenance and asset management; and (iii) Developing anefficient accident response system.

1.3 Madhya Pradesh is amongst the poorest states in the country, and its per capitaincome is about 60% of the national average. Around 48.6% of the population isestimated to be living below poverty line with rural poverty ratio (53.6%) exceedingthe urban poverty ratio (35.1%) significantly (Ref. Tendulkar Committee Report2009). However, if factors beyond income are considered (Multidimensional PovertyIndex) about 68.1% of the state’s population is poor1. Human Development Index(HDI) of the state is 0.38 as against the 0.55 for the country. Madhya Pradesh isamongst the most food insecure states of the country and according to the India StateHunger Index, the state falls in the ‘extremely alarming’ category.

1.4 Calculation method of poverty line in Madhya Pradesh2: Defining “Poverty Line” isan important step in providing developmental assistance to the weaker sections ofthe society, especially in rural parts of a country. The methodologies of identifying“Below Poverty Line” (BPL) families have been evolving over the last few five yearplans. The latest model is a professional effort at including, in addition to “Roti(Bread), Kapda (Cloths) aur Makaan (Shelter)”, such other factors which affect thequality of life and long term potential of the families for up- liftment. It employs 13such factors and defines “scores” at five levels of each factor, from 0 to 4. But inactual practice, the existing model has been found to be effective only at the two

1 Source UNDP. http://www.undp.org/content/india/en/home/operations/about_undp/undp-in-mp/

2 Source http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/New-poverty-line-Rs-32-in-villages-Rs-47-in-cities/articleshow/37920441.cms

Below Poverty Line (BPL): is an economic benchmark and poverty threshold usedby the government of India to indicate economic disadvantage and to identifyindividuals and households in need of government assistance and aid. It isdetermined using various parameters which vary from state to state and within

states.

BPL Criteria as per Rangarajan Committee July 2014 -Those spending over Rs. 32a day in rural areas and Rs. 47 in towns and cities should not be considered poor,an expert panel headed by former RBI governor C Rangarajan said in a reportsubmitted to the BJP ruled central government in July’ 2014.

Based on the Suresh Tendulkar panel's recommendations in 2011-12, the povertyline had been fixed at Rs. 27 in rural areas and Rs. 33 in urban areas, levels atwhich getting two meals may be difficult.


5/38



extremes and fails to do justice to “marginal” families. In the state of MadhyaPradesh, Tendulkar method of Mixed Reference Period has been adopted. Accordingto this method, number and percentage of population Below Poverty Line (BPL) in2011 - 12 is as below:

Table 1: Number and Percentage of population Below Poverty Line in MP

MadhyaPradesh

Percentage Number of PersonsPoverty line in MP as per

Tendulkar method

Urban 21.00 43,10,000Rs. 897 monthly per

capita

Rural 35.74 190, 95, 000Rs. 771 monthly per

capitaSource: Annual Report of Reserve Bank of India, 2012

1.5 Madhya Pradesh has very poor indicators with respect to Gender. At 930 females per1,000 males, the state has a lower sex ratio as compared to the national average of940, which itself is low in international comparison. The state is among bottom five

in terms of women with Body Mass Index


6/38



Table 2: Sub-Project Area

Road Name Length (km)District(s)

ServedCD Block(s)

Served

Jhurai - Sarai 31.500 SingrauliDeosar &Singrauli

2.3 Present Road Location

The Project Road takes off from a T-intersection on NH-75E (Sidhi - Singrauli Road)at Jhurai village and ends at a T-Intersection on Sidhi - Waidhan Road about 4.0 kmbefore Sarai Village at Km 31+500. The project road provides connectivity to localagricultural farmers and other people with a main market place. The Sectiondescribing in this report is from jhurai- sarai (From km 0 to km 31.500 km Design)for a length of 31.500 km. The alignment is single lane having carriageway width of3.0m to 3.75m with fair to poor stretches in most of the lengths.

Fig-1: Location Map of the Project Road

2.4 Project Road Configuration

In most of the stretches the existing carriageway is single lane having flexiblepavement BT, though intermediate lane exists in some portions. Carriageway widthsare varying between 3.0 m to 3.5 m along the entire length of project road. Theexisting road has earthen shoulder of about 1m on either sides of the project road.The existing road passes through predominantly forest and agriculture lands andscattered rural settlements. The project road alignment mainly traverses through

plain, hilly and rolling terrain. The condition of the pavement is poor. The conditionof shoulders is also poor covered with vegetation. ROW available for the entire


7/38



project road varies from 10 to 15m. During detailed investigation it is observed thatElectric power supply line, Telephone line, and Electric lines were find at some placeand also crossing the project road at some locations. Shifting of utilities may berequired during improvement of project road.

2.5 Project Road Condition:

Pavement condition is fair to poor and existing pavement damaged and warped allalong the project road. BT has worn out at many places, especially during rainyseason and WBM base is exposed at some sections. Following are the key issuesrelated with present condition of the road:

• Transport cost is high, mobility has been decreased.

• Accidents at regular intervals on the Road.

• School dropout rate has increased;

• Health facilities are difficult to approach;

2.6 The road is an important connection between jhurai & sarai village. The trafficmostly travel on the road are 2-wheelers, 3-wheelers Car, 2-Axle Truck and LCV etc.other vehicles using the road are Local public transport (Private bus) or mostly theytake lifts with other commercial vehicles . Good drainage slope is available on eitherside of road. However no properly constructed drains are present on road sides. Theside drainage slopes and natural drain ways are all connected to intermediate nallasand water streams etc.

2.7 Traffic

Traffic survey has been carried out on the project corridor in order to identify presentand likely future problems and to device suitable remedial measures and to evolve

appropriate design method.

Classified traffic volume obtained during the traffic surveys were analyzed both interms of number of vehicles and Passenger Car Units (PCU’s). PCU factors wereadopted as per recommendations of Indian Road Congress (IRC: 64) and based onfactors used in other similar studies. Average Daily Traffic (ADT) at each countstations were derived as a simple average of seven day volumes and AnnualAverage Daily Traffic (AADT) has been worked out by applying the seasonalcorrection factor to the Average Daily Traffic and are shown in Table 3.

Table 3: Summary of ADT and AADT in Numbers

Vehicle Type Total FastMoving Vehicles

Total SlowMoving Vehicles

TotalAll Vehicles

(No.)

TotalAllVehicles

(PCU)

TotalToll ableTraffic(No.)

Count Stations

ADT (As per Primary Survey)

Km 1+000 403 17 420 458 -

AADT (With Seasonal Correction Factor)

Km 1+000 403 17 420 458 -Source: Traffic survey by DPR Consultant.


8/38



3 MADHYA PRADESH4

3.1 Demographical Profile of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh is the second largest state in terms of geographic extent, coveringan area of 308,244 sq. km. The state is administratively divided into 50 districts. As

per 2011 census, Madhya Pradesh has a population of 72 million accounting to 6percent of India’s population. The decadal population growth is 20.3 percent“between” 2001 - 2011. Population density of the state is 236 persons per squarekilometer and is significantly lower than the national average of 382 persons persquare kilometer. Further, distribution of population among the districts is unevenwith 21 districts registering population density of less than 200 persons per squarekilometer resulting in regions with relatively higher and lowers human capitalavailability. Majority of the state (around 72 percent) population still lives in ruralareas. However, there has been a steady growth in urbanization, with the emergenceof industrial clusters in the districts of Indore, Bhopal, and Gwalior as destinationsfor intra state migration.

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes constitute over a third of the totalpopulation. Scheduled Tribes form 20.63 percent of the total population as against8.20 percent at an all India level. There were 46 recognized Scheduled Tribes ofwhich three tribes have been classified as "Special Primitive Tribal Groups". Twentyone districts in the state including Mandla, Dhar, Jhabua, Sidhi, Khargone, Seoni,Shahdol and Chhindwara are identified as tribal districts in Madhya Pradesh. Thepercentage of Scheduled Caste population to the total population of the state is 13.14percent, which is lower than the all India average of 16.20 percent.

As per census 2011, the gender ratio of the state stands at 930 females per 1000 males.Gender ratio had constantly increased over the last three decades though it is still

lower than the current national average of 940. Tribal districts such as Dindori,Alirajpur, Mandla and Balaghat have more women than men, indicating the need toemphasize special focus on skilling of women in these areas. Madhya Pradeshprimarily being a rural economy, the role of women in capacity building cannot beundermined. The government is making concerted efforts towards a healthy genderratio in the state through various schemes such as Laxmi Ladli Yojana, JananiSuraksha Yojna, Gaon Ki Beti etc. Twenty six districts constituting 46.06 percent ofthe total population of Madhya Pradesh have a better gender ratio than the stateaverage. In 2011-12, primary sector contributed to one-fifth of the total GSDP whilecontribution from secondary sector had remained almost constant at a little less thanone third of the total economy between 2009-10 and 2011-12. Tertiary sector has

shown the maximum growth amongst the segments, with a contribution of 46.96percent in 2011-12.

3.5 Madhya Pradesh Economy5

The state economy’s GDP has registered a growth rate of 9.07 percent CAGRbetween 2006 and 2012(Advance Estimates), while the national GDP grew at 7.8percent during the same period. This indicates a gradual shift in the economy fromprimary to secondary and tertiary sectors. In 2011-12, the primary sector contributedto one fifth of the total GSDP, while contribution from the secondary sector hadremained almost constant at a little less than one third of the total economy between

4 Population Census of India, 2011.

5 District wise skill gap study for the state of MP, 2013 by National Skill Development Corporation.


9/38



2009-10 and 2011-12. Tertiary sector has shown the maximum growth amongst thesegments with a contribution of 46.96 percent in 2011-12.

While the state per capita income (Estimated at constant prices 2004-05 base) hasincreased from INR 17,013 to INR 24,132 between 2006-07 and 2011-12, it is still lowerthan the national level average of INR 38,005 during 2011-12. Per capita income atcurrent prices has grown at the rate of 7.29% and 12.04 % per annum for MadhyaPradesh and All India level respectively during 1999-2000 to 2009-10. In terms ofcontribution of individual districts to the overall state economy, urban districts ofIndore, Bhopal, and Jabalpur predominantly dominated by services sector accountfor a major share. Fifteen key districts in Madhya Pradesh contribute to about 55% ofthe total state economy.

3.8 Agriculture

Madhya Pradesh is predominantly an agrarian economy with Agriculture and allied

sectors such as, Horticulture, Animal Husbandry, Fisheries and Sericulture being thenucleus of the primary sector in the state. The state has greater dependence onagriculture, both from an economic as well as employment perspective. Between2006-07 and 2010-11, the sector’s contribution to GSDP at current prices grew at13.5%. While the absolute growth of the sector at current prices shows an increasingtrend, the rate of growth across different years has been highly fluctuating. Further,between 2006-07 and 2010-11, secondary and tertiary sectors grew at a higher pacethan agriculture - consequently, the relative contribution of agriculture sector to thestate economy, reduced from 23.85% to 20.93%.

3.9 Secondary Sector: Madhya Pradesh is endowed with rich mineral deposits and othernatural resources, providing tremendous potential for industrial growth. Secondarysector in the state grew at a compounded growth rate of 17.0930 percent between2006-07 and 2011-12, though its contribution to state GDP continued to remainalmost constant at around 29 percent during the same period.

3.10 Minerals Mining and Processing: Madhya Pradesh is one of the key mineralproduction states in India. The state has rich deposits of coal, limestone andmanganese and is also the only source of diamond mining in India. Bauxite, Copper,Dolomite, Fire Clay and Granite/Marble stones are the other mineral resourcesavailable in the state. Balaghat, Singrauli, Panna, Katni, Satna and Sagar are amongthe mineral rich districts of Madhya Pradesh. Presence of rich mineral base hasresulted in the growth of mineral based industries like cement, power, steel and

stone processing in the mineral clusters.3.11 Tertiary Sector: Tertiary sector is the largest contributor to the state economy,

contributing 46.94% to GSDP in 2011-12, with a 5 year CAGR of 17.36%. Keycomponents of tertiary sector include hospitality sector, ownership of dwelling,business services, banking and insurance and public administration.

3.12 Labor Force Distribution in the State

As per NSSO (National Sample Survey Organization) 66th Round EmploymentSurvey, Worker Participation Ratio (WPR) per 1000 persons in the 15-59 age groupbased on current daily status is 551 in comparison to the national average of 509. TheLabor Force Participation Rate (LFPR) per 1000 persons in the 15-59 age group basedon current daily status for rural Madhya Pradesh is 628 as compared to 471 in urbanregions. This significant difference arises from better participation of rural people in


10/38



agriculture. Though the participation rate in rural regions is high, seasonal nature ofagricultural work would mean underemployment for a significant section ofagricultural labor force in the state. Subsequently, Madhya Pradesh has a lowunemployment rate of 38 per 1000 persons in the 15-59 age group based on currentdaily status of 38 in comparison to the country’s average of 67.

Madhya Pradesh has 68.8 percent of its worker population involved in agricultureand allied activities as of 2004 indicating the agrarian nature of the state workforce.Around 16 percent of the worker population is involved in secondary and tertiaryactivities each, which are low in comparison to the country’s average of around 21percent for both. The distribution of workers in the secondary and tertiary sectors forboth the country and the state is dominated by the manufacturing, construction andtrade segments.

4 DEMOGRAPHICAL PROFILE OF THE DISTRICT

4.1 Singrauli district is a part Rewa Division, with the administrative headquarters atSingrauli town. It is bounded by U.P state to the north and east, Sidhi District to thewest, and Chhattisgarh state to the south and covers an area of 5675 square km. It hasa population of 11.78 lakhs as of 2011. Singrauli has a population density of 208 persquare km, which is lower than the state’s average (236 per square km). It witnesseda growth of 28.05% in population over the last decade. Gender ratio of the districtstands at 920 females per 1,000 male populations whereas child sex ratio (0-6 years) iscomparatively higher at 923 girls per 1,000 boys. Around 18% of the total populationis within 0-6 age group. Around 23 % of the population is under SC/ST categorywith 10.11% of the total population under SC category and 13.20% under STcategory.

Table-4 Demographical profile of the District

Particular Unit Singrauli

Total population No. 1,178,273

Males No. 613,637

Females No. 564,636

Sex Ratio (no. of females/males) per ‘000 920

Population Density per Sq Km 208

Population Growth Rate % 28.05

Level of Literacy % 60.41

Literacy Rate (Male) % 71.34

Literacy rate (Female) % 48.53

Total Child Population (0-6 Age) No 209,792

Male Population (0-6 Age) No 109,094

Female Population (0-6 Age) No 100,698

Child Proportion (0-6 Age) % 17.81

Child Sex Ratio (0-6 Age) (no. of females/ males) per ‘000 923

Scheduled Caste population % 10.11

Scheduled Tribe population % 13.20

4.2 According to the 2011 census Singrauli District has a population of 1,178,273.

Its population growth rate over the decade 2001-2011 was 28.05%. Singrauli has a sexratio of 920 females for every 1000 males, and a literacy rate of 60.41%.


11/38



4.3 Density 2011: The initial provisional data released by census India 2011, shows thatdensity of Singrauli district for 2011 is 208 people per sq. km whereas in 2001, densitywas at 162 people per sq. km.

4.4 Level of Literacy: As of 2011, literacy rate in the district (60.41 %) is below than thatof the state average of 70.63 percent. Around 35% of the total students are enrolledwith private schools, and they are playing a smaller role in the primary, secondaryand higher education when compared to Government schools in the district. Femaleliteracy rate (48.53%) is much lower that of male counterparts (71.34%). Intensiveefforts have been taken by the government to increase the education level of thedistrict through various programs under the Sarva Siksha Abhiyan. There is a needto improve education for women in the district. There has been decliningenrollments in class VIII when compared to lower classes, and many girls drop outfrom around that period. In terms of student enrollment, the year 2010-11 witnesseda peak with maximum enrollment.

4.5 Population Growth Rate: There was a decadal change of 28.05% in the population

compared to population as per 2001.4.6 Sex Ratio, 2011: With regards to Sex Ratio in Singrauli, it stood at 920 per 1000 male

compared to 2001 census figure of 922. The average national sex ratio in India is 940as per latest reports of Census 2011 Directorate.

4.7 Child Population, 2011: In census enumeration, data regarding child under 0-6 agewere also collected for Singrauli district. There were total 209,792 children under ageof 0-6 according to 2011 census. Child Sex Ratio as per census 2011 was 923.

4.8 District Economy

District economy registered a growth rate of 9.78 percent CAGR between 2003-04 and

2008-09 as against the state growth rate of 9.07% during the last five years.Contribution from primary and service sector is still significant when compared tosecondary sector. Primary sector contributes about 50% of the district economy whilegrowing at a 7.25 percent CAGR over the past 5 years. In absolute value terms,contribution from secondary sector had grown at a faster rate (16.13 percent). Therehas been a CAGR of 7.82 percent in per capita income. Per capita income haswitnessed a huge growth of 24.4 percent over the year from 2007-8 to 2008-9.

4.9 Agriculture and Allied Sector:

Agriculture has a predominant effect on the economy of the district. Between 2008 &09, net sown area remained almost 70%. Total forest cover is around 2.12% of the

total geographical area of the district. The district has deep black and shallow blackbrown and alluvial soils of the northern region. Channa and soya bean along withwheat, maize and jowar are the major crops of the district. Taking into account multicrop area, 76.59 % of the net sown area is under soya bean, and 37.1% under Channa,along with 19.96% in wheat. Around 45 percent of net sown area is irrigated.Government is promoting horticulture and food processing as well in the district bymany schemes. Some of the fruit crops include mango, oranges, sweet lime andAamla. Some of the vegetables include potato, tomato, lady’s finger and Kaddu.Spices include Coriander, Fenugreek seed along with garlic, onion and chilli. Flowersgrown in the district include marigold, mogra and rose.


12/38



4.11 Industry:

Coal is found in the district. Minerals resources like Lime, Bauxite, Flag Stone,Murumetc are available in the district. All major companies operating in Singrauliare giants of Indian energy industry. The operations of companies include mining ofcoal to power generation. In recent past, several private companies have also joinedthe league of companies operating in Singrauli. It is expected by 2017, that Singrauliwould feed around 35,000 MW of electrical power to the grid alone. Major companiesoperating or coming up at Singrauli are Singrauli Super Thermal Power Station,Vindhyachal Thermal Power Station, Rihand Thermal Power Station, NorthernCoalfields Limited etc.

The coal supplies from NCL has made it possible to produce more than 11000 MW ofelectricity from pithead power plants of National Thermal Power Corporation(NTPC), the region is now called the Energy Capital of India. The ultimate capacityof power generation of these power plants is 13295 MW and NCL is fully prepared tomeet the increased demand of coal for the purpose.

4.12 Service Sector:

Services sector has been the driver of the district economy with contribution of about37 percent to GDDP. The sector grew at 10.29 percent between 2003-04 and 2008-09,predominantly driven by Trade Hotels and Restaurants along with Real estate. TradeHotels and Restaurants as a service sector, constitutes 41 percent of the contributionfrom Tertiary sector. Some of the fast growing service sectors include real ownershipof dwellings (6.77 percent) and public administration (10.61 percent). Overallhealthcare reach at the district level is on par with state’s average. There are 4 civilhospitals and 1 district hospital. There is a further scope to improve the number ofhealth centers in the district. There are no urban heath post and civil dispensaries in

the district. The number of beds stands at 200. In the financial services space,between 2006-07 to 2010-11, bank branches in the district have increased from 65 to84, recording an 18.16 percent compounded growth in deposits. High growth rate inbank deposits is expected to further the growth of NBFCs in the district.

4.13 Workforce Distribution in the district

4.13.1 Current Employment Scenario in the district

Worker’s participation rate in the district (48.8 percent) is relatively higher than thestate average of 42.7 percent. Percentage of people employed as household industryworkers and other workers accounts to 24.4% of total working population -indicating very low level of employment generation through industries and services

sector in line with economic activity in the district. Worker participation is lowamongst women at 42 percent in comparison to male WPR at 55.1 percent, with thedisparity being more prominent in urban areas. Around 75.6 percent of the mainworking population is involved in agriculture either as cultivators or agriculturallabourers. 85.4 percent of the rural population is involved in agriculture. On theother hand, 75.3 percent of the urban working population is involved in otheractivities which includes service sector. This is lower than the state’s figure of 84% ofthe urban working population. This is the reason for high dependency ratio in urbanareas when compared to state’s average. Migration in the district is due to variousopportunities available outside the district. It is mainly driven by direct and indirectemployment opportunities in the surrounding districts. In the skilled and semi-skilled youth category, migration occurs either because certain educationopportunities do not exist in the home district, or because the youth see brighter


13/38



employment prospects outside. Dependency ratio is high and stands at 86.9 whencompared to state’s average of 84 per thousand population. Unemployment in thedistrict is 16.6 percent of the population, which is marginally greater than that ofMadhya Pradesh’s average of 16.4 percent. In the urban areas, 13.8 % of thepopulation in the age group of 15-59 is unemployed

4.14 Incremental Manpower Requirement in the District:

Incremental manpower requirement in the district has been estimated based onseveral parameters such as investments into various sectors in the district for the past5 years, national level benchmarks on industrial growth across sectors, nationalinclusion targets for sectors such as banking and healthcare, employment generationpotential of various sectors based on labour elasticity and market based insights fromdiscussions with industries in the district.

5 SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF PROJECT AREA

5.1 Poverty and social analysis survey was conducted in the month of January 2016covering the 21% sample households along the project road on questionnaire surveyformats. Following table shows profile of surveyed families.

Table 5: Profile of Surveyed Families

Sr.No.

Name of theVillage

No. ofVillage

H.H.

No. of HHsurveyed

SurveyedNumber of

family Member

AverageIncome

(Rs)

No. ofVulnerable

Groups

1. Kolhua 232 48 5-6 4500-5500 29

2. Purail 609 129 4-5 4500-5000 64

3. Godbahara 219 46 4-5 5000-6000 38

TOTAL 1060 223(21%) 131Source: Socioeconomic survey, January 2016 by CETESTEST

5.2 Total 223 households out of 1060 were selected as sample from villages along theproject area. During social survey 75 ST and 56 SC families have been identified. Castwise families covered in survey, 42.7% are SC families, 57.3% are ST families andremaining from OBC and General category. Average Household size in project areais 4-5 persons. Below table shows demographic profile of project area, covers villagewise male and Female, SC and ST population:

Table 6: Socio – Economic Profile of Project Area Villages

Sr.No.

Name of thevillage

BlockNo. of

HH

PopulationSC/ST

Population

Total Male Female SC ST

1. Kolhua Deosar 232 1351 685 666 8 643

2. Purail Deosar 609 2926 1506 1420 834 596

3. Godbahara Deosar 219 1029 499 530 133 678

Total 1060 5306 2690 2616 975 1917Source: Census of India 2011

5.3 There are 131 vulnerable families has been identified during socioeconomic survey.

These 131 families have been identified who belongs to SC and ST category thedetails are attached in Appendix 4. As per the Resettlement Policy Framework, these


14/38



vulnerable groups will be given priority in job opportunities during roadconstruction work. Following table shows profile of vulnerable families in the projectarea.

Table 7: Summary of Vulnerable Groups of Surveyed Families

Village Vulnerable FamiliesSC ST BPL WHH PH

Kolhua 3 26 - - -

Purail 37 27 - - -

Godbahara 16 22 - - -

Total 56 75 - - -Source: Socioeconomic survey, January 2016 by CETEST

Note: W H H: Women Headed Household, PH: Physically Handicapped, A E: Alone Elder

5.4 The Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe population in project area (rural) is mostlyengaged as agricultural and industrial labors or work under National Rural

Employment Guarantee schemes/ MGNREGA where ever available. These SC andST groups of project area have free social interactions with mainstream population.The SCs and STs from semi-urban area are engaged in other semi-skilled andunskilled jobs. It is very common in rural Madhya Pradesh that all communitiesincluding ST and SC together share their source of drinking water, infrastructuresand other belongings like community structures. As an impact of variousgovernment schemes, SC and ST groups are open to new ideas like girls education,family planning etc. Women from scheduled caste and scheduled tribes are moremobile than women of upper caste. Majority of SC and ST groups are below povertyline and depend on job opportunities in agricultural farms or under National RuralEmployment Guarantee Schemes. The wage rates; for unskilled manual labour is

ranging between Rs. 70 to 90 for women and Rs. 120 to 150 for men in agriculture.The wages under National Rural Employment Guarantee scheme is defined as perminimum wages Act. Since February 2016 (Notification on The Gazette of IndiaDated February 13, 2016) the minimum wages under this program is Rs. 157 for bothmen and women. The project area is dominated by OBC (Other Backward Class)which is politically, economically and socially strong.

5.5 Education and Literacy

Of the 223 households surveyed during the socio-economic survey, more than 50.7%of the respondents from the surveyed households comprised of illiterates. 62.3% ofthe respondents had studied upto primary levels and 37.7% of responded areeducated upto secondary school, 0% of responded are educated to graduation leveland only 0% of the respondents have completed their studies upto post-graduationlevel.

The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Emloyment Guarantee Act 2005 also known as the“Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act”, and abbreviated toMGNREGS, is an Indian labour law and social security measure that aims to guaranteethe “right to work’ and ensure livelihood security in rural areas by providing at least 100days of guaranteed wage employment in a financial year to every household whose adultmembers volunteer to unskilled manual work.


15/38



Table 8: Project Area Literacy Rate

Sr.No.

Name of theVillage

Block / District

TotalPopulation

Literacy Rate

Total Male Female

1. Kolhua Deosar 1351 590 354 236

2. Purail Deosar 2926 1329 784 5453. Godbahara Deosar 1029 471 245 226

Total5306

2690(50.7%)

1383(52%)

1007(48%)

Source: Census of India, 2012

5.6 As per the survey, 64% people are literate, whereas only 36% people are illiterate.Percentage of primary education is higher than any other level. The main reason isdropout rate of school children. Distance between village and higher schools,transport facilities are the main reasons of dropout. Below table clearly indicate thereis no any graduate and post-graduate people has to be find .

Table 9: Literacy and Education Profile of Surveyed Families

Name of theVillage

Sex Education Education level

T o t a l M a l e

T o t a l

F e m a l e

L i t e r a t e

I l l i t e r a t e

U P t o

P r i m a r y

U p t o

S e c o n d a r y

U p

G r a d u a t i o n

P o s t -

G r a d u a t i o n

Kolhua 168 120 131 157 93 38 - -

Purail 389 256 206 439 117 89 - -

Godbahara 141 89 111 119 69 42 - -

Grand Total 698 465 448 715 279 169 - -

Percentage 60% 40% 64% 36% 62.3% 37.7% 0% 0%Source: Socioeconomic survey, January 2016 by CETEST

5.7 There are 7 schools has been identified in the surveyed villages. Among them 4(57.1%) are Primary Schools and 2 (28.5%) are Middle Schools respectively followedby 1 (8.3%) High Schools and 1 (14.4%) is Higher Secondary School in the surveyedvillages respectively.

5.8 In project area, all the villages have primary school and middle school facility. Out of3 to 4 surveyed villages, 1 village has high school facilities.

Table 10: School Status of the surveyed villages along the project road

Village/ Block

PrimarySchool

MiddleSchool

HighSchool

HigherSecondary

SchoolTotal

Kolhua/ Deosar 1 1

Purail/ Deosar 1 1 2

Godbahara/ Deosar 1 1

Gannai/ Deosar 1 1 1 3

Grand Total 4 2 1 7Source: Socioeconomic survey, January 2016 by CETEST


16/38



6 SOCIAL ISSUES AND SOCIAL IMPACT

6.1 The project is a general intervention, as opposed to a targeted intervention thatspecifically addresses poverty reduction through interventions at the level ofhouseholds, specific services or geographical determinants of poverty. Consequently,project design need not include a poverty reduction strategy. It is expected that nostakeholders will experience long term negative impacts due to the project. Theimpact of short term disruptions and detours can be minimized through a carefullydesigned and implemented public information strategy that keeps people informedabout the location, duration and consequences of such disruptions and therebyenables them to schedule their activities to avoid bottlenecks and delays.

6.2 Information on Family Monthly Income & Expenditure:

Average household income of the surveyed families is Rs. 5500 per month. Incomefrom business/ Trade is Rs. 5000, from agriculture is Rs. 3000 and from pension andallowances is Rs. 4500 are reported. The families who are involved in service sectorget better earnings as Rs. 6000 and those working as agriculture / industrial labour

they get Rs 4500.

Table 11: Average Household Income and source profile

Source of income Amount (Rs)

Agriculture 3000

Livestock 1000

Salary 6000

Trade / Business 5000

Pension and allowance 4500Other / Agri. labor (if any) 4500 Average family income from all Sources 5500Source: Socioeconomic survey, January 2016 by CETEST

6.3 The Average monthly expenditure of a household is approximately Rs. 5200. Thehighest amount is spent on Food (54%) and the less amounts is spent onMedical/health care (female) (1.9%). Following table shows expenditure profile ofsurveyed families.

Table 12: Average Household Expenditure Profile

Item Expenditure (Rs.) per month

Food 2800Cooking fuel 200

Clothing 250

Health care 100

Lighting and utilities 250

Education 350

Transport 250

Social functions 200

Agriculture 400

Others 400

Total 5200Source: Socioeconomic survey, January 2016 by CETEST


17/38



6.4 Income Level Profile of Surveyed Families

As per the findings of the survey, 57.8% of the families have income between Rs.4500 to 5000 and 21.5% of the families have income between Rs. 3000 to 4500. 0%families have income more than Rs. 5000. The unavailability of road side markets arethe main reason of the lower level income.

Table 13: Poverty Level Profile

Income range in Rs. No. of Families PercentageLess than 3000 0 0%

Between 3000 to 4500 48 21.5%

Between 4500 to 5000 129 57.8%

Between 5000 to 6000 46 20.6%

More than 6000 0 0%

Total 223 100%Source: Socioeconomic survey, January 2016 by CETEST

6.5 Transport and Marketing Below table shows mode of transport, frequency and cost of road users during theirvisit to other places for various purpose. For employment and education purpose,the number of trips is high, whereas trips to district markets, health services,entertainment and social purposes are less. The cost of district place market is higherthan other trips. Most of the daily travellers use their own vehicle like two wheeler orcycle in case the distance is not much. Cost of visit to health centre in case travel toblock or district place is higher.

Table 14: Modes of Transport, Frequency of Visit and Cost

Trip Data

Number

of Visitsby familymembersper month

Mode / Type ofTransport

used

Time

spendfor one

trip(Hrs.)

Monthlycost (Rs)

Remarks

Block / DistrictMarket

1-3Public/Private

0.5 to 1Hrs.

250-350By Bus/Public

WageEmployment

20-22Walk /

Cycle/ PT1/2 to 1/3

Hrs.150-250

School / Collage 18-22Walk /

Cycle/ PT1/2 - 1/3

Hrs.-

By cycle orWalking

Health Services 1-2 Walk / PT 1/2 - 1 hr 80-100

Social Trips 1-3Walk / PT/Own vehicle

2-3 hr 150-200Depend onSituation

Entertainment 1-2Walk / PT/Own vehicle

1- 1.5 hr 200-220 -

PT: Public/private transport

Source: Socio-economic Survey, January 2016 by CETEST

6.6 Key Urban/ Admin Centres and Regional Markets: The improved road will beconnected with following urban / admin and regional markets and will improve theaccess:

People from project area will get connected to nearest market places & town andwill have business access from project area.


18/38



After construction of road the people will be connected to district place veryeasily.

6.7 Access to Health Facilities:

Primary Sub Health Centre (PSHC) service is available in all the surveyed villages.

Block places has Primary Health Centres Villagers from project area rely on the busservice to reach to health facilities at block and district level. Following is the healthservices profile of the project area.

Table 15: Health Services profile of project area

Sl.No.

Particular Kolhua Purail Gannai Godbhara

1 No of PHC in the Village 00 00 00 00

2 No of Sub PHC in the Village 01 01 01 01

3 No of Hospital in the village 00 00 00 00

4 No of ANM 00 00 01 00

5 No of MPW 00 00 00 00

6 Doctors 01 00 02 00Source: Socioeconomic survey, January 2016 by CETEST

6.8 Housing:

Majority surveyed families are staying in traditional houses (79.8%). Below tableprovides type of house structure in project area

Table 16: Types of Houses

Type of House Percentage (out of 21%sample survey)

Modern with proper roofing, brick walls andflooring

12

Semi modern with asbestos for roofing, brick andtick walls, cement flooring;

33

Traditional with local material 178Source: Socioeconomic survey, January 2016 by CETEST

6.9 Estimated number of jobs creation: it is difficult to estimate number of unskilled/semi–skilled/ skilled jobs creation for this road section but as per the followingfigures, total of 2170 main workers population (male and female), exists in the projectarea. Below table provides statistics of main worker population in project area.

Table 17: Main Worker Population in Project Area

Sr.No.

Name of the villageMain Workers

populationMale Female

1. Kolhua 477 335 142

2. Purail 1400 726 674

3. Godbahara 293 158 135

Total 2170 1219 951Source: Socioeconomic survey, January 2016 by CETEST


19/38



7 GENDER SPECIFIC ISSUES

7.1 During the FGD, the women members expressed their views, that construction ofroad will definitely ease the trouble, especially during the monsoon.

7.2 As per their view, better quality road will help students, especially girls to attend

schools. The bicycle journey to school will become comfortable for them.7.3 Improved road will increase women’s mobility, especially those who go for distance

unskilled jobs, local markets, block and district health centres etc.

7.4 Due to better road, visit of health staff, especially ANM and school teachers willincrease.

7.5 During socioeconomic survey, women specific Focus Group Discussion wasorganised in villages given in the following table

Table 18: Women Specific Focus Group Discussion profile

Village Name Date Block DistrictNo. of

Participants

Kolhua 07-01-16 Deosar 11

Purail 07-01-16 Deosar Singrauli 19

Godbahara 07-01-16 Deosar 12

Total 42Source: Socioeconomic survey, January 2016 by CETEST

7.6 Focus of women specific FGDs (Focussed Group Discussions) was mainly given onrole of men and women in various activities, time spend for each activity and incomegenerate from each activity. Following are the key results of FGD:

• Women’s contribution to the project area economy is very low because of underestimation of the role of women in various sectors of economy;

• There are differences in men’s and women’s pay, unequal access to stableemployment;

• Women are engaged in “hidden work” unpaid but economically necessary in thedomestic, agriculture and informal sectors.

7.7 Mode of Transport for women:

Table 19: Distance between Village and Market

Sr. No. Name of the villageLocation of

MarketDistance km Bus fare in Rs.

1 Kolhua Local 2.0-2.5 ---

2 Purail Local 7.0-7.5 5-10

3 Godbahara Local 3.0-4.0 5-10Source: Socioeconomic survey, January 2016 by CETEST


20/38



7.8 Followings are the key findings of above FGD:

Women of entire road stretch have traditional role and have poor access to allessential services;

Women participation in socio-cultural activities is very low, therefore they leg

behind men on almost all the socioeconomic indices but the women’s are able totake decision related to education and health;

Considering daily wages, women are paid less than men, this make their rolesecondary.

7.9 Mode of Transport for women: During the survey it has been observed that womenmobility in this particular road is very low. For local level activities, women prefer towalk. School going girl are using cycles or go by walk

7.10 Motorized Vehicles Ownership: Below table provides information of motorizedvehicles ownership of surveyed families. Accordingly about 37.6% households ownvehicles. Out of these families majority have two wheelers (85.8%), followed by

(5.47%) own heavy vehicle, 6.56% families have four wheelers and none of thesurveyed family have three wheelers.

Table 20: Motorized Vehicles Ownership

VehicleOwnership

Vehicles inyour home

Type of Vehicle owned

Yes NoTwo

WheelerThree

WheelerFour

WheelerHeavy Vehicle/

TractorTotal

Numbers 84 139 79 2 6 5 92

Percentage 37.6% 62.4% 85.8% 2.17% 6.56% 5.47% 100%

Source: Socioeconomic survey, January 2016 by CETEST

7.11 Anaemia is a major health problem in Madhya Pradesh, especially for women andchildren which can result in maternal mortality, weakness, diminished physical andmental capacity, increased morbidity from infectious diseases, prenatal mortality,premature delivery, low birth weight, and (in children) impaired cognitiveperformance, motor development, and scholastic achievement (Ref. Women Status inMP and Planned Interventions – A Gender Review, State Planning Commission, MP,2010).

7.12 The Child Marriage Restraint Act of 1978 has set the minimum age for marriage forgirls at 18 years. According to the 1998-99 NFHS data, age at marriage is steadilyincreasing in the State, but all the same the percent of women marrying below 18years of age is high. NFHS-2 records that 75 percent of all women, 84 percent of ruralwomen and 52 percent of urban women married before 18 years (Ref. Women Statusin MP and Planned Interventions – A Gender Review, State Planning Commission,MP, 2010).

7.13 To improve the health status of women in the state, State Government of MP ispromoting following schemes (Ref. Women Status in MP and Planned Interventions– A Gender Review, State Planning Commission, MP, 2010).

• Janani-Suraksha-Yojana

• Prasuti-Sahayata-Yojana

• Mangal Divas


21/38



• Project Shaktiman

7.14 Similar to health, Government of Madhya Pradesh is promoting girls educationthrough various schemes. Following are the key programs:

• Ladli-Laximi Scheme

• Gaon Ki Beti Yojana

• Development of Special Education Zone for Women

• Kanya Utakarsh Shiksha Yojana

• Free Bicycle Yojana

• Kanya Sahakarta Protsahan Yojana

• Ashram Shala

• Kanya Shiksha Parisar

8 HIV/AIDS ISSUES

8.1 The first case of HIV/AIDS was detected in MP in 1988, and since then the number ofAids cases is rising. In view of the seriousness of the problem, MP Governmentconstituted AIDS Control Cell in 1992 under Medical Education Department.Subsequently MP state AIDS Control Society was constituted on 14/7/1998.MPSACS takes policy decisions for effective implementation of AIDS controlprogramme in MP. It is an autonomous institution, funded by National AIDS controlorganization (NACO).

8.2 Although Madhya Pradesh is still a low prevalence State, the land locked status ofthe state surrounded by five states with lot of migration and varied socio-culturalconstitutions and practices – necessitates close monitoring and implementation ofAIDS Control Programme.

8.3 At Present M.P. State AIDS Control Society is functioning under Department ofPublic Health & Family Welfare Govt. of Madhya Pradesh and is implementing allcomponent activities of AIDS Controls Program in all 51 Districts of Madhya Pradeshthrough Health Managers at Districts / Medical Colleges and NGOs. Following tableshows district wise number of HIV test, HIV positive cases and percentage during2005 – 2013 (October).

Table 21: HIV / AIDS Status of the District

Name ofthe District

Number ofHIV Test

HIV Positivecases

Percentage Remarks

Singrauli 34162 99 0.29 Increase in positive casesSource: Facts and figures, Madhya Pradesh State AIDS Control Society

8.4 Objectives of Madhya Pradesh State AIDS Control Society.

• To reduce the spread of HIV infection in Madhya Pradesh, and

• Strengthen state capacity to respond to HIV/AIDS on a long term basis

8.5 Project Components

a) Reducing HIV transmission among poor and marginalized section of thecommunity at high risk by targeted intervention, STD Control and Condom

promotion;


22/38



b) Reducing spread of HIV among the general population by reducing blood bornetransmission / Information, Education and Communication (IEC) and voluntaryCounselling and testing;

c) Strengthening implementation capacity at the Nation, state and municipalcorporation levels through the establishment of appropriate organisationalarrangements, Training and increasing timely access to reliable information.

d) Developing capacity for community based low cost care for people living withAIDS.

e) Establishing Inter sector linkage between Public, Private and Voluntary sectors.

9 PROJECT BENEFICIARIES AND BENEFIT

9.1 Focus Group Discussion of mixed group was arranged in following villages, tounderstand positive as well as negative impacts of the improvement of the road.

Table 22: Focus Group Discussion (Mixed) profile

Village Name Date Block DistrictNo. of

Participants

Kolhua 07-01-16 Deosar 22

Purail 07-01-16 Deosar Singrauli 28

Godbahara 07-01-16 Deosar 21

Total 71Source: Socio-economic Survey, January 2016 by CETEST

Table 23: Positive Impacts

Beneficiary Benefits

Road Service providers More Business opportunities, low wear & tierof vehicles, Saves time

Road Passengers Comfort travelling, less accidental risk

Drivers Smooth Driving, less maintenance cost

Residents along the road Business development, Easy transportation

Transport operators,owners, and managers

Low weir and tier of vehicle i.e. lowmaintenance cost.

Agro-industrialproducers

Easy access to markets, demand of productincreases,

Farmers Low transportation Cost, easy access tomarkets

Women Availability of ambulance, easytransportation

Vulnerable groups likepensioners, unemployed, disabled

Smooth & comfort travelling, Easy access tohealth Centers.

Health providers Easy Approach for ambulance, less time toreach in health center,

School children / teachers Safety, Teachers can reach on time,


23/38



Negative Impacts:

Issue Nature of problem

Pollution (especially during construction)

Noise & Air pollution increases

Diseases Breathing problems

Road safetyBy Speedy vehicle and ruff Driving may leadto increase in accidental risks.

Tree cutting Deforestation

Agriculture By pollution crops may damage.Source: Socio-economic Survey January 2016 by CETEST


24/38



Appendix 1: Scan Copy of Attendance Sheet of FGD (Mixed Group)


25/38




26/38




27/38



Appendix 2: Scan Copy of Attendance Sheet of FGD (Women Specific)


28/38




29/38




30/38



Appendix 3: Public Consultation Photographs

Public consultation at kolhua

Public consultation at Purail

Public consultation at Godbahara


31/38



Appendix 4: Details of Vulnerable Groups of Surveyed Families

VillageName of

HeadAge Caste

VulnerableCategory

FamilyMembers

Monthlyincome

(Rs)

Source of income

Kolhua raghuvarprasar

45 SC Caste 6 5000 Labour

Kolhua rajkumarkushwah

55 SC Caste 4 5500 Agriculture

Labour

Kolhua bahuramsingh


Labour

Kolhua rajmohan kol 40 ST Caste 5 7000 Agriculture

Labour

Kolhua keshlal gaur 47 ST Caste 6 5000 Labour

Kolhua dalesua kol 38 ST Caste 4 5000 Agriculture

Labour

Kolhua ram subashgaudh

65 ST Caste 6 5000 Labour

Kolhua jay karansingh gaur


Kolhua pradeep

kotwar

45 ST Caste 4 5500 Agriculture

Labour

Kolhua santkumarkaul


Labour

Kolhua patiraj singh 44 ST Caste 6 7000 Agriculture

Labour

Kolhua ram milangaudh


Kolhua bhaialalgaudh 50 ST Caste 4 7000 AgricultureLabour

Kolhua janak lal 51 ST Caste 6 3000 Labour

Kolhua sarman gaudh 40 ST Caste 6 6000 Agriculture

Labour

Kolhua brajhlal kaul 35 ST Caste 4 5500 Labour

Kolhua rajman kol 50 ST Caste 5 7000 Agriculture

Labour


32/38



VillageName of

HeadAge Caste

VulnerableCategory

FamilyMembers

Monthlyincome

(Rs)Source of income

Kolhua Tinku Saket 51 ST Caste 5 6000 Labour

Kolhua KanahiyaSaket

48 ST Caste 6 6000 Salesman

Kolhua Rajmati Saket 45 ST Caste 4 6500 Shop

Kolhua MaankuarSaket


Labour

Kolhua Raja kol 42 ST Caste 2 5000 Labour

Kolhua Chetan Kol 33 ST Caste 4 4500 Labour

Kolhua HeerendraSaket

41 ST Caste 6 6000 AgricultureLabour

Kolhua Sheetal Kol 30 ST Caste 4 5800 Labour

Kolhua Pramod Kol 39 ST Caste 6 6000 Agriculture

Labour

Kolhua Vivek Kol 36 ST Caste 2 5500 Labour

Kolhua Anil Saket 34 ST Caste 4 5000 Labour

Kolhua Teerath Saket 35 ST Caste 6 5500 Agriculture

Labour

Kolhua Jagan Bhai Kol 41 ST Caste 5 5000 Agriculture

Labour

Purail Lallu Bhai Kol 33 SC Caste 5 5000 Labour

Purail RamnivasSaket


Labour

Purail Raj ahirwar 28 SC Caste 4 5500 Agriculture

Labour

Purail rameshchamar


Labour

Purail virenderkumar

ahirwar


Purail bhagvan das 43 SC Caste 4 5000 Labour


33/38



VillageName of

HeadAge Caste

VulnerableCategory

FamilyMembers

Monthlyincome


Purail Chandra bhan 49 SC Caste 6 4500 Shop

Purail Rajbhan Bagri 58 SC Caste 4 5500 Salesman

Purail YogendraBagri


Labour

Purail Muratlal Bagri 50 SC Caste 2 4500 Labour

Purail BrijbhushanBagri


Labour

Purail Shivlal 45 SC Caste 6 6000 Agriculture

Labour

Purail Dadulal Bagri 55 SC Caste 5 4000 Agriculture

Labour

Purail ChandrabhanBagri


Labour

Purail Sushil ahirwar SC Caste 6 4500 Agriculture

Labour

Purail Ramlal 56 SC Caste 4 5000 Agriculture

Labour

Purail Rajjan 45 SC Caste 6 5500 Agriculture

Labour

Purail Muraani 45 SC Caste 2 7000 Pention/ Petty

Labour

Purail Ramyash 50 SC Caste 4 5000 Agriculture

Labour

Purail SantoshAhirwar


Labour

Purail Murarilal 43 SC Caste 3 5000 Agriculture

Labour

Purail AshokAhirwar


Labour

Purail Suresh 48 SC Caste 4 4600 Labour


34/38



VillageName of

HeadAge Caste

VulnerableCategory

FamilyMembers

Monthlyincome


Purail Chandra bhan 48 SC Caste 6 5000 Agriculture

Labour

Purail Babulal 45 SC Caste 2 6000 Agriculture

Labour

Purail ManojAhirwar


Purail SanjayAhirwar


Labour

Purail Pankaj 22 SC Caste 2 5500 Agriculture

Labour

Purail UmeshAhirwar


Purail Manglesh 46 SC Caste 8 5000 Salesman

Purail RameshDahiya


Labour

Purail jagdish Kewat 38 SC Caste 6 5500 Labour

Purail PrakashAhirwar


Labour

Purail Rahul 43 SC Caste 3 5000 Labour

Purail DayaShankar 51 SC Caste 5 6000 Agriculture

Labour

Purail JeetendraYadav


Purail Mansukhlal

Kewat


Purail OmPrakashAhirwar

42 SC Caste 2 4500 Shop

Purail Devi lalAhirwar

46 ST Caste 4 5500 Salesman

Purail Satish Dahiya 29 ST Caste 6 7000 Agriculture

Labour

PurailRoha saket 33

ST Caste2

4500 Labour

Purail

Shanker Saket45

ST Caste

45000

Agriculture

Labour


35/38



VillageName of

HeadAge Caste

VulnerableCategory

FamilyMembers

Monthlyincome


PurailDivan Saket

55ST Caste

86000

Agriculture

Labour

PurailDeepnarayan

Saket50

ST Caste6

4000Agriculture

Labour

PurailShrimati Saket

40ST Caste

65000

Agriculture

Labour

PurailLakshaman

Saket47

ST Caste8

4500Agriculture

Labour

Purail

Budhun Saket 38

ST Caste

6 5000

Agriculture

Labour

PurailDeepu Saket

65ST Caste

45500

Agriculture

Labour

PurailBandhu Saket

40ST Caste

57000

Pention/ Petty

Labour

PurailRamtahare

Saket45

ST Caste5

5000Agriculture

Labour

Purail Jhoru Baiga

40ST Caste

65000

Agriculture

Labour

PurailRaman saket 49

ST Caste9

5000Agriculture

Labour

PurailRajesh Kol 45

ST Caste5

5500Agriculture

Labour

Purail Mukhesh

saket51

ST Caste6

4600 Labour

PurailRaja kol 36

ST Caste7

5000Agriculture

Labour

PurailRamyash Kol 34

ST Caste4

6000Agriculture

Labour

Purail Saraju Saket 44 ST Caste 5 5500 Labour

Purail kaluram Saket 39 ST Caste 5 6000 Agriculture

Labour


36/38



VillageName of

HeadAge Caste

VulnerableCategory

FamilyMembers

Monthlyincome


Purail Kanti lalKewat


Labour

Purail Buru bagia 51 ST Caste 4 5000 Agriculture

Labour

Purail kamal Kol 49 ST Caste 5 5500 Agriculture

Labour

Purail manohar Kol 56 ST Caste 5 4500 Agriculture

Labour

Purail Ramgarib Kol 50 ST Caste 6 4500 Agriculture

Labour

Purail bhaiya lalsaket


Labour

Purail kailash saket 37 ST Caste 6 5000 Agriculture

Labour

Godbahara PrakashAhirwar


Godbahara Raj Bhushan 48 SC Caste 4 5500 AgricultureLabour

Godbahara AmbikaPrasad Bagri


Labour

Godbahara BhaiyalalBagri


Labour

Godbahara Gopi ChandKol


Labour

Godbahara Babulal Bagri 65 SC Caste 6 5000 Agriculture

Labour

Godbahara RamayanPrasad Bagri


Labour

Godbahara Santosh Bagri 56 SC Caste 5 5000 Agriculture

Labour


37/38



VillageName of

HeadAge Caste

VulnerableCategory

FamilyMembers

Monthlyincome


Godbahara Kamlesh Kol 30 SC Caste 5 5500 Agriculture

Labour

Godbahara BagvandasVishwakarma


Labour

Godbahara Guddu Baiga 33 SC Caste 9 5500 Agriculture

Labour

Godbahara Dashrasthkewat


Labour

Godbahara Sukhendra

kewat


Labour

Godbahara GangasagarVishwakarma


Godbahara Ramesh Baiga 35 SC Caste 4 5500 Agriculture

Labour

Godbahara Ashok Baiga 27 SC Caste 5 6000 Agriculture

Labour

Godbahara Ramsushil kol 56 ST Caste 5 5000 Shop

Godbahara Devendra Kol 54 ST Caste 6 7000 Agriculture

Labour

Godbahara Suresh kol 54 ST Caste 4 6500 Salesman

Godbahara Raja BhaiyaKol


Labour

Godbahara Hans lal Kol 58 ST Caste 5 5500 Labour

Godbahara Devi lal Kol 59 ST Caste 6 6500 Agriculture

Labour

Godbahara Ganga Saket 33 ST Caste 4 4500 Shop

Godbahara Ramlakhansaket


Labour

Godbahara Mansukh lalParaste



38/38


VillageName of

HeadAge Caste

VulnerableCategory

FamilyMembers

Monthlyincome


Godbahara Surya Saket 31 ST Caste 4 5000 Agriculture

Labour

Godbahara Rajmati Saket ST Caste 6 5500 Labour

Godbahara Chote LalSaket

ST Caste 4 5000 Agriculture

Labour

Godbahara Baban Saket 55 ST Caste 5 5500 Labour

Godbahara RamtahareSaket


Labour

Godbahara DeepnarayanSaket

45 ST Caste 4 7000 Shop

Godbahara Sushil Saket 52 ST Caste 8 5000 Shop

Godbahara Shankar Saket 38 ST Caste 6 6000 Agriculture

Labour

Godbahara Ramayan Kol 42 ST Caste 4 5500 Agriculture

Labour

Godbahara Karan Saket 56 ST Caste 6 4500 Labour

Godbahara RamakantSaket


Labour

Godbahara ArjunSaket 43 ST Caste 4 5000 Shop

Godbahara Bhaiya lal Kol 45 ST Caste 4 7000 Agriculture

Labour

Documents

Poverty and Social Analysis_Road JHURAI - SARAI