24
…speeding medicines to people… Potential Benefits of PAT for Biomanufacturing IFPAC 2005

Potential Benefits of PAT for Biomanufacturing IFPAC 2005...IFPAC- PAT for Biologics Manufacturing Session Speakers Wyeth BioPharma - Jerry Justin - SPC Baxter HealthCare - Paul Marshall

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • …speeding medicines to people…

    Potential Benefits of PAT for BiomanufacturingIFPAC 2005

  • Outline PAT for Biologics (Biotherapeutics) Mfg.

    • What is a biotherapeutic? • Converging trends in Biotech• PAT – player in overall biomfg. efficiency life cycle• PAT for biomfg. – current roadmap• Rationale and potential benefits of PAT• Challenges and risks applying PAT• Conclusions

  • S

    H

    HOO

    OCH3

    NH O

    O

    OCH3N

    EtO

    OHOCH3HOCH3

    OCH3

    HNHO

    OO

    OH

    CH3S

    CH3

    OCH3

    OCH3

    I

    O

    O

    OO

    S

    O

    NHN

    Me Me

    O

    CH3

    HN

    100 – 10,000 MWPrimary, secondary structure

    10,000 – 1,000,000 MW Primary, secondary, tertiary,

    quaternary structure

    What is a Biotherapeutic?Small Molecule Biotherapeutic

  • Challenges of a Biomfg. Process

    Cell Culture PrimaryRecovery

    Purification FormulationFilling

    99% pure$1,000,000/kg

    20 quality assays

    0.01% pure$1,000/kg

    3 quality assays

    500 raw material components

    (99.99% impurities)

    2 raw material excipients

    (1% impurities)

  • What is a Biotherapeutic?• Biopolymer - protein, nucleic acid, carbohydrate, etc.• Produced by cells – fungi, bacteria, mammalian, plant, insect cells• MW range: 10,000 – 1,000,000 daltons• Potency may depend upon:

    • Primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary structure

    • Glycosylation or Disulfide bridges between chains

    • Conjugation to small molecule

    • Degradation Susceptibility:• Oxidation, deamidation, protease digestion, gas/liquid interface denaturation

  • Biotherapeutics Mfg.Huge Waste of Manufacturing Failed Drugs

    • $40B sales worldwide, approx. 200 approvals• 10 yrs to bring a drug to market, 7 yrs in clinic• $1B total cost/drug, $900M is cost of failures• $4B spent on manufacturing (COGS @10% of sales)• $2B spent on outsourcing manufacturing• $3.6B spent on manufacturing failed drugs!

    Huge productivity gap for industry

  • Problem: Need for Faster, Better, Cheaper Mfg.Drug Pricing Pressure

    US Pricing controls imminentBiogenerics

    Reimbursement restrictionsDownward COGS pressure

    Tighter FDA RegulationsTighter mfg. controls/quality

    FDA PAT quality expectationsMore analytical powerMore on-line quality

    Smaller Drug MarketsFewer blockbusters

    Genetic diagnosis based treatment Personalized medicine

    Smaller patient populationsMore potent, combination drugs

    -Smaller niche drug markets

    -Higher Efficiency Development - Faster drug development - Lower failure rate in clinic

    -Manufacturing- smaller mfg. batches- higher yield, lower cost- faster response, more flexible- more efficient operations- improve quality

    New Paradigm

  • Biomfg. Scale is Shrinking

    Niche markets

    Improved potency

    Improving yields

    Traditional Platform Scale – 2,000L to 20,000L

    Xcellerex XDR Platform Scale – 200L to 2,000L

    time

    Amt p

    er d

    rug

  • PAT – Part of Mfg. Efficiency Improvement

    Facilities Analytics

    Product

    Process

    - Quality, PAT- Chemometrics

    -Process Knowledge- Operational Excellence

  • Xcellerex’s Mfg. Improvement Strategy• Process/Product - use HTS in PD to optimize process variables

    Knowledge - use process knowledge for efficiency planning

    • Process - automate control to reduce human errorControl - real time analysis to reduce excursions

    - eFactory monitors cGMP compliance

    • Contamination - use disposable systems everywhere (simpler)Reduction - enclose mfg. systems in clean modules

    • PAT Analytics - miniaturize and apply to process if rational- adapt on-line analytics to disposable systems

  • Biomfg. PAT – Current Roadmap

    UPSTREAMPARAMETRIC

    QUALITY ASSAYSNIR, pH, DO2

    DOWNSTREAMDIRECT QUALITY

    ASSAYSHPLC

    CHEMICAL QUALITY ASSAYS

    NIR, pH, DO2, HPLC

    AT-LINE On-floor IN-LINE

    OFF-LINE QC lab

    CHEMICAL, BIOASSAY QUALITY

    NIR, pH, DO2, HPLC

  • Biomfg. PAT – Current PracticesApproach Upstream Mfg. Downstream Mfg.

    Product Quality assay At / Off line In-Line: HPLC

    Product Conc. Assay In-line: OD, NIR In-line: UV

    Parametric analysis yes yes

    Process Knowledge yes yes

    Operational Excellence yes yes

  • PAT Enabling Technologies for BioMfg.• More enabling sensors on the horizon from genomics, proteomics, clinical diagnostics:

    Upstream Cell Culture

    PrimaryRecovery

    Purification FormulationFilling

    Bruker Optics, Biacore, Affinity Sensors, GWC Technologies, Nova BioMedical, Xantec, Texas Instruments, Waters, Applied BioSystems

    HPLCNIROD

    Surface Plasmon Resonance

    IRFTIRNIRUV

    HPLCIR

    FTIRNIR

    HPLCHPLCIR

    FTIRNIRUV

  • Rationale - More Data Can Be Beneficial

    Data set spectrum

    Comprehensive Data SetNarrow Data Set

    Full Process Spectrum

  • Rationale - Or a Curse if Mismanaged…Spurious Spikes in Continuous Data Stream

    1000

    600

    400

    200

    0

    800

    26-A

    ug-0

    2 17

    :52

    26-A

    ug-0

    2 21

    :48

    27-A

    ug-0

    2 01

    :44

    27-A

    ug-0

    2 09

    :37

    27-A

    ug-0

    2 05

    :41

    28-A

    ug-0

    2 05

    :10

    28-A

    ug-0

    2 09

    :15

    28-A

    ug-0

    2 13

    :12

    28-A

    ug-0

    2 17

    :08

    28-A

    ug-0

    2 21

    :04

    27-A

    ug-0

    2 13

    :33

    27-A

    ug-0

    2 17

    :30

    27-A

    ug-0

    2 21

    :20

    28-A

    ug-0

    2 01

    :11

    Parti

    cula

    tes ≥0

    .5 µ

    per f

    t3 (x

    10-

    3 )

  • Regulatory Risk with Biomfg. PAT• Data

    • What is the rationale for more data - how much data is too much data?

    • What is the right collection interval?

    • Continuous data versus intermittent collection?

    • How to use the data – speeding post batch release or enabling real-time release?

    • Noise• How to handle spurious spikes in continuous on-line data

    • May need extra validation to ignore these

    • What if On-line and Off-line assays don’t agree?

  • Challenges in Applying PAT to BioMfg.• 20 different assays define product quality!•

    • Large investment in bringing analytics on-line• Innovation in on-line analytical tools – technology feasible?• Extensive data needed during development to identify critical

    attributes and appropriate limits• Regulatory uncertainty

    • More data may reveal more variation• Stringency of limits related to criticality of impact• Interpretation by Field Inspectors uncertain

  • Road Map to Develop On-Line Assays• Rationale and sanity check:

    • Speed? Technology? Risk?

    • Start with a standard lab QC assay• Miniaturize and/or automate, make it robust• Software development - Part 11/GAMP compliant• Validation – road testing

    • Calibration, precision, linearity, accuracy, etc.

    • non-fouling, stability, calibration, etc.

    • Correlation with other assays – avoid conflicts• Benefit – measure it!

    Management Support

  • Rationale – PAT Can Help Efficiency, COGS

    • Ensure product quality remains consistent, live• Assess mfg. deviation impact in real time

    • Kill bad batches fast, save downstream manufacturing cost

    • Could help rescue batches heading to failure

    • Can reduce process validation requirements• Reduce testing requirements at end of process• Speed batch release, more batches per year• Overall strong potential to reduce COGS

  • Potential $ Savings with PATExample of On-Line Bioburden Assay

    • Assumptions:• 20 batches attempted per year, $20M annual budget

    • $1,000,000 total cost per batch, 50% in purification ($500,000/batch)

    • 90% overall batch success rate – 18 batches/yr, 2 fail due to bioburden

    • Cycle time of off-line bioburden assay: 14 days; to bulk: 7 days

    • Cost of lost batches if processed all the way to bulk: $2,000,000/year

    • Cost of lost batches if stopped at harvest: $1,000,000/year

    Potential Savings with on-line bioburden assay: $1,000,000 / year

  • Potential Benefits - Summary• PAT can be part of overall manufacturing improvement strategy• PAT rationale should be sound, regulatory risk needs clarity• Technology still very challenging, enabling sensors on horizon• Science-based management of manufacturing excursions• Product quality monitoring can save questionable batches• Potential to reduce batch release time, increases plant capacity• Potential lower manufacturing risk and COGS• May be big business opportunity for sensor and analytics firms!

  • Potential Result:

    Faster, Better, Cheaper Mfg.Pr

    oces

    s K

    now

    ledg

    e

    Present

    Future

    Mfg. Efficiency

  • Path Forward for Biomfg. PAT• Biopharm Industry’s role

    • Leaders provide examples of successful PAT• Present to industry followers• Invest in new technologies where rational

    • Vendors of Sensor Technology – adapt to biotherapeutics

    • FDA’s role• Listen to Industry – develop Guidance that is balanced, • Recognize complexity of biotherapeutics, take long term view• Harmonize Field Inspectors and international regulatory bodies

  • IFPAC- PAT for Biologics ManufacturingSession Speakers

    Wyeth BioPharma - Jerry Justin - SPC

    Baxter HealthCare - Paul Marshall - Oper. Excel

    Siemens AG - Ingrid Maes - in-line NIR

    Amgen - Duane Bonam - on-line HPLC

    Eli Lilly - Rick Cooley - on-line HPLC

    Outline PAT for Biologics (Biotherapeutics) Mfg.What is a Biotherapeutic?Small Molecule BiotherapeuticChallenges of a Biomfg. ProcessWhat is a Biotherapeutic?Biotherapeutics Mfg.Huge Waste of Manufacturing Failed DrugsProblem: Need for Faster, Better, Cheaper Mfg.Biomfg. Scale is ShrinkingPAT – Part of Mfg. Efficiency ImprovementXcellerex’s Mfg. Improvement StrategyBiomfg. PAT – Current RoadmapBiomfg. PAT – Current PracticesPAT Enabling Technologies for BioMfg.Rationale - More Data Can Be BeneficialRationale - Or a Curse if Mismanaged…Spurious Spikes in Continuous Data StreamRegulatory Risk with Biomfg. PATChallenges in Applying PAT to BioMfg.Road Map to Develop On-Line AssaysRationale – PAT Can Help Efficiency, COGSPotential $ Savings with PATExample of On-Line Bioburden AssayPotential Benefits - SummaryPath Forward for Biomfg. PATIFPAC- PAT for Biologics ManufacturingSession Speakers