Upload
tiffany-rice
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 Pot and the Criminal Justice System
1/2
The most significant issue now challenging the criminal justice system is the need to reformantiquated state and federal drug laws. Specifically, those that criminalize possession and sale of
marijuana. This issue is more prominent than others as these laws (1) overburden law
enforcement and judicial resources, (2) overwhelm our penal system, and (3) fail to recognize
the enormous economic benefits that will result with decriminalization. This issue is much like
the conundrum Americans faced in the 1920s with the prohibition of alcohol use. Advocates of
prohibition argued that alcohol misuse results in ill health effects and a variety of societal "evils"
(DUIs, public drunkenness, underage use). However, the health effects on limited use were
never established (with some studies suggesting benefits with moderate consumption of red
wine or light beer), and the social evils of alcohol consumption could be better controlled with
appropriate state or federal laws. The legislature balanced these purported negatives with an
individual's right to consume alcohol and a state's right to control distribution. However, change
came about because the economic benefits were enormous. Laws regulating alcohol
consumption and sale provided a steady source of revenue for the states, and the regulated
industry that provided jobs and tax revenue. The social changes were also many as there was
less of a burden on the penal system that did not arrest, prosecute and jail moderate consumers
of alcohol (cite needed). II EVIDENCE SUPPORTING ASSERTIONS The US economy will
immediately benefit from a federal law decriminalizing marijuana laws. 500 economists applied
the usage statistics of alcohol and tobacco to Marijuana, and determined that if Marijuana was
taxed like alcohol and tobacco, the country would see an income of a minimum of $6.2b. Add to
that the amount saved in not prosecuting offenders, $7.7b, as estimated by Harvard Economics
professor, Jeffrey Miron, and we have a $13b, swing in our economy. In addition, those working
in the Marijuana industry will also pay income tax, which also goes to the government, and was
not included in the estimations. Likewise, the human resources (judicial, penal, law
enforcement) that society commits to enforcing these laws are enormous (MPP). According to
the Marijuana Policy Project, a non-profit organization dedicated to reform of Marijuana laws
estimates that approximately 700,000 people each year are arrested from violations Marijuana
alone (NORML). With the number of prisoners in 2005 being approximately 1.5m (PDF), 700,000
people arrested seems substantial. While not all of those offenders go to jail, in 2005, there
were slightly over 20,000 offenders incarcerated for Marijuana (Whitehouse Drug Policy).
However, each of those 700,000 persons arrested now have a criminal record that will shadow
them. Each of those 700,000 persons has to go through the justice system, clogging it up with
unnecessary and frivolous lawsuits. Under contemporarily prudent legislature, Marijuana could
be successfully added to the list of controlled, but publicly available intoxicants. III. RESOLUTION
This issue can be successfully resolved through comprehensive regulation, although political
opposition will be keen. Perhaps the best approach is staging. First, congress should approve the
medicinal use of medical marijuana. This action can be followed by prohibition-like reforms
tailored after the laws in place in Amsterdam. Legalization will also reduce crime substantially in
the USA because it removes a whole black market worth of crime. Unfortunately many activists
claim they want decriminalization rather than legalization, under the auspices that it is a good
compromise. However, this just skirts around the problem, and makes it potentially worse; with
decriminalization, Marijuana would still be illegal, but permissible in small quantities. Ergo, a
8/3/2019 Pot and the Criminal Justice System
2/2
black market still exists, and negates the whole purpose of legalization. However, after
legalization the DEA can focus on those criminals who are ruining society by having Meth-lab's in
rural areas that blow up and kill innocent children. The DEA can focus on criminals like Britt and
Garrett Reid, who drive while intoxicated on Heroin, carry guns, and engage in risky, violent, and
illegal behavior. In conclusion, Barry Cooper, ex Narcotics Interdiction officer, and DEA certified
agent trainer, admits that 100% of the time, he would rather pull someone over who had been
smoking Marijuana, than someone who had been drinking, in his video Never Get Busted
Again(NGB). He continues, debunking the deceitful preaching's of current police officers. Think
about it, if an organization called Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (specifically Marijuana)
exists, might it be time to re-think our current laws if a substantial portion of those enforcing
the laws think they should be changed?
http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/drugfact/marijuana/index.html