8
Keelan Enseki, PT, MS, OCS, SCS, ATC, CSCS University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Centers for Rehab Services Center for Sports Medicine Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Dave Kohlrieser, PT, DPT, OCS, SCS, CSCS Orthopedic One Upper Arlington, Ohio Craig Mauro, MD Burke and Bradley Orthopedics University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Michaela Kopka, MD, FRCSC Banff Sports Medicine Center Alberta, Canada Tom Ellis, MD Orthopedic One Upper Arlington, Ohio POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES Hip Independent Study Course 27.1.1 CONTINUING PHYSICAL THERAPY EDUCATION Orthopaedic Section, APTA, Inc. Downloaded from www.orthoptlearn.org at the Orthopaedic Section on September 26, 2018. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright © 2017 Orthopaedic Section, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES · 2018. 12. 3. · Reduced muscle radiological density, cross-sectional area, and strength of major hip and knee muscles in 22 patients

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES · 2018. 12. 3. · Reduced muscle radiological density, cross-sectional area, and strength of major hip and knee muscles in 22 patients

Keelan Enseki, PT, MS, OCS, SCS, ATC, CSCSUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Centers for Rehab ServicesCenter for Sports Medicine

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Dave Kohlrieser, PT, DPT, OCS, SCS, CSCSOrthopedic One

Upper Arlington, Ohio

Craig Mauro, MDBurke and Bradley Orthopedics

University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Michaela Kopka, MD, FRCSCBanff Sports Medicine Center

Alberta, Canada

Tom Ellis, MDOrthopedic One

Upper Arlington, Ohio

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES

Hip

Independent Study Course 27.1.1

CONTINUING PHYSICAL THERAPY EDUCATION

Ort

hopa

edic

Sec

tion,

APT

A, I

nc.

Dow

nloa

ded

from

ww

w.o

rtho

ptle

arn.

org

at th

e O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n on

Sep

tem

ber

26, 2

018.

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y. N

o ot

her

uses

with

out p

erm

issi

on.

Cop

yrig

ht ©

201

7 O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n, A

PTA

, Inc

. All

righ

ts r

eser

ved.

Page 2: POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES · 2018. 12. 3. · Reduced muscle radiological density, cross-sectional area, and strength of major hip and knee muscles in 22 patients

38

1. Bozic KJ, Chan V, Valone FH 3rd, Feeley BT, Vail TP. Trends in hip arthroscopy utilization in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(8 Suppl):140-143. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.039. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

2. Montgomery SR, Ngo SS, et al. Trends and demo-graphics in hip arthroscopy in the United States. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(4):661-665. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.11.005. Epub 2013 Feb 1.

3. Tibor LM, Sink EL. Periacetabular osteoto-my for hip preservation. Orthop Clin North Am. 2012;43(3):343-357. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2012.05.011.

4. Khan M, Habib A, de Sa D, et al. Arthroscopy up to date: Hip femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(1):177-189. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.10.010.

5. Umehara N, Mitani S, Namba Y. Factors influenc-ing health-related quality of life after total hip ar-throplasty. Acta Med Okayama. 2016;70(2):89-95.

6. Reiman MP, Weisbach PC, Glynn PE. The hips in-fluence on low back pain: a distal link to a proximal problem. J Sport Rehabil. 2009;18(1):24-32.

7. Kelly BT, Shapiro GS, Digiovanni CW, Buly RL, Potter HG, Hannafin JA. Vascularity of the hip labrum: a cadaveric investigation. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(1):3-11.

8. Moore KL, Dalley, AF, Agur, AMR. Clinically Ori-ented Anatomy. 7th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Willliams & Wilkins; 2014.

9. Harding L, Barbe M, Shepard K, et al. Posterior- anterior glide of the femoral head in the acetab-ulum: a cadaver study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(3):118-125.

10. Palastanga N, Field D, Soames R. Anatomy and Human Movement: Structure and Function. 5th ed. Portsmouth, NH: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2006.

11. Clohisy JC, Nunley RM, Carlisle JC, Schoenecker PL. Incidence and characteristics of femoral defor-mities in the dysplastic hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(1):128-134. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0481-3. Epub 2008 Nov 26.

12. Staheli LT. Medial femoral torsion. Orthop Clin North Am. 1980;11(1):39-50.

13 Cibulka MT. Determination and signifi-cance of femoral neck anteversion. Phys Ther. 2004;84(6):550-558. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130222-17.

14. Ejnisman L, Philippon MJ, Lertwanich P, et al. Rela-tionship between femoral anteversion and find-

ings in hips with femoroacetabular impingement. Orthopedics. 2013;36(3):e293-300.

15. Zeng WN, Wang FY, Chen C, et al. Investigation of association between hip morphology and preva-lence of osteoarthritis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23477. doi: 10.1038/srep23477

16. Ponseti IV. Growth and development of the ace-tabulum in the normal child. Anatomical, histologi-cal, and roentgenographic studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(5):575-585.

17. Neuman DA. Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal System: Foundations for Rehabilitation. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2010.

18. Cerezal L, Arnaiz J, Canga A, et al. Emerging topics on the hip: ligamentum teres and hip microinsta-bility. Eur J Radio. 2012;81(12):3745-3754. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.001. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

19. Alzaharani A, Bali K, Gudena R, et al. The inner-vation of the human acetabular labrum and hip joint: an anatomic study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-41.

20. Haversath M, Hanke J, Landgraeber S, et al. The distribution of nociceptive innervation in the painful hip: a histological investiga-tion. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(6):770-776. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B6.30262

21. Kim YT, Azuma H. The nerve endings of the acetabular labrum. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;320:176-181.

22. Ferguson SJ, Bryant JT, Ganz R, Ito K. An in vitro investigation of the acetabular labral seal in hip joint mechanics. J Biomech. 2003;36(2):171-178.

23. Ferguson SJ, Bryant JT, Ganz R, Ito K. The influ-ence of the acetabular labrum on hip joint carti-lage consolidation: a poroelastic finite model. J Biomech. 2000;33(8):953-960.

24. Henak CR, Ellis BJ, Harris MD, Anderson AE, Peters CL, Weiss JA. Role of the acetabular labrum in load support across the hip joint. J Biomech. 2011;44(12):2201-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.jbio-mech.2011.06.011. Epub 2011 Jul 14.

25. Martin HD, Savage A, Braly BA, Palmer IJ, Beall DP, Kelly B. The function of the hip capsular ligaments: a quantitative report. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(2):188-195. doi: 10.1016/j. arthro.2007.08.024. Epub 2007 Nov 26.

26. Wertheimer LG, Lopes Sde L. Arterial supply of the femoral head. A combined angiographic and histolog-ical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971;53:545-556.

REFERENCES

Ort

hopa

edic

Sec

tion,

APT

A, I

nc.

Dow

nloa

ded

from

ww

w.o

rtho

ptle

arn.

org

at th

e O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n on

Sep

tem

ber

26, 2

018.

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y. N

o ot

her

uses

with

out p

erm

issi

on.

Cop

yrig

ht ©

201

7 O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n, A

PTA

, Inc

. All

righ

ts r

eser

ved.

Page 3: POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES · 2018. 12. 3. · Reduced muscle radiological density, cross-sectional area, and strength of major hip and knee muscles in 22 patients

39

27. Martin HD, Hatem MA, Kivlan BR, Martin RL. Function of the ligamentum teres in limiting hip rotation: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(9):1085-1091 doi: 10.1016/ j.arthro.2014.04.087. Epub 2014 Jun 6.

28. Kivlan BR, Richard Clemente F, Martin RL, Mar-tin HD. Function of the ligamentum teres during multi-planar movement of the hip joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(7):1664-1668. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2168-2. Epub 2012 Aug 11.

29. Philippon MJ. Arthroscopy of the hip in manage-ment of the athlete. In: McGinty JB, ed. Operative Arthroscopy. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003:879-883.

30. Bedi A, Lynch EB, Sibilsky Enselman ER, et al. Elevation in circulating biomarkers of car-tilage damage and inflammation in athletes with femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(11):2585-2590. doi: 10.1177/0363546513499308. Epub 2013 Aug 19.

31. McCarthy JC, Noble PC, Schuck MR, Wright J, Lee J. The Otto E. Aufranc Award: The role of labral lesions to development of early degenerative hip disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(393):25-37.

32. Seldes RM, Tan V, Hunt J, Katz M, Winiarsky R, Fitzgerald RH Jr. Anatomy, histologic features, and vascularity of the adult acetabular labrum. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(382):232-240.

33. Lewis CL, Sahrmann SA. Acetabular labral tears. Phys Ther. 2006;86(1):110-121.

34. Lage LA, Patel JV, Villar RN. The acetabular labral tear: an arthroscopic classification. Arthroscopy. 1996;12(3):269-272.

35. Groh MM, Herrera J. A comprehensive review of hip labral tears. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2009;2(2):105-117. doi: 10.1007/s12178-009-9052-9. Epub 2009 Apr 7.

36. Boykin RE, Anz AW, Bushnell BD, Kocher MS, Stubbs AJ, Philippon MJ. Hip instability. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19(6):340-349.

37. Philippon MJ. The role of arthroscopic ther-mal capsulorrhaphy in the hip. Clin Sports Med. 2001;20(4):817-829.

38. Peelle MW, Della Rocca GJ, Maloney WJ, Curry MC, Clohisy JC. Acetabular and femoral radio-graphic abnormalities associated with labral tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;(441):327-333.

39. Wenger DE, Kendell KR, Miner MR, Trousdale RT. Acetabular labral tears rarely occur in the ab-sence of bony abnormalities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(426):145-150.

40. Knesek MJ, Skendzel JG, Kelly BT, Bedi A. Ap-proach to the patient evaluation using static and dynamic hip pathomechanics. Oper Tech Sports Med. 2012;20(4):260-272. doi:10.1053/j.otsm.2012.09.004.

41. Clohisy JC, Dobson MA, Robison JF, et al. Radio-graphic structural abnormalities associated with premature, natural hip-joint failure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93 Suppl 2:3-9. doi: 10.2106/JB-JS.J.01734.

42. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Nötzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;(417):112-120.

43. Laborie LB, Lehmann TG, Engesaeter IØ, Eastwood DM, Engesaeter LB, Rosendahl K. Prevalence of radiographic findings thought to be associated with femoroacetabular impingement in a popula-tion-based cohort of 2081 healthy young adults. Radiology. 2011;260(2):494-502. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11102354. Epub 2011 May 25.

44. Lavigne M, Parvizi J, Beck M, Siebenrock KA, Ganz R, Leunig M. Anterior femoroacetabular im-pingement: part I. Techniques of joint preserving surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(418):61-66.

45. Hetsroni I, Larson CM, Dela Torre K, Zbeda RM, Magennis E, Kelly BT. Anterior inferior iliac spine deformity as an extra-articular source for hip impingement: a series of 10 patients treated with arthroscopic decompression. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(11):1644-1653. doi: 10.1016/ j.arthro.2012.05.882. Epub 2012 Sep 15.

46. Gala L, Clohisy J, Beaulé P. Hip dysplasia in the young adult. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(1):63-73. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00109.

47. Bracken J, Tran T, Ditchfield M. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: controversies and current concepts. J Paediatr Child Health. 2012;48(11):963-972, quiz 972-973. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02601.x.

48. Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S. Hip dysplasia: a signifi-cant risk factor for the development of hip osteo-arthritis. A cross-sectional survey. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005;44(2):211-218. Epub 2004 Oct 12.

49. Manaster BJ. From the RSNA Refresher Cours-es. Radiological Society of North America. Adult chronic hip pain: radiographic evaluation. Radio-graphics. 2000;20 Spec No:S3-S25.

50. Grill F, Bensahel H, Canadell J, Dungl P, Matasovic T, Vizkelety T. The Pavlik harness in the treatment of congenital dislocating hip: report on a multi-center study of the European Paediatric Ortho-paedic Society. J Pediatr Orthop. 1988;8(1):1-8.

Ort

hopa

edic

Sec

tion,

APT

A, I

nc.

Dow

nloa

ded

from

ww

w.o

rtho

ptle

arn.

org

at th

e O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n on

Sep

tem

ber

26, 2

018.

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y. N

o ot

her

uses

with

out p

erm

issi

on.

Cop

yrig

ht ©

201

7 O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n, A

PTA

, Inc

. All

righ

ts r

eser

ved.

Page 4: POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES · 2018. 12. 3. · Reduced muscle radiological density, cross-sectional area, and strength of major hip and knee muscles in 22 patients

40

51. Song FS, McCarthy JJ, MacEwen GD, Fuchs KE, Dulka SE. The incidence of occult dysplasia of the contralateral hip in children with unilateral hip dysplasia. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28(2):173-176. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318164ee2d.

52. Van Bosse H, Wedge JH, Babyn P. How are dys-plastic hips different? A three-dimensional CT study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(5):1712-1723. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4103-y. Epub 2014 Dec 19.

53. Armand M, Lepistö J, Tallroth K, Elias J, Chao E. Outcome of periacetabular osteotomy: joint contact pressure calculation using standing AP radiographs, 12 patients followed for average 2 years. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(3):303-313.

54. Hipp J, Sugano N, Millis M, Murphy SB. Planning acetabular redirection osteotomies based on joint contact pressures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;(364):134-143.

55. Klaue K, Durnin C, Ganz R. The acetabular rim syn-drome. A clinical presentation of dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73(3):423-429.

56. Michaeli DA, Murphy SB, Hipp JA. Comparison of predicted and measured contact pressures in normal and dysplastic hips. Med Eng Phys. 1997;19(2):180-186.

57. Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Hip morphol-ogy influences the pattern of damage to the ace-tabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(7):1012-1018.

58. Fujii M, Nakashima Y, Jingushi S, et al. Intraarticu-lar findings in symptomatic developmental dyspla-sia of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009;29(1):9-13. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318190a0be.

59. Noguchi Y, Miura H, Takasugi S, Iwamoto Y. Car-tilage and labrum degeneration in the dysplastic hip generally originates in the anterosuperior weight-bearing area: an arthroscopic observation. Arthroscopy.1999;15(5):496-506.

60. Chen AF, Pigott MT, Klatt BA. Surgical total hip arthroplasty options for geriatric patients. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2013;29(4):253-259. doi:10.1097/TGR.0b013e318292e6dc.

61. Cibulka MT, White DM, Woehrle J, et al. Hip pain and mobility deficits--hip osteoarthritis: clinical practice guidelines linked to the international clas-sification of functioning, disability, and health from the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(4):A1-25. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.0301.

62. Dagenais S, Garbedian S, Wai EK. Systematic review of the prevalence of radiographic pri-

mary hip osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(3):623-637. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0625-5. Epub 2008 Nov 27.

63. Goldring SR, Goldring MB. Clinical aspects, pathol-ogy and pathophysiology of osteoarthritis. J Mus-culoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2006;6(4):376-378.

64. Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Oster JD, Bernsen RM, Ver-haar JA, Ginai AZ, Bohnen AM. Joint space nar-rowing and relationship with symptoms and signs in adults consulting for hip pain in primary care. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(8):1713-1718.

65. Altman R, Alarcón G, Appelrouth D, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis Rheum. 1991;34(5):505-514.

66. Steultjens MP, Dekker J, van Baar ME, Oostendorp RA, Bijlsma JW. Muscle strength, pain and dis-ability in patients with osteoarthritis. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15(3):331-341.

67. Rasch A, Bystrom AH, Dalen N, Berg HE. Reduced muscle radiological density, cross-sectional area, and strength of major hip and knee muscles in 22 patients with hip osteoarthritis. Acta Orthop. 2007;78(4):505-510.

68. Arokoski MH, Arokoski JP, Haara M, et al. Hip muscle strength and muscle cross sectional area in men with and without hip osteoarthritis. J Rheuma-tol. 2002;29(10):2185-2195.

69. Sutlive TG, Lopez HP, Schnitker DE, et al. Devel-opment of a clinical prediction rule for diagnosing hip osteoarthritis in individuals with unilateral hip pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(9):542-550. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2753. Epub 2008 Sep 1.

70. Wright AA, Cook C, Abbott JH. Variables associat-ed with the progression of hip osteoarthritis: a sys-tematic review. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(7):925-936. doi: 10.1002/art.24641.

71. Tepper S, Hochberg MC. Factors associated with hip osteoarthritis: data from the First Na-tional Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES-I). Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137(10):1081-1088.

72. Cooper C, Inskip H, Croft P, et al. Individual risk factors for hip osteoarthritis: obesity, hip injury, and physical activity. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147(6):516-522.

73. Gelber AC, Hochberg MC, Mead LA, Wang NY, Wigley FM, Klag MJ. Joint injury in young adults and risk for subsequent knee and hip osteoarthri-tis. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133(5):321-328.

74. Enseki KR, Harris-Hayes M, White DM, et al. Nonarthritic hip joint pain. J Orthop Sports

Ort

hopa

edic

Sec

tion,

APT

A, I

nc.

Dow

nloa

ded

from

ww

w.o

rtho

ptle

arn.

org

at th

e O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n on

Sep

tem

ber

26, 2

018.

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y. N

o ot

her

uses

with

out p

erm

issi

on.

Cop

yrig

ht ©

201

7 O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n, A

PTA

, Inc

. All

righ

ts r

eser

ved.

Page 5: POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES · 2018. 12. 3. · Reduced muscle radiological density, cross-sectional area, and strength of major hip and knee muscles in 22 patients

41

Phys Ther. 2014;44(6):A1-32. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.0302.

75. Enseki KR, Kohlrieser DA. Rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy: an evolving process. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9(6):765-773.

76. Martin RL, Enseki KR, Draovitch P, Trapuzzano T, Philippon MJ. Acetabular labral tears of the hip: examination and diagnostic challenges. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(7):503-515.

77. Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Sekiya JK. The diagnostic accuracy of a clinical examination in determining intra-articular hip pain for potential hip arthros-copy candidates. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(9):1013-1018. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.04.075. Epub 2008 Jun 16.

78. Maslowski E, Sullivan W, Forster Harwood J, et al. The diagnostic validity of hip provocation maneuvers to detect intra-articular hip pathol-ogy. PM R. 2010;2(3):174-181. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.01.014.

79. Mitchell B, McCrory P, Brukner P, O’Donnell J, Colson E, Howells R. Hip joint pathology: clinical presentation and correlation between magnetic resonance arthrography, ultrasound, and ar-throscopic findings in 25 consecutive cases. Clin J Sport Med. 2003;13(3):152-156.

80. Reiman MP, Thorborg K. Clinical examination and physical assessment of hip joint related pain in ath-letes. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9(6):737-755.

81. Byrd JW, Jones KS. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical assessment, magnetic resonance imaging, mag-netic resonance arthrography, and intra-articular injection in hip arthroscopy patients. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(7):1668-1674.

82. Tranovich MJ, Salzler MJ, Enseki KR, Wright VJ. A review of femoroacetabular impinge-ment and hip arthroscopy in the athlete. Phys Sportsmed. 2014;42(1):75-87. doi: 10.3810/psm.2014.02.2050.

83. Kivlan BR, Martin RL, Sekiya JK. Response to diagnostic injection in patients with femoroac-etabular impingement, labral tears, chondral lesions, and extra-articular pathology. Arthros-copy. 2011;27(5):619-627. doi: 10.1016/j.ar-thro.2010.12.009.

84. Domb BG, Gui C, Lodhia P. How much arthritis is too much for hip arthroscopy: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(3):520-529. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.008. Epub 2014 Dec 25.

85. Mardones RM, Gonzalez C, Chen Q, Zobitz M, Kaufman KR, Trousdale RT. Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: evaluation of the effect of the size of the resection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(2):273-279.

86. MacDonald AE, Bedi A, Horner NS, et al. Indi-cations and outcomes for microfracture as an adjunct to hip arthroscopy for treatment of chondral defects in patients with femoroac-etabular impingement: A systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(1):190-200. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.041. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

87. Hariri S, Truntzer J, Smith RL, Safran MR. Biochem-ical and cellular assessment of acetabular chondral flaps identified during hip arthroscopy. Arthros-copy. 2015;31(6):1077-1083. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.01.010. Epub 2015 Mar 5.

88. Meulenkamp B, Gravel D, Beaulé PE. Viability assessment of the chondral flap in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement: a pre-liminary report. Can J Surg. 2014;57(1):44-48.

89. Stafford GH, Bunn JR, Villar RN. Arthroscopic repair of delaminated acetabular articular carti-lage using fibrin adhesive. Results at one to three years. Hip Int. 2011;21(6):744-750. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2011.8843.

90. Allen WC, Cope R. Coxa saltans: the snapping hip revisited. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1995;3(5):303-308.

91. Griffin KM, Henry CO, Byrd JWT. Rehabilitation af-ter hip arthroscopy. J Sport Rehabil. 2000;9:77-88.

92. Bizzini M, Notzli HP, Maffiuletti NA. Femoroace-tabular impingement in professional ice hockey players: a case series of 5 athletes after open surgical decompression of the hip. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(11):1955-1959. Epub 2007 Jul 3.

93. Cheatham SW, Enseki KR, Kolber MJ. Postopera-tive rehabilitation after hip arthroscopy: a search for the evidence. J Sport Rehabil. 2015;24(4):413-418. doi: 10.1123/JSR.2014-0208a.

94. Enseki KR, Draovitch P. Rehabilitation for hip ar-throscopy. Oper Tech Orthop. 2010;20(4):278-281.

95. Enseki KR, Martin RL, Draovitch P, Kelly BT, Philip-pon MJ, Schenker ML. The hip joint: arthroscopic procedures and postoperative rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(7):516-525.

96. Spencer-Gardner L, Eischen J, Levy B, Sierra RJ, Engasser WM, Krych AJ. A comprehensive five-phase rehabilitation programme after hip arthros-copy for femoroacetabular impingement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(4):848-859.

97. Stalzer S, Wahoff M, Scanlan M. Rehabilita-tion following hip arthroscopy. Clin Sports Med. 2006;25(2):337-357.

98. Voight ML, Robinson K, Gill L, Griffin K. Postopera-tive rehabilitation guidelines for hip arthroscopy in an active population. Sports Health. 2010;2(3):222-230.

Ort

hopa

edic

Sec

tion,

APT

A, I

nc.

Dow

nloa

ded

from

ww

w.o

rtho

ptle

arn.

org

at th

e O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n on

Sep

tem

ber

26, 2

018.

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y. N

o ot

her

uses

with

out p

erm

issi

on.

Cop

yrig

ht ©

201

7 O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n, A

PTA

, Inc

. All

righ

ts r

eser

ved.

Page 6: POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES · 2018. 12. 3. · Reduced muscle radiological density, cross-sectional area, and strength of major hip and knee muscles in 22 patients

42

99. Kivlan BR, Martin R. A critical review of perfor-mance tests for hip-related dysfunction. Orthop Phys Ther Practice. 2013;25(3):170-173.

100. Willimon S, Briggs K, Philippon MJ. Intra-artic-ular adhesions following hip arthroscopy: a risk factor analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(4):822-825. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2728-0. Epub 2013 Oct 26.

101. Malloy P, Malloy M, Draovitch P. Guidelines and pitfalls for the rehabilitation following hip arthros-copy. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013;6(3):235-241. doi: 10.1007/s12178-013-9176-9.

102. Austin AB, Souza RB, Meyer JL, Powers CM. Identification of abnormal hip motion associated with acetabular labral pathology. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(9):558-565. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2790. Epub 2008 Sep 1.

103. Edelstein J, Ranawat A, Enseki KR, Yun RJ, Draovitch P. Postoperative guidelines following hip arthroscopy. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2012;5(1):15-23. doi: 10.1007/s12178-011-9107-6.

104. Philippon MJ, Decker MJ, Giphart JE, Torry MR, Wahoff MS, LaPrade RF. Rehabilitation exercise progression for the gluteus medius muscle with consideration for iliopsoas ten-dinitis: an in vivo electromyography study. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(8):1777-1785. doi: 10.1177/0363546511406848. Epub 2011 May 12.

105. Selkowitz DM, Beneck GJ, Powers CM. Which ex-ercises target the gluteal muscles while minimizing activation of the tensor fascia lata? Electromyo-graphic assessment using fine-wire electrodes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(2):54-64. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4116. Epub 2012 Nov 16.

106. Harris-Hayes M, Mueller MJ, Sahrmann SA, et al. Persons with chronic hip joint pain exhibit reduced hip muscle strength. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44(11):890-898. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.5268. Epub 2014 Oct 9.

107. Ayeni OR, Bedi A, Lorich DG, Kelly BT. Femoral neck fracture after arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(9):e47. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00792.

108. Enseki KR, Martin R, Kelly BT. Rehabilitation after arthroscopic decompression for femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Sports Med. 2010;29(2):247-255, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2009.12.007..

109. Haughom BD, Erickson BJ, Rybalko D, Hellman M, Nho SJ. Arthroscopic acetabular microfracture with the use of flexible drills: a technique guide. Ar-

throsc Tech. 2014;3(4):e459-e463. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2014.05.002. eCollection 2014.

110. Wahoff M, Dischiavi S, Hodge J, Pharez JD. Reha-bilitation after labral repair and femoroacetab-ular decompression: criteria-based progression through the return to sport phase. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9(6):813-826.

111. Garrison JC, Shanley E, Thigpen C, Geary R, Osler M, Delgiorno J. The reliability of the vail sport testTM as a measure of physical performance fol-lowing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(1):20-30.

112. Weber AE, Harris JD, Nho SJ. Complications in hip arthroscopy: a systematic review and strategies for prevention. Sports Med Ar-throsc. 2015;23(4):187-193. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000084.

113. Aprato A, Jayasekera N, Villar RN. Revision hip ar-throscopic surgery: outcome at three years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(4):932-937. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2373-7. Epub 2013 Jan 18.

114. Ganz R, Klaue K, Vinh TS, Mast JW. A new peri-acetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias. Technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;(232):26-36.

115. Leunig M, Siebenrock KA, Ganz R. Rationale of periacetabular osteotomy and background work. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:229-238.

116. Millis M, Kain M, Sierra R, et al. Periacetabular os-teotomy for acetabular dysplasia in patients older than 40 years: a preliminary study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(9):2228-2234. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0824-8. Epub 2009 May 7.

117. Teratani T, Naito M, Kiyama, T, Maeyama A. Periac-etabular osteotomy in patients fifty years of age or older. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;(Suppl 1):30-39. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01126.

118. Coobs B, Xiong A, Clohisy J. Contemporary concepts in the young adult hip patient: periac-etabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia. J Arthro-plasty. 2015;30(7):1105-1108. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.02.045. Epub 2015 Mar 25.

119. Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Beaule PE, et al. A sys-tematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 4):47-66. doi: 10.2106/JB-JS.H.00756.

120. Cooperman D, Wallensten R, Stulberg S. Acetab-ular dysplasia in the adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;(175):79-85.

121. Cerezal L, Arnaiz J, Canga A, et al. Emerging topics on the hip: ligamentum teres and hip microinsta-

Ort

hopa

edic

Sec

tion,

APT

A, I

nc.

Dow

nloa

ded

from

ww

w.o

rtho

ptle

arn.

org

at th

e O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n on

Sep

tem

ber

26, 2

018.

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y. N

o ot

her

uses

with

out p

erm

issi

on.

Cop

yrig

ht ©

201

7 O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n, A

PTA

, Inc

. All

righ

ts r

eser

ved.

Page 7: POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES · 2018. 12. 3. · Reduced muscle radiological density, cross-sectional area, and strength of major hip and knee muscles in 22 patients

43

bility. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(12):3745-3754. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.001. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

122. Burnett RS, Della Rocca GJ, Prather H, Curry M, Maloney WJ, Clohisy JC. Clinical presentation of patients with tears of the acetabular labrum. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(7):1448-1457.

123. Tönnis D. Congenital Dysplasia and Dislocation of the Hip in Children and Adults. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1987.

124. Delaunay S, Dussault RG, Kaplan PA, Alford BA. Radiographic measurements of dysplastic adult hips. Skeletal Radiol. 1997;26(2):75-81.

125. Clohisy JC, Nunley RM, Curry MC, Shoenecker PL. Periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of ac-etabular dysplasia associated with major aspheri-cal femoral head deformities. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(7):1417-1423.

126. Peters C, Erickson J, Anderson M, Anderson LA. Preservation of the rectus femoris origin during periacetabular osteotomy does not compromise acetabular reorientation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(2):608-614. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3837-x.

127. Gautier E, Ganz K, Krügel N, Gill T, Ganz R. Anat-omy of the medial femoral circumflex artery and its surgical implications. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(5):679-683.

128. Luo D, Zhang H, Zhang W. Comparison of three approaches of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016;12:67-72. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S81914. eCollection 2016.

129. Kamath AF. Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia: Surgical technique and indications. World J Orthop. 2016;7(5):280-286. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i5.280. eCollection 2016.

130. Hussell J, Mast J, Mayo K, Howie DW, Ganz R. A comparison of different surgical approaches for the periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;(363):64-72.

131. Siebenrock KA, Schoeniger R, Ganz R. Anterior femoro-acetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion. Treatment with periacetabular os-teotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(2):278-286.

132. Bogunovic L, Hunt D, Prather H, Schoenecker PL, Clohisy JC. Activity tolerance after periacetabular osteotomy. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(8):1791-1795. doi: 10.1177/0363546514535906. Epub 2014 Jun 9.

133. Alcobía Díaz B, Luque Pérez R, García Bullón I, Moro Rodríquez LE, Lopez-Durán Stern L. Long-term clinical and radiological outcomes in a series of 26 cases of symptomatic adult developmen-

tal dysplasia of the hip managed with bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2015;59(6):421-428. doi: 10.1016/j.recot.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 Jun 10.

134. Tippett SR. Returning to sports after periacetabu-lar osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006;1(1):32-39.

135. Ezoe M, Naito M, Asayama I. Muscle strength improves after abductor-sparing periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;444:161-168.

136. Ito H, Tanino H, Sato T, Nishida Y, Matsuno T. Early weight-bearing after periacetabular osteotomy leads to a high incidence of postoperative pelvic fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:234. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-234.

137. Crowninsheild RD, Johnston RC, Andrews JG, Brand RA. A biomechanical investigation of the human hip. J Biomech. 1978;11(1-2):75-85.

138. Kendall KD, Patel C, Wiley JP, Pohl MB, Emery CA, Ferber R. Steps toward the validation of the Trendelenburg test: the effect of experimentally reduced hip abductor muscle function on frontal plane mechanics. Clin J Sport Med. 2013;23(1):45-51. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31825e66a1.

139. Pedersen E, Alkjaer T, Søballe, K, Simonsen EB. Walking pattern in 9 women with hip dysplasia 18 months after periacetabular osteotomy. Acta Orthop. 2006;77(2):203-208.

140. Canale ST, ed. Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics. 9th ed. New York, NY: Mosby; 1998:296-461.

141. Ranawat CS, Atkinson RE, Salvati EA, Wilson PD Jr. Conventional total hip arthroplasty for de-generative joint disease in patients between the ages of forty and sixty years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(5):745-752.

142. Baker RP, Pollard TC, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC. A medium-term comparison of hybrid hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(2):158-163. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.25625.

143. Enseki KR, Berliner M. Rehabilitation following total hip arthroplasty surgery. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2013;29(4):260-267.

144. Jolles BM, Bogoch ER. Posterior versus lateral sur-gical approach for total hip arthroplasty in adults with osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(3):CD003828.

145. Whatling GM, Dabke HV, Holt CA, et al. Objective functional assessment of total hip arthroplasty following two common surgical approaches: the posterior and direct lateral approaches. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2008;222(6):897-905.

Ort

hopa

edic

Sec

tion,

APT

A, I

nc.

Dow

nloa

ded

from

ww

w.o

rtho

ptle

arn.

org

at th

e O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n on

Sep

tem

ber

26, 2

018.

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y. N

o ot

her

uses

with

out p

erm

issi

on.

Cop

yrig

ht ©

201

7 O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n, A

PTA

, Inc

. All

righ

ts r

eser

ved.

Page 8: POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES · 2018. 12. 3. · Reduced muscle radiological density, cross-sectional area, and strength of major hip and knee muscles in 22 patients

44

146. Bertin KC, Röttinger H. Anterolateral mini-in-cision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(429):248-255.

147. Restrepo C, Parvizi J, Kurtz SM, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. The noisy ceramic hip: is component malpositioning the cause? J Ar-throplasty. 2008;23(5):643-649. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.001.

148. Dowson D, Hardaker C, Flett M, Isaac GH. A hip joint simulator study of the performance of met-al-on-metal joints: Part II: design. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(8 Suppl 3):124-130.

149. deSouza RM, Wallace D, Costa ML, Krikler SJ. Transplacental passage of metal ions in wom-en with hip resurfacing: no teratogenic effects observed. Hip Int. 2012;22(1):96-99. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2012.9100.

150. Smith TO, Blake V, Hing CB. Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthro-plasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. Int Orthop. 2011;35(2):173-184. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1075-8. Epub 2010 Jun 18.

151. Cheatham SW. Hip resurfacing: current concepts and clinical considerations. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2013;29(4):246-252.

152. Nunley RM, Della Valle CJ, Barrack RL. Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing? Clin Or-thop Relat Res. 2009;467(1):56-65. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0558-z. Epub 2008 Oct 22.

153. Kohan L, Field CJ, Kerr DR. Early complications of hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(6):997-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.01.030. Epub 2012 Apr 13.

154. Berge DJ, Dolin SJ, Williams AC, Harman R. Pre-operative and postoperative effect of a pain management programme prior to total hip re-placement: a randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2004;110(1-2):33-39.

155. McGregor AH, Rylands H, Owen A, Doré CJ, Hughes SP. Does preoperative hip rehabilitation advice improve recovery and patient satisfaction? J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(4):464-468.

156. Neumann DA, Cook TM. Effect of load and carry-ing position on the electromyographic activity of the gluteus medius muscle during walking. Phys Ther. 1985;65(3):305-311.

157. Stern SH, Fuchs MD, Ganz SB, Classi P, Sculco TP, Salvati FA. Sexual function following total hip ar-throplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;(269):228-235.

158. Martin RL, Philippon MJ. Evidence of reliability and responsiveness for the hip outcome score.

Arthroscopy. 2008;24(6):676-682. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.12.011. Epub 2008 Mar 12.

159. Mohtadi NG, Griffin DR, Pedersen ME, et al. The Development and validation of a self-administered quality-of-life outcome measure for young, active patients with symptomatic hip disease: the Inter-national Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33). Arthros-copy. 2012;28(5):595-605, quiz 606-610.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.03.013.

160. Thorborg K, Hölmich P, Christensen R, Peters-en J, Roos EM. The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS): development and validation according to the COSMIN checklist. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(6):478-491. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.080937.

161. Jauregui JJ, Lerner AL, Mistry JB, Chughtai M, Elmallah RK, Mont MA. A comprehensive assess-ment of various outcome scores to evaluate total hip arthroplasties. Surg Technol Int. 2015;27:251-256.

162. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Camp-bell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheu-matic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15(12):1833-1840.

163. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51(4):737-755.

164. Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klässbo M, Roos EM. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)--validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;4:10. Epub 2003 May 30.

165. Nilsdotter A, Bremander A. Measures of hip function and symptoms: Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Lequesne Index of Severity for Osteoarthritis of the Hip (LISOH), and American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) Hip and Knee Questionnaire. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63 Suppl 11:S200-207. doi: 10.1002/acr.20549.

Ort

hopa

edic

Sec

tion,

APT

A, I

nc.

Dow

nloa

ded

from

ww

w.o

rtho

ptle

arn.

org

at th

e O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n on

Sep

tem

ber

26, 2

018.

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y. N

o ot

her

uses

with

out p

erm

issi

on.

Cop

yrig

ht ©

201

7 O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n, A

PTA

, Inc

. All

righ

ts r

eser

ved.