15
Postmodern Los Angeles

Postmodern los angeles

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Postmodern los angeles

Postmodern Los Angeles

Page 2: Postmodern los angeles

Los Angeles as a postmodern city

● Instability● First of all, the city lies on a geological fault. The city is surrounded by the

desert.

● Horizontality● a combination of decentralization and recentralization, the

peripheralization of the center and the centralization of the periphery, the city simultaneously being turned inside out and outside in. (Soja, p. 131)

● Segregation

Page 3: Postmodern los angeles

Los Angeles as a postmodern city● Los Angeles has become an archetype of a

postmodern city;

● Cities no longer have a recognizable pattern;

● The postmodern global metropolis is physically and socially fragmented;

● Edge cities are immerging,

● as an attempt to recentralize the city.

● Characteristics of edge cities are

● varied from industial, commercil,

● relatively poor, and ethnic minorities

Page 4: Postmodern los angeles

Los Angeles as a postmodern city● LA does not display the industrial legacy of the

classic industrial city;

● The significance of the Central Business District(CBD) has been reduced, causing increased decentralization, and the formation of multiple nuclei model to arise;

● The spead of the city has led to the wide use of automobiles, as a main means of transportation

Page 5: Postmodern los angeles

● Living in a postmodern age, a need exists to dig at truths while grasping at the “contingencies of morality and social choice”. Postmodernism provides this service. Undoubtedly, diversity, technology, synergy, hybridization, and multiculturalism all combine to create an urban condition different from that that came before. The nation and the world has been “de-centered”, postmodernism has helped to chip away at the “shame” of scholarship pushing one hegemonic perspective, granting us the ability to hear voices and perspectives previously ignored but now vital to the way we live now.

Postmodern cities

Page 6: Postmodern los angeles

Problems of Los Angeles

● social problems;● environmental problems;● graffiti problems;● traffic problems;● gang problems;● smog problems;● water problems;● pollution problems

Page 7: Postmodern los angeles

Smog over Los Angeles

Page 8: Postmodern los angeles

Trash boom in L.A. river

Page 9: Postmodern los angeles
Page 10: Postmodern los angeles

Scientists about L.A.Problems and future

Page 11: Postmodern los angeles

William Fulton’s :TheReluctant Metropolis: The Politics of Urban Growth in Los Angeles(1997)

A kind of cocoon citizenship that precludes diverse communities and democratic ways of life:once inside their cocoon, the suburbanites see no butterfly- like value in emerging. They only seek to stay inside forever, petrified in their tracts, like ancient fossils. So removed are cocoon citizens from the totality of metropolitan life that they can no longer see the full range of activities a metropolis encompasses, or that they are part of it no matter what they do. All they can do is try to define the breadth of metropolitan life by what they’veobserved inside their cocoon. (1997:341).

Page 12: Postmodern los angeles

Norman Klein’s provocativebook The History of Forgetting: Los Angeles and the Erasure of Memory(1997).

The first myth of Los Angeles, from the 1880s to 1930s, was that of the climate: an untouched garden of sunshine ripe for development yet wonderfully devoid of the evils of other major U.S. cities—pollution, overpopulation, and slums. The freeway metropolis myth came next, from 1936 to 1949, stressing the need to control an unruly nature that had led to uneven developmentand urban decayDowntown renewal, justifying the eliminationof ethnic (non-white) enclaves that had “nothing worth saving” anyway.

Page 13: Postmodern los angeles

Mike Davis’ City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles(1990)

by hyping Los Angeles as the paradigm of the future (even in a dystopian vein), they tend to collapse history into teleology and glamorize the very reality they would deconstruct. Soja and Jameson, particularly, in the very eloquence of their different “postmodern mappings” of Los Angeles, become celebrants of the myth. The city is aplace where everything is possible, nothing is safe anddurable enough to believe in, where constant synchronicity prevails, and automatic ingenuity of capital ceaselessly throws up new forms and spectacles . (1990:86)

Page 14: Postmodern los angeles

Los Angeles was the kind of place where everybody was from somewhere else and nobody really dropped anchor. It was a transient place. People drawn by the dream, people running from the nightmare. Twelve million people and all of them ready to make a break for it if necessary. Figuratively, literally, metaphorically -- any way you want to look at it -- everybody in L.A. keeps a bag packed. Just in case.”

― Michael Connelly, The Brass Verdict

Page 15: Postmodern los angeles

Discussion questions

What do you think makes Los Angeles to a postmodern city?

L.A. School views the city as a representative of future urban forms.However there are many other Western cities, with many of the same elements as Los Angeles. Do you think that Los Angeles is a representative of future urban forms?