2
 Mental states & cognitive functions have been argued to extend beyond the skin of the organ ism with biological and environmentally located elements entering into a partnership that enables flexible thinking and acting. EMT and Complementarity We defend a complementarity version of the extended mind according to which externally located resources and internal biological elements make a different but complementary causal contribution to bringing about intelligent behaviour SSDs and Plasticity Plasticity and Culture: the Magic Duo It is the activities we participate in the world that determine which neural circuits get to survive in our brains. Circuits that are often used during development get reinforced, while those that lie dormant are simply abandoned and their connections die off. Synaptic pruning therefore unfolds according to the “use it or lose it” principle Mind Enhancing Tools? As a result of repeated engagements in cultural tasks, relevant brain pathways undergo substantial rewiring. Cortical plasticity therefore allows us to self-engineer our minds and our brains become geared to work in partnership with external props. Slaying the Chimera SSDs thus exploit the remarkable opportunism afforded by neural plasticity to give rise to augmented processes of deep bio- technological symbiosis We have two mappings. First mapping: Vision - > Audition/Touch. Second mapping: Audition/Touch - > New Sensory Mode of Access. Extended Cognition or Extended Cognitive Systems ? We explain this acquired perception in terms of production of novel law-like relations between actions and associated changes in sensory input. Through these active couplings we acquire a new sense, which might give rise to what could be called a kind of “artificial synaesthesia” SSDs augment our perception in a qualitative way. These devices become mind enhancing tools and therefore different but complementary parts of our cognitive repertoire Extending our minds enhances our capacities and allows us to transform and augment our cognitive processes in a way that wouldn’t be possible without incorporating the external resources into our cognitive routines Do SSDs merely replace one sensory modality with another? Or are they delivering us a new form of perceiving and experiencing? Can the use of SSDs be explained purely internally, in terms of cross-modal mappings within the brain? We discuss sensory substitution devices (SSDs) as an example of a tool that gets incorporated into a cognitive routine in a way that extends the mind The active user is the agent + tool working together as an entangled system of cognitive analysis A cognitive system may have among its parts, components that are located in the external environment. However it doesn’t follow that the contribution these components are making to the overall cognitive system is a cognitive one SSDs are causally necessary for augmented perception but do they count as cogntiive? Can SSDs establish anything stronger than causal necessity? The loss of a sensory input induces an invasion of the deprived cortical area by inputs originating from other modalities In sensory substitution, information acquired with one sensory modality is used to accomplish a task which is normally sub- served by another sensory modality This happens because of the plasticity of our brains. Cortical Plasticity , we argue, is a precondition for extended cognition Our brains do not have a fixed functional architecture, but are sculpted and given form by the practices we repeatedly engage in The intermodal connections that arise result from a phenomenon called cross-modal plasticity . The capacity of the brain to form these inter-modal connections is exploited by SSDs. When we actively use SSDs our plastic brains factor them into the processing of perceptual information In SSD perception, sensorimotor contingencies(SMCs) from vision, touch and audition are merged together to form a robust and coherent percept Crucially, this cross-modal perception differs from any kind we normally enjoy when we are not using an SSD. We then have an active agent + tool working together to deliver something new. What is delivered is the mastery of novel SMCs that yield a new mode of access to the world. A mode that provides the users with a new sense. We only get cross-modal mapping when brain and tool work in partnership together This is what we find in the case of inactive user [where the agent and tool are detached]. This isn't however sufficient for cross-modal mapping! This is a case of extended cognition, not just an extended cognitive system. Causal dependence suggests that SSD perception is just the agent + tool without agent and tool forming a single system. We argue that only active users can experience this form of augmented perception. Inactive users just get stimulation from the device but no cross-modal mapping. If perceivers using SSDs count as extended cognitive systems why the experiences they enjoy shouldn’t be counted as extended conscious experiences?

Poster Barcelona (Workshop on Embodied, Distributed and Extended Cognition)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Poster Barcelona (Workshop on Embodied, Distributed and Extended Cognition)

8/7/2019 Poster Barcelona (Workshop on Embodied, Distributed and Extended Cognition)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/poster-barcelona-workshop-on-embodied-distributed-and-extended-cognition 1/1

ntal states & cognitive functions have beengued to extend beyond the skin of the organismh biological and environmentally locatedments entering into a partnership that enablesxible thinking and acting.

EMT and Complementarity

We defend acomplementarity

version of theextended mind

according to whichexternally located

resources and internalbiological elementsmake a different but

complementary

causal contribution tobringing about

intelligent behaviour

SSDs and Plasticity

lasticity and Culture: the Magic Duo

t is the activities we participate in the world thattermine which neural circuits get to survive in our

brains. Circuits that are often used duringdevelopment get reinforced, while those that lie

dormant are simply abandoned and theirconnections die off.

Synaptic pruning therefore unfoldsaccording to the “use it or lose it” principle 

Mind Enhancing Tools?

a result of repeated engagements in cultural tasks,vant brain pathways undergo substantial rewiring.tical plasticity therefore allows us to self-engineerr minds and our brains become geared to work in

partnership with external props.

Slaying the ChimeraSSDs thus exploit theremarkable opportunism

afforded by neural plasticityto give rise to augmentedprocesses of deep bio-technological symbiosis

We have two mappings.

First mapping: Vision - >Audition/Touch. Second

mapping: Audition/Touch - >New Sensory Mode of Access.

Extended Cognition or ExtendedCognitive Systems ?

We explain this acquired perception in terms of production ofnovel law-like relations between actions and associated

changes in sensory input. Through these active couplings weacquire a new sense, which might give rise to what could be

called a kind of “artificial synaesthesia”

SSDs augment our perception in a qualitativeway. These devices become mind enhancing

tools and therefore different but complementaryparts of our cognitive repertoire 

xtending our minds enhances our capacities andows us to transform and augment our cognitivecesses in a way that wouldn’t be possible without

rporating the external resources into our cognitiveroutines 

Do SSDs merely replace one sensory modality withanother? Or are they delivering us a new form of

perceiving and experiencing?

Can the use of SSDs be explained purely internallyin terms of cross-modal mappings within the brain?

We discuss sensory substitution devices(SSDs) as an example of a tool that gets

incorporated into a cognitive routine in a waythat extends the mind

The active user is the agent + tool working together an entangled system of cognitive analysis

A cognitive system mayhave among its parts,components that are

located in the externalenvironment. However idoesn’t follow that the

contribution these

components are makingto the overall cognitive

system is a cognitive on

SSDs are causally necessary for augmentedperception but do they count as cogntiive?

Can SSDs establish anything stronger thancausal necessity?

The loss of a sensory input induces an invasion of thedeprived cortical area by inputs originating from other

modalities

In sensory substitution, informationacquired with one sensory modality is usedto accomplish a task which is normally sub-

served by another sensory modality

This happens because of the plasticity of ourbrains. Cortical Plasticity, we argue, is a

precondition for extended cognition

Our brains do not have a fixed functionalarchitecture, but are sculpted and given form

by the practices we repeatedly engage in

The intermodal connections that arise result from aphenomenon called cross-modal plasticity. The capacity ofthe brain to form these inter-modal connections is exploited

by SSDs. When we actively use SSDs our plastic brainsfactor them into the processing of perceptual information

In SSD perception,sensorimotor

contingencies(SMCs)from vision, touch andaudition are mergedtogether to form a

robust and coherentpercept

Crucially, thiscross-modal

perception differsfrom any kind wenormally enjoy

when we are notusing an SSD.

We then have an active agent+ tool working together to

deliver something new. What isdelivered is the mastery of

novel SMCs that yield a newmode of access to the world. Amode that provides the users

with a new sense.

We only get cross-modal mapping when brain

and tool work in partnership together

This is what we find in the case ofinactive user [where the agent and

tool are detached]. This isn'thowever sufficient for cross-modal

mapping!

This is a case of extended cognition,not just an extended cognitive system.

Causal dependence suggests thatSSD perception is just the agent +

tool without agent and tool forming asingle system.

We argue that only active users can experience thisform of augmented perception. Inactive users just ge

stimulation from the device but no cross-modalmapping.

If perceivers using SSDs count as extendedcognitive systems why the experiences they

enjoy shouldn’t be counted as extended

conscious experiences?