Post-Sendong IDP Assessment Fina l Document

7/29/2019 Post-Sendong IDP Assessment Fina l Document

1/21

RATIONALE

This particular study on the post-Sendong assessment of the status of

internally-displaced persons in six relocations sites in iligan city isdesigned to provide relevant data and information needed bydevelopment stakeholders in designing appropriate plans andformulating development interventions in addressing the priority needsof IDPs in the present relocation sites in Iligan City. This study is alsoconducted in order to identify, determine and showcase how the physicalneeds (land, shelter, water, waste disposal system, energy andinfrastructure); socio-economic needs (livelihood, mobility, accessibility,source of income, health and security); and environmental needs(disaster risk management and environmental programs) of IDPS arebeing responded by stakeholders and the internally-displaced persons as

beneficiaries of the different projects.

This study also intends to propose recommendations that may providerelevant insights as to how to address the needs of IDPs, and whataction plans are to be adopted and implemented in said relocation sites.The results of this study can also be used as objective tools for analysisand decision-making among stakeholders in the event that futuredevelopment programs will be implemented in said resettlement sites.

Formulation and preparation of survey tools, administration of surveyinstruments and other requirements of this study were made and

conducted by the personnel of the Iligan Medical Center College andLIHUK, Inc., in partnership with the Partnership for Philippine SupportService Agency, Inc.

The research team was composed of a panel of researchers, namely; Dr.

Helen S. Tejero and Jose Dennis O. Mancia from the Research and

Extension Program of the Iligan Medical Center College; Esmeralda R.

Padagas, Arthur Homillano, Jr., Merie V. Zuero, Rufino N. Gonzada and

Alice C. Servento from the Lig-ong Hiniusang Kusog, Inc.

The urgency of coming up with a post-Sendong assessment report on the

status of IDPs in the six resettlement sites has led the researchers tofocus their attention on the different subjects in order to come with up

appropriate data and information needed for development planning and

determination of appropriate interventions.

Thus, the idea of coming up with an assessment report was collectively

presented and approved, and thereafter, research planning, including


2/21

assigning of individual tasks, were conducted. Particular and specific

assignments were given to individual members of the research team to

focus on particular research subjects.

INTRODUCTION

A tropical depression east of Mindanao entered the Philippine Area ofResponsibility (PAR) at 10:00 a.m. on December 15, 2011 and wasnamed Sendong (international code name: Washi). At 4:00 p.m.,December 15, 2011, Sendong intensified into a tropical storm as itmoved closer to northeastern Mindanao. Public warning storm signal(PSWS) No. 1 was hoisted by PAGASA over Visayas and Mindanao. At

10:00p.m. on December 15, 2011, tropical storm Sendong maintainedits strength as it increased its threat to northeastern Mindanao andeastern Visayas area. PSWS No. 2was raised over Visayas and Mindanaowhile PSWS No. 1 over some parts of Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao. At4:00 a.m. on December 16, 2011, tropical storm Sendong has sloweddown slightly as it continued to threaten northeastern Mindanao andeastern Visayas area. At 10:00 a.m. on December 16, 2011, tropicalstorm Sendong has slowed down slightly as it continued to threatennortheastern Mindanao and eastern Visayas area. PSWS No. 2 was raisedover Visayas and Mindanao while PSWS No. 1 over Palawan, Cuyo Island,Visayas and Mindanao.

At 4:00 p.m. on December 16, 2011, tropical storm Sendong madelandfall in the vicinity of Hinatuan, Surigao del Sur. PSWS No. 2 wasraised over Mindanao while PSWS No. 1 over Palawan, Visayas andMindanao. At 10:00 p.m. on December 16, 2011, tropical stormSendong maintained its strength and was now in the vicinity ofMalaybalay City, Bukidnon. The location of the center as of 4:00 a.m. onDecember 17, 2011 was 20 km west northwest of Cagayan de Oro City atcoordinates 8.4 N, 124.4 E. (NDRRMC, January 2010).


3/21

Fig. 1. Flood Susceptibility Map of Parts of Iligan City. (photo courtesy of

DENR MGB 10)

Tropical Storm Sendong unleashed its fury, destroying with great damage

the cities of Iligan and Cagayan de Oro, including other areas in

Mindanao and the Visayas. The destruction caused by the flood,

aggravated by thousand of logs carried downstream by the rampaging

flood waters, did not only wrought havoc to properties and caused

massive displacement to more than 20,000 families in more than 34

barangays, but also caused tremendous deaths of thousand of residents

living along river communities in Mandulog.

Fig. 2. Thousands of logs carried downstream Fig. 3. A house in


4/21

Bayug Island buried by soil and logs.

during Sendong.

The Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) based in

Iligan City recorded 1,232 individual deaths, of which 566 were stillmissing. In terms of damages, the same agency reported at least 7,911

houses were totally destroyed and 14,874 were partially destroyed. Most

of these houses were located along riverbanks in Brgys. Mandulog, Upper

and Lower Hinaplanon, Pugaan, Digkilaan, Tambacan, Santiago, Sta.

Felomina, San Roque, Tubod, Abuno and Tipanoy.

The same report has also estimated that 22,522 families were affected

or roughly 101,337 individual population of the citys 322,821 total

population were rendered homeless and are still dependent on relief

goods and resettlement programs of international humanitarianorganizations and by the local government. At present, there are 14

transitory (or temporary) shelters or bunkhouses that are being occupied

by 560 families. On the other hand, as of January 2013, there are six

permanent shelters that were established by the GMA Kapuso in Brgy.

Mandulog; by the Gawad Kalinga and Habitat for Humanity in Brgy. Sta.

Elena; by the Red Cross in Digkilaan; by the Deus est Caritas in Brgys.

Upper Tominobo and Dalipuga; and by the Diocese of Iligan in Brgy.

Luinab. The local government of Iligan has received from local, national

and international humanitarian donors Php___ million of cash donations

intended for Sendong victims and survivors.

LOCATION AND ACCESSIBILITY

Iligan City, once described as the Industrial City of the South islocated approximately 89 kilometers southwest of Cagayan de Oro City,and lies along the eastern coast of the province of Lanao del Norte.Geographically, it lies within coordinates 8 13 36 North latitude and124 14 30 East longitude and is bounded by Iligan Bay to the west, theMunicipality of Lugait, Misamis Oriental to the north, the municipalities ofBaloi, Linamon and Tagoloan, Lanao del Norte to the south and theprovinces of Lanao del Sur and Bukidnon to the east. It boast a total landarea of 81,337 hectares which is divided into 44 barangays. Iligan City iseasily accessible by land and sea transportation.


5/21

Fig. 4. Aerial view of Iligan City Fig. 5.

Location map of Iligan City (Google)

The Integrated Bus and Jeepney Terminal (IBJT) caters trips to and fromCagayan de Oro City and various parts of Misamis Oriental, while theSouthbound Bus and Jeepney Terminal caters trips to and from DipologCity, Pagadian City, Ozamiz City, various parts of Lanao del Norte andLanao del Sur, Including Cotabato and the rest of central Mindanao. Thecity has appropriate port facilities that enable it to cater to variouspassenger shipping lines to different destinations including Manila, Cebu,Bacolod, Ilo-ilo, Dumaguete and Ozamiz City.

TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE

Iligan City is characterized by a narrow coastal plain bordered to thesouth and east by hilly terrain representing the footslopes of the ruggedmountain peaks farther inland. The coastal plain is relatively flat to gentlyrolling with elevations rarely exceeding 20 meters above sea level (masl).Towards the highlands, the terrain is rolling to moderately steep withslopes ranging from 5 to 15%. Farther inland, the high and ruggedmountain ranges appear with elevations varying from 500 masl to morethan 1,000 masl.

About 63% of Iligan Citys 81,337 has. land area have slopes of over 30%.Only about 2% have slopes of 0 3%, 15% fall between 3-18% and the

remaining 20% are within 18-30%.Iligan City is mainly drained by the Mandulog, Iligan-Pugaan and AgusRivers, their numerous tributaries, some smaller water bodies and man-made creeks. These rivers drain their loads toward Iligan Bay.

The two major river systems, the Mandulog and the Iligan-Pugaan, cutacross the coastal plain and serve as the main regional outflow of thecity. The Iligan-Pugaan River basin is approximately 250 km2 wide. The


6/21

floodplain has about a 200-meter wide channel and an average depth of5 m measured from the top of the alluvial terrace. In some cases, erosionand scouring of riverbanks occur.

Fig. 6. Mandulog River before sending Fig. 7.Mandulog River after Sendong

During the dry season, the stream flow follows a narrow path on theriverbed. On days of extreme precipitation, the river usually overflows,causing flooding in the city. Mandulog River lies about 5 km north of theheart of Iligan City. It has an estimated area of more than550 km2. The river flows in a westerly direction and empties its load intoIligan Bay. From the mouth up to approximately 3 kms inland, the riverflows in a 100-m wide bed with a deeper channel. Mandulog River is

susceptible to severe flooding and riverbank erosion. River discharge isgreater than that of Iligan River.

Based on aerial photographs taken on different years, Mandulog Rivercontinuously changes its course. In aerial photos taken in the 1950s,Mandulog River charted a northerly course as it drained into Iligan Bay.At present, and possibly since the late eighties, the river flows westerlyinto Bayug before it discharges in the same bay.

CLIMATE AND VEGETATION

The climate in Iligan City belongs to Type III of the Modified CoronasClimate Classification of the Philippine Atmospheric Geophysical andAstronomical Services Administration (PAGASA). It is characterized by ashort dry period of one to three months, where rainfall is not verypronounced, relatively dry from November to April, and wet during the


7/21

rest of the year. Heavy rains usually occur in the months of January,February, June, September, and December. Annual average temperatureis 27.4C.

The predominant vegetative cover consists of coconut groves andbanana plantations which are found in plateaus and other lowlands aswell as in slopes and highlands. Heavy tropical forests are found in slopesof 30% and greater and these are mostly located inland. A few swampyareas covered with marsh grass are within the barangays of Del Carmenand Bagong Silang. Some fruit trees such as mango, durian, jackfruit andtropical hardwood like lauan, molave, apitong, etc., are scattered incultivated areas in the hinterland barangays.

AFFECTED BARANGAYS

A team from the DENR MGB Region 10 conducted a rapid assessment ofparts of some of the most affected barangays in Iligan City caused bytropical storm Sendong. The team assessed Barangay Santiago, all thepuroks in Bayug Island in Barangay Hinaplanon and the four puroks inBarangay Sta. Filomena adjacent to Bayug Island. Barangays Hinaplanonand Sta. Filomena are connected through a spillway.

Fig. 8. Orchid Homes totally devastated by Sendong Fig. 9. Properties

totally flooded in Brgy. Santiago

According to the report, Barangay Santiago is composed of 21 puroks. Ithas a total land area of 110,419 has. with a population of about 8,124.(Profile of Barangay Santiago, 2008?) The entire Barangay Santiago wasinundated on December 17, 2011 brought about by the effects of tropicalstorm Sendong. However, damages varied from purok to purok. Theworst-hit puroks are those adjacent to the river mouth of Mandulog River(Puroks 7, 6, 13), as well as those adjacent to creeks and other


8/21

tributaries. These creeks are either active, intermittent, or dry river/creekbed. These puroks include 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8.

The puroks which did not suffer massive damage include Puroks 1

(boundary with Brgy. Tibanga), 9, 10, 11, and 12. However, these purokswere also all flooded, with som portions in Purok 9 which happen to bevacant lots. Portions of Brgy. Santiago was a former mangrove area.Further, these were reportedly created out of garbage deposits. TheIligan City High School Annex in Purok 5B was inundated by 1.15m floods.This is about 85 meters from the coast. It is also adjacent to thedumpsite.

Floodwaters in the badly-damaged Cabili Village Elementary School inPurok 3 reached 2 meters. The GK Village in Purok 4 experienced 2.5 mfloods. The team also made and assessment in Puroks Duranta A,Duranta B, San Francisco and Ilang-Ilang in Brgy. Sta. Felomena.Floodwaters reached more than 4 meters within this vicinity. Thesepuroks are situated atop a dry riverbed.

Fig. 10. Floodmark (red arrow) in Purok Ilang-ilang, Fig. 11. One of the school buildings in Brgy.

Brgy. Sta, Felomena was measured at 4.25 m. Santiago destroyed by Sendong. Flood height(Photos courtesy of MGB10) reached 2.6 m (marked with red arrow)

In Brgy. Hinaplanon, the DENR MGB team assessed Puroks 1 to 9, all inBayug Island. This island is in the junction of Mandulog River and BayugCreek. Scouring is evident along the riverbank. The entire Bayug Island

was heavily inundated, from 1.5 meters (Purok 5, near the coast) to 3meters (Purok 7). The old map shows what is now known as the rivermouth of Mandulog River was formerly only a creek known as BayugCreek.

However, the former northern segment of Mandulog River has sincebecome heavily silted and is what is known today as Bayug Creek. This


9/21

heavy sedimentation has resulted in the change of the course of theMandulog River.

ROLES OF STAKEHOLDERS IN ADDRESSING THE NEEDS FOR SHELTER

Confronted with the serious challenge to immediately respond the need

of providing relief and relocation for flood victims, the Local Inter-Agency

Committee (LIAC), whose membership include the LGU; the different

United Nations agencies; international humanitarian organizations; Office

of the Civil Defense; national government agencies; and local non-

government organizations, was organized by virtue of Executive Order

No. ___ signed and approved by Mayor Lawrence Lluch Cruz in ___ 2011.

The Local Inter-Agency Committee (LIAC) is tasked with drawing up

appropriate plans and crafting policies for the development of the

resettlement sites as viable, self-sustaining communities through

participatory engagement of all stakeholders. The LIAC will ensure that

housing units in the LGU and other resettlement sites are awarded to

qualified beneficiaries. LIAC is also tasked to confirm qualified

beneficiaries identified by the Beneficiaries Selection, Arbitration and

Awards Committee of other forms of shelter assistance.

The LIAC has the following four Sub-Committees, namely; the BeneficiarySelection, Arbitration and Awards Committee; Social Preparation

Committee; Site Selection Committee; Relocation and Transfer

Committee.


10/21

Fig.12. A once thriving community totally washed out Fig. 13. School building,

church, gymnasiums has becomeand devastated by Typhoon Sendong. Immediate evacuation

centers for Sendong survivors.

In general, the duties and responsibilities of the LIAC is to serve as the

over-all coordinating body for the entire disposition process of the

resettlement sites of the LGU; formulate and adopt the necessary rules

and guidelines for land acquisition and for the selection of beneficiaries;

come up with a schematic work plan that will expedite the disposition of

the property to the beneficiaries;approve the masterlist of the qualified

beneficiaries; identify resources and develop systems and procedures forresource mobilization and project implementation; decide on all issues

and concerns affecting the implementation of the project; solicit the

participation and expertise of other public and private sector

organizations, including international organizations, for the effective

implementation of theproject.


11/21

Fig. 14. LIAC meeting discussing the status of IDPs in the Fig. 15. Mayor

Lawrence Cruz signing MOA with

relocation sites in Iligan City (Photo courtesy of HRO) representatives

of Habitat for Humanity (Photo

courtesy

of HRO)

1. The Local Government Unit (LGU)

The LIAC also defines the roles and responsibilities of member-agencies.

As such, the Local Government of Iligan City shall serve as Chair of the

LIAC; convene the LIAC to a meeting as often as necessary for the

purpose of planning, coordinating, assessing and monitoring the activities

in the resettlement sites; monitor the activities of the various member-

agencies and organizations under the LIAC relative to the implementationof the disposition of the LGU resettlement sites to qualified beneficiaries;

call on any national government department or agency for assistance

whenever necessary; assist in the formulation of the guidelines for the

disposition of the subject property and in the selection of beneficiaries;

oversee the implementation of the disposition process of the housing

units; coordinate with the various concerned government agencies,

bureaus and instrumentalities, including private sector organizations;

conduct the necessary surveys: boundary, structural, subdivision,

topographic as needed for planning and design of the sites;approve allPlans of the Resettlement Site Development Plans as prepared by the

Technical team of the LGU;secure all necessary permits and clearances

for project implementation; keep track of the progress of project

implementation in the resettlement sites and prescribed corrective

measures to the concerned agencies if necessary; accept the Project


12/21

upon completion and provide the necessary maintenance and repair of

the project.

2. The National Housing Authority (NHA)

The National Housing Authority shall serve as the Vice-Chair of the LIAC;

assist in the formulation of the guidelines for the disposition of the

housing units and in the selection of beneficiaries; undertake social

preparation activities in coordination with the concerned government

agencies as well as with the POs in the resettlement sites; assist in the

validation of Master List in close coordination with the DSWD, LGU of

Iligan City, PCUP, NGO and the concerned IDP representatives/POs.

3. The Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR)

The Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) shall

facilitate the issuance of Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) and

GIR and monitor compliance with the conditions stipulated in the said

ECC; review and verify LGU-submitted relocation, topographic and

subdivision surveys of the resettlement sites, including computation of

the technical description based on applicable land use and approved

subdivision scheme; facilitate the verification and approval of subdivision

survey of the area; facilitate the approval of the boundary and

subdivision plan and technical descriptions.


13/21

4. The Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH)

The Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) shall provide

funds and undertake the land development in accordance with the

approved plan of all LGU and other identified resettlement sites; ensure

the completion of the tasks given within the timeline in coordination with

the Project Management Team overseeing the development of the

projects.

5. The Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD)

The Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) shall

provide assistance on the conduct of social preparation activities such as

dialogues, consultations, etc.; assist in the conduct of master list

validation in coordination with NHA, LGU of Iligan City, PCUP, concerned

NGOs and IDPs/POs; assist in the formulation of the guidelines for the


14/21

disposition of the housing units and in selection of beneficiaries; provide

other programs and projects for the benefit of the IDPs/Pos.

6. The Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council (HUDCC)

The Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council (HUDCC) shall

assist in the formulation of the guidelines for the disposition of the

housing units in the LGU resettlement sites and in the selection of

beneficiaries in coordination with the concerned agencies, NGOs and

IDPs/POs; monitor the implementation of the projects.

7. The Presidential Commission for the Urban Poor (PCUP)

The Presidential Commission for the Urban Poor (PCUP) shall provide

assistance on the conduct of social preparation activities such as

dialogues, consultations, etc.; assist in the conduct of master list

validation in coordination with DSWD, NHA, LGU of Iligan City, concerned

Barangay LGU, concerned NGOs and IDPs/POs; assist in the formulation

of the guidelines for the disposition of the subject property and in

selection of beneficiaries; accredit urban poor organizations operating in

the Resettlement sites; facilitate the process of representation of the

IDPs/POs and in the LIAC.

8 . Representatives of the IDPs, Peoples Organizations (PO), and

NGOs/Civil Society


15/21

Representatives of the IDPs, Peoples Organizations (PO), and NGOs/Civil

Society shall participate in the formulation of the guidelines for the

disposition of the housing units and in the selection of the beneficiaries;participate in the conduct of community relations, social preparation and

information dissemination activities including the drawing up of the

development plan; participate in the decision-making process over

matters involving the protection and promotion of their legitimate

collective interest; participate and ensure the smooth transfer of the

beneficiaries to the resettlement site, and apply for accreditation with

PCUP and registration with HLURB.

Status of Shelter Needs of IDPs

The Beneficiary Selection, Arbitration and Awards Committee (BSAAC) of

the LIAC came up in September 11, 2012 a status report regarding the

shelter needs of IDPs mostly affected by Sendong. Table 1. shows the

total number of IDPs needing permanent shelters; the number of IDPs

processed by BSAAC; and the number of qualified and disqualified IDPs

after series of assessment and selection activities.

TOTAL NO. OF IDPs NEEDING PERMANENT

SHELTERS

7,911

NUMBER OF IDPs PROCESSED BY BSAAC 2,113NUMBER OF DISQUALIFIED IDPs 262NUMBER OF QUALIFIED IDPs 1,851

Table 1. Number of shelters needs of IDPs (Source: BSAAC Evaluation

report, as of January 2013)

The BSAAC also reported the areas and the total shelter requirements of

IDPs whose houses were totally and partially damaged, and those which

were flooded. Table 2 describe these information as follows.


16/21

AREAS TOTAL SHELTER

REQUIREMENTDANGER ZONES (totally,

partially flooded)

5,841

NON-DANGER ZONES (totally

damaged)

2,070

TOTAL 7,911 Table 2. Status of shelter requirements of IDPs in areas identified asdanger and non-danger zones

needing shelter requirement. Source: BSAAC Evaluation

Report, January 2013.

The same BSSAC report also identified the danger and non-danger zones

where totally, partially damaged and flooded houses were located. In the

areas covering the non-danger zones, 2,070 houses were totally

damaged; 3,597 houses were partially damaged, and 9409 were flooded,

with a total number of 15,076 houses affected .

On the other hand, in areas classified as danger zones, 2,377 houses

were totally damaged; 2,289 were partially damaged and 1,125 were

flooded, with a total of 5,841 number of houses affected. To sum up,

there were about 15,076 houses which were flooded; 5,841 houses both


17/21

partially and totally damaged, with a total of 20,917 houses totally

affected by Typhoon Sendong.

In January 2013, the LIAC submitted a Relocation Project Updates basedon on-site accomplishments of housing project being undertaken in allrelocation sites. However, for purposes of this particular study, only six(6) relocation sites are included in the assessment.

A Resettlement Action Plan for Transitory IDPs now sheltered in varioustransitory shelters was also drawn up by the LIAC for planning

considerations.

TRANSITORY CENTER LOCATIONNO. OFOCCUPA

NTS

PLACES OFTRANSFER

DATE OFTRANSFE

R

1. Luinab Gym 1 Luinab 30Bayanihan Village, Sta.ElenaBay Vista Village,Dalipuga

Jan-March2013

2. RASFI Luinab 27 Bay Vista Village,

Dalipuga

Jan-March2013

3. ATI Building Upper

Hinaplanon

30Bayanihan Village, Sta.Elena

Upper HinaplanonVillage

Jan-March2013

4. ATI Bunkhouse Upper

Hinaplanon40

Bayanihan Village, Sta.ElenaUpper HinaplanonVillage

Jan-March2013

5. IBJT Tent

Tambo

28

Iligan Bay Vista Village,Dalipuga

Jan-March2013

6. Dy Property Pala-o

109

Bayanihan Village, Sta.ElenaBay Vista Village,Dalipuga

Jan-March2013

7. Mandulog IOM Mandulog 25GMA Kapuso Village,Phase 1 & 2, Mandulog

Jan-March2013

8. Mandulog CRS Mandulog 63GMA Kapuso Village,Phase 1 & 2, Mandulog

Jan-March2013

9. Sta. Elena Bunkhouse Sta. Elena 27Bayanihan Village, Sta.ElenaBay Vista Village,Dalipuga

Jan-March2013

10. Upper TominoboBunkhouse Upper Tominobo 43

Caritas Village, UpperTominobo

Jan-March2013

11. Bagong Silang IOM Bagong Silang 59Bayanihan Village, Sta.Elena

Jan-March2013


18/21

Bay Vista Village,Dalipuga

12. Bagong Silang CRS Bagong Silang40 Bayanihan Village, Sta.

ElenaBay Vista Village,

Dalipuga

Jan-March2013

13. San Roque CRS San Roque24 Bayanihan Village, Sta.

ElenaBay Vista Village,Dalipuga

Jan-March2013

14. MSU-IIT Coop UpperHinaplanon

40

Bayanihan Village, Sta.ElenaBay Vista Village,DalipugaUpper HinaplanonVillage

Jan-March2013

15. Upper Hinaplanon UpperHinaplanon

29 Bayanihan Village, Sta.Elena

Jan-March2013

Table 4. List showing transitory centers; location; no. of occupants; places oftransfer and date of transfer as reported by the Housing and Resettlement Office (HRO).

A Relocation Project Monitoring Updates

NAME OF PROJECT AREA

(has.)

CLASSIFI-CATION

NO. OFPROJEC

TEDUNITS

NO. OF HOUSESTOTAL

STATUSON-GOIN

G

COMPLETED

1. Red CrossVillage,

Brgy. Digkilaan

3 Off-

Site

320 - 320 320JV Red Cross,320 units

occupied2. BayanihanVillage,

Brgy. Sta. Elena15.9 Off-

Site1,712 513 861 1,37

4

JV GK, Habitat,PICE674 unitsoccupied

3. Deus caritasVillage,

Brgy. UpperTominobo

8 Off-Site

400 32 141 173JV Diocese,124unitsoccupied

4. Deus CaritasEstVillage, 5 Off- 280 - 280 280

JV Diocese, 280units


19/21

Brgy. UpperLuinab

Site Occupied

5. GMA KapusoVillage,

Brgy. Mandulog3 Off-

Site200 60 60 120

JV GMAKapuso,60 units

occupied6. Deus CaritasVillage

Brgy. Dalipuga3 Off-

Site25 - 25 25

Diocese, 25unitsoccupied

TOTAL 37.9 2,973 605 1,678 2,292

1,483 unitsoccupied

Table 3. A comparative report on Relocation Project Monitoring Updatessubmitted by LIAC to LGU. (Source: LIAC)

STATUS OF IDPs IN SIX (6) RESETTLEMENT SITES

Specific Location and Geography

NAME OFRELOCATION

SITES

GEOGRAPHICAL AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICSLOCATION ELEVATI

ON(masl)

SLOPE SOILTYPE

(original)

CLIMATE

1. Red Cross Village,Brgy.

Digkilaan,Iligan City +

50m

10-15degrees Sandy

loam

Type3Corona

classification

2. Bayanihan Village,Brgy.

Sta. Elena,Iligan City

+20m

10-15degrees Clay loam

Type3Corona

classification

3. Deus Caritas Village,

Brgy.

Upper

Tominobo,Iligan City

+100m

30-40

degrees Clay loam

Type3

Coronaclassification

4. Deus Caritas Village,Brgy.

Luinab, IliganCity +100m

15-20degrees Limestone

Type3Corona

classification

5. GMA Kapuso Village,Brgy.

Mandulog,Iligan City +50m

10-15degrees

Boulders,sand/gravel

Type3Corona

classification


Dalipuga,Iligan City +

200m

40-45degrees Limestone

Type3Corona

classification

Table 5. Estimated calculation of geographical and physical characteristicsof resettlement sites

based on actual ocular surveys.


20/21

Geo-Hazard Vulnerability and Risk, and Security Risks Assessment

NAME OF RELOCATIONSITES

GEOHAZARDVULNERABILITY RISK

ASSESSMENT

SECURITY RISKASSESSMENT

FLOOD

LANDSLIDE

EARTHQUAKE

ARMEDCONFLI

CT

ANTI-SOCIAL

ACTIVITY

TRIBALCONFLI

CT


Digkilaan, Iligan CityHIGH MEDIUM LOW LOW MEDIUM

LOW TOMEDIUM


Sta. Elena, Iligan CityHIGH LOW

LOW TOMEDIUM LOW LOW LOW

3. Deus Caritas Village,

Brgy.Upper Tominobo,

Iligan City

LOW HIGH MEDIUM LOW LOW LOW


Luinab, Iligan CityLOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW

5. GMA Kapuso Village,Brgy.

Mandulog, Iligan CityHIGH MEDIUM LOW MEDIU

MMEDIUM

MEDIUMTO HIGH


Dalipuga, Iligan CityLOW HIGH HIGH LOW LOW LOW

Table 6. A table showing the geohazard vulnerability and hazards status, and

security risk assessment of IDPs In thesix resettlement sites in Iligan City.

Land use Allocation

NAME OF RELOCATIONSITES

LAND USE ALLOCATIONAREA(HAS.)

AVE. LOTAREA PER

HOUSING UNIT

FLOORAREA

OPENSPACE

EASEMENTAND

ROADNETWORKS


Digkilaan, Iligan City3 sq. mtrs. mtrs.


Sta. Elena, Iligan City15.9 sq. mtrs. mtrs.


Upper Tominobo,Iligan City

8 sq. mtrs. mtrs

4. Deus Caritas Village,Brgy. 5 sq. mtrs. mtrs


21/21

Luinab, Iligan City5. GMA Kapuso Village,Brgy.

Mandulog, Iligan City3 sq. mtrs. mtrs

6. Deus Caritas Village,Brgy.Dalipuga, Iligan City

3 sq. mtrs. Mtrs.

Documents

Post-Sendong IDP Assessment Fina l Document