7

Click here to load reader

Post Project Review

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Post Project Review

POST PROJECT REVIEW

KEADUE WWTP UPGRADE WORKS

KMCF ENGINEERING

DUBLIN ROAD

ATHLONE

2014

Page 2: Post Project Review

Table of Contents 1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 1

2.0 PROJECT TEAM AND STAFFING ................................................................................................... 1 3.0 PROJECT DELIVERABLES (PLANNED VS. ACTUAL) ..................................................................... 2 4.0 PROJECT COSTS .......................................................................................................................... 3 5.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE ................................................................................................................... 4

Page 3: Post Project Review

1

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY

KMCF Engineering recently completed the Keadue waste water treatment plant upgrades work Project. This marks the end of a difficult but successful project for KMCF Engineering. The objective of this project was to upgrade the current WWTP situated in Keadue County Roscommon. The purpose of this upgrade works was to coincide with the population increase in Keadue and to also comply with current EPA standards.

The scope of the Keadue WWTP Upgrade Works project is to develop a tender selection system for the planned development of the existing WWTP. This system is then to be used as the basis for the development of a generic system which may then be tailored and used in all future works of a similar nature.

2.0 PROJECT TEAM AND STAFFING

The Keadue WWTP upgrade works Project consisted of a skilled and knowledgeable team. The chart below provides information about KMCF Engineering Project team members:

Name Title Contact

A. Mark O’Reilly Project manager A.m.o’[email protected]

B. Ken Geelan Design Engineer [email protected]

C. Cathal Fitzpatrick Design Engineer [email protected]

D. Mouhanad

Cherbatji

Implementation

Manager

[email protected]

E. Farah Liyana

Azman

Research &

Development

Manager

[email protected]

KMCF Engineering project team members utilized standard project management methodologies to successfully complete the project. Effective communication, detailed planning, stakeholder involvement, project management tools, and organizational structure all played key roles in the project’s success. Staffing lessons from previous projects were used in building the project team. Rather than allocate too many resources, as some past projects have done, the KMCF team was staffed with one resource per development area. The project sponsor made clear to the project manager that if any additional resources were required, they must be requested through standard channels and the impact on project cost and schedule would need to be defined.

Page 4: Post Project Review

2

3.0 PROJECT DELIVERABLES (PLANNED VS. ACTUAL)

The Keadue WWTP upgrades works Project has been completed successfully. There were planned deliverables for each phase of this project as well as for the completed product. This section highlights the planned deliverables and compares them to actual deliverables as they occurred.

Keadue WWTP (Feasibility Study)

Planned Deliverable Actual Deliverable Summary

Carry out a feasibility study on WWTP systems based on cost, P.E and discharge performances etc.

Carry out a feasibility study on WWTP systems based on cost, P.E and discharge performances etc.

This deliverable was completed as planned

Keadue WWTP (Schedule of works)

Planned Deliverable Actual Deliverable Summary

Develop a detailed works and construction schedule of the chosen tender option

Develop a detailed works and construction schedule of the chosen tender option

This deliverable was completed as planned

Keadue WWTP (Construction Schedule)

Planned Deliverable Actual Deliverable Summary

Develop a detailed works and construction schedule of the chosen tender option

Develop a detailed works and construction schedule of the chosen tender option

This deliverable was completed as planned

Keadue WWTP (A performance management system)

Planned Deliverable Actual Deliverable Summary

Develop a system that must be capable of monitoring the ongoing performance of the project in relation to cost and schedule.

Develop a system that must be capable of monitoring the ongoing performance of the project in relation to cost and schedule.

This deliverable was completed as planned

Page 5: Post Project Review

3

Keadue WWTP (All associated project management documentation & Project Completion)

Planned Deliverable Actual Deliverable Summary

All associated project management documentations must be adhered to and completed throughout the course of this project

All associated project management documentations must be adhered to and completed throughout the course of this project

This deliverable was completed as planned

The end product must be sufficient of managing all wastewater requirements for the Keadue are and meet all relevant environmental legislation.

The end product must be sufficient of managing all wastewater requirements for the Keadue are and meet all relevant environmental legislation.

This deliverable was completed as planned

In summary all documented project deliverables have been met by the KMCF project team. All stakeholders have submitted their feedback and acknowledge that there are no deliverables which were missed or omitted for this project.

4.0 PROJECT COSTS

The actual cost for the KMCF Keadue upgrade works Project was outlined below. This cost was broken out by project phase in the following chart.

Project Phase Actual Cost Comments

WWTP design € 15,000 Design costs came in under budget

Construction Cost € 353,685.04 Construction costs were on budget

Maintenance € 4,000 Maintenance costs were on budget

Page 6: Post Project Review

4

5.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE

The KMCF Keadue upgrade works project schedule called for a one year project with initiation beginning on March 1st, 2014 and project closeout ending on June 17th, 2011. The below chart shows each phase of the project lifecycle, the planned schedule dates, and the actual completion dates of each phase.

Project Phase Scheduled Start Schedule

Completion

Comments

Tendering 1/3/14 22/4/14 Completed on time

Procurement 30/4/14 9/5/14 Completed on time

Preliminaries 6/5/14 6/5/14 Completed on time

Construction 6/5/14 7/6/14 Completed on time

Testing 25/5/14 26/5/14 Completed on time

Completion 5/6/14 17/6/14 Progressing on time

The Keadue upgrade works Project successfully completed each phase on time which can be attributed to effective planning and communication as well as sponsor and executive level support of this important initiative. Throughout the project there was a strong sense of cooperation across the organization as the importance of this project was stressed and its benefits were realized.

Page 7: Post Project Review

5

Sponsor Acceptance

Approved by the Project Sponsor:

__________________________________________ Date: ___________________

<Project Sponsor>

<Project Sponsor Title>