Upload
cassandra-garrison
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Post Conference Update
64th Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
Sponsored for CME credit by Rush University Medical Center
Supported by an independent educational grant from Gilead Sciences Medical Affairs
Simply Speaking® Hepatitis Post Conference Update: 64th Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases isCopyrighted 2014 by Practice Point Communications, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved.
2
Content Development & Training FacultyContent Development & Training Faculty
Fred Poordad, MDProfessor of Medicine
University of Texas Health Science Center
San Antonio, Texas● Disclosures
- Grants/Research Support: AbbVie, Achillion, Anadys, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck & Co., Novartis, Vertex
- Consultant: None
- Speakers’ Bureau: Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Merck & Co., Salix, Vertex
- Stock Shareholder: None
- Other Financial or Material Support: None
3
Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives(CME/CNE and CPE)(CME/CNE and CPE)
We Are Eliminating Hard Copy Evaluations!
● Upon completion of this activity, the participant intends to incorporate the following objectives into their practice of medicine:
- Screen and test for hepatitis B and C virus (HBV, HCV) infection in my patients according to the recommendations from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
- Appropriately select antiviral HBV and HCV treatment strategies for my patients with HBV and HCV infection
- Manage safety and tolerability problems with antiviral HBV and HCV agents, including side effect, drug-drug interactions, and resistance
- Evaluate new agents being investigated for HBV and HCV therapy with patients in order to optimize information-based decision making about therapy
CME/CNECME/CNE● Upon completion of this activity, the
pharmacist should be able to:
- Review the screening and testing process for hepatitis B and C virus (HBV, HCV) infection in my patients according to the recommendations from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
- Discuss antiviral HBV and HCV treatment strategies in patients with HBV and HCV infection
- Review safety and tolerability problems with antiviral HBV and HCV agents, including side effect, drug-drug interactions, and resistance
- Evaluate new agents being investigated for HBV and HCV therapy with patients
CPECPE
4
Program Overview
● HCV and HBV: epidemiology and public health considerations
● Chronic HCV infection
- New and emerging HCV regimens
• Interferon-free regimens
• DAA + PR
- HCV/HIV coinfection and triple therapy
- Liver transplantation and triple therapy
● Chronic HBV infection
5
Global Burden of Disease Study 2010:Causes of Death From Chronic Liver Disease
Cowie BC, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):218A-219A. Abstract 23.
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
45%
Global 2010
26%
HBV
Liver Cancer
20%
30%28%
14%
27%
9%
HCV ETOH Other HBV
CirrhosisHCV ETOH Other
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
16%
USA 2010
40%
HBV
Liver Cancer
29%
9%
40%
14%
39%
14%
HCV ETOH Other HBV
CirrhosisHCV ETOH Other
Increase in liver-cancer deaths (past 20 years): Globally (from 1.25 to 1.75 million/year); USA (45,000 to 70,000/year).
6
Primary Care Setting: HCV Persons Unidentified by Risk-Based Screening
● Cross-sectional study (2005-2010)
- 4 large primary care health systems
- >18 years of age
- Median follow-up: 5 months
- Multiple imputation used to predict HCV results for patients not tested for HCV
● Newly enrolled patients (n=209,076)
- Tested for HCV: 8.4%
● Predicted HCV prevalence: 2.9%
● Total HCV cases: 6005 (identified + estimated)
- Proportion unidentified: 81%
Yartel AK, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):219A. Abstract 24.
Patients(n=209,076)
Tested for HCV (%) Number HCV positive
8.41115 (0.53%)
Predictors of HCV positivity (adjusted odds ratio) Born 1945-1965 Male gender Black Hispanic Elevated ALT IDU
4.4*1.4*1.9*1.5*4.8*6.3*
Not tested for HCV (%) Number estimated HCV positive
91.94890 (2.3%)
Results
*P<0.001.
7
Diagnosis Accuracy of Liver Stiffness in Chronic Viral Hepatitis
● Large US cohort (n=907; HCV 93%, HBV 7%)
- Phase 1 (n=188/237 evaluable biopsy/FSCAN)
- Phase 2 (n=560/670 evaluable biopsy/FSCAN)
- FSCAN/biopsy failure: 10.4%/7.9%
● Liver stiffness has high accuracy for staging >F2 fibrosis
● AUC 0.91
- Elastography excellent for exclusion of cirrhosis
● Higher BMI can affect cutoffs
- XL over M probe preferred
Afdhal NH, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):278A-279A. Abstract 141.
Sensitivity (95% CI)
Specificity (95% CI)
>F2 Phase 1 Phase 2*
81.9 (72.0-89.5)
57.9 (52.7-63.0)
79.0 (70.0-86.4)
74.9 (68.0-80.9)
>F3 Phase 1 Phase 2
88.3 (77.4-95.2)
71.8 (64.2-77.6)
81.9 (73.4-87.6)
80.1 (76.0-84.3)
F4 Phase 1 Phase 2
84.2 (68.7-94.0)
75.9 (64.0-83.6
86.0 (79.4-91.1)
85.1 (82.1-88.6)
Diagnostic Accuracy Versus Biopsy(HCV and HBV)
*P=0.043 versus phase 1.
FSCAN: FibroScan.
8
NHANES (1999-2010):HCV and Diabetes Risk
● NHANES (n=15,128)
- HCV negative (n=14,484)
- Anti-HCV positive (n=277)
- HCV RNA positive (n=188)
- ADA criteria for diabetes, pre-diabetes, and normal glucose
● Summary of findings
- HCV was not associated with diabetes and pre-diabetes
- Elevated liver enzymes were associated with diabetes regardless of HCV status
- HOMA-IR did not differ by HCV status among those with normal glucose
Ruhl CE, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):1308A-1309A. Abstract 2275.
Pre
vale
nce
(%
)10.5%
Prevalence of Diabetesand Pre-Diabetes
HCV-
Diabetes
P=NS
Anti-HCV+
HCVRNA+
Pre-Diabetes
HCV- Anti-HCV+
HCVRNA+
10.2%12.0%
32.7%
P=NS
36.4%
39.6%
9
Program Overview
● HCV and HBV: epidemiology and public health considerations
● Chronic HCV infection
- New and emerging HCV regimens
• Interferon-free regimens
• DAA + PR
- HCV/HIV coinfection and triple therapy
- Liver transplantation and triple therapy
- Clinical considerations with boceprevir- and telaprevir-based regimens
● Chronic HBV infection
10
ELECTRON Study: Once-Daily, Fixed-Dose Combination Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir + RBV
Gane EJ, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):243A. Abstract 73.
Sofosbuvir 400 mg (nucleotide NS5B polymerase inhibitor); ledipasvir 90 mg (NS5A inhibitor).Weight-based ribavirin dosing (1000-1200 mg).Baseline characteristics: Male: 52% to 100%; age: 5161 years; white: 80% to 100%. Genotype 1a: 60% to 85%; IL28B non-CC: 60% to 85%. HCV RNA: 6.1 to 6.5 log10 IU/mL.
Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir qd(n=10)
Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir qd+ RBV (n=9)
Follow-Up
Phase 2bOpen-labelGenotype 1 Follow-Up
Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir qd + RBV (n=25)
Follow-Up
Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir qd+ RBV (n=25)
Follow-Up
Week 0 6 12 24
Treatment-experienced
Cirrhotic (F4)
Treatment-naiveNon-cirrhotic
(F0-F2)
Cirrhotic(F3/F4)
Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir qd+ GS-9669 (n=26)
Follow-Up
11
ELECTRON Study:SVR12 Rates
Gane EJ, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):243A. Abstract 73.*Lawitz E, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):315A-316A. Abstract 215.
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir
--(n=10)
70%
100%
Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir
RBV(n=9)
Treatment-Experienced Treatment-Naive100% 100%
Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir
RBV(n=25)
Sofosbuvir/LedipasvirGS-9669
(n=26)
F4 F3/4
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
12 Weeks(n=25)
68%
100%
8 Weeks*(n=21)
100%
6 Weeks(n=25)
Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir + RBV(No Cirrhosis)
12
LONESTAR Study: Once-Daily, Fixed-Dose Combination Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir + RBV
Lawitz E, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):315A-316A. Abstract 215.
Sofosbuvir 400 mg (nucleotide NS5B polymerase inhibitor); ledipasvir 90 mg (NS5A inhibitor).Weight-based ribavirin dosing (1000-1200 mg).No upper limit to age, BMI, or platelet count. Primary endpoint SVR12.PI-experienced: all had prior virologic failure with either boceprevir (55%) or telaprevir (45%) based triple therapy.Baseline characteristics: age (50 years), male (66%), BMI (29.9 kg/m2), IL28B non-CC (85%), genotype 1a (87%), HCV RNA 6.1 log10 IU/mL.
Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir qd (n=20)
Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir qd + RBV (n=21)
Phase 2Open-labelGenotype 1 Follow-Up
Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir qd (n=19)Follow-Up
Week 0 4 8 12 20 24
Follow-Up
Follow-UpSofosbuvir/Ledipasvir qd (n=19)
Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir qd+ RBV (n=21)
Follow-Up
Treatment-naïveNon-cirrhotic
PI-experienced50% cirrhotic
13
LONESTAR Study:SVR12 Results
Lawitz E, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):315A-316A. Abstract 215.
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir
--(n=20)
95%100%
Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir
RBV(n=21)
Treatment-Naïve(No Cirrhosis)
PI-Experienced(50% Cirrhotic)
95%
Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir
--(n=19)
8 Weeks 12 Weeks
Pat
ien
ts
(%)
95%
Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir
--(n=19)
Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir
RBV(n=21)
12 Weeks
100%
14
LONESTAR Study:Resistance and Safety Results
● SVR12 and baseline RAVs
- NS5A (n=9): 78%
- NS3/4a (n=28): 100%
● S282T and multiple NS5A RAVs detected at relapse in 1 patient (sofosbuvir/ledipasvir 8 weeks)
- SVR12 achieved after retreatment with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir + RBV for 24 weeks
Lawitz E, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):315A-316A. Abstract 215.Lawitz E, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):1092A. Abstract 1844.
No RBV(n=58)
With RBV(n=420)
Adverse events leading to discontinuation (%)
0 0
Grade 3/4 (%) Adverse events Laboratory abnormality
07
1414
Adverse events (%) Nausea Anemia URT infection Headache
5075
14191010
Anemia (%) Hemoglobin <10 g/dL Hemoglobin <8.5 g/dL
00
195
Safety(Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir)
PR: pegIFN + RBV.URT: upper respiratory tract.
15
COSMOS Study: Simeprevir + Sofosbuvir + RBV
Jacobson IM, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):73A. Abstract LB-3.
Simeprevir + Sofosbuvir qd (n=14)
Simeprevir + Sofosbuvir qd+ RBV (n=27)
Phase 2aOpen-labelGenotype 1Prior PR null responder
Week 0 12 24
Simeprevir + Sofosbuvir qd (n=15)
Simeprevir + Sofosbuvir qd + RBV (n=24)
Simeprevir + Sofosbuvir qd (n=14)
Simeprevir + Sofosbuvir qd+ RBV (n=27)
Simeprevir + Sofosbuvir qd (n=16)
Simeprevir + Sofosbuvir qd + RBV (n=30)
Sofosbuvir 400 mg (nucleotide NS5B polymerase inhibitor); simeprevir 150 mg (NS3/4A Inhibitor).Weight-based ribavirin dosing (1000-1200 mg).
Non-cirrhoticNon-cirrhotic(F0-F2)(F0-F2)
CirrhoticCirrhotic(F3-F4)(F3-F4)
16
COSMOS Study: Interim Results With Simeprevir + Sofosbuvir + RBV
Jacobson IM, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):73A. Abstract LB-3.
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
SVR12: No Cirrhosis (F0-F2)(Prior PR Null Responders)
92.9%
24 Weeks(n=24/15)
12 Weeks(n=27/14)
Simeprevir + sofosbuvir No RBV With RBV
96.3% 93.3%
79.2%
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
SVR4: Cirrhosis (F3-F4)*(Naives and Prior PR Null Responders)
100%
Naives(n=7/12)
Overall(n=14/14)
96.3%100%
93.3%
*Interim analysis: SVR4 rates in patients receiving the 12-week regimens.
Nulls(n=7/15)
100%
Simeprevir + sofosbuvir No RBV With RBV
17
COSMOS Study: Interim Safety Results With Simeprevir + Sofosbuvir + RBV
Jacobson IM, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):73A. Abstract LB-3.
SimeprevirSofosbuvir
RBV(n=54)
SimeprevirSofosbuvir
--(n=31)
Simeprevir Sofosbuvir
RBV(n=54)
SimeprevirSofosbuvir
--(n=28)
Discontinuations due to adverse events (%)
3.7 6.5 0 0
Grade 3/4 events (%) Adverse events Hyperbilirubinemia
7.49.4
12.93.2
11.15.6
3.63.6
Common adverse events (%) Fatigue Headache Nausea Insomnia Rash Pruritus Anemia
37201117131720
3223137
1033
2417159
159
11
252121144
110
24 Weeks 12 Weeks
18
VALENCE Trial: Sofosbuvir + RBV in Treatment-Naïve, HCV Genotype 2 or 3
Zeuzem S, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):733A-734A. Abstract 1085.
Sofosbuvir qd + RBV(n=73/11)
Sofosbuvir qd + RBV (n=250)
Phase 3 (Europe)Open-labelGenotype 1HCV treatment- naïve and experiencedCirrhosis allowed
Week 0 12 24
GenotypeGenotype2 or 32 or 3
Genotype 3Genotype 3(amended(amendedprotocol)protocol)
Sofosbuvir 400 mg (nucleotide NS5B polymerase inhibitor) + weight-based ribavirin dosing (1000-1200 mg).Primary endpoint: SVR12.Baseline demographics and disease characteristics: Male: 55% to 62%. IL28B non-CC: 64% to 74%. HCV RNA (log10 IU/mL): 6.2-6.5. Cirrhosis: 14% to 23%. Prior pegIFN + RBV nonresponder: 24% to 44% Prior pegIFN + RBV relapser: 56% to 68%.
19
VALENCE Trial:SVR12 Rates in HCV Genotype 2 or 3
Zeuzem S, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):733A-734A. Abstract 1085.
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
93%100%
85%91%
97%
Overall(n=73/250)
94% 92%87%
Genotype 2Genotype 3
Noncirrhotic(n=30/92)
60%
88%
Treatment-Naive
Cirrhotic(n=2/13)
Noncirrhotic(n=33/100)
Cirrhotic(n=8/45)
Treatment-Experienced
No resistance detected in patients with relapse.
20
Sofosbuvir + RBV + PegIFN:SVR12 by Fibrosis Stage
● Retrospective analysis of 4 phase 3 clinical trials
- Sofosbuvir + RBV (12 weeks) in HCV genotype 2/3
• FISSION (treatment-naïve)
• FUSION (treatment-experienced)
• POSITRON (IFN incapable)
- Sofosbuvir + RBV (16 weeks) in HCV genotype 2/3
• FUSION (treatment-experienced)
- Sofosbuvir + pegIFN + RBV (12 weeks) in HCV genotype 1/4/5/6
• NEUTRINO (treatment-naïve)
● Baseline fibrosis stage by FibroTest/FibroSure
- F0-F2 (55%), F3 (17%), F4 (28%)
● SVR12 rates among patients with thrombocytopenia (platelets <125/mm3) were similar to rates in cirrhotic patients across all HCV genotypes
Patel K, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):738A-739A. Abstract 1093.
21
Sofosbuvir + RBV (12 Weeks): SVR12 by Baseline Fibrosis Stage (FibroTest)
Patel K, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):738A-739A. Abstract 1093.
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
100%
88%
Genotype 2 Genotype 3
86%
F1-F2(n=12/39/13)
F4(n=13/25/9)
F3(n=6/13/7)
F0(n=13/32/7)
FISSION (treatment-naïve) POSITRON (IFN incapable)
FUSION (treatment-experienced)
92%97%
100% 100%
92%
86%
100%
92%
67%
Pat
ien
ts (
%) 67%
75%
0%
F1-F2(n=38/37/14)
F4(n=21/26/29)
F3(n=16/12/18)
F0(n=27/24/3)
FISSION (treatment-naïve) POSITRON (IFN incapable)
FUSION (treatment-experienced)
53%
62%
50%
38%
58%
22%
48%
28%
48%
22
Sofosbuvir + RBV + PegIFN: SVR12 by Baseline Fibrosis Stage (FibroTest)
Patel K, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):738A-739A. Abstract 1093.
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
100%
Sofosbuvir + RBV (FUSION)(16 weeks, treatment-experienced)
80%
F1-F2(n=14/21)
F4(n=9/27)
F3(n=5/10)
F0(n=4/5)
Genotype 2 Genotype 3
67%
100%
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
96%97%
F1-F2(n=105)
F4(n=86)
F3(n=54)
F0(n=78)
85%79%
Sofosbuvir + PR (NEUTRINO)(12 weeks, treatment-naïve)
Genotypes 1, 4-6
80%
40%
63%
89%
PR: pegIFN + RBV.
23
Sofosbuvir + RBV in US Patients of Egyptian Ancestry (Genotype 4)
Ruane PJ, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):736A. Abstract 1090.
Phase 2 (open-label)Open-labelGenotype 4
Treatment-experienced
Sofosbuvir 400 mg (nucleotide NS5B polymerase inhibitor).Weight-based ribavirin dosing (1000-1200 mg).Egyptian born with documented maternal and parenteral Egyptian ancestry.Baseline characteristics: Male (68%), cirrhosis (23%), HCV RNA (5.7 to 6.1 log10 IU/mL), IL28B non-CC (83%).
Week 0 12 24
Sofosbuvir qd + RBV (n=14)
Sofosbuvir qd + RBV (n=14)
Sofosbuvir qd + RBV (n=17)
Sofosbuvir qd + RBV (n=15)
Treatment-naive
24
Sofosbuvir + RBV: SVR Rates in an US Patients of Egyptian Ancestry (Genotype 4)
Ruane PJ, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):736A. Abstract 1090.
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
Treatment-Naive100%
79%
N/A
12 Weeks(n=14/14)
24 Weeks(n=14)
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
Treatment-Experienced
59%
93%
N/A
12 Weeks(n=17/17)
24 Weeks(n=15)
SVR4SVR12
SVR4SVR12
N/A: data not available.
79%
59%
25
AVIATOR Study: Concordance of SVR4 and SVR12 With SVR24 in HCV Genotype 1
● Pooled analysis (treatment-naïve and prior null responders) of ABT-450/r + ABT-267 + ABT-333 + RBV for 12 or 24 weeks (n=247)
- SVR4 and 12: 96.4% and 95.5%
- SVR24: 93.9%
● Patients achieving SVR4
- No relapses in post-treatment week 12 or 24
● 84% concordance between SVR12 and SVR24
● Results support the use of SVR12 as a primary efficacy endpoint for this IFN-free regimen in HCV genotype 1
Poordad F, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):735A-736A. Abstract 1089.
SVR4 SVR12
Predictive value (%) Positive Negative
97.5100
98.3100
Sensitivity (%) 100 100
Specificity (%) 60.0 73.3
Cohen’s Kappa 0.74 0.84
Concordance With SVR24
26
PEARL-1 Study: ABT-450/r + ABT-267in HCV Genotype 1b
● Open-label phase 2 study
- HCV genotype 1b treatment-naïve and prior PR null responders
- Non-cirrhotic
● ABT-450/r (150/100 mg qd) + ABT-267 (25 mg qd)
● No discontinuations due to adverse events or laboratory abnormalities
- Grade 3 elevations: ALT (n=1); AST (n=2)
● Most common adverse events
- Headache, nausea, dry skin, fatigue, pruritus, diarrhea
Lawitz E, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):244A. Abstract 75.
ABT-450 (NS3/4A protease inhibitor); ABT-267 (NS5A replication complex inhibitor).PR: pegIFN + RBV.
Treatment-
Naïve(n=42)
Prior Null PRResponders
(n=40)
Baseline Male (%) White (%) Age (years) HCV RNA (log10 IU/mL) IL28B non-CC (%)
59.566.755.86.4
68.3
37.597.553.46.4
95.0
Efficacy (%) HCV RNA <25 IU/mL Week 4 Week 12 SVR4 SVR12
10097.697.695.2
97.597.592.590.0
Outcomes
27
C-SPIRIT Study: Interim Analysis of MK-5172 + RBV in Treatment-Naïve, HCV Genotype 1
● Open-label, proof of concept study
- Treatment-naïve
- IL28B CC genotype
- Non-cirrhotic
● Randomized arms
- MK-5172 100 mg qd + RBV for 12 or 24 weeks
• 12-week arm extended to 24 weeks if HCV RNA detectable at week 4
● Primary endpoint: SVR12
Gane EJ, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):748A-749A. Abstract 1110.
MK-5172 (NS3/4A protease inhibitor).
Patients(n=23)
SVR4 (%) Overall Genotype 1a (n=11) 1b (n=12) 12-week arm (n=8) Extended arm (n=4) 24-week arm (n=11)
83
7392887582
Common adverse events (%) Headache Asthenia Insomnia Dyspepsia Anemia Nausea
232312121212
Outcomes
28
C-WORTHY Study: MK-5172/MK-8742 + RBV in Treatment-Naïve, HCV Genotype 1
● Open-label, phase 2b study
- Treatment-naïve, genotype 1
- Non-cirrhotic (F0-F2)
- No HBV or HIV
● Randomized arms (12 weeks)
- MK-5172/MK-8742 (100/20 or 100/50 mg qd) + RBV
• Stratified by genotype 1a and 1b
- MK-5172/MK-8742 (100/50 mg qd) (genotype 1b only)
● Primary outcome: SVR12
Lawitz E, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):244A-245A. Abstract 76.
MK-5172 (NS3/4A protease inhibitor); MK-8742 (NS5A replication complex inhibitor).Weight-based ribavirin dosing (600-1400 mg).
100/20(n=25)
100/50(n=27)
100/50(n=13)
Genotype (%) 1a 1b
7624
7030
0100
Age (years) 48.7 43.9 43.3
Race (%) White 96 89 69
IL28B non-CC (%) 76 78 85
HCV RNA <800K IU/mL (%)
68 63 54
Baseline CharacteristicsMK-5172 + MK-8742
Dose Arms (mg)
29
C-WORTHY Treatment Results: MK-5172/MK-8742 + RBV in Treatment-Naïve, HCV Genotype 1
● Virologic failure (n=1)
- RAVs at baseline and at relapse
• NS5A: Y93N
• NS3: Y56H, D168A/D
● No discontinuations due to adverse events
- No grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities
● Most common adverse events
- Fatigue (26%), headache (22%), nausea (18%), diarrhea (12%), dizziness (11%), rash (11%)
Lawitz E, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):244A-245A. Abstract 76.
MK-5172 (NS3/4A protease inhibitor).MK-8742 (NS5A replication complex inhibitor).Weight-based ribavirin dosing (600-1400 mg).
SVR Rates
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
100/20 mg(n=25)
96%
100/50 mg(n=27)
100%
100/50 mg*(n=13)
With RBV
89%
SVR4 SVR12
*Genotype 1b only.
Without RBV
30
Study 014: Daclatasvir + Asunaprevir + BMS-791325 in HCV Genotype 1
Everson GT, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):73A. Abstract LB-1.
Phase 2bOpen-labelGenotype 1Treatment-naïveStratified by: 1a and 1b Cirrhosis
Daclatasvie (NS5A inhibitor; asunaprevir (NS3 inhibitor); BMS-791325 (non-nucleoside NS5B inhibitor).Primary endpoint: SVR12.Baseline characteristics: Age: 54 years; male: 67%. Genotype 1a: 82%. HCV RNA 6.4 log10 IU/mL. Cirrhosis (biopsy confirmed): 9%. IL28B non-CC: 67%.
Week 0 12 24
Daclatasvir 30 mg + Asunaprevir 200 mg +
BMS-791325 75 mg bid (n=80)
Daclatasvir 30 mg + Asunaprevir 200 mg +
BMS-791325 150 mg bid (n=86)
Follow-Up
Follow-Up
31
Study 014:SVR 12 Rates in HCV Genotype 1
Everson GT, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):73A. Abstract LB-1.
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
92% 91%
100%
Overall(n=77/84)
94%89%
96%91%
100%
71%
Daclatasvir + Asunaprevir + BMS-791325 75 mg bidDaclatasvir + Asunaprevir + BMS-791325 150 mg bid
91%94%
1a(n=65/68)
1b(n=12/16)
CC(n=24/28)
Non-CC(n=53/56)
Genotype IL28B
Cirrhosis(n=8/7)
NoCirrhosis(n=69/77)
All patients received daclatasvir 30 mg + asunaprevir 200 mg, both bid.
32
Study 014:Virologic Failures and Safety
● Virologic failures (n=11; 6.6%)
- All were HCV genotype 1a
- Signature RAVs detected at virologic failure
• NS3: V36M, T54S, R155K
• NS5B: M28T, Q30E/H/R
• NS5B: P495L/S
● Well tolerated regimen
- Discontinuations due to adverse events (1.1%)
- Most frequent adverse events: headache (25%), diarrhea (15%), fatigue (11%), nausea (10%)
- Grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities (<1.2%)
Everson GT, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):73A. Abstract LB-1.
33
SOUND-C3: Faldaprevir + Deleobuvir+ RBV in HCV Genotype 1
● Open-label phase 2 study
- Treatment-naïve
- Stratified by HCV genotype 1a and 1b
- Compensated cirrhosis included
● Faldaprevir 120 mg qd + deleobuvir 600 mg bid + RBV for 16 weeks
- Primary endpoint: SVR12
● Phase 3 studies underway
- 16- and 24-week regimens in HCV genotype 1b
Dufour J, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):744A. Abstract 1102.
Faldaprevir (NS3/4A inhibitor), deleobuvir (formerly BI 207127) (non-nucleoside NS5B inhibitor).
Patients(n=32)
SVR12 (%) Genotype 1a (n=12) 1b (n=20) Cirrhosis (n=4)
1795
100
Discontinuation due to adverse events (%)
9
Common adverse events (%) Anemia Fatigue Vomiting Nausea
16999
Bilirubin (total) >2.6 x ULN (%) 44
Outcomes
34
Program Overview
● HCV and HBV: epidemiology and public health considerations
● Chronic HCV infection
- New and emerging HCV regimens
• Interferon-free regimens
• DAA + PR
- HCV/HIV coinfection and triple therapy
- Liver transplantation and triple therapy
● Chronic HBV infection
35
QUEST-1 and -2: Simeprevir + PR inDifficult-to-Cure, HCV Genotype 1 Subgroups
Jacobson IM, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):756A-757A. Abstract 1122.
Simeprevir (NS3/4A protease inhibitor).HCV RNA >10,000 IU/mL.PR: pegIFN (alpha 2a or 2b) + RBV (weight-based dosing: 1000-1200 mg).Response-guided therapy criteria: HCV RNA <25 IU/mL at week 4 and undetectable at week 12.Primary efficacy endpoint: SVR12.
Simeprevir150 mg qd + PR (n=521)
PR
PR
Week 0 12 24 48 72
PR
Follow-Up
Follow-Up
Response-Guided Therapy
PR(n=264)
PRFollow-Up
Phase 3Double-blindTreatment-naiveSubgroups HCV genotype 1a IL28BB TT Cirrhotic (F4) Baseline Q80K mutation
36
QUEST-1 and -2: SVR12 Rates inDifficult-to-Cure, HCV Genotype 1 Subgroups
Jacobson IM, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):756A-757A. Abstract 1122.
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
47%
80%*75%
58%
50%
Overall(n=521/264)
52%
80%85%
95%
78%
53%
42%
Simeprevir + RBVPR
61%
21%
1a(n=254/131)
1a + Q80K(n=84/44)
CC(n=152/79)
CT(n=292/147)
Genotype IL28B
F3(n=82/40)
F4(n=48/32)
METAVIR Score
60%
34%
73%
38%
*P<0.001.
1b(n=267/133)
TT(n=77/38)
PR: pegIFN + RBV.
37
PROMISE Trial: Simeprevir + PR inDifficult-to-Cure, HCV Genotype 1 Subgroups
Forns X, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):737A-738A. Abstract 1092.
Simeprevir150 mg qd + PR (n=260)
Phase 3Double-blindPrior PR relapsersSubgroups HCV genotype 1a IL28BB TT Cirrhotic (F4) Baseline Q80K mutation
PR
PR
Week 0 12 24 48 72
Simeprevir (NS3/4A) protease inhibitor).PR: peginterferon + RBV.Response-guided therapy criteria: HCV RNA <25 IU/mL at week 4 and undetectable at week 12.Primary endpoint: SVR12.Baseline characteristics: Male (59% to 69%), white (94% to 96%), IL28B non-CC (74% to 76%). HCV RNA (6.5 log10 IU/mL); genotype 1a/1b (41% to 43%/57% to 59%).
PR
Follow-Up
Follow-Up
Response-Guided Therapy
PR(n=133)
PRFollow-Up
38
PROMISE Trial: SVR12 Rates inDifficult-to-Cure, HCV Genotype 1 Subgroups
Forns X, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):737A-738A. Abstract 1092.
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
27%
79%
70%
47%
37%
Overall(n=260/133)
30%
53%
86% 88%*
78%*
43%
34%
Simeprevir + RBVPR
65%*
19%
1a(n=111/54)
1a + Q80K(n=30/20)
CC(n=62/34)
CT(n=187/83)
Genotype IL28B
F3(n=44/15)
F4(n=29/19)
METAVIR Score
74%*
26%
73%*
20%
*P<0.001.
1b(n=149/79)
TT(n=31/16)
PR: pegIFN + RBV.
39
PROMISE Trial:Safety
● Simeprevir + PR was generally well tolerated
- Majority of adverse events were grade 1 or 2
- Discontinuations due to adverse events (0.4%)
● Most common adverse events
- Fatigue (31.9%), headache (31.9%), influenza-like illness (29.6%)
- Of interest: rash (<20%) and anemia (15%)
- Incidence of ribavirin dose reduction (20% in both arms)
Forns X, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):737A-738A. Abstract 1092.
PR: pegIFN + RBV.
40
STARTVerso3: Faldaprevir + PR in Treatment-Experienced, HCV Genotype 1
Jacobson IM, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):742A-743A. Abstract 1100.
Week 0 12 24 48 72
ETS, Follow-UpFaldaprevir 240 mg
qd + PR (n=99)
Faldaprevir 240 mg qd + PR (n=102)
PR (n=49)
Faldaprevir (NS3/4A protease inhibitor).No HBV or HIV coinfection. Fibrosis stage >F3: 53%.ETS: early treatment success (HCV RNA <25 IU/mL at week 4 and undetectable at week 8).Primary efficacy endpoint: SVR12.
Phase 3Double-blindGenotype 1
PR Follow-Up
PRPRPrior PR relapser Follow-Up
Follow-Up
Prior PR partial responders
Faldaprevir 240 mg qd + PR (n=57)
Faldaprevir 240 mg qd + PR (n=55)
PR (n=29)
PR Follow-Up
PR
Follow-Up
Follow-Up
Prior PR null responders
Faldaprevir 240 mg qd + PR (n=146)
Faldaprevir 240 mg qd + PR (n=141) PR Follow-Up
PR Follow-Up
41
STARTVerso3: SVR12 Rates With Faldaprevir + PR in HCV Genotype 1
Jacobson IM, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):742A-743A. Abstract 1100.
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
Prior Relapsers
70%*
14%
1a(n=46/46/24)
Overall(n=99/102/14)
1b(n=77/75/16)
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
Prior PartialResponders Null Responders
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
HCV Genotype
1a(n=25/26/14)
Overall(n=57/55/29)
1b(n=32/29/15)
HCV Genotype
1a(n=66/69)
Overall(n=145/141)
1b(n=78/72)
HCV Genotype
*P<0.0001 versus PR (pegIFN + RBV).
61%63%
13%
77%75%
16%
58%*
3%
52%
58%
0%
63%
38%
7%
47%*
33%
26%22%
39%43%
Faldaprevir 240 mg qd + PR 12 weeks 24 weeksPR
Faldaprevir 240 mg qd + PR 12 weeks 24 weeksPR
Faldaprevir 240 mg qd + PR 12 weeks 24 weeks
42
STARTVerso3:Resistance and Safety
● Most common emergent RAVs
- Genotype 1a: R155K
- Genotype 1b: D168
● No significant effect of baseline Q80K and other common NS3 polymorphisms on SVR12 in genotype 1a or 1b patients
● Faldaprevir + PR was well tolerated
- Discontinuations due to adverse events: 5.5%
● Adverse event profile of faldaprevir + PR was similar to the PR arm
● Most common adverse events of at least moderate severity
● Gastrointestinal (18%), anemia (10%)
● Total bilirubin elevations >2.6 x ULN with faldaprevir + PR were benign and transient (49%)
Jacobson IM, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):742A-743A. Abstract 1100.
43
LONESTAR-2 Study: Sofosbuvir + PR in Treatment-Experienced, HCV Genotype 2 or 3
● Open-label, phase 2 study
- Failed prior PR therapy
- No HBV or HIV
● Sofosbuvir 400 mg qd + PR for 12 weeks
● Baseline
- Male: 68%; BMI: 31 kg/m2
- IL28B CC: 36%
- HCV RNA: 6.2 log10 IU/mL
- Compensated cirrhosis (55%)
- PR relapse/breakthrough: 85%
● Overall SVR12 rate: 89%
- Similar SVR12 rates in patients with and without cirrhosis
Lawitz E, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):73A. Abstract LB-4.
PR: pegIFN + RBV.
SVR12 Rates
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
93%96%
Genotype 3(n=24/12/12)
Genotype 2 (n=23/9/14)
Overall
No cirrhosis
Cirrhosis100%
83% 83% 83%
44
LONESTAR-2 Study:Safety Summary
● Sofosbuvir + PR was generally safe and well tolerated
● Safety profile consistent with PR therapy
● Low rate of discontinuations due to adverse events
Lawitz E, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):73A. Abstract LB-4.
PR: pegIFN + RBV.
Patients(n=47)
Discontinuation due to adverse events (%)
2
Grade 3/4 Adverse events Laboratory abnormalities
3260
Hemoglobin (%) <10 g/dL <8.5 g/dL
289
Absolute neutrophil count <750/mm3 (%)
28
Common adverse events (%) Flu-like symptoms Fatigue Neutropenia Nausea
55322317
Safety Summary
45
Program Overview
● HCV and HBV: epidemiology and public health considerations
● Chronic HCV infection
- New and emerging HCV regimens
• Interferon-free regimens
• DAA + PR
- HCV/HIV coinfection and triple therapy
- Liver transplantation and triple therapy
● Chronic HBV infection
46
PHOTON-1 Study: Sofosbuvir + RBVin HCV/HIV Coinfection
Sulkowski MS, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):313A-314. Abstract 212.
Phase 3Open-labelTreatment-naïve HCV genotype 1-3Compensated cirrhosis allowedStable HIV disease
Week 0 12 24 36
Sofosbuvir + RBV(n=114)
Sofosbuvir + RBV
(n=68)
Follow-UpGenotype 1
Follow-Up
Sofosbuvir 400 mg (nucleotide NS5B polymerase inhibitor).Weight-based ribavirin dosing (1000-1200 mg).Primary endpoint SVR12.ART was FTC/TDF plus either efavirenz (34%), atazanavir/r (17%), darunavir/r (18%), raltegravir (16%), rilpivirine (6%).Baseline characteristics: Male: 82%. BMI: 27 kg/m2. IL28 non-CC: 30%. Cirrhosis: 7%. CD4: 559-636 cells/µL.
Genotype 2,3
47
PHOTON-1 Study:Treatment Outcomes
● SVR12 rates in genotype 1
- Similar regardless of baseline HCV RNA, IL28b genotype, presence of cirrhosis, age, gender, race
- Lower in genotype 1b versus 1a
● No resistance (deep sequencing) detected in virologic failures
● HIV breakthroughs (n=2)
● Discontinuations due to adverse events: 3%
● Most common adverse events
- Fatigue, insomnia, headache, nausea
- Grade >3 hyperbilirubinemia in patients receiving atazanavir versus no atazanavir (13% versus 1%)
Sulkowski MS, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):313A-314. Abstract 212.
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
SVR12 Rates
76%
88%
Genotype 1 (n=114)
Genotype 2(n=26)
Genotype 3(n=42)
67%
24 WeeksTherapy*
12 WeeksTherapy*
*Sofosbuvir 400 mg qd + RBV.
48
Program Overview
● HCV and HBV: epidemiology and public health considerations
● Chronic HCV infection
- New and emerging HCV regimens
• Interferon-free regimens
• DAA + PR
- HCV/HIV coinfection and triple therapy
- Liver transplantation and triple therapy
● Chronic HBV infection
49
REFRESH Study: Telaprevir + PR in HCV Genotype 1 Liver Transplant Recipients
Brown K, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):209A. Abstract 3.
Phase 2bOpen-labelHCV genotype 1 (1b: 22%) HCV RNA >10K IU/mLOn stable tacrolimus (n=39) or cyclosporine (*n=7)HCV treatment-naïve (22%), relapser (20%), partial (11%) and null responder (33%) before (46%) or after (22%) liver transplantation
Excluded: Retransplantation for recurrent HCV Hemoglobin <11 g/dL
Week 0 4 12 24 36 48 60
Telaprevir +PR (n=46)
Telaprevir (1125 mg tid) + pegIFN (180 µg/week) + RBV (600 mg initial dose).Futility rules (all drugs discontinued): HCV RNA >1000 IU/mL at week 4, 8, or 12. Virologic breakthrough at any time; or HCV RNA <25 IU/mL detected at weeks 24 and 36.Primary endpoint: SVR12.Initial cyclosporine and tacrolimus doses reduced ~4 and ~10 fold, respectively, at baseline. Subsequent doses adjusted based on plasma levels.
Study part A: >12 patients who reach week 4 and undergo safety review before enrolling rest of patients.Study part B: remainder of patients enrolled following acceptable safety review of part A patients.
PRFollow-Up
Interim Analysis: Efficacy (weeks 4 and 12) Safety (week 16)
50
REFRESH Study: Telaprevir + PR in HCV Genotype 1 Liver Transplant Recipients
● Interim results with telaprevir + PR show promising efficacy
● Anemia
- Mild or moderate: 41%
- Severe: 6.5%
- RBV dose reduction: 43%
- Erythropoietin/blood transfusions: 30%/6.5%
● No reports of
- Rejections, autoimmune hepatitis, or deaths
- Severe or potentially life-threatening cases of rash or pruritus
Brown K, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):209A. Abstract 3.
Patients(n=46)
HCV RNA <25 IU/mL (%) Week 4 Week 12
5360
Serious adverse events (%) 15
Adverse events (%) Fatigue Anemia Headache Nausea Anorectal Diarrhea Rash Pruritus
5948464141373522
Grade 3/4 creatinine increase (%) 4
Renal failure 11
Interim Results
PR: pegIFN + RBV.
51
CRUSH-C: Triple Therapy inHCV-Infected Transplant Recipients
• Multicenter, retrospective, cohort study of consecutive HCV-infected, genotype 1 liver transplant recipients (n=112)
– 6 US transplantation centers
• Protease inhibitor + PR
– Telaprevir: 90%
– Boceprevir: 10%
• Median time from liver transplant to triple therapy: 3.4 years
• Median days of LI and total treatment
– LI <90 arm (n=107): 30 and 282 days
– LI >90 arm (n=18): 182 and 370 days
Patients(n=125)
Male (%) 75
Age (years) 58
Race (%) White 61
Genotype 1a (%) 58
IL28B CC (%) 24
Advanced fibrosis F3-F4 (%) 48
Primary immunosuppressant (%) Cyclosporine/tacrolimus/other 58/29/13
Mycophenolate use (%) 79
Corticosteroid use (%) 26
Baseline Characteristics
LI: lead-in period with only PR therapy.
Stravitz R, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):429A. Abstract 461.
PR: pegIFN + RBV.
52
CRUSH-C:Virologic Response
● eRVR is highly predictive of SVR12
● Treatment duration <36 weeks negatively affects SVR12 rates
● Adverse events led to treatment
- Discontinuations: 20%
- Interruption: 7%
SVR12
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
Yes(n=56)
Overall(n=90)
No(n=32)
<36(n=5/10)
>36(n=46/11)
AchievedeRVR
Treatment Duration (weeks)
16%
59%
50%
93%†
*P<0.001 versus not achieving an eRVR.†P=0.04 versus <36 weeks (eRVR).‡P=0.003 versus <36 weeks (no eRVR).
Stravitz R, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):429A. Abstract 461.
86%
eRVRNo eRVR
5%
93%‡
53
CRUSH-C:Safety (All Patients)
• High rates of hospitalizations (27%) and >0.5 mg/dL increase in creatinine (41%)
• Anemia is a significant problem
– PegIFN/RBV dose reduction: 38%/86%
– Erythropoietin/blood transfusions: 84%/56
• Death (7%)
– Mainly due to liver-related causes, usually in patients with advanced disease
Stravitz R, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):429A. Abstract 461.
54
Sofosbuvir + RBV: Treatment ofRecurrent HCV After Liver Transplantation
● Open-label, pilot study
- Genotype 1(83%), 3 (15%), 4 (3%)
- Prior HCV treatment (88%)
- CPT <7 and MELD <17
- Time liver transplantation: 4.3 years
- METAVIR F3/F4: 23%/40%
● Sofosbuvir 400 mg qd + RBV (starting at 400 mg) for up to 24 weeks
● Primary efficacy endpoint: SVR12
● Safety
- No deaths, graft losses, or rejection
- Discontinuations due adverse events: 5%
- RBV dose escalation manageable
- No interactions with common immunosuppressant agents
Charlton MR, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):73A. Abstract LB-2.
Patients
(%)
HCV RNA <25 IU/mL Week 4 (n=40) End of treatment (n=39) SVR4 (n=35)
10010077
Concomitant immunosuppression (%) Tacrolimus Mycophenolate mofetil Prednisone Cyclosporin Azathioprine
703528255
Adverse events (%) Fatigue Headache Arthralgia
282523
Grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities (%) 25/28
Key Results
55
Pre-Liver Transplant Sofosbuvir + RBV:Prevention of Recurrent HCV
● Open-label, phase 2 study (n=61)
- Listed for liver transplantation due to HCC (compensated cirrhosis)
- Genotype 1/2/3/4: 74%/13/12%/2%
- CPT <7 (95%), median MELD (8)
- Prior HCV treatment: 75%
● Up to 48 weeks of sofosbuvir 400 mg + RBV (1000-1200 mg) pre-transplant
● Primary endpoint: SVR12 post-liver transplant
- Strongest predictor: number of consecutive days with HCV RNA target not detected (odds ratio: 1.041; P<0.001)
Curry MP, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):314A-315A. Abstract 213.
TND: target not detected.Post-transplant, immunosuppressive regimen: tacrolimus + prednisone + mycophenolate mofetil.
Patients
HCV RNA <LLOQ (%) At transplant (n=44) 12-weeks post-transplant (n=39)
9364
Median time of continuously TND prior to transplant (days) No HCV recurrence (n=28) HCV recurrence (n=10)
95.05.5
Discontinuations due to adverse events (%)
3
Selected adverse events (%) Fatigue Anemia Headache Nausea Rash
3823231615
Key Results
56
Sofosbuvir Compassionate Use Program:Recurrent HCV Following Liver Transplantation
● Patients with severe recurrent HCV infection following liver transplantation
- Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis allowed
● Sofosbuvir 400 mg qd + RBV + pegIFN for up to 48 weeks
● Recommended time of clinical assessments
- On treatment: weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48
- Follow-up: weeks 4, 12, and 24
Forns X, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):732A-733A. Abstract 1084.
Sofosbuvir
RBV(n=32)
PR(n=12)
Male (%) 66 83
Age (years) 56 57
Genotype (%) 1a/1b 2/3/4 Mixed
28/530/13/0
6
42/258/8/8
8
ASL/ALT (IU/L) 124/223 81/112
Bilirubin (mg/dL) 7.9 2.6
MELD score 16 13
Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (%)
47 33
Time from liver transplantation (months)
40 31
Baseline Characteristics
PR: pegIFN + RBV.
57
Sofosbuvir Compassionate Use Program:Initial Treatment Evaluations
● Overall, liver function tests significantly improved over time
● Most patients improved clinically or remained stable
- Improved:* 64%
- Stable: 11%
- Declined/deceased: 25%
● Treatment-related serious adverse events (3%)
● Deaths (25%) were mostly a result of disease progression in this very sick population
Forns X, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):732A-733A. Abstract 1084.
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
SVR Rates
69%
57%
74%
60%
Overall(n=36/28)
Sofosbuvir + RBV
(n=27/20)
SVR4SVR12
Sofosbuvir + PR
(n=9/8)
56%50%
PR: pegIFN + RBV.*Improved: improvement in decompensation events (ie, significant decrease in hepatitic encephalopathy episodes, improvement or disappearance of ascites, and improvement in liver-related laboratory values.
58
Program Overview
● HCV and HBV: epidemiology and public health considerations
● Chronic HCV infection
- New and emerging HCV regimens
• Interferon-free regimens
• DAA + PR
- HCV/HIV coinfection and triple therapy
- Liver transplantation and triple therapy
● Chronic HBV infection
59
Korean Cohort: Impact of Entecavir and Lamivudine on Survival in HBV (1999-2011)
● Single-center cohort of chronic HBV (n=9615 treatment-naïve)
- Entecavir 0.5 mg/day or lamivudine 100 mg/day
- >20 years of age; no prior HCC, transplant, HCV, HDV, or HIV; HBV DNA >2000 IU/mL
● Treatment with entecavir was associated with
- Minimal risk of drug resistance 1.5% verus 50.8%; P<0.001)
- Minimal need for rescue therapy (1.8% verus 39.3%; P<0.001)
- Significantly lower risk of death or transplantation (adjusted hazard ratio 0.42; P<0.001)
Lim Y, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):223A. Abstract 32.
Cu
mu
lati
ve R
ates
(%
)
Years
Death or Transplantation(Propensity-Score-Matched)
Solid lines: cirrhoticsDotted lines: no cirrhosis
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
HR: 0.66P=0.005
Entecavir
Lamivudine
Lamivudine
Entecavir
HR: 1.10P=0.81
60
HCC Risk in Caucasian Chronic HBV Patients Treated With Entecavir or Tenofovir DF
● Multi-country cohort (Greece, Itlay, Turkey, Spain, The Netherlands) (n=1231)
- Chronic HBV with no co-infection, liver transplantation, or HCC
- Initiated either entecavir (43%) or tenofovir DF (55%)
● HCC 5-year incidence
- 4.2% at median of 17 months
- 13.5 new HCC cases/1000 person-years
● Strongest HCC risk factors
- Decompensated liver disease (HR: 2.78; P=0.019), lower platelet count (HR: 0.97; P=0.002), older age (HR: 1.05; P=0.12)
● Asian-based HCC risk scores may not be applicable to Caucasians with chronic HBV
Papatheodoridis GV, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):302A-303A. Abstract 190.
Cu
mu
lati
ve P
rob
abil
ity
Time Since Initiation of Treatment (Years)
Probability of HCC
Log-Rank P<0.001.
0 1 2 3 4 5
20.9%
DecompensatedCirrhosis 29.7%
No Cirrhosis2.5%
Cirrhosis
61
Study 103 and 102: 7-Year Tenofovir DF Treatment for Patients With Chronic HBV
Marcellin P, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):649A. Abstract 926.
48 WeeksDouble-Blind
Study 103* HBeAg-Positive Treatment-Naïve
Study 102* HBeAg-Negative
Lamivudine naïve or experienced
Tenofovir DF 300 mg
Adefovir 10 mg
Week 0 48 72 † 96 192 384
Randomization2:1
7 YearsOpen-Label
Tenofovir DF 300 mg
Tenofovir DF 300 mg
LiverBiopsy
CurrentAnalysis
*Pretreatment liver biopsy. Other eligibility criteria: age 18-69 years, compensated liver disease, HBV DNA >106 copies/mL, ALT >2 x ULN and <10 x ULN, Knodell necroinflammatory score >3, seronegative for HIV, HDV, and HCV. †If HBV DNA >400 copies/mL, option to add emtricitabine to tenofovir DF in a fixed-dose tablet.
62
Study 102 and 103: Virologic and Biochemical Suppression at Year 7
Marcellin P, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):649A. Abstract 926.
HBV DNA<400 copies/mL
(n=348/247)
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
HBeAg- (Study 102)HBeAg+ (Study 103)
1%
12%
77%
65%
HBsAg Loss(n=348/247)
ITT: missing=failure.
ALT Normalization(n=325/241)
60%
47%
63
Study 102 and 103: Virologic and Biochemical Suppression at Year 7
● No resistance to tenofovir DF was detect
● Virologic breakthrough was rare (<1.0%)
- Attributed to documented non-adherence in the majority of cases
● Tenofovir DF was well tolerated
- 75% of patients entering open-label phase remained on study at year 7
- Discontinuations due to adverse events: 2.2%
- Renal events were rare: 1.7%
- No evidence of bone loss over 3 years of follow-up
Marcellin P, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):649A. Abstract 926.
64
HBV Reactivation FollowingRituximab-Containing Chemotherapy
● Single-center cohort with a variety of hematologic diagnoses (n=62) (2011-2013)
- HBsAg negative, anti-HBc positive
- HBV DNA <10 IU/mL
- No concomitant liver disease or prior HBV treatment
- Reactivation: HBV DNA >10 IU/mL regardless of HBsAg status
- Follow-up: 36.6 months
● High rate of reactivation- Majority occurred within the first 6
months (86.7%)
- Presence of low anti-HBs levels was not protective against HBV reactivation
Seto W, et al. Hepatology. 2013;58(suppl 1):224A. Abstract 34.
Pro
bab
ilit
y o
f H
BV
Rea
ctiv
ati
on
(%
)
Months
Cumulative Rate ofHBV Reactivation
9-Month CumulativeRate: 29.3%
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96