Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
O 8l MInc Environmental Operations and
Maintenance Management
POST-CLOSURE SITE MONITORING REPORT
LANDFILL AND RESOURCE RECOVERY SUPERFUND SITE NORTH SMITHFIELD RHODE ISLAND
Suncr f t ind
S I T E
B R E A K
OTHER
Prepared on Behalf of
LANDFILL AND RESOURCE RECOVERY SITE GROUP
Prepared by
O amp M Inc 540 Hopmeadow Street
Suite 14 Simsbury CT 06070
September 2002
SDMS DocID 572979
PAPER
O 8L M Inc Environmental Operations and Maintenance Management
540 Hopmeadow Street Suite 14 Simsbury CT 06070
(860) 651-7669 Fax (860) 651-1218 ssawtesw
September 4 2002 BKEAK OTHER
Ms Anna Krasko US EPA Mail Code HBO One Congress Street Boston MA 02114
RE Transmittal of September 2002 Post-Closure Site Monitoring Report L amp RR Superfund Site North Smithfield Rhode Island
Dear Ms Krasko
Attached is one copy of the Post-Closure SiteMonitoring Report for September 2002 This report includes the results from the April 2002 groundwater and surface water sampling event Also attached is one copy of the Electronic Data Deliverable (Excel-compatible format) for the event
Please do not hesitate to call me at (908)735-9315 should you have any questions
Sincerely de maximis inc
John P McBurney Project Coordinator
cc D Moreira - Waste Management Inc (wo disk) W Diesl - Metcalf amp Eddy (wo disk) S Ducharme RIDEM (with disk containing gw data)
C My DocumentsMy DocumentsPROJECTSLampRRcvrltrSept02wpd
H a n o v e r P A bull C l i n t o n N J bull D a n v i l l e I N bull K n o x v i l l e T N bull L i v o n i a M l bull T a m p a F L bull H o l l y w o o d F L
W h i t e f i s h B a y W l bull S i m s b u r y C T bull R i d g e w a y S C bull P h i l p o t K Y
TABLE OF CONTENTS
10 INTRODUCTION 1
20 LANDFILL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE 1
30 LANDFILL GAS WELL AND PROBE MONITORING 2
40 DATA VALIDATION 3
50 GROUNDWATER MONITORING 3 51 Sample Collection 3 52 Quality Control Samples 4 53 Groundwater Analytical Results 4
531 Total and Dissolved Metals Results 4 54 Split Sample Comparability Results 4
60 SURFACE WATER MONITORING 5
70 AMBIENT AIR AND FLARE GAS INLET SAMPLING 5
80 PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED 5
90 ACTIVITIES PLANNED FOR NEXT REPORTING PERIOD 5
ii
TABLES
Table 1 Post-Closure MonitoringSampling Parameters and Methods Summary
Table 2 Data Qualifier Definitions by Matrix
Table 3 Water Level Monitoring Data
Table 4 Surface Water Chemistry Data
Table 5 Groundwater Chemistry Data
Table 6 Groundwater Chemistry Split Sample Comparisons
Table 7 Ambient Air Sampling Data
Table 8 Flare Inlet Sampling Data
FIGURES
Figure 1 Sample Location Plan
APPENDICES
Appendix A Inspection Reports
Appendix B Groundwater and Surface Water Data Validation Reports Severn Trent Laboratories
Appendix C Groundwater Data Validation Reports CompuChem Environmental Laboratories
Appendix D AirRECON Ambient Air and Flare Header Sampling Results
Appendix E Field Logs
10 INTRODUCTION
This Post-Closure SiteMonitoring Report documentsthe Post-Closure OperationandMaintenance activities performedby the Performing Settling Defendantsat theLandfill and Resource Recovery (LampRR) Superfund site de maximis inc coordinated all post-closure monitoring and maintenance activities at the site Activities performed were conducted in accordance with the Post-Closure Operation andMaintenance Plan de maximis inc September 1996 (Plan)
Groundwater and Surface water sampling were performed April 22 through 25 2002 The parameters for this sampling are presented in Table 1 of this report
This report has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Consent Decree and Remedial DesignRemedial Action Statement of Work This reportaddresses thoserequirements as indicated below
Post-Closure Site Monitoring Report Requirements Specified inthe Consent Decree Section of this Report Where the
bull and RDRA Statement of Work Requirement Is Addressed
a Map of the Site showing sample locations Figure 1 Sample Location Plan
b Tabular representation of laboratory results by 50 Groundwater Monitoring each media including comparison with any standard levels with accedences of maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) and other performance standards highlighted
c Laboratory results on a computer disc in a 50 Groundwater Monitoring spreadsheet file such as Lotus 1-2-3 or D-Base
d Data validation packages 40 Data Validation
e Results of statistical analysis of data 70 Statistical Analysis
f Interpretation of any trends 50 Groundwater Monitoring
g Inspection reports 20 Landfill Inspection and Maintenance
h Description of maintenance activities 20 Landfill Inspection and Maintenance completed
I Explanation of problems encountered in the 60 Problems Encountered field and measures taken to mitigate the problems
j Activities planned for the next reporting period 80 Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period
20 LANDFILL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE
The landfill cover drainage structures gas system and groundwater monitoring wells were inspected monthly with the resultsprovided on a monthly basis to EPA and RIDEMCopies of the inspection reports are presented in Appendix A
1
The landfill cover is in good condition Maintenance measures performed on the cover and gas system include
Sample valves for Gas wells R-14 and R-17 had air leaks Valves were fixedon May 72002
Gas wells R-7 R-12 R-13 R-14 R-16 R-17 and R-18 were adjusted from a partial opened position to a 100 open position on May 7 2002
Gas well R-14 was closed on May 9 2002 due to an apparent failure of the well
Semi annual blower and flare maintenance were completed by John Zinc Company LLC on May 21 and 22 2002 The upper high temperature thermocouple ceramic sleeve was cracked The thermocouple ceramic sleeve was replaced An airline was added to the condensate injection port to increase injection velocities and create a finer spray The results of that inspection indicate thatthe flare is in good condition and continues to functionproperly
Annual landfill ambient air and flare header samples were collected by AirRECON on June 5 and 6 2002 The results are presented in Appendix D
Potholes were foundand filledin on theperimeter roadonMay 30 andJuly 22002 Potholes were found and filled in on the crest road on July 2 2002
30 LANDFILL GAS WELL AND PROBE MONITORING
The landfill gas probes were monitored from April 2002 through August 2002 The results were provided on a monthly basis toEPA and RIDEM The system continues tooperate undernegative pressure controlling methane migration Methane migration data is presented below
Date MethaheCphtent ()
Probe GP-1 Probe GP-4 Probe GP-8
42302 01 01 02
5902 00 01 NM
53002 02 01 NM
7202 00 00 00
8102 00 00 00
82802 00 00 NM
The condensate injection system installed in December 1998 continued to treat condensate effectively
2
40 DATA VALIDATION
Analytical data for groundwater presented in this report were validated by Trillium Inc of Knoxville Tennessee using the most current revision of the EPA Region I Laboratory Data ValidationFunctionalGuidelinesforEvaluatingOrganicsandInorganicAnalysis(December1996) as appropriate for each analysis For analyses which do not have specific recommended guidelines for data review results were evaluated based on the supporting data submitted with the data packages and on the professional judgement of the validator Data qualifier codes by sample matrix applied by the Data Validator are presented in Table 2
Analyticaldata forthe Quality AssuranceQualityControl (QAQC) sampleswere submitted as part of the analytical data package provided to Trillium Inc for data validation The complete data validation reports are included in Appendix B (original field samples) and Appendix C (split sample)
50 GROUNDWATER MONITORING
Groundwater samples were collected on April 23 and 24 2002 in accordance with the Plan Figure 1 presents a groundwater sampling location plan On April 22 groundwater levels were measured at the monitoring wells The water level monitoring data for the wells sampled are presented in Table 3
Samples were collected from the seven monitoring wells in the groundwater monitoring network (MW-201 MW-202MW-102A MW-103A MW-104A CW-5B andCW-7A) The samples along with the required Quality AssuranceQuality Control (QAQC) samples were submitted to Severn Trent Laboratories (STL) in Shelton Connecticut for analysis A split sample from a single location (MW-104A) was provided to CompuChem Environmental Corporation (CompuChem) of Durham North Carolina for the same suite of parameters as the original sample The specific parameters for groundwater samples and analytical methods are presented in Table1
51 Sample Collection
The monitoring wells were purged and sampled using the EPA RegionILow Stress (low flow) Purging and Sampling Procedure for the Collection of Groundwater Samples from Monitoring Wells Revision 2 Purging and sampling of the monitoring wells was performedusing dedicated nitrogen-driven bladder pumps
Field measurements (eH pH temperature dissolved oxygen and specific conductance) were collected using a YSI Model 650MDS Closed Cell Water Quality Monitoring System as purging progressed Turbidity wasmeasured usinga LaMotte 2020 PortableTurbidity meterThe general field data collected duringpurging was recorded in a field logbook This information is presented in Appendix E The specific field data collected during purging wasrecorded on fieldlog sheets These log sheets have been misplaced If the field log sheets are located they will be forwarded immediately No problems were encountered in the field during purging and sampling
Groundwater samples were shipped each day via Federal Express next day delivery to STL of Shelton Connecticut for analysis A split sample from a single location(MW-104A) was provided to CompuChem Environmental Corporation (CompuChem) of Durham North Carolina for the
3
same suite of parameters as the original sample CompuChem subcontracted the CODand BOD analysis to Chemical amp Environmental Technology Inc located in Cary North Carolina
52 Quality Control Samples
All groundwater QAQC samples for analysis matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate analysis were collected from monitoring well CW-5B A duplicate sample was collected from monitoring location MW-102A A split sample was collected during the sampling event from monitoring location MW-104A for analysis of the same suite of parameters as the original sample The split sample was shipped via Federal Express next day delivery to CompuChem Trip blanks accompanied sample containers during shipmentand were submittedfor volatileorganic analysis
53 Groundwater Analytical Results
Analytical datapackages providedby STL were submittedto TrilliumInc ofKnoxville Tennessee for validation Data validation reports of the STL analyses for the April 2002 sampling event for groundwater are included in Appendix B of this report Data validation reports of the CompuChem analyses areincluded in Appendix C Data qualifier code definitions are presented in Table 2 and in the Attachments to each data validation report
A summary of the validated groundwater analytical data for the April2002 andprevious sampling events under the Plan are presented in Table 5 The table lists only the analytes that were detected in any sampling event in at least one sample and analytes for which the detection limit exceeded a standard
531 Total and Dissolved Metals Results
Comparison of total versus dissolved results for lead and arsenic in the groundwater samples revealed two cases where the dissolved concentration was higher than the total concentration (MW-104A and MW-CW-7A) Results for total and dissolved arsenic in MW-104A were qualified as estimated (J) dueto a significant discrepancy betweenthe measured concentrations of the two analysis fractions as evaluated in the Data Validation Report (Appendix B)
54 Split Sample Comparability Results
In accordance with the Plan a split sample from monitoring location MW-104A was analyzed by the primary laboratory STL and by a secondary laboratory CompuChem
Data from the primary and secondary laboratories were evaluated for comparability using the procedure outlined in the Plan Table 6 provides a comparison of the analytical results from both laboratories
The data are not comparable according to the criteria in the Plan and EPA EPA stated the following in their comments regarding the June 2001 report
The comparison criteria used by EPA for comparison of data for a multi-analyte analysis is that 75 or more of the detected analytes must meet criteria
Twelve (12) of the sixteen (16) or 75 of the organic analytes detected in MW-104A (listed in
4
Table 6) have comparable data Therefore the organic data from the two laboratories are considered comparable for this round of groundwater sampling
Four (4) of the seven (7) or 57 of the organic analytes detected in MW-104A (listed in Table 6) have comparable data The metals parameters are not comparable
60 SURFACE WATER MONITORING
Surface water samples were collected on April25 2002 from six (SW-5 SW-8 SW-10 SW-16 LCH-3 and LCH-4) of the seven surface water monitoring locations A sample was not collected at location LCH-5 as this location was dry
Surface water samples were submitted to STLfor analysis Data from the surface water samples are presentedin Table 4 Data validation reports for the surface water samples are presented in Appendix B
70 AMBIENT AIR AND FLARE GAS INLET SAMPLING
Ambient air and flare gas sampling was performed by AirRECON on June 5 and 6 2002 Five ambient air samples were collected around the perimeter of the landfill at locations identified in Figure 1using Method TO-14 canisters These samples were submitted to AirRECON located in Raritan New Jersey for analysis Data for the ambient air samples are presented in Table 7 of this report Only the analytes detected in at least one sample and analytes for which the detection limit exceeded a standard are included in Table 8 Laboratory data for the ambient air samples is provided in Appendix D
On June 5 one Method 18 grab sample was collectedby AirRECON over a 4-hour period at the header of the flare This sample was then shipped to AirRECON located in Raritan New Jersey for analysis Data for the ambient air samples are presented in Table 8 of this report The laboratory data for this sample is presented in Appendix D of this report
80 PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED
No problems were encountered in the field during purging and sampling
90 ACTIVITIES PLANNED FOR NEXT REPORTING PERIOD
Activities planned for the next reporting period (September 2002 through March 2003) are
Activity Schedule Landfill Inspection Monthly Gas Treatment System Operation Continuous Extraction System Monitoring Monthly Methane Migration Monitoring Monthly Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring October 2002 Annual Landfill Settlement Monument Elevation Survey October 2002
CMy DocumentsWIy DocumentsPROJECTSLampRRSemiAnnua[ReportSept2002wpd
5
OampMInc Environmental Operations and
Maintenance Management
Tables
4reg PAPER
Table 1
POST-CLOSURE MONITORINGSAMPLING PARAMETERS AND METHODS SUMMARY
Sampling Medium Parameter and Method
GROUNDWATER
FIELD PARAMETERS
for surface water and groundwater
SURFACE WATER
AMBIENT AIRFLARE INLET
FLARE INLET
VOCs
Arsenic (Total) Arsenic (Dissolved) Lead (Total) Lead (Dissolved) Chloride Iron Ammonia COD BOD
eH
PH
DO Specific conductance VOCs
Arsenic (Total) Arsenic (Dissolved) Chloride
VOCs
VOCs
8260B
6010B Trace 6010B Trace 6010B Trace 6010B Trace 352(1 2 3)
6010B 3502
410 (1 2) 4051
8260B
6010B Trace 6010B Trace 325(1 2 3)
TO-14
Method 18TO-14
TABLE 2 DATA QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS BY MATRIX
GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER Severn Trent Laboratories
Volatile Organics in Groundwater and Surface Waters
EPA RegionIQualifier Definitions
U - The material was analyzed for but was not detected The associated numerical value is the sample quantitation limit The sample quantitation limit accounts for the sample-specific dilution factors and percent solids corrections or sample sizes that deviate from those required by the method
J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity
R - The data are unusable (analyte may or may notbe present) Resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification The R replaces the numerical value or sample quantitation limit
UJ - The material was analyzed for but was not detected The sample quantitation limit is an estimated quantity
TOTAL AND DISSOLVED METALS IN GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATERS Severn Trent Laboratories
EPA RegionIQualifier Definitions
U - The materialwas analyzedfor butwas not detected abovethe levelof the associated value The associated value is either the sample quantitation limit or the sample detection limit
J - The associated value is an estimated quantity
R - The data are unusable (Note Analyte may or may not be present)
UJ - The material was analyzed for but was not detected The associated value is an estimate and may be inaccurate or imprecise
AMMONIA CHLORIDE BOD AND COD IN GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATERS Severn Trent Laboratories
EPA RegionIQualifier Definitions
U - The materialwas analyzedfor butwas not detected above thelevel of the associatedvalue The associated value is either the sample quantitation limit or the sample detection limit
J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity
R - The data are unusable (Note Analyte may or may not be present)
UJ - The material was analyzed for but was not detected The associated value is an estimate and may be inaccurate or imprecise
TABLE 2 Continued DATA QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS BY MATRIX
GROUNDWATER Compuchem Laboratories
Volatile Organics inGroundwater
EPA RegionIQualifier Definitions
U - The materialwas analyzedfor butwas not detected The associatednumerical valueis the sample quantitation limit The sample quantitiation limit accounts for the sample-specific dilution factors and percent solids corrections or sample sizes that deviate from those required by the method
J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity
R - The data are unusable (compound may or may notbe present) Resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification The R replaces the numerical value or the sample quantitation limit
UJ - The material was analyzed for but was not detected The sample quantitation limit is an estimated quantity
TOTAL AND DISSOLVED METALS IN GROUNDWATER Compuchem Laboratories
Inorganic Analysis in Groundwater
EPA Region t Qualifier Definitions
U - The materialwas analyzedfor but was not detected abovethe levelof the associatedvalue The associated value is either the sample quantitation limit or the sample detection limit
J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity
R - The data are unusable (Note Analyte may or may not be present)
UJ - The material was analyzed for but was not detected The associated value is an estimate and may be inaccurate or imprecise
CHLORIDE BOD COD AND AMMONIA IN GROUNDWATER Wet Chemistry In Groundwater
Test America
EPA RegionIQualifier Definitions
U - The material was analyzed for but was not detected above the level of the associated value The associated value is either the sample quantitation limit or the sample detection limit
J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity
R - The data are unusable (Note Analyte may or may not be present)
UJ - The material was analyzed for but was not detected The associated value is an estimate and may be inaccurate or imprecise
TABLE 2 Continued
VOLATILES IN AIR Air Toxics Limited
EPA RegionIQualifierDefinitions
U - The material was analyzedfor butwas notdetected above the levelof the associated value The associated value is either the sample quantitation limit or the sample detection limit
J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity
R - The data are unusable (Note Analyte may or may not be present)
UJ - The material was analyzed for but was not detected The associated value is an estimate and may be inaccurate or imprecise
CMy DocumentsMy DocumentsPROJECTSLampRRTABLE2WPD
TABLE 3 WATER LEVEL MONITORING DATA LampRR SUPERFUND SITE April 2002
Monitoring Geologic Hydro- Top of Ground Pump Location Unit|1J geologic Casing Surface Intake Total Screened Water Water
Unit(2) Elevation Elevation Depth Depth(i| Interval Level Elevation (ftamsi) (ftamsi) (fbtoc) (fbtoc) (fbtoc) (fbtoc) (ftamsi)
MW -101 BR FR BR 32907 32640 None 8260 742shybull795 NM NM MW-102A UN IC 25803 25590 69 7812 627shybull733 1285 24518 MW-102B UN K 25374 25110 35 4205 289shybull394 NM NM MW-103A BR FR BR 26848 26548 50 6311 392shybull551 1734 25114 MW-103B UN K 26857 26550 20 3006 120shybull218 NM NM MW-104A UN IC 26354 26054 52 5563 435shybull540 1742 24612 MW-104B UN K 26377 26077 22 2572 145bull240 NM NM CW-5A BR FR BR 30431 30200 134 13611 1250shybull 1350 NM NM CW-5B UN IC 30392 30200 98 10353 920shy 1020 5612 24780 CW-5C UN K 30398 30240 62 6941 485shybull685 NM NM CW-6A BR FR BR 26406 26230 89 9353 820shybull920 NM NM CW-6B UN IC 26174 26150 59 6296 510shybull610 NM NM CW-6C UN K 26398 26130 25 3461 130shybull330 NM NM CW-7A UN IC 25559 25490 42 5796 370shybull470 650 24909 CW-7B UNBR ICFR BR 25550 25300 None 5300 430 -530 NM NM CW-7C UNBR K 25505 25450 26 3655 70shy 270 NM NM MW-201 UNBR IC 32025 31804 79 89 00 690 -890 7800 24225 MW-202 UNBR IC 25326 25143 285 3860 210 -386 1300 24026 Notes
ftamsi feet above mean sea level ftbtoc feet below top of casing
(1) BR - Bedrock UN - Unconsolidated
(2) FR BD - Fractional Bedrock K- Kame IC - Ice Contact
(3) - As presented in well boring logs
TABLE 4 SURFACE WATER CHEMISTRY DATA LampRR SUPERFUND SITEAPRIL 2002
MONITORING LOCATION Surface Water Criteria SW-5 SW-DUP SW-8 SW-10 SW-16 LCH-3 LCH-4 LCH-S Fresh Water (ugL) Duplicate
Criterion of SW-5 Maximum Continuous
Sample Designation TCL VOLATILES (ugL)
11-Dichloroethane 05 U 05 03 02 05 05 100 NS Chloroethane 05 U 05 05 09 05 05 210 NS p-isopropyltoluene 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 NS 12-Dichlorobenzene 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 NS 14-Dichlorobenzene 05 05 10 05 05 05 05 NS Toluene 05 05 02 05 03 05 60 NS mp Xylene 10 10 01 10 10 10 40 NS o-Xylene 05 05 01 05 05 05 40 NS Isopropylbenzene 05 05 08 05 05 05 50 NS Ethylbenzene 05 05 05 05 05 05 60 NS Vinyl Chloride 05 05 05 U 05 05 05 05 NS Acetone 50 UJ 50 UJ 60 UJ 50 UJ 50 UJ 50 UJ 60 UJ NS Methylene Chloride 05 05 05 05 05 05 09 NS trans-12-Dichloroethene 05 U 05 05 05 05 05 07 NS cis-12-Dichloroethene 05 U 05 01 05 05 05 30 NS Benzene 05 U 05 05 05 05 05 40 NS 12-Dichloroethane 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 NS Trichloroethene 05 05 05 05 05 05 03 NS 12-Dichloropropane 05 05 05 05 05 05 30 NS Chlorobenzene 05 05 10 05 05 05 40 NS 135-Trimethylbenzene 05 05 03 05 05 05 30 NS 124-Trimethylbenzene 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 NS 4-Chlorotoluene tert-Butylbenzene
05 05
05 05
01 05
05 05
05 03
05 05
05 30
NS NS
Naphthalene 05 UJ 05 UJ 05 UJ 10 05 UJ 05 UJ 30 NS n-Propylbenzene 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 UJ NS 13-Dichlorobenzene 05 05 05 05 05 05 08 NS P-lsopropyttoluene 05 05 05 05 03 05 05 NS 2-Butanone 50 50 60 UJ 05 50 50 50 NS
TOTAL METALS fugU Arsenic 360 190 12 37 NS
DISSOLVED METALS JugL) Arsenic 360 190 12 NS
WET CHEMISTRY PARAMETER Chlorides (maJL) 320 32 33 38 48 190 49 NS
FIELD PARAMETERS pH (Standard units) 674 674 645 709 693 691 627 NS Temperature (CI NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS Conductivity (mhoscm) 135 135 515 421 127 94 434 NS
Notes (1) - Concentrations reference Federal Register Vol 57 No 246 December 221992 Rules and Regulations 60911
f tom353qprosurfecewater42000 wb3
Table S Groundwater Chemistry Data Detected Analytes LampRR Superfund Site April 2002
5NITORING WELL MCL (2) MW-102A
Oct 1996 Feb 1997 June 1997 Oct 1997 Feb 1998 June 1998
rCL VOLATILES (ugL) SDichlorodifluoromethane 35 J 22 32 2 U 26 Chloromethane 5 U 1 U 1 U 2 U sinyl Chloride 20 20 24 26 30 Chloroethane 100 58 56 S3 47 Trichlorofluoromethane 11- Dichloroethene
5 U 1 U
1 U 1 U
1 U 1 U 1 U 1 u
1 J 2 U
Acetone 5 U 5 U J 5 U Methylene Chloride trans-12-Dichloroethene 100
5 U 5 U
2 U J 2 J 4 J 1 U
2 U
011 - Qchloroethane 180 130 110 J 110 120 J sis-12-Dichloroethene 2-Butanone
70 46 5 U
43 1 U
1 U 100 1 U 1 u
110 J 2 U
Chloroform 11 1 1 - T richloroethane 200 5 U 1 U 2 U iBenzene 12 10 112 - Dichloroethane 18 16 13 13 12 rrichloroethene 15 18 25 31 31 12- Dichloropropane 2 U 4-Methyl-2-pentanone Toluene 1000 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U Tetrachloroethene 11 15 25 35 34 J Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene
100 700
24 5 U
21 21 161 U 1 U
16 2 U
mp Xylenes o-Xylene Stvrene
M J4)
5 U 5 U 5 U
1 J 1 U
1 U 1 U 1 u 1 U 1 U
2 U 2 U 2 U
Isopropylbenzene Bromobenzene S U 5 U
1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U
123 Trichloropropane n-Propylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene 135-T rimethylbenzene
5 U 5 U 5 U
1 U 1 U 5 J
1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U
2 U 2 U 2 U
Tert-butylbenzene 124-T rimethylbenzene 13-Diehlorobenzerie
5 U 1 U 1 U
1 U 1 U 1 U
2 U 1 U
p-lsopropyltoluene 5 U 08 J 07 J 1 U 2 U 14-Dichlorobenzene 75 12-dichlorobenzene 600 5 U 1 J 124 Tnchlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene 1 2 3 - Tnchlorobenzene
5 U 1 U
2 J 1 U
1 U 1 U 1 U
1 J 1 u
DISSOLVED TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 50 18 6 J 184 145 150 15 5 Lead 15 1 0 U 141 U 1 42 U 142 U 142 U
TOTAL TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 50 166 J 17 9 147 156 159 Iron 300(1) 55400 57600 49400 44500 48400 Lead 15 1 0 U 141 U 174 J 142 U 142 U
INDICATOR PARAMETERS (mgL) Ammonia 0624 067 060 068 062 COD 269 122 14_ lt10 10 u BOD 42 9 1 10 7 J 12 Chloride 250(1) 600 J 1300 80 8 J
Notes
(1gt-Secondary standards are as noted
(3)-Soiace Drinking Water Regteadons and Heath Advisories Office ofWtes USEPA Documerd NurdwrEPA 822-B-96-002 October 1996
(d)-Concentrations(or o-xyleneandm p-xylenes shotidbeadded tortotalxylene eoncenfraBon TotalXyleneMCLis10000 uglL
ApriTTablesQ2 wb3
Table 5 Groundwater Chemistry Data Detected Analytes LampRR Superfund Site April 2002
MONITORING WELL MCL (2) MW-102A
Oct 1998 Mar 1999 Oct 1999 July 2000 Nov 2000 April 2001 October 2001 April 2002
TCL VOLATILES (ugL) Dichlorodiftuoromethane 20 2 UJ 46 J 27 24 18 J 24 19 Chloromethane 1 U 1 UJ 1 u 5 U 5 U 5 UJ 06 U 10 u Vinyl Chloride 21 40 26 46 39 44 J 30 28 Chloroethane 34 25 J 1 U 28 24 22 17 15 Tnchlorofluoromethane 1 U 1 U 5 U 22 J 5 U 05 U 10 U 11 - Dichloroethene 06 J 1 U 1 U 5 U 5 U 5 U 12 10 U Acetone 2 U 100 U J R 120 UJ 12 UJ 100 UJ Methylene Chloride 2 U J 2 U 15 J 32 UJ 21 UJ 15 UJ 12 U 10 u trans-12-Didiloroethene 100 24 36 J 42 J 52 38 6 J 11 - Dichloroethane 100 130 109 160 170 140 110 150 cis-12-Dichloroethene 70 130 180 170 230 270 270 240 290 2-Qutanone 1 U 1 U 1 U 60 UJ 100 U Chloroform 31 J 05 U 10 U 1 1 1 -Trichloroethane 200 1 U 1 u 1 u 5 U 5 U 5 U 05 U 10 U Benzene 76 10 10 98 J 87 J 10 U 12 - Dichloroethane 10 12 1 U 15 14 10 J 10 9 J Trichloroethene 38 52 50 77 78 64 J 44 62 12- Dichloropropane 4 1 64 66 5 U 62 10 U 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 5 U 10 u Toluene 1000 1 U 1 U 1 U 095 J 5 U 5 UJ 0 5 UJ 10 U Teirachloroethene 46 70 53 55 J 67 J 67 J 64 95 Chlorobenzene 100 12 15 89 72 51 4 J Ethylbenzene 700 1 U 1 u 1 u 5 U 5 U 5 UJ 0 5 UJ 10 U mp Xylenes o-Xylene
M M
1 U 06 J
1 u 1 U
1 u 1 U
10 u 5 U
10 u 5 U
10 UJ 5 UJ
0 5 UJ 032 J
10 u 10 U
Styrene 1 U 1 U 1 U 5 U 5 U 5 UJ 0 5 UJ 10 U Isopropylbenzene 1 U 35 41 J 41 J 36 J 29 J 3 J Bromobenzene 1 U 1 U 1 U 05 U 5 U 5 UJ 05 UJ 10 U 123 Tnchloropropane 05 U 10 U n-Propylbenzene 1 U 1 U 1 u 5 U 5 U 5 UJ 05 UJ 10 U 2-Chlorotoluene 1 U 1 U 1 U 5 U 5 U 5 UJ 05 UJ 10 UJ 35-Trimethylbenzene 1 U 1 U 1 u 5 U 5 U 5 UJ 05 UJ 10 U
Tert-butylbenzene 5 U 5 UJ 05 UJ 10 U 124-Trimethylbenzene 1 U 1 U 1 u 5 U 5 U 5 UJ 05 UJ 10 U 13-Dichkgtrobenzene 1 U 1 U 1 U 5 U 5 U 5 UJ 014 J 10 U p-lsopropyttoluene 1 u 1 u 5 U 5 U 5 U 5 U 05 U 10 U 14-Dichlorobenzene 75 1 U 42 55 59 45 J 5 J 10 U 12-dichtorobenzene 600 1 U 1 U 0 93 J 5 U 5 UJ 061 J 10 U 124 Tnchlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene
05 UJ 10 u 10 u
Maphthalene 08 J 2 UJ 2 UJ 5 U 5 U J 5 UJ 10 UJ 1 2 3 - Tnchlorobenzene 1 U 1 UJ 1 UJ 5 U 5 U 5 UJ 05 UJ 10 u
DISSOLVED TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 50 142 14 4 J 186 17 6 J 174 118 936 J 14 Lead 15 0464 U 0464 UJ 130 30 U J 0 50 UJ 10 U 11 U 095 U
TOTAL TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 50 16 0 159 J 180 185 273 158 856 20 Iron 300(1) 43100 49000 35400 37200 36400 27100 75200 J 350000 Lead 15 353 347 30 U J 050 U J 10 U 10 u 10 u
INDICATOR PARAMETERS (mgL) Ammonia 13 0564 J 0496 0409 025 J 0322 0546 0 51 COD BOD
23 18 13
lt5_ 10_
5 U 146
16 14 2
10 0 UJ 131
100 101
261 10 J
Chloride 250(1) lt5 373 741 498 492 486
Note
(1) -Secondary standard ve a notad
(2) -Soiree OrWdng Water RepMona and Heath Advisories OAca of Water USEPA Documert Mjmtwr EPA 8 22-S-96-002 October 1996
(4) -Coneertratlons for o-xytene and m p bull xylene should be added (or total xylene concertreban Total Xylene MCL Is 10000 ugfL
ApriTTbles02 wb3
Table S Groundwater Chemistry Data Detected Analytes LampRR Superfund Site April 2002
MONITORING WELL MCL (2) MW-103A
Oct 1996 Feb 1997 June 1997 Oct 1997 Feb 1998 June 1998
TCL VOLATILES (ugL) Dichlorodiftuoromethane 5 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 2 UJ Chtoromethane 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 UJ Vinyl Chloride 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 UJ Chloroethane 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 UJ Tnchlorofluofomethane 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 UJ 11 Dichloroethene 5 U 1 U 1 u 1 u 2 UJ Acetone 5 U 5 U J 1 U Methylene Chloride 5 U 2 U J 2 U 1 U 2 UJ trans-12-Dichlofoethene 100 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 UJ 11 - Dichloroethane 5 U 1 U 1 u 1 u 2 UJ is-i2-Oichloroethene 70 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 UJ 2-Butanone 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U Chloroform 1 11 - Trichloroethane 200 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 UJ Benzene 5 U 1 u 1 u 1 u 2 UJ 12 - Dichloroethane 5 U 1 U 1 u 1 u 2 UJ rnchloroethene 5 U 1 U 1 u 1 u 2 UJ
112- Dichloropropane 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 UJ -Methvl-2-pentanone
Toluene 1000 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 UJ Fetrachloroethene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 UJ Dhlorobenzene 100 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 UJ
llEthylbenzene 700 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 UJ Imp Xylenes J41 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 UJ
bull-Xylene M 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 UJ tyrene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 UJ
ilsopropylbenzene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 UJ 3romobenzene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 U 123 Tnchloropropane n-Propylben2ene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 UJ 2-Chlorotoluene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 UJ 135-Trimethvlbenzene 5 U 1 U 1 u 1 u 2 UJ Tert-butvlbenzene 124-Trimethylbenzene 5 U 1 U 1 u 1 u 2 UJ 13-Dichlorobenzene 1 U 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u a-lsopropyltoluene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 UJ 14-Dichlorobenzene 75 S U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 UJ 12-dichlorobenzene 600 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 UJ 124 Trichtorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Maphthalene 5 U 2 U J 2 U 1 U 2 UJ 1 2 3 - Tnchlorobenzene 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 U J
DISSOLVED TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 50 14 J 3 31 U 332 U 332 U 332 U Lead 15 1 0 U 1 41 U 142 U 142 U 142 U
TOTAL TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 50 12 J 3 31 U 332 U 332 U 332 U Iron 300(1) 553 162 106 U 298 J 104 U Lead 15 10 U 141 U 142 U 142 U 142 U
INDICATOR PARAMETERS (mgL) Ammonia 0 04 U 0040 U 0040 U 0040 U 0040 U COD 100 UJ lt100 10 U 10 10 U BOD 2 U lt2 0 2 U 2 UJ Chloride 250(1) 300 13
Notes
(1)-Secondary standards are as noted
(2) -Source Drinkng Water Regulations end Healh Advisories Office of Water USEPA Oocumenl Nun-ber EPA 6Z2-B-96-002 October 1996
(4) -Concentrations for o-xytene and m p - xylenes should be added (or total xylene concertration Total Xylene MCL Is 10000 ugfl
AorHTebles02 wb3
Table 5 Groundwater Chemistry Data Detected Analytes LampRR Superfund Site April 2002
MONITORING WELL MCL (2) MW-103A
Oct 1998 Mar 1999 Oct 1999 July 2000 Nov 2000 April 2001 Oct 2001 April 2002
TCL VOLATILES (ugL) Dichlorodrfluoromethane 2 U 2 UJ 2 UJ 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 U Chloromethane 1 U 1 UJ 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 U Vinyl Chloride 1 U 1 u 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Chloroethane 1 U 1 UJ 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Trichlorofluoromethane 1 U 1 U 1 u 05 U 05 U 0 5 UJ 05 U 11 - Dichloroethene 1 U 1 U 1 u 05 U as u 05 U 05 U Acetone 1 U R R 12 UJ 12 U Methylene Chloride 2 U J 2 U 2 U 1 UJ 1 UJ 021 UJ 10 U rans-12-Qichloroethene 100 1 U 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 11 bull Dichtoroethane 1 U 1 U 1 u 0 1 J 05 U 05 U 05 U cis-12-Dichloroethene 70 1 U 1 U 1 U 05 U as u 05 U 05 U 2-Butanone 1 u 1 u 1 u R 6 UJ Chloroform 05 U 1 1 1 bull Trichloroethane 200 1 U 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Benzene 2 U 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 12 - Dichtoroethane 1 U 1 U 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Trichloroethene 1 U 1 U 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 12- Dichloropropane 1 U 1 U 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 5 U Toluene 1000 1 U 1 u 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ Tetrachloroethene 1 U 1 u 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Chlorobenzene 100 1 u 1 u 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Ethylfaenzene 700 1 U 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 0 5 UJ 05 UJ mp Xylenes 1 U 1 u 1 u 1 U 1 UJ 1 UJ 1 UJ o-Xylene 1 u 1 u 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ Styrene 1 U 1 U 1 u 05 U 05 U 0 5 UJ 05 UJ Isopropylbenzene 1 U 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 0 5 UJ 05 UJ Bromobenzene 1 U 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 123 Trichloropropane 05 U n-Propylberi2ene 1 U 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 U 2-Chlorotoluene 1 U 1 U 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 135-Tnmethylbenzene 1 U 1 U 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ Tert-butylbenzene 05 U 0 5 UJ 05 UJ 124-Tnmethylbenzene 1 U 1 U 1 U OS u 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 13Oichlorobenzene 1 U 1 U 1 u 05 U 05 U 0 5 UJ 05 UJ o-lsopropyltoluene 1 U 1 U 5 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 14-Dichlorobenzene 75 1 U 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 12-dichtorobenzene 600 1 u 1 u 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 124 Trichlorobenzene 0 5 UJ Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene 2 U 2 UJ 2 UJ 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 1 2 3 bull Trichlorobenzene 1 U 1 UJ 1 UJ 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ
DISSOLVED TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 50 1 08 U 2 87 U 075 U 14 J 09 U 090 U Lead 15 0464 U 0464 UJ 0464 U 060 U J 050 U J 1 UJ 10 U
TOTAL TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic Iron Lead
50 300M)
15 116
0690 J
1 08 U 126
0464 UJ
231 U 682 J
0 490 J
0 80 J 080 U J 138 J 234 J 060 UJ 050 UJ
11
108 J 10 u
094 J 774 10 u
INDICATOR PARAMETERS (mgL) Ammonia 028 0313 00400 U 00400 U lt020 00420 0222 COD lt5 lt10 lt5 5 U lt5 100 u 10-0 U IBOD lt2 lt2 96 20 UJ 22 20 U 20 U [Chloride lt5 365 358 291 320 312
Note
(1) bull Secondary standards are as noted
() - Source OrlnWng Water Regulations and Health Advisories Office of Water USEPA Document Number EPA 822-B-96-002 October 1996
(4) -Concentrations tor e-ylene and m p -xylenes shouldbe added lor total xylene eoneertratton Total Xylene MCL Is 10000 ugl
Ap(1ITables02wb3
Table 5 Groundwater Chemistry Data Detected Analytes LampRR Superfund Site April 2002
MONITORING WELL MCL (2) MW-104A
Oct 1996 Feb 1997 June 1997 Oct 1997 Feb 1998 June 1998 Oct 1998 Mar 1999
TCL VOLATILES (ugL) Dichtorodifluoromethane 5 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride
5 U 5 U
1 U 09 J 1 U
1 U 2 U 1 U 2 U
1 UJ 1 U
1 U 1 U
Chloroethane Trichiorofluoromelhane 11 - Dichtoroetherte
110 5 U 5 U
58 1 U 1 U
62 1 U 1 U
45 48 1 U 2 U
2 U
44 1 U 1 U
24 1 U 1 J
Acetone 5 U 5 U J 5 U 12 J 2 U Methylene Chloride rans-12-Otchloroethene 100
5 U 7 J 1 u
7 J 4 J 4 J 1 u 1 J
2 U 1 J 09 J
11 bull Oichloroethane cis-12-Dichloroethene 70
45 36 1 U
38 1 U
32 36 1 U 2 U
41 1 U
27
2-Butanone 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U 1 U Chloroform 1 1 1 - Tnchloroethane Benzene
200 5 U 18
1 U 14
1 U 15
1 u 2 U 16 17
1 U 18
1 U 12
12 - Dichloroethane 13 11 10 12 Tnchloroethene 5 U 07 J 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U 1 u 12- Dtchloropropane 10 2 U 10 4-Methyl-2-pentanone Toluene Tetrachloroethene
1000 13 5 U
10 1 U
10 1 u 1 u 2 U 1 U 1 u
Chlorobenzene 100 10 Ethylbenzene 700 150 120 150 J 140 130 J 150 130 mp Xylenes o-Xylene Stvrene
J41 140 60 5 U
120 J 1 U 1 U
150 J 62 J 1 U
150 130 J 59 51 J 1 u 2 U
150 62 1 u
100 43 1 u
isopropylbenzene Bromobenzene
38 5 U
28 1 U
31 1 U
24 27 1 u 2 U
22 1 u
17 1 u
123 Tnchtoropropane n-Propylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene
5 U 5 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U 1 u
135-Tnmethylbenzene 25 22 10 Tert-butylbenzene 124-Trimethylbenzene 27 24 26 32 35 34 28 13-Dichlorobenzene 1 U 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 J o-lsopropyttoluene 10 J 10 12 13 12 14-Dichlorobenzene 75 18 15 17 20 22 26 24 12-dichlorobenzene 600 5 U 124 Trichlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene 46 2 UJ 48 35 25 J 53 41 1 2 3- Tnchlorobenzene 1 U 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 UJ 05 J
DISSOLVED TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 50 820 968 J 795 106 J 825 J 797 J 685 Lead 15 10 U 141 U 1 42 U 142 U 142 U 142 U 0464 U
TOTAL TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 50 929 764 J 850 929 J 627 J 712 J 817 Iron 300(11 115000 98400 117000 86400 104000 104000 126000 Lead 15 86 692 165 579 106 100 423
INDICATOR PARAMETERS (mgL) Ammonia 22 8 205 190 188 183 20 J 87 COO 222 200 300 190 73 190 250 BOD 24 J 42 J 51 J 30 J 23 20 28 Chlonde 250(1) 344 320 380 370 360 250 330
Moles
(1) - Secondary standards are as noted
(2) -Soiree Dnrttng Water Repdetnns and Healh MvtsorteOffice of Water USEPA Doomert Number EPA 822-B-96-002 October 1996
(4) -Concentrations tor o-xylene and m p - xylenes shoUd be added for total xylene concentration Total Xylene MCLIs 10000 ugfl
ApniTables02laquob3
Table 5 Groundwater Chemistry Data Detected Anatytes LampRR Superfund Site April 2002
MONITORING WELL MCL (2) MW-104A Split Sample
Oct 1999 July 2000 Nov 2000 April 2001 Oct 2001 April 2002 April 2002
TCL VOLATILES (ugL) Dichlorodifluoromethane 11 J 5 U 5 U 5 UJ 14 5 U Chloromethane 1 U 5 U 5 U 5 UJ 05 U 5 U Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane
1 U 1 U
5 U 49
5 U 36
32 J 43
05 U 28
5 U 33
T richlorofluoromethane 1 U 5 U 5 U 5 U 05 U 5 U 11 - Dichloroethene 1 U 5 U 5 U 5 U 05 U 5 U Acetone 160 U J 240 J 26 J 12 UJ 50 UJ Methylene Chloride 22 J 18 U J 36 U J 15 UJ 19 U 4 J trans-12-Dichloroethene 100 11 18 J 5 U 28 J 3 J 11 - Dichloroethane 27 40 58 93 97 130 cts-12-Oichtoroethene 70 1 U 5 U 5 U 26 J 29 4 J 2-Butanone 1 U 5 U 60 UJ 50 U Chloroform 29 J 05 U 5 U 1 11 - Trichloroethane 200 1 U 5 U 5 U 5 U 05 U 5 U Benzene 12 24 25 35 J 24 J 28 12 - Dichloroethane 1 U 5 U 5 U 53 Trichloroethene 1 U 5 U 5 U 5 UJ 013 J 5 U 12- Dichloropropane 1 U 10 98 5 U 86 5 U 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 46 J 5 U Toluene 1000 91 10 U 10 J 10 J Tetrachloroetherte 1 u 5 U 5 U 5 U 05 U 2 J Chlorobenzene 100 70 10 13 05 U 12 Sthylbenzene mp Xylenes
700 Jlt1
104 120
140 350 J
120 130
120 J 270 J
84 J 86 J
100 110
o-Xylene Jpound1 44 63 57 64 J 46 J 46 Styrene 1 U 2 1 J 5 U 5 UJ 05 UJ 5 U Isopropylbenzene 17 23 19 23 J 13 J 13 Bromobenzene 1 U 5 U 5 U 5 UJ 0 5 UJ 5 U 123 Trichtoropropane 05 U 5 U n-Propylbenzene 7 1 48 J 44 J 54 J 27 5 U 2-Chlorotoluene 1 U 5 U 64 38 J 05 UJ 5 UJ 135-Trimethvlbenzene 24 J 12 13 15 J 95 J 43 Tert-butvlbenzene 44 J 63 J 05 UJ 14 124-Trimethylbenzene 1 U 42 40 47 J 27 J 28 13-Dichlorobenzene 1 U 0 88 J 068 J 12 J 076 J 5 U p-lsopropyltoluene 5 U 5 U 12 10 63 14-Dichlorobenzene 75 21 33 35 39 J 27 J 37 12-dichlorobenzene 600 56 66 71 7 J 42 J 124 Trichtorobenzene 062 J 5 U Hexachlorobutadiene 5 U Naphthalene 36 J 59 65 48 J 34 J 42 J 1 2 3 - Trichlorobenzene 1 UJ 5 U 5 U 5 UJ 05 UJ 5 U
DISSOLVED TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 50 989 J 869 100 838 179 J 110J
Lead 15 0464 U 30 U J 25 U J 10 U 1 0 U 095 U
TOTAL TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 50 723 J 947 100 951 130 J 620 J Iron 300(1) 102000 89100 71800 54900 33800 65800 Lead 15 102 42 J 25 U J 11 10 U 18
INDICATOR PARAMETERS (mgL) mmonia 217 22 6 24 285 251 23 CD 151 220 372 165 179 949
IBOD 257 J 223 194 341 220 40 J Monde 250(1) 374 419 409 318 316 270
Notes
lt11 -Secondary standards ere es rioted
(2) -Soiree Dnrtong Water Regulations end Heath Advisories Office of Water USEPA Docwnent Nutter EPA B22-8-9amp002 October 1996
(4) -Concertebons for o-xytene andm p- xylenes shoiid be edded for lotel xylene concentration Total Xylene MCL Is 10000 ugA
AortTables02 wtgt3
TableS Groundwater Chemistry Data Detected Anafytes LampRR Superfund Site ApHi 2002
MONITORING WELL MCL (2) MW-201
Oct 1996 Feb 1997 June 1997 Oct 1997 Feb 1998 June 1998 Oct 1998
TCL VOLATILES (ugL) Dichlorodrfluoromethane Chloromethane inyl Chloride Chloroethane Tnchlorofluoromethane 11 - Pichloroethene
5 U 5 U 5 U 5 U 5 U 5 U
1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U
1 U 1 U 1 u 1 U 1 U 1 u
1 u 1 u 1 U 1 u 1 u
2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U
1 UJ 1 u 1 U 1 u1 u
Acetone 5 U 5 UJ 5 U 2 UJ Methylene Chloride 5 U 2 UJ 2 U 1 U 2 U 2 U trans-12-Dichloroethene 100 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U 11 - Pichloroethene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U cis-12-Dichloroethene 70 5 U 1 U 1 u 1 U 2 U 1 u 2-Butancne 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 U 1 U Chloroform 111 - Tnchloroethane 200 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U 3enzene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 U 1 U 12 bull Dichloroethane 5 U 1 u 1 u 1 u 2 U 1 u Tnchloroethene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 U 1 U 12- Dichloropropane 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 U 1 u 4-Methyt-2-pentanone Toluene 1000 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 U 1 U Tetrachloroethene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 U 1 U Ch1oroben2ene 100 5 U 1 U 1 u 1 u 2 U 1 U Ethylbenzene 700 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 U 1 U mp Xylenes s u 1 u 1 u 1 u 2 U 1 U o-Xylene Jpound1 5 U 1 U 1 u 1 u 2 U 1 U Styrene 5 U 1 U 1 u 1 u 2 U 1 u isopropylbenzene 5 U 1 U 1 u 1 u 2 U 1 u Bromobenzene 5 U 1 U 1 u 1 u 2 U 1 u 123 Trichloropropane n-Propylbenzene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 U 1 U 2-Chlorototuene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 U 1 U 135-Tnmethylbenzene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 U 1 U Tert-butylbenzene 124-Tnmethylbenzene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U 13-Oichlorobenzene 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U p-lsopropyltoluene 5 U 1 U 1 u 1 u 2 U 1 u 14-Dichlorobenzene 75 5 U 1 U 1 u 1 u 2 U 1 u 12-diehlorobenzene 600 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U 124 Trichlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene 5 U 16 J 2 U 1 U 2 U 2 UJ 123 - Tnchlorobenzene 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 1 u 1 u
DISSOLVED TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 50 12 U 3 31 U 332 U 3 32 U 332 U 332 U Lead 15 10 U 141 U 142 U 1 42 U 142 U 142 U
TOTAL TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 50 12 U 3 31 U 3 32 U 3 32 U 3 32 U 3 32 U Iron 300(1) 353 511 332 J 100 324 221 Lead 15 10 U 141 U 1 42 U 142 U 142 U 142 U
INDICATOR PARAMETERS (mgL) Ammonia 004 U 0040 U 0 040 U 0040 U 0 040 U 05 UJ COD 100 u lt100 10 u lt10 lt10
BOD 20 U lt20 4 U J 2 UJ lt2 lt2 Chloride 600 J 20 lt2
Nates
(1) -Secondary standards araas naiad
(2) -Some Dnriong Wlaquoer ftegteMions and Heath Advisories Office of Water USEPA Docuwt MfiMr EPA 822-B-96-002 October 1996
(4)-Concentrations for raquoxytens andm bull xylenes should be added for total xylene eoncerdniion Total Xylene MCL Is 10000 ugA
Aptirrlaquobies02 laquo63
Table S Groundwater Chemistry Data Detected Anaiytes LampRR Superfund SiteApril 2002
MONITORING WEU MCL (2) MW-201
Mar 1999 Oct 1999 July 2000 Nov 2000 April 2001 October 2001 April 2002
TCL VOLATILES (ugLI Diehlorodifluoromethane 2 UJ 2 UJ 46 34 21J 23 hloromethane 1 UJ 1 U 05 U 05 U 0 5 UJ 05 U
Vinyl Chlonde 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Chloroethane 1 UJ 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Trichlorofluoromethane 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 014 J 012 J 11 - Dichloroethene 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Acetone R 12 UJ 12 UJ Methylene Chloride 2 U 2 U 1 UJ 1 UJ 052 UJ 1 U trans-12-Dichtoroethene 100 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 11 - Dichloroethane 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U cis-12-Oichloroethene 70 1 U 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 2-Butanone 1 U 1 U R 6 UJ -htoroform 05 U
111 -Trichloroethane 200 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Benzene 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 12-Dichloroethane 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Trichloroethene 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 U 12- Dichloropropana 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U l-Methyi-2-pentanone 5 U Toluene 1000 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 0 5 UJ 05 UJ Tetrachloroethene 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Chtorobenzene 100 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Ethylbenzene 700 1 U 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ mp Xylenes M 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 UJ 1 UJ 1 UJ o-Xylene (4) 1 U 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ Styrene 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ sopropylbenzene 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ Bromobenzene 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 123 Thchloropropane 05 U n-Propylbenzene 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 2-Chlorotoluene 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 135-Trimethylbenzene 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ Tert-butylbenzene 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 124-Tnmethylbenzene 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 0 5 UJ 05 UJ 13-Dtchlorobenzene 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 0 5 UJ p-lsopropyltoluene 1 U 5 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 14-Dichlorobenzene 75 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 12-dichlorobenzene 600 1 U 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 124 Tnchlorobenzene 0 5 UJ Hexachiorobutadiene Naphthalene 2 UJ 2 UJ 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 1 23 - Trichlorobenzene 1 UJ 1 UJ 05 U 05 U 0 5 UJ 05 UJ
DISSOLVED TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic Lead
50 15
108 UJ 0464 U
108 U 0 464 U
075 U 060 UJ
080 UJ 050 UJ
090 U 10 UJ
090 U 10 U
TOTAL TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 50 1 08 UJ 108 U 075 U 080 UJ 090 U 090 U
300(1) 395 1190 1530 335 196 J 420 bdquoead 15 0464 UJ 0 464 U 25 J 050 UJ 10 U 10 U
INDICATOR PARAMETERS (mgL) Ammonia 00970 00400 U 00400 U 0 20 U J 00400 U 00400 U COD lt10 lt5 5 U 100 U 100 u 30D lt2 lt2 2 UJ 20 U 20 U 20 U Chlonde lt2 300 U 3 00 U 203 229 217
Notes
(1) -Secondary standards areas noted
(2) -Smsee Orlrtdng Water RegutoUcns and Heath AtMscries Office of Water USEPA Document Number EPA 822-B-96-0Q2 October 1999
(4) -Concentrations for o-xylene and m p- xylenes shoitd be added for total xyleneconcentration Total Xylene MCL is 10000 ugL
AerUTaHesOZ wb3
Table S Groundwater Chemistry Data Detected Analytes LampRR Superfund Site April 2002
MONITORING WELL MCL (2) MW-202
Oct 1996 Feb 1997 June 1997 Oct 1997 Feb 1998 June 1998
TCL VOLATILES (ugL) Dichtorodrfluoromethane 5 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 2 U Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride
5 U 5 U
1 U 1 U
1 U 1 U
1 U 1 u
2 U 2 U
Chtoroethane 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 U Trichlorofluoromethane 11 - Dichloroethene
5 U 5 U
1 U 1 U
1 U 1 U
1 u 1 U
2 U 2 U
Acetone Methylene Chloride trarts-12-Dichloroethene 100
5 U 5 U 5 U
5 U J 2 UJ 1 U
5 U 2 U 1 U
1 U 1 u
2 U 2 U
11 - Dichloroethane cis-12-DicWofoethene 2-8utanone
70 5 U 5 U 5 U
1 U 1 U 1 U
1 U 1 U 1 U
1 u 1 U 1 U
2 U 2 U 2 U
Chloroform 111- Tnchloroethane Benzene 12 - Dichloroethane Trichloroethene 12- Dtchloropropane
200 5 U 5 U 5 U 5 U 5 U
1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U
1 u 1 u 1 u 1 U 1 U
1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u
2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U
4-Methyl-2-pentanone Toluene Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene mp Xylenes a-Xytene Styrene
1000
100 700 J4) ill
5 U 5 U 5 U 5 U 5 U 5 U 5 U
1 u 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U
1 u1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U
1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 U
2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U
Isopropylbenzene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U Bromobenzene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 123 Trichloropropane n-Propylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene 135-Tnmethylbenzene
S U 5 U 5 U
1 U 1 U 1 U
1 U 1 U 1 U
1 U 1 U 1 U
2 U 2 U 2 U
Tert-butylbenzene 124-Tnmethylbenzene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 U 13-Dichlorobenzene p-lsopropyltoluene 14-Dichlorobenzene 75
1 U 5 U 5 U
1 U 1 U 1 U
1 U 1 U 1 U
1 U 1 u 1 u
1 u 2 U 2 U
12-dichlorobenzene 600 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 U 124 Trichlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene 1 2 3 - Tnchlorobenzene
5 U 5 U
2 U J 1 U
2 U 1 u
1 U 1 u
2 U 2 U
DISSOLVED TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 50 1 2 U 3 31 U 332 U 332 U 332 U Lead 15 10 U 141 U 142 U 142 U 142 U
TOTAL TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 50 21 J 331 U 3 32 U 3 32 U 3 32 U Iron 300(1) 14900 7080 1940 1490 4310 Lead 15 96 114 295 212 J 297
INDICATOR PARAMETERS (mgL) Ammonia 004 U 0040 U 0040 U 0040 U 0040 U COD 100 U lt100 10 U lt10 10 U BOD 20 U lt20 2 U 2 UJ Chloride 250(1) 120 J 80 12
(1)-Secondary standard art a noted
ltZ)-Source OrWdng WaterRegttttonsand Healh Arfrfsorte OIBce of Water USEPA Document Matter EPA 822-B-BS-003 OctWer 1M6
(4) -Concentrations taro-xylene and m p - xylenes should blaquo added (or total xylene concerdratian TotalXylene MCL Is 10000 ugl
AprffTaMesOJ laquo03
Table 5 Groundwater Chemistry Data Detected Anatytes LampRR Superfund Site April 2002
MONITORING WELL MCL (2) MW-202
Oct 1998 Mar 1999 Oct 1999 July 2000 Nov 2000 April 2001 Oct 2001
TCL VOLATtLES (ugL) Dichlorodifluoromethane 2 U J 2 UJ 2 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 U Chloromethane 1 UJ 1 UJ 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 U Vinyl Chloride 1 u 1 u 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Chloroethane 1 U J 1 UJ 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Tnchtorofluoromethane 1 U J 1 u 1 UJ 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 11 bull Dichloroethene 1 U 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Acetone 2 UJ R 12 UJ 12 UJ Methylene Chloride 2 U J 2 U 2 U 1 U J 1 UJ 024 UJ 1 U trans-12-Dichloroelhene 100 1 U 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 11 bull Dichtoroethane 1 U 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U cis-12-Dichloroethene 70 1 U 1 u 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 2-Butanone 1 U 1 u 1 u 6 UJ Chloroform 022 J 05 U 1 1 1 bull Trichloroethane 200 1 U 1 u 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Benzene 1 U 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 12 bull Dichloroethane 1 U 1 u 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Tnchloroethene 1 U 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 U 1 2 bull Oichloroprppane 1 U 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 5 U Toluene 1000 1 U 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ Tetrachloroethene 1 UJ 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Chlorobenzene 100 1 U 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Ethylbenzene 700 1 U 1 u 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ mp Xylenes o-Xylene
M Jlt1
1 u 1 u
1 u 1 u
1 u 1 u
1 u 05 U
1 UJ 05 U
1 UJ 05 UJ
1 UJ 05 UJ
Styrene 1 U 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ Isopropylbenzene 1 U 1 U 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ Bromobenzene 1 U 1 u 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 123 Tnchloropropane 05 U n-Propylbenzene 1 UJ 1 U 1 UJ 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 2-Chlorotoluene 1 U 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 135-Tnmethylbenzene 1 U 1 U 1 UJ 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ Tert-butylbenzene 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 124-Tnmethvlbenzene 1 U 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 13-Oichoroben2ene 1 U 1 U 1 UJ 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ p-lsopropyltoluene 1 U 1 U 5 UJ 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 14-Oichlorobenzene 75 1 U 1 U 1 UJ 05 U 05 U 0 5 UJ 0 5 UJ 12-dichlorobenzene 600 1 U 1 u 1 UJ 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 124 Trlchlorobenzene 05 UJ Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene 1 U 2 UJ 2 UJ 05 U 05 U 0 5 UJ 0 5 UJ 1 2 3 - Trichlorobenzene 1 U 1 UJ 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ
DISSOLVED TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 50 180 U 108 U 120 U 075 U 080 U J 090 U 090 UJ Lead 15 0 464 U 0464 UJ 0464 U 062 J 050 U J 10 UJ 10 u
TOTAL TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 50 1 08 J 1 08 U 152 U 075 U 080 U J 090 UJ 090 U Iron 300(1) 3220 1610 2040 7790 1480 812 1790 Lead 15 196 U 0 910 J 127 06 UJ 077 J 10 u 10 u
INDICATOR PARAMETERS (mgL) Ammonia 030 0292 0 765 00400 U 020 U J 0-0400 U 0178 COD lt5 lt10 lt5_ 5 U lt5 10-0 U 100 U BOD lt2_ lt2_ 20 U 20 U 20 U 20 U Chloride J50Q 14 10 123 149 148 137 188
Notes
(1)-Secondary standards are as noted
(2) bull Source OrirMng Water Regulations end Heath Advisories Office of Water USEPA Oocunent Nunber EPA 622-B-96-002 October 1996
(4) -Concentrations lor o-xytene and m p bull xy4enes sholaquoAd be added for total xylene concentration Total Xylene MCL Is 10000 ugL
AprHTeMes02to3
Tables Groundwater Chemistry Data Detected Anatytes LampRR Supeifund Site April 2002
MONITORING WELL MCL (2) CW-5B
Oct 1996 Feb 1997 June 1997 Oct 1997 Feb 1998 June 1998 Oct 1998
TCL VOLATILES (ugLI Dichlorodifluoromethane 80 J 44 45 26 19 J 22 Chloromethane 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 UJ 1 U Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane
5 U 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u
7 J 2 UJ
Trichlorofiuoromethane 5 U 1 U 2 J 1 U 11 - Dichloroethene 5 U 06 J 08 J 1 U 2 UJ 1 U Acetone 8 J 5 U J 5 U 2 U J Methylene Chloride 5 U 19 J 1$ J 1 U 6 J 2 U Tans-12-Oichloroethene 100 5 U 1 U 08 J 1 U 2 UJ 1 U 11 - Oichloroethane 5 U 18 16 22 19 J 24 cis-12-Dichloroethene 70 5 U 1 U 2 UJ 1 U 2-Butanorve 5 U 1 U 1 u 1 u 2 U 1 U Chloroform 111 bull Tnchloroethane 200 3 J Benzene 5 U 1 u 1 u 1 u 2 UJ 1 U 12- Oichloroethane 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 UJ 1 U Trichlofoethene 5 U 11 14 10 J 14 12 bull Dichloropropane 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 UJ 1 U 4-Methyl-2-pentanone Toluene 1000 5 U 1 J 1 U 2 UJ 1 U Tetrachloroethene 18 25 28 40 26 J 36 Chlorobenzene 100 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 UJ 1 U Ethylbenzene 700 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 UJ 1 U mp Xylenes o-Xylene
M Jfl
5 U 5 U
06 J 1 U
08 J 1 U 1 u
2 UJ 2 UJ 1 U
Styrene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 UJ 1 U isopropylbenzene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 UJ 1 U Bromobenzene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 UJ 1 U 123 Tnchloroprppane n-Propylbenzene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 UJ 1 U 2-Chlofotoluene 5 U 1 U 1 u 1 u 2 UJ 1 U 135-Tnmethylbenzene S U 1 u 1 u 1 u 2 UJ 1 U Tert-butylbenzene 124-Tnmethylbenzene 5 U 1 UJ 1 u 1 u 2 UJ 1 U 13-Dichlorobenzene 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 U 1 U p-lsopropyltoluene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 UJ 1 U 14-Dichlorobenzene 75 5 U 1 U 1 u 1 u 2 UJ 1 U 12-dichlorobenzene 600 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 u 2 UJ 1 U 124 Trichlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene 5 U 2 U J 2 U 1 U 2 UJ 2 U J 123 - Trichlorobenzene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 UJ 1 U
DISSOLVED TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 50 1 20 U 3 31 U 3 32 U 3 32 U 3 32 U 332 U Lead 15 10 U 141 U 1 42 U 1 42 U 1 42 U 142 U
TOTAL TAL METALS (ugfL) Arsenic 50 120 U 331 U 3 32 U 332 U 3 32 U 332 U Iron 300(1) 233 521 620 1770 4790 4070 Lead 15 1 0 U 141 U 291 142 U 142 U 142 U
INDICATOR PARAMETERS (mgL) Ammonia 211 0 040 U 0040 U 0 052 0040 U 005 U J COD 100 U lt100 10 u lt10 10 u 13 BOD 20 U lt20 2 J 2 J 3 J Chloride 250(1) 300 30
Molts
(1)-Secondary standards art as notad
(Zt-Sowce DrinMng Water Reguhtlons andHeath Ad-tfsones Office of Water LiSEPA Doaxnerd Nisrber EPA 422-B-80-002 October 1990
(4) -Concentrations for o-xylene and m p bull xylenes should be added for total xylene concentration Total Xylene MCL Is 10000 ugfl
AprtlTables02 wb3
TableS Groundwater Chemistry Data Detected Analytes LftRft Superfund SiteApril 2002
Notes
(1) bull Secondary standards are as noted
(2) bull Source Drinking Water Regulations and Heath Advisories Office of Water USEPA Oocunent Nurber EPA 822-B-96-002 October 1996
(4) -Concentrations for o-xytene and m p bull xylenes should be added for total xylene concentration Total Xylene MCL rs 10000 uglL
AprflTabtes02wti3
Table S Groundwater Chemistry Data Detected Analytes LampRR Superfund Site April 2002
3NITORING WELL MCL (2) CW-7A
Oct 1996 Feb 1997 June 1997 Oct 1997 Feb 1998 June 1998 Oct 1998
TCL VOLATILES (ugL) Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane iinyl Chloride
5 U 5 U 5 U
1 U 1 U 1 U
1 U 1 U 1 U
2 U 1 u
09 J
2 U 2 U
2 U
2 U 1 UJ 1 U
Chloroethane 5 U 07 J 1 U 2 U 1 U Trichlorofluoromethane 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U 11 - Dichloroethene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U Acetone 5 U 5 U J 5 U 2 UJ Methylene Chloride 5 U 2 U J 2 U 1 U 2 U 2 U trans-12-Dichloroethene 100 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U 11 - Dichloroethane 5 U 08 J 09 J 2 U 1 U is-12-Dichloroethene 70 5 U 1 U 1 U 09 J 2 U 1 U 2-Butanone 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U Chloroform 1 1 1 - Trichloroethane 200 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U Benzene 5 U 1 J 12 - Dichloroethane 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U Trichloroethene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U 12- Dichloropropane 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U 4-Methyl-2-pentanone Toluene 1000 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U Tetrachloroethene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U Chlorobenzene 100 5 U Ethylben2ene 700 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U mp Xylenes o-Xylene
M(41 5 U 5 U
1 U 1 U
1 U 1 U
1 U 1 U
2 U 2 U
1 U 1 U
Styrene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U Isopropvlbenzene 5 U 1 U Bromobenzene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 123 Trichloropropane rt-Propylbenzene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U 2-Chlorotoluene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U 135-Trimethylbenzene 5 U 06 J 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U Tert-butvlbenzene 124-Trimethylbenzene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U 13-Dichlorobenzene 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U p-lsopropyltoluene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U 14-Dichlorobenzene 75 5 U 12-dichlorobenzene 600 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U 124 Trichlorobenzene Hexachtorobutadiene Naphthalene 5 U 2 UJ 2 J 1 U 2 UJ 1 2 3 - Trichlorobenzene 5 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 1 U
DISSOLVED TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 50 100 936 876 831 109 115 Lead 15 1 0 U 1 41 U 142 U 1 42 U 1 42 U 1 42 U
TOTAL TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic Iron
50 300(1)
100 25400
9 47 31500
839 3S900
898 36100
103 29200
119 31700
Lead 15 10 U 141 U 1 42 U 142 U 142 U
INDICATOR PARAMETERS (mgL) Ammonia 0 04 U 055 062 0 043 0 77 06 J ZOD 339 J 283 42 30 13 24 3QD 69 6 J 8 J Chloride 250(1)1 26 0 32 17 33 4 J 18
Note
(1) bull Secondary standards are as nofad
lt21 -Souce Printdng Water Regulations and HesHi Advisories Office of Water USEPA Document Number EPA 622-6-06-002 October 1096
(4) -Concentrations for o-xytene andm p - xylenes stmid be added for total xylene concertration Total Xylene MCL Is10000 ugL
AjgtrflTaWes02 wb3
Table S Groundwater Chemistry Data Detected Anatytes LampRR Superfund Site April 2002
MONITORING WELL MCL (2) CW-7A
Mar 1999 Oct 1999 July 2000 Nov 2000 April 2001 October 2001 April 2002
TCL VOLATILES (ugL) bullichiorodifluoromethane 2 UJ 2 UJ 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 U Chloromethane 1 UJ 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 U Vinyl Chloride 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Chloroethane 1 UJ 1 U 015 J 05 U 05 U 012 J Trichiorofluoromethane 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 11 - Dichtoroethene 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Acetone R R 12 UJ 12 UJ Methylene Chloride trans-12-Oichloroethene 1001
2 U 1 U
2 U 1 U
1 UJ 05 U
1 UJ 05 U
022 UJ 05 U
1 U 05 U
11 - Dichloroethane 1 U 1 U 035 J 0 31 J 05 U 0 24 J eis-12-Dichloroethene 70 1 U 1 u 012 J 05 U 05 U 05 U 2-Butanone 1 U 1 U R 6 UJ 18 J Chloroform 1 1 1 - Trichloroethane 2001 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U
05 U 05 U
Benzene 1 J 1 U 026 J 0 29 J 015 J 0 24 J 12 - Dichloroethane 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U Tnchloroethene 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 U 12- Dichloropropane 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 5 U Toluene 1000 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ
iTetrachloroethene Chtorobenzene 1001
1 U 1 U 05 U 075
05 U 0 78
05 U 024 J
05 U 061
Ethylbenzene 7001 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 0 5 UJ mp Xylenes m 1 U 1 U 1 u 1 UJ 1 UJ 1 UJ o-Xylene m 1 u 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 0 5 UJ Styrene 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 0 5 UJ Isopropylbenzene 1 U 1 U 024 J 0 28 J 05 UJ 0 24 J Bromobenzene 1 U 1 u 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 123 Tnchloropropane 05 U n-Propylbenzene 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 U 2-Chlorotoluene 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 0 5 UJ 135-Trimethylbenzene 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 0 5 UJ Tert-butylbenzene 05 U 05 UJ 0 5 UJ 124-Tnmethvlbenzene 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 0 5 UJ 13-CSchlorobenzene 1 U 1 U 05 U 05 U 031 J 0 5 UJ p-lsopropyltoluene 1 U 5 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 05 U 14-Dichlorobenzene 75 1 U 20 083 086 028 J 058 J 12-dichlorobenzene 600 1 U 1 u 05 U 05 U 0 5 UJ 0 5 UJ 124 Tnchlorobenzene 05 UJ Hexachtorobutadiene Naphthalene 2 UJ 39 J 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ 1 2 3 - Tnchlorobenzene 1 UJ 1 UJ 05 U 05 U 05 UJ 05 UJ
DISSOLVED TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 50 9 51 J 937 91 90 70 J 64 Lead 15 0 464 U 0464 U 30 U J 050 U J 10 U 10 u
TOTAL TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 50 103 J 898 94 85 77 107 J Iron 300(11 24900 18000 15200 14700 11900 9830 Lead 15 0464 UJ 0464 U 30 UJ 0 50 U J 10 u 1 0 u
INDICATOR PARAMETERS (mgL) Ammonia 0 934 0681 0260 021 0-227 0271 COD 14 5 U lt5 110 10 0 U BOD 26 J 20 U 20 U 40 Chloride 250(1) 12 112 705 590 492 700
Notes
(1)-Secondary standards are as noted
(2) -Source- DnnHng Water Regulations and Heath Adwsones Office ot Water USEPA Documert Nixnber EPA 622-B-96-002 October 199
(4) -Concentrations for o-tylene and m p - xylenes should be added for Iota xylene concentration Total Xylene MCL Is 10000 ugL
AprilTebles02wb3
TABLE 6 GROUNDWATER CHEMISTRY SPLIT SAMPLE COMPARISONS
LampRR SUPERFUND SITE April 2002
MONITORING WELL MW-104A MW bull 104A RPO WELL SPLIT
YfiL VoUWLESlu57CT Severn Trent Lab ^Comjiuchern
Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromelhane Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane 33 29 129 Trichlorofluoromethane 11 - Dichloroethene Acetone 50 UJ 16 UJ Methylene Chloride trans-12-Dichloroethene 11 - Dlchloroethane 130 110
00 167
22-Dichloropropana cts-12-Diehloroethene 2-Butanone 50 Bromochloromethane Chloroform 111-Tnchloroethane 11-Dichloropropene Carbon tetrachloride Benzene 28 25 113 12 bull Dlchloroethane 00 Trichloroethene UJ 1 2- Dich loropropane Dibromomethane Bromodlchloromethane 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 13 Toluene 00 112-Trichloroethane Tetrachloroethene 06 13-PiclHoropropane Oibromochloromethane 12-Dibromoethane (EDB) Chlorobenzene 12 13 8 0 1112-Tetrachloroethane Ethylben2ene mp- Xylenes
100110
110110
95 00
o- Xylene 46 52 1 2 2
Stvrene Bromoform Isopropylbenzene 13 22 51 4 Bromobenzene 05 1122-Tetrachloroethane 123 - Trichloropropane n-Propylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene UJ 135-Tnmethylbenzene 43 17 867 4-Chiorotoluene tert-Butvlbenzene 14 124-Tnmethvlbenzene 28 43 423 sec-Butylbenzene 13-Dlchlorobenzene p-lsopropyltoluene 10
14-Dichlorobenzene 37 42 127 n-Butylbenzene 12-dichlorobenzene 00 12-Dibromo-3-chloropropane UJ
|1 2 4 - Tnchlorobenzene UJ Hexachlorobutadiene UJ
iNaphthalene 42 65 430 123-Tnchlorobenzene
DISSOLVED TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 620 98 448 Lead 10 11
TOTAL TAL METALS (ugL) Arsenic 1100 97 131 iron 65800 61400 69 Lead 1 8 1 2
INDICATOR PARAMETERS ltmgL)
Ammonia 23 24 9 79 COD 94 9 189 663 BOD 400 1265 Chloride 270 294 85
Nate
(1)gtComparabily analysis performed accosting to Dm Samplngand Analysis Plan LSRR Suparfurtd Site prepared by da maidmis Inc September 1696
TABLE 7 AMBIENT AIR SAMPLING DATA LampRR SUPERFUND SITE JUNE 5 AND JUNE 6 2002
Sampling Location Start date Start time (1) Canister start vacuum (Field) End date End time (2) Canister end vacuum (Field)
TO -14 Compounds
Dichlorodifiouromethane Chloromethane 12-Dichlorotetraflouroethane Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane Chloromethane Trichloroflouromethane 11-Dichloroethene Methylene Chloride 112-Trichlorotriflouroethane 11-Dichloroethane cis-12-Dichloroethene Chloroform 12-Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane Benzene Carbon tetrachloride 12-Dichloropropane Trichloroethene cis-13-Dichloropropene trans-13-Dichloropropene 112-Trichloroethane Toluene 12-Dibromoethane Tetrachtoroethene Chlorobenzene Ethyl Benzene m p - xlylene o-Xylene Styrene
1122-Tetrachloroethane 135-Trimethylbenzene 4-Ethyltoluene 124-Trimethvlbenzene 13-Dichlorobenzene Benzyl chloride 14-Dichlorobenzene 12-Dichlorobenzene 124-Trichlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Notes
- Parts per billion by volume
AS -1 Downwind 5 June 02 1002
30 Hg 6 June 02
802 10 Hg
066 068 05 05 05 05
05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 0 5 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05
05 05 05 U 05 U
AS -2 Downwind 5 June 02
1008 2995 Hq 6 June 02
808 16 Hq
073 072 05 05 05 05
05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 06 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05
05 05
05 05 05 05 05 05 U 05 U
AS -3 Upwind
5 June 02 1012
2995 Hq 6 June 02
812 20 Hq
11 076 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05
068
05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05
05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 U 05 U
AS -4 Upwind
5 June 02 1016
3005 M Hg
6 June 02 816
22 Hg
083 082 08 08 08
08 08 08
08 08 08 08 08
08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08
08 08 08 08
08 08 08
08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 U 08 U
AS -1DUPLICATE Downwind 5 June 02
1002 30 Ha
6 June 02 802
115 Hg
075 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05
05 05 05 05 05 05
05 05 05 05 U
(1) - Start time weather information- GOS degrees F SW wind Wind speed 15-25 mph Barometric pressure 30 03 inches Relative Humidity 59
(2) bull End time weather information Conditions not reported in analytical package
TABLE 8 FLAREINLET SAMPLING DATA LampRR SUPERFUND SITE
Sampling Location Flare Inlet
Start date June 5 2002
End date June 5 2002
TO bull14 Compounds Detected ppbv
Propene 2650 Dichlorodiflouromethane 270 Vynyl Chloride 1050
Acetone 4540
Ethanol 19200 Methylene Chloride 425 11-D8chloroethane 275 Isopropyl Alcohol 3660 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 4000 cis-12-Dichloroethene 625 Ethyl Acetate 635 Tetrahydrofuran 940 Benzene 360 Cyclohexane 690
Trichloroethene 210 Heptane 555
Toluene 22900
Tetrachloroethene 240 Ethyl Benzene 3000 mp-Xylenes 5800 Styrene 380 o-Xylene 3000 4-Ethyltoluene 136 124-Trimethylbenzene 150
Environmental Operations and Maintenance Management
Figures
igtM shy
PAPER
1ESpoundNG
GAS WELL
GAS PR08E
v--cia GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
a POST-CLOSURE GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
A +-3 SURFACE WATER SAMPLING LOCATION
A raquogt-bull AMBIENT AIR MONITORING LOCATION
NQJamp 1) TOPOGRAPHIC DATA LOCATIONS ANO PROPERTY
BOUNDARIES SURVEYED BY SANSON SURVEYINGAND ENGINEERING COMPANY NCVEMKR 1884SEPTEMBER 1895 ANO SEPTEMBER 189B
2 ftcmM - Feat abova maan sao lavaL
dPPWPBiMTr LOCUTIONWETLAND OajHtATTON
SCMpound
200 200 400 FEET
SAMPLE LOCATION PLAN
LampRR SUPERFUND SITE NORTH SMITHFIELD RHODE ISLAND
PREPARED FOR
THE LampRR GROUP
O ampMInc iwl w^ AttlBwODOB AUBIJBDQBI OATE 1-25-00 DRAWING NAMEFIGURE 1 SAMWX LOCATION POM
I
O 81 M Inc Environmental Operations and
Maintenance Management
Appendix A
Inspection Reports
LtfiHll - 3 3 5 - 7
de maximis inc
LANDFILL amp RESOURCE RECOVERY SUPERFUND SITE FIELD GAS WELL MONITORING DATA SHEET
Date ^-pound3- copyL By hAUifi shy
Weather Conditions Temp Barometric Pressure ^bull
System Conditions b-voD Control Temp (ncanV FlameJemp (TISHIOI) Flow (cfm)
Well Time CH4 co2 02 Temp Pressure Comments No JL (aF) (in HQ)
1 (0Ai 11 I ALA SLA LA -n i 33 X All Ho -tsr ALA ALL to 3 - t 3 r
33L1 i o - i o -o ALL -13 1
LAI LLC AJ2 1deg -1 3 S
jLk 121 ILL rltgt -o X Wt-ti gXort-d)
3Htgt ^1 i t e
SLA OO JLo 11 C L O
JpoundLpound_ a _lt2A 10 -76 11 Jpound_L Ai So - 3- ^
12 1AA ampV7 OSL So
13 M r ) zor Oti lb I t I
14 JLX rLL it-iCvr- At- Lzt c
15 id 03 -amp1 16 o
17 un 3 3 r a XiL -7P cmE -gt
18 oA JLl Probe
1 nJ IZJ
OO LA jgr _oj_ XLl iU_
0 - 3 - o K JiLA Ffaare 3 o g J g i OA
Blower n a 3-r
LABlaquoFiraquoiaSo WiHMontioring 0raquotraquoSW1
TABLE 2-1 LampRR SUPERFUND SITE
INSPECTION LOG
Inspector Name David Fuerst Date 42302 Time On Site 830 AM Weather Cloudy Signature
Feature Trouble Signs Status Problem Description of Action Date Location Problem
1 Security System Good Condition a Gate Inoperative b Fence Holes c Locks Inoperative d Signs Mining Unreadable 2 Cover Integrity a Surface Features b Slopes
Animal Burrows Other Holes Cracks Washouts and Sloughing
Good Condition Several animal burrows found
Filled burrows
50702
c Vegetation BrushesTree Growth Bare Spots d Breakouts Washouts and Discoloration 3 Stormwater Management Syrian Good Condition a Diversion Swales b Catch Basins c Stilling Wells d Perimeter Channels e Culverts f Detention Basins
Ponding Water Filling and Sediment Filling with Sediment Blocked by Debris Filling with Sediment Filling with Sediment Riprap T inmg Disturbed Blocked Damaged Riprap Outlets Disturbed Filling with Sediment Riprap Outlets Disturbed
4 Groundwater Monitoring WeOs Good Condition a Locking Cap b Protective Casing c Concrete Collar d Local Erosion
Broken No Lock Cracked Missing Cracked Missing Ponding Water Channels
51andfill Gas Monitoring and Good Condition R-14andR-17 Sampling valve Fixed Valves 50702 Collection System Air leak fittings were a LFG Extraction Wells Physical Damage to Casing Wellhead Sampling Port b LFG Migration Probes Physical Damage to Casing c Control Panel Recording Paper and Pens Empty A Ppnnanwrf MwwmMitti Good Condition a Bench Maries TiltingHeaving b Settlement Monuments TiltingHeaving COMMENTS
i raquobullide maxima me
LANDFILL amp RESOURCE RECOVERY SUPERFUND SITE
FIELD GAS WELL MONITORING DATA SHEET
Z By 0 i i t t i i bullDate
Cj Barometric PressureWeather Conditions CL jlsiY Temp
System Conditions Ltgtplusmn0 Control Temp fneaoiV ZampflH Flame Temp (tismkraquo) ^J~ Flow (cfm) (
Well Time CH4 CO O Temp Pressure Comments
No () () () lto_ (In H0)
1 4 t O 0JL o
00 JO T - l
ngt i pa ka raquor
211 Oji H ~ l i L
0 O bull+kn US 47h
JLO jssl XI (i gtSto
H t r M o -pound - xr
XU1 OiJ ill rp MLL g (
JpoundJt_ J2A O C pound6 - l-t
10 ltbull4 0 - ( j 15= -X S
11 J1 JL2 - r - i
12 iui MX Oi
13 lilnl OJ) 1o poundgt
14 o-tt o f illSI - 44 C Ifrjfrg amp T- 7
15 ilX iSd_ ol 11 HM o
16 J1X Oo - lt-p
17 3ML t 18 bull3 (5 Ju XL Xa-g
Probe
1 00 Oo 563shy
Oj or 11-5
bullare
Blower
LiMfTC(Uf O
jraquonraquon nn2oncn9At fill CT VST A U1T1J frriAfl gtAo of A vv4
de maximis inc
LANDFILL amp RESOURCE RECOVERY SUPERFUND SITE FIELD GAS WELL MONITORING DATA SHEET
Date 53002 __ Bv Peter O Davis
Weather Conditions partly cloudy temp 77 F Barometric Pressure 30
System Conditions good Control Temp 1606 flame temp 1603 flow rcfmv 455
Well No
Time CH4 CCh 02 Temp (F)
Pressure (h2O)
Comments
1
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Probe
1246 1241 1235 1230 1225 1221 1217 1210 1206 1200 1155 1300 1141 1146 1150 1258 1255 1133
1309
489 525 324 389 215 023 476 02 252 426 348 265 430 001 425 503 493 417
02
394 393 285 299 208 128 359 00
252 321 290 256 345 002 317 323 369 319
00
02 00 00 00
35 131 05 194 03 04 02 00 00 192 01 01 02 01
194
86 82 104 95 72 76 100 80 90 88 86 100 80 82 84 80 98 88
-610
-620
-900 -980 -900 -400 -900 -520
-1090 -980 -900 -930 -440 -730 -690 -620 -620 -810
Well closed
Well closed
Well closed
1313 01 00 195
Flare
Blower 1318 1322
354 340
286 295
03 08
+340 1550
Inspector Nnme Peler O Davis Dale 31002 Weallier partly cloud
Feature
1 Security Systems L Gate b Fence c Lock i Signs
2 Cover Integrity a Sulfate Features b Stapes e Vegetation d Breakouts
X Stosm Hater Management System Diversion Swales Catch Basins Stilting Wells Perimeter Channels Culverli Detention Bisks
4 Ground Water Monitoring Wells a Locking Cap b Protective Casing c Conoete Collar d Local Erosion
5Landfill Gas Monitoring and Collection System a LFO Extraction Welts b LFG Migration Probst c Control Panel
6 Permanent Monuments a bench Murks b Se-nkntent Monuments
ou
N
1MU S13PERFUND SITE INSPECTION LOG
Corrective Measures Trouble Signs
Inoperative Holes Inoperative Mini eg Unreadable
Animal Burrows Oilier Holes Cmcka Washouts and Sloughing BrustvTree Growth BsreSpoU Washouts and Discoloration
Ponding Water Filling with Sediment Filling With Sediment Blocked by Debris Tilling With Sediment Filing With Sediment Kip Rap Distorted Blocked Damaged Rip Rap Disturbed Filling Witit Sediment Rip Rep Disturbed
O
ltn w
laquo -j OB
OB OB
^
de maximis inc
LANDFILL amp RESOURCE RECOVERY SUPERFUND SITE FIELD GAS WELL MONITORING DATA SHEET
Date July 2 2002 Bv Peter O Davis
Weather Conditions Clear Hot Humid temp 84 F Barometric Pressure 2994
System Conditions Good Control Temp 1626 flame temp 1646 flow rcfin) 452
Well Time CH4 CO2 O2 Temp Pressure Comments No (F) (H2O)
1 910 461 395 01 88 -940 915 486 400 01 90 -930 920 315 308 01 104 -1180 925 370 318 01 96 -1260 930 229 246 16 80 -1190 940 022 103 134 70 -120 Well shut off 945 451 361 05 100 -1160
950 00 00 190 80 -790 Well shut off 956 249 268 04 92 -1280
10 1002 422 333 02 88 -1100 11 1025 322 294 04 88 -1140 12 1030 234 268 00 98 -1100 13 1050 391 351 00 84 -1290 14 1035 00 01 185 84 -1010 Well shut off 15 845 419 338 01 86 -1000 16 905 447 354 11 74 -960 17 855 480 374 01 96 -920 18 1045 375 319 01 90 -1150
Probe
1 1120 00 42 147
1125 00 32 154
1105 00 07 177 Flare 1130 338 306 02 +190
Blower 1135 330 283 07 -1760
TABLE 2-1 LampRR SUPERFUND SITE
INSPECTION LOG
Inspector Name Peter Davis Date July 2 2002 Time On Site 830AM Weather Sunny Hot Humid Signature Peter O Davis
Feature
1 Security System a Gate b Fence c Locks d Signs 2 Cover Integrity a Surface Features b Slopes c Vegetation d Breakouts 3 Stormwater Management System a Diversion Swales b Catch Basins c Stilling Wells d Perimeter Channels e Culverts f Detention Basins
4 Groundwater Monitoring WeOs a Locking Cap b Protective Casing c Concrete Collar d Local Erosion
5 land fill Gas Monitoring and Collection System a LFG Extraction Wells b LFG Migration Probes c Control Panel 6 Permanent Monuments a Bench Marks b Settlement Monuments
LampRR Landfill Inspection
mmmmmmeasures Trouble Signs
Inoperative Holes Inoperative Missing Unreadable
Animal Burrows Other Holes Cracks Washouts and Sloughing BrushesTree Growth Bare Spots Washouts and Discoloration
Pending Wats Filling and Sediment Filling with Sediment Blocked by Debris Filling with Sediment Filling with Sediment Riprap Fining Disturbed Blocked Damaged Riprap Outlets Disturbed Filling with Sediment Riprap Outlets Disturbed
Broken No Lock Cracked Missing Cracked Missing Ponding Water Channels
Physical Damage to Casing Wellhead Sampling Port Physical Damage to Casing Recording Paper and Pens Empty
TiltingHeaving Tilting Heaving
Status Problem Description of Action Date Location Problem
Good Condition
Good Condition Side of landfill near flare
Animal burrow Filled June 27 02
Good Condition
Good Condition
Good Condition
Good Condition
COMMENTS Filled two potholes ha perimeter road and three potholes in crest road
demaximis inc
LANDFILL amp RESOURCE RECOVERY SUPERFUND SITE FIELD GAS WELL MONITORING DATA SHEET
Date 8102 Bv David Fuerst Peter Davis
Weather Conditions sunnv clear temp 80 F Barometric Pressure 2972
System Conditions OK Control Temp 1657 F flame terno 1654 F flow (dm 433
Well Time CH4 CO2 O2 Temp Pressure Comments 0 ro 0No (F) (H2O)
r 900 456 396 00 96 bull1010 915 473 401 02 94 -105 930 315 301 00 108 -1310 940 348 328 02 98 -1430 950 175 194 52 84 -1320 1005 25 99 127 74 -70 Closed 1015 448 372 03 98 -1340 1030 00 00 188 74 -970 Closed 1040 242 262 05 90 -1480
10 1050 411 339 04 86 -1350 a 1100 316 298 04 74 -1370 12 1105 238 280 01 96 -130 Water Slues 13 1115 404 353 01 90 -139 14 1120 00 01 196 74 -1240 Closed 15 1130 416 329 00 90 -1140 16 1135 449 349 06 90 -1260 17 1140 467 371 00 100 -1020 18 1145 374 321 03 88 -1340
Probe
850 00 21 174
855 00 23 170
1200 00 03 180 Flare 1215 337 306 03 +130
Blower 1220 310 296 10 -1870
TABLE 2-1 LampRR SUPERFUND SITE
INSPECTION LOG
Inspector Name Dave Fiigrct Peter Davis Date August 12002 Time On Site 830AM Weather Sunny Hot Humid temp 85F Signature Dave Fuerst Peter O Davis
Feature
1 Security System a Gate b Fence c Locks d Signs 2 Caver Integrity a Surface Features b Slopa c Vegetation d Breakouts
3 Stonnwaler Management System a Diversion Swales b Caleb Basins c Stilling Wells d Perimeter Channels e Culverts pound Detention Basins
4 Groundwater Monitoring WeQs a Locking Cap b Protective Casing c Concrete Collar d Local Erosion
amp Landfill Gas Monitoring and Collection System a LFG Extraction Wells hLFG Migration Probes c Control Panel 6 Permanent Monuments a Bendi Marks b Settlement Monuments
LampRR Landfill Inspection
Trouble Signs
Inoperative Holes Imperative
Animal Burrows Other Holes Cracks Washouts and Slou ting BrushesTree Growth Bare Spots Washouts and Discoloration
Ponding Water Filling and Sediment Filling witb Sediment Blocked by Debris Filling with Sediment Filling with Snrimwnt Riprap Lining Disturbed Blocked Damaged Riprap Outlets Disturbed Filling with Sediment Riprap Outlets Disturbed
Broken No Lock Cracked Missing Cracked MissingPnmjingJraquoi|laquofriwinilaquoigtk
Physical Damage to Casing Wellhead Sampling Port Physical Damage to Casing Recording Paper and Pens Empty
Tihrngtieaving TiltingHeaving
Problem Location
Description of Problem
Action Date
Good Condition
Good Condition East side of landfill
Animal burrow Filled burrow-will
80102
monitor for further activity
Good Condition
Good Condition
Good Condition
Good Condition
COMMENTS Roads on landfillarc becoming overgrown with weeds and the landfillcover needs cuttingn raquo mdash i raquo i mdash bull raquo w n i m t t t n a f n r A m n a tjOOl
demaximis inc
LANDFILL amp RESOURCE RECOVERY SUPERFUND SITE FIELD GAS WELL MONITORING DATA SHEET
Date 82902 Bv David Fuerst Peter Davis
Weather Conditions Rain temp 60 F Barometric Pressure
System Conditions Good Control Temp1605 F flame temo 1717 F flow fcfaD 437
Well Time CH4 CO2 O2 Temp Pressure Comments No (F) (H2O)
T 750 590 442 00 70 -22 800 611 433 00 86 -20 815 453 359 00 104 -46 820 464 353 00 96 -54 830 392 325 00 56 -45 840 41 136 130 66 -01 closed 850 587 413 05 94 -46 900 08 10 200 52 -11 closed 910 335 308 05 90 -62
10 920 556 398 00 82 -39 11 925 413 334 01 80 -45 12 935 333 317 03 90 -43 13 940 539 397 08 92 -61
14 950 00 01 151 66 -410 closed 15 1000 562 377 03 86 -30 16 1015 551 381 07 56 -20
17 1030 607 412 01 90 -20
18 1040 498 372 03 84 -45 Probe
1 730 00 53 150
740 00 37 165
Flare 1100 440 343 00 +58 Blower 1110 422 328 03 -124
TABLE 2-1 LampRR SUPERFUND SITE
INSPECTION LOG Inspector Name David Fuerst amp Peter Davis Date August 29 2002 Time On Site 730 AM Weather Rain 60 F Signature
Feature
1 Secnrity System a Gate b Fence c Locks d Signs 2 Cover Integrity a Surface Features b Slopes c Vegetation d Ikeakouts 3 Stormvrater Management System a Diversion Swales b Catch Rafting c Stilling Wells d Perimeter Channels e Culverts f Detention Basins
4 Groundwater Monitoring Wells a Locking Cap b Protective Casing c Concrete Collar d Local Erosion
5 Landfill Gas Monitoring and Collection System a LFG Extraction Wells b LFG Migration Probes c Control Panel 6 Permanent Monuments a Bench Marks b Settlement Monuments COMMENTS
CORRECTIVE MEASURES Trouble Signs Status Problem
Location Description of
Problem Action Date
Inoperative Holes Inoperative Missing Unreadable
Good
Animal Burrows Other Holes Cracks Washouts and Sloughing BrushesTree Growth Bare Spots Washouts and Discoloration
Good
Ponding Water Filling and Sediment Filling with Sediment Blocked by Debris Filling with Sediment Filling with Sediment Riprap Iining Disturbed Blocked Damaged Riprap Outlets Disturbed Filling with Sdinent Riprap Outlets Disturbed
Good
Broken No Lock Cracked Missing Cracked Missing Ponding Water Channels
Good
Physical Damage to Casing Wellhead Sampling Port Physical Damage to Casing Recording Paper and Pens Empty
Good
TiltingHeaving Tilting Heaving
Good
Weeds on the roads and swales were treated by TRUGREEN Chemlawn on August 212002
OampMInc Environmental Operations and
Maintenance Management
Appendix B
Groundwater and Surface Water Data Validation Reports
Severn Trent Laboratories
356 FARRAGUT CROSSING ORrRILLIUM INC KNOXVILLE TN 37922
Consultants in Environmental Chemistry [423] 966-8880
FAX [423] 966-8885 ceriksontrilliuminccam
June 202002
Mr Dave Fuerst OampM Inc 540 Hopmeadow Street Simsbury CT 06070
RE Data Package Review Report - STL Report No 200943 - VOCs in Water
Dear Mr Fuerst
I have completed my evaluation ofthe volatile organics analysisdata prepared by the Severn Trent Laboratory (STL) in Shelton Connecticut for three water samples and one trip blank (TB) from the LampRR Site which were reported in a single data package under Report No 200943 The data package was received by Trillium for review on May 162002 with corrected documentation received on June 202002 The following samples were reported
MW-103A-042302 MW-201-042302 MW-202-042302 Trip Blank
Analyses wereperformed accordingto EPAMethod 8260B(SW-846 Third EditionUpdate m) my evaluation was based onthe specifications ofthe project-specific Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP 996) the referenced method and the Region I EPA-New England Data Validation Functional Guidelinesfor Evaluating EnvironmentalAnalyses (1296) Qualifiers consistent with those defined in the Region I document were applied as necessary and appropriate
As specified in Section 92 of the QAPP (page 23) a Level III evaluation limited to an overview of the information provided on the summary forms was performed No raw data were included in the data package
HOME OFFICE 28 GRACES DRIVE bull COATESVILLE PA19320 bull (610)383-7233 bull FAX (610) 383-7907
OFFICES IN LOUISIANA bull MARYLAND bull NEW JERSEY bull NORTH CAROLINA bull PENNSYLVANIA bull TENNESSEE bull TEXAS
fTRILLIUMHc
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Report No 200943 (Volatiles in Water) June 202002 Page 2
Based on the evaluation the following qualifiers were applied
bull The result for acetone in Trip Blank was qualified as less than the sample-specific reporting limit based on associated method blank contaminationand as estimated due to an unacceptably high percent relative standard deviation in the associated initial calibration and an unacceptably low relative response factor in the associated continuing calibration (5 UJ)
bull Resultsfor l23-trichlorobenzeneinMW-103A-042302andMW-201-042302 were qualified as estimated based on an unacceptably high percent relative standard deviation intheassociated initial calibrationand aslessthan thereported values based on associated method blank contamination (UJ)
Results for acetone in MW-103A-042302 MW-201-042302 and MW-202-042302 were rejected (R) due to an unacceptably low relative response factor in the associated continuing calibration These results warranted qualification as estimated due to a high percent relative standard deviation in the associated initial calibration but the R qualifier takes precedence
bull Results fordichlorodifluoromethane inall samples werequalified as estimated (J UJ) based on an unacceptably high percent difference value in the associated continuing calibration standard
All B qualifiers applied by the laboratory were removed by the evaluator J qualifiers applied by the laboratory to sample results that are less than the sample-specific RL were not removed
Both method detection limits (MDLs) and reporting limits (RLs) are documented on the Laboratory Test Results form for each sample Based on professional judgment the evaluator recommends that thedata userconsider only the RLsastheless thanvaluesassociated withall non-detected target analyte results
All qualifiers are reflected on the Laboratory Test Results forms included in Attachment A to this report Region I qualifier definitions are also provided in this attachment
At thediscretionofthe data user thefollowing point maywarrant considerationby laboratory personnel prior to future sampling efforts
^^TRILLIUM
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Report No 200943 (Volatiles in Water) June 202002 Page 3
bull Use of linear (orhigher order) regressionsfor calibration of target analytes for which the RSD from initial calibrationexceeds 15 inaccordance with the requirements of the referenced method
Details regarding the review and evaluation of these data are discussed below
Holding Times Preservation SampleIntegrity A copy of the applicable chain of custody (COC) record was included in the data package documenting a sample collection date of42302 Physical preservation ofthe samples withice was not recorded by the sampler but an acceptable temperature (24degC) on laboratoiy receipt was documented on the COC
Acidification ofthe samplesfor volatiles analysis with hydrochloric acid wasrecorded by the sampler on the COC Documentation of sample pHs was included in the laboratorys narrative which indicated that all of the water samples were at pH 10-13
AH volatiles analyses were performed on 42402 which is well withinthe required 14-day technical holding time specified for chemically preserved water samples
GCMS Instrument Performance Check Summary forms (Form V) were included for two bromofluorobenzene (BFB) instrument performance checks on instrument MSL reflecting each 12-hour period during which samples associated standards and associated quality control samples were analyzed Relative abundances for both performance checks were acceptable
CalibrationSummary results (FormVI) fora single initial calibration(IC) performed on instrument MSL (41702) were reported in support of the sample analyses Results for five standards were reported at concentrations of 05 2 10 20 and 30 pgL for all target analytes establishing a calibration range of 05 pgL to 30 pgL There was no indication on die summary forms that any target analytes were included in the standards at higher concentrations Because the ketones were present at higher concentrationsthan theother targetanalytes inthe ICsdocumented in previousdata packages preparedinsupport of this project the laboratorywas asked toclarify theICconcentrations applicable to this data set In response the laboratoiy explained that they changed their IC procedures in January 2002 so that the ketones are at the same concentration as the other target analytes in the IC standards No further action was taken by the evaluator
Reported averagerelative responsefactors(RRFs) wereacceptable(greater than005) forallrelevant target analytes in this IC
Percent relative standard deviations(RSDs) exceeded the method-specified maximum acceptance criterion of 15 for the following target analytes
^frRILLIUMtrade
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Report No 200943 (Volatiles in Water ) June 202002 Page 4
Analyte RSD
acetone 613
2-butanone 163
2-chlorotoluene 158
naphthalene 159
123-trichlorobenzene 185
No evidence that linear (or higher order) regressions were performed was provided in the data package No positive results were reported for 2-butanone 2-chlorotoluene or naphthalene in the site samples and the RSDs for these compounds did not exceed the less restrictive validation criterion of 30therefore no actionwas taken withrespect to the results for these analytes Results for acetone in all samples were qualified as estimated (J UJ) due to the unacceptably high (gt30) RSD value Results for 123-trichlorobenzene in MW-103A-042302 and MW-201-042302 were qualified as estimated (J) basedon thehigh RSDThis target analytewas not detectedin any ofthe other site samples and the RSD did not exceed 30 therefore no additional action was taken by the evaluator
Form VII was provided for a single continuing calibration (CC) standard run on 42402 at 0802 RRFs were acceptable(greater than 005) except for acetone(0049) in this CCResults for acetone in MW-103A-042302 MW-201-042302andMW-202-042302 were rejected (R) and the result for acetone in Trip Blank was qualified as estimated (J) due to this unacceptably low RRF
Reported percent differences (Ds) from the IC were less than the method-specified acceptance criterion (20) in each of the CCs with the exceptions of dichlorodifluoromethane (280) and acetone (279) Results for acetone were previously qualified based on an unacceptably low RRF in the CC standard no additional action was warranted based on the high D value
Resultsfor dichlorodifluoromethaneinall samples werequalified asestimated (JUJ) because theD in the CC exceeded the less restrictive validation criterion (25) as well as the method-specified criterion
Blanks Results for a single method blank (MB) associated with the site sample analyses were provided in the data package Acetone (155 pgL) and 123-trichlorobenzene (032 pgL) were detected in this MB The result for acetone in Trip Blank and results for 123-trichlorobenzene in
TRILLIUM
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Report No 200943 (Volatiles in Water ) June 202002 Page 5
MW-103A-042302 and MW-201-042302 were qualified as less than the sample-specific reporting limit (RL) or less than the reported value whichever was greater based on the associated MB contamination (U) No positive results were reported for acetone or 123-trichlorobenzene in any oftheremaining sitesamplestherefore nofurther actionwasnecessary withrespect tothese analytes on this basis
The qualified sample result for acetone was less than ten times the concentration found in the associated MB and the qualified results for 123-trichlorobenzene were less than five times the concentration found in the MB All B qualifiers applied by the laboratory were removed by the validator
One trip blank (Trip Blank) was submitted with this data set After qualifications based on MB contamination no target analytes were reported in the trip blank
Surrogates Reported recoveries(FormII) were withinthe analyte-specificacceptance limits found on the summary form for all site samples and quality control (QC) analyses
MatrixSpikeMatrixSpikeDuplicate (MSMSD) NoMSMSD analyseswere reported inthisdata package
Blank Spikes One blank spike (identified as LCS and QCS by the laboratory in the data package) was runon thedate that samples wereanalyzed A summary form documenting recoveries of the 27spiked analytes included in this spiked analysis (each at 10 pgL) was provided in the data package
Percent recoveries of the 27 analytes listed on the summary form were within the analyte-specific acceptance limits found on the summary form in all cases
Field Duplicate No field duplicates were included in this data set
InternalStandardResponses Internal standard (IS)areasand retentiontimes(RTs) werereported on Form Vm for all site samples reported in this data set and the related quality control analyses All IS areas and RTs were within the acceptance limits as reported on the summary form
Sample Results Results for the site water samples and the TB were reported on Laboratory Test Results forms According to the narrative a purge volume of 25 mL was used for all analyses
Analysis run logs were not provided in the data package and results from a single analysis of each sample were reported No dilutions were required for any of the samples in this data set
frRILLIUMHC
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Report No 200943 (Volatiles in Water) June 202002 Pace 6
Both method detectionlimits (MDLs)and RLs aredocumented on the LaboratoryTest Results form for each sample All RLs reported by the laboratory are equivalent to or above the lowest concentration IC standard associated with these analyses Documentation supporting theMDLs was not included in the data package and no evidence that standards or quality control samples were analyzed at these concentrations in association with thisset of site samples was provided in the data package Therefore based on professional judgment the evaluator recommends that the data user consider onlythe RLsasthelessthanvalues associatedwith all non-detectedtarget analyte results
Reported positive sample results that wereless than theRL but greater than the MDL were qualified as J by the laboratory These qualifiers were not removed by the evaluator
The laboratory also applied B qualifiers to results for target analytes that were detected in the associated MBwhether or notthe targetanalyte wasdetected inthe sampleBqualifiersare usually applied only to positive sample results for target analytes that werealso detected in theMB All B qualifiers applied by the laboratory were removed by the evaluator
DocumentationA COC record provided inthe data package included allreported samples and was properly completed except that no shipment information was recorded Both the courier name and the applicable airbill number should be recorded on all COCs
On Form VI and Form VII (initial and continuing calibration summaries) the dates of the first and last initial calibrationstandards run were recordedas12702 and41702 Basedon information provided by the laboratory the entry of 12702 in this space was in error all initial calibration standards associated with this data set were analyzed on 41702 Corrected summary forms were received from the laboratory via USPS on 61902 and were inserted into the data package by the evaluator replacing the originally-provided pages
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this data package review report
Sincerely
Ootidsfukampfymdash
Carol A Erikson Quality Assessment Manager
CAEdas 95406April 2002Voa2
^triujum
ATTACHMENT A
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS STLConnecticut Report No 200943
EPA Region IQualifierDefinitions
U - The material wasanalyzed for but was not detected The associated numerical value is the samplequantitation limit Thesamplequantitation limit accounts for sample-specificdilution factorsand percent solidscorrectionsorsamplesizes that deviate from those required by the method
J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity
R - The data are unusable (analyte may or may not be present) Resampling and reanatysis is necessary for verification The R replaces the numerical value or sample quantitation limit
UJ - The analyte was analyzed for but was not detected The sample quantitation limit is an estimated quantity
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Hunter 200943 Date05152002
CUSTOMERS0poundllKkr PROJECT LmtAHampMLL ATTN DAVID fUERST
Customer Sample ID MM03A-042302 Laboratory Sample ID 200943-1 Date Sampled 04232002 Date Received 04242002 Time Sampled 1100 Time Received 1003 Sample Matrix Uater
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLEAESULT Pt6S- Rt DILUTION WITS BATCH DT -DATETIME
82608 Volatile 0r9anic8 Oichlorodifluoromethane 01 05 100000 UBL 4911 042402 1355 Chlorcraethene cfitgt 02 05 100000 uaL 4911 042402 1355 Vinyl chloride | |ov 01 0S 100000 ugL 4911 042402 13554
Kj Brooomethane 02 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 Chloroethane 04 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 TrichIorofluoranethane 02 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 11-Dichloroethene 02 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 Acetone 1 5 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 Methylene chloride taigt 03 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 trens-12-Dichloroethene 02 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 11-Dichloroethane 01 004 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 22-DiehIoropropane 03 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 cia-12-Dichloroethene 002 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 2-Butanone ltMEK) 03 5 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 Bromochloremethane 02 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 Chloroform 003 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 111-Trichloroethane 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 11-Dichloropropene 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 Carbon tetrachloride 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355
Benzene 004 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 12-Dichloroethane 004 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 Trichloroethene 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 12-Dichloropropane 005 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355
Dibrooomethane 04 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 Bromodichloromethane 004 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 Toluene 004 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 112-Trichloroethane 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355
In Description deg Dry Ugt Page 2
Job Number 200943
CUSTOMER0amp Ht JSC
Customer Sample ID HW-103A-042302 Date Sampled 04232002 Time Sampled 1100 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION
Tetrachloroethene 13-Dichloropropane Di bromochloromethane 12-Dibromoethane(EDB) Chlorobenzene 1112-Tetrachloroethane Ethylbenzene mampp-Xylenes o-Xylene Styrene Bromoform Isopropylbenzene Bromobenzene 1122-Tetrachloroethane 123-Trichloropropane n-Propylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene 135-Trimethylbenzene 4-Chlorotoluene tert-Butylbenzene 124-Trimethylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene 13-Dichlorobenzene p-Isopropyltoluene 14-Dichlorobertzene n-Butylbenzene 12-Dichlorobenzene 12-D1brcaio-3-chloropropane 1Z4-Tr1chlorobenzene
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S
PROJECTVLRRLANOFILL
Laboratory Sample ID 200943-1 Date Received 04242002 Time Received 1005
SAMPLE BES8LTshy FUSS Mampt it
ND 01 05 ND 01 05 ND 01 05 ND 01 05 ND 003 05 ND 002 05 ND 01 05 ND 01 1 ND 01 05 ND 004 05 ND 01 05 ND 01 05 ND 003 05 ND 01 05 ND 01 05 ND 01 05 ND 01 05 ND 01 05 NO 01 05 ND 01 05 ND 01 05 ND 01 05 ND 004 05 ND 01 05 ND 002 05 ND 01 05 ND 004 05 ND 02 05 ND 004 05
Paoa 3
DILUTION
100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 lflOOOO 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000
Date05152002
ATTN DAVID FUERST
UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
ugL 49 042402 1355 pem ugL 49 042402 1355 pam ugL 49 042402 1355 pam ugL 49 042402 1355 pam ugL 49 042402 1355 pam
ugL 49 042402 1355 pam ugL 042402 1355 pam ugL 042402 1355 pam ugL 042402 1355 pam ugL 042402 1355 pam
ugL 042402 1355 pam ugL 042402 1355 pam ugL 042402 1355 pam
ugL 042402 1355 pam ugL 042402 1355 pam ugL 042402 1355 pam ugL 042402 1355 pam ugL 042402 1355 pam ugL 042402 1355 pam ugL 042402 1355 pam
ugL 042402 1355 pam
ugL 042402 1355 pam ugL 042402 1355 pam ugL 042402 1355 pam ugL 042402 1355 pam
ugL 042402 1355 pam
ugL 042402 1355 pam ugL 042402 1355 pam
ugL 042402 1355 pan
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 200943 Date05152002
CUSTOMER O amp M INC PROJECT 1MtiAKDFJU ATTN DAVID fUESST
Customer Sample ID NU-103A-042302 Laboratory Sample ID 200943-1 Date Sampled 04232002 Date Received 04242002 Time Sampled 1100 Time Received 1005 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHCO PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS Rt DILUTION UNITS BATCH or DATETIME TECH
KexachIorobutadiene 08 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1355 pam Naphthalene 123-Trichlorobenzerte
NO 2 lAJ
oae I 9
Il3j0
04 004
05 05
100000 100000
ugL ugL
4911 4911
042402 1355 042402 1355
pam pam
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 4
Job Number 200943
CUSTOMER0 A NIRC
Customer Sample ID MW-201-042302 Date Sampled 04232002 Time Sampled 1100 Sample Matrix Water
PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTIONTEST MBTHCO
B2608 Volatile Organics DictilorodifIuororoethane Chllt -((ethane Vinyl chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane TrichlorofIuorccnethane 11-Dichloroethene Acetone Methylene chloride trans-12-Dichloroethene 11-Dichloroethane 22-Dichloropropane cis-12-Dichloroethene 2-Butanone(MEN) BromochIorcmethane Chloroform 1f11-Trfchloroethane 11-Dichloropropene Carbon tetrachloride Benzene 12-Dichloroethane Trichloroethene 12-Dichloropropane Dibromomethane Bromodichloromethane 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) Toluene 112-Trichloroethane
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S
PROJECT L RR LANDFILL
Laboratory Sample ID 200943-2 Date Received 04242002 Time Received 1005
SAMPLERESULT FLAGS kbl RL
3 cr T 01 05
MD 02 05 ND 01 05 NO 02 05
ND 04 05 ND 02 05
ND 02 05
Wshy -Bshy 1 5
ND 03 05 ND 02 05 ND 004 05
ND 03 05
ND 002 05
ND 03 5
ND 02 05 ND 003 05 ND 01 05 ND 01 05 ND 01 05 ND 004 05 ND 004 05 ND 01 05 ND 005 05 ND 04 05 ND 004 05
ND 01 05 ND 004 05 ND 01 05
DILUTION
100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 101000 100000 100000 100000 100000
Date05152002
ATTN DAVID FUKST
UNITS BATCH OT OATETIME TECH
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam ugL 042402 1429 pam ugL 042402 1429 pam ugL 042402 pam1429 ugL 042402 1429 pam ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 149 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
Page 5 In Description = Dry Ugt
Job Nmtoer 200943
CUSTOMER OampMINC
Customer Sample ID KU-201-042302 Date Sampled 04232002 Time Sampled 1100 Sample Matrix Water
PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTIONTEST METHC0
Tetrachloroethene 13-Dichloropropane DibromochIoromethane 12-Dibroraoethane(EDB) Chlorobenzene 1112-TetrachIoroethane Ethylbenzene mampp-Xylenes o-Xylerte Styrene Bromoform Isopropylbenzene Brcmobenzene 1122-Tetrachloroethane 123-Trichloropropane n-Propylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene 135-Trimethylbenzene 4-Chlorotoluene tert-Butylbenzene 124-Trimethylbenzene 8ec-Butylbenzene 13-Dichlorobenzene p-Isopropyltoluene 14-Dichtorobenzene n-Butylbenzene 12-Dichlorobenzene 12-D1brooo-3-chloropropBne 12 4-Trichlorobenzene
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S
PROJECT t RR LANDFILL
Laboratory Sanple ID 200943-2 Date Received 04242002 Time Received 1005
SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS mi Rl DILUTION
ND 01 05 100000 ND 01 05 100000 ND 01 05 100000 ND 01 05 100000 ND 003 OS 100000 ND 002 05 100000 ND 01 05 100000 ND 01 1 100000 ND 01 05 100000
m 004 05 100000 ND 01 05 100000 ND 01 05 100000 ND 003 05 100000 ND 01 05 100000 ND 01 05 100000 ND 01 05 100000 ND 01 05 100000 ND 01 05 100000
ND 01 05 100000 ND 01 05 100000 NO 01 05 100000
ND 01 05 100000 ND 004 05 100000 ND 01 05 100000 ND 002 05 100000 ND 01 05 100000 ND 004 05 100000 ND 02 05 100000 ND 004 05 100000
Date05152002
ATTNbull DAVID FUERST
UNITS BATCH OT DATETIME TECH
ugL 49 042402 1429 para ugL 49 042402 1429 para ugL 49 042402 1429 para ugL 49 042402 1429 pam ugL 49 042402 1429 para ugL 49 042402 1429 para ugL 49 042402 1429 pam ugL 49 042402 1429 pam ugL 49 042402 1429 pam
ugL 49 042402 1429 para ugL 491 042402 1429 pan igL 49 042402 1429 pam ugL 49 042402 1429 pan ugL 49 042402 1429 pam
ugL 49 042402 1429 pam 042402 1429 pamugL 49
ugL 49 042402 1429 para
ugL 042402 1429 pam 042402 1429 pamugL
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam 042402 1429 pamlpoundL
ugL 042402 1429 pam ugL 042402 1429 pam ugL 042402 1429 pam
ugL 042402 1429 pam
Page 6 In Description = Dry Ugt
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nutter 200943 Date05152002
CUSTONES0amplaquoc INC PROJECT L RK LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Senple ID MW-201-042302 Laboratory Sample ID 200943-2 Date Sampled 04232002 Date Received 04242002 Time Sampled 1100 Time Received 1005 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOO PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS mi RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH OT DATETIME TECH
Kexachlorobutadlene 02 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1429 pam Naphthalene ND 04 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1429 pern 123-Trlehlorobenzene 07 UJ f 004 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1429 pam
In Description = Dry Ugt Page 7
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nunber 200943 Date05152002
CUSTOMER0ft NIMC PROJECTS L RR UNWELL ATTN DAVID fUERST
Customer Sample ID MU-202-042302 Laboratory Sample ID 200943-3 Date Sampled 04232002 Date Received 04242002 Time Sampled 1100 Time Received 1005 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT- FLAGS rot RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME
8260B Volatile Organics DichIorodifluoromethane ND uX i( deg-1 05 100000 ugL 042402 15034911 Chloromethane ND 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1503W deg-2Vinyl chloride ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1503 Bromomethane ND 02 05 1000L0 ugL 4911 042402 1503 Chloroethane ND 04 05 ugL100000 4911 042402 1503
VjO Trichlorofluoromethane ND 02 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1503 11-Dichloroethene ND 02N 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1503 Acetone NB- 1 5 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1503 Methylene chloride ND 03 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1503 trans-12-Dichloroethene ND 02 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1503 11-Dichloroethane ND 004 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1503iA22-DichIoropropane ND 03 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1503 cis-12-Dichloroethene ND 002 100000 ugL 4911 150305 0424022-Butanone(KEK) ND 03 5 100000 ugL 4911 1503042402Bromochloromethane ND 02 10000005 ugL 4911 042402 1503 Chloroform ND 003 10000005 ugL 4911 042402 1503 111-Trichloroethane ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1503 11-Dichloropropene NO 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1503 Carbon tetrachloride ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1503 Benzene ND 004 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1503 12-Dichloroethane ND 004 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1503 Trichloroethene ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1503 12-DichIoropropane ND 005 05 ugL 042402100000 4911 1503 01bromomethane ND 04 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1503 Bromodichloromethane ND 004 10000005 ugL 4911 042402 1503 4-Hethyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1503 Toluene ND 004 05 ugL100000 4911 042402 1503 112-Trichloroethane ND 01 05 100000 1503ugL 4911 042402
In Description laquo Dry Ugt Page 8
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Kunber 200943 Date0S152002
CUSTOMER0ampN INC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTHi DAVID FUERST
Customer Sanple ID HU-202-042302 Date Sampled 04232002 Time Sampled 1100 Sample Matrix Water
Laboratory Saqple ID 200943-3 Date Received 04242002 Time Received 1005
TEST KETROO PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION sample Result FLAGS HDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME
TetraehIoroethene 13-Dichloroproparie DibrooochIorcmethane 12-Dibronoethane(EDS) Chlorobenzene 1112-Tetrachloroethene Ethylbenzene mampp-Xylenes o-Xylene Styrene Bromoform Isopropylbenzene Brooobenzene 1122-Tetrachloroethane 123-Trichloropropane n-Propylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene 135-Trimethylbenzene 4-Chlorotoluene tert-Butylbenzene 124-TrimethyIbenzene sec-Butylbenzene 13-Dichlorobenzene p-18opropyltoluene 14-Dichlorobenzene n-Butylbenzene 12-Dichlorobenzene 12-Dibronraquo-3-chloropropane 124-Trichlorobenzene
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NO ND
01 01 01 01 003 002 01 01 01 004 01 01 003 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 004 01 002 01 004 02 004
05 05 05 05 05 05 05 1 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05
100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000
ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL
4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911 4911
042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402
1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503
In Description laquo Dry Wgt Page 9
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nunfeer 200943 Date(3152002
CUSTOMER0amp KIRC PROJECT L RRUWDFJiL ATTN OAVIO FUERST
Customer Sample ID MU-202-042302 Laboratory Sample ID 2009433 Date Sampled 04232002 Date Received 04242002 Time Saopled 1100 Time Received 1005 Sanple Matrix Water
TEST METHOO PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS MDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
Hexaehlorobutadlene 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1503 pam
Naphthalene 123-Trichlorobenzene
w 04 004
05 05
100000 100000
ugL ugL
4911 4911
042402 1503 042402 1503
pam pam
J
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 10
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nutber 200943 Date05152002
CUSTOMER0amp N INC PROJECT L Rft LANDFILL ATTN OAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID TRIP BLANK Laboratory Sample ID 200943-4 Date Sanpled 04232002 Date Received 04242002 Time Sampled 0000 Time Received 1005 Sample Matrix Water
TE$t METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS MDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME
8260B Volatile Organies Dichlorodifluoromethane ND U 3a 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 Chloromethane ND 02 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 Vinyl chloride ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 Brcmomethane ND 02 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537
V3j Chloroethane ND 04 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 02 05 100000 ilaquoL 4911 042402 1537 11-Dichloroethene ND 02 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 Acetone 5 W CT 2- 1 5 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 Methylene chloride 03 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 trans-12-DichIoroethene ND L l 02 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 11-Dichloroethane ND 004 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 22-DichIoropropane ND 03 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 eis-12-DichIoroethene ND 002 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 2-Butanone(MEK) ND 03 5 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 Bromochloromethane ND 02 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 Chloroform ND 003 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 111-Trichloroethane ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 11-Dichloropropene ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 Carbon tetrachloride ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 Benzene ND 004 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 12Dichloroethane ND 004 05 100000 4911ugL 042402 1537 Trichloroethene ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 12-DichIoropropane ND 005 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 Dibromomethane ND 04 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 Bromodichloromethane NO 004 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537 Toluene ND 004 05 1UOOOO ugL 4911 042402 1537 112-Trichloroethane ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4911 042402 1537
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 11
Job Nixnber 200943
CUSTOMERS 0ampHreg
Customer Sample ID TRIP BLANK Date Sampled 04232002 Time Sampled 0000 Sample Matrix Water
PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTIONTEST METHOD
Tetraehloroethene 13-DIchIoropropane Dibromochloromethane 12-Dibromoethane(EDB) Chloroben2ene 1112-Tetrachloroeth8ne Ethylbenzene mampp-Xylenes o-Xylene Styrene Bromofono Isopropylbenzene Bromobenzene 1122-TetrachIoroethane 123-Trichloropropane n-Propylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene 135-Trimethylbenzene 4-Chlorotoluene tert-Butylbenzene 12j4-Tr1methylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene 13-Dichlorobenzene p-Isopropyltoluene 14-Dtchlorobenzene n-Butylbenzene 12-Dichlorobenzene 12-Dlbromo-3-chloropropane 124-Trichlorobenzene
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S
PROJECTS L R8 LANDFILL
Laboratory Sanple ID 200943-4 Date Received 04242002 Time Received 1005
SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS regL RL
ND 01 05 ND 01 05 ND 01 05 ND 01 05 ND 003 05 ND 002 05 ND 01 05 ND 01 1 ND 01 05
ND 004 05
ND 01 05
ND 01 05
ND 003 05 ND 01 05 ND 01 05
ND 01 05
ND 01 05
ND 01 05 ND 01 05 ND 01 05
ND 01 05
ND 01 05
ND 004 05
ND 01 05 ND 002 05 ND 01 05 ND 004 05 ND 02 05
ND 004 05
DILUTION
100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000
Date05152002
ATTN DAVID FUERST
UNITS BATCH OT DATETIME TECH
ugL 49 042402 1537 pam
ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL
49 49 49 49
042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402
1537 1537 1537 1537 1537 1537 1537 1537 1537 1537
pam pam pam pam pam pam pern pam pam pam
ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL
042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402 042402
1537 1537 1537 1537 1537 1537 1537 1537 1537 1537 1537 1537 1537 1537 1537 1537 1537 1537
pam pam pam pam pam pam pam pam pam pam pam pam pam pam pam pam pam pam
Page 12 In Description Dry Mgt
V
jyRB
Job Nuitoer 200943
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Date05152002
CUSTOMER 0 MIKC PROJECTS L RR LANftHU ATTN DAVIO FUERST
Customer Sample ID TRIP BLANK Date Sampled 04232002 Time Sampled 0000 Sample Matrix Water
Laboratory Sample ID 2009434 Date Received 04242002 Time Received 1005
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION
Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene 123-Trichlorobenzene
SAMPLERESULT FLAGS
We M
MDL
01 04 004
Rl
05 05 05
DILUT10M
100000 100C00 100000
UNITS
ugL ilaquoL ugL
BATCH
4911 4911 4911
DT DATETIME TECH
042402 1537 042402 1537 042402 1537
pam pain pam
Jo
Page 13 In De^criotion = Dry Wat
TRILLIUMinc 356 FARRAGliT CROSSING DR
Consultants in Environmental Chemistry KNOXVILLE TN 37922 (423) 966-8880
FAX (423) 966-8885 ceriksontrilliuminccom
June 20 2002
Mr Dave Fuerst OampM Inc 540 Hopmeadow Street Simsbury CT 06070
RE Data Package Review Report - STL Report No 200950 - VOCs in Water
Dear Mr Fuerst
I have completed my evaluation of thevolatile organicsanalysis data prepared by theSevern Trent Laboratory (STL)in SbeltonConnecticut for 12 water samplesand one trip blank(TB) from the LampRR Site which were reported in a single data package under Report No 200950 The data package was received by Trillium for review on May 16 2002 with corrected documentation received on June 19 2002 The following samples were reported
MW-CW-5B-4-23-02 MW-102A-4-23-02 MW-104A-4-23-02 MW-CW-7A-4-23-02 MW-DUP1-04-23-02 Trip Blank-4-23-02 LCH-4-042302 SW-10-042302 SW-8-042302 LCH-3-042302 SW-16-042302 SW-5-042302 SW-DUP-042302
Sample identifications are listed above exactly as they are found on the chain of custody records Sample identificationson theLaboratory TestResultsformswerecorrected bytheevaluator as necessary to accurately reflect the chain of custody identifications
Analyses wereperformed accordingto EPAMethod 8260B(SW-846 Third EditionUpdate m) my evaluationwas based on thespecifications of the project-specific Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP 996) the referenced method and the Region I EPA-New England Data Validation Functional Guidelinesfor EvaluatingEnvironmental Analyses (1296) Qualifiers consistent with those defined in the Region I document were applied as necessary and appropriate
HOME OFFICE 28 GRACES DRIVE bull COATESVILLE PA19320 bull (610)383-7233 bull FAX (610) 383-7907
OFFICES IN LOUISIANA bull MARYLAND bull NEW JERSEY bull NORTH CAROLINA bull PENNSYLVANIA bull TENNESSEE bull TEXAS
^TRILLIUNLc
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Report No 200950 (Volatiles in Water ) June 202002 Page 2 of 9
As specified in Section 92 of the QAPP (page 23) a Level III evaluation limited to an overview of the information provided on the summary forms was performed No raw data were included in the data package
Based on the evaluation the following qualifiers were applied
bull Resultsfor acetoneinall sampleswere qualifiedasestimated dueto unacceptably low relative responsefactors in allassociated calibrationstandardsas wellasunacceptably high recoveries in the associated blank spike analyses and as less than the reported value or less than the sample-specific reporting limit (RL) whichever was greater based on the associated method blank contamination (UJ)
bull Results for 2-butanone in SW-10-042302 and for 13-dichlorobenzene in LCH-4shy042302 were qualified as estimated (J) based on unacceptably high percent relative standard deviation values in the associated initial calibration
bull Resultsfor 2-chlorotolueneand naphthalene inMW-104A-4-23-02 MW-CW-7A-4shy23-02 MW-CW-5B-4-23-02 MW-102A-4-23-02 MW-DUP1-04-23-02 Trip BIank-4-23-02 LCH-4-042302 and SW-10-042302 were qualified as estimated (J UJ) based on unacceptably high percent differences in the associated continuing calibration standards
bull Results for 124-trichlorobenzene hexachlorobutadiene naphthalene and 123shytrichlorobenzene inSW-8-042302 LCH-3-042302 SW-16-042302SW-5-042302 and SW-DUP-042302 were qualified as estimated (UJ) based on unacceptably high percent differences in the associated continuing calibration standards
bull The result for methylene chloride in MW-DUP1-4-23-02 was qualified as less than the sample-specific RL (10 U) due to lack of confirmation at a low concentration in the field duplicate analysis
All B M and Hqualifiers applied by the laboratory were removed by the evaluator J qualifiers applied by the laboratory to sample results that are less than the sample-specific RL were not removed
Both method detection limits (MDLs) and RLs are documented on the Laboratory Test Results form for each sample Based on professional judgment the evaluator recommends that the data user consider only the RLs as the less than values associated with all non-detected target analyte results
^ TRILLIUM
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Report No 200950 (Volatiles in Water) June 202002 Page 3 of 9
All qualifiers are reflected on the Laboratory Test Results forms included in Attachment A to this report Region I qualifier definitions are also provided in this attachment
At thediscretionof thedata userthe followingpoint may warrantconsideration bylaboratory personnel prior to future sampling efforts
bull Use oflinear (or higher order) regressionsfor calibration of target analytesfor which the RSD from initial calibrationexceeds 15 inaccordance with the requirements of the referenced method
Details regarding the review and evaluation of these data are discussed below
Holding Times Preservation Sample Integrity Copies of the two applicable chain of custody (COC) records were included in the data package documenting sample collection dates of 42402 and 42502 Physical preservation of the samples with ice was recorded by the sampler and acceptable temperatures (46degC and 39degC) on laboratory receipt were documented on both COCs
Acidification of the samples for volatiles analysis with hydrochloric acid was also recorded by the sampler on both COCs Documentation of acceptable (pH lt02) sample pHs was included in the laboratorys narrative which indicated that all of the water samples were at pH 10-13
All volatiles analyses were performed on 42602 and 42902 Bothof these datesare within the 14shyday technical holding time specified for chemically preserved water samples
GCMS Instrument Performance Check Summary forms (Form V) were included for three bromofluorobenzene (BFB) instrument performance checks on instrument MSL reflecting each 12-hour period during which samples associated standards and associated quality control samples were analyzed Relative abundances for all three performance checks were acceptable
CalibrationSummaryresults (FormVI) for asingle initial calibration(IC) performed oninstrument MSL (42502) were reported in support of the sample analyses Results for five standards were reported at concentrations of 05 2 10 20 and 30 pgL for all target analytes establishing a calibration range of 05 pgL to 30 pgL There was no indication on the summary forms that any target analytes were included in the standards at higher concentrations Because the ketones were present at higher concentrationsthan theother target analytesin theICsdocumented in previousdata packages prepared insupport ofthisproject thelaboratory wasasked to clarify theIC concentrations applicable to this data set In response the laboratory explained that they changed their IC procedures in January 2002 so that the ketones are at the same concentration as the other target analytes in the IC standards No further action was taken by the evaluator
TRILLIUM
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Report No 200950 (Volatiles in Water) June 202002 Page 4 of 9
For all relevant target analytes reported average relative response factors (RRFs) were acceptable (greater than 005) except for acetone (0036) Results for acetone in all samples were qualified as estimated (J) due to the unacceptably low average RRF
Percent relative standard deviations (RSDs)exceeded the method-specified maximum acceptance criterion of 15 for the following target analytes
Analyte RSD
acetone 321
2-butanone 165
4-methyl-2-pentanone 155
2-chlorotoluene 184
n-propylbenzene 174
13-dichlorobenzene 178
hexachlorobutadiene 175
No evidence that linear (or higher order) regressions were performed was provided in the data package No positive results were reported for 4-methyl-2-pentanone 2-chlorotoluene nshypropylbenzene or hexachlorobutadiene in the site samplesand the RSDs for these compounds did not exceed the lessrestrictive validationcriterion of30 thereforeno action wastaken with respect to the results for these analytes Results for acetone were previously qualified based on the low average RRF and no additional action was necessary due to the high RSD value Results for 2shybutanone in SW-10-042302 and for 13-dichlorobenzene in LCH-4-042302 were qualified as estimated (J) based on the high RSDs These two target analytes were not detected in any of the other site samples and the RSDs did not exceed 30 therefore no additional action was taken by the evaluator
Form VII was provided for each of two continuing calibration (CC) standards run on 42602 at 0731 and 42902 at 0734 Reported RRFs were acceptable (greater than 005) exceptfor acetone (0032 and 0030) in both CCs All sample results for acetone were previously qualified based on similar responses in the associated 1C and no additional action was taken based on the CC results
^TRILLIUNLc
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Report No 200950 (Volatiles in Water) June 202002 Page 5 of 9
Reported percent differences (Ds) from the IC were less than the method-specified acceptance criterion (20) in each of the CCs with the following exceptions
Analyte D D 42602 42902
bromomethane 217
2-chlorotoluene 264
124-trichlorobenzene 213 295
hexachlorobutadiene 236 309
naphthalene 276 454
123-trichlorobenzene 591
No positiveresults werereported forbromomethane124-trichlorobenzeneor hexachlorobutadiene in the samplesanalyzed on 42602and these Dvalues did not exceed theless restrictivevalidation criterion (25) therefore no sample results for these compounds were qualified on this basis
Resultsfor2-chlorotolueneand naphthaleneinthesamplesanalyzed on42602(MW-104A-4-23-02 MW-CW-7A-4-23-02 MW-CW-5B-4-23-02 MW-102A-4-23-02 MW-DUP1-04-23-02 Trip Blank-4-23-02 LCH-4-042302 and SW-10-042302) and for 124-trichlorobenzene hexachlorobutadiene naphthalene and 123-trichlorobenzene in the samples analyzed on 42902 (SW-8-042302 LCH-3-042302 SW-16-042302 SW-5-042302 and SW-DUP-042302) were qualified as estimated (J UJ) because the Ds in the associated CC standards exceeded 25
Blanks Results for two method blanks (MBs) associated with the site sample analyses were provided in the data package Acetone (186 pgL) hexachlorobutadiene (017 pgL) and 123shytrichlorobenzene (033 pgL) weredetected in 4968-1 (42602)and acetone(206 pgL) methylene chloride (041 pgL) 2-butanone (078 pgL) and hexachlorobutadiene (012 pgL) were detected in 4991-1 (42902) Results for acetone in all site samples were qualified as less than the reported value or less than the sample-specific reporting limit (RL) whichever was greater based on the associated MB contamination (U) No positive results were reported in any of the site samples for the remaining analytes detected in the MBs therefore no further action was necessary
frRILLIUNLc
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Report No 200950 (Volatiles in Water) June 202002 Page 6 of 9
The qualified sample results for acetone were less than ten times the concentration found in the associated MB All comparisons were made based on sample results prior to adjustment for the applicable dilutionfactor AllBqualifiersapplied by thelaboratory wereremoved by theevahiator
One trip blank (Trip Blank-04-23-02) wassubmitted with this dataset After qualifications based on MB contamination no target analytes were reported in the trip blank
Surrogates Reported recoveries (FormII) were withinthe analyte-specific acceptance limitsfound on the summary form for all site samples and quality control (QC) analyses
MatrixSpikeMatrixSpikeDuplicate(MSMSD)Sample MW-CW-5B-4-23-02was preparedand analyzed as anMSMSD pair in associationwith thisdata setPercent recoveries for 27 spiked target analytes were reported on summary forms in the data package Recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) between paired recoveries were within the analyte-specific acceptance limits as found on the summary forms with the exception of chloromethane (104 QC 26-96) and bromomethane (119 QC 41-109) in the MSD analysis Neither of these analytes was detected in the unspiked sample and the unacceptable recoveries were too high suggesting the potential for reporting false positives or a high bias to detected concentrations Therefore no qualifiers were applied on this basis
Blank Spikes One blank spike (identified as LCS andor QCS by the laboratory in the data package) wasrun on eachdate that samples wereanalyzed Summary formsdocumenting recoveries of 27 spiked analytes included in these spikes (each at10 pgL) were provided in the data package
Percent recoveries of the 27 analytes listed on the summary forms were within the analyte-specific acceptance limits found on the summary forms except for chloromethane (106 QC 26-96) bromomethane (121 QC 41-109) and acetone (274 QC 0-262) in the blank spike run on 42602 Although it was within the documented acceptance limits the recovery for acetone in the blank spike run on 42902 (228) was also considered unacceptably high based on professional judgment Acetone wasdetected in all ofthe sitesamples inthis data setresultsfor thistarget analyte were qualifiedasestimated (J)based onthe unacceptablyhigh blankspike recoveriesBromomethane and chloromethane were not detected in anyof thesite samplesand the unacceptable recoverieswere too high suggesting the potential for reporting false positives or a high bias to detected concentrations Therefore no additional qualifiers were applied based on the blank spike results
FieldDuplicate Sample MW-DUP1-04-23-02 was identified as afield duplicate of MW-102A-4shy23-02 based on information provided by the client Both samples wererun at 20-fokldilutions After qualifications based on blank contamination positive paired results for dichlorodifluoromethane (10
TRILLIUMtrade
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Report No 200950 (Volatiles in Water ) June 20 2002 Page 7 of 9
RPD) vinyl chloride (16 RPD) chloroethane (24 RPD) trans-12-dichloroethene (0 RPD) 11shydichloroethane (6 RPD) cis-12-dichloroethene (13 RPD) 12-dichloroethane (20 RPD) trichloroethene (12 RPD) tetrachloroethene (15 RPD) chlorobenzene (0 RPD) and isopropylbenzene (29 RPD) showed acceptable reproducibility Methylene chloride(8 pgL) wasreported ata lowconcentration in MW-DUP1-4-23-02 but was not found in MW-102A-4-23-02 (10 U) Since the positive result is less than the applicable sample-specific RL the result for methylene chloride in MW-DUP1-4-23-02 was qualified as less than the sample-specific RL (10 U) due to this lack of confirmation
Sample SW-DUP-042302 was identified as a field duplicate of SW-5-042302 based on information provided by the client Both samples were run undiluted After qualifications based on field and laboratory blank contamination no target analytes were reported in either sample Therefore no quantitative evaluation of precision could be made using these data
InternalStandardResponses Internalstandard (IS) areasand retention times(RTs) were reported on Form VTTT for all site samples reported in this data set and the related quality control analyses All IS areas and RTs were within the acceptance limits as reported on the summary forms
SampleResults Results for the site water samples and the TB were reported on Laboratory Test Results forms According to the narrative a purge volume of 25 mL was used for all analyses
Analysis run logs were not provided in the data package and results from only one analysis of each sample werereportedSamplesMW-CW-5B-4-23-02 MW-104A-4-23-02MW-102A-4-23-02and MW-DUP1-4-23-02 werereported from 2-fold 10-fold20-fold and20-fold dilutionsrespectively there was no indication in the data package that undiluted analyses of any of these samples were performed The dilution factor used for each sample was appropriate the response for at least one target analyte was nearthe mid-point ofthe calibration rangein the dilutedanalyses Reporting limits for targetanalytesthat werenot detectedwereappropriately adjustedto reflecttheapplicabledilution factor in the four diluted sample analyses
Both method detection limits (MDLs)and RLs aredocumented on the Laboratory Test Resultsform for each sample All RLs reported by the laboratory are equivalent to or above the lowest concentration IC standardassociated with theseanalyses Documentation supportingthe MDLs was not included in the data package and no standards or quality control samples were analyzed at these concentrations inassociation withthisset ofsite samplesTherefore basedon professionaljudgment the evaluator recommends that the data user consider only the RLs as the less than values associated with all non-detected target analyte results
frRILLIUNLc
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Report No 200950 (Volatiles in Water) June 202002 Pace 8 of9
Reported positive sample results that were less than the RL but greater than the MDL were qualified as J by the laboratory These qualifiers were not removed by the evaluator
The laboratory also applied M and H qualifiers to some of the reported sample results These were defined in the data package (page 9) as manually integrated compound and alternate peak selection upon analytical review respectively Qualifiers of this type are usually found only in the raw analytical data due to the limited nature of this review the accuracy of their placement on the sample results and the validity ofthe reported results so generated cannot be verified Sincethey are not validationqualifiersasdefined by RegionI (seeAttachment A) allMand Hqualifiersapplied by the laboratory were removed by the evaluator
The laboratory also applied B qualifiers to results for target analytes that were detected in the associated MBwhether or not thetarget analytewasdetected in thesampleBqualifiersare usually applied only to positive sampleresults for target analytes that were also detected inthe MB All B qualifiers applied by the laboratory were removed by the evaluator
DocumentationCOC records provided in the data package included all reported samples and were properly completed with the following exceptions
bull Improper corrections were noted on both documents In the future all corrections should be made by drawing asingle line through theincorrect information inserting the correct information and initialing and dating the change Obliterations write-overs and unsigned cross-outs are not legally defensible
bull No shipment information was recorded on the 42402 COC and only the notation shipped via FedEx was found on the 42502 COC Both the courier name and the applicable airbill number should be recorded on all COCs
According to the 42602 sample receipt checklist the bottle labelsfor samples collected on42502 included the prefix MW- on all sample identifications this prefix was not included in the identifications recorded on the COC record The sample identifications used throughout this report are those found on the COC record
On Form VI and Form VII (initial and continuing calibration summaries) the dates of the first and last initial calibrationstandards runwere recorded as12702and 42502Based on information provided by the laboratory the entry of 12702 in this space was in error all initial calibration standards associated with this data set were analyzed on 42502 Corrected summary forms were received from the laboratory via USPS on 61902 and were inserted into the data package by the evaluator replacing the originally-provided pages
frRILLIUNLc
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Report No 200950 (Volatiles in Water) June 202002 Page 9 of 9
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this data package review report
Sincerely
Carol A Erikson Quality Assessment Manager
CAEpac 95406April 2002Voa
frRILLIUM
ATTACHMENT A
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS STLConnecticut Report No 200950
EPA Region QualifierDefinitions
V - The material was analyzed for but was not detected The associated numerical value isthesample quantitation limit The samplequantitation limit accountsfor sample-specific dilution factorsand percent solidscorrectionsor samplesizes that deviate from those required by the method
J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity
R - The data are unusable (analyte may or may not be present) Resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification The R replaces the numerical value or sample quantitation limit
UJ - The analyte was analyzed for but was not detected The sample quantitation limit is an estimated quantity
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nuifeer 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMER 0amp M INC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN OAVIQ FUERST
Customer Sample ID MW-102A-4-23-02 Laboratory Sanple ID 200950-2 Date Sampled 04242002 Date Received 04252002 Time Sampled 1240 Time Received 0905 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD bullPARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS mi RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME
8260B Volatile Organics DichIorodifIuoromethane 19 2 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 Chlorcmethane ND 4 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 Vinyl chloride 28 2 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 Bromomethane ND 4 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 Chloroethane 15 8 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 TrichIorofIuoromethane ND 4 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 11-Dlehloroethene ND 4 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 Acetone )CTD U3-44- mdashB- 20 100 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 Methylene chloride ND 6 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 trans-12-Dichloroethene 6 W|90 0Y 4 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 11-Dichloroethane 150 08 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 22-D1chIoropropane 6 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 cis-12-Dichloroethene 290 04 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 2-Butanone(MEK) 6 100 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 Broroochlorcmethane 4 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 Chloroform 06 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 111-Trichloroethane 2 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 11-Dichloropropene 2 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 Carbon tetrachloride 2 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 Benzene 08 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 12-Dichloroethane 9 06 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 Trichloroethene 62 2 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 12-Dlchloropropane 1 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 Dibromomethane 8 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 BromodiehIoromethane 08 10 200000 ugL 497 042602 1510 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 2 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 Toluene 08 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 112-Trichloroethane 2 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 5
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nurtoer 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMER 0 ampMINC PROJECT t NR iANDFIU ATTN OAVlDfUERST
Customer Sample ID MW-102A-4-23-02 Laboratory Sample ID 200950-2 Date Sanpled 04242002 Date Received 04252002 Time Sampled 1240 Time Received 0905 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOO PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS HDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT OATETIME
TetrachIoroethene 13-Diehloropropane Di bromochIoromethane 12-Dibromoethane(EDB) Chlorobenzene 1112-Tetrachloroethane Ethylbenzene mampp-Xylenes o-Xylene Styrene
Brorooforra IsopropyLbenzene Bromobenzene 1122-Tetrachloroethane 123-Trichloropropane n-Propylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene 135-Trimethylbenzene 4-Chlorotoluene tert-Butylbenzene 124-Trimethylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene 13-Diehlorobenzene p-18opropyItoIuene 14-Dichlorobenzene n-iutylbenzene 12-D1chIorobenzene 12-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 124-Tr1chIorobenzene
ND MD ND
NO ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
95
C0t
2 2 2 2 06 04 2 2 2 08 2 2 06 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 08 2 04 2 08 4 08
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000
ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL
4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979
042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602
1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 6
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nunfeer 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMERS O A M1WC PROJECT t Aft LANDFILL ATTN DAVID RIERST
Customer Sample ID MW-102A-4-23-02 Laboratory Sanple ID 200950-2 Date Sampled 04242002 Date Received 04252002 Time Sampled 1240 Time Received 0905 Sanple Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTESTDESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
Kexachlorobutadiene 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1510 pam Naphthalene 123-Triehlorobenzene
10 10
200000 200000
ugL ugL
4979 4979
042602 1510 042602 1510
pam pam
In Description laquo Dry Ugt Page 7
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nutber 200950 0ate05152002
CUSTOMER0N IMC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID KU-DUP1-4-23-02 Laboratory Sanple ID 200950-5 Date Sampled 04242002 Oate Received 04252002 Time Sampled 0900 Time Received 0905 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS mi RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME
8260B Volatile Organics DichIorodifluoromethane Chloromethane Vinyl chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane Triehlorofluoromethane 11-Dlchloroethene Acetone Methylene chloride trans-12-DichIoroethene 11-Dichloroethane 22-Dichloropropane ci3bull12-Dichloroethene 2-Butanone(MEK) Bromochloromethane Chloroform 111-Trichloroethane 11-Dichloropropene Carbon tetrachloride Benzene 12-DichIoroethane Trichloroethene 12-Dichloropropane Dibromomethane Bromodichloromethane 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) Toluene 112-Trichloroethane
ND
ND
21
33
19 MD ND )ltJD UJ4J |01A f
6 160
330
11 70
--CO bull J
2 4 2 4 8 4 4
20 6 4 08 6 04 6 4 06 2 2 2 08 08 2 1 8 08 2 08 2
10 10 10 10 10 10 10
100 10 10 10 10 10
100 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000
ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL
4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979
042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602
1544 1544 1544 1544 1544 1544 1544 1544 1544 1544 1544 1544 1544 1S44 1544 1544 1544 1544 1544 1544 1544 1544 1544 1544 1544 1544 1544 1544
In Description = Dry Ugt Page 14
Job Number 200950
CUSTOMS)0fc INC
Customer Sstaple ID MU-DUP14-23-02 Date Sampled 04242002 Time Sampled 0900 Sample Matrix Water
PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTIONTEST METHOD
TetrechIoroethene 13-Dichloropropane D1bromochIoromethane 12-Dibromoethane(EDB) Chlorobenzene 1112-Tetrachloroethane Ethylbenzene mampp-Xylenes o-Xylene Styrene Bromoform Isopropylbenzene Bromobenzene 11f22-Tetrachloroethane 123-Trichloropropane n-Propylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene 135-Trimethylbenzene 4-Chlorotoluene tert-Butylbenzene 124-Trimethylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene 13-Dfchlorobenzene p-l80propyltoluene 14-Oichlorobenzene n-Butylbenzene 12D1ehlorobenzene 12Dibrocno-3-chloropropane 124-Tr1chIorobenzene
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S
PROJECT t RR LANDFILL
Laboratory Sample ID 200950-5 Date Received 04252002 Time Received 0905
SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS regL RL DILUTION
110 2 10 200000 2 10 200000
ND 2 10 200000 ND 2 10 200000
ND
06 10 200000 04 10 200000
ND 2 ND
10 200000 ND 2 20 200000 ND 2 10 200000 ND 08 10 200000 ND 2 10 200000
2 10 200000 ND J 06 10 200000 ND 2 10 200000 ND 2 10 200000 ND 2 10 200000 ND 2 10 200000 ND 2 10 200000 ND 2 10 200000 ND 2 10 200000 ND 2 10 200000 ND 2 10 200000 ND 08 10 230000 ND 2 10 200000 ND 04 10 200000 ND 2 10 200000 ND 08 10 200000 ND 4 10 200000 ND 08 10 200000
Date05152002
ATTN DAVID FUERST
UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
ugL ugL
4979 4979
042602 042602
1544 1544
pan pan
ugL ugL
4979 4979
042602 042602
1544 1544
pan pan
ugL ugL
4979 4979
042602 042602
1544 1544
pan pan
ugL 4979 042602 1544 pam
ugL ugL
4979 4979
042602 042602
1544 1544
pan pan
ugL ugL
4979 4979
042602 042602
1544 1544
pan pan
ugL 4979 042602 1544 pan ugL 4979 042602 1S44 pan
ugL 4979 042602 1544 pan
ugL ugL
4979 4979
042602 042602
1544 1544
pan pan
ugL 4979 042602 1544 pan
ugL 4979 042602 1544 pam ugL 4979 042602 1544 pan ugL ugL
4979 4979
042602 042602
1544 1544
pan pan
ugL ugL
4979 4979
042602 042602
1544 1544
pan pan
ugL 4979 042602 1544 pan ugL ugL
4979 4979
042602 042602
1544 1544
pan
ugL ugL ugL
4979 4979 4979
042602 042602 042602
1544 1544 1544
pan pan
Page 15 In Description Dry 1ampgt
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nmfeer 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMER 0gtFT IRC PROJECT L RR LAWFUL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sanple ID HU-DUP1-4-23-02 Laboratory Sample ID 200950-5 Date Sampled 04242002 Date Received 04252002 Time Sampled 0900 Time Received 0905 Sample Hatrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS mi RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
Kexachlorobutadiene r 2 10 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1544 pam Naphthalene 123-Trichlorobenzene i 8
08 10 10
200000 200000
ugL ugL
4979 4979
042602 1544 042602 1544
pern pam
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 16
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMER0ampX IRC PROJECTS L RS LAJffiFiLL ATTN 0AV10 FUERST
Customer Sample ID MW-104A-4-23-02 Laboratory Sample ID 2009503 Date Sampled 04242002 Date Received 04252002 Time Sampled 1415 Time Received 0905 Sanple Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS m RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME
8260B Volatile Organlcs Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 Chloromethane 2 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 Vinyl chloride 1 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 Bropinmethane 2 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 CMoroethane 33 4 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 2 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 11DichIoroethene KD 2 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 Acetone SO 10 50 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 Methylene chloride 4 3 5 100000 ugL 4979 1247042602trans-12-Dichloroethene 3 2 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 11-DichIoroetharm 130 04 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 22-DichIoropropane 3 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 cis12-Dichloroethene 02 5 100000 ugL 4979 12470426022-Butanone(MEK) 3 50 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 BromochIoromethane 2 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 Chloroform 03 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 111-Trichloroethane 1 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 11-Oiehloropropene 1 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 Carbon tetrachloride 1 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 Benzene 28 04 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 12-DiehIoroethane 5 04 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 Trichloroethene 1 5 100000 ugL 12474979 04260212-DichIoropropane 05 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 Dibrooomethane 4 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 Bromodichloromethane 04 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 4Methyl2pentanone(MIBK) 1 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 Toluene 04 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 112-THchloroethane 1 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247
In Description Dry Wgt Page 8
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job number 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMER INC PROJECTRR LANDFILL ATTN DAVIO FUERST
Customer Sample ID MW-1Q4A-4-Z3-02 Date Sampled 04242002 Time Saopled 1415 Sample Matrix Water
TEST NETNCO PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION
TetrachIoroethene 13-Dichloropropane Di bromochIoromethane 12-Dfbrcmoethane(EDB) Chlorobenzene 1112-Tetrachloroethane Ethylbenzene mip-Xylenes o-Xylerte Styrene Bromoform IsopropyIbenzene Bromobenzene 1122-Tetrachloroethane 123-Trichloropropane n-Propylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene 135-TrimethyIbenzene 4-Chlorotoluene tert-Butylbenzene 124-Trimethylbenzene sec-8utylbenzene 13-Dichlorobenzene p-IsopropyItoluene 14-Dichlorobenzene n-feutylbenzene 12-Dichlorobenzene 12-Dibroroo-3-chloropropane 124-TrichIorobenzene
SAMPLE RESULT
12
100 110 46
13
43
14 28
5 37
Laboratory Sample ID 200950-3 Date Received 04252002 Time Received 0905
FUGS HDL RL
5 5 5 5
S 5 5 51
10
f 5 5 5
j 5 5 5 5 5
y u uf
-5 5 5 5 5
a 4 5 5
2 5 5
04 5ri 5
2 5 04 5
DILUTION
100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000
UNITS
ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL
BATCH
4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979
DT DATETIKE
042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247 042602 1247
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 9
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nuifeer 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMER 0 amp M IMC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID fUESST
Customer Sanple ID MW-104A-4-23-02 Laboratory Sanple ID 200950-3 Date Sampled 04242002 Date Received 04252002 Time Sampled 1415 Time Received 0905 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH OT DATETIME TECH
Hexachlorobutadiene 1 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 pam Naphthalene 42 4 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 pam 123-Trichlorobenzene 04 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1247 pam
In Description deg Dry Wgt Page 10
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nunber 200950 Dete05152002
CUSTOMER0amp IRC PROJECT LR8 LAMQPILt ATTN OAVIOfUERST
Customer Sample ID MV-CW-5B-4-23-02 Date Sampled 04242002 Time Saopled 1045 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION
8260B Volatile Organlcs DIchIorodifluorooethane Chloromethane Vinyl chloride Branomethane Chloroethane Tr1chIorofIuoromethane 11-Dlchloroethene Acetone Methylene chloride trans-12-Dichloroethene 11-Dichloroethene 22-Dlchloropropane ci8-12-DIehloroethene 2-Butanone(MEK) BrotnochIoromethane Chloroform 111-Tr1chloroethane 11-01chloropropene Carbon tetrachloride Benzene 12-DichIoroethane Trlchloroethene 12-Dlchloropropane Dlbrooomethane Bromodlchloromethane 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) Toluene 112-Trlchloroethane
SAMPLE RESULT
7 ND
3 ND
09 ND
-r05io uXamdash
1 ND
12 ND
7 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND
Laboratory Sample ID 200950-1 Date Received 04252002 Time Received 0905
FLAGS raquoL RL
02 04 02 04 08 04 04 2 10
0ltampt jtijol 06 04 008 06 004 06 10 04 006 02 02 02 008 008 02 01 08 008 02 008 02
DILUTION
200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000
UNITS
ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL
BATCH
4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979
OT DATETIME
042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436 042602 1436
In Description raquo Dry Wgt Page 2
Job Number 200950
CUSTOMER IT A M INC
Customer Sample ID HW-CW-5B-4-23-02 Date Sampled 04242002 Time Sampled 1045 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION
Tetrachloroethene 13-Dichloropropane Dibromochloromethene 12-Dibromoethane(EDB) Chlorobenzene 1112-Tetrachloroethane Ethylbenzene mampp-Xylenes o-Xylene Styrene Bromoform Isopropylbenzene Bromobenzene 1122-TetrachIoroethane 123-TrichIoropropane n-Propylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene 135-Trimethylbenzene 4-Chlorotoluene tert-Butylbenzene 124-Trimethylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene 13-Dichlorobenzene p-Isopropyltoluene 14-Dichlorobenzene n-Sutylbenzene 12-Dichlorobenzene 12-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 124-TrichIorobenzene
L A B O R A T O R Y
PROJECT
SAMPLE REdULT
35 ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
03 ND ND ND ND
T E S T R E S U L T S
t-RS LANDFILL
Laboratory Sample ID 200950-1 Date Received 04252002 Time Received 0905
FLAGS HDL RL
02 02 02 02 006 004 02 02 02 008 02 02 006 02 02 02
uT 02 02 02fti |ov 02 02 02 008 02 004
C V 02bjl^ov 008 04 008
DILUTION
200000 200JOO 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000
Date05152002
ATTN DAVID FUERST
UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME
ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436 ugL 4979 042602 1436
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 3
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nunber 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMERO A NINC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN OAVIreg FUERST
Customer Saople ID MU-CW-5B-4-23-02 Laboratory Satqple ID 200950-1 Date Sampled 04242002 Date Received 04252002 Time Sampled 1045 Time Received 0905 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS HDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
Hexechlorobutadiene 02 200000 ugL 4979 042602 1436 pan Naphthalene 123-Trichlorobenzene 4
06 008
200000 200000
ugL ugL
4979 4979
042602 1436 042602 1436
pan pan
CM llilt)shy
In Description = Dry Ugt Page 4
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOKERsOampnt INC PROJECTS IRRLAKOFILL ATTN DAVID FUESST
Customer Sample ID MU-CV-7A-4-23-02 Laboratory Sample ID 200950-4 Date Sampled 04242002 Date Received 04252002 Time Sampled 1540 Time Received 0905 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METH00 PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT PUGS KDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME
8260B Volatile Organics Dichlorodifluoromethane NO 01 05 100U00 ugL 4979 042602 1321 Chloromethane NO 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 Vinyl chloride NO 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 Bromomethane HD 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 Chloroethane NO 04 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 02 05 100000 14IL 4979 042602 1321 11-Dichloroethene ND 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 Acetone S kS 1 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321
$ Methylene chloride ND 03 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 trans-12-DichIoroethene ND 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 11-Dichloroethane 02 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 22-0ichloropropene ND 03 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 cis-12-DichIoroethene ND 002 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 2-Butanone(MEK) ND 03 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 Bromochloromethane ND 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 1321042602Chloroform ND 003 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 111-TrichIoroethene ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 11-Dichloropropene ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 Carbon tetrachloride ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 Benzene ND 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 12-Diehloroethane ND 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 Trichloroethene ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 12-Dichloropropane ND 005 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 Dibromomethane ND 04 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 Bromodichloromethane ND 004 05 100000 ugL 13214979 0426024-Methyl-2-pentenone(MIBK) ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 Toluene ND 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 112-Trichloroethane ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321
In Description Ory Wgt Page 11
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nurfcer 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMER 0amp INC PROJECT IRRtANDFltt ATTN DAVID PUERST
Customer Sanple ID KW-CU-7A-4-23-02 Laboratory Sanple ID 200950-4 Date Sanpled 04242002 Date Received 04252002 Time Sampled 1540 Time Received 0905 Sanple Matrix Water
TESTMETHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESJLT FLAGS WraquoL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME
Tetrachloroethene 01 05 100000 ugL 979 042602 13-D1chIoropropane 01 05 100000 ugL 979 042602 DibromochIoromethane 12-Dibromoethene(EDB) ChLorobenzene 1112-Tetrechloroethane Ethylbenzene mampp-Xylenes o-Xylene Styrene
01 01 003 002 01 01 01 004
05 05 05 05 05 1 05 05
100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000
ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL
979 979 979 979 979 979 979 979
042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602
Bromoform 01 05 100000 ugL 979 042602 laopropylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 979 042602 Brcmobenzene 003 05 100000 ugL 979 042602 1122-Tetrachloroethene 123-Trichloropropane
01 01
05 05
100000 100000
ugL ugL
979 979
042602 042602
n-Propylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene tr
01 01
05 05
100000 100000
ugL ugL
979 979
042602 042602
135-Trimethylbenzene 4-Chlorotoluene
01 01
05 05
100000 100000
ugL ugL
979 979
042602 042602
tert-Butylbenzene 124-Trimethylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene
01 01 01
05 05 05
100000 100000 100000
ugL ugL ugL
979 979 979
042602 042602 042602
13-Dichlorobenzene 004 05 100000 ugL 979 042602 p-Isopropyltoluene 14-Didilorobenzene n-thitylbenzene
01 002 01
05 05 05
100000 100000 100000
ugL ugL ugL
979 979 979
042602 042602 042602
12-Dichlorobenzene 12-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 124-TrichIorobenzene
004 02 004
05 05 05
100000 100000 100000
ugL ugL ugL
979 979 979
042602 042602 042602
In Description raquo Dry Ugt Page 12
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nuifaer 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMER 0 amp H IMC PROJECT L RR LAJtQFlLL ATTN OAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID HU-CU-7A-4-23-02 Laboratory Sanple ID 200950-4 Date Sampled 04242002 Date Received 04252002 Time Saitpled 1540 Time Received 0905 Sample Matrix Uater
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS Kgt1 RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH OT DATETIME TECH
Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene I c4 01
04 05 05
100000 100000
ugL ugL
4979 4979
042602 1321 042602 1321
pam pam
123-Trfchlorobenzene 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1321 pam
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 13
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nunber 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMEROampH IRC PROJECT L R LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID bullSlh50n2SQ Laboratory Sanple ID 200950-12 Date Sampled 04252002 a Date Received 04262002 Time Sampled 1200 Time Received 0910 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS MDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME
8260B Volatile Organics Dichlorodifluorcmethane ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 Chloromethane ND 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 Vinyl chloride ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 Bromomethane ND 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 Chloroethane ND 04 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 TrichIorofluoromethane ND 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 11-Dichloroethene ND 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 Acetone 1 5 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 Methylene chloride ND 03 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 trans-12-Dichloroethene ND 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 11-Dichloroethane ND 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 22-Dichloropropane ND 03 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 cis-12-Dichloroethene ND 002 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 2-8utanone(MEK) ND 03 5 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 Bromochloromethane ND 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 Chloroform ND 003 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 111-Trichloroethane ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 11-DichIoropropene ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 Carbon tetrachloride ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 Benzene ND 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 12-Dichloroethene ND 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 Trichloroethene ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 12-DichIoropropane ND 005 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 Dibromomethane ND 04 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 Bramodichloromethane ND 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 Toluene ND 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 112-Trichloroethane ND 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 35
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Ntnfeer 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMER0MRC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sanple 10bull6W-5-Q4laquo23n02 Laboratory Sample ID 200950-12 Date Senpled Time Sampled Sample Matrix
04252002 1200 Water
yampGlampldr Date Received Time Received
04262002 0910
TEST METKOO PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FUGS HDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME
Tetrachloroethene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 13-Dichloropropane 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 D1broroochIoromethane 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 12-Dibramoethane(EDB) 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 Chlorobenzene 003 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 1112-Tetrachloroethane 002 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 Ethylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 mampp-Xylenes 01 1 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 o-Xylene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 Styrene 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 Bromoform 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 sopropyIbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 Bromobenzene 003 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 1122-Tetrachloroethane 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 123-Trichloropropane 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 n-Propylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 2-Chlorotoluene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 135-Trimethylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 4-Chlorotoluene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 tert-Butylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 124-Trimethylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 sec-Butylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 13-D1chlorobenzene 004 05 100000 ugL 12524979 042902p-Isopropyltoluene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 14-D1chlorobenzene 002 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 n-fiutylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 12-Dichlorobenzene 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252 12-Dibrono-3-chloropropane 02 05 100000 4979ugL 042902 1252 124-Trichlorobenzene 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1252
mM0 In Description = Dry Ugt Page 36
Job Nufeer 200950 L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S
Date05152002
CUSTOMER0amp H INC PROJECT I RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID iU 5 M 23 02 Date Sanpled 04252002 Time Sampled 1200 Sample Matrix Water
Cu nf
Laboratory Sample ID 200950-12 Date Received 04262002 Tine Received 0910
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION
Hexechlorobutadiene Naphthalene 123-Trichlorobenzene
SAMPLERESULT
upound
U3
FLAGS
A HDL
01 04 004
RL
05 05 05
DILUTION
100000 100000 100000
UNITS
ugL ugL ugL
BATCH
4979 4979 4979
DT OATETINE TECH
042902 1252 042902 1252 042902 1252
pan pam pam
In Description a Dry Wgt Page 37
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nunber 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMER 0amplaquof IRC PROJECT L RR LAWFUL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Saople ID Date Sanpled 04252002 Time Sampled 0900 Sample Matrix Rater
TEST METHOO PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION
8260B Volatile Organics Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane Vinyl chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane TrichIorofIuorcmethene 11-D1chloroethene Acetone Methylene chloride trans-12-Dichloroethene 11-Dichloroethane 22-DichIoropropane cf812Dichloroethene 2-Butanone(MEN) Bromochloromethane Chloroform 111-TrichIoroethane 11-Dichloropropene Carbon tetrachloride Benzene 12-DichIoroethane Trichloroethene 120ichIoropropane Dibromomethane Brompdichloromethane 4-Hethyl-2pentanone(MIBK) Toluene 112-Trichloroethane
Camptbjwjor
SAMPLE RESULT
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 5 (AO bull ND ND ND ND ND ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Laboratory Sample ID 20095013 Date Received 04262002 Time Received 0910
FUGS NDL RL
01 05 02 05 01 05 02 05 04 05 02 05 02 05
03 05 02 05 004 05 1 5
03 05 002 05 03 5 02 05 003 05 01 05 01 05 01 05 004 05 004 05 01 05 005 05 04 05 004 05 01 05 004 05 01 05
DILUTION
100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000
UNITS
UBL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL
BATCH
4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979
OT DATETrME
042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326 042902 1326
In Description raquo Dry Wgt Page 38
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nwfeer 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMER0amp INC PROJECTL RR LARDFlit ATTN OAV1D FUERST
Customer Sample ID SW-DUPto-H-OZ 1 Laboratory Sanple ID 200950-13 Date Sanpled Time Sampled
04252002 0900
Date Received Time Received
04262002 0910
Sample Matrix Uater
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULTs FLAGS HDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT OATETIME
Tetrachloroethene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 13-D1chIoropropane 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 Dibromochloromethane 12-Dibroraoethane ltEDB) Chlorobenzene 1112-Tetrachloroethane
01 01 003 002
05 05 05 05
100000 100000 100000 100000
ugL ugL ugL ugL
4979 4979 4979 4979
042902 042902 042902 042902
Ethylbenzene mampp-Xylenes o-Xylene Styrene
01 01 01 004
05 1 05 05
100000 100000 100000 100000
ugL ugL ugL ugL
4979 4979 4979 4979
042902 042902 042902 042902
Bromoform 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 Isopropylbenzene 0 1 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 Bromobenzene 1122-TetrachIoroethane
003 01
05 05
100000 100000
ugL ugL
4979 4979
042902 042902
123-Trichloropropane 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 n-Propylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene 135-Trimethylbenzene 4-Chlorotoluene tert-Butylbenzene 124-Trlmethylbenzene
01 01 01 01 01 01
05 05 05 05 05 05
100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000
ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL
4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979
042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902
secButylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 13-Dlchlorobenzene p-laopropyltoluene 14-Dlchlorobenzene
004 01 002
05 05 05
100000 100000 100000
ugL ugL ugL
4979 4979 4979
042902 042902 042902
n-fiutylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 12-DIchlorobenzene 12-D1bromo-3-chloropropane
004 02
05 05
100000 100000
ugL ugL
4979 4979
042902 042902
124-Trichlorobenzene uJ 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902
In Description laquo Dry Wgt Page 39
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMER 0 A H INC PROJECT t RS LANSPILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample irt BW-DUP-1H-V7 Laboratory Sample ID 200950-13 Date Sampled Time Sampled
04252002 0900 tetotflo tr Date Received
Time Received 04262002 0910
Sample Matrix Uater
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS MDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene
vS A 01 04
05 05
100000 100000
ugL ugL
4979 4979
042902 1326 042902 1326
pam pam
123-Trichlorobenzene 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1326 pam
In Description Dry Wgt Page 40
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nuifcer 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMEROamp M IRC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID RIERST
Customer Sample IDSWlaquo8-M-2V02bull Laboratory Saiqple ID 200950-9 Date Received 04262002
K J55poundi =sect2002 Time Received 0910 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS HDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME
8260B Volatile Organies Dichlorodifluoromethene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 Chloromethane 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 Vinyl chloride 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 Brcmomethane 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 Chloroethane 05 04 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 TrichIorofIuoromethane
fl 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1
11-Dichloroethene 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 Acetone 6 U3 1 5 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 Methylene chloride 03 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 trans-12-Dichloroethene 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 11-Oichloroethane 03 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 22-Dichloropropene 03 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 cis-12-Dichloroethene 01 002 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1IA 2-Butanone(NEK) 03 5 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 BromochIoromethane 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 Chloroform 003 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 111-Trichloroethane 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 11-Diehloropropene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 Carbon tetrachloride 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 Benzene 05 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 12-Dichloroethane 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 Trichloroethene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 12-Dichloropropane 005 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 Dibromomethane 04 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 BroraodichIoromethane 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 Toluene 02 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 112-Trichloroethane 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1
In Description Dry Wgt Page 26
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 200950 0ate05152002
CUSTOMER OS NINC PROJECTsL RampLANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Senile ID ltW 8 04-23-02 3W --030 Laboratory Sample ID 200950-9 Date Sampled 04252002 Date Received 04262002 Time Sampled 1125 Time Received 0910 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METKOO PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT Flags HDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATEAIME TECH
TetrachIoroethene 13-D1chIoropropane DibrofnochIoromethane 12-Dibromoethane(EDB)
01 01 01 01
05 05 05 05
100000 100000 100000 100000
ugL ugL ugL ugL
4979 4979 4979 4979
042902 1 042902 1 042902 1 042902 1
pam pam pam pam
Chlorobenzene 1112-Tetrachloroethane
003 002
05 05
100000 100000
ugL ugL
4979 4979
042902 1 042902 1
pam pam
Ethylbenzene mSp-Xylenes 01
01 01
05 1
100000 100000
ugL ugL
4979 4979
042902 1 042902 1
pam pam
o-Xylene 01 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1 pam Styrene Bromoform Isopropylbenzene 08
004 01 01
05 05 05
100000 100000 100000
ugL ugL ugL
4979 4979 4979
042902 1 042902 1 042902 1
pam pam pam
Bromobenzene 1122-TetrachIoroethane
003 01
05 05
100000 100000
ugL ugL
4979 4979
042902 1 042902 1
pam pam
123-Tr1chloropropane n-Propylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene 135-Trimethylbenzene 4-Chlorotoluene tert-Butylbenzene 124-Trlmethylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene
03 01
01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05
100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000
ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL
4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979
042902 1 042902 1 042902 1 042902 1 042902 1 042902 1 042902 1 042902 1
pam pam pam pam pam pam pam pam
13-01chlorobenzene p-Isopropyltoluene 14-Dichlorobenzene n-Butylbenzene 12-Dichlorobenzene 12-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 124-TrichIorobenzene
004 01 002 01 004 02 004
05 05 05 05 05 05 05
100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000
ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL
4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979
042902 1 042902 1 042902 1 042902 1 042902 1 042902 1 042902 1
pam pam pam pam pam pam pam
In Description Dry Wgt Page 27
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 200950 Dete05152002
CUSTOMERSamp HINC PROJECTit RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample IDj-SW-bullB-OA-23-Og Laboratory Sample ID 200950-9 Date Received 04262002
iE SS3 n-i2002 Time Received 0910 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS HDL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene aS
01 04
05 05
100000 100000
ugL ugL
4979 4979
042902 1111 042902 1111
pam pan
123-Trichlorobeniene U5 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1111 pam
0
In Description raquo Dry Ugt Page 28
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMER04MIMC PROJECT t Rfi LANDFILL ATTN OAVIO FUERST
Customer Sample ID euroM 10 OA S3 02 Laboratory Saople ID 200950-8 Date Sampled 04252002 Date Received 04262002OAtafamplo Time Sampled 1050 Time Received 0910 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS HJl RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH OT DATETIME
8260B Volatile Organica Dichlorodifluoromethane 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 Chloromethane 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 Vinyl chloride 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 Bromomethane 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 Chloroethane 09 04 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 Trichlorofluoromethane ND
X 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 11-Dichloroethene ND 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 Acetone pounduJ-laquo- 1 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 Methylene chloride ND U gt 03 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 trans-12-D1chIoroethene ND u 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725
c- 11-DichIoroethane 02 J 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 22-Dichloropropane u 03 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 cis-12-0ichloroethene sect 002 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725
N
2-Butanone(MEK) 05 03 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 Bromochloromethane u 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 Chloroform u 003 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 1f11-Trichloroethane u 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 11-Dlchloropropene u 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 Carbon tetrachloride u 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 Benzene u 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 12-Dichloroethane u 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 Trichloroethene u 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 12-Dichloropropane u 005 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 Dibromomethane u 04 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 Bromodichloromethane u 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) u 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 Toluene u 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725 112-Triehloroethane u 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1725
In Description = Dry Ugt Page 23
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMER0A NINC PROJECTfc RRLANDFItt ATTNDAVID FUERST
Customer Sanple 10 SW 10 0 23 02- -0 bC ~ Laboratory Sample ID 200950-8 Date Sampled Time Sampled
04252002 flJC 1050
laquobull OrvfQ7
Date Received Time Received
04262002 0910
Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS MDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME
Tetrachloroethene 13-0ichloropropane Dibromochloromethane 1 2-Oibromoethane(EDB) Cnlarobenzene 1112-Tetrachloroethane Ethylbenzene mampp-Xylenes o-Xylene Styrene Bromoform IsopropyIbenzene Brocnobenzene 1122-Tetrachloroethane 123-Trichloropropane n-Propylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene 135-Trimethylbenzene 4-Chlorotoluene tert-Butylbenzene 124-Trimethylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene 13-DiehIorobenzene p-IsopropyItoluene 14-Dichlorobenzene n-Butylbenzene 12-Dichlorobenzene 12-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 124-TrichIorobenzene
ND ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
uS
Alt
01 01 01 01 003 002 01 01 01 004 01 01 003 01 01 01 01 01 0 1 01 01 01 004 01 002 01 004 02 004
05 05 05 05 05 05 05 1 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 OS
100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 109000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000
ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug
4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979
042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602 042602
1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725 1725
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 24
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S
Job Number 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMER 0ampM INC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample IDbullSW-10-0t-2l-Q2 Dete Sampled 04252002 Time Sampled 1050
ampLtufaor Laboratory Sample ID 200950-8 Date Received 04262002 Time Received 0910
Sample Matrix Water
TEST METH00 PARAHtTERTEST description SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS HDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT OATETIME TECH
Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene 123-Trichlorobeniene
X yr r W
01 04 004
05 05 05
100000 100000 100000
ugL UflL ugL
4979 4979 4979
042602 1725 042602 1725 042602 1725
pam pam pam
-lt]
In Description Dry Wgt Page 25
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job NLeber 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMER 0 amp INC PROJECT L RS LANDFILL ATTN BAVIO FUERST
Customer Sample 10-CU 16 04 23 02 Laboratory Sample ID 200950-11 Date Sampled 04252002 Date Received 04262002 Time Sanpled 1045 CamptfafpfjoY Time Received 0910 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION sample Result FLAGS MDt RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME
82608 Volatile Organics DichIorodifIuoromethane Chloromethane Vinyl chloride Bi otxxnethane Chloroethane TrichIorofIuoromethane 11-Dichloroethene Acetone Methylene chloride trans-12-Dichloroethene 11-Oichloroethane 22-Dichloropropane cis-12-Dichloroethene 2-Butanone(NEK) Bromoehloromethane Chloroform 111-Trichloroethane 11-DichIoropropene Carbon tetrachloride Benzene 12-Dichloroethane Trichloroethene 12-0ichloropropane Dibromomethane
ND ND ND ND ND ND
f u -a-ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
-B- ^
3
01 02 01 02 04 02 02 1 03 02 004 03 002 03 02 003 01 01 01 004 004 01 005 04
05 05 05 05 05 05 05 5 05 05 05 05 05 5 05 05 05 05 05 05 OS 05 05 05
100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000
ugL igL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL
4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979
042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902
1218 1218 1218 1218 1218 1218 1218 1218 1218 1218 1218 1218 1218 1218 1218 1218 1218 1218 1218 1218 1218 1218 1218 1218
Bromodiehloromethane 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) Toluene 112-TrichIoroethane
ND ND
ND 03
004 01 004 01
05 05 05 05
1J0000 100000 100000 100000
ugL ugL ugL ugL
4979 4979 4979 4979
042902 042902 042902 042902
1218 1218 1218 1216
In Description laquo Dry Ugt Page 32
Job Nimfcer 200950
CUSTOMERj OINC
Customer Sample ID16-04-3302 Date Sampled 04252002 Time Sampled 1045 Sanple Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION
Tetrad)loroethene 13-Dichloropropane Di broroochloromethane 12-Dibromoethane(EDB) Chlorobenzene 1112-Tetrachloroethane Ethylbenzene mampp-XyLenes o-Xylene Styrene Bromofortn Isopropylbenzene Bromobenzene 1122-Tetrachloroethane 123 Trichloropropane n-Propylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene 135-Trimethylbenzene 4-Chlorotoluene teft-Butylbenzene 124-Trimethylbenzene sec-Butylbemene 13-Dichlorobenzerte p-Isopropyltoluene 14-0ichloroben2ene n-Butylbenzene 12-Dichlorobenzene 12-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 12 4-Trichlorobenzene
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S
PROJECT SR LAKDF ILL
Laboratory Sanple ID 200950-11 Date Received 04262002
OAfowlor Time Received 0910
DILUTIONSAMPLE RESULT FUGS HDL Rl
01 05 100000ND 01 05 100000ND 01 05 100000ND
ND 01 05 100000 003 05 100000ND 002 05 100000ND
ND 01 05 100000
ND 01 1 100000 01 05 100000ND 004 05 100000ND 01 05 100000ND
ND 01 05 100000 ND 003 05 100000
ND 01 05 100000 01 05 100000ND
ND 01 05 100000 ND 01 05 100000
ND 01 05 100000 01 05 100000ND
05 100000 ND 01 05 100000 ND
03 01
01 05 100000 004 05 100000ND
03 01 05 100000 ND 002 05 100000
ND 01 05 100000
ND 004 05 100000 02 05 100000ND 004 05 100000ND itf
Date05152002
ATTN OAV10 FUERST
UNITS BATCH OT DATETIME TECH
ugL 4979 042902 1218 pam ugL 4979 042902 1216 pan ugL 4979 042902 1218 pam ugL 4979 042902 1218 pam ugL 4979 042902 1218 pam ugL 4979 042902 1218 pam ugL 4979 042902 1218 pam ugL 4979 042902 1218 pam
ugL 4979 042902 1218 pam ugL 4979 042902 1218 pam ugL 4979 042902 1218 pam ugL 4979 042902 1218 ugL 4979 042902 1218 ugL 4979 042902 1218 pam ugL 4979 042902 1218 pam ugL 4979 042902 1218 pan ugL 4979 042902 1218 pam ugL 4979 042902 1218 pam ugL 4979 042902 1216 pam
pamugL 4979 042902 1218 ugL 4979 042902 1218 pam ugL 4979 042902 1218 pam
pamugL 4979 042902 1218 ugL 4979 042902 1218 pam ugL 4979 042902 1218 pam ugL 4979 042902 1218 pam
pamugL 4979 042902 1216 ugL 4979 042902 1218 pam ugL 4979 042902 1218 pam
Page 33in Description laquo Dry Ugt
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMER0amp M INC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID W16-04-a3-02 Laboratory Sanple ID 200950-11 Date Saddled 04252002 Date Received 04262002 Time Sampled 1045 Time Received 0910 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS KDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
Hexachlorobutadiene u5 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1218 pam Naphthalene 123-Trichlorobenzene amp
H
04 004
05 05
100000 100000
ugL ugL
4979 4979
042902 1218 042902 1218
pam pam
-S
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 34
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMER0amp M INC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN OAVIOFUERST
Customer Sample ID-LCI 3 04 2302 L-CM~ Laboratory Sample ID 200950-10 Date Sanpled 04252002 Date Received 04252002 Time Sailed 0938 QOampOWO8 Time Received 0910 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS MDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH OT DATETIME
82608 Volatile Organise DlchIorodlfluoromethane Chloromethane Vinyl chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane Trichlorofluoromethane 11-Dfchloroethene Acetone Methylene chloride trans-12-DichIoroethene 11-Dichloroethane 22-Dichloropropane cis-12-Dichloroethene 2-Butenone(MEK) BromochIorocnethane Chloroform 111-Tr1chloroethane 11-0ichloropropene Carbon tetrachloride Benzene 12-Dichloroethane Trichloroethene 12-Dichloropropane Dibromomethane Brcmodichloromethane 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) Toluene 112-Tr1chIoroethane
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Suf ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
-B X
J
sect
01 02 01 02 04 02 02 1 03 02 004 03 002 03 02 003 01 01 01 004 004 01 005 04 004 01 004 01
05 05 05 05 05 05 05 5 05 OS 05 05 05 5 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 0 05 05 05
100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 10000J 100000 100000
ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL
4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979
042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902 042902
45 45 45 45 45
1145 45 45 45
1145 45 45 45 45 45
1145 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 29
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 200950 0ate05152002
CUSTOMER0amp H INC PROJECT LPR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID bCII 3 OA B3-021 lCH Laboratory Sample ID 200950-10 Date Sampled 04252002 Date Received 04252002 Time Sampled 0938 Time Received 0910 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOO PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS HDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME
Tetrachloroethene U 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1145 13-DichIoropropane U 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1145 Dibroooehloromethane U 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 12-Dibromoethane(EDB) u 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 Chlorobenzene u 003 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 1112-Tetraehloroethane u 002 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 Ethylbenzene u 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 mampp-Xylenes U 01 1 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 o-Xylene u 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 Styrene u 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1145 Brocnoform u 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 Isopropylbenzene u 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 Bromobenzene u 003 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 1122-TetrachIoroethane u 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 123-Trichloropropane u 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 n-Propylbenzene u 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 2-Chlorotoluene u 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 135-Trimethylbenzene u 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 4-Chlorotoluene u 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 tert-Butylbenzene u 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 124-Trimethylbenzene u 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 sec-ButyIbenzene u 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 13-Dichlorobenzene u 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 p-Isopropyltoluene u 01 05 100000 ugL 0429024979 45 14-Dichlorobenzene u 002 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 n-Sutylbenzene u 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 4504290212-Dichlorobenzene u 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 12-Dibromo-3-chloropropane u 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 45 124-TrichLorobenzene 004 05 ugLttf 100000 4979 042902 45
In Description Dry Wgt Page 30
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nwfcer 200950 DateQ51520Q2
CUSTOMER0ampKINC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample IP-feCII 3 04 03 02 LCampshy Laboratory Sample ID 200950-10 Date Sampled 04252002 Date Received 04252002 Time Sampled 0938 Time Received 0910 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS MDL 8L DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
HexachIorobutadiene ikS 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1145 pam Naphthalene 04 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1145 pam 123-TrichIorobenzene 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042902 1145 pam
cs H
bdquoygt
bull In Description = Dry Wgt Page 31
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Umber 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMER 0amp N INC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sanple ID bCIl 4 04 23 02 Date Sampled 04252002 Time Sampled 0945 Sample Matrix Uater
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION
8260B Volatile Organics DichIorodifIuoromethane Chloromethane Vinyl chloride Bronnmethane Chloroethane TrichlorofIuoromethane 11-DichIoroethene Acetone Methylene chloride trans-12-Dichloroethene 11-Dichloroethane 22-Dichloropropane cis-12-Dichloroethene 2-Butanone(MEK) Bromochlorcmethane Chloroform 111-Trichloroethene 11-DichIoropropene Carbon tetrachloride Benzene 12-Dichloroethane Trichloroethene 12-Dichloropropane Dibromomethane Broraodichloromethane 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) Toluene 112-TrichIoroethane
SAMPLE RESULT
21
6 UJ 09 07
10
03 3
Laboratory Sample ID 200950-7 Date Received 04262002 Time Received 0910
FUGS MDL RL
01 05 02 05 01 05 02 05 04 05 02 05 02 05
i 1 5 03 05 02 05 004 05 03 05 002 05 03 5 02 05 003 05 01 05 01 05 01 05 004 05 004 05 01 05 005 05 04 05 004 05 01 05 004 05 01 05
DILUTION
100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000
UNITS
ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL ugL
BATCH
4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979 4979
DT DATETIME
042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651
In Description = Dry Ugt Page 20
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Ninber 200950 Date05152002
PROJECT L Ilaquo LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERSTCUSTOMER 0amp M INC
Customer Sample ID LttMOf-23n02 Laboratory Sample ID 200950-7
Date Sampled 04252002 CAampolgtlaquolo1 Date Received 04262002 Time Sampled 0945 Time Received 0910 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FUGS HDL RL DILUTION UNtTS BATCH DT DATETIME
Tetrachloroethene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 13-DIchIoropropane 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 DIbromochIoromethane 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 12-Dlbromoethane(EDB) 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 Chlorobenzene 003 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 1112-Tetrachloroethane 002 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 Ethylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 mampp-Xylenes 01 1 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 o-Xylene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 Styrene 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 Bromoform 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 Isopropylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 Bromobenzene 003 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651
O 1122-Tetrachloroethane 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 123-TrIchIoropropane 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 n-Propylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 2-Chlorotoluene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 135-Trlmethylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 4-Chlorotoluene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 tert-Butylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 124-Trlmethylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 sec-Butylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 13-Dichlorobenzene 08 J 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 p-Isopropyltoluene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 14-Dichlorobenzene 002 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 n-Sutylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 12-Dlchlorobenzerte 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 12-Dlbromo-3-cMoropropane 02 0S 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651 124-TrichIorobenzene 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 1651
In Description laquo Ory Wgt Page 21
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S
Job Nuober 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMER0amp INC PROJECT L RR LARDFILL atth david fuerst
customer Sanple ID bdl 4 OA 23 02shyDate Sampled 04252002 Time Sampled 0945
CA-poundOlVOjO
Laboratory Sample ID 200950-7 Date Received 04262002 Time Received 0910
Sanple Matrix Water
TEST METHOO PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS HDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH 0T DATETIME TECH
Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene 123-TrichIorobenzene i
01 04 004
05 05 05
100000 100000 100000
ugL ugL ugL
4979 4979 4979
042602 1651 042602 1651 042602 1651
pern pam pam
Page 22bull In Description deg Dry Ugt
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Kuifeer 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMER QrlJt INC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID TRIP BLANK-4-23-02 Laboratory Sanple ID 2009506 Date Sampled 04242002 Date Received 04252002 Time Sampled 0000 Time Received 0905 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGSr HDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME
8260B Volatile Organlcs DIchIorodlfIuoromethane 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 Chloromethane 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 Vinyl chloride 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 Bromomethane 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 Chloroethane 04 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 TrIchIorofIuoromethane 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 11-Dfchloroethene 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 Acetone UJ-3- 1 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 Methylene chloride 03 05 100000 iflL 4979 042602 16 trans-12-Dichloroethene 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16$ 11-Dichloroethane 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 22-DIchloropropane 03 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 cis-12-Dichloroethene 002 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 2-Butanone(NEK) 03 5 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 Bromochloromethane 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 Chloroform 003 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 111-TrIchloroethene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 11-Dlchloropropene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 Carbon tetrachloride 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 Benzene 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 12Dichloroethane 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 Trlehloroethene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 12-Dfehloropropane 005 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 Dibromomethane 04 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 Bromodlchloromethane 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 Toluene 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 112-Trichloroethane 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16
In Description deg Dry Ugt Page 17
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nuflber 200950 Date05152002
PROJECT L HI LANDFILLCUSTOMER IRC ATTHi DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID TRIP BLANK-4-23-02 Laboratory Sanple ID 200950-6 Date Sampled 04242002 Date Received 04252002 Time Sampled 0000 Time Received 0905 Sanple Matrix Water
TEST METHOO PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FUGS MDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME
Tetrachloroethene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 13-Dichloropropane 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 Dibromochloromethene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 12-Dfbromoethane(EDB) 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 Chlorobenzene 003 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 1112-Tetrachloroethane 002 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 Ethylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 mampp-Xylenes 01 1 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 o-Xylene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 Styrene 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 Bromofora 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 Isopropylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 Bromobenzene 003 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 1122-TetrachIoroethane 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 16042602123-Trichloropropane 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 16042602n-Propylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 164979 0426022-Chlorotoluene 01 05 100000itf ugL 4979 042602 16 135TrimethyIbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 4-Chlorotoluene c$i 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16S t tert-Butylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 124-Tr1methylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 sec-Butylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 13-Dichlorobenzene 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 p-1sopropyItoIuene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 14-DichIorobenzene 002 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 n-ftutylbenzene 01 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 12-Dichlorobenzene 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 12-Dibromo-3-chIoropropane 02 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16 124-TrichIorobenzene 004 05 100000 ugL 4979 042602 16
In Description raquo Dry Wgt Page 18
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 200950 Date05152002
CUSTOMER0amp M INC PROJECTIM LANDFILL ATTN OAVIO FUERST
Customer Sample ID TRIP BLANK-4-23-02 Laboratory Sample ID 200950-6 Date Sampled 04242002 Date Received 04252002 Time Sampled 0000 Time Received 0905 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METH00 PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS MDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
HexachLorobutadiene Naphthalene 123-TrichIorobenzene 1
campkW oi 04 004
05 05 05
10C300 100000 100000
ugL ugL ugL
4979 4979 4979
042602 1617 042602 1617 042602 1617
pant pam paffl
In Description Dry Ugt Page 19
356 FARRAGUT CROSSING DRrRILLIUM INC KNOXVILLE TN 37922Consultants in Environmental Chemistry
[423) 966-8880 FAX (423) 966-8885
cerik8ontrilliuminccom
June 282002
Mr Dave Fuerst OampM Inc 540 Hopmeadow Street Simsbury CT 06070
RE Data Package Review Report - STL Connecticut Report No 200943 - Wet Chemistry Parameters in Water
Dear Dave
I have completed my evaluation of the wet chemistry analysis data prepared by the Severn Trent Laboratory in Shelton Connecticut (STL Connecticut) for three water samples from the LampRR Site which were reported in a single data package under Report No 200943 The data package was received by Trillium for reviewon May 162002 with additional information provided on June 262002 The following samples were reported
MW-103A-042302 MW-201-042302 MW-202-042302
Analyses were performed accordingto EPAMethod3000 (chlorideEPA1993 Rev1997) EPA Method 4051 (BOD Methodsfor Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes [EPA-6004-79shy020383]) EPAMethod 4104 (COD Methodsfor Chemical Analysisof Water and Wastes[EPAshy6004-79-020 383]) and EPA 3501 (ammonia Methodsfor Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes [EPA-6004-79-020383]) All three of the samples were analyzed for all four parameters My evaluationwas based onthe specificationsof theproject-specific Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP 996) the referenced methods and to the extent applicable the USEPA Region I Laboratory Data Validation Functional Guidelinesfor EvaluatingInorganicsAnalyses (688Rev 289) Qualifiers consistent with those defined in the Region I document were applied as necessary and appropriate
No raw sample data were initially provided in the data package However in responseto the evaluators request for missing summary data all supporting raw data were provided by the laboratory These raw data were not reviewed by Trillium as part ofthis evaluation As specified
HOME OFFICE 28 GRACES DRIVE bull COATESVILLE PA19320 bull (610)383-7233 bull FAX (610) 383-7907
OFFICES IN LOUISIANA bull MARYLAND bull NEW JERSEY bull NORTH CAROLINA bull PENNSYLVANIA bull TENNESSEE bull TEXAS
TRILLIUMBC
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Connecticut Report No 200943 (Wet Chemistry Parameters in Water) June 282002 Page 2 of 5
in Section 92 of the QAPP (page 23) a Level ID evaluation limited to an overview of the quality control results was performed
Based on the evaluation sample results were qualified as follows
bull Results for ammonia and COD in MW-103A-042302 MW-201-042302 andMWshy202-042302 were qualifiedasestimated (JUJ) dueto lack ofdocumented samplepH values to verify appropriate preservation on receipt at the laboratory
bull The result for BOD in MW-103A-042302 was qualified as less than the laboratory-specified reporting limit (20 mgL U) based on lack of confirmation at a low concentration in the laboratory duplicate analysis
bull The result for BOD in MW-202-042302 was qualified as estimated (J) because it is less than twice the laboratory-specified method detection limit
All Bqualifiers applied by the laboratory were removed by the evaluator
Based on professional judgment the evaluator recommends that the data user consider only the reporting limits (rather than the method detection limits which are also included on the sample results forms) as the less than values associated with all non-detected results
At the discretion of the data user the following points may warrant attention by laboratory personnel with regard to this data package and prior to future sampling events at this site
bull Documentation of sample pHs at the time of laboratoiy receipt directly on all chain of custody records
bull Documentation of correlation coefficients for all applicable initial calibrations
Specific details regarding the review and evaluation of these data are discussed below
Holding Timesf Preservation and Sample Integrity A copy of the applicable chain of custody (COC) record was included in the data package documenting a sample collection date of42302 Physical preservation of the samples with ice was not recorded by the sampler but an acceptable temperature (24degC) on laboratoiy receipt was documented on the COC
Acidification of the samples for ammonia and COD analyses with sulfuric acid was recorded by the sampler on the COC However sample pHs on receipt at the laboratory were not recorded on the
^TRILLIUMme
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Connecticut Report No 200943 (Wet Chemistry Parameters in Water) June 282002 Page 3 of5
COC by STL ConnecticutSTLCT PreservativeRecords were also not included inthe datapackage as received for evaluation They were requested by the evaluator on 62002 On 62502 the laboratory responded that they could not locate the preservative record for this data set and that no documentation of pHs for the samples intended for analysis of ammonia and COD was available Therefore adequate chemical preservation of these samples could not be verified and results for ammonia and COD in MW-103A-042302 MW-201-042302 and MW-202-042302 were qualified as estimated (J UJ) on this basis
All sample analysesfor chlorideCOD and ammoniawere performed within the 28-dayholding time specified by the QAPP for these parameters BOD incubation was initiated on 42502 for all applicable samples this is within the required 48-hour holding time for all three samples
Calibrations Chloride analyses were performed according to EPA 3000 (ion chromatography) Based on the summary form initial calibration(05-50 mgL) was performed on 42502 at thestart of the analysis series during which the samples were run However no correlation coefficient was documented in the data package for thisIC At the request of the evaluatorthe laboratory provided documentation of an acceptable correlation coefficient (gt0995) for the 42502 IC on 62602 Based on the analysis times on the summary form initial and continuing calibration verification (ICVCCV) standards were run at appropriate frequencies throughout the chloride analysis series and all recoveries were acceptable (QC 85-115) as reported on the summary form
Ammonia analyseswere performed according toEPA 3501in asingle analysisseries on 42902No evidence of initial calibration was documented on the summary form received for review At the request of the evaluator the laboratory provided documentation showing that initial calibration for ammonia was performed at the start of the analysis series and that a calibration range of 004 mgL to 40mgL was established Acceptablecorrelation coefficientsfor two segmentsof thiscurve (004 mgL to 10 mgL and 10 mgL to 40 mgL) were also documented in this additionally-submitted documentation Based on the analysis timeson the summary form ICVCCV standards were run at appropriate frequencies throughout the ammoniaanalysis series Allrecoveries wereacceptable (QC 85-115) as reported on the summary form
COD analyses were performed according to EPA 4104 in a single analysis series on 5602 Initial calibration (10-150 mgL) was performed at the start of theseries but no correlation coefficient was documented in the data package At the request of the evaluator the laboratory provided documentation of an acceptablecorrelation coefficient for this IC on62602 Based on the analysis timeson thesummary form ICVCCV standardswere run at appropriate frequencies throughout the COD analysis series All recoveries were acceptable (QC 85-115) as reported on the summary form
frRILLIUMMC
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Connecticut Report No 200943 (Wet Chemistry Parameters in Water) June 28 2002 Page 4 of 5
Calibration is not applicable to the BOD analyses which were performed by titration
Blanks Method blank results were reported for ammonia COD chloride and BOD on summary forms in the data package no contamination was reported above the laboratory-specified method detection limit (MDL) in any of these blanks
Initial and continuing calibration blanks (ICBCCBs) were run at the appropriate frequencies for ammonia COD and chloride Based on the summary forms provided for review no contamination was detected in any of these blanks
Laboratory Control Samples Results for laboratory control samples (LCSs) analyzed with the samples for COD ammonia and chloride were reported on summary forms in the data package Acceptable recoveries (97-104) were reported for all three parameters
No LCS was reported for BOD
Duplicate Analysis Unspiked duplicate analyses of MW-103A-042302 were performed for COD and BOD COD was not detected in either sample analysis therefore no quantitative evaluation of precision could be made for this parameter using these data
BOD was reported in MW-103A-042302 (045 mgL) but was not found (012 mgL U) in the laboratory duplicate analysisof this sampleSince the positive result for BOD in MW-103A-042302 is greater than the MDL but less than the applicablereporting limit (RL) it was qualified as less than the RL based on this lack of confirmation (20 mgL U)
MatrixSpikeAnalysis Sample MW-103A-042302 was prepared andanalyzed asa matrix spikefor COD and BODAcceptable recoveries(QC 75-125)were reported forboth parameters(101 and 105 respectively)
Sample Results Sample results greater than or equal to the laboratory-specified MDLs for ammonia COD chloride and BOD were reported on the Laboratory Test Results forms for all samples BothMDLsand laboratory-specified RLsare documentedon theseforms Resultsfor BOD in MW-103A-042302 and MW-202-042302 were greater than the MDL but less than the RL and were qualified asB by thelaboratory The reportedBOD concentration inMW-202-042302 is less than twice the MDL therefore this result was qualified as estimated (J) based on professional judgment The result for BOD in MW-103A-042302 was previously qualified based on laboratory duplicate results and no further action was necessary Both B qualifiers applied by the laboratory were removed All other reported sample results were greater than the laboratory-specified RLs
TRILLIUM
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Connecticut Report No 200943 (Wet Chemistry Parameters in Water) June 282002 Page 5 of 5
No documentation supporting the MDLs was provided in the data package RLs for chloride ammonia and COD are equal to or greater than the lowest IC standard analyzed in association with the site samples Based on professional judgment the evaluator recommends that the data user consider only the RLs as the less than values associated with all non-detected results
According to the Laboratory Test Results forms no dilutions were performed on any of these samples for any of the analysisparameters This isacceptable based on the reported concentrations
Field Duplicates No field duplicate pair was identified in this data package
Documentation A COCrecord provided in thedata package included allreported samples and was properly completed except that no shipment information was recorded Both the courier name and the applicable airbill number should be recorded on all COCs
Summary IC data for chloride ammonia and COD were incomplete as provided in the initial data package received for review In response to the evaluators request for the missing information the laboratory provided foil supporting raw data for all analysis parameters These data were added to the data package behind the originally provided summary pages by the evaluator
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this data package review report
Sincerely
CM) mdash
Carol A Erikson Quality Assessment Manager
CAEpac April 2002Wet Chem2 (95406)
fTRILLIUMc
ATTACHMENTA
LABORATORYTESTRESULTS
STLConnecticutReportNo200943
EPA Region Qualifier Definitions
U- The material was analyzed for but was not detected above the level ofthe
associated value Theassociated valueis eitherthesamplequantitation limit or
thesampledetection limit
J - Theassociated numericalvalue is an estimated quantity
R - Thedataareunusable(Note Analyte mayormay not be present)
UJ - Thematerialwasanalyzed forbutwasnotdetected Theassociated valueis an
estimateand may beinaccurateorimprecise
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 200943 Date05082002
CUSTOMER0amp H INC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID MW-103A-042302 Laboratory Sample ID 200943-1 Date Sampled 04232002 Date Received 04242002 Time Sanpled 1100 Time Received 1005 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLERESULT FLAGS MDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
3000 Ion Chromatography Analysis Chloride 30 0084 10 mgL 5039 042602 0347 ddm
4051
3501
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD 5 day) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (80D5)
Nitrogen Annonia as N (ColAutPhen) Anmonia (NH3) as N ND
(A
uuf
I I
012
0029
20
0040
mgL
mgL
5080
5003
042502 1116
042902 1209
dtn
JOS
CD 4104 Chemical Oxygen Demand pound Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) ND 360 100 mgL 5204 050602 1204 nev
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 2
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 200943 Date05082002
CUSTOMER O amp H INC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID MU-201-042302 Laboratory Sample ID 200943gt2 Date Sanpled 04232002 Date Received 04242002 Time Sampled 1100 Time Received 1005 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FUGS KgtL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
3000 Ion Chromatography Analysis Chloride 19 0084 10 mgL 5039 042602 0406 ddm
4051 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOO 5 day) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) ND k 012 20 mgL 5080 042502 1140 dtn
3501 Nitrogen Ammonia as N (ColAutPhen) Ammonia (NH3) as N ND t 0029 0040 mgL 5003 042902 1210 JOS
ltki 4104 Chemical Oxygen Demand
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COO) 115 s 360 100 mgL 5204 050602 1220 nev
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 3
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nunber 200943 Date05Q82002
CUSTOMER0amp M INC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID KU-202-042302 Laboratory Sample ID 2009433 Date Sampled 04232002 Date Received 04242002 Time Sampled 1100 Time Received 1005 Sample Matrix Water
TEST KETHOO PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS KDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
3000 Ion Chromatography Analysis Chloride 19 0084 10 mgL 5039 042602 0425 ddm
4051 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD 5 day) is-Biochemical Oxygen Demand (B005) 015 S 012 20 mgL 5080 042502 1148 dtn
3501 Nitrogen Anmonia as N (ColAutPhen)
O 4104
Ammonia (NH3) as N
Chemical Oxygen Demand Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
ND
139
t t J
r 1 e
0029
360
0040
100
mgL
mgL
5003
5204
042902 1211
050602 1226
jos
0
c c
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 4
INC 356 FARRAGUT CROSSING DRrRILLIUM KNOXVILLE TN 37922Consultants in Environmental Chemistry
(423) 966-8880 FAX [423) 966-8885
ceriksontrilliuminccom
June 262002
Mr Dave Fuerst OampM Inc 540 Hopmeadow Street Simsbury CT 06070
RE Data Package Review Report - STL Connecticut Report No 200943 - Total Iron in Water
Dear Dave
I have completed my evaluation of the inorganics analysis data (total iron) prepared by the Severn Trent Laboratory (STL) in Shelton Connecticut for three water samples from the LampRR Site These data were reported in asingle data package under STL Connecticut Report No 200943 which wasreceived byTrillium for reviewon May 162002with additional documentationprovided on June 262002 The following samples were reported
MW-103A-042302 MW-201-042302 MW-202-042302
Analyses were performedaccording to EPA Method6010Bthis method is found in the Third EditionofSW-846 Update IDMy evaluation wasbased onthe specificationsof the project-specific Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP 996) the referenced methods and the USEPA Region I Laboratory Data Validation FunctionalGuidelinesfor EvaluatingInorganicsAnalyses (688Rev 289) Qualifiers consistent with those defined in the Region I document were applied as necessary and appropriate
As specified in Section 92 of the QAPP (page 23) a Level III evaluation limited to an overview of the information provided on the summary forms was performed No raw data were included in the data package
Based on the evaluation all sample results were determined to be valid as reported No qualifiers were applied to these data by the evaluator
HOME OFFICE 28 GRACES DRIVE bull COATESVILLE PA19320 bull (610)383-7233 bull FAX (610) 383-7907
OFFICES IN LOUISIANA bull MARYLAND bull NEW JERSEY bull NORTH CAROLINA bull PENNSYLVANIA bull TENNESSEE bull TEXAS
TRILLIUMM
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Connecticut Report No 200943 (Total Iron in Water) June 262002 Pace 2 of 4
Based on professional judgment the evaluator recommends that the data user consider only the reporting limit (rather than the method detection limit which is also reported by the laboratory) as the less than value associated with the non-detected sample result for MW-103A-042302
Laboratory Test Results forms for all samples are included as Attachment A to this report Region I qualifier definitions are also provided in this attachment
At the discretion of the data user the following points may warrant attention by laboratory personnel with regard to this data package andor prior to future sampling events at this site
bull Sample pHs on laboratory receipt should be documented directly on all chain of custody records
bull Documentation supporting the specified method detection limits (MDLs) should be included in the data package (ie similar to a CLP Form X)
Specific details regarding the review and evaluation of these data are discussed below
Holding Times Preservation and Sample Integrity A copy of the applicable chain of custody (COC) record was included in the data package documenting a sample collection date of42302 Physical preservation of the samples with ice was not recorded by the sampler but an acceptable temperature (24degC QC 4degC plusmn 2 degC) on laboratory receipt was documented on the COC
Acidification of thesamples for totaliron analysis withnitric acid was recorded by thesampler onthe COC However sample pHs on receipt at the laboratory were not recorded by STL Connecticut on the COC STLCT Preservative Records were also not included in the data package as received for evaluation They were requested by the evaluator on 62002 On 62502 the laboratory responded that they could not locate the Preservative Record for this data set Instead they offered a copy of the metals digestion log which was received via FedEx on 62602 This record documented acceptable pHs (lt2) for all samples inthis data setand no further action was necessary onthis basis
Total iron analyses were performedon 5102 wellwithin the 6-month holding time specified bythe QAPP
Calibrations Based on the analysis dates and times provided on the summary forms initial and continuing calibration verification (ICVCCV) standards were run at appropriate frequencies throughout the applicable ICP (inductively coupled plasma) analysis serieson 5102 A11ICVCCV recoveries documented on the summary forms were acceptable (QC 90-110)
^frRILLIUNLc
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Connecticut Report No 200943 (Total Iron in Water) June 262002 Page 3 of 4
BlanksBased onthe analysisdatesand times provided onthe summary forms initial andcontinuing calibration blanks (ICBCCBs) were run at appropriate frequencies throughout the 5102 ICP analysis series Iron was not reported above the laboratory-specified method detection limit (MDL) in any of the ICBCCBs
A water-matrix method blank (MB) was also analyzed for total iron No iron contamination was reported in this MB
Interference Check Samples Results for two interference check sample pairs one pair analyzed at the beginning and one at theend of the applicableanalysis series were reported in the datapackage Acceptable recoveries (QC 80-120) were reported for iron in all of these quality controlanalyses
Laboratory Control Samples Results for a laboratory control sample analyzed for total iron with this sample set were reported in the data package An acceptable recovery (101 QC 80-120) was reported
Duplicate Analysis Duplicate resultsfor a non-project sample were reported in this data package These data are not relevant to the site samples for this project and were not evaluated
Matrix Spike Analysis Matrix spike results for a non-project sample were reported in this data package These data are not relevant to the site samples for this project and were not evaluated
SerialDilution Serial dilution analysis was performed on sample MW-201-042302 However the undiluted concentration of total iron in thissample was lessthan 50x thelaboratory-specified MDL Therefore no useful quality control information was obtained from this analysis
Sample Results No documentation to support the laboratory-specified MDL for total iron (853 mgL) or the date on which it was established was provided in the data package A reporting limit (RL) of200 pgL was also specified on eachof the LaboratoryTest Results forms Two ofthe three reported sample results were greater than the laboratory-specified RL Based on professional judgment the evaluator recommendsthat the data user consider onlythe RL asthe less thanvalue associated with the non-detected sample result for MW-103A-042302
Field Duplicates No field duplicate pair was included in this data set
Total versus Dissolved Concentrations Analyses for dissolved iron were not performed on these samples
Documentation A COC record provided inthe data package included allreported samplesand was properly completed except that no shipment information was recorded Both the courier name and the applicable airbill number should be recorded on all COCs
^fTRILLIUMINc
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Connecticut Report No 200943 (Total Iron in Water) June 262002 Page 4 of 4
The sample digestion log was provided on 62602 via FedEx at the request of the evaluator This document was inserted into the data package as page 64A
Pages 61-64 of the data package are summary forms for fourSTD analysis all of which were run at the start of the applicable analysis series and were ND for iron These runs have no apparent relevance to the sample results in this data set and were not further considered in the evaluation
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this data package review report
Sincerely
Carol A Erikson Quality Assessment Manager
CAEdas April 2002Total Iron2 (95406)
TRILLIUM
ATTACHMENT A
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS STL Connecticut Report No 200943
EPA Region IQualifier Definitions
U - The material was analyzed for but was not detected above the level of the associated value The associated value is either the sample quantitation limit or the sample detection limit
J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity
R - The data are unusable (Note Analyte may or may not be present)
UJ - The material was analyzed for but was not detected The associated value is an estimate and may be inaccurate or imprecise
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 200943 Date05102002
CUSTOMER0amp M1NC PROJECTL RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID HU-103A-042302 Laboratory Sample ID 200943-1 Date Sampled 04232002 Date Received 04242002 Time Sampled 1100 Time Received 1005 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS HDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
6010B Metals Analysis(ICAP Trace) Iron ND 853 200 ugL 5083 050102 1215 nnp
CD
bullj
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 2
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nunber 200943 Date05102002
CUSTOMER0ampINC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID KU-201-042302 Laboratory Sample ID 200943-2 Date Sampled 04232002 Date Received 04242002 Time Sampled 1100 Time Received 1005 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOO PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS MDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH 0T DATETIME TECH
6010B Metals Analysis (ICAP Trace) Iron 247 853 200 ugL 5083 050102 1227 nnp
D
In Description = Dry Ugt Page 3
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 200943 Date05102002
CUSTOMER04MINC PROJECT LRRLANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID MW-202-042302 Laboratory Sample ID 200943-3 Date Sampled 04232002 Date Received 04242002 Time Sampled 1100 Time Received 1005 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS MDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
6010B Metals Analysis (ICAP Trace) Iron 788 853 200 ugL 5083 050102 1245 nnp
C J
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 4
356 FARRAGUT CROSSING DRrRILLIUM INC KNQXVILLE TN 37922
Consultants in Environmental Chemistry (423] 966-8880
FAX (423) 966-8885 cerik8ontrilliuminccom
August 14 2002
Mr Dave Fuerst OampM Inc 540 Hopmeadow Street Simsbury CT 06070
RE Data Package Review Report - STL Connecticut Report 200943STLChicago Job No 209496 - Total and Dissolved Arsenic and Lead in Water
Dear Dave
1have completedmy evaluationof the inorganicsanalysis dataprepared by the SevernTrent Laboratory(STL) in UniversityParkIllinois(STL Chicagounder subcontractto STL Connecticut) for three water samples from the LampRR Site These data were reported in a single data package under STL Chicago JobNo 209496 (STLConnecticut Report No 200943) which was received by Trillium for review on May 162002 with a revised data package provided on August 12002 and additional information provided on August 62002 The following samples were reported
MW-103A-042302 MW-201-042302 MW-202-042302
Analyses wereperformed accordingtoEPA Methods7060A (totaland dissolvedarsenic)and 7421A (total and dissolved lead) both methods are found in the Third Edition of SW-846 Update m My evaluation wasbased on thespecifications of the project-specificQuality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP 996) the referenced methods and the USEPA Region I Laboratory Data Validation Functional Guidelinesfor Evaluating Inorganics Analyses (688 Rev289) Qualifiers consistent with those defined in the Region I document were applied as necessary and appropriate
Althoughthe QAPP specifiesthat Level IIIdata packagesare requiredfor allanalysesexcept the 5-yearsampling eventsraw datadeliverables (ie GFAA instrument print-outs) wereprovided in the data package submitted on 51602 for all of the metals analyses Unless otherwise noted these raw data were not reviewed by Trillium as part ofthis evaluation Resubmissions received on 8102 and 8602 did not contain raw data printouts As specified in Section 92 of the QAPP (page23)a LevelHI evaluationlimited to anoverviewof theinformation provided on thesummary forms was performed
HOME OFFICE 28 GRACES DRIVE bull COATESVILLE PA19320 bull (610)383-7233 bull FAX (610) 383-7907
OFFICES IN LOUISIANA bull MARYLAND bull NEW JERSEY bull NORTH CAROLINA bull PENNSYLVANIA bull TENNESSEE bull TEXAS
TRILLIUMbdquoe
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation ofSTL Connecticut No 200943 STL Chicago No 209496 (AsPb in Water) August 142002 Page 2 of 6 ___
The additional data provided on 8102 and 8602 included recalculations of the original analysisdataas wellas re-analysisdata Exceptwhere otherwise notedonly the8102and8602 data submissions were the subject of this evaluation effort
Based on the evaluation the following qualifier was applied
bull The resultfordissolved lead inMW-201-042302 wasqualified asestimated (UJ)due to an unacceptably low post digestion spike recovery
This qualifier is reflected on the applicable Laboratory Test Results form in Attachment A to this report Region I qualifier definitions are also provided in this attachment
Details regarding the review and evaluation of these data are discussed below
Holding Times Preservation andSample Integrity A Subcontracting RequisitionForm served as thechain of custody (COC)documenting shipment of thesamples by STL Connecticut on5202 and their receipt at STL Chicago on 5302 and was included only in the original data package submitted for evaluation No documentation ofsample preservation was found on this form but an entry of 23 degC in the Special Instructions field appeared to be a cooler temperature on receipt at STLChicago Acopyof the field COC record was also included inthe original STLChicago data package A sample collection date of 42302 was documented on both the field COC and the requisition form Physical preservation of the samples with ice was not recorded on the field COC by the sampler although an acceptable temperature (24degC) on receipt at STL Connecticut was documented on that COC record
Acidification of the samplesfor metals analysiswith nitric acid was recorded by the sampler on the field COC but sample pHs on receipt were not recorded by STL Connecticut on the field COC and acidification was not documented by either laboratory on the requisition form Historically documentation of sample pHs has been found on the Sample Receipt Preservation Log prepared at STL Connecticut however this record was not included in the STL Connecticut data package as received for evaluation and could not be located for this data set when requested by the evaluator Sample digestion logs included in the STLChicago data package did not include documentation of sample pHs The only documentation of chemical preservation for the metals samples sent to STL Chicago is a notation ofthe Sample Receipt ChecklistReport which statessimply that the samples were correctly preserved Based on conversations with STL Chicago personnel this is the only documentation of acceptable chemical preservation that they routinely generate on sample receipt In accordance with their standard operating procedure if any sample is found to be at an unacceptable pH the discrepancy and subsequent corrective action is documented but acceptable sample pHs are not specifically recorded For the purposes of this evaluation it was assumed that
the checklist notationwas accurateand thatacceptable pHswere infact measured bySTL Chicago for all samples No further action was taken on this basis
^ TOILLIUM
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation ofSTL Connecticut No 200943 STL Chicago No 209496 (AsPb in Water) August 142002 Page 3 of 6
Analyses for total anddissolved arsenic and lead were performed 58-902 and 71102 well within the 6-month holding time specified by the QAPP
Calibrations The original arsenic analyses were performed on an instrument identified as AA4 in two analysis series on 5802 The samples were analyzed for lead on AA8 in an analysis series on 5802 and a second serieson 5902 Based on the analysis datesand times provided on thequality control (QC) summary forms initial and continuing calibration verification (ICVCCV) standards were run at appropriate frequencies throughout all of the original GFAA (graphite furnace atomic absorption) analysis series All ICVCCV recoveries documented on the summary forms were acceptable (QC 90-110)
Linearity checkresults (ie correlationcoefficientsfor theinitial multipointcalibrations) forarsenic and lead by GFAA were not provided on the summary forms but were documented in the raw data included in the originaldata package submitted forreview This information was located andnoted by theevaluator Acceptablecorrelation coefficients(gt0995) were reported for allfour documented initial calibrations(ICs) which includeda blankand five standard concentrations (2103050and 70 pgL) for arsenic and a blank and five standard concentrations (232050 and 70 pgL) for lead However in both arsenic ICs the concentration of the lowest standard used (true value = 2 pgL)measured againsttheassociated IC wasunacceptably low(071 pgL and084 pgLQC plusmn10 of true value basedon professional judgment)This indicatesa low biasat thelow end ofthe curve and suggeststhe possibilityof reporting false negativesor positiveresults that are biased lowAt the request of the evaluator the laboratory dropped the highest concentration standard run for arsenic (70 pgL) in each IC and recalculated all sample results against the modified curve Although measured concentrationsfor thelow standardwere significantlyimproved forarsenic they werestill unacceptably low (145 pgL and 147pgL)
Because the recalculated arsenic curves were still unacceptable at the low end the laboratory reshyanalyzed all of the samplesfor total and dissolved arsenic in asingle series on AA4on 71102 An acceptable correlation coefficient was reported for the IC performed on this date which included a blank and six standard concentrations (2 5 10 30 50 and 70 pgL) The concentration of the 2 pgL standard as measured against this IC was acceptable (202 pgL) Based on the analysis dates and times provided on the QC summary forms ICVCCV standards were run at appropriate frequencies throughout the arsenic re-analysisseries All ICVCCV recoveries documented on the summary forms were acceptable (QC 90-110) All sample results for total and dissolved arsenic were reported from these re-analyses and no further action was warranted
Measured concentrations of the lowest standard run for lead (true value = 2 pgL) against the associated ICs (179 pgL and 183 pgL) were just within the evaluator-established acceptance limits but sample results for thiselement were alsorecalculated by the laboratoryafter dropping the 70 pgL standard from each IC Measured concentrations ofthe lowconcentration standards in both
TRILLIUMraquo
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Connecticut No 200943 STL Chicago No 209496 (AsPb in Water) August 142002 Pace 4 of 6
recalculated ICs (190 pgL and 202 pgL) were much closer to the true value All sample results for lead were reported from the recalculated data and no further action was warranted
Contract required detection limit (CRDL) standards run at the beginning of each relevant analysis series (5802 and 5902 for lead and 71102 for arsenic) gave acceptable recoveries (102-113 QC 80-120)
Blanks Based on the analysis dates and times provided on the summary forms initial and continuing calibrationblanks (ICBCCBs)were runat appropriate frequencies throughout the three relevant sample analysis series No concentrations of arsenic or lead above the applicable method detection limits (MDLs) or below the negative MDLs were reported in any of the ICBCCBs
A water-matrix preparation blank was digested with the samplesfor each targetanalyte Noarsenic or lead contamination was reported in the preparation blank which was re-analyzed on 71102 for arsenic with the associated samples
Laboratory Control Samples Laboratorycontrol sample resultsfor arsenic werereported from the original analysis series only as calculated against both the original and modified ICs The recalculated recovery was acceptable(105 QC 80-120)The laboratorycontrol sample was not re-analyzed for arsenic
The recalculated laboratory control sample result for lead (113) was acceptable
Duplicate Analysis None of the samples from this data set were analyzed in duplicate by the laboratory
MatrixSpike Analysis Matrix spike analyses were not performed on any of the samples from this data set
Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption (GFAA) QC Post-digestion spike (PDS) recoveries for arsenicand leadwere reported ontheQC summaryforms and wereacceptable (QC85-115)except for dissolved lead in MW-201-042302 (836) The result for dissolved lead in MW-201-042302 was qualified as estimated (UJ) on this basis
No method of standard addition analyses were performed
Sample Results No results greater than or equal to the laboratory-specified MDLs were reported from the relevant analyses for arsenic and lead in any of the samples in this data set
^TRULIUMtrade
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation ofSTL Connecticut No 200943 STL Chicago No 209496 (AsPb in Water) August 142002 Pace 5 of 6
All undetected sample results for arsenic and lead were correctly adjusted (multiplied by 05) to reflect the concentration factor resulting from processing 50 mL of sample to a final volume of 25 mL which was clearly documented on the laboratorys digestion logs
Form X documentation of MDLs for arsenic and lead was not provided in the data package therefore the date on which these values were established is not known MDLs for both target elements were documented on the Laboratory Test Results forms since they are different for die original and rerun arsenic analyses it would appear that they were re-established (for arsenic at least) between Mayand July of2002The laboratory-reported sampleresults and thequality control summary form results reflected the applicable MDLs from the Laboratory Test Resultsforms in all cases and no action was taken on this basis
Field Duplicates No field duplicate sample was identified in this data set
Total versus Dissolved Concentrations Comparison of total versus dissolved results for lead and arsenic in theground watersamplesrevealed nocases where thedissolved concentration washigher than the total concentration
Documentation Original data package documentation was inconsistent with the specifications of the QAPP specifically a Level IV package was provided when a Level III package was required Pursuant to the validation specificationsfor thisproject theadditional raw data documentationwas not reviewed by Trillium as part of thisevaluation except where otherwise noted inthis reportThe revised data submitted for review on 8102 and 8602 included summary forms only consistent with the QAPP specifications
Where applicableboth recalculatedoriginal and re-analysisresults wereincluded onthe Laboratory Test Results forms for the site samples As previously discussed only the re-analysis results for arsenic should be used Therefore for the sake of clarity the original analysis results for total and dissolved arsenic in all three site samples were deleted from the Laboratory Test Results forms by the evaluator
QC summary forms in the revised data package provided on 8102 did not include documentation of linearity(ICs)On request STLChicago providedlinear regressionspreadsheets on 8602 which included all pertinentdata for eachIC andlisted theassociated sample responses and final reportable results These were incorporated into the revised data package received on 8102 by the evaluator Since COC records sample receipt checklists and digestion logs are only available in the original data packageboth datapackagesmust be maintainedin the file to ensure thataccurate and complete documentation is available for future reference
The QCsummaryforms in the revised data packageprovided on8102 includedanentry forthe low concentration IC standard ineach seriesIn everycase the reportedresult wasMDL Uindicating
^fjRILLIUM
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation ofSTL Connecticut No 200943 STL Chicago No 209496 (AsPb in Water) August 142002 Page 6 of 6
(incorrectly) that the analyte wasnot detected at this concentration Based onthe data found on the linear regression spreadsheets theevaluator corrected all of the low concentration standard entries on the QC summary forms to reflect the actual measured concentrations
Subcontracting requisition formsused as COCrecords were provided inthe data packageincluded all reported samples and were properly completed except that sample preservation was not clearly documented by either laboratory Thisinformation should always be documentedon the applicable COC record(s)
The QC summary forms provided in the data package did not differentiate between total and dissolved arsenic and lead analyses Based on the laboratorys own run logs which were provided in theoriginal datapackageand thelinear regressionspreadsheets providedon 8602 bothof which includedDandTsuffixestheevaluator wasable to differentiatebetween thetotal anddissolved sample analyses This information was transcribed to each of the quality control summary reports in therevised datapackage bythe evaluator toensure that accurateinformation isavailable for fiiture reference
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this data package review report
Sincerely
(aM$ mdash
Carol A Erikson Quality Assessment Manager
CAEpsn April 2002Metals2 (95406)
^fjRILLIUM
ATTACHMENT A
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS STL Chicago Job No 209496
EPA Region I Qualifier Definitions
U - The material was analyzed for but was not detected above the level of the associated value The associated value iseither thesample quantitation limit or the sample detection limit
J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity
R - The data are unusable (Note Analyte may or may not be present)
UJ - The materialwas analyzedfor butwas not detected The associatedvalue is an estimate and may be inaccurate or imprecise
SE V E R N
T R E NT S E R V I C E S
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nunber 209496 Date072S2002
CUSTOMER Severn Trent laboratories PROJECT0 GROUNDWATER ATTN PautHobart
Customer Sample ID 200943-01 Laboratory Sample ID 209496-1bull lOiA-
Date Sampled 04232002 Date Received 05032002 Time Sanpled 1100 Mvl Time Received 1030 Sample Matrix Water
QnUlrioi-
TEST KETHOO PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS MDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
7060A Arsenic (GFAA) t i Arsenii JU9Q- 090 -UQ- ugL 51336 050802 1104 daj-Arsenic 1 0 10 10 ugL 56707 RA 071102 1532 daj
7421 Lead(GFAA) Lead 10 10 10 ugL 51274 050802 2318 daj
7060A Arsenic(GFAA)
Jlrsenicf -U2r -OrGO- -WO- bullugL S1336 050803 1349 dej Arsenic Diss 10 10 10 ugL 56707 RA 071102 1543 daj
7421 Lead(GFAA) Lead Diss 10 1 0 1 0 ugL 51492 050902 2000 daj
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 2
STI J17
SE V li-R N
T R E NT S L K V I C L S
Job Nunfcer 209496 L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S
Date07252002
CUSTWKSevem Trent Laboratofies PROJECT0H GROUNDWATER ATTN Paul Robert
Customer Sample ID 20094302 Date Sampled 04232002 ftf Time Sampled 1330 Sample Matrix Water
WJ-0 a- Laboratory Sample ID 209496-2
Date Received 05032002 Time Received 1030
TEST jHETHOO PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS icopyL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
7060A Arsenic (GFAA) Arsenic Arsenic
-0 0shy10
090 10
-ML 10
ugL ugL
51336 56707
050802 1115 RA 071102 1452
daj daj
OA
7421 Lead (GFAA) Lead 10 10 1 0 ugL 51274 050802 2343 daj
7060A Arsenic (GFAA) ArsenicrSiesraquo Arsenic Diss
-090shy10
-090shy10
ML 10
ugL ugL
51526 56707
050802 1401 RA 071102 1555
daj6 daj(
7421 Lead (GFAA) Lead Diss 10
n
10 10 ugL 51492 050902 2025 daj
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 3
STiAI irnrnm
SE VERN
TRENT bullbullbull S E R V I C E S
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 209496 Date07252002
CUSTOMER SeVernrTreht Laboratories PROJECT O H GROUNDWATER ATTN Paul Robert
Customer Sample ID 200943-03 Laboratory Sample ID 209496-3 Date Sampled04232002 Date Received 05032002 Time Sampled 1445 Time Received 1030 Sample Matrix Water amp6tltrior
TESTMETHOO PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FUGS HDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
7060A Arsenic (GFAA) Arsenic -090- 000 10 ugA 51326 050802 1338 daj Arsenic 10 1 0 10 ugL 56707 RA 071102 1504 daj
7421 Lead(GFAA) Lead 10 10 10 ugL 51274 050802 2356 daj
7060A Arsenic (GFAA) 6 Aroonicj Dioci -9rOO- 090 bull49- ugL 51326 050802 VMS dai Arsenic Diss 10 10 1 0 ugL 56707 RA 071102 1606 dajw
7421 Lead (GFAA) Lead Diss 10 1 0 10 ugL 51492 050902 2038 daj
In Description = Dry Ugt Page 4
sti -laquoi iwont
356 FARRAGUT CROSSING DRrRILLIUM INC KN0XV1LIE TN 37922Consultants in Environmental Chemistry
(423] 966-8880 FAX (423) 966-8885
ceriteont7illiuminccom
August 142002
Mr Dave Fuerst OampM Inc 540 Hopmeadow Street Simsbury CT 06070
RE Data Packape Review Report -STL Connecticut Report 200950STL ChicagoJob No 209497 - Total and Dissolved Arsenic and Lead in Water
Dear Dave
I have completed myevaluation of theinorganics analysisdata prepared by theSevern Trent Laboratory(STL) in UniversityParkIllinois(STLChicago undersubcontract toSTL Connecticut) for 12 ground and surface water samplesfrom the LampRR Site These data were reported in asingle data packageunder STL ChicagoJob No209497 (STL ConnecticutReport No200950) which was received by Trillium for review on May 162002 with a revised data package provided on August 1 2002 and additional information provided on August 6 2002 Hie following samples were reported
Ground Waters (GWs) MW-CW-5B-4-23-02 MW-102A-4-23-02 MW-104A-4-23-02 MW-CW-7A-4-23-02 MW-DUP1-04-23-02
Surface Waters (SWs) LCH-4-042302 SW-10-042302 SW-8-042302 LCH-3-042302 SW-16-042302 SW-5-042302 SW-DUP-042302
Analyses wereperformed accordingto EPAMethods7060A(total anddissolved arsenic) and 7421A (total and dissolved lead) both methods are found in the Third Edition of SW-846 Update m The GWsamples were analyzed fortotal anddissolved arsenicand total and dissolvedlead The SW samples were analyzed for total and dissolved arsenic only My evaluation was based on the specifications of the project-specific Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP 996) the referenced methods and the USEPA Region I Laboratory Data Validation Functional Guidelines for
HOME OFFICE 28 GRACES DRIVE bull COATESVILLE PA19320 bull (610)383-7233 bull FAX (610) 383-7907
OFFICES IN LOUISIANA bull MARYLAND bull NEW JERSEY bull NORTH CAROLINA bull PENNSYLVANIA bull TENNESSEE bull TEXAS
^^frRILLIUNLc
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation ofSTL Connecticut No 200950 STL Chicago No 209497 (AsPb in Water) August 14 2002 Page 2 of 8
Evaluating InorganicsAnalyses (688 Rev 289) Qualifiers consistent with those defined in the Region I document were applied as necessary and appropriate
Although theQAPPspecifies that Level III datapackagesare requiredfor all analysesexcept the 5-year samplingevents raw datadeliverables (ie instrument print-outs) were provided in the data package submitted on 51602 for all of the metalsanalyses Unless otherwise notedthese raw data were not reviewed by Trillium as partof this evaluation Resubmissions received on 8102 and 8602 did not contain raw data printouts As specified in Section 92 of the QAPP (page 23) a Level m evaluation limited to an overview of the information provided on the summary forms was performed
The additional data provided on 8102 and 8602 included recalculations of the original analysis data aswell asre-analysisdata Except whereotherwise notedonly the8102 and8602 data submissions were the subject of this evaluation effort
Based on the evaluation the reported sample results were qualified or corrected as follows
bull The result fortotal arsenic in MW-DUP1-4-23-02 wasqualified as estimated (J)due to an unacceptably low post digestion spike recovery
bull The result for total lead in MW-104A-4-23-02 was corrected to 18 pgL (from 17 pgL) to accurately reflect the raw data and the recalculated IC
bull Results for totaland dissolvedarsenic inMW-104A-4-23-02and MW-CW-7A-4-23shy02 were qualified as estimated (J) based on a significant discrepancy between the measured concentrations for the two analysis fractions
These qualifiersare reflectedon theapplicable Laboratory TestResults formsin Attachment A to this report Region I qualifier definitions are also provided in this attachment
Details regarding the review and evaluation of these data are discussed below
Holding Times Preservation andSampleIntegrity A 2-page SubcontractingRequisition Form served asthe chainof custody (COC)documenting shipmentof thesamples bySTL Connecticuton 5202 and their receipt at STL Chicago on 5302 and was included only in the original data package submitted forevaluation Nodocumentation ofsample preservation wasfound onthis form although anacceptable(4degC plusmn2degC) coolertemperature(23degC) wasrecorded onthe Sample Receipt Checklist prepared by STL Chicago Copies of the field COC records were also included in the original STL Chicago data package Sample collection dates of 42302 and 42402 were documented on both the field COCs and the requisition form Physical preservation of the samples
^frRILLIUNLc
Mr Dave Fuerst EvaluationofSTLConnecticutNo200950STLChicagoNo209497(AsPb in Water)
August 142002 Page 3 of 8
with ice was recorded on the field COCs by the sampler and acceptable temperatures (46degC and 39degC) on receipt at STL Connecticut were documented on those COC records
Acidification of thesamples for metalsanalysis with nitric acid was recorded by the sampleron the field COCs but sample pHs on receipt were not recorded by STL Connecticut on these COCs and acidification was not documented by either laboratory on the requisition form Documentation of sample pHs was present on the STL Connecticut Preservative Record However this record gives no indication that both filtered and unfiltered samples were provided and does not specify the analyses intended for the samples preserved with different chemicals A single STL Connecticut identification number is listed for each sample and pHlt2 isindicated for each sample preserved with nitric acid Sample digestion logs included in the original STL Chicago data package did not include documentationof samplepHs TheSTL ChicagoSample Receipt ChecklistReport includes anotationstatingsimply that thesampleswere correctlypreservednootherdocumentation verifying individual sample pHs was found in the data package For the purposes of this evaluation it was assumed that the notations on theSTL Connecticut preservative log referred to the samplesfor both total and dissolved metals analyses and that acceptable pHs for all samples were measured by STL Chicago on receipt at that laboratory No further action was taken on this basis
Analyses for total and dissolved arsenic and lead were performed on 58-902 71102 and 715shy1702 well within the 6-month holding time specified by the QAPP
Calibrations The original arsenic analyses were performed on an instrument identified as AA4 in two analysis series on 5802 and a third series on 5902 The samples were analyzed for lead on AA8 in ananalysis serieson 5802 and two additionalseries on 5902 Based on theanalysis dates and times provided on the quality control (QC) summary forms initial and continuing calibration verification (ICVCCV) standardswere run at appropriatefrequencies throughout allof theoriginal GFAA (graphite furnace atomic absorption)analysis series All ICVCCV recoveries documented on the summary forms were acceptable (QC 90-110)
Linearitycheck results(iecorrelationcoefficients for theinitial multipointcalibrations)for arsenic and lead by GFAA were not provided on thesummary forms but were documented in the rawdata included in the original data packagesubmitted for review This information was located and noted by the evaluatorAcceptable correlation coefficients(gt0995) were reported for all six documented initial calibrations(ICs) whichincluded ablank and five standard concentrations (2103050and 70 pgL) for arsenic and a blank and five standard concentrations (2320 50 and 70 pgL) for lead However in all three arsenic ICs the concentration of the lowest standard used (true value shy2 pgL) measured against the associated IC was unacceptably low (071 pgL 084 pgL and 038 pgL QC plusmn10of true valuebased on professional judgment)This indicatesa low biasat the low end of the curveand suggests the possibility of reporting false negatives or positive resultsthat are biased lowAt therequest oftheevaluator thelaboratory droppedthe highestconcentration standard
^TRILLIUNlbdquoe
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Connecticut No 200950 STL Chicago No 209497 (AsPb in Water) August 14 2002 Page 4 of 8
run for arsenic (70 pgL) in the two ICs on 5802 and recalculated all sample results against the modified curves Although measured concentrations for the low standards were significantly improved for arsenic against the modified ICs they were still unacceptably low (145 pgL and 147pgL)
The 5902 IC for arsenic was not recalculated by the laboratory Several sample results were reported from the original analyses on 5802 and 5902 despite the still-unacceptable low-end responses However all of these results were greater than the next-highest concentration standard (10 pgL) as measured by the instrument Since the concentrations of this and all higher standards used in each IC wereaccurate when measured against the associated ICthe sampleresults reported from these series(total and dissolvedarsenic in MW-DUP1-4-23-02 total arsenic in MW-104A-4shy23-02 andSW-8-042302and dissolvedarsenic in MW-102A-4-23-02)are usableand noaction was taken by the evaluator
The laboratory re-analyzed all of the remaining samples for total andor dissolved arsenic in three analytical series on AA3 on 71502 one series on AA3 on 71602 and one series on AA4 on 71702 Acceptablecorrelation coefficientswere reported for theICs performed at thestart ofeach of these series which included a blank and six standard concentrations (2 5 10 30 50 and 70 pgL) The concentration of the 2 pgL standard as measured against each IC was acceptable (193 pgL to 222 pgL) in four of these series In the IC associated with the second 71502 series the response for thelow standardwasslightlyhigh (238 pgL)This suggeststhe possibilityof reporting false positives or positive results that are biased high Since arsenic was not detected in any of the samples re-analyzed during this series no action was warranted on this basis
Based ontheanalysis datesand timesprovided onthe QCsummaryforms ICVCCV standardswere run at appropriate frequencies throughout all of the arsenic re-analysis series All ICVCCV recoveriesdocumented onthe summaryforms wereacceptable (QC90-110) Allof the re-analysis results for arsenic should be considered replacements for the original analysis results which were associated with unacceptable IC standards
Measured concentrations of the lowest standard run for lead in the 5802 series and the second 5902 series (183 pgL and 186 pgL for lead) were just within the evaluator-established acceptance limits but sample results for this element were also recalculated by the laboratory after dropping the 70 pgL standard from the IC Measured concentrations of the low concentration standards in both recalculated ICs (202 pgL and 190 pgL) were closer to the true value in the recalculations Results for totallead inMW-CW-5B-4-23-02 MW-102A-4-23-02and MW-104A-4shy23-02 and for dissolved lead in MW-CW-7A-4-23-02and MW-DUP1-4-23-02 were appropriately reported by the laboratory from the recalculated original analyses and no action was warranted by the evaluator
^TRILLIUMtrade
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation ofSTL Connecticut No 200950 STL Chicago No 209497 (AsPb in Water) August 14 2002 Page 5 of 8
Samples MW-CW-7A-4-23-02 and MW-DUP1-4-23-02 wererun fortotal leadand MW-CW-5B-4shy23-02 MW-102A-4-23-02 and MW-104A-4-23-02 were runfor dissolved lead in the first analysis series on 5902 The measured concentration of the low concentration standard was unacceptably low in both the originally-calculated IC (119 pgL) and in the recalculated 1C (138 pgL) Therefore these samples were re-analyzed by the laboratory
Re-analyses for lead were performed in a single series on AA8 on 71102 An acceptable correlation coefficient was reported for the IC performed at the start of this series which included a blank andfive standard concentrations(232050and 70 pgL)The concentrationof the 2 pgL standard as measured against this IC was acceptable (204 pgL) All of the re-analysis results for lead should beconsidered replacements forthe original analysis resultswhich wereassociated with unacceptable IC standards
Contract required detection limit (CRDL) standards runfor both target analytes at the beginning of each analysis series gave acceptable recoveries (890-119 QC 80-120)
Blanks Based on the analysis dates and times provided on the summary forms initial and continuing calibration blanks(ICBCCBs) were run at appropriate frequencies throughout allof the relevant sample analysis series No concentrations of arsenic or lead above the applicable method detection limits (MDLs) or below the negative MDLs were reported in any of the ICBCCBs
Two water-matrix preparation blanks were digested with the samples for each target analyte No arsenic or lead contamination was reported in either preparation blank which were re-analyzed for total and dissolved arsenic and for dissolved lead with the associated samples
Laboratory ControlSamples Twolaboratory control samples(LCSs) were prepared and analyzed with the samples for each target analyte LCS results for arsenic were reported from the original 5802 analysis series only as calculated against both the original and modified ICs and from the original 5902 IConly whichwas notrecalculated Thereported recoveries wereacceptable(105 and 88 QC 80-120) Neither LCS was re-analyzed for arsenic Since the responses measured by the instrument were greater than 10 pgL for these QC samples (see discussion for arsenic in Calibration section) the reported results are usable and no action was warranted on this basis
The recalculated LCSresult forlead (113)in the 5802 analysisseries wasacceptable Thesecond LCS was run in the 5902 series which was still unacceptable at the low end alter recalculation Since theinstrument response forthe LCS wasgreater than 3 pgL (thenext highest ICstandard for which the measured response was accurate) the reported result was usable and no action was warranted on this basis
^^TRILLIUMtrade
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation ofSTL Connecticut No 200950 STL Chicago No 209497 (AsPb in Water) August 142002 Page 6 of 8
DuplicateAnalysisSample MW-CW-5B-4-23-02wasanalyzed induplicatefor totaland dissolved arsenicand lead No targetanalytes were detected inany of the paired sample analysestherefore no quantitative evaluation of precision could be made using these data
Matrix Spike Analysis Sample MW-CW-5B-4-23-02 was prepared and analyzed as a matrix spikematrix spike duplicate pair for total and dissolved arsenic and lead Percent recoveries were acceptable (967-107QC 75-125) andshowed excellent reproducibility(09-59 RPDQC 520 RPD) in all cases
Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption (GFAA) QC Post-digestion spike (PDS) recoveries for arsenic andlead werereported onthe QC summaryformsand wereacceptable (QC 85-115)except for totalarsenic in MW-DUP1-4-23-02(835) MW-CW-5B-4-23-02(129) andLCH3-042302 (120)dissolved arsenicin MW-CW-5B-4-23-02(128)SW-10-042302 (126)LCH3-042302 (118) SW-16-042302 (123) SW-5-042302 (119) and SW-DUP-042302 (118) total lead in MW-DUP1-4-23-02 (121) and dissolved lead in MW-102A-4-23-02 (121)
The result for total arsenic in MW-DUP1-4-23-02 was qualified as estimated (J) based on the unacceptably low PDS recovery
The unacceptable PDS recoveriesfor the remaining samples listed above were all too high and the applicable target analytewas notdetected inany ofthe affected analysesTherefore nofurther action was warranted based on PDS recoveries
No method of standard addition analyses were performed
SampleResults Resultsgreater thanor equalto the laboratory-specified MDLswere appropriately reported on the Laboratory Results Forms for both analytes in each sample as applicable
The result for total lead in MW-104A-4-23-02 was corrected to 18 pgL (from 17 pgL) by the evaluator to accurately reflect the raw data and the recalculated IC
All detected and undetected sample results for arsenic and lead were correctly adjusted (multiplied by 05) by the laboratory to reflect the concentration factor resulting from processing 50 mL of sample toa final volume of 25 mLwhich wasclearlydocumented onthe laboratorysdigestion logs
Form X documentation of MDLs for arsenic and lead was not provided in the data package therefore the date on which these values were established is not known MDLs for both target elements were documented on the Laboratory Test Results forms since they are different for the original and rerun analyses of both elementsit would appear that they were re-established between May andJulyof2002The laboratory-reportedsample resultsand the quality control summaryform
^^TRILLIUM
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Connecticut No 200950 STL Chicago No 209497 (AsPb in Water) August 142002 Page 7 of 8
results reflected the applicable MDLs from the Laboratory Test Results forms in all cases and no action was taken on this basis
Field Duplicates MW-DUP1-4-23-02 was identified as a field duplicate of MW-102A-4-23-02 based on information provided by theclient Acceptable reproducibility was demonstrated for total arsenic(35 RPD)and dissolvedarsenic(0 RPD)inthese pairedsample analysesTotal anddissolved lead were not detected in either of the paired samples therefore no further quantitative evaluation of precision could be made using these data
Sample SW-DUP-042302was identifiedasafield duplicateof SW-5-042302 based on information provided by theclient Total anddissolved arsenic were not detected in eitherof the paired samples therefore no quantitative evaluation of precision could be made using these data
Total versus Dissolved Concentrations Comparison of total versus dissolved results for lead and arsenic in the ground water samples revealed the following cases where the validated dissolved concentration was higher than the validated total concentration
Sample ID Element Total Dissolved D
MW-104A-4-23-02 As 62 110 774
MW-CW-7A-4-23-02 As 84 93 107
Results for total and dissolved arsenic in MW-104A-4-23-02 and MW-CW-7A-4-23-02 were qualified as estimated (J) due to significant discrepancies (D gt10) between the measured concentrations for the two analysis fractions
Documentation Original data package documentation was inconsistent with the specifications of the QAPP specifically a Level IV package was provided when a Level ID package was required Pursuant to thevalidation specificationsfor thisproject theadditional raw datadocumentation was not reviewed by Trillium aspart ofthis evaluationexcept where otherwise noted in thisreport The revised data submitted for review on 8102 and 8602 included summary forms only consistent with the QAPP specifications
Where applicableboth recalculatedoriginal andre-analysis resultswere includedon theLaboratory Test Results forms for the site samples As previously discussed only the re-analysis results for arsenic and lead where available should be used Therefore for the sake of clarity the original analysis resultsfor totaland dissolved arsenicin allsite sampleswhere re-analysis resultswere also reported were deleted from the Laboratory Test Results forms by the evaluator
TRILLIUM
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation ofSTL Connecticut No 200950 STL Chicago No 209497 (AsPb in Water) August 142002 Page 8 of 8
QC summary forms in the revised data package provided on 8102 did not include documentation oflinearity (ICs)On requestSTLChicago providedlinear regressionspreadsheetson 8602which included all pertinent data forthe ICand listed the associated sample responsesand final reportable results These were incorporated into the revised data package receivedon 8102 by the evaluator Since COC records sample receipt checklists and digestion logs are only available in the original data package bothdata packagesmust be maintained inthe file to ensurethat accurateand complete documentation is available for future reference
The QCsummaryforms in therevised datapackage providedon 8102 included anentryfor thelow concentration ICstandard in eachseries Inevery case thereported resultwasMDL Uindicating that the analyte was not detected at this concentration Based on the data found on the linear regression spreadsheets the evaluatorcorrected all of the low concentrationstandard entries on the QC summary forms to reflect the actual measured concentrations
Subcontracting requisition forms used asCOC records were provided in the data package included all reported samples and were properly completed except that sample preservation was notclearly documented by either laboratoryThis informationshould always be documented on theapplicable COC record(s)
The QC summary forms provided in the data package did not differentiate between total and dissolved arsenic and lead analyses Based on the laboratorys own run logs which were provided in theoriginal datapackageand thelinear regressionspreadsheets provided on 8602 bothof which included DandTsuffixes the evaluator wasable todifferentiate betweenthe total anddissolved sample analyses This information was transcribed to each of the quality control summary reports in the revised datapackage by theevaluator toensure thataccurate informationisavailable for future reference
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this data package review report
Sincerely
Cud Carol A Erikson Quality Assessment Manager
CAEdas April2002Metals(95406)
^^TRILLIUM
ATTACHMENT A
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS STL Chicago Job No 209497
EPA Region IQualifier Definitions
U - The material was analyzed for bat was not detected above the level of the associated value The associated valueis eitherthesample quantitationlimit or the sampledetection limit
J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity
R - The data are unusable (Note Analyte may or may not be present)
UJ - The materialwas analyzed forbut was not detected The associated value is an estimate and may be inaccurate or imprecise
S E V E R N
VT RENT-
S H H V i C E S
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 209497 Oate07252002
CUSTOMER Severn Trent Laboratories PROJECT OH GROUNDWATER ATTN Paul Hobart
Customer Sample ID 200950-02 Laboratory Sample ID 209497-2 Date Sampled 04242002 Date Received 05032002AfiV-J09-4-ltbull-gt2r0gtTime Sampled 1240 Time Received 1030 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS HDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
7060A Arsenic(GFAA) IIArsenic -34- -4-r5- -5rlaquo- ugL 51510 050902 1243 7 Arsenic 20 50 50 ugL 57067 RA 071702 1424 daj
7421 Lead (GFAA) Lead 10 10 10 ugL 51274 050902 0111 daj
7060A Arsenic(GFAA) Arsenic Diss 14 090 10 ugL 51510 050902 1721 daj
7421 Lead (GFAA) Load Dice 4x0- 4x0- 4x0- ugL SHP2 050903 1559 Lead Diss 095 095 10 ugL 57141 RA 071102 1300 daj
In Description - Dry Wgt Page 3
nenrraquoi
S E V E R N
aiiiaraiBiaftK
S E R V I C E S
STL-41 12 inenot
SE VERN
ffT RVE-N-Tshy
S E R V I C E S
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 209497 Date07252002
CUSTOMER- Severn Trent Laboratories PROJECT O H GROUNDWATER ATTN Paul Hobart
Customer Sample ID 200950-03 Laboratory Sample ID 209497-3 Date Sampled 04242002 Date Received 05032002 Time Sampled 1415 Time Received 1030MVl-loyA-y-z-i-o-Sanple Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS HDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
7060A Arsenic (GFAA) Arsenic 62 J 45 50 ugL 51510 050902 1254 daj
7421 Lead (GFAA) Lead bull + 1 0 1 0 ugL 51274 050902 0123 daj
ok 37060A Arsenic (GFAA) C Arsonici Pioc -23 -4T5- -3tO- ugL- 51510 05090D 1730 dej Arsenic Diss 110 S 50 50 ugL 57025 RA 071602 1226 daj
m7421 Lead (GFAA) 6
Lead Disci -+T0 -4T6mdash -tr6- -ogtr 51492 050902 1312 8 Lead Diss 095 095 10 ugL 57141 RA 071102 1313 daj
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 4
STL I 1
S E R V i C E S
Job Number 209497
CUSTOMER Severn Trent Laboratories
Customer Sample ID 200950-01 Date Sampled 04242002 Time Sampled 1045 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTESTDESCRIPTION
7060A Arsenic (GFAA) Aroonis Arsenic
7421 Lead (GFAA) Lead
7060A Arsenic (GFAA) Arsenic Diss Arsenic Diss
7421 Lead (GFAA) Lcod Diosi Lead Diss
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S
PROJECT0 M GROUNDWATER
Laboratory Sample ID 209497-1 Date Received 05032002 Time Received 1030
SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS MDL Rl DILUTION
090 090 -4t9shy10 10 10
10 10 10
-4-r3- 090 -4rOshy10 10 1 0
-4r0- -+r9shy095 095 1 0
Date07252002
ATTN Paul Hobart
UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
ugL 51326 050002 1435 da ugL 57022 RA 071502 1638 daj
ugL 51274 050902 0008 daj
ugL 54549- 050902 1624 ugL 57022 RA 071502 2225 daj
ugL 51492 050902 1156 tfcrj ugL 57141 RA 071102 1235 dajHi
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 2
STl -illWflm
Job timber 20997
Customer Sanple 10 200950-04 Date Sampled 04242002 Time Saapled 1540 Sample Matrix Mater
7060A Arsenic CGFAA) Areenie Arsenic
7421 Lead (GFAA) Lead Lead
706GA Arsenic ltGFAAgt Arsenic Dies Arsenic Diss
7421 Lead(6FAA) Lead Diss
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S
Laboratory Sample ID 209497-4 Date Received 05032002 Tine Received 1030
CAUllilof
amp
-7T 090 kl j 10 10
10 10 10 095 095 10
-63- -098- -+sOshy
laquo X 10 10
flhfWi
10 10 10
Date08122002
U9L M326- 050002 1606 ugL 57022 RA 071502 1701 daj
ugL 51492 050902 1053 daj ugL 57141 RA 071102 1132 da]
UgL 54H0- 080902 1750S 0lugL 57022 RA 071602 0135 daj
ugL 51492 050902 1935 daj
In Description bull Dry Wgt Page 2
S E V ER N
bull T R E NT S I R V I C I i S
Job Nunber 209497
CUSTOMER Severn Trent Laboratories
Customer Sample ID 200950-12 Date Sampled 04252002 Time Sampled 1200 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION
7060A Arsenic (GFAA) Arsenic Arsenic Arsenic Piss Arsenic Diss
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S
PROJECT 0 M GROUNDWATER
Laboratory Sample ID 20949711 Date Received 05032002 Time Received 1030
Ciielulo
SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS MDL RL
-U4- -090- -4-rOshy10 10 10 -090- -Or90- -4t0shy10 10 1 0
DILUTION
0ate07252002
ATTN Paul Hobart
UNITS BATCH 0T DATETIME TECH
ugL 51510 050902 15104ej ugL 57022 RA 071502 2139da] ugL 51510 050902 1944dajs ugL 57022 RA 071602 0307daj
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 12
STi-imirxwoi
S E V E R N
T RE N T S E R V I C E S
Job Number 209497
CUSTOMER Severn Trent Laboratories
Customer Sample ID 200950-13 Date Sampled 04252002 Time Sampled 0900 Sample Matrix Water
TESTMETHQO PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION
7060A Arsenic (GFAA) Arsenic Arsenic Arconis-Pi6s Arsenic Diss
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Date07252002
PROJECT O N GROUNDWATER ATTN PaulHobart
Up-o^boshy
Laboratory Sample ID 209497-12 Date Received 05032002 Time Received 1030
SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS NDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
-090shy10 090 10
-MQshy10 090 10
4-rOshy10 -4-rOshy10
ugL ugL ugL ugL
51510 57022 51510 57022
050902 1533 RA 071502 2202
050902 2007 daj dej-
RA 071602 0319daj
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 13
m-411lt0600)
S E V E R N
bullVTR E NT
bull S E R V I C E S
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nunber 209497 Date07252002
CUSTOMER Severn Trent Laboratories PROJECT 0 M GROUNDWATER ATTN Paul Hobart
Customer Sample 10 200950-09 Laboratory Sample ID 209497-8 Date Sampled 04252002 Date Received 05032002 Time Sampled 1125 lt51 Time Received 1030 Sample Matrix Water
TEST WETHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS MDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
7060A Arsenic (GFAA) ftf
Arsenic 12 090 10 ugL 51510 050902 1436 daj Arsenic Diaa 87 -4r9shy ugLshy 51510 050903 1847 Arsenic Diss 12 10 1 0 ugL 57022 RA 071602 0221 daj
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 9
ST1-1112116001
S E R V I C E S
Job Number 209497 L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S
Date07252002
CUSTOMER Severn Trent Laboratories PROJECT 0 M GROUNDWATER ATTN Paul Hobart
Customer Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sanpled Sample Matrix
200950-08 04252002 1050 Water
5vl0-o^bogt-
CtUhloi
Laboratory Sample ID Date Received Time Received
209497-7 05032002 1030
TESTrHETMCO PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS MDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
7060A Arsenic (GFAA) Arsenic bull Arsenic Arsenic Diss Arsenic Diss
-Or90shy10 090 10
-0T9Bshy1 0 -0T9Qshy1 0
-4t0shy10 -+tcopyshy
10
ugL ugL ugL ugL
51510 57067 51510 57022
RA 050902 1414 071702 1447 050902 1836
RA 071602 0210 dajjgt
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 6
STL-411210600)
SE V ER N
TR E N T-r1
si-Hviciis
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 209497 Date07252002
CUSTOMER Severn Trent Laboratories PROJECT O H GROUNDWATER ATTN Paul Hobart
Customer Sample ID 200950-11 Laboratory Sample ID 209497-10 Date Sampled 04252002 Date Received 05032002 Time Sampled 1045 Time Received 1030 Sample Matrix Water Qltiliblof
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION- SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS MDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH 4
7060A Arsenic (GFAA) 1 Aroenio -0r9- -4T94 -4r8- U9L 51510 050903 US9 Arsenic 10 10 10 ugL 57022 RA 071502 2128 daj Arsenir Diss -4x90- -4r0- ugL 51510 050902 1933 daj Arsenic Diss 10 1 0 1 0 ugL 57022 RA 071602 0244 daj
In Description - Dry Wgt Page 11
1119 ffXWM
S E V E R N
bull T-R EN T Vshy
S E R V i C E S
Job Number 209497 L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S
Date07252002
CUSTOMER Severn Trent Laboratories PROJECT O H GROUNDWATER ATTN Paul Hobart
Customer Sample ID 2009S0-10 Date Sampled 04252002 Time Sampled 0938 Sample Matrix Water
LM3 -Md-loV MHlulo-r
Laboratory Sample ID 2094979 Date Received 05032002 Time Received 1030
bullTESTMETHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS MDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH TgtT DATETIME TECH
7060A Arsenic (GFAA) Arcenie Arsenic Anocnio Diooi Arsenic Diss
-M9shy10 -ampr99shy10
-Ot90shy10 -0T98shy1 0
4tOshy10 4rOshy10
ugL ugL ugL ugL
51510 57022 51510 57022
050902 1448 cr
RA 071502 2116 050902 1931
RA 071602 0233
daj
dajM i
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 10
S E V E R N
S E R V I C E S
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nunber 209497 Date07252002
CUSTOMER SevernTrent laboratories PROJECT 0 M GROUNDWATER ATTN Paul Hobart
Customer Sample ID 200950-07 Laboratory Sample ID 209497-6 Date Sampled 04242002 - i fs it^A Date Received 05032002 Time Sampled 0945 TimeReceived = 1030 Sample Matrix Water CtHhW
TEST METHOO PARAMETERTESTDESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS HDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
7060A Arsenic (GFAA) Arsenic -35shy -490shy -40shy ugfcshy 51510 050900 1402 Arsenic 37 10 10 ugL 57067 RA 071702 1435 daj 1 5 Arsenic Diss -49shy -490shy -49shy ugL 51510 050900 4024 Arsenic Diss 30 10 10 ugL 57022 RA 071602 0147 daj1
gt
In Description = Dry Ugt Page 7
STL 112 insTKH
356 FARRAGUT CROSSING DRrRILLIUM INC KNOXVILLE TN 37922Consultants in Environmental Chemistry
[423) 966-8880 FAX (423) 966-8885
ceriksontnlliuminccom
June 28 2002
Mr Dave Fuerst OampM Inc 540 Hopmeadow Street Simsbury CT 06070
RE Data Package Review Report - STL Connecticut Report No 200950 - Wet Chemistry Parameters in Water
Dear Dave
Ihave completed my evaluation of the wet chemistry analysis data prepared by the Severn Trent Laboratory in Shelton Connecticut (STL Connecticut) for 12 water samples from the LampRR Site which were reported in asingle data package under Report No 200950 The data package was received by Trillium for review on May 162002 with additional information provided on June 26 2002 The following samples were reported
MW-CW-5B-4-23-02 MW-102A-4-23-02 MW-104A-4-23-02 MW-CW-7A-4-23-02 MW-DUP1-04-23-02 LCH-4-042302 SW-10-042302 SW-8-042302 LCH-3-042302 SW-16-042302 SW-5-042302 SW-DUP-042302
Sample identifications are listed above exactly as they are found on the chain of custody records Sample identificationson theLaboratory Test Resultsformswere correctedby theevahiator as necessary to accurately reflect the chain of custody identifications
Analyses wereperformed accordingto EPAMethod 3000(chlorideEPA 1993Rev 1997) EPA Method 4051 (BOD Methodsfor Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes [EPA-6004-79shy020383]) EPAMethod 4104(COD Methodsfor ChemicalAnalysisof Waterand Wastes [EPAshy6004-79-020 383]) and EPA 3501 (ammonia Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes [EPA-6004-79-020383]) Allof theMW-samples wereanalyzed forall fourparameters the SW- and LCH- samples were analyzed for chloride only My evaluation was based on the specifications of the project-specific Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP 996) the referenced methods and to the extent applicable the USEPA Region I Laboratory Data Validation Functional
HOME OFFICE 28 GRACES DRIVE bull COATESVILLE PA19320 bull (610)383-7233 bull FAX (610) 383-7907
OFFICES IN LOUISIANA bull MARYLAND bull NEW JERSEY bull NORTH CAROLINA bull PENNSYLVANIA bull TENNESSEE bull TEXAS
TRILLIUM NC
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Connecticut Report No 200950 (Wet Chemistry Parameters in Water) June 282002 Page 2 of 6
Guidelinesfor Evaluating Inorganics Analyses (688 Rev 289) Qualifiers consistent with those defined in the Region I document were applied as necessary and appropriate
No raw sample data were initially provided inthe data packageHowever in response to the evahiators request for missing summary data all supporting raw data were provided by the laboratory These raw data were not reviewed by Trillium aspart of thisevaluation As specified in Section 92 of the QAPP (page 23) a Level III evaluation limited to an overview of the quality control results was performed
Based on the evaluation sample results were qualified as follows
bull Results for BOD in all five MW- samples were qualified as estimated (J) based on poor reproducibility in the field duplicate analyses
TheBqualifier applied to theresult for BODin MW-CW-7A-4-23-02was removed by the
evaluator
Based on professional judgment the evaluator recommends that the data user consider only the reporting limits (rather than the method detection limits which are also included on the sample results forms) as theless than values associated with all non-detected target analyte results
All qualifiers are reflected on the Laboratory Test Results forms included in Attachment A to this report Region I qualifier definitions are also provided in this attachment
At the discretion of the data user the following points may warrant attention by laboratory personnel with regard to this data package and prior to future sampling events at this site
bull Documentation of sample pHs at the time of laboratory receipt directly on all chain of custody records
bull Documentation of correlation coefficients for all applicable initial calibrations
Specific details regarding the review and evaluation of these data are discussed below
Holding Times PreservationandSampleIntegrityCopies of thetwo applicable chain ofcustody (COC) records were included in the data package documenting sample collection dates of 42402 and 42502 Physical preservation of the samples with ice was recorded by the sampler and acceptable temperatures(46degC 39degC and 23degC) onlaboratory receipt were documented on both COCs
^ TRILLIUM
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Connecticut Report No 200950 (Wet Chemistry Parameters in Water) June 282002 Page 3 of 6 ___
Acidification of the samples for ammonia and COD analyses with sulfuric acid was also recorded by the sampler onthe COC for samples collected on42402 theseanalyses were not requested for the samples collected on 42502 However sample pHs on receipt at the laboratory were not recorded on theCOC by STL Connecticut STLCT Preservative Recordsfor all sampleswere included in the data package Although these did not specify the analyses intended for the samples preserved with different chemicals they did indicate that thecontents ofthe sample containersacidified with sulfuric acid were at pHlt2at the time theywere received indicating that they wereproperly preserved in the field For the purposesof this evaluation it was assumed that these notations referred to thesamples for ammonia and COD analysis and no further action was taken on this basis
All sampleanalyses for chloride CODand ammonia were performed within the 28-day holdingtime specified by the QAPP for these parameters BOD incubation was initiated on 42502 for all applicable samples this is within the required 48-hour holding time in all cases
Calibrations Chloride analyses were performed according to EPA 3000 (ion chromatography) Based on the summary forms initial calibrations (05-50 mgL) were performed on 42502 and on 42602 at thestart ofeach analysisseries during whichthe samples wererun However correlation coefficients were not documented in the data package for either IC At the request of the evahiator the laboratory provided documentation of acceptablecorrelation coefficients (gt0995) for both ICs on 62602 Initial and continuing calibration verification (ICVCCV) standards were run at appropriate frequencies throughout both chloride analysis series and all recoveries were acceptable (QC 85-115) as reported on the summary form
Ammonia analyses were performed according to EPA 3501 in a single analysis series on 42902 No evidence of initial calibration was documented on the summaryform received for review At the request of the evahiator the laboratory provided documentation showing that initial calibration for ammonia was performed at the start of the analysis series and that a calibration range of 004 mgL to 40 mgL wasestablished Acceptable correlationcoefficients for twosegments ofthiscurve (004 mgL to 10 mgL and 10 mgL to 40 mgL) were also documented in this additionally-submitted documentation Based on the analysis times on the summary form ICVCCV standards were run at appropriate frequencies throughout the ammoniaanalysis series Allrecoverieswere acceptable(QC 85-115) as reported on the summary form
COD analyses were performed according to EPA 4104 in a single analysisseries on 5602 Based on the summary form initial calibration(10-150 mgL) was performed at the start of the series but no correlation coefficient was documented in the data package At the request of the evaluator the laboratory provided documentation of an acceptable correlation coefficient for this IC on 62602 Based on the analysis times on the summary form ICVCCV standards were run at appropriate
frRILLIUKLc
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Connecticut Report No 200950 (Wet Chemistry Parameters in Water) June 282002 Page 4 of 6
frequencies throughout the COD analysis series All recoveries were acceptable (QC 85-115) as reported on the summary form
Calibration is not applicable to the BOD analyses which were performed by titration
Blanks Method blank results were reported for ammonia COD chloride and BOD on summary forms in the data package no contamination was reported above the laboratory-specified method detection limit (MDL) in any of these blanks
Initial and continuing calibration blanks (ICBCCBs) were run at the appropriate frequencies for ammonia COD and chloride Based on the summary forms provided for review no contamination was detected in any of these blanks with the exception of one CCB for chloride run on 42702 at 0914 (0097 mgL) No site samples were bracketed by this CCB therefore no sample results warranted qualification on this basis
LaboratoryControlSamplesResults for laboratory control samples (LCSs) analyzed on each date that samples wereanalyzed forCOD ammoniaand chloride were reportedon summaryforms in the data package Acceptable recoveries (97-104) were reported for all three parameters
No LCS was reported for BOD
Duplicate Analysis Unspiked duplicate analyses of MW-CW-5B-4-23-02 were performed for ammonia COD chloride and BOD Positive paired results for chloride COD and BOD showed excellent reproducibility with relative percent differences (RPDs) of 1 0 and 0 respectively Ammonia wasnot detectedin eithersample analysistherefore no quantitative evaluation of precision could be made for this parameter using these data
Unspiked duplicate analyses of SW-10-042302 were performed for chloride Positive paired results showed excellent reproducibility (0 RPD)
MatrixSpikeAnalysisSample MW-CW-5B-4-23-02 was prepared and analyzed as a matrixspike for ammoniaCOD chlorideand BODAcceptable percent recoveries(QC75-125) werereported for all four parameters (83-118)
Sample SW-10-042302 was prepared and analyzed as a matrix spike for chloride An acceptable recovery (100) was reported for this parameter
Sample Results Sample results greater than or equal to the laboratory-specified MDLs for ammonia COD chloride and BOD were reported on the Laboratory Test Results forms for all
^TRILLIUM1NC
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Connecticut Report No 200950 (Wet Chemistry Parameters in Water) June 282002 Page 5 of 6
samples BothMDLsand laboratory-specified reportinglimits (RLs) aredocumented onthese forms The result for BOD in MW-CW-7A-4-23-02 wasgreater than theMDL but less thanthe RL andwas qualified as B by the laboratory Since the reported BOD concentration in this sample is greater than twice the MDL no qualifier was applied by the evaluator on this basis and the B qualifier applied by the laboratory was removed All other reported sample results were greater than the laboratory-specified RLs
No documentation supporting the MDLs was provided in the data package RLs for chloride ammonia and COD are equal to or greater than the lowest IC standard analyzed in association with the site samples Based on professional judgment the evaluator recommends that the data user consider only the RLs as the less than values associated with all non-detected results
Dilution factorsfor eachanalysis parameter areincluded onthe Laboratory Test Resultsforms With the exception discussed below the reported sample results were within the applicable calibration range at the noted dilution
Chloride wasreportedat 270mgLinMW-104A-4-23-02Thisconcentrationexceedstheestablished calibration range (05-50 mgL) but a dilution factor of 10 is indicated on the Laboratory Test Results form for this sample In response to the evaluators request for clarification the laboratory explained that the reported result was taken from a diluted analysis of thissample but their software did not include the dilution factor onthe sample results form A dilution factor of 25 wasverified by the evaluator basedon thesupporting raw data provided by thelaboratory and the dilution factor on the Laboratory Test Results form for this sample was corrected to 25 (from 1) by the evaluator
FieldDuplicatesSample MW-DUP1-04-23-02 wasidentified as a field duplicate ofMW-102A-4shy23-02 based on information provided by the client Positive paired results for ammonia (6 RPD) chloride (0 RPD) and COD (11 RPD) showed very good reproducibility (QC pound30) The positive paired results for BOD showed very poor reproducibility (109 RPD) Results for BOD in all five MW- samples were qualified as estimated (J) on this basis
DocumentationCOC records provided in the data package included all reported samples and were properly completed with the following exceptions
bull Improper corrections were noted on both documents In the future all corrections should be made by drawinga singleline through theincorrect information insertingthe correct information and initialing and dating the change Obliterations write-overs and unsigned cross-outs are not legally defensible
TRILLIUMHS
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Connecticut Report No 200950 (Wet Chemistry Parameters in Water) June 282002 Paee 6 of 6
bull No shipment information was recorded on the 42402 COC and only the notation shipped via FedEx was found on the 42502 COC Both the courier name and the applicable airbill number should be recorded on all COCs
According to the 42602 sample receipt checklist the bottle labels for samples collected on 42502 included the prefix MW- on all sample identifications this prefix was not included in the identifications recorded on the COC record The sample identifications used throughout this report are those found on the COC record
Summary IC data for chloride ammonia and COD were incomplete as provided in the initial data package received for review In responseto the evaluators request for the missing information the laboratory provided full supporting raw data for all analysis parameters These data were added to the data package behind the originally provided summary pages by the evaluator
A dilution factor of 25 for chloride in MW-104A-4-23-02 was verified based on the raw data provided by the laboratory at the evaluators request The Laboratory Test Results form for this sample was corrected by the evaluator to reflect the appropriate dilution factor
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this data package review report
Sincerely
Carol A Erikson Quality Assessment Manager
CAEesc April 2002Wet Chan (95406)
frRILLIUNLc
ATTACHMENT A
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS STL Connecticut Report No 200950
EPA Region IQualifierDefinitions
U - The material was analyzed for but was not detected above the level of the associated value The associated value is either the sample quantitation limit or the sample detection limit
J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity
R - The data are unusable (Note Analyte may or may not be present)
UJ - The material was analyzed for but was not detected The associated value is an estimate and may be inaccurate or imprecise
C
Job Nunber 200950
CUSTOMER0amp M INC
Customer Sample ID MU-102A-4-23-02 Date Sampled 04242002 Time Sampled 1240 Sample Matrix Uater
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION
3000 Ion Chromatography Analysis Chloride
4051 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD 5 day) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5)
bulls
3501 Nitrogen Ammonia as N (ColAutPhen) Ammonia (NH3) as N
4104 Chemical Oxygen Demand Chemical Oxygen Demand(COO)
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S
PROJECT L RR LANDFILL
Laboratory Sanple ID 200950-2 Date Received 04252002 Time Received 0905
SAMPLE RESULT FUGS MDL RL
50 0084 10
10 cr 012 20 lt5 ife -raquof
051 0029 0040
261 360 100
Date05082002
ATTN DAVID FUERST
DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
mgL 5039 042602 0619 cfdn
mgL 5080 042502 1236 dtn
mgL 5003 042902 1233 jos
mgL 5204 050602 1429
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 3
Job Number 200950
CUSTOMER 0amp ft INC
Customer Sample ID MU-DUP1-4-23-02 Date Sampled 04242002 Time Sampled 0900 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION
3000 Ion Chromatography Analysis Chloride
4051 Biochemical Oxygen Demand(BOO 5 day) Biochemical Oxygen Demand(B0D5) shy
3501 Nitrogen Ammonia as N (ColAutPhen) Ammonia (NH3) as N
4104 Chemical Oxygen Demand Chemical Oxygen Demand (COO)
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Date05082002
PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Laboratory Sample ID 200950-5 Date Received 04252002 Time Received 0905
SAMPLE RESULT FUGS HDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
50 0084 10 mgL 5039 042602 0716 ddra
34 3 012 20 mgL 5080 042502 1300 dtn
054 0029 0040 mgL 5003 042902 1237 JOS
234 360 100 mgL 5204 050602 1445
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 6
4
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 200950 Date05082002
CUSTOMER 0-M-INC PROJECTl RRLANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID KW-104A-4-23-02 Laboratory Sample ID 200950-3 Date Sampled 04242002 Date Received 04252002 Time Sampled 1415 Time Received 0905 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOO PARAHETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS MDL L DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
3000 Ion Chromatography Analysis Chloride 270 0084 10 a mgL 5039 042602 1007 ddn
4051 Biochemical Oxygen Demand(BOD 5 day) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) 40 1 012 2 0
Ci ijufol mgL 5080 042502 1244 dtn
3501 Nitrogen Anmonia as N (ColAutPhen) Ammonia XNH3) as N 23
fitEMlot 0029 0040 mgL 5003 042902 1249 JOS
4104 Chemical Oxygen Demand Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) 949 180 500 mgL 5204 050602 1434
In Description - Dry Wgt Page 4
L A 8 0 R A T 0 R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nunber 200950 Date05082002
CUSTOMER0amp HIRC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID HW-CW-5B-4-23-02 Laboratory Sample ID 200950-1 Date Sampled 04242002 Date Received 04252002 Time Sampled 1045 Time Received 0905 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS KDL Rl DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
3000 Ion Chromatography Analysis Chloride 22 0084 1 0 mgL 5039 042602 0444 ddn
4051 Biochemical Oxygen Demand(BOO 5 day) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) 28 J 012 2 0 mgL 5080 042502 1212 dtn
3501 Nitrogen Ammonia as N (ColAutPhen) Ammonia (NH3) as N ND 0029 0040 mgL 5003 042902 1230 JOS
4104 Chemical Oxygen Demand Chemical Oxygen Demand (COO) 193 360 100 mgL 5204 050602 1413
In Description = Dry Ugt Page 2
Job Nutter 200950
CUSTOMER 0 amp M INC
Customer Sample ID MW-CW-7A-4-23-02 Date Sampled 04242002 Time Sampled 1540 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION
3000 Ion Chromatography Analysis Chloride
4051 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD 5 day) Biochemical Oxygen Demand(B005)
3501 Nitrogr-n Anmonia as N (ColAutPhen) Ammonia ltNH3) as N
4104 Chemical Oxygen Demand Chemical Oxygen Demand(COO)
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S
PROJECT L RR LANDFILL
Laboratory Sample ID 200950-4 Date Received 04252002 Time Received 0905
SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS MDL RL
41 0084 10
i-laquo S 012 20(tt w
025 0029 0040
258 360 100
Date05082002
ATTN DAVID FUERST
DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
mgL 5039 042602 0657ddm
mgL 5080 042502 1252 dtn
mgL 5003 042902 1250 JOS
mgL 5204 050602 1440
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 5
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 200950 Date05082002
CUSTOMER0ampM INC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample IDbullSW-S-0t-a3-0a bull Laboratory Sample ID 200950-12 Date Sampled 04252002 ^ Date Received 04262002 Time Sampled 1200 Time Received 0910 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FUGS MDL RL DILUTION UNITS 8ATCH DT DATETIME TECH
3000 Ion Chromatography Analysis Chloride 32 0084 10 mgL 5040 042702 0801 ddn
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 12
Job Nuifcer 200950 L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S
Date05082002
CUSTOMERS 0ampMINC PROJECT I RR LANDFILL ATTN 0AVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID CW DUP 04 23 OS Date Sampled 04252002 Time Sampled 0900 Sample Matrix Water
$wlt-igtup-0ite4ogtshy
toitoiiloy
Laboratory Sample ID Date Received Time Received
200950-13 04262002 0910
TEST METHOO
3000
PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION
Ion Chromatography Analysis Chloride
iSAMPLE RESULT
32
PUGS IOL
0084
RL
10
DILUTION UNITS
mgL
BATCH
5040
DT DATETIKE TECH
042702 0826 ddm
In Description - Dry Wgt Page 13
Job Nunfcer 200950 L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S
Date05082002
CUSTOMER 0amp MINC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN OAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID SW8 04 23 Of Date Sampled 04252002 Time Sampled 1125 tetblztlbXSaople Matrix Water
Laboratory Sample ID 200950-9 Date Received 04262002 Time Received 0910
TEST METHOD
3000
PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION
Ion Chromatography Analysis Chloride
SAMPLE RESULT
33
FUGS HDL
0084
RL
10
DILUTION UNITS
mgL
BATCH
5040
DT DATETIME
042702 0600
TECH
ddm
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 9
RILLIUM INC 356 FARRAGUT CROSSING DR
Consultants in Environmental Chemistry KNOXVILLE TN 37922
(423] 966-8880
June 25 2002 FAX (423) 966-8885 ceriksontrilliuminccom
Mr Dave Fuerst OampM Inc 540 Hopmeadow Street Simsbuiy CT 06070
RE Data Package Review Report - CompuChem SPG D1458 VOCs in Water
Dear Dave
I have completed my evaluation of the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) analysis data prepared by CompuChem Environmental (CompuChem) for one water sample and one trip blank from the LampRR Site The data were reported ina single data package under Sample DeliveryGroup (SDG) D1458 which was received by Trillium for review on May 13 2002 Results for the following samples were reported
MW104A042302 Trip Blank-04-23-02
Analyses wereperformed accordingto EPA Method 8260B(SW-846 Third EditionUpdate III) My evaluation wasbased on thespecificationsof theproject-specific Quality AssuranceProject Plan (QAPP 996) the referenced method and the Region I EPA-New England Data Validation Functional Guidelinesfor Evaluating EnvironmentalAnalyses (1296) Qualifiers consistent with those defined in the Region I document were applied as necessary and appropriate
Although the QAPP specifiesthat Level III datapackages are requiredfor all analysesexcept the 5-year samplingevents fullrawdatadeliverables(iequantitationreports ehromatogramsmass spectra etc) were provided for the samples calibration standards blanks spikes and instrument performance checks These rawdata were notreviewed by Trillium aspartof thisevaluation As specified in Section 92 of the QAPP (page 23) a Level m evaluation limited to an overview of the information provided on the summary forms was performed
Based on the evaluation the following qualifiers were applied
bull Resultsfor 123-trichloropropaneinMW104A042302and TripBlank-04-23-02were rejected (R) based on unacceptably low relative response factors in the initial and continuing calibration standards
HOME OFFICE 28 GRACES DRIVE bull COA7ESVILLE PA19320 bull (610)383-7233 bull FAX (610) 383-7907
OFFICES IN LOUISIANA bull MARYLAND bull NEW JERSEY bull NORTH CAROLINA bull PENNSYLVANIA bull TENNESSEE bull TEXAS
Job Number 200950 L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S
Date05082002
CUSTOMERO amp H INC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID -6W 10 04 23 02 Date Sampled 04252002
Time Sampled 1050 Sample Matrix Water
A
Laboratory Sample ID 200950-8 Date Received 04262002 Time Received 0910
TEST METHOO
3000
PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION
Ion Chromatography Analysis Chloride
SAMPLE RESULT
38
FUGS HDL
0084
RL
10
DILUTION UNITS
mgL
BATCH
5040
DT DATETIME
042702 0448
TECH
ddm
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 8
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 200950 Date05082002
CUSTOMER0amp H INC PROJECTL RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID QW 16 Q4-23-02 Laboratory Sample ID 200950-11 Date Sampled 04252002 ZZ Date Received 04262002 Time Sampled 1045 Time Received 0910 Sanple Matrix Water
TEST KETH00 PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS HDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
3000 Ion Chromatography Analysis Chloride 48 0084 10 mgL 5040 042702 0737 ddn
i
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 11
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nmfcer 200950 0ate05082002
CUSTOMER O S M INC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Custodier Sample ID 4iCH-3-04-a3-0a Laboratory Sample ID 200950-10 Date Sanpled 04252002 Date Received 04252002 Time Sampled 0938 Time Received 0910 Sample Matrix Water
TEST TCTHCD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS HgtL RL OILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
3000 Ion Chromatography Analysis Chloride 19 0084 10 mgL 5040 042702 0713 ddn
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 10
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 200950 Date05082002
CUSTOMER0ampMINC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID-Will 4a04laquo3 U2 Laboratory Sanple ID 200950-7 Date Sampled 04252002 flat Date Received 04262002 Time Sampled 0945 Time Received 0910 Sample Matrix Water
TEST KETHOO PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS KDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIKE TECH
3000 Ion Chromatography Analysis Chloride 49 0084 10 mgL 5040 042702 1027 ddm
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 7
356 FARRAGUT CROSSING ORFRILLIUM INC KNOXVILLE TN 37922
Consultants in EnvironmentalChemistry (423) 966-8880
FAX (423) 966-8885 cerik8ontrilliuminccom
June 212002
Mr Dave Fuerst OampM Inc 540 Hopmeadow Street Simsbury CT 06070
RE Data Package Review Report - STL Connecticut Report No 200950 - Total Iron in Water
Dear Dave
I have completed my evaluation of the inorganics analysis data (total iron) prepared by the Severn Trent Laboratory (STL) inShelton Connecticut for five water samples from the LampRRSite These datawere reportedina singledata packageunder STLConnecticut Report No 200950which was received by Trillium for review on May 162002 The following samples were reported
MW-CW-5B-4-23-02 MW-102A-4-23-02 MW-104A-4-23-02 MW-CW-7A-4-23-02 MW-DUP1-04-23-02
Analyses were performedaccording toEPA Method6010Bthis methodis foundin theThird Edition ofSW-846 Update HI Myevaluation wasbased on the specificationsof the project-specific Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP 996) the referenced methods and the USEPA Region I Laboratory Data Validation FunctionalGuidelinesfor EvaluatingInorganicsAnalyses (688Rev 289) Qualifiers consistent with those defined in the Region I document were applied as necessary and appropriate
As specified in Section 92 of the QAPP (page 23) a Level III evaluation limited to an overview of the information provided on the summary forms was performed No raw data were included in the data package
Based on the evaluation all sample results were determined to be valid as reported No qualifiers were applied to these data by the evaluator
HOME OFFICE 28 GRACES DRIVE bull COATESV1LLE PA19320 bull (610)383-7233 bull FAX (610) 383-7907
OFFICES IN LOUISIANA bull MARYLAND bull NEW JERSEY bull NORTH CAROLINA bull PENNSYLVANIA bull TENNESSEE bull TEXAS
frRILLIUNL
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Connecticut Report No 200950 (Total Iron in Water) June 212002 Paee 2 of 4
Laboratory Test Results forms for all samples are included as Attachment A to this report Region I qualifier definitions are also provided in this attachment
At the discretion of the data user the following points may warrant attention by laboratory personnel with regard to this data package andor prior to future sampling events at this site
bull Sample pHs on laboratory receipt should be documented directly on all chain of custody records
bull Documentation supporting the specified method detection limits (MDLs) should be included in the data package (ie similar to a CLP Form X)
Specific details regarding the review and evaluation of these data are discussed below
Holding Times Preservation andSample Integrity A copy of the applicable chain of custody (COC) record was included in the data package documenting a sample collection date of42402 Physical preservation of the samples with ice was recorded by the sampler and acceptable temperatures (39degC and 46degC) on laboratory receipt were documented on the COC
Acidification ofthe samplesfor totaliron analysis withnitric acid was recorded by the sampler onthe COC Documentationof samplepHs waspresent onthe STLCTPreservative RecordHowever this record givesno indication that bothfiltered and unfihered sampleswere provided(total and dissolved arsenic and lead analyses were also requested on these samples) and does not specify the analyses intended for the samples preserved withdifferent chemicals Asingle STL Connecticut identification number is listed for each sample andpHlt2 is indicated for eachsample preserved with nitric acid A sample digestion log which often includes pH information was not included in the data package For the purposesof thisevaluation it wasassumed that thenotations onthe preservative logreferred to the samples for both total and dissolved metals analyses and no further action was taken on this basis
Total iron analyses were performed on 5702 well within the6-month holding timespecified by the QAPP
Calibrations Based on the analysis dates and times provided on the summary forms initial and continuing calibration verification (ICVCCV) standards were run at appropriate frequencies throughout the ICP(inductively coupled plasma)analysis serieson 5702 All ICVCCV recoveries documented on the summary forms were acceptable (QC 90-110)
BlanksBased on theanalysis datesand times provided onthe summary forms initial and continuing calibration blanks (ICBCCBs) were run at appropriate frequencies throughout the 5702 ICP
frRILLIUMbdquoc
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Connecticut Report No 200950 (Total Iron in Water) June 212002 Page 3 of 4
analysis series Iron was not found above the laboratory-specified method detection limit (MDL) in any of the ICBCCBs
A water-matrix method blank (MB) wasalso analyzed for total iron Iron was detected at 898 pgL in this MB All associated sample results were greater than five times this concentration therefore no action was necessary on this basis
InterferenceCheckSamples Results for two interference check sample pairs one at the beginning and one at the end of the applicable analysis series were reported in the data package Acceptable recoveries (QC 80-120) were reported for iron in all of these quality control analyses
Laboratory ControlSamplesResults for a laboratory control sample analyzed for total iron with this sample set were reported in the data package An acceptable recovery (103 QC 80-120) was reported
Duplicate Analysis Sample MW-CW-5B-4-23-02 was analyzed in duplicate by the laboratory Paired results for iron showed excellent reproducibility (42 relative percent difference [RPD] QC ^20) as reported on the summary form
MatrixSpikeAnalysisSample MW-CW-5B-4-23-02 was prepared and analyzed as a matrix spike for total iron An acceptable recovery (80 QC 75-125) was reported for this quality control analysis
SerialDilutionSerialdilutionanalysis wasperformed onsample MW-104A-4-23-02 Anacceptable percent difference of 44 was reported for the 5-fold diluted analysis result as compared to the original undiluted analysis result (QC lt10)
SampleResults No documentation to support the laboratory-specified MDL for total iron (853 pgL) or the date on which it was established was provided in the data package A reporting limit (RL) of 200 pgL was also specified on each of the Laboratory Test Results forms All reported sample resultswere greaterthan the laboratory-specified RLtherefore a Iess-thanvalue applicable to non-detected values is not relevant to this data set
Field Duplicates MW-DUP1-4-23-02 was identified as a field duplicate of MW-102A-4-23-02 based on information provided by the client Very good reproducibility (118 relative percent difference [RPD]) was demonstrated for total iron in these paired sample analyses
Totalversus DissolvedConcentrations Analyses for dissolved iron were not performed on these samples
^ TRILLIUM
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of STL Connecticut Report No 200950 (Total Iron in Water) June 212002 Page 4 of 4
DocumentationA COC record provided in the data package included allfive reported samples and was property completed with the following exceptions
bull Improper corrections were noted In the future all corrections should be made by drawing a single line through the incorrect information inserting the correct information and initialing and dating the change Obliterations write-overs and unsigned cross-outs are not legally defensible
bull No shipment informationwasrecorded Boththecourier nameand theapplicable airbill number should be recorded on all COCs
Pages 102-105 of the data package are summary forms for four STD analysis all of which were run at thestart of theapplicable analysis series and were NDfor iron These runshave no apparent relevance to the sample results in this data set and were not further considered in the evaluation
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this data package review report
Sincerely
CmUd mdash Carol A Erikson Quality Assessment Manager
CAEpsn April2002Total Iron(95406)
frRILLIUNLc
ATTACHMENT A
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS STL Connecticut Report No 200950
EPA Region IQualifierDefinitions
U - The material was analyzed for but was not detected above the level of the associated value The associated value is either the samplequantitation limit or the sample detection limit
J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity
R - The data are unusable (Note Analyte may or may not be present)
UJ - The material was analyzed for but was not detected The associated value is an estimate and may be inaccurate or imprecise
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nunber 200950 Date05082002
CUSTOMER 0amp H INC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID MU-102A-4-23-02 Laboratory Sample ID 200950-2 Date Sampled 04242002 Date Received 04252002 Time Sampled 1240 Time Received 0905 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FUGS MDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
6010B Metals Analysis (ICAP Trace) Iron 35000 853 200 ugL 5254 050702 1418 nnp
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 3
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nunber 200950 Date05082002
CUSTOMER 0amp M INC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID MW-DUP1-4-23-02 Laboratory Sample ID 200950-5 Date Sampled 04242002 Date Received 04252002 Time Sampled 0900 Time Received 0905 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METH00 PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS MDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
6010B Metals Analysis (ICAP Trace) Iron 31100 853 200 ugL 5254 050702 1442 nnp
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 6
C
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nunber 200950 Date05082002
CUSTOMER 0amp M INC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID MW-104A-4-23-02 Laboratory Sample ID 200950-3 Date Sampled 04242002 Date Received 04252002 Time Sampled 1415 Time Received 0905 Sample Matrix Water
TEST HETHOO PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FUGS MDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
6010B Metals Analysis (ICAP Trace) Iron 65800 853 200 ugL 5254 050702 1424 nnp
r~
In Description = Dry Ugt Page 4
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Nunber 200950 Date05082002
CUSTOMER0ampgtr RC^ PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN OAVID FUERST
Customer Sample 10 Date Sanpled Time Sanpled
MW-CU-5B-4-23-02 04242002 1045
Laboratory Sample ID 200950-1 Date Received 04252002 Time Received 0905
Sample Matrix uater
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FUGS MDL RL DILUTION UNITS BATCH DT DATETIME TECH
601OB Metals Analysis (ICAP Trace) Iron 2420 853 200 ugL 5254 050702 1336 nnp
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 2
L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S Job Number 200950 Date05082002
CUSTOMER 0amp M INC PROJECT L RR LANDFILL ATTN DAVID FUERST
Customer Sample ID MW-CW-7A-4-23-02 Laboratory Sample ID 200950-4 Date Sampled 04242002 Date Received 04252002 Time Sampled 1540 Time Received 0905 Sample Matrix Water
TEST METHOD PARAMETERTEST DESCRIPTION SAMPLE RESULT FLAGS MDL RL DILUTION UNITS 8ATCK DT DATETIME TECH
601OB Metals Analysis (ICAP Trace) Iron 8940 853 200 ugL 5254 050702 1436 nnp
In Description = Dry Wgt Page 5
OampMInc Environmental Operations and
Maintenance Management
Appendix C
Groundwater Data Validation Reports CompuChem Environmental Laboratories
TRILLIUMraquoc
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of CompuChem SDG D1458 (VOCs in Water) June 252002 Page 2 of 6 ___
bull Results for acetone in MW104A042302 and Trip Blank-04-23-02 were qualified as less than the reported values based onassociated method blank contamination and as estimated based on unacceptably low relative response factors in the initial and continuing calibration standards (UJ)
bull Results for 12-dibromo-3-chloropropane hexachlorobutadiene and naphthalene in MW104A042302 and Trip Blank-04-23-02 and for isopropylbenzene and pshyisopropyltoluene in MW104A042302 were qualified as estimated (J UJ) based on unacceptable percent relative standard deviations inthe associated initial calibration
bull The result for 124-trichlorobenzene in MW104A042302 was qualified as less than the sample-specific reporting limit based on associated method blank contamination and as estimated based on an unacceptable percent relative standard deviation in the associated initial calibration (UJ)
bull The result for 2-butanone in Trip Blank-04-23-02 wasrejected (R) and the result for 2-butanone in MW104A042302 was qualified as estimated (J) based on an unacceptably low relative response factor in the associated continuing calibration standard
bull Results for trichloroethene in MW104A042302 and Trip Blank-04-23-02 were qualified as less than the sample-specific reporting limit based on associated method blank contamination and as estimated based on an unacceptably high percent difference in the associated continuing calibration standard (UJ)
bull Results for methylene chloride in MW104A042302and Trip Blank-04-23-02 andfor benzene toluene and 124-trimethylbenzene in TripBlank-04-23-02 were qualified as less than the sample-specific reporting limit or less than the reported value whichever was greater (U) based on associated method blank contamination
These qualifiersare reflected onthe affected OrganicAnalysis DataSheets (FormI) included as Attachment A to this report Region I qualifier definitions are also provided in this attachment
No matrix spikematrix spike duplicate analyses were reported in association with this data package SW-846 requires the analysis of at least one matrix spike and one duplicate unspiked sample or one matrix spikematrix spike duplicate (MSMSD) pair with each batch of up to 20 samplesofthesame matrixprocessed together(Method 8000BSection85)Project-specific QC was notindicated on theCOC for thissampling eventand the narrative inthe data package indicates that these quality controlanalyses were not performed at theclients requestNo action was taken by the evaluator on this basis
-4 ITRILLIUM
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of CompuChem SDG D1458 (VOCs in Water) June 252002 Page 3 of 6
Details regarding the review and evaluation of these data are discussed below
HoldingTimes PreservationSampleIntegrity A copyofthe field chain ofcustody (COC) record was included in the data package documenting a collection date of42402 An acceptable (4degC plusmn2degC) cooler temperature (5degC) on laboratory receipt was recorded on the COC Acidification of the samplesfor volatilesanalysiswith hydrochloricacid wasdocumented by thesampler onthe COC and successful acidification of both samples (pH=l) was confirmed on the Water Batch Sheet prepared by the laboratory and included in the data package
Volatile organics analyses were performedon 42902 wellwithin the 14-day holding time required for chemically preserved water samples
GCMSInstrument Performance Check Form V was provided for two bromofluorobenzene (BFB) performancechecks runon instrument HP73in associationwith thereported sample analyses Reported mass abundances were acceptable for both performance checks
Calibration Form VI was provided for an initial calibration (IC) performed on 422-2302 which established a calibration range of 05-25 pgL for most target analytes Acetone 2-butanone and 4shymethyl-2-pentanone were in the standards at five times these concentrations Reported average relative response fectors (RRFs) werebelow theminimumacceptable value (005)for acetone(0030) and 123-trichloropropane(0048) Resultsfor 123-trichloropropanein MW104A042302and Trip Blank-04-23-02 were rejected (R) on this basis Acetone was detected in both samples therefore results for acetone in MW104A042302 and Trip Blank- 04-23-02 were qualified as estimated (J) based on the low average RRF
Percent relative standard deviations (RSDs) were less than the maximum method-specified acceptance limit (15) with the following exceptions
acetone - 410 l2-dibromo-3-chioropropane - 404 styrene-166 124-trichlorobenzene - 239 isopropylbenzene -175 hexachlorobutadiene - 325 sec-butylbenzene -198 naphthalene - 188 p-isopropyltoluene - 234 123-trichlorobenzene -195 n-butylbenzene - 296
In evaluating this IC the laboratory exercised an option included in Method 8000B (which contains calibration requirements forMethod 8260B) that allows calculationofthe mean RSD value for all of theanalytes in thecalibration standards If themean RSD is lessthan 15 then(1) the IC may still be considered acceptable even if one or more individual RSDs exceeds15 and (2) the mean RRFs from the IC may be used for calculation of all sample results rather than having to use regression analysesto generate calibration curvesfor individual target analyteswith RSDs greater
frRILLIUNLc
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of CompuChem SDG D1458 (VOCs in Water) June 25 2002 Page 4 of 6
than 15 This calculation was documented in the data package and a mean RSD of 86 was reported by the laboratory This is however a contractualmethod compliance issue since the evaluationeffort focusesonthe individualanalyte responsesin determining whether or notassociated sample results require qualification the use of the mean RSD by the laboratory to evaluate the IC has no direct bearing on the data evaluation effort
For styrenesec-butylbenzene n-butylbenzeneand 123-trichlorobenzenepositive resultswere not reported ineither sampleand theRSDs didnot exceedthe less-restrictivecriterion of30 specified by the validation guidance document Therefore no qualifiers were applied to any of the sample results for these compounds on thisbasis Positive resultsfor isopropylbenzene p-isopropyholuene and 124-trichlorobenzene were not reportedinTripBlank-04-23-02 and theRSDs did notexceed 30 therefore results for these compounds in this sample were not qualified on this basis Results for acetone were previouslyqualified based on low RRFs and no further action waswarranted based onthe highRSD Resultsfor 12-dibromo-3-chloropropane hexachlorobutadieneand naphthalene in both samples and for isopropylbenzene p-isopropyltoluene and 124-trichlorobenzene in MW104A042302 were qualified as estimated (JUJ) based on the unacceptable RSD values
Form VII wasprovided for a singlecontinuing calibration(CC) standard (42902-0824) associated with these sample analysesRRFs were acceptable (greater than 005) in the CC except for acetone (0023) 2-butanone (0046) and 123-trichloropropane (0045) Results for acetone and 123shytrichloropropane were previously qualified based on similar responses in theIC no additionalaction was taken with respect to these analytes based on the CC results The result for 2-butanone in Trip Blank-04-23-02 was rejected (R) and the result for 2-butanone in MW104A-042302 was qualified as estimated (J) based on the unacceptably low RRF in the associated CC standard
Reported percent differences (Ds) from the IC were less than the maximum method-specified acceptance criterion of 20 except for acetone (224) and trichloroethene (468) Acetone was previously qualified based on unacceptably low RRFs and no additionalaction was warranted based on the high D value Resultsfor trichloroethene in MW104A042302 and Trip Blank-042302 were qualified as estimated (J UJ) because the D value exceeded the less-restrictive criterion of 25 specified by the validation guidance document
Blanks Results for a method blank (MB VBLKYU) associated with the site sample analyses were provided inthe data reportThe followingtarget analyteswere reported onthe FormI for VBLKYU
acetone -1 pgL 135-trimethylbenzene - 003 pgL methylene chloride - 01 pgL 124-trimethylbenzene - 004 pgL trans-12-dichloroethene - 004 pgL sec-butylbenzene - 004 pgL benzene - 003 pgL p-isopropyltoluene - 005 pgL trichloroethene - 005 pgL n-butylbenzene - 006 pgL toluene - 008 pgL 124-trichlorobenzene - 008 pgL
TRILLIUMbdquoc
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of CompuChem SDG DJ458 (VOCs in Water) June 252002 Page 5 of 6
chlorobenzene - 002 pgL 123-trichlorobenzene - 006 pgL 4-chlorotohiene - 005 pgL total-12-dichloroethene - 004 pgL
Resultsfor acetonemethylenechlorideand trichloroethene in MW104A042302 and TripBlank-04shy23-02 for benzene toluene and 124-trimethylbenzene in Trip Blank-04-23-02 and for 124shytrichlorobenzene in MW104A042302 were qualified as less than the sample-specific reporting limit or less than the reported value whichever was greater (U) based on the MB contamination All sample results were less than ten times (acetone and methylene chloride) or five times (all other compounds) the MB concentration before adjustment for the dilution factor where applicable The remaining compounds listed above were greater than the action level for qualification or were not detected therefore no further action was necessary based on the method blank contamination
One tripblank (Trip Blank-04-23-02) was submitted with thisdata set After qualifications based on laboratory blank contamination mp-xylenes (006 pgL) naphthalene (02 pgL) and total xylenes (007 pgL) were reported in TripBlank-04-23-02 Results forall threeanalytes in MW104A042302 were greater than five times the TB concentrations prior to adjustment for the dilution factor Therefore no action was warranted based on trip blank contamination
System Monitoring Compounds Reported recoveries (Form II) of the four system monitoring compounds (SMCs) were acceptable for all reported sample and quality control analyses
MatrixSpikeMatrixSpikeDuplicateNo matrix spikeanalyses were performed in association with this data set
LaboratoryControlSample Results for a laboratory control sample were reported on Form m in the data package Recoveries (88-106) for the five spiked target analytes (11-dichloroethene benzene trichloroethene toluene and chlorobenzene) were within the laboratory-specified control limits found on this form
FieldDuplicate No field duplicate pair was included in this data package
InternalStandardResponses Internal standard (IS) areasand retention times(RTs) were reported on Form VHI for all sample analysesreported in this data set and the related QC analyses all areas and RTs were within acceptable limits
SampleResultsResults forMW104A042302and TripBlank-04-23-02wereappropriatelyreported on Form Is each of which indicated the appropriate analysis date and a sample analysis volume of 25 mL The Form I for MW104A042302 also indicated a dilution factor of five which was appropriate based on the reported concentrations of several target analytes According to the narrative the dilution factor for this sample was based on odor no undiluted analysis results were reported for MW104A042302
^ TRILLIUM Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of CompuChem SDG D1458 (VOCs in Water) June 252002 Page 6 of 6
Reporting limits for target analytes that were not detected were correctly reported as equivalent to the lowest concentration IC standard analyzed and where applicable were adjusted for the dilution factor
Documentation Data packagedocumentationwas inconsistentwiththe specificationsof the QAPP specifically a Level IV packagewas provided when aLevel III package wasrequired The feet that additional documentation (Le the raw data) was included does not adversely affect the reported sample results but pursuant to the validation specifications for this project it was not reviewed by Trillium as part of this evaluation
A COC record provided in the data package included both reported samples and was properly completed except that the methodofshipment wasnot clearlyrecorded by thesampler andlaboratory receipt was not fully documented FedEx was recorded in the first Received by space but CompuChem was recorded in the associated Company Name space Presumably the date and time also recorded here reflect the time of arrival at the laboratory since no other signature information is included Although it is a good idea to include FedEx in the signature trail on the COC it must be reflected as hofr aReceived by and a subsequent Relinquished by notation to be complete and accurate The laboratory receipt signature should follow as thefinal Received by signature
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this data package review report
Sincerely
Carol A Erikson Quality Assessment Manager
CAEpsn April 2002VoaCC (95406)
TRILLIUM
ATTACHMENT A
ORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEETS (Form I) SDG D1458
Volatiles in Water
EPA Region IQualifierDefinitions
U - The materialwasanalyzed for but was not detected The associated numerical value is the sample quantitation limit The sample quantitation limit accounts forsample-specificdilution factorsand percentsolidscorrectionsorsamplesizes that deviate from those required by the method
J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity
R - The data are unusable (analyte may or may not be present) Resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification The R replaces the numerical value or sample quantitation limit
UJ - The analyte was analyzed for but was not detected The sample quantitation limit is an estimated quantity
CLIENT SAMPLE NOFORM 1 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Method 8260BLab Name COMPUCHEM
SDG No D1458Lab Code LIBRTY Case No SAS No
Lab Sample ID D1458-1Matrix (soilwater) WATER
Sample wtvol 25 (gml) ML Lab File ID D1458-1A73
Date Received 042502Level (lowmed) LOW
Date Analyzed 042902 Moisture not dec
Dilution Factor 50GC Column ZB-624 ID 032 (mm)
Soil Aliquot Volume (uLSoil Extract Volume (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS
COMPOUND (ugL or ugKg) UGLCAS NO
75-71-8 bullDichlorodifluoromethane
74-87-3 -Chloromethane_
75-01-4 -Vinyl Chloride
74-83-9 bullBromomethane
75-00-3 -Chloroethane
75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane
75-35-4 11-Dichloroethene
cpound7-64-l Acetone
75-09-2 Methylene Chloride
156-60-5 trans-12-Dichloroethene
75-34-3 1l-Dichloroethane_
594-20-7 22-Dichloropropane
156-59-2 cis-12-Dichloroethene
78-93-3 2-butanone
74-97-5 Bromochloromethane_
67-66-3 Chloroform
71-55-6 111-Trichloroethane
56-23-5 Carbon Tetrachloride
563-58-6 11-dichloropropene
71-43-2 Benzene
107-06-2 12-Dichloroethane
79-01-6 Trichloroethene
78-87-5 12-Dichloropropane
74-95-3 Dibromomethane
75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane
108-10-1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone^
108-88-3 Toluene
79-00-5 112-Trichloroethane
127-18-4 -Tetrachloroethene
142-28-9 bull13-Dichloropropane_
124-48-1 -Dibromochloromethane
106-93-4 bull12-Dibromoethane
108-90-7 -Chlorobenzene
FORM I VOA
55
CLIENT SAMPLE NOFORM 1 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name COMPUCHEM Method 8260B
Lab Code LIBRTY Case No SAS No SDG NO D1458
Matrix (soilwater) WATER Lab Sample ID D1458-1
Sample wtvol
Leve1 (1owmed)
Moisture not dec
GC Column ZB-624
Soil Extract Volume
CAS NO
630-20-6
100-41-4
108-38-3 95-47- 6
100-42-5
75-25-2
98-82-8
108-86-1
96-18-4
79-34-5
103-65-1
95-49-8
106-43-4
108-67-8
98-06-6
95-63-6
135-98-8 541-73-1
106-46-7
99-87-6
95-50-1
104-51-8
96-12-8
120-82-1
87-68-3
91-20-3
87-61-6
540-59-0
1330-20-7--shy
25 (gml) ML
LOW
ID 032 (mm)
(uL)
COMPOUND
Lab File ID D1458-1A73
Date Received 042502
Date Analyzed 042902
Dilution Factor 50
Soil Aliquot Volume (uL
CONCENTRATION UNITS
(ugL or ugKg) UGL
1112-Tetrachloroethane
Ethylbenzene
mp-Xylene
o-Xylene __
Styrene
Bromoform Isopropyl Benzene
Bromobenzene
123-Trichloropropane 1122-Tetrachloroethane
n-Propyl Benzene 2-Chioroto1uene
4-Chlorotoluene
135-Trimethyl Benzene tert-Butyl Benzene^
124-Trimethyl Benzene^
sec-Butyl Benzene
13-Dichlorobenzene 14-Dichlorobenzene
p-Isopropyl Toluene
12-Dichlorobenzene
n-Butyl Benzene 12-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
124-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Naphthalene 123-Trichlorobenzene
12-Dichloroethene (total)
Xylene (total)
3
110 110 52
3
3
22 05
4 2 3 17
3
43
3
1 42
10 7
3
3 $3
65
3
5
170
U
)sect
J
U
i
J
yen~T u _jtriur yuar i
4 v
sect
FORM I VOA
56
CLIENT SAMPLE NOFORM 1 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TRIPBLANKO42302 Method 8260BLab Name COMPUCHEM
catSDG NO D1458SAS NoLab Code LIBRTY Case No tfwlor
Lab Sample ID D1458-2Matrix (soilwater) WATER
Lab File ID D1458-2A73Sample wtvol 25 (gml) ML
Date Received 042502Level (lowmed) LOW
Date Analyzed 042902 Moisture not dec
Dilution Factor 10GC Column ZB-624 ID 032 (mm)
Soil Aliquot Volume (uLSoil Extract Volume (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS COMPOUND (ugL or ugKg) UGL QCAS NO
-Dichlorodifluoromethane 74-87-3 bullChloromethane_ 75-01-4 -Vinyl Chloride 74-83-9 -Bromomethane 75-00-3 -Chloroethane 75-69-4
75-71-8
Trichlorofluorometnane 75-35-4 bull11-Dichloroethene 67-64-1 bullAcetone 75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 156-60-5 trans-12-Dichloroethene 75-34-3 bull1l-Dichloroethane_ 594-20-7 bull22-Dichloropropane 156-59-2 bullcis-12-Dichloroethene 78-93-3 bull2-butanone 74-97-5 bullBromochloromethane 67-66-3 -Chloroform 71-55-6 bull111-Trichloroethane 56-23-5 -Carbon Tetrachloride 563-58-6 bull11-dichloropropene 71-43-2 -Benzene
05107-06-2 bull12-Dichloroethane 79-01-6 -Trichloroethene 06 004 78-87-5 -12-Dichloropropane 74-95-3 bullDibromomethane 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane 108-10-1 4-Methy1-2-pentanone 108-88-3 bullToluene
U79-00-5 -112-Trichloroethane U-Tetrachloroethene127-18-4 U142-28-9 -13-Dichloropropane_ U-Dibromochloromethane124-48-1 U106-93-4 -12-Dibromoethane U108-90-7 -Chlorobenzene
FORM 1 VOA
95
CLIENT SAMPLE NOFORM 1 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name COMPUCHEM Method 8260B
SAS No SDG No D1458Lab Code LIBRTY Case No
Matrix (soilwater) WATER Lab Sample ID D1458-2
Sample wtvol 25 (gml) ML Lab File ID D1458-2A73
Level (lowmed) LOW Date Received 042502
Moisture not dec Date Analyzed 042902
GC Column ZB-624 ID 032 (mm) Dilution Factor 10
Soil Extract Volume (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume
CONCENTRATION UNITS CAS NO COMPOUND (ugL or ugKg) UGL
630-20-6 100-41-4 108-38-3 95-47-6 100-42-5 75-25-2 98-82-8 108-86-1
96-18-4 79-34-5 103-65-1 95-49-8 106-43-4 108-67-8 98-06-6 95-63-6 135-98-8 541-73-1 106-46-7 99-87-6 95-50-1 104-51-8 96-12-8 120-82-1
87-68-3 91-20-3 87-61-6 540-59-0 1330-20-7--shy
1112-Tetrachloroethane Ethylbenzene mp-Xylene o-Xylene Styrene Bromoform Isopropyl Benzene Bromobenzene 123-Trichloropropane 1122-Tetrachloroethane n-Propyl Benzene 2-Chlorotoluene_ 4-Chlorotoluene 135-Trimethyl Benzene tert-Butyl Benzene | 124-Trimethyl Benzene sec-Butyl Benzene j 13-Dichlorobenzene 14-Dichlorobenzene p-Isopropyl Toluene 12-Dichlorobenzene n-Butyl Benzene 12-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane_ 124-Trichlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene
mdashNaphthalene^ 123-Trichlorobenzene ~~ 12-Dichloroethene (total) Xylene (total)
FORM I VOA
96
rRILLIUMiNc 356 FARRAGUT CROSSING DR
Consultants in Environmental Chemistry KNOXVILLE TN 37922 [423] 966-8880
FAX [423] 966-8B85 cerik8ontrilliuminccom
June 252002
Mr Dave Fuerst OampM Inc 540 Hopmeadow Street Simsbury CT 06070
RE Data Package Review Report - CompuChem SPG D1458 Chloride and Ammonia in Water
Dear Dave
I have completed my evaluation of the wet chemistry analysis data (chloride and ammonia) prepared by CompuChemEnvironmental forone watersample from the LampRRSite Thesedata were reported in asingle data package underCompuChem Sample Delivery Group (SDG)D1458 which was received by Trillium for review on May 132002 Results for sample MW104A042302 were reported
Analyses were performed accordingto EPAMethods 3000(chloride) and 3501(ammonia) bothmethodsare found wMethodsfor ChemicalAnalysisof Waterand Wastes(EPA-6004-79-020 383) Note that the method used for chloride is different from the method specified on the chain of custody record (EPA 325) My evaluation was based on the specifications of the project-specific Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP 996) the referenced methods and to the extent applicable the USEPA Region I Laboratory Data Validation Functional Guidelinesfor Evaluating Inorganics Analyses (688 Rev 289) Qualifiers consistent with those defined in the Region I document were applied as necessary and appropriate
Based on the evaluation the sample results for both parameters were determined to be valid as reported no qualifiers wereapplied to these data by the evaluatorThe laboratory reporting form is included as Attachment A to this report Region I qualifier definitions are also provided in this attachment
Details regarding the review and evaluation of these data are discussed below
Holding Times Preservation andSampleIntegrity A copy of the field chain of custody (COC) record was included in the CompuChem data package documenting a sample collection date of 42402 Anacceptable coolertemperature (5degC) wasdocumented onthe field COC by CompuChem on receipt of the samples
HOME OFFICE 28 GRACES DRIVE bull COATESVILLE PA19320 bull (610)383-7233 bull FAX (610) 383-7907
OFFICES IN LOUISIANA bull MARYLAND bull NEW JERSEY bull NORTH CAROLINA bull PENNSYLVANIA bull TENNESSEE bull TEXAS
^ TRILLIUMraquoc
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of CompuChem SDG D1458 (Chloride and Ammonia in Water) June 252002 Page 2 of 3
Chemical preservation of the sample intended for ammonia analysis using sulfuric acid was documented on theCOC record SamplepH onlaboratory receipt was not recorded onthe COC but an acceptable pH (lt2) for this sample was noted on CompuChems receiving log
The sample was analyzed for chloride on 5102 and for ammonia on 5602 these are both within the 28-day holding time specified by the QAPP for both parameters
Calibrations Summary results for aseven-point calibration curve run on 5602 were found in the data package anacceptable correlation coefficient (QC 0995) was reported for the best-fit linear regression describing this curve Based on the run log provided initial and continuing calibration verification (ICVCCV) standards were run at the appropriate frequencies throughout the analysis series for ammonia All ICVCCV recoveries for this analysis parameter were acceptable (QC 85shy115)
Summary results for a six-point calibration curverun on42302 were found in the data packagean acceptable correlationcoefficient was reported for the best-fit linear regressiondescribing thiscurve Based on the run log provided ICVCCV standards were run at the appropriate frequencies throughout the analysisseries for chloride All ICVCCV recoveriesfor thisanalysis parameter were acceptable (QC 85-115)
Blanks Initialand continuingcalibration blanks(ICBCCBs) wererunat theappropriate frequencies throughout the ammonia and chloride analysis series no target analytes were detected above the applicable reporting limits (RLs) in any of these blanks
A water matrix preparation blank (PBW) was also analyzed with the sample for each parameter no ammonia or chloride was reported in either of the PBW analyses
LaboratoryControlSamplesAcceptable recoveries(929 and 110)for bothanalysis parameters were reported for the laboratory control samples run in association with the site sample
DuplicateAnalysisNo laboratory duplicate analyses were reported for ammonia or chloride
Matrix Spike Analysis MW104A042302 was not prepared and analyzed as a matrix spike for ammonia or chloride
Sample Results Sample results for ammonia and chloride were correctly transcribed from the laboratory run logs including appropriateadjustments for dilution and were appropriately reported on the laboratorys Classical Chemistry Analysis Data Sheet
FTRILLIUNL
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of CompuChem SDG D1458 (Chloride and Ammonia in Water) June 252002 Page 3 of 3
FieldDuplicates No field duplicate was submitted with this site sample
Documentation Data package documentation was complete and acceptable for both analysis parameters
A COC record provided in the data package included the reported sample and was properly completed except thatthe method ofshipment was notclearlyrecorded by thesampler and laboratory receipt was not fully documented FedEx was recorded in the first Received by space but CompuChem was recorded in the associated Company Name space Presumably the date and time also recorded here reflect the time of arrival at the laboratory since no other signature information is included Although it is a good idea to include FedEx in the signature trail on the COC it must be reflected as both a Received by and a subsequent Relinquished by notation to be complete and accurate The laboratory receipt signature should follow as the final Received by signature
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this data package review report
Sincerely
CtoiJL Carol A Erikson Quality Assessment Manager
CAEesc April 2002WetChemCC (95406)
TRILLIUM
ATTACHMENT A
CLASSICAL CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS DATA SHEET CompuChem SDG D1458
EPA Region IQualifierDefinitions
i U bull The material was analyzed for but was not detected above the level of the
associated value The associated value iseither thesample quantitation limit or the sample detection limit
J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity
R - The data are unusable (Note Analyte may or may not be present)
UJ - The material wasanalyzed for but was notdetected The associated value is an estimate and may be inaccurate or imprecise
i
SW-846
1-CC
CLASSICAL CHEMISTRY ANALYSES DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO
MW104A042302
Nameabab CompuChem Contract LampRR
ab Code LIBRTY Case No NRAS No
DG No D1458D
atrix (soilwater) WATER Lab Sample ID D1458-1
ate Received 42502 Solids 000
Concentration Units (mgL or mgkg dry weight) mgL
DATE PARAMETER CONCENTRATION M ANALYZED
Ammonia I 2ITT 5602 Chloride I 294 I 5102
Comments
Form I - CC SW-846
356 FARRAGUT CROSSING DRrRILLIUMINC KNOXVILLE TN 37922
Consultants in Environmental Chemistry (423] 966-6880
FAX (423] 966-8885 cerik8ontrilliuminccom
June 262002
Mr Dave Fuerst OampM Inc 540 Hopmeadow Street Simsbury CT 06070
RE DataPackage Review Report -CET Report Dated 5802 - BOD and COD in Water
Dear Dave
I have completed my evaluation of the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD)data prepared by Chemicalamp EnvironmentalTechnology Inc (CET) under subcontract to CompuChem Environmental for one water sample from the LampRR She The data were reported ina single data package datedMay 82002which was received byTrillium for review on June 252002 Results for sample MW104A042302 were reported
Analysis was performed according to EPA Method 4051 (BOD) and EPA Method 4104 (COD) from Methodsfor ChemicalAnalysis of Water and Wastes (EPA-6004-79-020383) My evaluation was based on the specifications of the project-specific Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP 996) the referenced methods and to the extent applicable the USEPA Region I Laboratory Data Validation FunctionalGuidelinesfor EvaluatingInorganicsA nalyses(688 Rev 289) Qualifiers consistent with those defined in the Region I document were applied as necessary
and appropriate
Based on the evaluation the sample result for BOD was determined to be valid as reported based on the available documentationNo qualifiers were applied to this result by the evaluatorThe sample result forCOD wasqualified asestimated (J)due tolack of supporting documentationfor and the excessive age of the referenced initial calibration
The laboratory reporting form is included as Attachment A to this report Region I qualifier
definitions are also provided in this attachment
Specific details regarding the review and evaluation of these data are discussed below
Holding TimesPreservation andSampleIntegrityA copy of the chain of custody (COC) record transferring theBODand CODsamplesto CETon 42602wasincluded in theCET datareport The
HOME OFFICE 28 GRACES DRIVE bull COATESVILLE PA19320 bull (610)383-7233 bull FAX (610) 383-7907
OFFICES IN LOUISIANA bull MARYLAND bull NEW JERSEY bull NORTH CAROLINA bull PENNSYLVANIA bull TENNESSEE bull TEXAS
froiLLIUMc
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of CET Report Dated 5802 (BOD and COD in Water) June 262002 Page 2 of 3
field COC was not included in this data package but was present in allother data packagesprepared in support of the various analyses of this sample which was collected on 42402
An acceptable (4degC plusmn2degC) cooler temperature (5degC) was documented on the field COC by CompuChem onreceipt ofthesample and anacceptable cooler temperature (1degC) wasalso recorded by CET on the subcontract COC
Chemical preservation of the sample intended for COD analysis using sulfuric acid was documented on the field COC record but not on the subcontract COC record Sample pH on laboratory receipt was not recorded by CET on the subcontract COC or by CompuChem on the field COC but an acceptable pH (lt2) for this sample was noted on CompuChems receiving log Documentation of sample pH was not found anywherein the CETdata packageBased on professional judgment since appropriate preservation was documented at CompuChem no sample results were qualified due to the lack of preservation documentation by CET
BOD incubation was initiated on 42602 which meetsthe holding time requirement of 48 hours for this parameter Five-day BOD readings were appropriately taken on 5102 COD analyses were performed on 5602 well within the 28-day holding time specified by the QAPP
CalibrationsCalibration is not applicable to BOD measurements
COD analyses were performed in a single analysis series on5602 An initial calibration performed on 73001 was referenced on the bench sheet documenting these analyses but no indication of the calibration range or the correlation coefficient for the calibration curve was provided It was also noted that the referenced initial calibration was more than eight months old it is not generally considered good laboratory practice to continue to use a calibration curve for this long a period of time
Check standards at 150 mgL and 750 mgL were run at the start of the COD analysis series and a check standard at 75 mgL was run at the end of the analysis series Acceptable recoveries (QC 85shy115) were reported for the 150 mgL standard (100) and the 750 mgL standard (100) The final result for the 75 mgL standard was not recorded on the bench sheet in the absence of the relevant IC datathis result cannot be calculated by thevalidator Further in theabsence of rawdata for the associated IC none of the standard results could be verified by the validator
Based on professional judgment the result for COD in MW104A042302 was qualified as estimated (J)due to thelack ofdocumentationsupporting thereferenced IC the excessive age ofthe referenced IC and the lack of complete documentation of the supporting check standard results
^TRILIJLJMC Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of CET Report Dated 5802 (BOD and COD in Water) June 262002 Page 3 of 3
BlanksEntries for seed blanks found onthe BODrun logindicated that no significantcontamination was found
No COD was detected in a blank analysis performed on the same date that the sample was analyzed
LaboratoryControlSamplesAcceptable recoveries for BOD (108 and 109) were reported for two spiked analyses run in association with the site sample
No laboratory control sample was reported (or run based on the bench sheet) for COD
DuplicateAnalysisNo laboratory duplicate analyses were reported for BOD or COD
MatrixSpikeAnalysisMW104A042302 wasnot prepared and analyzed as amatrix spike for BOD or COD
SampleResults Sample results for BOD and COD were correctly transcribed from the raw data provided by the laboratory and appropriately reported on the reporting form
FieldDuplicates No field duplicate was submitted with this site sample
Documentation Data package documentation was complete and acceptable for BOD
No IC summary results or raw data for COD were provided in the data package It may be that the IC data are not routinely printed in hard copy form by the laboratory when they are generated However since the reported sampleresults cannot be verified in theabsence of these data summary information at a minimum (Le the calibration range and correlation coefficient) must be provided in the data package when evaluation is required
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this data package review report
Sincerely
Carol A Erikson Quality Assessment Manager
CAEpac April 2002BODCODcc (95406)
^TRILLIUM
ATTACHMENT A
LABORATORY REPORTING FORM CET Report Dated May 82002
EPA Region IQualifierDefinitions
U - The material was analyzed for but was not detected above the level of the associated value The associated valueiseither thesample quantitation limit or the sample detection limit
J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity
R - The data are unusable (Note Analyte may or may not be present)
UJ - The materialwasanalyzed for but was not detected Theassociated value is an estimate and may be inaccurate or imprecise
chemicalamp environmental technologyinc
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL SERVICES
FINAL REPORT OF ANALYSES
COMPUCHEM Attn DIANE BYRD 501 MADISON AVENUE REPORT DATE 050702
CARY NC 27513shy
SAMPLE MATRIX- WWSAMPLE NUMBER- 196480 SAMPLE ID- MW 104A042302 TIME SAMPLED- 1415DATE SAMPLED- 042402 RECEIVED BY- ALTDATE RECEIVED- 042602 SAMPLER- NOT SPECIFIED
TIME RECEIVED- 1340 DELIVERED BY- JAMES FELDHAUS
Page 1 of 1 PROJECT NAME L amp RR
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS METHOD DATE BY RESULT UNITS PQL
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND EPA 4051 042602 LEB 9 mgL 2
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND EPA 4104 050602 HLH 189 mgL J 10
PQL bull Practical Quantitation Limit Results followed by the letter J are estimated concentrations
NC DENR CERTIFICATIONS DWQ - 96 PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY - 37724
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
PO Box 12298 bull Research Wangle Park NC 27709 Shipping 102-A Woodwinds Industrial Court bull Cary NC 27511
Telephone (919) 467-3090 Fax(919) 467-3515
INC 356 FARRAGUT CROSSING DRrRILLIUM KNOXVILLE TN 37922Consultants in Environmental Chemistry
(423) 966-8880 FAX (423) 966-8885
cerik8ontrilliuminccom
June 252002
Mr Dave Fuerst OampM Inc 540 Hopmeadow Street Simsbury CT 06070
RE Data Package Review Report - CompuChemSDGs D1458 and E1458- Total and Dissolved Arsenic and Lead and Total Iron in Water
Dear Dave
I have completed my evaluation of the inorganics analysis data prepared by CompuChem Environmental for one ground water (GW) sample from the LampRR Site which was reported in two data packages under Sample Delivery Groups (SDGs) D1458 and E1458 The packages were received by Trillium for review on May 13 2002 Total and dissolved metals analysis results for sample MW104A042302 were reported
Analyses wereperformed accordingto EPASW-846 (Third Edition)-Update IIIMethodsfor total and dissolved arsenic totaland dissolved lead and total iron all elements were analyzed using trace inductively coupled plasma (ICP) instrumentation(EPA 6010B) My evaluation was based on thespecifications ofthe project-specificQuality Assurance Project Plan(QAPP 996)the referenced methods and the USEPA Region I Laboratory Data Validation Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganics Analyses (688 Rev 289) Qualifiers consistent with those defined in the Region I document were applied as necessary and appropriate
Although the QAPP specifiesthat Level HIdata packagesare required for all analysesexcept the 5-yearsampling events fullraw datadeliverables (ieICP instrument print-outs) were provided for all of the metals analyses These raw data were not reviewed by Trillium as part of this evaluation As specified in Section 92 of the QAPP (page 23) a Level III evaluation limited to an overview of the information provided on the summary forms was performed
Based ontheevaluation theresult for totallead in MW104A042302wasqualified aslessthan the reported value (12 U) based on associated calibration blank contamination The B qualifier applied by the laboratory to this result was removed by the evaluator
HOME OFFICE 28 GRACES DRIVE bull COATESVILLE PA19320 bull (610)383-7233 bull FAX (610) 383-7907
OFFICES IN LOUISIANA bull MARYLAND bull NEW JERSEY bull NORTH CAR0UNA bull PENNSYLVANIA bull TENNESSEE bull TEXAS
^frRILLIUMKc
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of CompuChem SDGs HD1458 and HE1458 (Total and Dissolved Metals in Water) June 252002 Page 2 of 5
This qualifier is reflected on the affected Organic Analysis Data Sheet (Form I) included as Attachment A to this report Region I qualifier definitions are also provided in this attachment
It should be noted that the instrument detection limits (IDLs) for these analyses do not meet the 10 pgL detectionlimit required forarsenic andlead in associationwith thisproject Thereported IDL for arsenic is 20 pgL and the reported IDL for lead is 11 pgL
No laboratory duplicate matrix spikematrix spike duplicate orserial dilution analyseswere reported in association with either of these data packages SW-846 requires that matrix spiked duplicate samplesbe analyzed at afrequency of one per matrix batch(Method 601OB Section 84) Serial dilutionanalysesare notspecifically requiredwith eachbatch but are recommendedwhenever a new or unusual sample matrix isencountered (Method 6010B Section 85)Project-specific QC was not indicated on the COC for this sampling event and the narrative in each data package states that sample matrix quality control was not requested on this SDG No action wastaken by the evaluator on this basis
Details regarding the review and evaluation of these data are discussed below
HoldingTimes PreservationandSampleIntegrityA copy ofthe applicable field chain ofcustody (COC) record was included in both data packages The site sample was collected on 42402 Total and dissolved metals analyses were performed on 5302 well within the required 6-month holding time
An acceptable (4degC plusmn 2degC) cooler temperature (5degC) on laboratory receipt was recorded on the COC Thesampler indicated thata filtered sample andan unfiltered samplewere provided for analysis and documented acidification of the samples for metals analyses with nitric acid on the COC Verification of successful acidification (pHlt2) was recorded by the laboratory on the laboratory receiving log and (for the total metals sample) on the laboratory preparation log
The sample for total metals analysis was digested on 43002 in preparation for analysis Consistent with thespecifications ofSW-846 the filtered and acidified sample for dissolved metalsanalysis was not digested prior to analysis
Calibrations Based on the Analytical Run Logs (Form XIV) in both data packages initial and continuing calibration verification (ICVCCV) standards were run at the appropriate frequencies throughout the analysis series during which MW104A042302 was run for all total and dissolved constituents AllICVCCV recoveriesdocumented on theaccompanying FormsIIA were acceptable (QC 90-110)
^^^TRILLIUMmc
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of CompuChem SDGs D1458 and E1458 (Total and Dissolved Metals in Water) June 252002 Page 3 of 5
Results for a contract required detection limit (CRDL) standard containing arsenic at 10 ngL and lead at 3 ngL werereported onForm IIBin eachdata packageiron (at 100 pgL) was also reported in SDG D1458 (totalmetals) Recoveries forall threetarget analytes (977-105) wereacceptable (QC 80-120)
Blanks Initialand continuingcalibration blanks(ICBCCBs) wererunat theappropriate frequencies throughout the sample analysis series Arsenic was not reported above the applicable IDL or below the negativeIDL inany ofthe CCBsassociated withthe reportedsample analysesPositive responses for iron were reported infive of the15 calibration blanksrun duringthe series(CCB1 CCB3 CCB9 CCB10 and CCB11) and lead was detected at a low concentration (12 pgL) in the series-ending calibration blank (CCB15) MW104A042302 was analyzed between CCB14 and CCB15 Iron was not detected above theinstrument detectionlimit in eitherof theseblanks thereforethe sampleresult for iron was not affected by the reported CCB contaminatioa The result for total lead in MW104A042302 was qualified as less than the reported value (12 U) based on the associated calibration blank contaminatioa
Two water matrix preparation blanks (PBWs) were analyzed with the site sample (Form XIII) one each with the total and dissolved fractions No target elements were reported above the applicable IDLs (or below the negative IDLs) in either of these blanks
InterferenceCheck Sample Recoveries reported on Form IV in each data package for all target elements in the interference check sample analyses performed at the start of the analysis series were acceptable (QC 80-120)
LaboratoryControlSamples Acceptable recoveries (QC80-120) for total arsenic ironand lead (102-104) were reported on the Laboratory ControlSample (LCS) Report (Form VII) in the data package for SDG D1458 Acceptable recoveries for dissolved arsenic and lead (967 and 936) were reported on the LCS Report in the data package for SDG E1458
DuplicateAnalysisNo laboratory duplicate analysis was performed on MW104A042302
MatrixSpikeAnalysisNo matrix spike analysis was performed on MW104A042302
ICPSerialDilutionNo serial dilution analysis was performed on MW104A042302 SampleResults Results greater than or equal to the laboratory-specified IDLs were appropriately reported on the Inorganic Analysis Data Sheets (Form I) for the individual sample analytes
Positive sample results greater than the applicable IDLs but below the CRDLs were correctly reported by the laboratory with B qualifiers As concentrations approach theIDL the accuracy of the measurement decreases values closer to the CRDL however are probably quite accurate
^TRILLIUM
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of CompuChem SDGs D1458 and E1458 (Total and Dissolved Metals in Water) June 252002 Page 4 of 5
Therefore a guideline of 2xIDL was used to determine whether the reported results warranted qualification specifically sample results below the respective CRDL less than 2xIDL and not otherwise qualified warrant qualification as estimated (J) No sample results in either of these data packages warranted qualification on this basis all B qualifiers applied by the laboratory were removed by the validator
IDLs established on 41502 on instrument P4 were documented on Form X in both data packages All non-detected blankand sample results were reported to theappropriate IDLsAll sampleanalyses were documented on the run log (Form XTV) included in each data package
It should be noted that the IDLs for these analyses do not meet the 10 pgL detection limit required for arsenic and lead in association with thisproject The reported DDL for arsenic is 20 pgL and the reported IDL for lead is 11 pgL
FieldDuplicates No field duplicate sample was submitted with this data set
TotalversusDissolvedConcentrationsComparisonoftotal versusdissolved resultsfor arsenicand lead in MW104A042302 revealed the following
Total Dissolved HgL PgL D
Arsenic 965 978 13
Since the D is less than 10 this discrepancy can be attributed to experimental error Therefore no action was necessary on this basis
DocumentationDatapackage documentationwas inconsistent withthe specificationsof the QAPP specifically a Level IV package was provided when a Level III package was required Pursuant to the validationspecifications for this project the additional documentation (ie the raw data)was not reviewed by Trillium as part of this evaluation
A COC record provided in the data package included the reported sample and was properly completed except that themethod ofshipment was not clearlyrecorded by the sampler andlaboratory receipt was not fully documented FedEx was recorded in the first Received by space but CompuChem was recorded in the associated Company Name space Presumably the date and time also recorded here reflect the time of arrival at the laboratory since no other signature information is included Although it is a good idea to include FedEx in the signature trail on the COC it must be reflected as both a Received by and a subsequent Relinquished by notation to
^fmiLLIUKU
Mr Dave Fuerst Evaluation of CompuChem SDGs D1458 and E1458 (Total and Dissolved Metals in Water) June 252002 Page 5 of 5
be complete and accurate The laboratory receipt signature should follow as the final Received by signature
Results from analysis ofthe dissolved metalssample fraction were distinguished from analysis results for the total metals fraction only by reporting thesamples in separateSDGs and data packages The word Dissolved was added by the evahiator to the dissolved metals analysis resultsform (Form I) attached to this report to clarify the distinction similarly the word Total was added to the total metals analysis results form
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this report
Sincerely
CgJl Carol A Erikson Quality Assessment Manager
CAEekd April 2002Metalscc (95406)
^TRILLIUM
ATTACHMENT A
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEETS CompuChem SDGs D1458 and E1458
EPA Region IQualifierDefinitions
U - Tbe material was analyzed for bat was not detected above the level of the associated value The associated value iseither thesample quantitation limit or the sample detection limit
J - The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity
R - The data are unusable (Note Analyte may or may not be present)
UJ - The material was analyzed for butwas notdetected The associated value is an estimate and may be inaccurate or imprecise
SW846 METALS -1shy
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO
Lab Name COMPUCHEM Contract
MW104A042302 TOTAL
jab Code LIBRTY Case No SAS No SD6 No D1458
Matrix (soilwater) WATER Lab Sample ID D1458-1
poundevel (lowmad) LOW Date Received 42502
Solids 00
Concentration Units (ugL or mgJcg dry weight) UGL
CAS No Analyte Concentration M
7440-38-2 Arsenic 965
7439-89-6 Iron 61400 L_l 7439-92-1 Lead 12 IU I P I
MUMer-
Color Before COLORLESS Clarity Before CLEAR Texture
Color After COLORLESS Clarity After CLEAR Artifacts
Comments
Form I - IN SW846
AirRecorf rECEved Division of LFR
June 282002 J0L 03 2002
Mr Dan Garrigan Operations and Maintenance Inc 450 Mont Brook Lane KnoxvilleTN 37919
RE LampRR Landfill North Smithfield RI AirRECON Project 030-12266-00-000
Dear Mr Garrigan
Please find a copy of the laboratory results from the test program performed at the LampRR landfill an June 5-62002 located in Smithfield RI and associated data from the test program
Five TO-14 samples were collected around die perimeter of die landfill at previously determined locations The sampling duration was approximately 22 hours The shortened sampling duration was due to potentially low pressures remaining in the TO-14 canisters insuring samples would not go ambient In addition we wanted to make sure enough pressure was left in die canisters to ship and ultimately collect sample
One Method 18 integrated bag sample was collected over a four hour period at die header of die flare and then analyzed off site from the list of parameters provided from previous years All sampling was performed without incident and followed USEPA methodologies
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at (860 721-7728)
It was a pleasure being of service to you once again and look forward to assisting you again in die near future
ClnnoioK
John S Gammie Sr Environmental Specialist AirRECON a division of LFR
Cc File
5 Johnson Drive PO Box 130 Raritan New Jersey 08869-0130 bull Tel (908) 526-1000 bull Fax (908)526-7886
Air Quality Services Nationwide
SW846 METALS -1shy
INORGAN1C ANALYSES DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO
MW104A042302
ab Name COMPUCHEM Contract
ab Code LIBRTY Case No SAS No SOG No E1458 rgtshy
itrix (soilwater) WATER Lab Sample ID E1458-1
avel (lowmed) LOW Date Received 42502
Solids 00
Concentration Units (ugL or mgkg dry weight) UGL
Analyte Concentration MCAS No
7440-38-2 Arsenic 978
7439-92-1 Lead 11 |U| I P
Color Before COLORLESS Clarity Before CLEAR Texture
Color After COLORLESS Clarity After CLEAR Artifacts
Comments DISSOLVED
S SW846Form I - IN
Sampling Data on June 5-62002 at the Smithfield Rl Landfill TO-14 Samples
Weather conditions June 52002 Barometric Pressure 3003 Relative Humidity 59 South Southwest wind 15-25 mph temp 60
Location Start time Date Finish time Date
1-near gate 1002am 6502 0802ampn 6602
near gate duplicate 1002am 0502 0802am 6602
2- 1008am 6502 0808am 6602
3- 1012am 6502 0812am 6602
4-near flare 1016am 6502 0816am 6602
Method 18 Sampling Data
Start time 0832am End time 1232pm Date 6502
O 81 MInc Environmental Operations and
Maintenance Management
Appendix D
AirRECON Ambient Air and Flare Header Sampling Results
FROM SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL (TUE) 6 18 2002 1 7 00 ST 16 59 ND 561 0232493 P
LFR 87 Church Street East Hartford CT 06108
Attn John Gammie
Client Project Number
LaboratoryID
AD19499 AD19S00 AD19501 AD19502 AD19503 AD19504
SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL INC
ftfliwnf HANBAL TECHNOLOGY
Maattchutetti Cenifkation laquo MMAI38 Rhode Iamdl98 Maine MAIJ8
Florida pound8780087562 New Hwnpatwe 2538 Coaneeticut PH-0777
New York 11393 Monday June 172002
Repm Status Final Report
bull Re-issued Report O Revised Report
03012266 Location See Chain of Custody
ClientSampleID Anaiyga Requested
Tank 1 EPA Method TO-14 Tank I Duplicate EPA Method TO-14 Tank 2 EPA Method TO-14 Tank 3 EPA Method TO-14 Tank 4 EPA Method T014 Blank EPA Method TO14
18ttest that all information contained withmthit report has been reviewed for accuracy and checked against all quality control requirements outlined in each applicable method and meet the requirements of NELAC including any data obtained from a subcontract laboratory Please note that all solid matrix sample resultaare calculated on a dry weight basis unless otherwise specified
This report may not be reproduced except in foil without written approval from Spectrum Analytical Inc
Emmmimuszs II Mragiw Drive bull Agawtm MisadnseOsOlOQl bull 1-800-789-9115 bull 413-789-9018 bull Fax 413-789-4076
2 FROM SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL (TUE) 6 1 8 2002 1 7 00 ST 16 59 NO 5510232493 P
SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL INC Laboratory Report
Location See Chain of Custody Client Project No 03012266 Client LFR Submittal Date 662002 Lab ID No AD19499 Collection Date 662002 Client Id Tank 1 Matrix Air
Parameter Results Units PQL Start Date Analyst Method
Air Analysts EPA Mtthcd TO-14 Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12) 066 PPBv 03 682002 cw EPATO-14 Chtoromethaiie 068 PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 12-Dtchlorotetraftuorotlbaac Below det liro PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Vinyl chloride Below det tim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Bromomethane Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Chloroethute Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Trichlorofluuiuiuclhane (Freon 11) Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 11-DicUoroethene Below det 11m PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Methylene chloride Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 112-Trichlorotrifhioroethane Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 11-DtcUofocthane Below det tiro PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 cia-12-Dichloroethene Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Chloroform Belowdettim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 12-Dkhloroethaxte Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 111-Trichloroethane Below det lim PPBv 03 682002 Cw EPATO-14 Benzene Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Caiboo tetrachloride Below det tiro PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 12-Dichloropropane Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Tnchloroethene Below det lira PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 cis-l -Dkhloropfopene Below det tim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 tnns-13-Dichlarapnipetie Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 112-Trichloroethane Below det hrn PPBv 0S 682002 cw EPATO-14 Toluene Below det tim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 l Dibroroocthaiic Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 TetrachloroetbeDe Below det tim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Chlorobenzene Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Etbylbenzenc Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 mp-Xyleite Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Stytene Belowdettim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 112^-TetTichtoroethane Belowdettim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 o-Xylene Belowdettim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 135-Trimethylbeuzetie Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 Cw EPATO-14 4-EtbyltoIueiie Belowdettim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TQ-L4 124-Trimcthyibcnzenc Belowdettim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 U-Dichlorebenzeae Belowdettim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14
Pag1of12
FROM SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL (TUE) 6 18 2002 1 7 Q1ST 16 59 N0 5510232493 P
LabIDNo AD1499 Collection Date 662002 ClientId Tank1 Matrix Air
Parameter Remits Halts FQL Start Date Analyst Method Benzyl chloride Below dethm PPBv 05 682002 CW EPA TO-14 14DieUmbettoe Bebwdettim PPBv 0S 682002 CW EPA TO-14 IJ-Dichlotobenzefie Below de( Km PPBv 05 682002 CW EPA TO-14 124-Trichlorobeiizene Below dotKm PPBv 05 682002 CW EPA TO-14 HexftchJorobutftdiese Below det Km PPBv 05 682002 CW EPA TO-14 4-Bromofhiorobeiizene (SR) 94 PPBv 682002 CW EPA TO-14
PmgtiqfH
FROM SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL (TUE) 6 18 2002 1 7 01 ST 16 59 N05510232493 P
Lab ID No AD19500 Collection Date 662002 Client Id Tank 1 Duplicate Matrix Air
Parameter Remits Units PQL Start Date Analyst Method
Air Analysis EPA Mtikod TO-14 DicUofodiflttofomethaac (Freon 12) 10 PPBv 05 682002 CW EPA TO-14
CUaoMilutt 075 PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATQ-K
12-Dtchlorotetrafluoroethane Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 CW EPA TO-14 Vinyl chloride Below detlim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Bromomethone Below detttm PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Chtoroefhane Below det Hm PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14
Trichloroflpwontethanc (Freon 11) Below detlim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14
11-Dichlotoethene Bcbw detlim PPBv 05 682002 Cw EPA TO-14
Methylene chloride Below detlim PPBv 05 682002 cw BFATO-14 112-Trichlorotrifluoroethanc Below det Hm PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 11-Dichtosodhane Below detlim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14
cis-l2-Dich]oroethene Below detlim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Chlotofonn Below detlim PPBv Q5 682002 cw EPA TO-14 12-Diehimoethane Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 111-Tricfctorocthane Below detlim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14
Benzene Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14
Cnboa tetrachloride Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw BPA TO-14 12-Dichloropfopang Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Trichloroethcnc Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 cis-13-Dichlofopropenc Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-U
tnnamp-l3-Dichloropropene Below detlim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 112-Trichlorocthane Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Toluene 060 PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 U-Ditoomeethaae Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Tetrachloroethene Below det lim PPBv OJ 682002 cw EPA TO-14 CWorobenzene Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Eihythenzene Below det Hm PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 mp-Xylene Below det hm PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Styreae Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14
1122-Tetnchloroethanc Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 o-Xylene Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 135-Triracthytbenzcrtc Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 4-Ethyhokeoe Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 124-Trimethylbenzene Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 13-Dichlerobenzene Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Benzyl chloride Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw BPA TO-14
14-Dkblorobefizefie Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 12-DfoUorobettene Below det bm PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14
124-Trichlorobenzene Below det Urn PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Hexachlorobutadiene Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14
Paftiofi2
FROM SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL (TUE) 6 18 2002 1 7 01 ST 16 59 N05510232493 P
Lab ID No AD19500 Client Id Tank 1Duplicate
Collectta Date 662002 Matrix Air
Parameter 4-BroTTwftuorobenzene (SR)
Remits 97
Units PPBv
PQL Start Date 682002
Analyst CW
Method EPA TO-14
FROM SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL (TUE) 6 18 2002 17 01 ST 16 59 NQ 551 0232493 P
Lab ID No AD19S01 Collection Date 662002 Client Id Tank 2 Matrix Air
Parameter
Air Analysis EPA Method TO-14 DkMoiodilhoroaethaiic (Ficon 12) Chloromethane 12laquoDicMnrntelrafliiATMiiu^Mraquo
Vinyl chloride Oromomethane Chlotoethane Trichtorofluwomethaae (Freoo 11) 11-Dichloroetheae Methylene chloride 112-Trichlorotrifluoiocthane lM)ichlQfoethane cis-12-Dichloroethcne Chloroform 12-Dkh)oroethane 111-Trfehloroethane Benzene Caiboo tetrachloride 12-Dichloropropane Trichloroethene cis-1^-Didttonqnopeae trans-13-DichtoropTopene 112-Trichloroethane Toluene 12-Dibromoethine Tetmchloroetfcene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene mp-Xylette Styrene 1122-TetnchlofOcthaae O-Xylene
135-Trimetbyibenzene 4-Ethyltoluene 124-Trinaethylbenzcnc 1^3-Dkhlorobenzene Benzyl chloride 14-Dichlorobenzene 12-DicMorobeaeene 124-TrichIorobenzene HcxscUorobvtadiene
Results Units FQL Start Date Analyst Method
073 PPBv OS 682002 cw EPATQ-L4 072 PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det tan PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-L4 Below det tan PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below del Ha PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det tan PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det Um PPBv OS 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det Km PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det Km PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det tan PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det tan PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det tan PPBv as 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det tan PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det tan PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det tan PPBv 05 682002 CW EPA TO-14 Below det tan PPBv OS 682002 CW EPA TO-14 Below det Um PPBv OS 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det tan PPBv OS 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv OS 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv OS 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det tan PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det tan PPBv OS 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det tan PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det tan PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-H Below det lim PPBv 05 6B2002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det tan PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det Um PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below dec tan PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det tan PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det tan PPBv OS 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv OS 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det tan PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 0S 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det tan PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det Um PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14
PageSof12
FROM SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL (TUE) 6 18 2002 1 7 02 ST 16 59 NO 5510232493 P
Lab Dgt No AD19501 Collection Date 662002 Client Id Tank 2 Matrix Air
Parameter Results Volts PQL Start Date Analyst Method 4-BroffioiluorobenzeBe (SR) 96 PPBv 682002 CW BPATO-14
Page6of12
8 FROM SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL (TUE) 6 18 2002 1 7 02 ST 16 59 N0 5510232493 P
Lab ID No AD19502 Collection Date 662002 Client Id Tank 3 Matrix Air
Parameter Remits Units PQL Start Date Analyst Method
Air Analysis EPA Method TO-14 DicUorodiflBammetfcaae (Freon 12) 11 PPBv 06 682002 CW EPATQ-L4
076 PPBv 06 682002 CW CPA TO-14 12-DichJocotetrafiuofoelhaiw Belowdetlim PPBv 06 682002 CW EPATO-L4 Vinyl chloride Below detlim PPBv 06 682002 CW EPA TO-14 Brnnonedaiie Below det tra PPBv 06 682002 CW EPA TO-14 Chloroethane Below det lim PPBv 06 682002 CW CPA TO-14 TrichlwofluomiiwilMiwi (Freon 11) Below detlim PPBv 06 682002 CW EPA TO-14 11-Dichlorocthcne Below det lim PPBv 06 682002 CW EPA TO-14 Methylene chloride Below detlim PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 112-Trichlofotilfluoroethaoe Below det Km PPBv 0-6 682002 CW EPA TO-14 11-Dtchkmctbne Below det lim PPBv 06 682002 CW EPA TO-14 cis-12-Dichloroethepg Below detlim PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Chloroform Below detliax PPBv 06 682002 CW EPA TO-14 12-Dichloroethane Below det lim PPBv 06 682002 CW EPA TO-14 111-Trichknoethane Belowdet lim PPBv 06 682002 cw CPA TO-14 Benzene Below det Km PPBv 06 682002 CW EPA TO-14 Carbon tetrachloride Below detlim PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 12-Dkhloropropaite Below det lim PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Trichloroethcnc Betadet Km PPBv 06 682002 CW EPA TO-14 cis-l -Dkhloropropcnc Below det lim PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 brans-13-Dichloropropcne Below detlim PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 112-Trichloroothniie Below det lim PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Toluene 066 PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 1^-Dibromoethace Below det lim PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Tctracfalorocthane Below detlim PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Chlorobenzene Below det lim PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Ethylbeazene Below det lim PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 OAp-Xylene Below det lim PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Styrene Below det Km PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 1122-Tetrachloroethane Below det lim PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 o-Xylene Below det Km PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 l tS-Trimeihylbcnzene Below det lim PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 4-EthyltolueBe Below det lim PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 1t24-Tniiieib)flbciizctt Below det lim PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 ODkhlorobenzeoe Belowdet Km PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Benzyl chloride Below det Km PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 14-DichIorobenzene Below det Km PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 12-DtcMorobenzene Below det Km PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 124-Tnchlotobenzene Below det lim PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14 HexacWorobutadjene Below det Km PPBv 06 682002 cw EPA TO-14
Pa$7ofi2
FROM SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL (TUE) 6 1 8 2002 1 7 02 ST 16 59 NO 551 0232493 P
Lab ID No AD19502 Client Id Tank 3
Collection Date 662002 Matrix Air
Parameter 4-Bromofluorobeozeoe (SR)
Results 95
Units PPBv
FQL 0
Start Date 682002
Analyst CW
Method EPATO-14
rag8af12
FROM SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL (TUE) 6 18 2002 17 02 ST 16 59 NQ 5510232493 P 10
Lab ID No AD19503 Collection Date- 662002 CUcat Id Tank 4 Matrix Air
Parameter
Air Analysis EPA Method TO-J4 DichloTodiflgorometfcane (Freon 12) ChJoromethane 1^bullDtchlorotetraflttorocthanc Vinyl chloride Bromomettane Chloroe thane TrichloreftuoromethaBC (Freon 11) 11-DicUoroetbene Methylene chloride
112-Trichlofotrifhioroeihaiie 11-Dlchjoroethane cie-lJ-Pichloroclhcoc Chloroform 12-Dichlwocthane lM-Trichloroethane Benzene Carbon tetrachloride 12-Dichloropropane Trichloroethene cis-13Dichloioptiqraquoic trans-13PicMwopropcne 112-Trichloroethme Toluene 12-Dibranoediaae Tctrachloroethene CUorobenzene Ethylbetmene mp-Xylene Stymie
1122-Tetmchloioethane O-Xylene U5-Trirnctbylbenzcne 4-Ethyltolwne 124-TrimeihyIbcnzcne 13-Dichlorobenzene Benzyl chloride 14-Dichlorobenzene 12-Dkhlorobefizese 1raquo24-Trichlorobesze8e Hexachlorobutadiene
Results Units PQL Start Date Analyst Method
063 PPBv 08 682002 CW EPA TO-14 0B2 PPampv 08 682002 CW EPAT044 Below det lhn PPBv 08 682002 CW EPA TO-14 Below det liugt PPBv 08 682002 CW EPA TO-14 Below det Urn PPBv 08 682002 CW EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 08 682002 CW EPA TO-14 Below det Km PPBv OA 682002 CW EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 08 682002 CW EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 08 682002 CW EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 08 682002 CW EPA TO-14 Belowdet Um PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 08 682002 CW EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below detlim PPBv Q8 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lint PPBv 08 682002 cw EPATO-L4 Below det Km PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det Km PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 080 PPBv 08shy 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det Km PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Mow det Km PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below detKm PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det Km PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det Km PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below dellim PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 08 682002 CW EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 08 682QQ2 cw EPA TO-14 Below det Km PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det Km PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14 Below det lim PPBv 08 682002 cw EPA TO-14
Pg9tfI2
FROM SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL (TUE) 6 18 2002 1 7 03 ST 16 59N0 5510232493 P 11
Lab ID No AD19503 Collection Date 662002 Client Id Tank 4 Matrix Air
Parameter Results Units PQL Start Date Analyst Method 4-Bromoflaorobcnzcac (SR) 96 PPBv 0 682002 CW BPATO-14
Fag tQ of 12
FROM SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL (TUE) 6 1 8 2002 17 03 ST 16 59 NO 551 0232493 P 12
Lab ID No AD19504 Collection Date 662002 Client Id Blank Matrix Air
Parameter
Air Analysis EPA Method TO-14 Pichlwodiflttoromcthane (Ficon 12) Qibromethanc 12-DichIorotettafluorocthane Vinyl chloride Biomomethaoe Chloroethane Trichlorofluoromcthinc (Freon 11) 11-Oichloxoethene Methylene chloride
11^Thchlorotrifluoroedume 11-Dichlorocthane ctvl 2-Dichloroethcnc Chloroform 12-Dichloroethane 11raquo1-Trichloroethane Benzene Carbon tetrachloride 12-Dichloropropane Trichloroethenc cia-13-Dtchkgtropropene trans-13-Dichloropropeiie 112-TrichIoroethaae Toluene 12-Dibtomoethane Temchloroeiheampe Odoiobenzene Ethytbenzcoe mp-Xylene Styrene 1122-Tetnchforoethaae o-Xylene 135-Trimethylbenzene 4-Ethyhahiene 124-TrimelhyIbcczcne
U-Dichlocobeozene Benzyl chloride 14-PrehJorobenzeac
12-Dichlofobeazene 124-Trichlorobenzenc Hexaddordbutadienc
Results Units PQL Start Date Analyst Method
Below det lim PFBv OS 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below detHm PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-M Below det lion PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det Una PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det lint PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det hm PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det lin PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det lin PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det lira PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below detHm PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det lim PPBv OS 682002 cw EPA TO-I4 Below det lira PPBv OS 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below detHm PPBv 05 682002 Cw EPATO-14 Below detHm PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below detHm PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det Km PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det Um PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det lim PPBv OS 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below detHm PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det Um PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det Um PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det Um PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below detHm PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below detHm PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below det lim PPBv 05 682002 cw EPATO-14 Below detHm PPBv 05 682002 cw EPA TO-14
Pag11of12
FROM SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL (TUE) 6 18 2002 17 03 ST 16 59 NQ 5510232493 P 13
Lab ID No AD19504 Collection Date 662002 Client Id Blank Matrix Air
Parameter Results Units PQL Start Date Analyst Method 4-Bromofluorobeozene (SR) 94 PPBv 682002 CW EPA TO-14
Reviewed by Validated by
pound 6112002 ServiceQuality Assurance Depts boratory Director
fag12 ol2
FROM SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL (TUE) 6 18 2002 1 7 03 ST 16 59 N05510232493 P
SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL INC Featuring
HANIBAL TECHNOLOGY
Laboratory Report Supplement
SW 846 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Third edition 1998 40CFR 136 Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act 40CFR141 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations 40CFR143 National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations 40CFR 160 Federal Insecticide Fungicide and Rodemicide Act (FIFRA) Good Laboratory Practice Standards APHA-AWWA-WPCF Standard Methods for foe Examination of Water and Wastewater 19 edition 1995 ASTM D 3328 Standard Methods for the Comparison of Watecbomc Petroleum Oils by Gas Chromatography EPA 540G-87003 Data Quality Objectives for Remediation Response Activities Development Process EPA 6004-79-012 Quality Assurance Handbook for Analytical Quality Control in Water and Wastewater Laboratories EPA 600479-019 Handbook for Analytical Quality Control in Water and Wastewater Laboratories EPA 6004-79-020 Method for theChemical Analysis of Water and Wastes EPA 6004-82-037 Methods for Organic Chemical Analysis of Municipal and Industrial Wastewater EPA 6004 85056 Choosing Cost-Effective QAQC Programs for Chemical Analysis EPA 6004-88039 Method for foe Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water CTETPH Analysis oCExtractableTotal PetroleumHydrocarbons (ETPH) MADEP EPH Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH) MADEP VPH Method for the Determinationof Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (VPH) QAMS 00480 Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Program Plans USEPA Office of
MonitoringSystemandQuahty Assurance OC-D-52-77 Oil Spill Identification System
Acronyms A Abbreviations
AA Atomic Absorption MS Matrix Spike ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate BOD C
Biological Oxygen Demand degree(s) Celsius
NTU PAHs
Nephelometric Turbidity Units Poly-nuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
COD Chemical Oxygen Demand PCBs Polychlorinated Biphenyts bull CMR Code of Massachusetts Regulations PID Photo Ionization Detector DEP Department of Environmental Protection PQL Practical Quantitation Limit Dl De-ionized R Recovery (R Percent Recovery) DO Dissolved Oxygen RSD Relative Standard Deviation EPA Environmental Protection Agency SM Standard Method EPH FID
Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Flame Ionization Detector
SR SW
Surrogate-Recovery (SR) Solid Waste
OC Gas Chromatograph THM Trihalomcthanc(s) GC MS Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer TOC Total Organic Carbon ICP Id
Inductively Coupled Plasma Identification
TOX TPH
TotalOrganic Halogen Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
MCL Maximum Contaminant Level VOC Volatile-Organic Compound MDL Minimum Detection Limit VPH Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons
PSg9t9f2
exsCb i I DUE DATE 1
Page I of J tZZIMMMEM
Chain of Custody Record Emergency Rush lt 5 Bus PayAirReconreg 5 Johnson Drive PO Box 130
Raritan NJ 08869 lt908) 526-1000 FAX (908) 526-7886
Container Type B Gas Bag 0 Petri Oish
AirRecon Job
CityState
jraquon030~Z2bbOdegOCO E Method 25 Tank F Method 25 Trap G Glafis N NIOSHTube
Project Manager amp(AvwuC ext P Plastic Bottle S Summa Canister
P o Number T VOST Tube V VOt Vial
Samples Submitted to AirRecon Lab Other
X XAO-2 Trip O Other
Sample Identification Sitter Sample Type
_ _SiZe Date Tefch
TQI^K i fa L
fa I (ifirtdi mi GZTK Je
ilk plusmnL iik
ssn Ik
A 55SJ ampL
Rush lt 10 Business Deys
Normal lt 15 Business Days
Sample Type Requested Analysis Method 1 Liquid
2 Gas 3 Fitter 4 Charcoal 5 Resm 6 Other
Lab ID
99bullfe I raquobull
0 III ESto issd
3 12535
TPxftX la
Special Instructions
Received Date 6ajqc Report Packageumdash Utr-6 CCompliance Non-complianee Received By NJDEP Method
0gtS NormalJpoundL Relinquished 6y Otfr Received By bale
FROM SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL (WED) 6 19 2002 1 33 ST 17 12 N05510232539 P
SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL INC
HANfflAl TECHNOLOGY
Munctaustttt Certification laquo M-MA138 Rhode hind 91 MifeeMAl3S
Florida 88760087362 New Hanpshife 2338 Cowxetictii PH-0777
LFR NtwYoikO 11393 Wednesday June 192002 87 Church Street
StatusHast Hartford CT 06108 w Final Report
bull Re-issued Report bull Revised Report
Client Project Number 03012266 Location See Chain of Custody
Laboratory ID Client Sample IP ASSIWWRMH^
AD19333 M18-1 EPA METHOD TO-15
1 attest that til information contained within this report has been reviewed for accuracy and checked all quality control mquiieincms outlined in each applicable method and mcfrt the requirementoof NTJAC Mw-hwting from a subcontract laboratory pieoee note that all solid matrix sample results are calculated oa a dry weight basis unless otherwise specified
This report may not be reproduced except in full widnut written approval from Spectnun Analytical Inc
wmmmALANALm Panleft
11 Abngren Drive bullAgawmMassachusau01001 1789-9115413-789-9018 bull Ear4LV789-4076
FROM SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL (WED) 6 19 2002 1 7 34 ST 17 12 NO 5510232539 P
SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL INC Laboratory Report
Location See Chain of Custody Client Project No 03012266 Client LFR Submittal Date 652002 Lab ID No AD19333 Collection Date 652002 Client Id Ml8-1 Matrix Air
Parameter
Air Analysis EPA METHOD TO-15 ttopeae Drchlorodifhroromethane Chloromethone Freoo-114 Vinyl Chloride 1^-Butadiene Bromomethane Chlorocthanc Acetone Trichlorofluofomethane Ethanol 11-Dichloroethene Methylene Chloride Freoa-113
Carbon Disulfide trane-12-Dichloroethene M-DieUorccthane MTBE bopropyl Alcohol Methyl Ethyl Ketone cis-12-Dichloroethene Hexane Ethyl Acetate Chloroform Tetrabydrofuraa 1raquo2-Dichlorocthane 111-Trichloroethane Benzene Carbon Tetrachloride Cyclohexaae
1^-Dibromopropane Bromodichloroizieihane Trichloroethane Heptane 4-Methyl-2-Pemaoone (MIBK)
Results
2650 270 Below det tiro Below det lim 1050 Below det lim Below det lim Below det tint 4540
Below det lim 19200 Below det lim 425 DCIOw laquoCt HOT
Below det lim Below det lim 275 Below det lim
3660 4000 625
Below ltfet lim 635 Below det lim 940 Below det lim Below det lim 360 Below det lim 690
Belowdet lim Below det lim 210
555 Below det lim
Units
PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv
PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv rrDV
PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv
PQL Start Date Time Analyst Method
100 662002 1017 CW TO-15 100 662002 1017 CW TO-15 100 662002 1017 CW TO-15 100 662002 1017 CW TO-15 100 662002 1017 CW TO-15 100 662002 1017 CW TO-15 100 662002 1017 CW TO-15 gt00 662002 1017 cw TO-15 100 662002 1017 CW TO-15 100 662002 1017 CW TO-15 100 662002 1017 CW TO-15 100 662002 1017 CW TO-15 100 662002 1017 CW TO-15 100 662002 1017 cw TO-15 100 662002 1017 CW TO-15 100 662002 1017 cw TO-15 100 662002 1017 CW TO-15 100 662002 1017 CW TO-15 100 662002 1017 CW TO-15 100 662002 1017 CW TO-15 100 662002 1017 CW TO-15 100 662002 1017 CW TO-15 100 662002 1017 CW TO-15 too 662002 1017 cw TO-15 too 662O02 1017 cw TO-15 100 662002 1017 CW TO-15 100 662002 1017 cw TO-15 100 662002 1017 cw TO-15 100 662002 1017 cw TO-15 100 662002 1017 cw TO-15 too 662002 1017 cw TO-15 100 662002 1017 cw TO-15 100 662002 1017 cw TO-15 too 662002 017 cw TO-15 too 662002 1017 cw TO-15
htgttof2
FROM SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL (WED) 6 19 2002 1 7 34 ST 17 12 NO 551 0232539 P
Lab ID No AD19333 Collection Date 652002 Client Id M18-1 Matrix Air
Parameter cis-13-Dkhloropropeampe trans-13-Dichloropropcac 112-Trichloroechaae Toluene 2-Hexanone Dibromochloromethane 12-Dibroinoethane
Tctracbloroetheiie Chlorobenzene Ethylbeaeene mp-Xylenes Bromoform Styrene o-Xylene 1122-tctrachloffoethane 135-Tnmetfaylbenzeee 4-Ethyhohicnc 124-Triraethylbeiizette 13DkhIorobrazene Benzyl Chloride 14-Dichlorobenzene 12-DkhJorobeozene 124-Triehlorobenzene HcxacMorohmadkne Naphthalene 4-BromoOuorohenzene (S)
Results Below det Km Below del lint Below del lim 22900 Below det lim Below det lira Below det lim 240 Below det hm 3000
5800 Below det lim 380 3000
Below det lim Below det lira 136
150 Below det lim Below det Km Below det Km Below det lim
Below det lim Below det lim Below det lim 117
Units PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv PPBv
PQL 100 100 100 200 100 100 100
100 100 100 100 100
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 too
wo 100
100
too
480
Start Date 662002
662002
662002
662002
662002
662002
662002
662002
662002
662002 662002
662002
662002
662002 662002 662002
662002
662002 662002
662002
662002
662002 662002
662002
662002
662002
Time 10
10 10
Analyst cw cw cw cw
cw
cw cw
cw
cw cw
Cw cw
CW cw CW cw cw
cw cw
cw Cw
cw Cw
cw
cw
cw
Method TO-15 Tais
TO-15
TO-1S
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15 TO-15 TO-15 TO-15 TO-15
TO-15
TO-15 TO-15 TO-15
TO-15
TO-15 TO-15 TO-15
TO-15 TO-15 TO-15
Pa$e2eft
FROM SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL (WED) 6 1 9 2002 17 34 ST 17 12 NO 5510232539 P
Results for Method Tn-15
Quality Control Sample True value 10 PPBv
Analyte
Propene Dlchlorodifluoromethane (freon 12) Chloromethane 12-Oichlorotetrafiuoroethane (freon 114) Vinyl Chloride 13 - Butadiene Bromomethane Chloroethane Aceione Trichlorofluoromethane (freon 11) Ethanol 11-Dtehloroetttene Methylene Chloride 112-Trichlorotriftuoroethane (freon 143 Carbon Disulfide trans-l2-Dichloroethene 11-Dichloroethane MTBE Isopropyl Alcohol 2-Butanone (MEK) cis-12-Dichlofoethene Hexane EthylAcetate Chloroform Tetrahydroforan 12-Dfchloroethane 111-Trichloroethane Benzene Carbon Tetrachloride Cydohexane 12-Dibromopropane Bromodichtoromethane
sample Results PPBv
115 107 107 110 105 106 103 98 125 108 122 105 104 108 117 113 104 106 112 111 105 108 111 103 111 103 103 104 104 104 106 105
Date Analyzed 6602 Analyst CJW
Recovery
115 107 107 110 105 106 103 98
125 108 122 105 104 108 117 113 104 106 112 m 105 108 111 103 111 103 103 104 104 104 106 105
Trichloroethene 107 107
FROM SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL (WED) 6 19 2002 T7 35 ST 17 12 NO 5510232539 P
Results for Method To-15
Quality Control Sample TrueValue 10 PPBv
Analyto
Heptane 4-Methyl-2-pentaftone(MIBK) ds-13-Dicbloropropene trans-13-Dichloropropene 112-Trichloroethane Toluene 2-Hexanone Dlbromochloromethane 12-Dlbromoethane Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene Ethyfbenzene MP Xylenes Bromoform Styrene O-Xylene 1122-Tetrachloroethane 135-Trlmethylbenzene 4-Ethyitolijene 124-Trimetbylbenzene 13-Dichlorobenzene Benzyl Chloride 14-Dichloroberuene 12-Dichlorobenzene 124-T richlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene
Method TO-15 (Modified) Analyzed by GCMS
Sample Results PPBv
103 109 104 104 107 106 104 103 106
106 109 105 226 102 107 107 114 94 93 100 103 115 115 106 85 97
Recovery
103 109 104 104 107 106 104 103 106 106 109 105 113 102 107 107 114 94 93 100 103 115 115 108 65 97
Date Analyzed 6602 Analyst CJW
bullbull TV
6 FROM SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL (WED) 6 1 9 2002 1 7 35 ST 17 12 NO 5510232539 P
SPECTRUM ANALYTICAL INC Featuring
HANIBAL TECHNOLOGY
Laboratory Report Supplement References
SW 846 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Third edition 1998 40CFR136 Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act 40CFR141 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations 40CFR 143 National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations 40CFR160 Federal Insecticide Fungicide and Rodcnricide Act (FIFRA) Good Laboratory Practice Standards APHA-AWWA-WPCF Standard Methods for toe Examination of Water and Wastewater 19 editiun 1995 ASTM D 3328 Standard Methods for the Comparison of Waterbome Petroleum Oils by Gas Chromatography EPA 5400-87003 Data Quality Objectives for Remediation Response Activities Development Process EPA 6004-79-012 Quahty Assurance Handbook for Analytical Quality Control in Water and Wastewater Laboratories EPA 6004-79-019 Handbook for Analytical Quahty Control in Water and Wastewater Laboratories EPA 6004-79-020 Method for the Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes EPA 6004-82-057 Methods for Organic Chemical Analysis of Municipal and Industrial Wastewater EPA 6004 85056 Choosing Cost-Effective QAQC Programs for Chemical Analysis EPA 6004-88039 Method for toe Detenranation of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water CTETPH Analysis of Extractable Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (ETPH) MADEP EPH Method for toe Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH) MADEPVPH Method for the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons- (VPH) QAMS 00480 Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Program Plans USEPA Office of
Monitoring Systemand Quality Assurance GC-D-52-77 Oil Spill Identification System
Acronyms A Abbreviations
AA Atomic Absorption MS Matrix SpikeASTM American Society for Testing and Materials MSD Matrix Spike DuplicateBOD Biological Oxygen Demand MTU Nephelometric Turbidity UnitsX degree(s) Celsius PAHs Polynuclear Aromatic HydrocarbonsCOD Chemical Oxygen Demand PCtts Polychforinated BiphenylsCMR Code of Massachusetts Regulations piD Photo Ionization DetectorDEP Department of Environmental Protection PQL Practical Quantitation LimitD1 De-ionized pound Recovery (R Percent Recovery)DO Dissolved Oxygen Relative Standard DeviationEPA Environmental Protection Agency SM Standard MethodEPH Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons SR Surrogate Recovery (SR)FID Flame Ionization Detector SW Solid WasteGC Gas Chromatograph THM Trihalomethane(s)GCMS Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer TOC Total Organic CarbonICP Inductively Coupled Plasma TOX Total Organic HalogenId Identification TPH Total Petroleum HydrocarbonsMCL Maximum Contaminant Level VOC Volatile Organic CompoundMDL Minimum Detection Limit VPH Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons
POf Iqf 2
AirReconreg Chain of Custody Record
Page 1 of 1 I DUE DATE 1
mamu
5 Johnson Drive PO Box 130 Rarilan NJ 08869 lt908) 526-1000 FAX (908)526-7886
ArrReconJob -1-O30-V^2io(copy-O0
CitySlate
Project Manager