Upload
brook
View
17
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Possible Micromechanical Model For Microtwinning. Possible Micromechanical Model For Microtwinning. Energy of the 2-layer pseudotwin (~600 mJ/m 2 ?). Energy of the 2-layer true twin (15 mJ/m 2 ?). Possible Micromechanical Model For Microtwinning. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1/6<112>pairs Matrix (L12)
GBSource
Twin
Orthorhombic
Reordering
12
Ni
Al
Cubic (L12)
Possible Micromechanical Model For Microtwinning
Possible Micromechanical Model For Microtwinning
Energy of the 2-layer pseudotwin (~600 mJ/m2 ?)
Energy of the 2-layer true twin(15 mJ/m2 ?)
Possible Micromechanical Model For Microtwinning
Energy of the 2-layer pseudotwin (~600 mJ/mol?)
Energy of the 2-layer true twin(15 mJ/mol?)
ttttpt tKt ).exp()()(
Possible Micromechanical Model For Microtwinning
At steady state doing a work balance for a forward progress of b, we get:
bdtK
bdtbdlb
ttttpt
2
22
).exp()(
)()(
d2
l =Applied Stressb = Burgers Vector(t) = Fault Energypt =Pseudo Twin Energytt = True Twin EnergyK = Parameter determining the reordering
kinetics (K=Dord/x2, where x is a measure of the short range diffusion length)
t = timeTertiaties sheared athermally creating pseudotwins
Secondaries sheared athermally creating faults that eventually reorder into true twins
Unsheared ’
A pair of identical Shockleys on adjacent slip planes
Possible Micromechanical Model For Microtwinning
Velocity for diffusion-mediated glide:
Assumptions:• the energy penalty due to the twin
decreases exponentially with time• the shear of secondary ’ is thermally
assisted while the shear of tertiary ’ is athermal.
• the effective stress driving the shear of the secondary ’ is given by:
Strain rate:
Microstructure Parameters:
Obtain from direct TEM measurements
Key Model Parameters:
Obtain from transient creep experiments
or modeling
tptptptwin vb
).(
)(ln
2
2
2tttpeff
ttpttpordtp fb
f
x
bDv
tp
pttertiary
frictiontertiaryeff
b
f
3
Possible Micromechanical Model For Microtwinning
Applied Stress = 420 MPaTemperature = 950Kpt = 300 mJ/m2
tt = 20 mJ/m2
Dord/x2 = 0.18/sFriction Stress = 25 MPa
Applied Stress = 420 MPaTemperature = 950Kpt = 300 mJ/m2
tt = 20 mJ/m2
Dord/x2 = 0.18/sFriction Stress = 25 MPa
Effective stress dependence on tertiary volume fraction (for a given applied stress)
Velocity dependence on tertiary volume
fraction (for a given applied stress)
Possible Micromechanical Model For Microtwinning
Temperature = 950Kpt = 300 mJ/m2
tt = 20 mJ/m2
Dord/x2 = 0.18/sf2 = 0.3Friction Stress = 25 MPa
Dislocation velocity vs Effective Stress. Stress exponent of velocity for low stresses is very close to unity. When the
stress is large enough to athermally shear the secondaries, then there is “power-law” breakdown.
Possible Micromechanical Model For Microtwinning
If tertiary volume fraction is assumed to drop exponentially with time, then the transient creep behavior can be predicted