Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Ports & Marine Diesel Emissions Reduction Activity:National Collaboratives & Northeast Case Studies
STAPPA & ALAPCO Spring MeetingMay 24, 2005Madison, WI
Michael BlockNESCAUM
2
Presentation Overview
• EPA FACA “Clean Ports USA” WG (*)• West Coast Collaborative (*)• NE Collaborative• Massport• PANYNJ• Staten Island Ferry• NY Private Ferries• Observations
(*) “National Clean Diesel Campaign”
3
FACA – Voluntary Program History
EPA wanted stakeholder input to build upon their voluntary programs on nationwide scale – “depth & breath”Want….
Further on-highway penetration (school buses, trucks, et al)
Expansion into new sectors – construction, rail, ag, portsAssess & ensure feasibly of technologies – application specificImplement “enhanced grant program”
Need….Mechanism for awarenessExpert inputStakeholder support
Work Under FACA Purview….
4
FACA Stakeholder Process
FACA
CAAAC
MSTRS
CSBUSA, Retrofit & Replacement WG
Stakeholder Input
Established by Congress (’72) to engender public participation
and expert advice
’90, advises EPA on
Clean Air Act
Scientific & tech arm of CAAAC
5
FACA – CSBUSA, Retrofit & Replacement WG
Conceived under EPA auspices, Dec. 2003
2 year program – final report to EPA, December, 2005
Sub-working groups by sector
Ports: Trish Koman (EPA) & Michael Block (NESCAUM)
Construction,
Freight (Trucks, Rail, Airports),
School Bus
AG recently added
6
FACA – CSBUSA, Retrofit & Replacement WG
Year 1 (2004)4 WGs formationDevelop work planDC Conference, June ’04Retrofit WG follow-up meeting, October ‘04
Year 2 (2005)EPA’s “Retrofit Experience Evaluation Project”Implement sector-specific plansFollow-up sector-specific workshopsFollow-up WG Meetings Final report, Dec ’05, to MSTRS
7
FACA – CSBUSA, Retrofit & Replacement WG
June 3rd & 4th, 2004 Conference, DC: www.cleanfleetsusa.net300+ attendeesMuch industry and government presence; less fleets…Additional grant funding announced (school buses)Plenary “overview session”, day 1, then 4 concurrent WG “breakouts”, final “reporting back in 2nd plenaryPorts Sector Breakouts – presentations from ports and ports-related stakeholders -- Lubrizol/Engine Control Systems (ECS), Port of Houston, MARAD, PANYNJ, USACE, POLBConference effective in identifying issues, all sectors
8
FACA – CSBUSA, Retrofit & Replacement WG
“Clean Ports USA” WS – Corpus Christi, TX, Jan, ‘05Goals:
Input – incentives to reduce emissions at portsCannot do effectively w/o stakeholder inputWS provided initial, “1st step” forum for that input
Ports Primer – Basic Facts, Technology, Case StudiesBroad stakeholder representationPresentations & Breakouts – Operating Ports, Landlord, Term OpsLaunched dialogue
BALANCE environmental stewardship effective business plan
9
FACA – CSBUSA, Retrofit & Replacement WG
• March ’05 Meeting –• Maintaining dialogue, planning report to EPA, Engage
NAWE (Charlotte Mtg)
• June ’05 Meeting – report writing
• September ’05 – Draft Report
• End of CY ’05 – Final Report
• FACA sunsets, April ’06
• Two reports: ICF Incentives, “Experience Evaluation” (R’Fit Database)
West Coast Collaborative – Marine Vessels and Ports
11
West Coast Collaborative – Marine Vessels and Ports
• Focus on west coast diesel emissions – US and CDN
• Goal: reduce diesel emissions in the most impacted communities• Supporting and bringing attention to the many
highly successful existing efforts• Creating a forum for information sharing along
major transportation corridors in the West• Leveraging significant new resources• Developing and implementing projects
12
West Coast Collaborative – Marine Vessels and Ports
• Marine WG began in April 2004 in Seattle:• Connected marine ports and air agencies to begin
educating one another• Expanded w/Collaborative meeting in San Francisco,
subsequent teleconferences • One of 5 Sector Work Groups (Ag, Trucking, Rail,
Construction)• Approximately 50 regular participants (ports):
• Leading industry associations • Cutting edge technology producers• Committed NGO’s
13
West Coast Collaborative – Marine Vessels and Ports
3 focus areas:
1. Emission Inventories
2. Sulfur Emission Control Area (SECA)
3. Information Sharing and Project Development
14
West Coast Collaborative – Marine Vessels and Ports
Latest Developments/Next Steps:
• Newsletter
• Continuing sector-specific meetings, CCs
• Promoting projects
• Leveraging funding
• Exchange & interaction w/FACA (ports)
15
Northeast Diesel Collaborative
• Northeast region – history of clean diesel innovation for in-use fleet
• Salem, MA powerplant
• “Central Artery Bridge & Tunnel (“Big Dig”)
• Template for EPA Verification Program,
March 1999 NESCAUM report
www.epa.gov/otaq/retrofit/documents/epafinalrep.pdf
16
Northeast Diesel CollaborativeGoals of the Collaborative• Develop linkages among existing programs• Expand the scope of existing programs• Encourage partners to collaborate on new
initiatives• Serve as a technical clearinghouse and
resource• Explore leveraging opportunities among
funders• Communicate the successes of the program to
the larger community
17
Northeast Diesel Collaborative
Sector-Based Approach • Trucks• Transit buses• School buses• Construction equipment• Locomotive • Marine
18
Northeast Diesel CollaborativeActivities and Strategies • Retrofits• Repowering• Retirement / scrappage• Rebuild• Refuel (Clean fuels & additives)• Inspection & maintenance• Anti-idling measures• Monitoring & assessment• Outreach & communication
19
Northeast Diesel CollaborativeYear One Activities (starting now)• Recruit partners• Brand, publicize & market Collaborative• Develop master catalogue in clean diesel initiatives in
the region• Create web-based maps of projects• Serve as incubator for clean diesel innovation• Serve as operational interface to link partners with
technical and financial resources• Develop linkages to EPA OTAQ and other
Collaboratives• Bring greater focus to clean diesel needs &
opportunities through all of the above
20
Northeast Diesel CollaborativeManagement and Structure• Housed at NESCAUM• Directed by NESCAUM, EPA I & EPA II• Est. Small Steering Committee – provide
strategic guidance• Est. Larger Advisory Group – bring
broader interests into the initiative
21
NE Case Studies
• Massport
• PANYNJ
• Staten Island Ferry
• NY Private Ferries
22
Massport – EPA Sensitive Populations
• “Sensitive Populations” susceptible to effects of PM• $82,800; April 2006• 2 major components – yard equip; drayage trucks• Yard – DOC + ULSD
• 13 pieces of equipment: RTGCs, stackers, mast lifts• Cummins & Caterpillar diesel powered
• Trucks – DOCs• R’fit 20 drayage trucks, Connelly Terminal• RFP to trucking companies, April 2005 (80+!)• Anticipated completion, October 2005
• Follows upon existing programs – DOCs, LSD, Idling, Tier 2
23
PANYNJ – Green Practices• Green Practices Task Force
• Initiating dialogue with & between tenants• Voluntary initiatives to promote a cleaner port –
recycling, less idling, use of lower sulfur fuels• Crane electrification• On dock rail – in place in NJ, Staten Island on deck• PIDN (Port Inland Distribution Network) ($6M)
• PANYNJ “feeder port”• Replace goods transport via truck by barge, rail
(cheaper, less emissions)• In operation for Albany (barge)
24
PANYNJ – APM Terminals
Criteria For Emissions Strategy• Meets Business Needs
• Supported By Current Infrastructure
• Program With National Application
• Sustainable Long Term
• Integrates With Prevailing & Future Standards
• Must Be Safe
25
PANYNJ – APM Terminals – LSD/ULSD
1993
2006
Fuel Sulfur5,000 ppm
Fuel Sulfur 500 ppm
Fuel Sulfur 15 ppm
26
PANYNJ – APM Terminals
APM Emissions Reduction Strategy
• Replace, not retrofit
• Nonroad Tier 2 for repower
• On-highway for replacement
27
PANYNJ – APM Terminals
Effect Of Fleet Renewal/Modernization –the business case
• More efficient power• Safer equipment• Reduced emissions• Reduced maintenance• Less downtime• Enhanced warranty (on-highway)• Enabler of additional technology
28
Ferries – Retrofit Challenges
• Technical –
• EGT (wet v dry)
• Diesel fuel sulfur
• Space
• Safety
29
Staten Island Ferry – SCR Demo Proj
Impetus for Demonstration Project • CAA General Conformity for 50’ Harbor
Deepening• NOx emissions offset from harbor deepening
dredging• Harbor Air Management Plan (HAMP)• Ferry NOx mitigation one of six “Tiers” of
proposed mitigation strategies
30
Staten Island Ferry – SCR Demo Proj
31
Staten Island Ferry – SCR Demo Proj
• Owned and operated by NYCDOT. • Alice Austen
• Retrofitted with Argillon LLC SINOx® SCR• Hardware/install costs of ~ $700,000• Urea costs of ~ $1.30/gallon • No SCR for gen sets – repower• Installation completed, last fall (’04)• Undergoing acceptance testing• WVU in-use emissions testing (PEMS)
• John Noble (sister ship)• Plan to install, fall ’05• Probably same vendor; same technology
Staten Island Ferry – SCR Demo Proj
6NO + 4NH3 = 5N2 + 6H2O4NO + 4NH3 + O2 = 4N2 + 6H2O
6NO2 + 8NH3 = 7N2 + 12H2O2NO2 + 4NH3 + O2 = 3N2 + 6H2ONO + NO2 + 2NH3 = 2N2 + 3H2O
Source: DieselNet
CO(NH2)2 = 2 ·NH2 + COCO(NH2)2 + H2O =2NH3 + CO2
Reduction Equations
Urea Hydrolyzation
80-95%
33
Staten Island Ferry – SCR Demo ProjIssues• Urea
• Infrastructure/supply• Price well above anticipated
• Urea Tank Installation• Ammonia odor issues• Ventilation issues
• USCC• Required installation of catwalks, handrails, etc• Required deadweight survey to account for addition of
weight of SCR system since system was >2% of light ship load
• Significant vessel downtime
34
Staten Island Ferry – SCR Demo ProjNext – to 2007• Move to larger class vessels –
•Kennedy (reaching retirement)•Molanari•Barbieri•Fleet averages seven vessels
• EMD 2-cycle locomotive diesels – different challenges over 4-cycle Cat’s• Emissions signature – high soot content• Oil sulfur content – in exhaust gases• Exhaust temps lower
• RFP solicitation ~06/05 seeking:- SCR Proposals
- Repowering with low emission engines- Turbocharger swaps or other mechanical changes- Other?
35
NYSERDA Private Ferries
• Pilot project – NOx and PM emission reductions• Impetus – NYC very large ferry fleet after 9/11 – 3 operators, ≈ 45
vessels• Historically high emitters• Goal – pilot feasibility, 1 vessel; subsequent grants, other funding
for full fleet• Project team – Seaworthy Systems, NESCAUM, ESI, Environment
Canada• Fleets –
• NY Waterways, NY Water Taxi, Sea Streak• Varying vessels, engines, types, sizes, routes
• Schedule• Proposal, May 2003• 1st PAG Meeting, January 2004• Pilot retrofit, fall, 2005
36
NYSERDA Private FerriesProject Components
• Vessel Characterization – Fleet ID• In-use vessel data acquisition• ULSD drop in• In-use vessel emissions testing & evaluation• Engine dynamometer emission confirmatory testing• ECT matrix development• RFP• ECT downselect• ECT deployment• In-use vessel emissions testing & evaluation• Full-fleet planning• Final Report
37
NYSERDA Private Ferries
Sea Streak Water Taxi
38
NYSERDA Private FerriesECT Candidates
• Wide array of RFP respondents• May select combinations to maximize NOx & PM reductions• FBC, DOC, ADPF, PDPF, SCR, LNC, emulsions…..
Project Challenges• Private fleet schedule/business plan• Space• Safety• Operating parameters – emissions signature, exhaust gas
temperatures
39
NYSERDA Private Ferries
40
NYSERDA Private Ferries
41
NYSERDA Private Ferries
42
Ferries – Exhaust Types
43
Observations
Yes, we can do this!
• Regulatory/Mandatory
• Contracts-based
• Voluntary