Portland Community College€¦ · Consultants to Higher Education 1515 Fifteenth Street, NW Ste 613 Washington, DC 20011 202.882.8700 202.726.2251 fax C:\Users\hier\Dropbox (Biddison

$Page 1: Portland Community College€¦ · Consultants to Higher Education 1515 Fifteenth Street, NW Ste 613 Washington, DC 20011 202.882.8700 202.726.2251 fax C:\Users\hier\Dropbox (Biddison$
Portland Community College

Facilities Plan - Phase 1

Monthly Report

January 31, 2017

Portland Community College Monthly Report-02

Facilities Plan – Phase 1 January 31, 2017

1

Summary The sections in this monthly report outline the status for each work group up through the current

month. This addresses the key activities, areas of focus, outstanding questions or information requests,

next steps and schedule progress. A work group summary may be followed directly with a team

consultant report update.

Overall Project Outstanding Items:

1. Team Access to the Google Drives will be critical for distributing project information and for

team communications. This is in progress by PCC and is close to completing.

2. Sample reports were requested by the task force. The planning team is assembling samples from

each consultant for reference and review by PCC.

Contents Space Utilization Work Group ....................................................................................................................... 2

Facilities Condition Work Group ................................................................................................................... 3

Capital Projects Work Group ........................................................................................................................ 5

Safety and Security ....................................................................................................................................... 6

Transportation and Parking Work Group ..................................................................................................... 7

Information Technology Work Group ........................................................................................................... 8

ADA Work Group........................................................................................................................................... 9

Sustainability Work Group .......................................................................................................................... 10

Updated Overall Project Schedule (attached) ............................................................................................ 11

Updated Schedule for site visits (attached) ................................................................................................ 12



2

Space Utilization Work Group

1.31.17:

Summary of activities: See attached updated summary from Tom Hier of Biddison Hier.

Key Focus for month: See attached summary from Tom Hier of Biddison Hier.

Outstanding Items: See attached summary from Tom Hier of Biddison Hier.

Next Steps: See attached summary from Tom Hier of Biddison Hier.

Schedule: See attached summary from Tom Hier of Biddison Hier.

Chair Members Consultant Team

Kurt Simonds

Dean of Instruction

Cascade Campus

Laura Massey

Tonya Booker

Tricia Brand

Ken Dodge

Karen Sanders

Tatyana Batazhan

Nita Posada (SRG)

Robert Lochner (SRG)

Tom Hier (Biddison Hier)

BIDDISON HIER, LTD. Consultants to Higher Education 1515 Fifteenth Street, NW Ste 613 Washington, DC 20011 202.882.8700 202.726.2251 fax www.biddhier.com

C:\Users\hier\Dropbox (Biddison Hier)\Public\Portland Comm Coll Master Plan\08Project Notes\2017 01 10 Kurt Simonds Memo.docx As of 2 Feb 2017 3:08:13 PM

10 January 2017

Memorandum

To: Kurt Simonds

From: Tom Hier

RE: Follow-Up and Meetings with Deans

As per our conversation before the holiday, we would like to arrange meetings with Deans and Division

Deans, as appropriate, for the next level of review of classroom and course scheduling data that we have

been provided.

To that end, this memo sets out the primary questions we have regarding the data so that individuals at PCC

can review the questions, and the datasets, in preparation for in-person meetings where we can discuss the

data together and, we hope, resolve outstanding questions. The questions and areas of focus are described

below.

Q u e s t i o n s

1 Different Instructional Methods

There are four different instructional methods listed among the courses:

� CLASSROOM (87% of Fall 2015 courses)

� CLWEB (3%)

� TVWEB (0.01% -- 1 entry)

� WEB (10%)

For PCC: Should all of these instructional methods be included in our utilization analyses, or are there any

that should be excluded?

2 Meeting Day Patterns

Most courses have identify some combination of meeting days (e.g., MWF, TR, etc.). However, almost

30% of Fall 2015 courses show “No Phys Meetings” as the Meeting Day Pattern.

2

For PCC: How should courses that have no physical meetings be treated for our analyses – e.g., excluded

from utilization analyses by campus physical location? Excluded or included in other utilization analyses

that might be undertaken?

3 Definitions of “Campus”

As you will recall, our course data includes two different ways in which the course venue is designated, as

follows:

� by “Campus Physical Location of Building”: this is the campus on which the course is actually physically

held.

� by “Campus (or Area) of Record”: we understand this to mean the organizational entity with which the

course is associated, regardless of the physical location where the course is held.

More specifically, regularly-scheduled instructional activities are held at a variety of locations across the

city – some directly at the campuses, some at major centers, and others at satellite locations. Regardless of

physical location, all courses are also generally associated with one of the following campuses or areas

(called “Campus (or Area) of Record” for simplicity):

� Cascade

� Rock Creek

� Sylvania

� Southeast

� Workforce & Community Education

� Educational Services.

A chart in the 29 November presentation, reproduced below as Chart 1, shows the relationship between

Campus Physical Locations where courses are held and the Campus or Area of Record.

Chart 1. Crosswalk between Campus Physical Locations and Campus of Record

3

For PCC: To proceed with utilization analyses, we have the following questions:

A. Can we simplify the number of physical locations and determine which – if any – to exclude from

analyses?

In the chart above, there are 25 distinct categories of physical location, some with very few courses

identified. The table below offers an initial attempt at collapsing these 25 categories into 14 categories.

Detailed lists of courses included in each category are provided in an attached Excel spreadsheet. (Each

aggregated physical location is a separate tab in the Excel file.)

Please review the aggregation proposed in Chart 2 below and confirm or suggest updates, as required.

Further, it seems obvious that the first 11 major categories would be included in analyses. There is a

question about how to handle categories 12 (Distance Learning), 13 (Off-Campus) and 14 (Null or Other –

TBD). Please review courses in the Excel spreadsheet associated with these categories and advise as to

how they should be treated for space utilization analyses.

Chart 2. Physical Locations

Physical Locations

Physical Location Aggregated Physical Location

1 Cascade Cascade

Cascade (off campus)

2 Rock Creek Rock Creek

Rock Creek (off campus)

3 Southeast Southeast

Southeast (off campus)

4 Sylvania Sylvania

Sylvania (Distance Learning)

Sylvania (off campus)

5 CLIMB Climb Center

6 Downtown Center Downtown Center

7 Hillboro Center Hillsboro Center

8 Metro Center Metro Center (Portland Metropolitian Workforce Training Center)

9 Newberg Center Newberg Center

10 Swan Island Trades Center Swan Island Trades Center

11 Willow Creek Willow Creek Center

12 Distance Learning Distance Learning (Community Education)

Distance Learning (for Newberg Center)

Distance Learning (PCC District)

13 Off-Campus Off Campus

Off Campus (PCC District Wide)

14 Null or Other -- TBD Columbia Center

Null - location to be determined

Open Campus (PCC District Wide)

TBD

4

B. Beyond analyzing utilization by physical location, what other types of analyses would be helpful,

especially with respect to analyses by Campus (or Area) of Record?

Beyond analyzing space utilization by physical location, are there analyses that should be done by Campus

or Area of Record? For example, there are a substantial number of courses associated with the Workforce

and Community Education area, which are spread among various campuses and centers (e.g., CLIMB,

Southeast, Sylvania, Willow Creek). Please consider what types of analyses might be desirable and

informative, and advise how to proceed.

N e x t S t e p s The approach we have discussed for resolving the questions outlined here is as follows:

1 Individual data reviews by various deans.

You have suggested that various deans who are familiar with course offerings at the campuses and centers

should review the data in advance of meeting with us, so that they have an opportunity to contemplate the

questions posed in this memo (and to pull in others, as necessary, who may also be knowledgeable about

scheduling).

The attached Excel file lists all courses, broken out by the aggregated physical locations shown in Chart 2.

Please distribute course data for each aggregate location to the appropriate dean(s).

2 Schedule in-person meetings with relevant deans.

Once the deans have had a chance to consider and review the data, then we would like to schedule

individual meetings with each of them (or their representatives) to review the data. If possible, we would

like to arrange these meetings for the last week of January or the first week of February.

In the meantime, if you or others have any questions or need further explanation of anything in this memo,

please do not hesitate to get in touch with me. I can be reached via email at [email protected], or via

telephone at (202) 882-8700.

Thank you.

Attachment

Excel file include course lists by aggregated physical campus location

Cc: Rebecca Ocken

Bryan Higgins, SRG Partnership

Nita Posada, SRG Partnership



3

Facilities Condition Assessment Work Group

1.31.17:

Summary of activities: The Facilities Work Group has met every 2 weeks since 10/31/16.

Key Focus for month: PAE and SRG have started their site visits with SE campus. Other consultants to

follow include; Catena, WH Pacific, 2.ink

Outstanding Items: As Consultants start their site visits other documentation could be needed. Since

that is just starting and some have just completed their first reviews this is under development.

Site Visits:

1. PCC has provided key cards (1/31/17) for consultants that need to access to buildings during site

visits.

2. Typically, each campus will kick off the site visits with a coordination meeting with that

campuses facilities group to review questions from the consultant team. This took place for SE

campus on 1/23/17 with SRG and PAE. A kick off meeting is scheduled for the Rockcreek campus

on 2/6/17 for PAE, Catena and SRG.

3. The task force identified contractor parking is available at Rockcreek campus near the

construction trailer that can be used for consultants doing site visits. Contractor parking is also

available at the Sylvania campus near the play fields for the same use. Parking passes may be

available for consultant use for the SE and Cascade campus.

SRG:

SRG has just completed (2/1/17) site tours of the SE Campus reviewing each room in each building on

campus. The next monthly report will include information on findings for that review.

PAE:

PAE has completed review of the SE campus and are developing results from that visit. Attached is a

report from PAE updating on this month’s activities and an example of an information logging matrix

developed by PAE to record items noted in during their site tours.

Catena (structural):

Catena structural engineers will be starting their review next week at the SE campus. Their review will

not include buildings already reviewed in previous seismic reports. This includes a 2012 kpff report for

Sylvania campus that reviewed 7 buildings and a catena report for Rockcreek issued in 2012 that


Tony Ichsan

Director

Facilities Support Services

John MacLean

Joe Gamble

Donna Bezio

Mark Erickson

Zahava Jones

Heidi VanBrocklin

Gary Danielson (SRG)

Bryan Higgins (SRG)

Jason Karam (SRG)

Nedzib Biberic (PAE)

Jared Lewis (Catena)

Tom Jaleski (Code Unlimited)

Brady Berry (WH Pacific)

Alex Simpson (WH Pacific)

Melinda Graham (2.ink)



4

reviewed 2 buildings. Catena will review the balance of buildings in the PCC system and fold in the

existing information for a more compressive document.

Code Unlimited:

Code Unlimited Provide a list of applicable codes for accessibility for each of the buildings. Review

drawings of all the buildings in the inventory for accessibility compliance issues. Working with the ADA

group they have developed a list of buildings for their site visits.

2.ink:

Will be conducting meetings with the Staff and Student Leadership groups that would entail an initial

15-20 minute introduction to the type of information we are interested in discussing, a leave-behind

questionnaire for students/staff to then consider and then a follow-up discussion. There would be a

separate meeting per campus.

Will be meeting with Maintenance staff as related to each Campus and Center. A maintenance

questionnaire would be distributed ahead of these meetings and each meeting would discuss the

feedback from that and any other relevant information regarding maintenance.

Next Steps:

SRG will continue to coordinate consultant team site visits for each campus.

Schedule: The attached overall project schedule shows site visits occurring in the months of January,

February and March. Each team is currently in the process of visiting sites and scheduling upcoming site

visits.

Progress Report

pae-engineers.com | 1

DATE: February 2, 2017 PROJECT: PCC Campus-wide Master Plan PROJECT NO.: 16-1448 TO: Bryan Higgins FROM: Nedzib Biberic SUBJECT: January Progress Report - PAE

DISTRIBUTION: File

On January 16th the PAE team kicked off the Southeast campus site assessments with a meeting with PCC

facilities team and SRG. General campus rules were covered along with questions the PAE team had for

facilities. At the end of the meeting, the whole team conducted a site walk with facilities, who pointed out

current problem areas and equipment.

The mechanical team finished the site assessments on the Library, Commons, and Mt. Scott buildings. 50%

complete with the assessment on the Annex building. 95% complete with the assessment on Mt Tabor. Anticipate being completed with the site assessments by middle of next week. The plumbing tem has completed all site visits for the Southeast campus. Currently working on compiling of notes and images for assessment report. The electrical team has completed approximately 60% of the site assessments, with an additional visit for

testing of the normal and egress lightings scheduled for 2/12, as it requires testing to be completed during night time. The Rock Creek kickoff meeting has been scheduled with PCC and SRG for 2/6. Initial questions have been

forwarded to PCC and the team is currently compiling initial data for site visits.

[DISCIPLINE]CREATED DATE: 5 5 4 4 3 3 1

Finding

No.

Equipment

Tag/ID1

Location

Floor/Area System Description

Year of

Install

Area

Served2

Code

Deficiencies3

System Deficiency

Action that Mitigates

Deficiency Photo Cod

e V

iola

tion

Lif

e S

afe

ty

Cap

acit

y

Eq

uip

men

t

Con

dit

ion

Eq

uip

men

t

Lif

e

Exp

ecta

ncy

5

Main

ten

an

ce

En

erg

y

Eff

icie

ncy

Weig

hte

d

Tota

l

Su

gg

este

d

Prio

rit

y f

or

Mit

igati

on

Esti

mate

d

RO

M4

**Internal Notes**

M100 AHU-X

Roof, mechanical

room, etc

Central Equipment (AHU, DOAS,

etc)

Elec Data:

Airflow:

Cooling Capacity:

Heating Capacity:

Humidifier:

Control type:

CHWS/R Temp:

HWS/R Temp:

# of SA Fans:

SA Fan HP/each:

# of RA Fans:

RA Fan HP/each:

Pre/Final Filter Rating:

VFD:

Fuel Type:

Based on as

built schedule

L1

classrooms

Unit access:

Coil condition:

CHW/HW valve access:

UV lights:

Water carryover from coil:

Drain pan (corrosion, growth, etc):

Standing Water:

Filters present:

Filter condition (bypass?):

Pressure gauges:

Temperature gauges:

Fans operating:

Fans in balance:

Belt guard:

Access doors sealed:

Visible corrosion:

Duct connections:

Piping connections:

Dampers open when operating: 5 3 4 4 4 2 5 95 H

M200 FCU-X

Decentralized Equipment (FCU,

Split system, VRF)

Elec Data:

Indoor unit type:

Airflow:

Cooling Capacity:

Heating Capacity:

Control type:

CHWS/R Temp:

HWS/R Temp:

SA HP:

Filter:

FCU access:

Branch selector box access:

Outdoor unit access:

Outdoor unit airflow obstructions:

Control box elec clearance (30"):

Piping insulation:

Drain pan (corrosion, growth, etc):

Secondary drain pan (piped to visible location):

Filters present:

Filter condition (bypass?):

Fans operating:

Fans in balance:

Visible corrosion:

Duct connections:

Piping connections:

Unit vibration isolation: 0 3 5 4 4 5 5 83 M

M102 B-X

Boilers

Type:

Capacity:

Vent type:

Adequate access:

Flue condition:

Flue distance from OSA intake:

Combustion air:

Emergency stop: 0 L

M103 CH-X

Chillers

Elec Data:

Type:

Capacity:

Refrigerant:

CHW Flow:

CHWS/R temp:

CW Flow:

CWS/R temp:

Evap PD:

Cond PD:

# of compressors:

Vibration isolation:

Tube pull access:

Marine water box:

0 L

M104 CT-X

Cooling Towers

Elec Data:

Capacity:

Sump condition:

Excessive mist:

Distance from OSA intakes:

Blowdown/bleed:

0 L

M105 P-X

Pumps

Elec Data:

Type:

Flow:

Head:

HP:

VFD:

Adequate access:

Piping connections:

Vibration isolation:

Suction diffuser or strainer:

Pressure gauges: 0 L

M106 N/A

Generators (HVAC scope)

Heat rejection (unit mounted or

remote):

Fan assisted:

Acoustic treatment:

Muffler type:

Duct silencers:

Acoustic louvers:

Engine exhaust discharge location:

Insulation on engine exhaust:

OSA intake location:

Heat rejection location: 0 L

M107 EF-X

General Supply/Exhaust Fans

Elec Data:

Type:

Airflow:

TSP:

HP:

Belt or Direct:

VFD:

Gravity or motorized damper:

Distance to OSA intakes:

Birdscreen:

0 L

M108 EF-X

Lab Exhaust Fans

Elec Data:

Type:

Airflow:

TSP:

HP:

Belt or Direct:

VFD:

Redundancy:

Gravity or motorized damper:


Birdscreen:

Discharge nozzle height:

0 L

M109 EF-X

Kitchen Exhaust Fans

Elec Data:

Type:

Airflow:

TSP:

HP:

Belt or Direct:

VFD:

Drain type (piped or trap):


Duct connection to fan:

Vented curb/shaft:

UL 762 compliant: 0 L

M110 TU-X

Terminal Units (20%)

Elec Data:

Max airflow:

Min airflow:

Reheat coil type:

HWS/R temps:

Elec coil control type:

Sound attenuator:

Duct length at inlet (TU size):

Excessive inlet size duct (>3 duct diameters):

Distance to first branch duct:

HWS/R valves accessible:

Control box elec clearance (30"):

0 L

M111

Distribution Ductwork (20%)

Diffusers/grilles

FD/SD/FSD's open:

Flex duct on SA runouts:

Access doors closed:

Unintentional openings (uncapped ducts, etc):

Continuous insulation:

Audible leaks:

High PD fittings:

Diffusers/grilles clean:

Short circuiting: 0 L

M112 Grease Exhaust Ducts

Fire wrap:

Access doors:

Proper slope:

Cleanouts at elbows:

Material (SS vs galvanized):

0 L

M113 Distribution Piping (20%)

Isolation/shut off valves open:

Pipe shields at hangers:

Continuous insulation:

Visible leaks:

Expansion compensation: 0 LM114 5 3 5 4 1 1 2 84 M

Notes:

1. Equipment tags are aligned with labels in the field and/or BAS where possible. Most central equipment is consistently tagged. Most distributed equipment was not tagged in the field and has been assigned a tag based on AHU assignment and space served.

2. Service areas determined by as-built drawings and discussions with facilities staff where possible.

3. Deficiencies are based on current codes and do not necessarily reflect a deficiency at the time of construction.

4. ROM cost includes estimates for first cost of the equipment, demolition, controls and power, installation cost incured by mechanical contractor, soft cost, and contingency. Excludes cost due to infections controls, fire watch, permitting, and premium cost due to overtime or after hours work.

5. Life expectancies based on 2015 ASHRAE Applications Chapter 37 and the associated online database.

Facility Infrastructure Condition Assesment

Deficiency

Priority Multiplier (1 = low, 5 = high)

Category Score

Code Violation Priority Weight

Priority Score (1-5; 5 being high priority) 5 100%

0

5


1

2

3

4

5


1

3

5


1

2

3

4

5


1

2

3

4

5


2

3

4

5


1

2

3

4

5

Priority Level Max Poss Points 125 Low Limit High Limit

H 75% 100% 94 125

M 40% 74% 50 93

L 0% 39% 0 49

High

Medium

Low

Equipment Life Expectancy5

Maintenance

Complex Maintenance (Chillers, Boilers, AHUs)- Accessible

New

10+ Years Remaining

5-10 Years Remaining

0-5 Years Remaining

Past Typical Service Life

Complex Maintenance (Chillers, Boilers, AHUs)- Not Accessible

Energy Efficiency

Capacity

Life Safety

Equipment Condition

Serves Non-Critical Areas - Minor/Easily Correctible

Serves Non-Critical Areas - Major, or Serves Critical Areas and No Issues

Serves Critical Areas - Minor/Easily Correctible

Serves Critical Areas - Moderate

Serves Critical Areas - Major

Poor

Very Poor

Simple Maintenance - Accessible

Simple Maintenance - Not Accessible

Meets Current Code

Code Deficiencies

Excellent

Good

Fair

Extra Capacity Available

Meets Capacity

Does Not Meet Capacity

Level Percentage Range

Exceeds Current Code or N/A

Meets Current Code

Prior Code - Good

Prior Code - Fair

Prior Code - Poor



5

Capital Projects Work Group

12.23.16:

Summary of activities: The SRG Planning Team has received pricing for the Tier I and select Tier II bond

projects from RLB and have distributed, projects include:

Tier I

01 Health Professions / IPT Building – Combined with 04 IT Location

02 Metro Center

03 OMIC Columbia County Center – Awaiting on PCC to provide original estimate, this will be a

verification from an existing report. We will send as soon as we receive from PCC sometime next week.

04 IT Location – Combined with 01 Health Professions / IPT Building

05 Cascade Public Safety Building

06 Sylvania Site Improvements

07 Student Housing Feasibility Study – Removed from scope

08 Rock Creek Events Center Parking Lot- Verification from existing estimate

09 Sylvania Health Technologies Building – This was previously a verification item, the scope has been

slightly modified since previous estimate was completed

Tier II

01 Sylvania Makerspace – Removed from Scope

02 Rock Creek CTE Building

03 Rock Creek Makerspace – Removed from scope

04 Hillsboro Center

05 Downtown Center

Key Focus for month: A summary of this pricing and capital projects status was presented at the board

meeting on 1/19/17, attached is the presentation from that meeting that includes a summary of all

capital bond projects and budgets.

Outstanding Items: NA

Next Steps: The board is reviewing.

Schedule: The attached overall project schedule shows the capital projects process, the work group is on

track with the schedule.


Linda Degman

Director

Bond Program

Zahava Jones

Debra Jarcho

Rebecca Ocken

Gary Sutton

Tony Ichsan

Nita Posada (SRG)

Jason Karam (SRG)

Susan Gust (SRG)



6

Safety and Security Work Group

12.23.16:

Summary of activities: January 31,2017

Below is a summary from Layne Consultants on their site visit the week of January

Southeast Campus

Reviewed security subsystems:

• Video Surveillance and Recording (2 systems)

o Milestone IP video platform

o Legacy analog Integral Technologies DVR system

• Access Control System

• Intrusion Detection System

• Mass Notification System

• Incident Reporting System

• Public Safety Office Command/Control

Cascade Campus


• Video Surveillance and Recording (2 systems)

o Milestone IP video platform

o Legacy analog Dedicated Micros DVR system




• Public Safety Office Command/Control

• CommScope/Andrews RF Enhancer-Distributed Antenna System (DAS) Garage

Sylvania Campus


• Security Command Center Operations

• Telex Vega Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD)

o C-soft DPS software (IP Dispatch)

o 800 MhZ Radios

• Video Surveillance and Recording



Derrick Foxworth

Director

Public Safety

Debra Jarcho

Alan Bral

Mike Sturgill

Kevin Crowley

Tony Ichsan

Neal Naigus

Ryan Aiello


Bryan Higgins (SRG)

Rob Layne (Layne)

Mark Peterson (Layne)



7



January 19, 2017

Sylvania Campus

Public Safety operations interviews conducted with:

Sgt Alan Bral – Video Systems

Officer Danielle Parker – Access Control

Derrick Foxworth, Public Safety Director

January 20, 2017

SRG Partnership

Update to SRG project management

Overview

1. The electronic security systems are not consistently deployed across all PCC campuses.

2. Legacy analog video systems remain in place. Some of which are not available from security

control.

3. Currently, the Mass Notification System initiates canned messages from Sylvania. Cannot send

customized messages from another campus.

4. The Mass Notification System is being upgraded However the status/schedule of the upgrade,

and the specific functionality of the upgrade are not known.

5. PCC Public Safety staff lacks formal training on electronic security subsystems.

6. PCC Public Safety lacks documented policies and procedures for the configuration,

administration, and operation of electronic security subsystems. How systems are being used is

critical to establishing a technology roadmap as part of the Facilities Report.

7. PCC Public Safety has implemented electronic security subsystems without the benefit of a

documented strategy or plan; including staffing for configuration, administration, and operation

of systems.

8. M Sturgill to provide Layne with copies of previous RFPs for security systems for review.

Key Focus for month:

1. Layne will develop a strawman of facilities report

2. Inventory systems and version levels at each site

3. Develop a technology roadmap matrix to provide consistent deployment across PCC.


Next Steps:

1. Review schedule for next site visit.


February and March. Layne has already conducted one site visit, they are evaluating the information

gathered and will develop a schedule for the next site visit.



8

Transportation and Parking Work Group

12.23.16:

Summary of activities: The Transportation and Parking Work Group has met every 2 weeks since

10/31/16.

Key Focus for month: The team is working on documentation of existing conditions, strategies and

solutions. A document outline has been submitted for review by the workgroup.


Next Steps: The next work group meeting is scheduled for 2/28 and a work group chair meeting is

scheduled for 2/15.



visits.


Kathleen McMullen

Manager

Transportation and Parking

Karissa Nickerson

Wendy Palmer

Jennifer deLaix

Mark Gorman

Michael Kuehn

Narce Rodriguez

Dean Halley

Bryan Higgins (SRG)


Todd Mobley (Lancaster)

Miranda Wells (Lancaster)

Phil Worth (Kittelson)



9

Information Technology Work Group

12.23.16:

Summary of activities: Vantage Consultants has made some final revisions to their proposal including

information regarding the number rooms to be evaluated for AV.

Key Focus for month: Once Vantage has access to the existing information from Google Drive they can

start to review and provide comments on other outstanding information needed for review.

Outstanding Items:

Vantage: At least 2-3 weeks prior to the initial site visit vantage will need the following information:

1. IT specific info which was being provided by the stakeholders on the Google Drive

2. The rest of the items requested in our proposal’s Methodology section

Next Steps: Vantage has scheduled their first site visit for 2/21 and is in the process of developing an

agenda for that visit. They will send that draft agenda out for review next week.



visits.


Michael Northover,

Chief Information Officer

Information Technology

Val Moreno

Debra Jarcho

James Reece

Ed Hawkins

Payam Damghani

Andy Freed

Kevin Edwards

Charmagne Ehrenhaus

Hank Schottland

Bryan Higgins (SRG)

Bjorn Clouten (SRG)

Richard Bussell (Vantage)

Ken Godachy (Vantage)

Jon Young (Vantage)



10

ADA Work Group

12.23.16:

Summary of activities:

After meetings on 1/10/17 it was agreed that summary of the ADA scope is the following:

Transportation (Lancaster and Kittelson Engineering): Review existing reports and confirm existing ADA

parking and required ADA parking and locations at all campuses and centers.

Site (SRG & WH Pacific Engineering): Provide an ADA assessment of the existing path of travel from ADA

parking and transit stops to the main entry at each building at all campuses and centers.

Building (SRG & Code Unlimited): Provide a list of applicable codes for accessibility for each of the

buildings. Review drawings of all of the buildings in the inventory for accessibility compliance issues.

Code Unlimited has developed with PCC and SRG a list of buildings they will focus on in their site visit

review. SRG will be reviewing all buildings in the PCC system.

Key Focus for month: All Consultants are currently reviewing the existing materials sent that consists of

existing plans and specifications. All consultants are also in the process of scheduling site visits.

Outstanding Items: All Consultants are currently reviewing the existing materials sent that consists of

existing plans and specifications. After review we will develop a list of outstanding items.

Next Steps: SRG and consultant team will schedule site visits.



visits. The next work group meeting is scheduled for 2/21/17.


Alex Baldino (New Chair)

Jennifer Gossett (Previous Chair)

Accessibility Specialist

Disability Services

Wendy Palmer

Donna Bezio

Jody Giffen

Maria Mendez

Kathy McMullen

Jason Karam (SRG)


Brady Berry (WH Pacific)

Alex Simpson (WH Pacific)

Joshua Klyber (Code Unlimited)



11

Sustainability Work Group

12.23.16:

Summary of activities: The sustainability Work Group has met several times now and have developed a

scope of work vision as follows:

Version 3. We will develop a Sustainability Plan to include an assessment evaluating current college

systems and guidelines for college practices emphasizing sustainability in seven key areas:

● Energy & Emissions

● College Operations

● Construction & Renovation

● Grounds & Natural Systems

● Health & Well-being

● Education & Culture

● Resiliency (this item has been put on hold for now)

Key Focus for month:

Outstanding Items:

Next Steps: Next meeting is scheduled for 2/8.


February and March.


Briar Schoon

Manager

Sustainability

Laura Ward

Julie Mast

Alyson Lighthart

Elaine Cole

Jack Lussier

Lisa Peterson (SRG)

Bryan Higgins (SRG)

PORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE MASTER PLAN | SRG PARTNERSHIP

2016 2017

SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC

PORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE MASTER PLAN

PROJECT SCHEDULE � ��/��/��

B. WORK GROUPS

FACILITIES CONDITION ASSESSMENT

ARCHITECTURAL �SRG�

MEP �PAE�

STRUCTURE (Catena)

INFRASTRUCTURE (CIVIL-WH Pacifi c)

SITE (LANDSCAPE-2.ink)

TRAFFIC/TRANS (Lancaster/Ki! elson)

IT (Vantage)

SPACE UTILIZATION (Biddison Hier)

SUSTAINABILITY

ADA

SAFETY & SECURITY

A. CAPITAL BOND PROJECTS

TIER I

01-HEALTH PROFESSIONS (CLIMB)

02-METRO CENTER

03-COLUMBIA COUNTY (OMIC)

04-IT DEPARTMENT LOCATION

05-PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG (CASCADE)

06-SITE WORK (SYLVANIA)

07-STUDENT HOUSING STUDY

08-SITE WORK (ROCK CREEK)

09-HT BUILDING SYLVANIA

10-SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE

11-IT

12-SAFETY & SECURITY

MEETINGS

TASK FORCE (WEEKLY)

STEERING COMMITTEE (MONTHLY)

WORK GROUPS (WEEKLY)

PCC BOARD (MONTHLY)

COST ESTIMATES

BO

ND

RE

SO

LUT

ION

: "

/#/$

%

DR

AF

T R

EP

OR

T

BO

AR

D M

TG

: P

RIC

ING

RE

VIE

W:

$/$

%/$

%

INVESTIGATION SITE VISITS ASSESSMENT REFINEMENT

BO

ND

VO

TE

PROGRAM DESIGN PCC REVIEW

PCC PROVIDED INFORMATION




BO

ND

SU

BM

ISS

ION

BO

AR

D M

TG

: R

ES

OLU

TIO

N R

EV

IEW

: "

/$%

/$%

ESTIMATE' # WEEKS

DR

AF

T F

INA

L R

EP

OR

T

FIN

AL

RE

PO

RT

REVIEW REVIEW

DR

AF

T M

AT

ER

IAL

DU

E *

/$/$

%

DR

AF

T M

AT

ER

IAL

DU

E +

/$,

/$%

DR

AF

T M

AT

ER

IAL

DU

E $

"/$

/$%

C. MASTER PLANNING

e.priori® BRAINSTORM

CRITERIAAFFIRM

CRITERIAGOAL

SETTING

UPDATED !�."�.�#

FORMAL PROJECT KICK OFF $-/#$

EVALUATION REVIEW REVIEW

PLANNING PLANNINGPLANNING RECOMMENDATIONS

Documents

Portland Community College€¦ · Consultants to Higher Education 1515 Fifteenth Street, NW Ste 613 Washington, DC 20011 202.882.8700 202.726.2251 fax C:\Users\hier\Dropbox (Biddison