PORTFOLIO REVIEW 4th Quarter 2015

Wendy J. Dominguez, MBA

PORTFOLIO REVIEW4th Quarter 2015

Rick Rodgers, AIFA®

Prepared by: Josh Bond

THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK

2INTEGRITY. BALANCE. OBJECTIVITY.

INNOVEST AT A GLANCE

—

———

——

——

———

—

——

—

—

——

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

————

*As of December 2015

Privileged and Confidential


Innovest’s History With Boulder Fire & Police

2001 ‐ 2003

2001: First quarterly performance report

2003: Replace the Putnam International Fund with the American Funds Europacific Growth Fund

2007: Replace the Calamos Growth Fund with Allianz CCM Mid Cap Growth & replace the Legg Mason Small Cap Value Fund with the ICM Small Cap Value

2007: Replace 50% of the allocation to the Europacific Growth Fund (REREX) and allocate it to the Dodge & Cox International Fund

2007: Conducted asset allocation study and updated asset allocation

2007: Coordinated the PIMCO share class change to reduce fees


2009: Add BlackRock High Yield Fund and Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund

Provided quarterly performance reports and research reports each quarter and met with the Trustees

Updated and reviewed the Investment Policy Statement

Met with representatives from each investment strategy used in the plans

2003 ‐ 2006 2006 – 2009 2009 ‐ 2014

2004: Replace the One Group Mid Cap Growth Fund (OSGIX) with the Calamos Growth Fund

2005: Presented on Alternative Investment Vehicles,Asset Classes & Strategies

2005: Added the PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund



2010: Replace Managers Cadence MC Inst. (MCMYX) with Munder Mid Cap Growth

2011: Coordinated the Eaton Vance share class change to reduce fees

Provided quarterly performance reports and research reports each quarter and met with the Administrative Committee

2013: Performed RFI for Administration and Record Keeping Services and Audit Services.


Conducted consultant fee review

Presented core fixed income search


Innovest’s History With Boulder Fire & Police

2015: Replaced PIMCO Total Return with Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund.

Replaced PIMCO Commodity Real Return with Credit Suisse Commodity Return.

Created an automated, online, and permanent Fiduciary File

2015


Performance Over Time

Risk and Return (Since Inception) Asset Allocation

Cumulative Performance over Time

Change in Account ValueLast

QuarterYear To

Date1

Year3

Years5

Years7

YearsSince

InceptionInception

DateBoulder F & P Total Fund 1.93 -3.25 -3.25 6.81 6.34 9.98 9.05 01/01/1985Boulder F & P Custom Benchmark 3.02 -1.26 -1.26 7.52 6.98 10.02 9.55Difference -1.09 -1.99 -1.99 -0.71 -0.64 -0.04 -0.50

Market ValueAs of

10/01/2015

Market ValueAs of

12/31/2015Change

$

Boulder F & P Total Fund 116,035,139 118,384,516 2,349,377

$0 $11,150,317 $22,300,634 $33,450,951 $44,601,268 $55,751,585

VT Retirement Income Advantage

JPMorgan High Yield Select

Met West Total Return

Crdt Suis Comm Rtn Strat

Vantage Trust Plus

Victory Munder Mid Cap Core Growth

ICM Small Company

Eaton Vance Floating Rate; I

Dodge & Cox Int'l

American Funds EuroPacific Gr

Boston Trust Fixed Income - Boulder F&P

Boston Trust Equity - Boulder F&P

$210,331

$2,116,118

$4,292,877

$4,846,113

$7,187,915

$7,224,152

$7,296,884

$7,380,536

$10,544,522

$10,735,829

$12,424,090

$44,125,148

8.5

9.0

9.5

10.0

10.5

11.0

11.5

Ret

urn

(%)

9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0Risk (Standard Deviation %)

S&P 500 Index

Boulder F & P Total Fund

Boulder F & P Total Fund Boulder F & P Custom Benchmark

-600 %

0%

600%

1,200%

1,800%

2,400%

3/85 9/86 3/88 9/89 3/91 9/92 3/94 9/95 3/97 9/98 3/00 9/01 3/03 9/04 3/06 9/07 3/09 9/10 3/12 9/13 12/15

Executive SummaryDecember 31, 2015


1.38%

-4.41%

-0.81%

-14.92%

0.55%

-20.00%

-15.00%

-10.00%

-5.00%

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

S&P 500

Russell 2000

MSCI EAFE

MSCI EM

Barclays US Agg Bond

Year 4Q15

7.04%-0.57%

4.71%

3.59%

0.66%

THE MARKETS

Investment Returns2015

1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter


GLOBAL ECONOMIC GROWTH: SLUGGISH• U.S. real GDP increased by an annual rate of 2.0% in the third

quarter. The long-run average is over 3%, and even higher after recessions.

• U.S. dollar strength has been a significant headwind for U.S. manufacturers and exporters.

• U.S. retail sales excluding gasoline were 3.9% higher in December versus a year ago.

• Of the expected $94 billion growth in all U.S. retail sales in 2015, Amazon took in $22 billion, according to Macquarie.

THE FEDERAL RESERVE: SLOWLY TIGHTENING• The real (after-inflation) Fed Funds rate is still negative,

suggesting that monetary policy remains accommodative.• In December the Federal Funds target was raised by 0.25% to

a range of 0.25%–0.50%, the first increase since 2006.• The Fed is expected to increase rates slowly, unless wages

increase more quickly than currently projected. • While the FOMC has forecasted four rate increases for 2016, at

year-end market participants expected two increases.

Fourth Quarter: GLOBAL ECONOMICS

The After-Inflation Fed Funds Rate

Shaded bands indicate recessions. Source: Capital Economics and Innovest. Reported 1/11/2016.

Economic Growth in the Developed Markets

Q1 2008 GDP = 100. Source: Capital Economics.

Real Rates Below 0% Usually Stimulate the Economy

Real Rates Above 2% Usually Restrict Economic Growth


GLOBAL ECONOMICS, continued

CHINA: GROWING MORE SLOWLY• Chinese exports fell 1.8% in 2015, while imports declined

13.2%. The People’s Bank of China once again intervened to devalue the yuan to spur exports.

• Volatility in China’s currency and stock markets continued to impact investors’ sentiment throughout the world.

• Increasing labor costs have put downward pressure on Chinese corporate profits; however, higher wages boost consumption.

• China’s nominal level of GDP is now five times the size of what it was 10 years ago.

ENERGY: PRICES KEEP FALLING• Domestic oil production remained high, despite active drilling

rigs having declined by about 70% in the last 18 months.• West Texas Intermediate (WTI) started 2015 at $53 a barrel,

was near $60 at mid-year, and then collapsed to the mid-$30s at year-end.

• Global oil production is unlikely to decline soon, as OPEC has promised high production and Iran plans to pump aggressively.

• Lower gasoline prices in 2015 saved the average American driver about $540, as compared to 2014.

China’s Share of the Global Economy

Less Oil Drilling, Stubbornly High Production

Source: Capital Economics.

Reported 1/4/2016. For commodities, average of consumption of steel, copper, aluminum, zinc, tin, lead, nickel, oil, gas, coal, nuclear, cement, pork and rice. Sources: EIU, BP, World Steel Association, OECD, USGS and J.P. Morgan.


STOCKS• In the six previous times that the Fed began to raise short-

term rates, subsequent one-year equity returns varied significantly.

• Developed international equity markets have tended to fare relatively well after the Fed’s previous initial rate hikes.

• The rising U.S. dollar in 2015 dragged down developed markets’ equity returns by 6.6%, and emerging markets equity returns by 9.3%.

• In the third quarter of 2015, S&P 500 earnings fell by 14.1% overall, but rose 3.5% excluding the energy sector.

BONDS• Bonds have provided mixed results subsequent to the six

previous times that the Fed began to raise short-term rates.• The year-end 2.59% yield on the Barclays Aggregate Index

provides little cushion if rates rise across the yield curve.• Taxable bonds in 2015 were challenged by the Fed liftoff,

falling energy prices, and a stronger dollar.• Energy issues pulled down returns on economically sensitive

high yield bonds and floating rate corporate loans.

Fourth Quarter: ASSET CLASS FUNDAMENTALS

Data are from the six rising Fed Funds rate cycles from 1983 to 2005. *The one-year municipal bond returns are based on the four most recent rising-rate periods; the one-year high-yield bond returns are based on the five most recent rising-rate periods; and the one-year floating rate corporate bond returns are based on the three most recent rising-rate periods. Past performance is no indication of future performance. Sources: Morningstar and Innovest.

Data are from the six rising Fed Funds rate cycles from 1983 to 2005. *The one-year emerging markets equity returns are based on the two most recent rising-rate periods. Past performance is no indication of future performance. Sources: Morningstar and Innovest.

Bonds: Average One-Year Returns After Initial Fed Rate Hikes

Stocks: Average One-Year Returns After Initial Fed Rate Hikes

5.4% 2.7%

20.8%22.2%

‐20.0%

‐10.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

Large Cap U.S.Stocks

Small Cap U.S.Stocks

InternationalDevelopedStocks

EmergingMarkets Stocks*

3.0% 2.7% 3.5%

6.1%

‐4.0%‐2.0%

0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%

8.0%10.0%12.0%

Core Fixed Income Municipal FixedIncome*

High Yield FixedIncome*

Floating RateCorporate Loans*


ASSET CLASS FUNDAMENTALS, continued

COMMODITIES• Most commodity prices finished 2015 near their 10-year

lows.• The prices of energy and industrial metals tumbled amid

concerns that China would not be able to absorb high and rising supply.

• China accounts for more than 30% of global consumption of many metals, cotton, rice, and soybean oil.

• McDonald’s reintroduced “The McRib” for a limited time, following a decline in pork prices.

MIDSTREAM ENERGY MLPs• According to Advisory Research, MLPs are currently priced

at a significant discount to their fair valuation.• Factors in the pullback in MLP prices included tax-loss

selling, oil and natural gas price weakness, concerns about MLPs’ growth prospects, and their access to capital markets.

• In the third quarter, 82 midstream companies announced third-quarter distributions that were, on average, 2.0% higher than the second quarter of 2015.

• At year-end, midstream MLPs yielded an average of 8.5%.

Commodity Prices: Near 10-Year Lows

A Z-score is a statistical measurement of a score’s relationship to the mean in a group of scores. Z-scores are calculated using daily prices over the past 10 years. Data are as of 12/31/15. Sources: FactSet and J.P. Morgan Asset Management.

Universe: all energy MLPs, excluding variable pay MLPs. Valuation inputs include yield, EV/Ebitda multiples, and the yield spread to the U.S. Corporate BB bond as of 12/31/2015. Sources: FactSet and Advisory Research.

MLPs: Significantly Undervalued


US Market Indices Performance US Market Sector Performance

Source: Investment Metrics, LLC

Source: Investment Metrics, LLCSource: Investment Metrics, LLC

S&P 500 Index Russell 2000 Index MSCI EAFE Index MSCI Emerging Markets Index

Barclays Capital Aggregate BC Municipal Bond Barclays U.S. Corp: High Yield S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index

Alerian MLP Infrastructure DJ-UBS Commodity Index HFRI FoF Composite Index

0.0

15.0

-15.0

-30.0

-45.0

Re

turn

(%)

1

Quarter

1

Year

0.6

-0.4

-10.5

-24.7

-1.6

-31.7

-2.1-0.7

-2.1-4.5

1.53.3

-0.6

0.50.7

-14.6

4.7

-0.4

3.6

-4.4

7.0

1.4

S&P 500 S&P 500 Growth S&P 500 Value

Russell Midcap Index Russell Midcap Growth Index Russell Midcap Value Index

Russell 2000 Index Russell 2000 Growth Index Russell 2000 Value Index

0.0

6.0

12.0

-6.0

-12.0

Re

turn

(%)

1

Quarter

1

Year

2.9

-7.5

4.3

-1.4

3.6

-4.4

3.1

-4.8

4.1

-0.2

3.6

-2.4

6.1

-3.1

7.9

5.5

7.0

1.4

S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary S&P 500 Consumer Staples S&P 500 Energy

S&P 500 Financials S&P 500 Health Care S&P 500 Industrials

S&P 500 Information Technology S&P 500 Materials S&P 500 Telecom Services

S&P 500 Utilities

0.0

15.0

30.0

-15.0

-30.0

Re

turn

(%)

1

Quarter

1

Year

1.1

-4.8

7.63.4

9.7

-8.4

9.25.9

8.0

-2.5

9.26.96.0

-1.5

0.2

-21.1

7.6 6.65.8

10.1

Quarterly Market Summary December 31, 2015

Copyright © 2015 Investment Metrics, LLC. All rights reserved.


Intl Equity Region Performance Alternative Asset Class Performance

Fixed Income Market Sector Performance

Source: Investment Metrics, LLC

Source: Investment Metrics, LLCSource: Investment Metrics, LLC

Barclays U.S. Aggregate Barclays U.S. Treasury Barclays U.S. Credit Index Barclays U.S. Corp: High Yield

S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Barclays Global Aggregate JPM EMBI Global (USD)

0.0

3.0

-3.0

-6.0

Re

turn

(%)

1

Quarter

1

Year

1.51.2

-0.9

-3.2

-2.1

-0.7

-2.1

-4.5

-0.5-0.8-0.9

0.8

-0.6

0.5

HFRI Fund of Funds Composite Index S&P Developed Property

Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return Alerian MLP Index

0.0

15.0

-15.0

-30.0

-45.0

Re

turn

(%)

1

Quarter

1

Year

-2.8

-32.6

-10.5

-24.7

4.70.90.6

-0.4

MSCI Japan MSCI Pacific ex Japan MSCI United Kingdom

MSCI Europe ex U.K. MSCI Emerging Markets

0.0

10.0

20.0

-10.0

-20.0

-30.0

Re

turn

(%)

1

Quarter

1

Year

0.7

-14.6

3.3

0.10.7

-7.5

8.3

-8.4

9.4 9.9

Quarterly Market Summary December 31, 2015

Copyright © 2015 Investment Metrics, LLC. All rights reserved.


Alternative Asset Class Returns December 31, 2015

Source: Christenson Investment Parnters Source: Christenson Investment Parnters

Source: Christenson Investment Parnters Source: Standard & Poors

‐31.1

‐24.8‐22.0

‐8.7

‐15.5

‐9.2‐5.8 ‐5.5

‐9.5 ‐9.0‐3.9

10.6

‐13.7

2.9

‐10.5

‐5.2 ‐5.0

1.54.5

18.4

‐40.0

‐30.0

‐20.0

‐10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

Heatin

g Oil

Crud

e Oil

Natural Gas

Gasoline

Nickel

Copp

er

Zinc

Alum

inum Corn

Whe

at

Soybeans

Soybean Oil

Hogs

Cattle

Bloo

mbe

rg Com

m Inde

x

Silver

Gold

Coffe

e

Cotton

Sugar

Commodity Sector Returns

‐22.7

‐10.5‐8.2 ‐7.7

‐5.1‐3.5

11.2

‐25.0

‐20.0

‐15.0

‐10.0

‐5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

Energy BloombergComm Index

IndustrialMetals

Grains PreciousMetals

Livestock Softs

Commodity Broad Sector Returns

‐4.3‐2.3 ‐1.8 ‐1.1 ‐0.6

0.0 0.0 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.6

‐10.0

‐5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Dedicated Short B

ias

Even

t Driv

en

Distressed

Managed

Futures

Convertib

le Arbitrage

Fixed Income Arbitrage

Equity M

arket N

eutral

Multi‐Strategy

Globa

l Macro

HFRI FoF

Com

posite

Long/Sho

rt Equ

ity

Hedge Fund Strategy Returns

‐6.1 ‐6.0‐4.7

‐1.8

2.34.4

5.57.0

9.5 9.8

‐8.0‐6.0‐4.0‐2.00.02.04.06.08.0

10.012.0

Emerging

Markets

Canada

United Kingdo

m

Europe

Singap

ore

Japa

n

S&P De

velope

d RE

IT

U.S.

Hon

g Ko

ng

Australia

Global REIT Country and Regional Returns


ASSET CLASS FUNDAMENTALS, continued

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

HighREITs 35.97 %

Commodities16.23 %

Fixed Income5.24 %

Int'l Stocks31.78 %

REITs 28.60 %

REITs 9.24 %

REITs 17.59 %

Smal l Cap Stocks38.82 %

REITs 31.78 %

REITs 4.23 %

REITs 7.31%

REITs 26.28%

High

Int'l Stocks26.34 %

Int'l Stocks11.17 %

Hedge Funds‐21.37 %

REITs 28.60 %


Fixed Income7.84 %

Int'l Stocks17.32 %

Large Cap Stocks32.38 %



Large Cap Stocks7.31%

Smal l Cap Stocks19.70%


Hedge Funds10.25 %

Divers i fed Portfol io‐24.23%


Commodi es16.83 %



Int'l Stocks22.78%

Fixed Income5.97 %

Fixed Income0.55 %

Smal l Cap Stocks6.80%

Int'l Stocks18.41%


Fixed Income6.97 %

Smal l Cap Stocks‐33.79 %



Divers i fied Portfol io‐0.50%


Divers i fied Portfol io14.79%


Hedge Funds‐0.36%


Commodities18.09%

Divers i fied Portfol io13.25 %

Divers i fied Portfol io6.64 %

Commodities‐35.65 %





Hedge Funds8.81 %


Int'l Stocks‐0.81%

Fixed Income4.52%

Large Cap Stocks15.00%

Hedge Funds10.39 %


Large Cap Stocks‐37.00 %

Commodi es18.91 %

Int'l Stocks7.75 %

Hedge Funds‐5.72 %

Hedge Funds5.28 %

REITs 1.86 %

Hedge Funds3.19%

Divers i fied Portfol io‐1.15%

Int'l Stocks3.03%


Fixed Income4.34 %


REITs ‐39.20 %

Hedge Funds11.47 %

Fixed Income6.54 %

Int'l Stocks‐12.14 %

Fixed Income4.21 %

Fixed Income‐2.02 %

Int'l Stocks‐4.90%

Smal l Cap Stocks‐4.41%

Hedge Funds 2.26%

Hedge Funds5.45%

LowCommodi es

2.07 %REITs

‐17.55 %Int'l Stocks‐43.38 %

Fixed Income5.93 %

Hedge Funds5.70 %



Commodi es‐9.53 %

Commodi es‐17.01 %

Commodi es‐24.66%

Commodities ‐6.43%

Fixed Income3.21%

Low

Divers i fied Portfol io: 25% Large Cap Stocks , 10% Smal l Cap Stocks , 12% International Stocks , 25% Fixed Income, 3% REITs , 20% Hedge Funds , and 5% Commodities .

Periodic Table of Returns 2006 ‐ 2015

Avg Annual Returns '06‐'15

Avg Annual Risk

'06‐'15

Indices : Large Cap Stocks (S&P 500), Smal l Cap Stock (Russel l 2000), Int'l Stocks (MSCI EAFE), Fixed Income (Barclays Aggregate), REITs (DJ‐Wilshire REIT), Hedge Funds (HFRI Fund of Funds Compos ite), and Commodities (Bloomberg Commodity).


Client Type: Money Purchase Pension PlanTime Horizon: Greater than Five YearsExpected Return: 3.75% to 4.75% over CPIRisk Tolerances: Expected downside of -17.8% to -20.8% per year based on a statistical confidence level of 95% (1)

Asset Allocation Performance Benchmarks

Strategic Asset Investment Primary Peer GroupLower Limit Allocation Upper Limit Category Manager Index Universe

Domestic Equity Domestic Equity Large Cap Equity* 32.00% 35.00% 38.00% Large Cap Boston Tr Eqty S&P 500 Core Equity

Mid Cap Growth 3.50% 6.50% 9.50% Mid Cap Growth Victory Munder MC Core Gr Russell Mid Cap Index Mid Cap Growth Small Cap Value 3.50% 6.50% 9.50% Small Cap Value ICM Sm Cap Value Russell 2000 Index Small Cap Value

International Equity 16.00% 19.00% 22.00% International Equity Europacific R-4 MSCI EAFE International GrowthDodge & Cox Intl MSCI EAFE International Value

Domestic Fixed Income* 12.00% 15.00% 18.00% Domestic Fixed Income Boston Tr Fixed Inc BC Aggregate Core Bond1.00% 4.00% 7.00% MetWest Total Return BC Aggregate Core Bond

High Yield 0.00% 2.00% 5.00% High Yield JP Morgan HY BC:HY Credit High Yield

Floating Rate Corporate Loans 4.00% 7.00% 10.00% Floating Rate Corporate Loans Eaton Vance Floating CSFB Leveraged Loan Loan Participation

Commodities 2.00% 5.00% 8.00% Commodities Credit Suisse Commodity Bloomberg Commodity N/A100.00%

Total Portfolio Strategic Benchmark: 50.00% 70% S&P 500/30% BC Aggregate6.50% Russell Mid Cap Index 6.50% Russell 2000 Index

19.00% MSCI EAFE4.00% BC Aggregate2.00% BC:HY Credit 7.00% CSFB Leveraged Loan5.00% Bloomberg Commodity

100.00%

Total Portfolio Secondary Benchmark: CPI + 4.75%

*Balanced allocation to Boston Trust is 50% of the portfolio which is split 70% to large cap equity and 30% to domestic fixed income

INVESTMENT POLICY SUMMARY

Client Variables

(1) There is a 5% probability that the 1 year modeled loss of -17.8% to -20.8% will be exceeded. Risk tolerances are based on 2015 capital markets assumptions. NOTE: The 1 year modeled loss will vary from year to year depending on future capital market assumptions.


Boulder Fire & PoliceAverage plan assets $118,384,516Estimated Investment, Recordkeeping and Administrative Costs 0.57%Estimated Total Plan Expenses 0.67%

Weighted average (bps)

Employer Paid Employee Paid TotalAsset based fee retained by funds 48 -$ 572,146$ 572,146$ Revenue sharing paid to plan provider 14 -$ 168,970$ 168,970$ Per participant fee 0 -$ -$ -$ Administration/Recordkeeping fee 0 -$ -$ -$ Custodial/Trust fees 0 -$ -$ -$ Direct participant paid fees

Loan origination 0 -$ -$ -$ Loan maintenance 0 -$ -$ -$ QDRO 0 -$ -$ -$ Miscellaneous 0 -$ -$ -$

Rebate to plan -6 -$ (68,344)$ (68,344)$

Total Investment, Recordkeeping and Administrative Costs 57 -$ 672,773$ 672,773$

Third party plan paid feesInvestment Consultant 6 37,135$ 37,135$ 74,269$

Operating BudgetAudit 1 9,000$ -$ 9,000$ Trustee Education 1 10,500$ -$ 10,500$ Insurance 1 9,000$ -$ 9,000$ Miscellaneous Expenses 0 1,500$ -$ 1,500$ Legal 2 20,000$ -$ 20,000$

Total Plan Expenses 67 87,135$ 709,908$ 797,042$

Total Plan Expenses in Basis Points 7 60 67

Fee review reflects an estimate for the following time period ending: 12/31/2015

Benchmarking: The plan's estimated investment, recordkeeping and administrative costs of 0.57% as shown above, compare favorably to 401(k) Source data, a universe of 49 similarly sized 401(k) plans with an average investment, recordkeeping and administrative cost of 1.12%

Dollars ($)

Total Plan Expenses

Annual Fee Review


September 30, 2015

Allocation Differences

0.0% 4.0% 8.0%-4.0 %-8.0 %

Commodities

Floating Rate Corporate Loans

High Yield

Fixed Income

International Equity

Small Cap Equity

Mid Cap Equity

Large Cap Equity

-0.4 %

0.3%

0.0%

-3.1 %

-1.4 %

-0.2 %

-0.3 %

5.0%

December 31, 2015

Allocation Differences

0.0% 4.0% 8.0% 12.0%-4.0 %-8.0 %

Commodities

Floating Rate Corporate Loans

High Yield

Fixed Income

International Equity

Small Cap Equity

Mid Cap Equity

Large Cap Equity

-0.6 %

-0.4 %

-0.1 %

-3.9 %

0.2%

0.1%

0.0%

4.8%

September 30, 2015Market Value

($)Allocation

(%)Target

(%)Large Cap Equity 43,249,709 40.02 35.00Mid Cap Equity 6,718,803 6.22 6.50Small Cap Equity 6,785,733 6.28 6.50International Equity 19,020,970 17.60 19.00Fixed Income 17,148,253 15.87 19.00High Yield 2,190,391 2.03 2.00Floating Rate Corporate Loans 7,935,477 7.34 7.00Commodities 5,009,026 4.64 5.00Total Fund 108,058,361 100.00 100.00

December 31, 2015Market Value

($)Allocation

(%)Target

(%)Large Cap Equity 44,125,148 39.76 35.00Mid Cap Equity 7,224,152 6.51 6.50Small Cap Equity 7,296,884 6.57 6.50International Equity 21,280,351 19.17 19.00Fixed Income 16,716,967 15.06 19.00High Yield 2,116,118 1.91 2.00Floating Rate Corporate Loans 7,380,536 6.65 7.00Commodities 4,846,113 4.37 5.00Total Fund 110,986,269 100.00 100.00

Asset Allocation vs. Target Allocation


AllocationMarketValue

($)%

Performance(%)

LastQuarter

YearTo Date

1Year

3Years

5Years

10Years

SinceInnovestInception

SinceInception

InceptionDate

Large Cap EquityBoston Trust Equity - Boulder F&P 44,125,148 37.27 5.11 -0.95 -0.95 13.44 10.68 7.56 6.65 10.37 07/01/1990S&P 500 Index 7.04 1.38 1.38 15.13 12.57 7.31 5.00 9.35IM U.S. Large Cap Equity (MF) Median 6.29 0.00 0.00 13.84 11.14 6.49 4.51 8.98

Mid Cap EquityVictory Munder Mid Cap Core Growth 7,224,152 6.10 1.43 -4.36 -4.36 12.11 10.15 7.53 8.15 12.57 01/01/2010Russell Midcap Growth Index 4.12 -0.20 -0.20 14.88 11.54 8.16 5.85 13.89IM U.S. Mid Cap Growth Equity (MF) Median 2.87 -0.49 -0.49 13.14 9.78 7.35 5.44 12.24

Small Cap EquityICM Small Company 7,296,884 6.16 3.44 -3.20 -3.20 10.68 8.57 7.13 9.34 6.18 01/01/2008Russell 2000 Value Index 2.88 -7.47 -7.47 9.06 7.67 5.57 8.17 5.58IM U.S. Small Cap Value Equity (MF) Median 2.52 -7.07 -7.07 9.05 7.81 5.51 8.91 5.51

International EquityDodge & Cox Int'l 10,544,522 8.91 0.83 -11.35 -11.35 3.87 2.65 3.83 N/A 0.23 01/01/2008MSCI EAFE Value Index (Net) 2.68 -5.68 -5.68 3.14 2.55 1.96 3.64 -1.60IM International Large Cap Value Equity (MF) Median 2.61 -2.64 -2.64 2.97 2.07 2.48 2.82 -1.95

American Funds EuroPacific Gr 10,735,829 9.07 2.87 -0.82 -0.82 5.08 3.62 4.58 N/A 6.62 04/01/2004MSCI EAFE Growth Index (Net) 6.67 4.09 4.09 6.83 4.60 4.03 3.32 5.51IM International Large Cap Growth Equity (MF) Median 4.40 -0.57 -0.57 4.15 3.31 4.21 4.27 6.24

Fixed IncomeBoston Trust Fixed Income - Boulder F&P 12,424,090 10.49 -0.54 1.68 1.68 1.05 2.97 4.36 5.08 5.96 07/01/1990Barclays Aggregate Index -0.57 0.55 0.55 1.44 3.25 4.52 4.97 6.27IM U.S. Broad Market Core Fixed Income (MF) Median -0.64 0.01 0.01 1.10 3.14 4.26 4.69 6.17

Met West Total Return 4,292,877 3.63 -0.40 0.29 0.29 2.22 4.69 6.38 6.31 0.29 01/01/2015Barclays Aggregate Index -0.57 0.55 0.55 1.44 3.25 4.52 4.97 0.55IM U.S. Broad Market Core Fixed Income (MF) Median -0.64 0.01 0.01 1.10 3.14 4.26 4.69 0.01

High YieldJPMorgan High Yield Select 2,116,118 1.79 -2.03 -4.54 -4.54 1.58 4.31 6.50 7.18 5.97 01/01/2010Barclays US Corp: High Yield -2.07 -4.47 -4.47 1.69 5.04 6.96 7.59 6.65IM U.S. High Yield Bonds (MF) Median -1.80 -3.96 -3.96 1.36 4.19 5.62 6.38 5.78

Floating Rate Corporate LoansEaton Vance Floating Rate; I 7,380,536 6.23 -2.26 -1.63 -1.63 1.24 2.85 3.42 N/A 8.08 04/01/2009Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index -1.97 -0.39 -0.39 2.58 3.75 4.08 4.44 8.98Loan Participation Mutual Funds Median -2.19 -1.53 -1.53 0.99 2.57 2.99 3.48 7.20

Table of ReturnsDecember 31, 2015

Returns prior to 7/1990 provided by PMC


Table of ReturnsDecember 31, 2015

AllocationMarketValue

($)%

Performance(%)

LastQuarter

YearTo Date

1Year

3Years

5Years

10Years

SinceInnovestInception

SinceInception

InceptionDate

CommoditiesCrdt Suis Comm Rtn Strat 4,846,113 4.09 -10.34 -24.96 -24.96 -17.49 -13.52 -6.46 N/A -24.96 01/01/2015Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return -10.52 -24.66 -24.66 -17.29 -13.47 -6.43 -1.03 -24.66IM Commodities General (MF) Median -9.97 -24.78 -24.78 -17.69 -12.99 -6.46 N/A -24.78

Balanced AccountBoston Trust Balanced - Boulder F&P 56,549,237 47.77 3.74 -0.59 -0.59 10.76 9.12 7.18 6.72 9.92 07/01/199070% S&P/30% BC Aggr 4.77 1.34 1.34 10.99 9.87 6.73 5.27 8.67IM U.S. Balanced (SA+CF) Median 3.13 -1.18 -1.18 8.03 7.95 6.29 6.11 8.76

VT Retirement Income Advantage 210,331 0.18 2.85 -1.10 -1.10 5.88 5.44 N/A N/A 4.56 04/01/2013VT Retirement Income Advantage Custom Index 3.50 0.88 0.88 7.57 6.96 N/A N/A 6.21IM U.S. Balanced (SA+CF) Median 3.13 -1.18 -1.18 8.03 7.95 6.29 6.11 6.06

Stable ValueVantage Trust Plus (gross) 7,187,915 6.07 0.57 2.34 2.34 2.44 2.77 3.72 4.16 3.48 07/01/2007Vantage Trust Plus (net) 0.43 1.77 1.77 1.87 2.20 3.18 N/A 2.93Ryan 3 Yr GIC Master Index 0.31 1.16 1.16 1.09 1.43 2.82 3.45 2.61IM U.S. GIC/Stable Value (SA+CF) Median 0.46 1.81 1.81 1.68 2.15 3.07 3.96 2.81

Total FundBoulder Fire and Police 118,384,516 100.00 1.93 -3.25 -3.25 6.81 6.34 5.99 6.21 9.05 01/01/1985Boulder Fire & Police Custom Benchmark 3.02 -1.26 -1.26 7.52 6.98 5.58 5.39 9.55CPI +4.75% 0.56 5.51 5.51 5.79 6.36 6.69 6.92 7.52

Returns prior to 7/1990 provided by PMC


Plan Sponsor TF Asset Allocation - Public Plan Sponsors (< $100 mm AUM)

Plan Sponsor Peer Group Analysis - Public Plan Sponsors (< $100 mm AUM)

-25.0

0.0

25.0

50.0

75.0Al

loca

tion

(%)

US Equity Intl. Equity US Fixed Income Intl. Fixed Income Alternative Inv. Real Estate CashBoulder Fire and Police 57.21 (6) 19.17 (18) 23.62 (79) 0.00 N/A 0.00 0.00

5th Percentile 57.94 24.10 46.21 8.93 22.26 14.70 6.591st Quartile 50.66 15.81 35.83 4.94 7.85 10.08 2.57

Median 46.00 13.71 30.74 4.66 5.37 7.47 1.403rd Quartile 40.15 11.20 24.60 4.29 3.97 5.07 0.6995th Percentile 27.29 7.57 15.63 3.83 2.71 3.26 0.05

-10.0

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

Ret

urn

1.82.5

-2.0-0.8

5.46.9

5.66.38.09.2

4.45.4

LastQuarter

1Year

3Years

5Years

7Years

10Years

Boulder Fire and Police 1.93 (94) -3.25 (100) 6.81 (78) 6.34 (74) 9.98 (30) 5.99 (43)

Boulder Fire & Police Custom Benchmark 3.01 (50) -1.33 (88) 7.52 (64) 6.98 (53) 10.02 (27) 5.58 (70)

5th Percentile 4.21 2.14 9.78 8.56 10.97 6.891st Quartile 3.42 0.79 8.61 7.80 10.05 6.28Median 3.01 -0.09 7.78 7.03 9.65 5.913rd Quartile 2.46 -0.81 6.85 6.33 9.16 5.4295th Percentile 1.81 -1.99 5.39 5.56 8.01 4.44

Plan Sponsor Peer Group AnalysisAs of December 31,2015


Plan Sponsor TF Asset Allocation - Public Plan Sponors ($100mm - $1 Bln AUM)

Plan Sponsor Peer Group Analysis - All Public Plans ($100mm - $500mm AUM)

-25.0

0.0

25.0

50.0

75.0Al

loca

tion

(%)

US Equity Intl. Equity US Fixed Income Intl. Fixed Income Alternative Inv. Real Estate CashBoulder Fire and Police 57.21 (4) 19.17 (43) 23.62 (49) 0.00 N/A 0.00 0.00

5th Percentile 54.24 29.52 39.55 15.68 29.24 14.32 5.811st Quartile 46.85 22.41 31.43 6.20 17.23 11.23 1.85

Median 38.06 17.97 23.24 5.27 11.93 8.72 0.993rd Quartile 30.55 13.92 17.17 4.41 4.12 5.52 0.5495th Percentile 21.73 8.01 11.44 1.93 1.47 2.53 0.02

-10.0

-4.0

2.0

8.0

14.0

20.0

Ret

urn

1.42.6

-2.4-1.0

3.46.3

4.46.4 7.9

9.5

4.25.6

LastQuarter

1Year

3Years

5Years

7Years

10Years

Boulder Fire and Police 1.93 (89) -3.25 (100) 6.81 (72) 6.34 (76) 9.98 (60) 5.99 (45)

Boulder Fire & Police Custom Benchmark 3.01 (45) -1.33 (77) 7.52 (61) 6.98 (71) 10.02 (60) 5.58 (79)

5th Percentile 4.00 2.54 10.20 9.21 11.83 7.031st Quartile 3.46 0.99 8.87 8.15 10.92 6.25Median 2.96 0.07 8.10 7.32 10.20 5.873rd Quartile 2.58 -0.96 6.31 6.38 9.50 5.6395th Percentile 1.39 -2.39 3.42 4.37 7.88 4.21

Plan Sponsor Peer Group AnalysisAs of December 31,2015


Cumulative Performance Over Time

Risk and Return

Boulder Fire and Police Boulder Fire & Police Custom Benchmark CPI + 4.75%

-500 %

0%

500%

1,000%

1,500%

2,000%

2,500%

3/85 9/86 3/88 9/89 3/91 9/92 3/94 9/95 3/97 9/98 3/00 9/01 3/03 9/04 3/06 9/07 3/09 9/10 3/12 9/13 12/15

8

9

10

11

12

Ret

urn

(%)

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19Risk (Standard Deviation %)

Boulder Fire and Police

S&P 500 Index

Total Portfolio Performance AnalysisAs of December 31,2015




Criteria

Organization People Philosophy& Process

StyleConsistency Asset Base Performance Expenses Overall

Costs

Exp Ratio(%)

MedianExp Ratio

(%)

Ratio ofExp to

Median (%)Boston Trust Balanced - Boulder F&P 0.64 1.15 55.00Victory:MC Core Gr;Y (MGOYX) 1.07 1.30 82.31ICM Small Company;Inst (ICSCX) 0.96 1.31 73.28Dodge & Cox Intl Stock (DODFX) 0.64 1.15 55.65American Funds EuPc;R-4 (REREX) 0.84 1.20 70.00Met West:Total Return;I (MWTIX) 0.44 0.76 57.89Eaton Vance Flt Rt;Ins (EIBLX) 0.74 1.12 66.07JPMorgan:High Yield;Sel (OHYFX) 0.83 1.11 74.77Crdt Suis Cmdty Rtn;Inst (CRSOX) 0.78 1.34 58.21Vantage Trust Plus 0.82 0.73 112.33VT Retirement Income Advantage 1.72 1.72 100.00

Legend For Overall CriteriaNo/Minimum ConcernsMinor ConcernMajor ConcernUnder Review

New No/Minimum ConcernsUpgrade to Minor ConcernDowngrade to Minor ConcernNew Major Concern

Manager Score Factor CommentsVictory:MC Core Gr;Y (MGOYX) Performance The fund's overweight positions in energy and industrials and underweight position in healthcare have led to performance concerns

relative to the fund's peer group where it has performed in the bottom half over the rolling three year period and bottom quartileover the rolling five year period. 2015 performance places it at the bottom quartile relative to its peers again.

Manager Score Card




STRATEGY INFORMATION

ROLLING 3 YEAR RETURN AND PERCENTILE RANKINGS

PEER GROUP ANALYSIS - IM U.S. Balanced (SA+CF)

CALENDAR YEAR RETURNS AND PERCENTILE RANKINGS

RISK VS. RETURN (5 YEARS*)

*If less than 5 years, data is since account inception.

Firm and Management:Domenic Colasacco is a portfoliomanager and president of the Adviser.Mr. Colasacco is also the president ofBoston Trust & InvestmentManagement Company and has servedas its Chief Investment Officer since1980. Mr. Colasacco managesportfolios for individual and institutionalclients and also manages the BostonTrust Equity Fund. Mr. Colasacco is aholder of the Chartered FinancialAnalyst (CFA) designation and amember of the Boston SecurityAnalysts Society.

Investment Strategy:The strategy strives to provide long-term growth of capital through adiversified portfolio of stocks, bondsand money market investments. Theallocation among these assets isactively managed based both on theirrelative values and the changingeconomic outlook. By forecastingfinancial market returns across a widerange of possible economic scenarios,they vary the allocation in a mannerthat is designed to provide protectionagainst falling markets in unfavorableeconomic environments, while alsoproviding opportunity to participate inrising markets. The strategy providesbroad diversification across stockmarket sectors; individual equityselections focus on companies withsuperior financial track records.

-20.0

-12.0

-4.0

4.0

12.0

20.0

Ret

urn

LastQuarter

YearTo Date

1Year

3Years

5Years

7Years

10Years

Boston Tr Bal - Boulder F&P 3.74 (29) -0.59 (44) -0.59 (44) 10.76 (15) 9.12 (18) 10.99 (40) 7.18 (26)

70% S&P/30% BC Aggr 4.77 (13) 1.34 (18) 1.34 (18) 10.99 (13) 9.87 (7) 11.75 (21) 6.73 (35)

Median 3.13 -1.18 -1.18 8.03 7.95 10.32 6.29

-8.0

-4.0

0.0

4.0

8.0

12.0

16.0

Ret

urn

(%)

0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 16.0Risk (Standard Deviation %)

Return StandardDeviation

Boston Tr Bal - Boulder F&P 9.12 8.79

70% S&P/30% BC Aggr 9.87 8.41

Median 7.95 9.03

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008Boston Tr Bal - Boulder F&P 11.13 (12) 23.02 (24) 10.04 (72) 3.45 (24) 14.13 (27) 17.53 (77) -20.93 (38)IM U.S. Balanced (SA+CF) Median 7.08 18.94 11.13 1.51 12.41 20.67 -22.51

70% S&P/30% BC Aggr 11.39 (10) 21.12 (30) 12.49 (35) 4.08 (21) 12.92 (40) 20.44 (52) -26.03 (75)IM U.S. Balanced (SA+CF) Median 7.08 18.94 11.13 1.51 12.41 20.67 -22.51

3Years

EndingDec-2015

3Years

EndingDec-2014

3Years

EndingDec-2013

3Years

EndingDec-2012

3Years

EndingDec-2011

3Years

EndingDec-2010

3Years

EndingDec-2009

Boston Tr Bal - Boulder F&P 10.76 (15) 14.58 (25) 11.88 (19) 9.12 (22) 11.54 (47) 1.98 (39) 1.13 (28)IM U.S. Balanced (SA+CF) Median 8.03 12.98 10.63 8.51 11.39 1.44 0.11

70% S&P/30% BC Aggr 10.99 (13) 14.92 (23) 12.35 (14) 9.75 (13) 12.28 (39) 0.20 (69) -1.87 (81)IM U.S. Balanced (SA+CF) Median 8.03 12.98 10.63 8.51 11.39 1.44 0.11

Boston Tr Bal - Boulder F&P 12/31/15




PEER GROUP ANALYSIS - IM U.S. Large Cap Core Equity (SA+CF)





Investment Strategy:The portfolio consists of stocks from allmarket capitalizations; small, mediumand large. The portfolio is constructedwith a bottom up approach to securityselection, however, macro themes areconsidered in deciding which sectorslook most attractive. Each potentialholding is put through a number ofscreens which consider earningsgrowth and relative valuation.

-12.0

-4.0

4.0

12.0

20.0

28.0

Ret

urn

LastQuarter

YearTo Date

1Year

3Years

5Years

7Years

10Years

Boston TrEq - Boulder F&P 5.11 (73) -0.95 (76) -0.95 (76) 13.44 (78) 10.68 (81) 13.40 (83) 7.56 (59)

S&P 500 Index 7.04 (25) 1.38 (51) 1.38 (51) 15.13 (53) 12.57 (53) 14.81 (57) 7.31 (70)

Median 5.94 1.39 1.39 15.26 12.63 14.94 7.75

3.0

6.0

9.0

12.0

15.0

18.0

Ret

urn

(%)



Boston TrEq - Boulder F&P 10.68 11.98

S&P 500 Index 12.57 12.46

Median 12.63 13.04

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008Boston TrEq - Boulder F&P 13.00 (57) 30.44 (78) 12.03 (85) 1.56 (56) 16.91 (24) 24.19 (65) -30.73 (17)IM U.S. Large Cap Core Equity (SA+CF) Median 13.41 33.21 15.66 1.98 14.80 26.53 -35.97

S&P 500 Index 13.69 (45) 32.39 (60) 16.00 (46) 2.11 (50) 15.06 (44) 26.46 (51) -37.00 (62)IM U.S. Large Cap Core Equity (SA+CF) Median 13.41 33.21 15.66 1.98 14.80 26.53 -35.97

3Years

EndingDec-2015

3Years

EndingDec-2014

3Years

EndingDec-2013

3Years

EndingDec-2012

3Years

EndingDec-2011

3Years

EndingDec-2010

3Years

EndingDec-2009

Boston TrEq - Boulder F&P 13.44 (78) 18.20 (80) 14.06 (82) 9.97 (65) 13.82 (56) 0.19 (18) -1.29 (17)IM U.S. Large Cap Core Equity (SA+CF) Median 15.26 20.69 16.37 10.67 14.08 -1.83 -4.31

S&P 500 Index 15.13 (53) 20.41 (57) 16.18 (56) 10.87 (48) 14.11 (49) -2.85 (69) -5.63 (74)IM U.S. Large Cap Core Equity (SA+CF) Median 15.26 20.69 16.37 10.67 14.08 -1.83 -4.31

Boston TrEq - Boulder F&P 12/31/15


TOP TEN HOLDINGS PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS

DISTRIBUTION OF MARKET CAP SECTOR DISTRIBUTION

PortfolioWeight

(%)

BenchmarkWeight

(%)

ActiveWeight

(%)

QuarterlyReturn

(%)Microsoft Corp 3.01 2.48 0.53 26.20Apple Inc 2.95 3.28 -0.33 -4.16Nike Inc 2.76 0.47 2.29 1.90Johnson & Johnson 2.48 1.59 0.89 10.843M Co 2.32 0.52 1.80 6.95Express Scripts Holding Co 2.21 0.33 1.88 7.97Exxon Mobil Corp 2.10 1.81 0.29 5.78Alphabet Inc 2.10 1.26 0.84 24.73Comcast Corp 2.08 0.77 1.31 -0.38Accenture PLC 2.06 0.36 1.70 7.49

% of Portfolio 24.07 12.87

Portfolio BenchmarkWtd. Avg. Mkt. Cap ($) 121,396,213,136 137,341,633,345Median Mkt. Cap ($) 59,113,285,160 17,668,607,200Price/Earnings ratio 19.71 19.30Price/Book ratio 3.22 3.105 Yr. EPS Growth Rate (%) 7.89 7.89Current Yield (%) 1.97 2.17Beta (5 Years, Monthly) 0.95 1.00Number of Stocks 69 504

Boston Trust Equity - Composite S&P 500 Index

0.0

15.0

30.0

45.0

60.0

>100 Bil 75 Bil - 100 Bil 25 Bil - 75 Bil 15 Bil - 25 Bil 2 Bil - 15 Bil 0 - 2 Bil

44.4

7.2

27.8

9.8 10.8

0.0

32.6

8.8

31.1

11.2

16.3

0.0

Boston Trust Equity - Composite

S&P 500 Index

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0

Utilities

Telecommunication Services

Materials

Information Technology

Industrials

Health Care

Financials

Energy

Consumer Staples

Consumer Discretionary

2.0

0.0

3.4

19.5

12.3

17.1

16.9

5.3

11.6

12.1

3.0

2.4

2.8

20.7

10.0

15.2

16.5

6.5

10.1

12.9

Boston Trust Equity - Composite 12/31/15


PERFORMANCE - 1 Quarter TOTAL ATTRIBUTION - 1 Quarter

ACTIVE RETURN - 1 Quarter


S&P 500 Index

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0-5.0-10.0

Utilities


Materials


Industrials

Health Care

Financials

Energy

Consumer Staples


-4.1

7.1

11.6

7.8

2.8

9.4

5.6

5.6

4.5

-1.2

1.1

7.6

9.9

9.0

8.1

9.2

6.0

0.2

7.6

5.8

0.0 0.4 0.8-0.4-0.8-1.2-1.6

Utilities


Materials


Industrials

Health Care

Financials

Energy

Consumer Staples


-0.1

0.0

0.0

-0.2

-0.7

0.0

0.0

0.4

-0.4

-1.0

Buy-and-Hold Portfolio 5.01Portfolio Trading 0.37Actual Return 5.39Benchmark Return 7.04Actual Active Return -1.66

Stock Selection -1.77Sector Selection 0.14Interaction -0.36Total Selection -1.99

Portfolio Trading 0.37Benchmark Trading 0.04Active Trading Impact 0.33

Buy & Hold Active Return -1.66



PERFORMANCE - 3 Years TOTAL ATTRIBUTION - 3 Years

ACTIVE RETURN - 3 Years


S&P 500 Index

0.0 8.0 16.0 24.0 32.0-8.0-16.0

Utilities


Materials


Industrials

Health Care

Financials

Energy

Consumer Staples


2.7

7.1

18.2

15.1

7.5

18.0

15.0

-1.1

9.8

19.8

11.5

5.7

7.3

17.9

14.7

23.5

15.5

-3.1

16.0

20.0

0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2-0.4-0.8-1.2-1.6

Utilities


Materials


Industrials

Health Care

Financials

Energy

Consumer Staples


0.1

0.2

0.5

-0.6

-1.1

-0.6

-0.1

0.2

-0.8

0.0

Buy-and-Hold Portfolio 12.95Portfolio Trading 0.42Actual Return 13.37Benchmark Return 15.13Actual Active Return -1.76

Stock Selection -2.09Sector Selection 0.23Interaction -0.31Total Selection -2.16

Portfolio Trading 0.42Benchmark Trading 0.01Active Trading Impact 0.41

Buy & Hold Active Return -1.76





PEER GROUP ANALYSIS - IM U.S. Fixed Income (SA+CF)





Investment Strategy:Boston Trust's approach to fixedincome investing combines top downeconomic scenario forecasts withbottom up fundamental research. Usingmacroeconomic-based quantitativetools, the investment team forecastsinterest rate changes for a range ofpossible economic outcomes. Theseforecasts contribute to portfoliostrategies with respect to interest ratesand the yield curve. In selectingindividual securities, Boston Trustapplies long-held standards for superiorfinancial quality, appropriate risk, anddiversification.

-10.0

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Ret

urn

LastQuarter

YearTo Date

1Year

3Years

5Years

7Years

10Years

Boston Tr FI - Boulder F&P -0.54 (61) 1.68 (14) 1.68 (14) 1.05 (82) 2.97 (72) 3.75 (76) 4.36 (68)

Barclays Agg -0.57 (63) 0.55 (55) 0.55 (55) 1.44 (66) 3.25 (66) 4.09 (72) 4.52 (64)

Median -0.43 0.69 0.69 1.77 3.86 5.29 4.88

-3.0

0.0

3.0

6.0

9.0

Ret

urn

(%)

-4.0 0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 16.0Risk (Standard Deviation %)


Boston Tr FI - Boulder F&P 2.97 2.58

Barclays Agg 3.25 2.79

Median 3.86 2.80

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008Boston Tr FI - Boulder F&P 3.71 (58) -2.15 (84) 4.08 (75) 7.76 (33) 6.55 (65) 4.93 (83) 5.33 (23)IM U.S. Fixed Income (SA+CF) Median 4.42 -0.25 6.83 6.41 7.59 10.53 1.31

Barclays Agg 5.97 (36) -2.02 (81) 4.21 (74) 7.84 (32) 6.54 (65) 5.93 (78) 5.24 (24)IM U.S. Fixed Income (SA+CF) Median 4.42 -0.25 6.83 6.41 7.59 10.53 1.31

3Years

EndingDec-2015

3Years

EndingDec-2014

3Years

EndingDec-2013

3Years

EndingDec-2012

3Years

EndingDec-2011

3Years

EndingDec-2010

3Years

EndingDec-2009

Boston Tr FI - Boulder F&P 1.05 (82) 1.84 (83) 3.15 (74) 6.12 (67) 6.41 (73) 5.60 (64) 6.22 (42)IM U.S. Fixed Income (SA+CF) Median 1.77 3.88 4.30 7.19 8.76 6.33 5.84

Barclays Agg 1.44 (66) 2.66 (70) 3.26 (72) 6.19 (66) 6.77 (69) 5.90 (59) 6.04 (46)IM U.S. Fixed Income (SA+CF) Median 1.77 3.88 4.30 7.19 8.76 6.33 5.84

Boston Tr FI - Boulder F&P 12/31/15


TOP TEN HOLDINGS

PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS vs. Barclays Aggregate Index

CREDIT QUALITY DISTRIBUTION vs. Barclays Aggregate Index

SECTOR DISTRIBUTION vs. Barclays Aggregate Index

MATURITY DISTRIBUTION vs. Barclays Aggregate Index

Portfolio BenchmarkEffective Duration 5.40 5.68Avg. Maturity 6.55 7.94Avg. Quality AA Aa2Yield To Maturity (%) 2.18 2.51Holdings Count 25 9,720

Boston Trust Fixed Income - Boulder F&P Barclays Aggregate Index

0.0

15.0

30.0

45.0

60.0

75.0

US Tr e

asurie

s

A gencie

sM BS

A BS

CM BSC re

di t

Other

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

7.4

57.2

3.10.0 0.0

28.2

4.1

Boston Trust Fixed Income - Boulder F&PCompany %

FED HOME LN 2.875% 6/14/24 2.27FED HOME LN MTG 2.375% 1/13/22 2.26FED NAT MTG ASSN 2.625% 9/6/24 1.80TREASURY INFL IDX .625% 01/15/ 1.43FED FARM CR BKS 3.500% 12/20/2 0.95FED HOME LOAN BANK 2.250% 3/11 0.90FHLB 2.750% 12/13/24 0.89PRINCETON UNIVERSITY 4.950% 03 0.79HUBBELL INC 5.950% 6 0.77FED NATL MTG ASSN 1.875% 02/19 0.72


0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

A AA AA AB BB BB NR

72.4

3.7

10.713.2

0.0 0.0

68.6

0.0

24.0

4.20.0

3.2


0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

0 to

3 Y ea

rs

3 to

5 Y ea

rs

6 to

10 Y ea

rs

11 to

20 Y ea

rs

20+ Y ea

rs

22.226.6

36.7

3.3

11.215.5 16.5

64.9

0.13.0

Boston Trust Fixed Income - Boulder F&P 12/31/15


FUND INFORMATION


PEER GROUP ANALYSIS - IM U.S. Mid Cap Growth Equity (MF)



*If less than 5 years, data is since inception of fund share class.

Firm and Management:Tony Dong has been the lead managerhere since February 2001. He's workedat Munder since 1988 and managedlarge-cap, growth-at-a-reasonable pricestrategies before taking over this fund.He's backed here by four comanagers:Andy Mui, Brian Matuszak, GeorgeSanders, and Geoffrey Wilson.

Investment Strategy:The Munder team seek companies thattrade cheaply relative to their growthprospects, using a broad range ofvaluation measures. They keep theFund's sector weightings within 3percentage points of those of the fund'sbenchmark, the S&P Midcap 400 Index.They'll typically hold 70-100 stocks andcap position sizes at 3%. And they'rerelatively patient investors; portfolioturnover has averaged around 50%.

Innovest's Assessment:Munder’s low beta bias is likely tooutperform during market drawdownsand when quality growth companies arein favor. Underperformance is expectedwhen low quality, high beta companiesoutpace high quality securities andduring speculative growth rallies.

-20.0

-12.0

-4.0

4.0

12.0

20.0

28.0

Ret

urn

LastQuarter

YearTo Date

1Year

3Years

5Years

7Years

10Years

Victory Munder MC Core Gr 1.43 (83) -4.36 (80) -4.36 (80) 12.11 (63) 10.15 (45) 15.26 (56) 7.53 (44)

Russell Midcap Growth Index 4.12 (33) -0.20 (49) -0.20 (49) 14.88 (25) 11.54 (21) 18.04 (9) 8.16 (29)

Median 2.87 -0.49 -0.49 13.14 9.78 15.40 7.35

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

Ret

urn

(%)



Victory Munder MC Core Gr 10.15 13.49

Russell Midcap Growth Index 11.54 13.61

Median 9.78 14.11

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008Victory Munder MC Core Gr 10.17 (23) 33.71 (64) 16.01 (28) -0.77 (23) 25.48 (49) 32.80 (70) -43.45 (41)Russell Midcap Growth Index 11.90 (13) 35.74 (48) 15.81 (30) -1.65 (28) 26.38 (44) 46.29 (24) -44.32 (46)IM U.S. Mid Cap Growth Equity (MF) Median 7.40 35.50 14.18 -4.65 25.34 40.04 -45.01

3Years

EndingDec-2015

3Years

EndingDec-2014

3Years

EndingDec-2013

3Years

EndingDec-2012

3Years

EndingDec-2011

3Years

EndingDec-2010

3Years

EndingDec-2009

Victory Munder MC Core Gr 12.11 (63) 19.56 (36) 15.46 (23) 13.04 (18) 18.25 (56) -1.96 (61) -3.15 (53)Russell Midcap Growth Index 14.88 (25) 20.71 (19) 15.63 (22) 12.91 (20) 22.06 (16) 0.97 (37) -3.18 (53)IM U.S. Mid Cap Growth Equity (MF) Median 13.14 18.37 13.90 11.11 18.72 -0.79 -2.99

Victory Munder MC Core Gr 12/31/15


TOP 10 HOLDINGS

STYLE MAP (07/01/98 - 12/31/15)

SECTOR ALLOCATIONASSET ALLOCATION

PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS

UP/DOWN CAPTURE (01/01/11 - 12/31/15)

L Brands Inc ORD 1.99 %SBA Communications Corp ORD 1.94 %Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc ORD 1.88 %Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp ORD 1.88 %Avago Technologies Ltd ORD 1.84 %Advance Auto Parts Inc ORD 1.74 %Affiliated Managers Group Inc ORD 1.73 %Radian Group Inc ORD 1.71 %Lincoln National Corp ORD 1.71 %Macerich Co 1.70 %

Total Securities 85Avg. Market Cap $12,538 MillionP/E 27.80P/B 4.73Div. Yield 1.78%Annual EPS 20.235Yr EPS 21.553Yr EPS Growth 21.69

3 Years 5 Yearsvs. Russell Midcap Growth IndexBeta 0.96 0.97

Victory Munder MC Core Gr Russell Midcap Growth Index

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0

UtilitiesTelecommunication Services

MaterialsInformation Technology

IndustrialsHealth Care

FinancialsEnergy

Consumer StaplesConsumer Discretionary

Other

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 125.0%

Other

Fixed Income

Convertibles

Cash

Equities

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.2%

99.8%

Style History Dec-2015

Average Style Exposure

Cap

italiz

atio

n

Manager Style

Large Cap Growth

Small Cap GrowthSmall Cap Value

Large Cap Value

Victory Munder MC Core Gr

50.0

75.0

100.0

125.0

150.0U

p C

aptu

re

50.0 70.0 90.0 110.0 130.0 150.0Down Capture

Victory Munder MC Core Gr 12/31/15


FUND INFORMATION


PEER GROUP ANALYSIS - IM U.S. Small Cap Value Equity (MF)




Firm and Management:ICM's Small Cap Value effort began in1989, and today Bill Heaphy, ChiefInvestment Officer, and Sim Wootenserve as co-portfolio managers of theICM Small Company Portfolio. Bothhave research responsibilities and Billserves as Director of Research for thesmall cap team. Gary Merwitz, RobJacapraro, Josh Overholt and MattFleming are analysts on the small capteam.

Investment Strategy:Management starts with a universe ofstocks with market caps of around $1billion and narrows the list throughscreens and company analysis. Theteam favors well-managed companieswith good growth prospects that aretrading at attractive valuations. It tendsto sell when valuations get too high orwhen the company doesn't meetexpectations.

Innovest's Assessment:The strategy should outperform in downand stable markets and when lessercapitalized companies are leading. Thefund should underperform during bullmarkets when companies with little orno earnings are in vogue due to itssensitivity to high valuations; althoughthis may be subdued due to its higherweighting of lesser capitalizedcompanies. The fund should alsounderperform when financials andutilities lead due to management'sperpetual aversion to the sectors.

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

Ret

urn

LastQuarter

YearTo Date

1Year

3Years

5Years

7Years

10Years

ICM Small Company 3.44 (35) -3.20 (14) -3.20 (14) 10.68 (25) 8.57 (29) 13.92 (36) 7.13 (15)

Russell 2000 Value Index 2.88 (44) -7.47 (56) -7.47 (56) 9.06 (50) 7.67 (52) 11.72 (79) 5.57 (50)

Median 2.52 -7.07 -7.07 9.05 7.81 13.27 5.51

-2.5

0.0

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

12.5

Ret

urn

(%)



ICM Small Company 8.57 15.88

Russell 2000 Value Index 7.67 15.20

Median 7.81 15.27

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008ICM Small Company 2.87 (55) 36.16 (40) 16.93 (41) -4.85 (59) 22.73 (79) 34.46 (30) -35.11 (65)Russell 2000 Value Index 4.22 (34) 34.52 (56) 18.05 (33) -5.50 (64) 24.50 (60) 20.58 (80) -28.92 (25)IM U.S. Small Cap Value Equity (MF) Median 3.30 35.08 16.25 -3.78 24.99 28.27 -32.16

3Years

EndingDec-2015

3Years

EndingDec-2014

3Years

EndingDec-2013

3Years

EndingDec-2012

3Years

EndingDec-2011

3Years

EndingDec-2010

3Years

EndingDec-2009

ICM Small Company 10.68 (25) 17.88 (52) 14.85 (48) 10.94 (62) 16.23 (48) 2.31 (64) -3.39 (21)Russell 2000 Value Index 9.06 (50) 18.29 (43) 14.49 (55) 11.57 (49) 12.36 (95) 2.19 (65) -8.22 (55)IM U.S. Small Cap Value Equity (MF) Median 9.05 17.94 14.78 11.50 16.20 3.19 -7.52

ICM Small Company 12/31/15


TOP 10 HOLDINGS

STYLE MAP (05/01/89 - 12/31/15)

SECTOR ALLOCATIONASSET ALLOCATION

PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS

UP/DOWN CAPTURE (01/01/11 - 12/31/15)

Dreyfus Treasury Prime Cash Management;Inst 2.60 %Ameris Bancorp ORD 1.59 %Kite Realty Group Trust 1.45 %Hanmi Financial Corp ORD 1.43 %Belden Inc ORD 1.42 %Integrated Device Technology Inc ORD 1.34 %NorthWestern Corp ORD 1.28 %South State Corp ORD 1.25 %Idacorp Inc ORD 1.25 %Ascena Retail Group Inc ORD 1.25 %

Total Securities 120Avg. Market Cap $1,496 MillionP/E 27.14P/B 1.87Div. Yield 2.33%Annual EPS 15.035Yr EPS 11.173Yr EPS Growth 6.48

3 Years 5 Yearsvs. Russell 2000 Value IndexBeta 1.01 1.03

ICM Small Company Russell 2000 Value Index

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0




FinancialsEnergy


Other

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 125.0%

Other

Fixed Income

Convertibles

Cash

Equities

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

2.6%

97.4%



Cap

italiz

atio

n

Manager Style

Large Cap Growth

Small Cap GrowthSmall Cap Value

Large Cap Value

ICM Small Company

50.0

75.0

100.0

125.0

150.0U

p C

aptu

re

50.0 70.0 90.0 110.0 130.0 150.0Down Capture

ICM Small Company 12/31/15


FUND INFORMATION


PEER GROUP ANALYSIS - IM International Large Cap Value Equity (MF)




Firm and ManagementThe International Stock Fund ismanaged by the InternationalInvestment Policy Committee. The ninemembers of this committee have anaverage tenure at Dodge & Cox of 24years. In addition, all the firm's analystsare involved in security selection due totheir global coverage responsibilities.

Investment StrategyThe Fund invests primarily in adiversified portfolio of equity securitiesissued by non-U.S. companies from atleast three different countries, includingemerging markets. The Fund focuseson countries whose economic andpolitical systems appear more stableand are believed to provide someprotection to foreign shareholders. TheFund invests primarily in medium-to-large well established companiesbased on standards of the applicablemarket. In selecting investments, theFund invests primarily in companiesthat, in Dodge & Cox’s opinion, appearto be temporarily undervalued by thestock market but have a favorableoutlook for long-term growth.

Innovest's AssessmentWe believe this collaborative researchapproach will continue generatingshareholder value over full marketcycles; however, performance maysuffer during periods driven by moremacroeconomic events or a disregardfor company specific fundamentals.The strategy’s notable allocation todeveloping countries also suggests thatrelative performance may be partiallydictated by the market’s preference foremerging market securities.

-20.0

-15.0

-10.0

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

Ret

urn

LastQuarter

YearTo Date

1Year

3Years

5Years

7Years

10Years

Dodge & Cox Intl 0.83 (99) -11.35 (100) -11.35 (100) 3.87 (32) 2.65 (34) 9.69 (3) 3.83 (17)

MSCI EAFE Value Idx 2.68 (46) -5.68 (92) -5.68 (92) 3.14 (44) 2.55 (39) 6.67 (25) 1.96 (64)

Median 2.61 -2.64 -2.64 2.97 2.07 6.22 2.48

-1.5

0.0

1.5

3.0

4.5

Ret

urn

(%)

12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0Risk (Standard Deviation %)


Dodge & Cox Intl 2.65 15.93

MSCI EAFE Value Idx 2.55 15.68

Median 2.07 14.97

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008Dodge & Cox Intl 0.08 (1) 26.31 (1) 21.03 (5) -15.97 (80) 13.69 (7) 47.46 (7) -46.69 (63)MSCI EAFE Value Idx -5.39 (25) 22.95 (9) 17.69 (44) -12.17 (34) 3.25 (77) 34.23 (25) -44.09 (48)IM International Large Cap Value Equity (MF) Median -8.37 21.25 17.18 -13.48 5.39 27.94 -44.32

3Years

EndingDec-2015

3Years

EndingDec-2014

3Years

EndingDec-2013

3Years

EndingDec-2012

3Years

EndingDec-2011

3Years

EndingDec-2010

3Years

EndingDec-2009

Dodge & Cox Intl 3.87 (32) 15.23 (1) 8.71 (12) 4.96 (5) 12.10 (9) -3.67 (7) -4.24 (10)MSCI EAFE Value Idx 3.14 (44) 11.04 (1) 8.32 (18) 2.19 (55) 6.77 (25) -8.15 (33) -7.35 (42)IM International Large Cap Value Equity (MF) Median 2.97 9.35 7.14 2.49 6.07 -9.13 -7.40

Dodge & Cox Intl 12/31/15


TOP 10 HOLDINGSPORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS

STYLE MAP (06/01/01 - 12/31/15)

SECTOR ALLOCATION

ASSET ALLOCATION

REGION ALLOCATION

TOP 5 COUNTRIES

UP/DOWN CAPTURE (01/01/11 - 12/31/15)

Sanofi SA ORD 4.03 %Naspers Ltd ORD 3.90 %Schlumberger NV ORD 3.24 %Roche Holding AG Par 3.20 %Barclays PLC ORD 2.79 %HP Inc ORD 2.49 %Samsung Electronics Co Ltd ORD 2.48 %Credit Suisse Group AG ORD 2.32 %Novartis AG DR 2.31 %Standard Chartered PLC ORD 2.07 %

Total Securities 90Avg. Market Cap $64,313 MillionP/E 23.06P/B 2.85Div. Yield 3.04%

0.0% 50.0% 100.0% 150.0%

Fixed Income

Convertibles

Other

Cash

Equities

0.0%

0.0%

0.2%

0.7%

99.1%

Switzerland 14.26 %United Kingdom 13.34 %Japan 12.80 %France 9.30 %Germany 6.27 %

3 Years 5 Yearsvs. MSCI EAFE Value IdxBeta 0.95 0.97

Dodge & Cox Intl MSCI EAFE Value Idx

0.0 8.0 16.0 24.0 32.0 40.0 48.0




FinancialsEnergy


Dodge & Cox Intl MSCI EAFE Value Idx

0.0 8.0 16.0 24.0 32.0 40.0 48.0 56.0

OtherFrontier Markets

Middle EastUnited Kingdom

Europe ex UKJapan

Pacific ex JapanEM Mid East+Africa

North AmericaEM Latin America

EM EuropeEM Asia



Cap

italiz

atio

n

Manager Style

MSCI EAFE Growth Index

MSCI Emerging Markets IndexMSCI EAFE Small Cap

MSCI EAFE Value Index

Dodge & Cox Intl

50.0

75.0

100.0

125.0

150.0

Up

Cap

ture

50.0 70.0 90.0 110.0 130.0 150.0Down Capture

Dodge & Cox Intl 12/31/15


FUND INFORMATION


PEER GROUP ANALYSIS - IM International Large Cap Growth Equity (MF)




Firm and Management:Like all American Funds, this fundboasts many experienced managers,most of whom have been with thecompany for more than a decade. Thismultimanager system eases personneltransitions, like the June 2014departure of long-time manager RobertLovelace, who moved to an affiliate.Each of the fund's nine managers runsa portion of the fund's assetsindependently. In addition, a portion ofthe portfolio (less than 25% of assets)is run by the firm's analyst staff.

Investment Strategy:This fund's managers are focused onlong term capital growth. They primarilyinvest in common stocks of Europeanand Pacific Basin issuers that haveprospects of above average capitalappreciation. The managers may usecash to moderate volatility, typicallyholding 5-10% of fund assets in cash.The Fund usually has a stake inemerging-markets companies and willsometimes hold preferred stock andconvertibles debt.

Innovest's Assessment:The fund’s propensity to focus intenselyon bottom-up, fundamental factors canlead to periods of underperformancewhen the market is less concernedabout company fundamentals and moredriven by thematic and macroeconomicfactors. Additionally, the fund is likely tolag when highly cyclical stocks andgenerally lower quality companiessignificantly outperform the overallmarket. Finally, the fund’s immenseasset base is likely to present somechallenges in the fund’s ability to buildmeaningful positions in smallercompanies and opportunistically tradein less liquid markets.

-12.0

-8.0

-4.0

0.0

4.0

8.0

12.0

16.0

Ret

urn

LastQuarter

YearTo Date

1Year

3Years

5Years

7Years

10Years

American Funds EuPc 2.87 (78) -0.82 (59) -0.82 (59) 5.08 (22) 3.63 (41) 8.92 (36) 4.60 (36)

MSCI EAFE Growth Index (Net) 6.67 (4) 4.09 (8) 4.09 (8) 6.83 (4) 4.60 (18) 8.92 (37) 4.03 (58)

Median 4.40 -0.57 -0.57 4.15 3.31 8.58 4.21

-1.5

0.0

1.5

3.0

4.5

6.0

7.5

Ret

urn

(%)



American Funds EuPc 3.63 13.70

MSCI EAFE Growth Index (Net) 4.60 14.40

Median 3.31 14.48

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008American Funds EuPc -2.64 (28) 20.15 (33) 19.21 (44) -13.58 (48) 9.40 (64) 39.10 (19) -40.53 (16)MSCI EAFE Growth Index (Net) -4.43 (43) 22.55 (13) 16.86 (70) -12.11 (31) 12.25 (37) 29.36 (71) -42.70 (45)IM International Large Cap Growth Equity (MF) Median -4.98 18.39 18.85 -13.61 11.10 33.27 -43.61

3Years

EndingDec-2015

3Years

EndingDec-2014

3Years

EndingDec-2013

3Years

EndingDec-2012

3Years

EndingDec-2011

3Years

EndingDec-2010

3Years

EndingDec-2009

American Funds EuPc 5.08 (22) 11.72 (20) 7.37 (45) 4.07 (58) 9.56 (41) -3.27 (12) -0.53 (5)MSCI EAFE Growth Index (Net) 6.83 (4) 11.03 (37) 7.97 (33) 4.85 (34) 8.47 (69) -5.94 (48) -4.78 (52)IM International Large Cap Growth Equity (MF) Median 4.15 10.65 7.32 4.32 9.31 -6.08 -4.75

American Funds EuPc 12/31/15


TOP 10 HOLDINGSPORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS

STYLE MAP (05/01/84 - 12/31/15)

SECTOR ALLOCATION

ASSET ALLOCATION

REGION ALLOCATION

TOP 5 COUNTRIES

UP/DOWN CAPTURE (01/01/11 - 12/31/15)

Novo Nordisk A/S ORD 4.65 %Novartis AG ORD 2.46 %Barclays PLC ORD 2.29 %SoftBank Group Corp ORD 2.10 %Associated British Foods PLC ORD 1.80 %Prudential PLC ORD 1.78 %Bayer AG ORD 1.71 %HDFC Bank Ltd ORD 1.69 %Nintendo Co Ltd ORD 1.69 %Baidu Inc DR 1.40 %

Total Securities 466Avg. Market Cap $54,014 MillionP/E 24.23P/B 4.67Div. Yield 2.15%

0.0% 50.0% 100.0% 150.0%

Convertibles

Other

Cash

Fixed Income

Equities

0.0%

0.2%

0.4%

11.1%

88.3%

Japan 13.67 %United Kingdom 12.80 %United States 9.73 %France 7.45 %India 7.04 %

3 Years 5 Yearsvs. MSCI EAFE Growth Index (Net)Beta 0.87 0.93

American Funds EuPc MSCI EAFE Growth Index (Net)

0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 16.0 20.0 24.0




FinancialsEnergy


Other

American Funds EuPc MSCI EAFE Growth Index (Net)

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0

OtherFrontier Markets

Middle EastUnited Kingdom

Europe ex UKJapan

Pacific ex JapanEM Mid East+Africa

North AmericaEM Latin America

EM EuropeEM Asia



Cap

italiz

atio

n

Manager Style

MSCI EAFE Growth Index

MSCI Emerging Markets IndexMSCI EAFE Small Cap

MSCI EAFE Value Index

American Funds EuPc

50.0

75.0

100.0

125.0

150.0

Up

Cap

ture

50.0 70.0 90.0 110.0 130.0 150.0Down Capture

American Funds EuPc 12/31/15


FUND INFORMATION


PEER GROUP ANALYSIS - IM U.S. Broad Market Core Fixed Income (MF)




Firm and Management:Three of the fund’s portfolio managershave worked together for more thantwo decades. Steve Kane, CFA, LairdLandmann, and Tad Rivelle managedportfolios together at Hotchkis & Wileyin the early 1990s (Landmann andRivelle co-directed the fixed-incomedepartment there) before leaving tofound MetWest in 1996. Before that,the trio worked together at PIMCO.Bryan Whalen, CFA, joined MetWest in2004 and is a Generalist PortflioManager in the U.S. Fixed IncomeGroup.

Investment Strategy:The core tenant of MetWest’s fixedincome philosophy is a disciplinedimplementation of their value-basedprocess. The “value” concept is thatregardless of factor (duration, yieldcurve, sector selection, or issue) thestrategic decisions, and buy and selldecisions should be determined bywhether the factor or security is cheapor rich to fair value. Further, theirinvestment approach is designed totake advantage of the fact that fixedincome pricing is extremely volatile inthe short run, but over the long term thepricing risks tend to mean revert.Hence, they tend to only overweightinterest rates, yield curve, credit /spread risk when prices move out ofline with the long term fundamentals.

Innovest Assessment:The fund is expected to outperformwhen its sector allocation and securityselection in undervalued or undersponsored assets move towardmanagement’s view of intrinsic value.The strategy will underperform whenmarket psychology and investorsentiment cause temporary dislocationsleading to mispriced securities. Theseshort-term disruptions should lead tolong-term opportunities.

-4.0

-1.0

2.0

5.0

8.0

11.0

Ret

urn

LastQuarter

YearTo Date

1Year

3Years

5Years

7Years

10Years

Met West:Total Return;I -0.40 (17) 0.29 (36) 0.29 (36) 2.22 (4) 4.69 (2) 7.39 (3) 6.38 (1)

BC Aggregate Idx -0.57 (37) 0.55 (20) 0.55 (20) 1.44 (26) 3.25 (44) 4.09 (80) 4.52 (33)

Median -0.64 0.01 0.01 1.10 3.14 5.12 4.26

-1.5

0.0

1.5

3.0

4.5

6.0

Ret

urn

(%)

0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4 3.0 3.6 4.2Risk (Standard Deviation %)


Met West:Total Return;I 4.69 2.69

BC Aggregate Idx 3.25 2.68

Median 3.14 2.76

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008Met West:Total Return;I 5.99 (26) 0.50 (3) 11.55 (1) 5.52 (81) 11.66 (2) 17.30 (17) -1.27 (40)Barclays Aggregate Index 5.97 (27) -2.02 (54) 4.21 (80) 7.84 (11) 6.54 (69) 5.93 (90) 5.24 (11)IM U.S. Broad Market Core Fixed Income (MF) Median 5.54 -1.96 6.00 6.68 7.22 12.12 -3.43

3Years

EndingDec-2015

3Years

EndingDec-2014

3Years

EndingDec-2013

3Years

EndingDec-2012

3Years

EndingDec-2011

3Years

EndingDec-2010

3Years

EndingDec-2009

Met West:Total Return;I 2.22 (4) 5.92 (1) 5.76 (1) 9.54 (1) 11.39 (11) 8.95 (1) 7.23 (3)Barclays Aggregate Index 1.44 (26) 2.66 (67) 3.26 (60) 6.19 (67) 6.77 (82) 5.90 (48) 6.04 (25)IM U.S. Broad Market Core Fixed Income (MF) Median 1.10 3.08 3.47 6.69 8.78 5.79 5.15

Met West:Total Return;I 12/31/15


TOP SECTOR ALLOCATIONSPORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS

STYLE MAP (04/01/00 - 12/31/15)

QUALITY ALLOCATION

ASSET ALLOCATION

MATURITY DISTRIBUTION

UP/DOWN CAPTURE (01/01/11 - 12/31/15)

GNMA and Other Mtg Backed 40.81 %Government Agency Securities 28.76 %Corporate Notes/Bonds 19.08 %Asset Backed Securities 8.21 %

Avg. Coupon 2.49 %Nominal Maturity 7.84 YearsEffective Maturity N/ADuration 4.81 YearsSEC 30 Day Yield 3.85Avg. Credit Quality AA

0.0% 50.0% 100.0% 150.0%

Convertibles

Equities

Other

Cash

Fixed Income

0.0%

0.0%

0.9%

2.2%

96.9%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Not RatedD Rated

Equities/OtherBB AND B Rated

CCC, CC AND C rated

AA RatedBBB Rated

A RatedGovernment/AAA

0.2%

0.2%

0.9%

2.5%

3.4%

3.9%

8.8%

10.6%

69.6%

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0%

>30Yrs

Other

<1Yr

10-20Yrs

20-30Yrs

3-5Yrs

1-3Yrs

5-10Yrs

0.0%

0.9%

6.9%

7.9%

9.3%

16.1%

19.4%

39.5%



Cap

italiz

atio

n

Manager Style

Barclays Capital Long Term Govt Bond

Barclays Capital Long U.S. CreditBarclays Capital U.S. Credit 1-5 Year Index

Barclays Capital 1-5 Yr Gov

Met West:Total Return;I

50.0

75.0

100.0

125.0

150.0U

p C

aptu

re

50.0 70.0 90.0 110.0 130.0 150.0Down Capture

Met West:Total Return;I 12/31/15


FUND INFORMATION


PEER GROUP ANALYSIS - IM U.S. High Yield Bonds (MF)




Firm and Management:William J. Morgan joined J.P. Morgan in2005. He is the high yield team leaderand the portfolio manager for allaccounts in the high yield, aggressiveincome high yield, and insurance asset"BB' default rating styles. He is amember of the High Yield ManagementReview Committee and is alsoresponsible for managing the HighYield Team's credit analysts. Prior tojoining the firm, he held the same roleat Banc One High Yield Partners, LLCand Pacholder Associates, Inc.

Investment Style:The team utilizes a flexible approachthat seeks to generate excess return byutilizing the full range of opportunitiespresented by the high yield market,from investment grade credits trading athigh yield spreads to distressed anddefaulted securities and post-reorganization debt securities.

Innovest's Assessment:The JPMorgan High Yield Fund hashistorically had an overweight allocationto BB and B-rated credits; therefore it islikely to underperform in markets wherelower-rated high yield credits (CCC andlower) perform well. The strategy islikely to outperform when higher qualityhigh yield credits are in favor or wheninvestors generally favor less riskyassets. Additionally, the strategy shouldperform well in market environmentswhere bottom-up fundamental creditresearch is rewarded.

-16.0

-10.0

-4.0

2.0

8.0

14.0

20.0

Ret

urn

LastQuarter

YearTo Date

1Year

3Years

5Years

7Years

10Years

JPMorgan High Yield -2.03 (61) -4.54 (59) -4.54 (59) 1.58 (43) 4.31 (47) 11.20 (41) 6.50 (15)

BC US Corp: High Yield -2.07 (62) -4.47 (59) -4.47 (59) 1.69 (39) 5.04 (19) 12.84 (7) 6.96 (6)

Median -1.80 -3.96 -3.96 1.36 4.19 10.94 5.62

0.0

1.5

3.0

4.5

6.0

7.5

Ret

urn

(%)

-3.0 0.0 3.0 6.0 9.0 12.0Risk (Standard Deviation %)


JPMorgan High Yield 4.31 6.01

BC US Corp: High Yield 5.04 6.20

Median 4.19 6.16

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008JPMorgan High Yield 2.67 (19) 6.94 (42) 14.81 (49) 2.65 (63) 14.67 (36) 48.45 (46) -22.54 (30)Barclays US Corp: High Yield 2.45 (23) 7.44 (30) 15.81 (29) 4.98 (16) 15.12 (28) 58.21 (11) -26.16 (59)IM U.S. High Yield Bonds (MF) Median 1.47 6.61 14.72 3.31 14.05 47.61 -24.98

3Years

EndingDec-2015

3Years

EndingDec-2014

3Years

EndingDec-2013

3Years

EndingDec-2012

3Years

EndingDec-2011

3Years

EndingDec-2010

3Years

EndingDec-2009

JPMorgan High Yield 1.58 (43) 8.02 (34) 8.02 (53) 10.56 (51) 20.45 (47) 9.66 (10) 5.52 (13)Barclays US Corp: High Yield 1.69 (39) 8.43 (22) 9.32 (10) 11.86 (9) 24.12 (5) 10.38 (6) 5.98 (8)IM U.S. High Yield Bonds (MF) Median 1.36 7.50 8.07 10.56 20.23 7.60 3.71

JPMorgan High Yield 12/31/15



STYLE MAP (12/01/98 - 12/31/15)

QUALITY ALLOCATION

ASSET ALLOCATION


UP/DOWN CAPTURE (01/01/11 - 12/31/15)

Corporate Notes/Bonds 78.34 %US$ Denominated Fgn. Gvt. 16.91 %Preferred Stock-Non Convertible 0.88 %Common Stock 0.19 %Convertible Securities 0.18 %Asset Backed Securities 0.04 %

Avg. Coupon N/ANominal Maturity N/AEffective Maturity 6.85 YearsDuration N/ASEC 30 Day Yield 7.26Avg. Credit Quality BB

0.0% 50.0% 100.0% 150.0%

Other

Convertibles

Equities

Cash

Fixed Income

0.0%

0.2%

0.2%

3.5%

96.2%

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0%

A Rated

Equities/Other

Not Rated

BBB Rated

Government/AAA

CCC, CC AND C rated

BB AND B Rated

0.2%

1.1%

2.0%

3.1%

3.5%

11.7%

78.5%

0.0% 15.0% 30.0% 45.0% 60.0% 75.0% 90.0%

20-30Yrs

10-20Yrs

1-3Yrs

Other

<1Yr

>30Yrs

3-5Yrs

5-10Yrs

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

1.1%

3.5%

4.9%

28.5%

62.0%



Cap

italiz

atio

n

Manager Style




JPMorgan High Yield

50.0

75.0

100.0

125.0

150.0U

p C

aptu

re

50.0 70.0 90.0 110.0 130.0 150.0Down Capture

JPMorgan High Yield 12/31/15


FUND INFORMATION


PEER GROUP ANALYSIS - Loan Participation Mutual Funds




Firm and Management:Scott Page and Craig Russ co-managethe fund. Page has been its comanagersince its inception in early 2001. Russjoined him when Payson Swaffield wasappointed as Eaton Vance's chiefincome investment officer in November2007. Russ isn't a novice, though: Hesigned on with the firm in 1997 and hasserved as a bank-loan analyst and as acomanager on Eaton Vance funds suchas closed-end Senior Floating RateEFR since 2003.

Investment Strategy:The Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fundinvests in senior, secured floating-ratebank loans, the majority of which earnjunk-like credit ratings. It is a bottom-upstrategy that is focused on capitalpreservation and giving shareholderslow volatility exposure to the floatingrate corporate loan asset class. Due tothe sheer size of the strategy,incremental gains from inaccuratelyrated credits are not significant enoughto generate meaningful Alpha so theteam focuses on only the largest issuesof the highest rated credits availableand leaves the "diamond in the rough"finds to smaller, more nimblestrategies.

Innovest's Assessment:The strategy should be expected tooutperform during more difficult creditenvironments where higher quality,broad portfolio diversification tactics willprotect the portfolio from widespreadcredit deterioration. The strategyshould underperform when lowerquality credits lead (B- and lower) andin situations when strongerperformance is being derived fromsmaller issues.

-8.0

-4.0

0.0

4.0

8.0

12.0

16.0

Ret

urn

LastQuarter

YearTo Date

1Year

3Years

5Years

7Years

10Years

Eaton Vance Flt Rt -2.26 (56) -1.63 (53) -1.63 (53) 1.24 (41) 2.85 (39) 9.16 (22) 3.42 (19)

CSFB Leveraged Loan Idx -1.97 (37) -0.39 (22) -0.39 (22) 2.58 (2) 3.75 (4) 9.73 (12) 4.08 (1)

Median -2.19 -1.53 -1.53 0.99 2.57 8.46 2.99

0.0

0.9

1.8

2.7

3.6

4.5

Ret

urn

(%)

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0Risk (Standard Deviation %)


Eaton Vance Flt Rt 2.85 2.96

CSFB Leveraged Loan Idx 3.75 3.11

Median 2.57 3.43

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008Eaton Vance Flt Rt 0.63 (29) 4.82 (51) 8.27 (67) 2.44 (9) 9.55 (43) 46.49 (21) -30.25 (60)Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index 2.06 (1) 6.15 (4) 9.42 (33) 1.80 (29) 9.97 (39) 44.88 (27) -28.75 (46)Loan Participation Mutual Funds Median 0.25 4.86 8.89 1.43 9.17 41.50 -29.64

3Years

EndingDec-2015

3Years

EndingDec-2014

3Years

EndingDec-2013

3Years

EndingDec-2012

3Years

EndingDec-2011

3Years

EndingDec-2010

3Years

EndingDec-2009

Eaton Vance Flt Rt 1.24 (41) 4.53 (52) 5.15 (43) 6.71 (36) 18.02 (17) 3.83 (38) 1.39 (19)Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index 2.58 (2) 5.84 (3) 5.74 (13) 6.99 (27) 17.49 (30) 4.31 (21) 1.69 (16)Loan Participation Mutual Funds Median 0.99 4.54 5.00 6.45 16.28 3.38 0.42

Eaton Vance Flt Rt 12/31/15



STYLE MAP (02/01/01 - 12/31/15)

QUALITY ALLOCATION

ASSET ALLOCATION


UP/DOWN CAPTURE (01/01/11 - 12/31/15)

Corporate Notes/Bonds 96.72 %Avg. Coupon 4.63 %Nominal Maturity N/AEffective Maturity 4.68 YearsDuration 0.33 YearsSEC 30 Day Yield 3.84Avg. Credit Quality BB

0.0% 50.0% 100.0% 150.0%

Convertibles

Equities

Other

Cash

Fixed Income

0.0%

0.0%

1.2%

2.1%

96.7%

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 125.0%

D Rated

Equities/Other

CCC, CC AND C rated

Government/AAA

Not Rated

BBB Rated

BB AND B Rated

0.6%

1.2%

1.9%

2.1%

2.8%

3.8%

87.6%

0.0% 15.0% 30.0% 45.0% 60.0%

>30Yrs

20-30Yrs

10-20Yrs

Other

<1Yr

1-3Yrs

5-10Yrs

3-5Yrs

0.0%

0.0%

0.2%

1.2%

2.3%

11.6%

39.1%

45.7%



Cap

italiz

atio

n

Manager Style




Eaton Vance Flt Rt

50.0

75.0

100.0

125.0

150.0U

p C

aptu

re

50.0 70.0 90.0 110.0 130.0 150.0Down Capture

Eaton Vance Flt Rt 12/31/15




FUND INFORMATION

INDEX ALLOCATION

PERFORMANCE OVER TIME

INVESTMENT STATISTICS (5 YEARS*)


*If less than 5 years, since inception time period was used.

Firm and Management:Credit Suisse Asset Management offersa wide range of investment productsand functions across asset classes andinvestment styles. This divisionoversees global and regional portfolios,mutual funds, and other investmentvehicles for governments, institutions,corporations and individuals worldwide.The Commodities PortfolioManagement Team is led by NelsonLouie, Global Head of Commodities,and Christopher Burton, SeniorPortfolio Manager. Nelson Louie andChristopher Burton are ultimatelyresponsible for managing allcomponents of the Enhanced TotalCommodity Return Strategy.

Investment Strategy:The fund uses a wholly-ownedsubsidiary to invest in derivatives thatprovide exposure to the BloombergCommodity Index. It primarily usesswaps but can also hold futures andstructured notes. The goal is to trackthe benchmark without much trackingerror. Management tries to modestlyoutpace the benchmark by pickingfavorably priced spots on commodityfutures curves and employing low-riskcash management.

Innovest Assessment:The Credit Suisse Commodity ReturnStrategy seeks to track the BloombergCommodity index through enhancedreplication and trade optimization,creating marginal long-termoutperformance. The diversified natureof the Bloomberg Commodity indexshould also dictate performance,causing relative outperformance(underperformance) when energy lags(leads) other commodity sectors.Investors may also experience marginalunderperformance when short-termcommodity contracts, exhibitingnegative carry, outpace longer maturitycontracts.

Crdt Suis Comm Rtn Strat Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return

-36.0

-30.0

-24.0

-18.0

-12.0

-6.0

0.0

Ret

urn

(%)

LastQuarter

2015 1Year

3Years

5Years

7Years

10Years

-10.5

-24.7 -24.7

-17.3

-13.5

-5.5 -6.4

-10.3

-25.0 -25.0

-17.5

-13.5

-5.4-6.5

Crdt Suis Comm Rtn Strat

Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return

-13.6

-13.5

-13.4

Ret

urn

(%)


LastQuarter 2015 1

Year3

Years5

Years7

Years10

YearsCrdt Suis Comm Rtn Strat -10.34 -24.96 -24.96 -17.49 -13.52 -5.38 -6.46Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return -10.52 -24.66 -24.66 -17.29 -13.47 -5.48 -6.43

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005Crdt Suis Comm Rtn Strat -16.87 -9.96 -1.83 -12.29 16.93 20.12 -35.47 14.78 1.92 20.31Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return -17.01 -9.52 -1.06 -13.32 16.83 18.91 -35.65 16.23 2.07 21.36

Alpha Beta ActualCorrelation

UpMarketCapture

DownMarketCapture

InceptionDate

Crdt Suis Comm Rtn Strat -0.41 0.98 1.00 96.89 98.83 01/01/2006Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 0.00 1.00 1.00 100.00 100.00 01/01/2006

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

Industr

ia l M et

a ls

Energy

Gr ains

L iv esto

ck

Precious

M eta ls

So fts

15.5

32.630.5

4.8

16.6

0.0

Crdt Suis Comm Rtn Strat 12/31/15


FUND INFORMATION


PEER GROUP ANALYSIS - IM U.S. GIC/Stable Value (SA+CF)




Investment StrategyThe PLUS Fund's investment strategiesare based on a structured anddiversified multi-product, multi-managerapproach. The PLUS Fund investsprimarily in a diversified portfolio ofstable value investment contracts andfixed income securities that backcertain stable value investmentcontracts. Cash equivalents are held, inpart, to provide liquidity for payouts.The composition of the PLUS Fundportfolio and its allocations to variousstable value investments and fixedincome investment sectors isdetermined based on prevailingeconomic and capital marketconditions, relative value analysis, andother factors.

-1.0

-0.1

0.8

1.7

2.6

3.5

4.4

5.3

Ret

urn

LastQuarter

YearTo Date

1Year

3Years

5Years

7Years

10Years

Vantage Trust Plus 0.57 (1) 2.34 (1) 2.34 (1) 2.44 (1) 2.77 (1) 3.12 (7) 3.72 (4)

Ryan 3 Yr GIC Mstr 0.31 (76) 1.16 (94) 1.16 (94) 1.09 (96) 1.43 (95) 2.16 (69) 2.82 (88)

Median 0.46 1.81 1.81 1.68 2.15 2.43 3.07

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

Ret

urn

(%)



Vantage Trust Plus 2.77 0.22

Ryan 3 Yr GIC Mstr 1.43 0.27

Median 2.15 0.24

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008Vantage Trust Plus 2.39 (3) 2.59 (1) 3.03 (8) 3.50 (21) 3.85 (32) 4.16 (22) 5.14 (4)Ryan 3 Yr GIC Mstr 1.03 (95) 1.06 (92) 1.48 (99) 2.44 (62) 3.53 (43) 4.49 (11) 4.79 (29)IM U.S. GIC/Stable Value (SA+CF) Median 1.70 1.73 2.39 2.91 3.39 3.63 4.65

3Years

EndingDec-2015

3Years

EndingDec-2014

3Years

EndingDec-2013

3Years

EndingDec-2012

3Years

EndingDec-2011

3Years

EndingDec-2010

3Years

EndingDec-2009

Vantage Trust Plus 2.44 (1) 2.67 (1) 3.04 (1) 3.46 (24) 3.84 (21) 4.38 (18) 4.83 (11)Ryan 3 Yr GIC Mstr 1.09 (96) 1.19 (100) 1.66 (97) 2.48 (79) 3.48 (35) 4.27 (21) 4.60 (24)IM U.S. GIC/Stable Value (SA+CF) Median 1.68 1.97 2.35 2.85 3.20 3.95 4.40

Vantage Trust Plus 12/31/15


Financial Strength:

Information as of 6/30/2015

AA‐

8.7%19.0%5.9%

14.0% A1

AaaA1A1

AA+A+A+

14.4% A1 AA‐

Vantage Trust PLUS

Investment Contract Issuers % of Wrapped Assets5.3%

S&P A+

Moody'sA1

New York Life Ins. Co. Pacific Life Ins. Co. Principal Life Ins. Co.

Transamerica Premier Life Ins. Co

Bank of Tokyo‐Mitsubishi

Prudential Ins. Co. of America

10.4%

8.0%

23.8%57.8%

Portfolio Allocation

Cash Buffer

Shorter Duration Focus

Ladder Maturity Focus

Total Return Focus

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Market‐to‐Book 99.88% 95.18% 99.74% 101.37% 102.42% 103.22% 100.60% 101.45% 100.20%

80.00%

85.00%

90.00%

95.00%

100.00%

105.00%

Historical Market‐to‐Book Values

Market‐to‐Book

Organization:Founded in 1972, ICMA‐RC's mission is to help building retirement security for public employees. ICMA Description:The PLUS Fund's investment strategies are based on a structured and diversified multi‐product, multi‐manager approach. The PLUS Fund invests primarily in a diversified portfolio of stable value investment contracts and fixed income securities that back certain stable value investment contracts. Cash equivalents are held, in part, to provide liquidity for payouts. The compostion of the PLUS fund and its allocations to vaious stable value investments and fixed income invesment sectors is determined based on prevailing economic and capital market condtions, relative value


A+AA‐A2

ICMA‐RC VantageTrust Retirement Income Advantage Fund

‐ Participants can choose between a single benefit option and a spousal benefit option.

‐ Single Benefit Option: participant will receive the annual lifetime withdrawal amount for the rest of his/her life, upon death remaining assets in the Fund will be distributed to beneficiaries.

Prudential Retirement Insurance & Annuity Company

‐ The promise that the participant will continue to receive income for life following retirement is only as good as the insurance company making the promise. Therefore, it is important to evaluate and monitor the financial viability of the insurance company.

‐ Spousal Benefit Option: Participant will receive annual lifetime withdrawal amount for rest of his/her life and, upon participant's death, the surviving spouse will be entitled to the annual lifetime withdrawal amount for the rest of his/her life.

A t L k I Si l B fit S l B fit

Insurer RatingsA.M. Best

Standard and Poor'sM d '

Annual Lifetime Withdrawal Amounts:

2nd of 15 ratings ‐ superior2nd of 10 ratings ‐ very strong6th f 21 ti i

Organization:In 1972 the ICMA Retirement Corporation (ICMA‐RC) was established by the International City/County Management Association (ICMA). ICMA‐RC is an independent and non‐profit corporation that provides defined contribution plan administration, investment management and educational services to public sector employers and their employees.

Description: The primary objective of the VantageTrust Retirement IncomeAdvantage Fund is to provide a guaranteed lifetime income feature to participants. This fund is also known as a guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit (GMWB). The GMWB feature is similar to an insurance policy where participants pay a fee to an insurance company in exchange for the insurance company's promise to pay the participant a guaranteed benefit throughout retirement equal to a percentage of the participant's account balance, typically calculated as the total of their contributions plus any market appreciation as of a specified date such as the participant’s date of birth or investment anniversary. The primary purpose of GMWB features is to provide participants with a minimum guaranteed income for their lives, regardless of how their investments perform and regardless of fluctuations in the market value of their account. Every year, on the participant’s date of birth or investment anniversary, the current market value in the Fund is compared with the highest birthday or anniversary value on record for the participant's account, and the higher value will be used as the participant’s market value in which the lifetime annual withdrawal amount is calculated from. Once a participant begins to receive withdrawals, they will be entitled to withdraw their lifetime annual withdrawal amount for the rest of their life, regardless of their market value in the fund. The primary value of the GMWB is the insurance company's promise that the participant will continue to receive income for life following retirement, even if the participant's account balance is depleted.

A2

A+

0.72%

1.00%

1.72%

Information as of 3/31/2014

70 or older 5.75% 5.25%

Age at Lock‐In Single Benefit Spousal Benefit Moody's

4.50%

3.75%

5.00%

4.25%

65 ‐ 69

55 ‐ 64 Fitch

6th of 21 ratings ‐ superior

3rd of 9 ratings ‐ strong

Total annual cost assuming $100,000 balance:

$1,720

Underlying Investments

• A balanced fund serves as the VantageTrust Retirement IncomeAdvantage Fund's underlying investment. The underlying balanced fund is comprised of both actively and passively managed, proprietary mutual funds as well as an additional fixed income fund managed by Prudential.

Fees & Expenses: Underlying investment management fees:

Guarantee fee:

Total annual cost (%):

25%

20%

15%

10%

30%

Vantagepoint Broad Market Index*

Vantagepoint Growth & Income*

Vantagepoint International*

Vantagepoint Inflation Protected Securities* Prudential Core Conservative Intermediate Bond

* passively managed strategy


Passive Portfolios Weight (%)Jan-1985Barclays Aggregate Index 35.00MSCI EAFE (net) Index 15.00Russell 2000 Index 15.00S&P 500 Index 35.00

Jul-1990Barclays Aggregate Index 35.00MSCI EAFE (net) Index 15.00Russell 2000 Index 15.00S&P 500 Index 35.00

Apr-2001Barclays Aggregate Index 24.00MSCI EAFE (net) Index 15.00Russell 2000 Index 20.00S&P 500 Index 41.00

Jan-200270% S&P/30% BC Aggr 50.00MSCI EAFE (net) Index 15.00Russell 2000 Index 10.00Barclays Aggregate Index 15.00Russell Midcap Index 10.00

Apr-2002Barclays Aggregate Index 15.00MSCI EAFE (net) Index 15.00Russell 2000 Index 10.00Russell Midcap Index 10.0070% S&P/30% BC Aggr 50.00

Oct-2005Barclays Aggregate Index 15.00MSCI EAFE (net) Index 15.00Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 2.00Russell Midcap Index 7.00Russell 2000 Index 7.0070% S&P/30% BC Aggr 54.00

Passive Portfolios Weight (%)Jan-2006Barclays Aggregate Index 13.50MSCI EAFE (net) Index 15.00Russell Midcap Index 7.00Russell 2000 Index 7.00Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 3.5070% S&P/30% BC Aggr 54.00

Apr-2006Barclays Aggregate Index 12.00MSCI EAFE (net) Index 15.00Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 5.00Russell Midcap Index 7.00Russell 2000 Index 7.0070% S&P/30% BC Aggr 54.00

Oct-200770% S&P/30% BC Aggr 54.00Russell Midcap Index 7.00Russell 2000 Index 7.00MSCI EAFE (net) Index 15.00Barclays Aggregate Index 12.00Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 5.00

Apr-201070% S&P/30% BC Aggr 52.00Russell Midcap Index 7.00Russell 2000 Index 7.00MSCI EAFE (net) Index 15.00Barclays Aggregate Index 4.00Barclays US Corp: High Yield 3.00CSFB Leveraged Loan 7.00Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 5.00

Apr-201270% S&P/30% BC Aggr 52.00Russell Midcap Index 7.00Russell 2000 Index 7.00MSCI EAFE (net) Index 15.00Barclays Aggregate Index 4.00Barclays US Corp: High Yield 5.00CSFB Leveraged Loan 5.00Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 5.00

Custom Benchmark Allocations Over Time


Custom Benchmark Allocations Over TimePassive Portfolios Weight (%)Sep-201470% S&P/30% BC Aggr 50.00Russell Midcap Index 6.50Russell 2000 Index 6.50MSCI EAFE (net) Index 19.00Barclays Aggregate Index 4.00Barclays US Corp: High Yield 2.00CSFB Leveraged Loan 7.00Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 5.00


GlossaryAlpha measures a portfolio’s return in excess of the market return adjusted for risk. It is a measure of the manager’s contribution to performance with reference to security selection. A positive alpha indicates that a portfolio was positively rewarded for the residual risk that was taken for that level of market exposure.

Beta measures the sensitivity of rates of portfolio return to movements in the market. A portfolio’s beta measures the expected change in return per 1% change in the return on the market. If the beta of a portfolio is 1.5, a 1 percent increase in the return of the market will result, on average, in a 1.5 percent increase in the return on the portfolio. The converse would also be true.

Dividend Yield - The total amount of dividends paid out for a stock over the preceding twelve months divided by the closing price of a share of the common stock.

Down Capture Ratio - The Down Capture Ratio is a measure of the Investment’s compound return when the Benchmark was down divided by the Benchmark’s compound return when the Benchmark was down. The smaller the value, the better.

Duration - A time measure of a bond’s interest-rate sensitivity, based on the weighted average of the time periods over which a bond’s cash flows accrue to the bondholder.

Forecasted Long-Term Earnings Growth - This growth rate is a measure of a company’s expected long-term success in generating future year-over-year earnings growth. This growth rate is a market value weighted average of the consensus (mean) analysts’ long-term earnings growth rate forecast for each company in the portfolio. The definition of long-term varies by analyst but is limited to a 3-8 year range. This value is expressed as the expected average annual growth of earnings in percent.

Information Ratio measures the excess return per unit of residual “non market” risk in a portfolio. The ratio is equal to the Alpha divided by the Residual Risk.

Market Capitalization - The market value of a company’s outstanding shares of common stock at a specific point in time, computed as the product of the number of outstanding shares times the stock’s closing price per share.

P/E ratio relates the price of the stock to the per-share earnings of the company. A high P/E generally indicates that the market will pay more to obtain the company because it has confidence in the company’s ability to increase its earnings. Conversely, a low P/E indicates that the market has less confidence that the company’s earnings will increase, and therefore will not pay as much for its stock. In most cases a fund with a high average P/E ratio has paid a premium for stocks that have a high potential for increased earnings. If the fund’s average P/E ratio is low, the manager may believe that the stocks have an overlooked or undervalued potential for appreciation.

P/B ratio of a company relates the per-share market price of the company’s stock to its per-share book value, the historical accounting value of the company’s tangible assets. A high P/B ratio indicates that the price of the stock exceeds the actual worth of the company’s assets. A low P/B ratio would indicate that the stock is a bargain, priced below what the company’s assets could be worth if liquidated.

P/CF ratio compares the total market value of the portfolio to the portfolio’s share of the underlying stocks’ earnings (or book value, cash flow, sales or dividends).

Alpha measures a portfolio’s return in excess of the market return adjusted for risk. It is a measure of the manager’s contribution to performance with reference to security selection. A positive alpha indicates that a portfolio was positively rewarded for the residual risk that was taken for that level of market exposure.











R-Squared indicates the extent to which the variability of the portfolio returns is explained by market action. It can also be thought of as measuring the diversification relative to the appropriate benchmark. An R-Squared value of .75 indicates that 75% of the fluctuation in a portfolio return is explained by market action. An R-Squared of 1.0 indicates that a portfolio’s returns are entirely related to the market and it is not influenced by other factors. An R-Squared of zero indicates that no relationship exists between the portfolio’s return and the market.

Residual Risk is the unsystematic risk of a fund, or the portion of the total risk unique to the manager and not related to the overall market. This reflects the “bets” which the manager places in that particular asset class. These bets reflect emphasis in particular sectors, maturities (for bonds), or other issue specific factors which the manager considers a good investment opportunity. Diversification of the portfolio will reduce the residual risk of that portfolio.

Sharpe Ratio is a measure of risk-adjusted return. It is calculated by subtracting the risk-free return (90 day T-Bills) from the portfolio return and dividing the resulting “excess return” by the portfolio’s total risk level (standard deviation). The result is a measure of returned gained per unit of total risk taken.

Standard Deviation is a statistical measure of portfolio risk. It reflects the average deviation of observations from their sample mean. Standard Deviation is used as an estimate of risk since it measures how wide the range of returns typically is. The wider the typical range of returns, the higher the standard deviation of returns, and the higher the portfolio risk. If returns are normally distributed (i.e. as a bell shaped curve distribution) then approximately 66% of 2/3 of the returns would occur within plus or minus one standard deviation of the sample mean.

Style Exposure Chart indicates a portfolio’s exposure to a particular capitalization (large, medium or small) and style (value or growth). Based on Sharpe’s return based style analysis, a style map will attempt to correlate a manager to a particular style of investing (i.e. Large Cap Growth).

Turnover Ratio - This is a measure of the fund’s trading activity which is computed by taking the lesser of purchases or sales (excluding all securities with maturities of less than one year) and dividing by average monthly net assets.

Up Capture Ratio - The Up Capture Ratio is a measure of the Investment’s compound return when the Benchmark was up divided by the Benchmark’s compound return when the Benchmark was up. The greater the value, the better.


Alpha measures a portfolio’s return in excess of the market return adjusted for risk. It is a measure of the manager’s contribution to performance with reference to security selection. A positive alpha indicates that a portfolio was positively rewarded for the residual risk that was taken for that level of market exposure.











R-Squared indicates the extent to which the variability of the portfolio returns is explained by market action. It can also be thought of as measuring the diversification relative to the appropriate benchmark. An R-Squared value of .75 indicates that 75% of the fluctuation in a portfolio return is explained by market action. An R-Squared of 1.0 indicates that a portfolio’s returns are entirely related to the market and it is not influenced by other factors. An R-Squared of zero indicates that no relationship exists between the portfolio’s return and the market.

Residual Risk is the unsystematic risk of a fund, or the portion of the total risk unique to the manager and not related to the overall market. This reflects the “bets” which the manager places in that particular asset class. These bets reflect emphasis in particular sectors, maturities (for bonds), or other issue specific factors which the manager considers a good investment opportunity. Diversification of the portfolio will reduce the residual risk of that portfolio.

Sharpe Ratio is a measure of risk-adjusted return. It is calculated by subtracting the risk-free return (90 day T-Bills) from the portfolio return and dividing the resulting “excess return” by the portfolio’s total risk level (standard deviation). The result is a measure of returned gained per unit of total risk taken.

Standard Deviation is a statistical measure of portfolio risk. It reflects the average deviation of observations from their sample mean. Standard Deviation is used as an estimate of risk since it measures how wide the range of returns typically is. The wider the typical range of returns, the higher the standard deviation of returns, and the higher the portfolio risk. If returns are normally distributed (i.e. as a bell shaped curve distribution) then approximately 66% of 2/3 of the returns would occur within plus or minus one standard deviation of the sample mean.

Style Exposure Chart indicates a portfolio’s exposure to a particular capitalization (large, medium or small) and style (value or growth). Based on Sharpe’s return based style analysis, a style map will attempt to correlate a manager to a particular style of investing (i.e. Large Cap Growth).

Turnover Ratio - This is a measure of the fund’s trading activity which is computed by taking the lesser of purchases or sales (excluding all securities with maturities of less than one year) and dividing by average monthly net assets.

Up Capture Ratio - The Up Capture Ratio is a measure of the Investment’s compound return when the Benchmark was up divided by the Benchmark’s compound return when the Benchmark was up. The greater the value, the better.



Organization Asset BasePct. Owned by Employees CurrentBoutique vs. Institutional Growth of AUMRecent Changes in Ownership Capacity ConstraintsManagement Investment in Firm’s Products Soft ClosedSpecialized vs. All in One Re-opening of Products

People PerformanceSize of Team Short Term vs. Benchmark and Style GroupStructure of Team Long Term vs. Benchmark and Style GroupExperience of Team Consistency – Relative/Absolute/Risk AdjustedTurnover of Key MembersGrowth of Team with Assets

Philosophy/Process ExpensesStyle Consistency (Growth/Value, Market Cap) Cost vs. CompetitorsDomestic/Int’l drift

Examples of things that would cause concern resulting in a YELLOW or RED box include but not limited to:

6) EXPENSES - A fund or product that is substantially above the median expense ratio or management fee would be a cause for concern.

Fund Analysis Overview Key

1) ORGANIZATION - A change in ownership whereby it is unclear what the structure of the new organization will be, how will key personnel be compensated, and what type of employment contracts are in place to keep key decision makers.

2) PEOPLE - A change in portfolio manager would be a cause for concern. We would assess the new talent taking over. Is the new portfolio manager a current member of the team or is it someone new from outside the group or organization.

3) PHILOSOPHY/PROCESS - A change in portfolio characteristics would be a cause for concern. For example, if a growth style manager suddenly starts investing in value names during a value rally or if a small cap portfolio was migrating into midcap names due to asset growth.

4) ASSET BASE - A small cap fund with more than $3 billion in assets would be a cause for concern or a fund that continues to add assets as it becomes clear the portfolio management team can not handle the inflows. A sign of this would be a large increase in the cash position of the portfolio.

5) PERFORMANCE - A product that fails to outperform either the index and/or the median manager on a consistent basis (at least 50% of the time) would be a cause for concern. Short term and long term performance is considered both on an absolute basis and relative basis in addition to risk-adjusted measures.

Each of the 6 criteria are evaluated on an individual basis and subjective based on Innovest’s assessment. Below are examples of the many factors under each category we consider when making an assessment.


Holdings Based Attribution Key

A. Buy and Hold Portfolio – Return for the portfolio assuming no securities were traded during the quarter B. Portfolio Trading = (C – A) or (Actual Return ‐ Buy and Hold Portfolio) C. Actual Return – return the client experienced D. Benchmark Return – return for benchmark E. Actual Active Return – (C – D) or ( Actual Return minus Benchmark Return ) F. Stock Selection – Is the contribution to return based upon the active stock selection by the manager with in a sector compared to the benchmark. G. Sector Selection – Is the contribution to return based upon the active overweight or underweight of a sector compared to the benchmark by the

manager. H. Interaction – Is the impact of contribution to return that are a combination of both Stock and Security selection also sometimes referred to as the

unexplained. I. Total Selection – Is the Sum of all the selection affects (F,G,H) J. Portfolio Trading – Same as B. K. Benchmark Trading – Benchmark B/H return – Actual Benchmark Return L. Total Trading – Portfolio Trading plus Benchmark Trading M. Buy & Hold Active Return – I + L


Disclaimer The preceding statistical analysis was prepared by Innovest Portfolio Solutions LLC with data provided by Investment Metrics (IM), Lipper and Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The investment products discussed are not insured by the FDIC and involve investment risk including the possible loss of all principal. The information contained herein: (1) is proprieta ry to the v endors listed above and/or its content providers; (2) may not be c opied or distributed; and (3) is not w arranted to be accurate, complete or timely. None of the vendors nor its content providers are respons ible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Innovest compiles the information utilizing secondary data from statements provided by the plan trustee and/or custodian/ This report may also contain returns and valuations from outside sources as directed b y the client. Innovest assumes no respons ibility for the accuracy of these valuations or return methodologies. Reasonable care has been take n to assure the accuracy of the computer software and databases. Innovest disclaims responsibility, financial or ot herwise for t he accuracy and completeness of this report. Copyright 2015 by Innovest Portfolio Solutions LLC Inc. Note: Actual client mutual fund returns are reflected on the table of returns page. Fund pages subsequent to the table of returns reflect the representative mutual fund with the longest track record and may not be the actual share class held by the client. “Copyright 2015, Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC. Reproduction of S&P Index Services in any form is prohibited except with the prior written permission of S&P. S&P does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, completeness or availability of any information and is not responsible for an y errors or omissions, regardless of the cause or for the r esults obtained from the use of such information. S&P DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PAR TICULAR PURPOSE OR USE. In no event shall S&P be liable f or any direct, indirect, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including lost income or lost profit and opportunity costs) in connection with subscriber’s or others’ use of S&P Index Services (2015) Copyright MSCI 2015. Unpublished. All Rights R eserved. This information may only be used for your internal use, may not be reproduced or re-disseminated in any form and m ay not be used to create any financial instruments or products or an y indices. This information is provided on an “as is” basis and the user of this informa tion assumes the entire risk of any use it ma y make or permit t o be made of thi s information. Neither MSCI, an y or its affiliates o r any other person involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating this information makes any express or implied warranties or representations with respect to such information or the results to be ob tained by the use thereof, and MSCI, its affiliates and each such other person hereby expressly disclaim all warr anties (including, without limitation, all warranties of o riginality, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, non-infringement, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose) with respect to this information. Without lim iting any of the foregoing, in no ev ent shall MSCI, any of its affiliat es or any other person involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating this information have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, punit ive, consequential or an y other damages (including, without limitation, lost profits) even if notified of, or if it might otherwise have anticipated, the possibility of such damages.


It’s a Brand New

Year - M

ake Your Retirement

Plan a ResolutionD

id you know that on average, 45%

of Am

ericans m

ake New

Year’s Resolutions each year but only 8%

actually keep them

? If you are a millennial, 24%

of you are likely to keep your resolutions as com

pared to 14%

of the over 50 generation. Interesting statistics from

the University of Scranton to ponder

as we close the book on 2015 and begin a fresh new

chapter titled 2016.

If you are one of the 45% w

ho make N

ew Year’s

resolutions, let’s take a different tack in 2016 and add a retirem

ent plan checkup to the list of old standbys like eating healthier, or joining a gym

. Let’s look at som

e financial resolutions that are easy to m

ake and even easier to keep.

Participate in your Retirem

ent Savings Plan – If your em

ployer’s plan is voluntary and you are not participating, w

hat are you w

aiting for? Tim

e is a valuable asset and the younger you are w

hen you start saving, the less you have to save to m

eet your retirement goals.

The pow

er of compounding really does m

atter.

You cannot afford to wait, so dip your toe in the

water, even if it is just 1%

of your pay, and start saving today.

Set Retirem

ent Goals – You need to consider

several factors in order to set your goals. D

oes longevity run in your family? W

ill your house be paid off at retirem

ent? Are

you eligible for Social Security? Do you

plan on working after retirem

ent? Some experts

think that you will need 70%

to 80% of your pre-

retirement incom

e to support you during your retirem

ent years. That num

ber may vary depending

on your spending goals. Do you plan on traveling

the world or sitting on your deck and w

atching the w

orld go by? Try using one of the online calculators to help project your incom

e needs in retirement. If

you have already set goals, good for you, but you w

ill need to hold yourself accountable by comparing

your actual balances with your projected needs on

an annual basis. No one has ever com

plained about saving too m

uch.

Save Your Raise – W

hen you receive an increase in pay consider increasing your salary deferral contribution percentage by a portion of your salary increase. You are used to living on your current paycheck, so you

won’t m

iss those extra dollars, making it an ideal

time to increase your retirem

ent savings rate. It is a fairly painless w

ay to increase the amount you save

in your retirement plan each year. If your provider

offers auto escalation, sign up and the increase will

happen automatically at the tim

e and amount you

set each year.

If the contribution rate in your employer

sponsored plan is fixed, consider making additional

contributions to any supplemental retirem

ent plans that m

ay be offered such as a 457 plan or an IRA

.

WIN

TE

R 2

01

6

1

C

ontinued on page 2

1

23

It’s a Brand New

Year - Make Your Retirem

ent Plan a ResolutionContinued from

cover

Take Advantage of the M

atch – If your em

ployer offers a matching contribution,

make sure you are contributing at least as

much as w

hat is being matched. If your

employer offers 25 cents on the dollar up to

3% of pay, m

ake sure you are contributing at least 3%

to take advantage of the full match, otherw

ise you are leaving m

oney on the table. If you can’t quite afford to contribute up to the m

atch, use the idea in resolution 3 to help you get there.

Recheck Your Investm

ent Allocations -

Year end is a good time to revisit your

investment m

ix to make sure that your

choices still make sense in helping you m

eet your retirem

ent goals. It is important

to remem

ber that as you age and your retirement

time horizon shortens, your investm

ent needs may

change accordingly. The sim

plest solution may be

choosing a target date fund. These funds take the

mystery out of diversification and autom

atically becom

e more conservative over tim

e. Risk based

portfolios are another option, but you will have to

remem

ber to move yourself into a m

ore conservative m

odel as you get closer to retirement. If you do

your own investing, be sure to review

your strategy annually. You w

ant to make sure your retirem

ent savings dollars are not exposed to m

ore risk than is appropriate for your age and tolerance.

Rebalance Your Portfolio – If you are

doing your own investing, you need to

maintain your target asset allocations in

your portfolio. Funds in various asset classes grow

at different rates over time due to

market changes, causing the allocations to be out

of balance. One of the keys to m

aintaining that

portfolio is to regularly rebalance your portfolio back to the original investm

ent allocations. The

primary objective of rebalancing is to help m

itigate risk. M

ost recordkeeping providers offer automatic

rebalancing, but you will need to select the option

and choose the frequency: quarterly, semi-annually

or annually. If your provider does not offer this service, set a tickler to rem

ind you to do it yourself, at least annually if not quarterly.

Check your Beneficiary D

esignations – Did

you get married, divorced, have a baby, lose

a loved one this year? Don’t forget to check

your beneficiary designation to make sure

you have listed the appropriate person to receive your retirem

ent account balance in the event of your death. M

any plans offer this service online through their recordkeeping provider or H

RIS

system. It only takes a few

minutes to m

ake sure your w

ishes will be honored.

As you m

ake your resolutions for 2016, try including som

e of these along with healthier eating

and exercise. Your future self will thank you for

making sure your w

ellness program included your

retirement plan!

2

Published by Innovest Portfolio Solutions4643 S. Ulster Street, Suite 1040 | Denver, CO

80237 | 303.694.1900 | ww

w.innovestinc.com

456

7

Whom

do I call for help?A

ccount Information

> Balances> > Change personal info

Contact : ICMA-RC

800.669.7400 | ww

w.icm

arc.org

The Plan’s Investment Consultant

Innovest Portfolio Solutions

4643 S. Ulster St., Suite 1040D

enver, CO 80237

303.694.1900 | ww

w.innovestinc.com

The pie chart and accompanying data show

n for each portfolio illustrates the percentage allocated to each fund.

How

is the portfolio diversified?

Investment perform

ance results shown above represent past perform

ance and are not indicative of future results. Please read the

information contained in the applicable fund prospectuses carefully before investing m

oney.

Past P

erformance

Risk Level:The am

ount of expected risk in the Portfolio. R

isk is measured by the potential loss over a 12-m

onth period that an investorm

ight expect in the Portfolio, and is calculated via a statistical process consistent w

ith 95% probability.

Moderate:-17.0%

to -19.0%

Expected Return: The level of expected investm

ent return from the P

ortfolio. The range of returns shown below

indicates the potentialgain that an investor m

ight expect each year, on average, over a 5-year period. This is also referred to as the "mean" return, and is

calculated using a statistical process to determine a range of probabilities.

Moderate:6.5%

to 8.5%

Who typically uses this portfolio?

Understanding Your Professionally-M

anaged Portfolios

Portfolio A

llocation (%)


The fund seeks the highest total return over

time consistent w

ith an emphasis on both

capital appreciation and income.

The fund pursues its objective by investing in

a diversified portfolio. Under norm

alconditions, the portfolio’s allocation to thebroad asset classes w

ill be within the

following ranges: stocks (50-70%

); bonds (20-40%

); and money m

arkets (0-20%).

Dom

estic stocks are drawn from

the overallU

.S. m

arket. International stocks areselected prim

arily from large com

panies indeveloped m

arkets but may also include

investments in em

erging markets. B

onds,w

hich can include foreign issues, areprim

arily investment grade (i.e., assigned

one of the four highest credit ratings) and arechosen across the entire governm

ent,corporate, and asset- and m

ortgage-backedbond m

arkets. Maturities reflect the

manager’s outlook for interest rates.

Past P

erformance (%

)*

Expense R

atio:0.68%

Decem

ber 31, 2015 : $110,986,269

Boston Trust E

quity - Boulder F&

P39.76

Victory M

under Mid C

ap Core G

rowth

6.51

ICM

Sm

all Com

pany6.57

Dodge &

Cox Int'l

9.50

Am

erican Funds EuroP

acific Gr

9.67

Boston Trust Fixed Incom

e - Boulder F&

P11.19

Met W

est Total Return

3.87

Eaton V

ance Floating Rate; I

6.65

JPM

organ High Y

ield Select

1.91

Crdt S

uis Com

m R

tn Strat

4.37

LastQ

uarter2015

1Year

3Years

5Years

10Years

Since InceptionJuly-1990

Boulder Fire and P

olice1.93

-3.25-3.25

6.816.34

5.998.22


12/31/15

*Innovest relies on 3rd party data for these returns. Periods greater than one year are annualized.

hlevin

Typewritten Text

hlevin

Typewritten Text

The pie chart and accompanying data show

n for each portfolio illustrates the percentage allocated to each fund.

How

is the portfolio diversified?

Investment perform

ance results shown above represent past perform

ance and are not indicative of future results. Please read the

information contained in the applicable fund prospectuses carefully before investing m

oney.

Past P

erformance

Risk Level:The am

ount of expected risk in the Portfolio. R

isk is measured by the potential loss over a 12-m

onth period that an investorm

ight expect in the Portfolio, and is calculated via a statistical process consistent w

ith 95% probability.

Moderate:-17.0%

to -19.0%

Expected Return: The level of expected investm

ent return from the P

ortfolio. The range of returns shown below

indicates the potentialgain that an investor m

ight expect each year, on average, over a 5-year period. This is also referred to as the "mean" return, and is

calculated using a statistical process to determine a range of probabilities.

Moderate:6.5%

to 8.5%


Understanding Your Professionally-M

anaged Portfolios

Portfolio A

llocation (%)


The fund seeks the highest total return over

time consistent w

ith an emphasis on both

capital appreciation and income.

The fund pursues its objective by investing in

a diversified portfolio. Under norm

alconditions, the portfolio’s allocation to thebroad asset classes w

ill be within the

following ranges: stocks (50-70%

); bonds (20-40%

); and money m

arkets (0-20%).

Dom

estic stocks are drawn from

the overallU

.S. m

arket. International stocks areselected prim

arily from large com

panies indeveloped m

arkets but may also include

investments in em

erging markets. B

onds,w

hich can include foreign issues, areprim

arily investment grade (i.e., assigned

one of the four highest credit ratings) and arechosen across the entire governm

ent,corporate, and asset- and m

ortgage-backedbond m

arkets. Maturities reflect the

manager’s outlook for interest rates.

Past P

erformance (%

)*

Expense R

atio:0.68%

Decem

ber 31, 2015 : $110,986,269

Boston Trust E

quity - Boulder F&

P39.76

Victory M

under Mid C

ap Core G

rowth

6.51

ICM

Sm

all Com

pany6.57

Dodge &

Cox Int'l

9.50

Am

erican Funds EuroP

acific Gr

9.67

Boston Trust Fixed Incom

e - Boulder F&

P11.19

Met W

est Total Return

3.87

Eaton V

ance Floating Rate; I

6.65

JPM

organ High Y

ield Select

1.91

Crdt S

uis Com

m R

tn Strat

4.37

LastQ

uarter2015

1Year

3Years

5Years

10Years

Since InceptionJuly-1990

Boulder Fire and P

olice1.93

-3.25-3.25

6.816.34

5.998.22


12/31/15

*Innovest relies on 3rd party data for these returns. Periods greater than one year are annualized.

Documents

PORTFOLIO REVIEW 4th Quarter 2015