Upload
yang-yu-huang
View
220
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This portfolio collects my works of Architecture and Urbanism from 2004 to 2008. Receiived admissions from University of Michigan MUD program and Univeristy of Austin MUD program.
Citation preview
YANG-YU HUANG
2003 - 2008Academic Work
Thanks for Your Review
Skills
D. P. V. City - Paradigm of City Planning
Thesis
Urban Architecture Design
Architecture Design in Two Islands
Size and Barter - Four Sizes x Four Programs
Academic Writing - Undifferentiated City
1: Methodology of City Planning
2: Context and Paradigm
3: The Sampling of Experiment
4: Activate the Density
5: Activate the Program
6: Activate the Volume
Postscript:
Size - S, M, L, XL
Barter - [O]ffice, [S]chool, [L]ibrary, [M]arket
Building with Regulation
Building with Chaos
Building with Urban Form
Outside: Four Temporary Voids
Inside: The Two Exhibition
Temporary Details
A Bio-Climatic Architecture
Exhibition and Landscape Plan
Application of Water Tank
Border Ecotone
Alabawan - The Further Border
Community Centre Plan of Alabawan
Concrete Wall is the Border
Temporary Void - Future Concept Store
First Island: Jiju Island - Hill of Sea Women Museum
Second Island: Ho-Ping Island - Border Ecotone
Public or Private - Public Lavatory
Issues
Skills
D. P. V. City - Paradigm of City Planning
Thesis
Urban Architecture Design
Architecture Design in Two Islands
Size and Barter - Four Sizes x Four Programs
Academic Writing - Undifferentiated City
1: Methodology of City Planning
2: Context and Paradigm
3: The Sampling of Experiment
4: Activate the Density
5: Activate the Program
6: Activate the Volume
Postscript:
Size - S, M, L, XL
Barter - [O]ffice, [S]chool, [L]ibrary, [M]arket
Building with Regulation
Building with Chaos
Building with Urban Form
Outside: Four Temporary Voids
Inside: The Two Exhibition
Temporary Details
A Bio-Climatic Architecture
Exhibition and Landscape Plan
Application of Water Tank
Border Ecotone
Alabawan - The Further Border
Community Centre Plan of Alabawan
Concrete Wall is the Border
Temporary Void - Future Concept Store
First Island: Jiju Island - Hill of Sea Women Museum
Second Island: Ho-Ping Island - Border Ecotone
Public or Private - Public Lavatory
Issues
No natural history can be interpreted in the
absence of at least some implicit body
of intertwined theoretical and methodological belief
that permits selection, evaluation, and criticism.
If that body of belief is not already implicit in
the collection of facts- in which case more
than “mere facts” are at hand- it must be externally supplied,
perhaps by a current metaphysic, by another science,
or by personal and historical accident.
Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolution
1: Methodology of City Planning
Part 1. Research D.P.V. City
Thesis Design 2007 - 2008
Advisor: Chun-Hsiung, Wang
2: Context and Paradigm - Sampling of Taipei City
Part 2. Acitvate D.P.V. City
3: The Sampling of Experiment - Lian-yun Block
4: Activate the Density - Density Arrangement of Lian-yun Block
5: Activate the Program - Program Resources of Lian- yun Block
6: Activate the Volume - Form the D.P.V. City
Postscript:
Thesis: D.P.V. City - Paradigm of City Planning
No natural history can be interpreted in the
absence of at least some implicit body
of intertwined theoretical and methodological belief
that permits selection, evaluation, and criticism.
If that body of belief is not already implicit in
the collection of facts- in which case more
than “mere facts” are at hand- it must be externally supplied,
perhaps by a current metaphysic, by another science,
or by personal and historical accident.
Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolution
1: Methodology of City Planning
Part 1. Research D.P.V. City
Thesis Design 2007 - 2008
Advisor: Chun-Hsiung, Wang
2: Context and Paradigm - Sampling of Taipei City
Part 2. Acitvate D.P.V. City
3: The Sampling of Experiment - Lian-yun Block
4: Activate the Density - Density Arrangement of Lian-yun Block
5: Activate the Program - Program Resources of Lian- yun Block
6: Activate the Volume - Form the D.P.V. City
Postscript:
Thesis: D.P.V. City - Paradigm of City Planning
1: Methodology of City Planning 2: Context and Paradigm
What kind of methodology is useful to help us to design a new paradigm of city planning that can change the current one, but it still cares the original
local context? Moreover, when we face a city that already has the complete city form but its condition is chaos and weak, it means that the current
paradigm of the city is failed. So we need to find a new one of city planning that has the ability to replace the current on same location. It is not to
create a complete new city on other side.
Why do we need to face the situation of city planning? There have the two reasons. First, it is no more meaning to extend a current city. In the
modern world, the scale of city is too massive but it is still congested especially the Asian cities. If we expect to extend the size of cities, they only
create new satellite cities or other cities, and most importantly, the original city still need renewable completely to fulfill new necessities of future.
Second, the development of an original city is over fifty years until now. Even though the current city planning is poor, we still can find out many
resources from local context and it will be useful to make ideas for new paradigm of city planning.
Following the concept, we can not only decrease the waste of resources but also have the better scheme to recovery the heritage of cities. For example, it is possible that we can change the city form dramatically but the basic road system and local heritage are protected well. It is truly a positive work.
So if a city can follow a new paradigm in the modern world, what kind of methodology is workable for the job?The question always stays there through all work of D.P.V. City.
In the D.P.V. City, I decide the tools that are useful to realize the original city, and then using them to design the city to follow a new paradigm of city planning. Furthermore, I also design the process that assists the tools. In the end, the tools (Density, Program, and Volume) and Process (Round of List, Comparison, and Option) are the ideas of the methodology of city planning.
1-1: Tools (Density, Program, and Volume) 1-2: Process (Round of List, Comparison, and Option)
1-1a: The Belief of City Planning
Operation of the three tools follows a belief that it is the time we can make the deep assessment of the current city. The reason is that it is hard to expect a new city that is constructed from an empty space in the modern world. The experience of Dubai is scarce. In my country, it is impossible to provide a cause of new city because almost all chances are stayed in the capital. So if we deny the above possibility, it is rational to design a better planning of our existed city. Is it operated well with past or current paradigm
? We need precise statistic or diagram to figure out the situation. Furthermore, we also can use them to improve the city environment. The most importantly, It is necessary to assess the new city again and again to make sure the new ideas is workable or not. It is the belief that the continuous assessment of city is necessary because the operation of city is never stop in any time.
time. The different kinds of substances can be transformed into readable information as statistic and diagram. The simple scientific method has enough power to transform the truth into the evidence. It is the basic material to help people have a discussion of city planning.
1-1b: The Scientific Tool of Assessment
Using the scientific tools to make a continuous assessment is rational because the statistic and diagram can operate well at any
1-1c: The Different Tools face the Same Truth
It is possible that we can use the three different tools to read the same truth and then the result would provide the clear viewpoint. For a simple example:
1-2a: List
When we only know the population density of
a city is no meaning, but when we list other population densities of other cities, it would be easy to realize which one is the most congested. The simple idea can be used not only for density but also for program and volume. The different kinds of lists are effective to solve an old problem or make a new perspective through D.P.V. City.
Following the regional requirement, a little space can be used to be a reading room (program) and we expect that the room needs to contain ten people in the same time (density). But size of the reading room is 30 m3 (volume). Is it rational? If it is not rational, which tool is the most appropriate to be changed. I think it can be so simple but also can be so difficult. The truth is fixed but the perspective of option is changed.
1-2b: Comparison
The work of comparison is to find out which one is the most rational in a list. In a city planning, it is more necessary to choose a rational condition rather than logical condition
because the city is too complicate so the logic is always failed in some part. Using the comparison to pursue a rational option is rational.
1-2c: Option
For example, choosing an option in a list that compares the density arrangement is the first step, but following the 1-1c idea, we can use the option to make the other list that compares the program. The status of same option can be changed to explain or solve problems in different sectors.
In the Portfolio, I abandonor combine some chapter of D. P. V. City.The thesis can be readedefficiently.
The tools (Density, Program, and Volume) of city planning are so simple but it makes the most conspicuous possibility of operation. In the condition, we can have the consensus of
statistic, diagram, and pure form. The discussion is workable because the basic knowledge and common sense are mixed to create the new paradigm of city planning. So it
is also the work that I need to make many conversations with my advisors and the instruct professor in the period of thesiswork
The idea of tools is useful to operate the designing process of D.P.V. City. The idea of process also is so simple that I try to make a continuous comparison of density, program,
and volume. When I find out a new question of a subject, the first work is to list other same kind of subjects, then making a comparison of them and, in the end, finding out the interesting
viewpoint from the option. It is a round in a sector. The several rounds lead the development of scheme to construct D.P.V. City.
1: Methodology of City Planning 2: Context and Paradigm
What kind of methodology is useful to help us to design a new paradigm of city planning that can change the current one, but it still cares the original
local context? Moreover, when we face a city that already has the complete city form but its condition is chaos and weak, it means that the current
paradigm of the city is failed. So we need to find a new one of city planning that has the ability to replace the current on same location. It is not to
create a complete new city on other side.
Why do we need to face the situation of city planning? There have the two reasons. First, it is no more meaning to extend a current city. In the
modern world, the scale of city is too massive but it is still congested especially the Asian cities. If we expect to extend the size of cities, they only
create new satellite cities or other cities, and most importantly, the original city still need renewable completely to fulfill new necessities of future.
Second, the development of an original city is over fifty years until now. Even though the current city planning is poor, we still can find out many
resources from local context and it will be useful to make ideas for new paradigm of city planning.
Following the concept, we can not only decrease the waste of resources but also have the better scheme to recovery the heritage of cities. For example, it is possible that we can change the city form dramatically but the basic road system and local heritage are protected well. It is truly a positive work.
So if a city can follow a new paradigm in the modern world, what kind of methodology is workable for the job?The question always stays there through all work of D.P.V. City.
In the D.P.V. City, I decide the tools that are useful to realize the original city, and then using them to design the city to follow a new paradigm of city planning. Furthermore, I also design the process that assists the tools. In the end, the tools (Density, Program, and Volume) and Process (Round of List, Comparison, and Option) are the ideas of the methodology of city planning.
1-1: Tools (Density, Program, and Volume) 1-2: Process (Round of List, Comparison, and Option)
1-1a: The Belief of City Planning
Operation of the three tools follows a belief that it is the time we can make the deep assessment of the current city. The reason is that it is hard to expect a new city that is constructed from an empty space in the modern world. The experience of Dubai is scarce. In my country, it is impossible to provide a cause of new city because almost all chances are stayed in the capital. So if we deny the above possibility, it is rational to design a better planning of our existed city. Is it operated well with past or current paradigm
? We need precise statistic or diagram to figure out the situation. Furthermore, we also can use them to improve the city environment. The most importantly, It is necessary to assess the new city again and again to make sure the new ideas is workable or not. It is the belief that the continuous assessment of city is necessary because the operation of city is never stop in any time.
time. The different kinds of substances can be transformed into readable information as statistic and diagram. The simple scientific method has enough power to transform the truth into the evidence. It is the basic material to help people have a discussion of city planning.
1-1b: The Scientific Tool of Assessment
Using the scientific tools to make a continuous assessment is rational because the statistic and diagram can operate well at any
1-1c: The Different Tools face the Same Truth
It is possible that we can use the three different tools to read the same truth and then the result would provide the clear viewpoint. For a simple example:
1-2a: List
When we only know the population density of
a city is no meaning, but when we list other population densities of other cities, it would be easy to realize which one is the most congested. The simple idea can be used not only for density but also for program and volume. The different kinds of lists are effective to solve an old problem or make a new perspective through D.P.V. City.
Following the regional requirement, a little space can be used to be a reading room (program) and we expect that the room needs to contain ten people in the same time (density). But size of the reading room is 30 m3 (volume). Is it rational? If it is not rational, which tool is the most appropriate to be changed. I think it can be so simple but also can be so difficult. The truth is fixed but the perspective of option is changed.
1-2b: Comparison
The work of comparison is to find out which one is the most rational in a list. In a city planning, it is more necessary to choose a rational condition rather than logical condition
because the city is too complicate so the logic is always failed in some part. Using the comparison to pursue a rational option is rational.
1-2c: Option
For example, choosing an option in a list that compares the density arrangement is the first step, but following the 1-1c idea, we can use the option to make the other list that compares the program. The status of same option can be changed to explain or solve problems in different sectors.
In the Portfolio, I abandonor combine some chapter of D. P. V. City.The thesis can be readedefficiently.
The tools (Density, Program, and Volume) of city planning are so simple but it makes the most conspicuous possibility of operation. In the condition, we can have the consensus of
statistic, diagram, and pure form. The discussion is workable because the basic knowledge and common sense are mixed to create the new paradigm of city planning. So it
is also the work that I need to make many conversations with my advisors and the instruct professor in the period of thesiswork
The idea of tools is useful to operate the designing process of D.P.V. City. The idea of process also is so simple that I try to make a continuous comparison of density, program,
and volume. When I find out a new question of a subject, the first work is to list other same kind of subjects, then making a comparison of them and, in the end, finding out the interesting
viewpoint from the option. It is a round in a sector. The several rounds lead the development of scheme to construct D.P.V. City.
SAMPLE 1.
SAMPLE 1. SAMPLE 2. SAMPLE 3. SAMPLE 4. SAMPLE 5. SAMPLE 6. SAMPLE 7. SAMPLE 8.
SAMPLE 2.
SAMPLE 3.
SAMPLE 4.
SAMPLE 5.
SAMPLE 6.
SAMPLE 7.
SAMPLE 8.
FARMLAND
Paradigm 1.
Paradigm 2.
Paradigm 3.
Administrative Residencial
Paradigm 1.
Paradigm 2.
Paradigm 3.
Administrative
Factory
Taipei City Government
Shopping Mall
3: The Sampling of Experiment - Lian-yun Block
If trying to reappear the different sector of development of urban form, it would make the contradiction that no matter what reason the blocks were formed, the superimposed building only follow the current paradigm: the real estate of new principle of FAR (Floor Area Ratio).
Monga Village1709
Connection + Geography
Taipei Castle1885
Connection +Politics (China)
Simon Market1895
Connection + Economy
Administrative District1935
Politics (Japan)
Lian-yun Block1944
Connection +Japanese
Official Residences
Tun-Hwa South Road1980
Modern Urban Design +Economy
Water Canal1980
Modern Urban Design +Geography
Xinyi District1990
Modern Urban Design +Economy
2-2-1: Paradigm of Block
2-2-1: Paradigm of Block 1~8
Following the purposes of designing blocks, they always make sense for partial planning, but if we follow the view of topology, it would be easy to divide all blocks into three paradigms:
1. Focus of Society Politics2. Medieval street, and 3. Modern grid urban design.
Sometimes they are mixed for composite reasons (not purposes). The eight blocks each has the ability to earn enough information only by their forms. The blocks had program that obeyed their paradigm.
2-2-2: Paradigm of BuildingOriginally, the building form was constructed with its block because most of the time, the building allocation decides the roads’ direction, size, and even material. Buildings can be any form that fulfills its function. So how do we divide the building form into different paradigm?
FAR is one way that we can set the partitions for FAR intothree paradigms. The three paradigms also were covered from historical data, and the data proved it:
FAR 0.20 Shed, and 2.25 or 4.00 old or modern apartment building.
2-2: Displacement of Paradigms
2-1: Mapping - Old Town & New Town
Firstly, partial planning of a newer block cannot match the form of nearby past block completely, so the road system is broken.
Secondly, the current paradigm of building usually is cube but it cannot match the single block form that is abnormal shape.
ResidencialResidencialResidencialResidencial ResidencialOld Town New Town
FAR 0.20
FAR 4.00
FAR 2.25
N 76° W
N 89° W
S 81° WS 74° E
S 88° E
S 88° E
S 88° E
West EastOld Town
New Town
Core
Tiny Grid Massive Grid
Connection Connection Incision
Massive GridGrid
1709 1885 1944 1990
Taipei Station
Administration
Shopping Mall
2008
0m1200m
Like other Asian city, Taipei city is ordinary on its urban form because it has lacked planning to face the condition of population explosion in a short time. The city did not have time to adjust its density, public spaces, and skyline, etc. and quickly it was covered by a new principle that is greed.
The context is broken, and new paradigm is powerful but chaos. The city development is sick. In this way, the sampling of Taipei can help us to find out practical cause of the disease.
Following the mapping, it is not hard to figure out the block form that divides into the widely different two parts: the classic and modern outline.
The hidden information from the block form is invisible in the first time if we can not construct the groups of block units in the right way. However, the property of topology is an ideal catalyst that helps us to identify the meaning of elements, not just the accurate measure. For example, in the west side, many block units have the “core” that was a collecting centre. It was a pinpoint of early emigrants to connect the relationship with their society. People could have gathering, but the function is disappeared in the modern Taipei city, and the core only be occupied by mobiles that follow current traffic system.
In this way, it is possible to find out the property of different block forms. The characters represent that block forms have their purposes to be constructed, so blocks had programs originally. But the question is: Can the programs of blocks be continuous from past to now?In the other words, can the program of blocks still keep suitable when they were superimposed a completely new paradigm of buildings?
5. 6. 7. 8.
4.
3.2.
1.
FARMLAND
JAPANESE OFFICIAL RESIDENCES
1944RAILWAY
Administration Factory
2: Context and Paradigm - Sampling of Taipei City
SAMPLE 1.
SAMPLE 1. SAMPLE 2. SAMPLE 3. SAMPLE 4. SAMPLE 5. SAMPLE 6. SAMPLE 7. SAMPLE 8.
SAMPLE 2.
SAMPLE 3.
SAMPLE 4.
SAMPLE 5.
SAMPLE 6.
SAMPLE 7.
SAMPLE 8.
FARMLAND
Paradigm 1.
Paradigm 2.
Paradigm 3.
Administrative Residencial
Paradigm 1.
Paradigm 2.
Paradigm 3.
Administrative
Factory
Taipei City Government
Shopping Mall
3: The Sampling of Experiment - Lian-yun Block
If trying to reappear the different sector of development of urban form, it would make the contradiction that no matter what reason the blocks were formed, the superimposed building only follow the current paradigm: the real estate of new principle of FAR (Floor Area Ratio).
Monga Village1709
Connection + Geography
Taipei Castle1885
Connection +Politics (China)
Simon Market1895
Connection + Economy
Administrative District1935
Politics (Japan)
Lian-yun Block1944
Connection +Japanese
Official Residences
Tun-Hwa South Road1980
Modern Urban Design +Economy
Water Canal1980
Modern Urban Design +Geography
Xinyi District1990
Modern Urban Design +Economy
2-2-1: Paradigm of Block
2-2-1: Paradigm of Block 1~8
Following the purposes of designing blocks, they always make sense for partial planning, but if we follow the view of topology, it would be easy to divide all blocks into three paradigms:
1. Focus of Society Politics2. Medieval street, and 3. Modern grid urban design.
Sometimes they are mixed for composite reasons (not purposes). The eight blocks each has the ability to earn enough information only by their forms. The blocks had program that obeyed their paradigm.
2-2-2: Paradigm of BuildingOriginally, the building form was constructed with its block because most of the time, the building allocation decides the roads’ direction, size, and even material. Buildings can be any form that fulfills its function. So how do we divide the building form into different paradigm?
FAR is one way that we can set the partitions for FAR intothree paradigms. The three paradigms also were covered from historical data, and the data proved it:
FAR 0.20 Shed, and 2.25 or 4.00 old or modern apartment building.
2-2: Displacement of Paradigms
2-1: Mapping - Old Town & New Town
Firstly, partial planning of a newer block cannot match the form of nearby past block completely, so the road system is broken.
Secondly, the current paradigm of building usually is cube but it cannot match the single block form that is abnormal shape.
ResidencialResidencialResidencialResidencial ResidencialOld Town New Town
FAR 0.20
FAR 4.00
FAR 2.25
N 76° W
N 89° W
S 81° WS 74° E
S 88° E
S 88° E
S 88° E
West EastOld Town
New Town
Core
Tiny Grid Massive Grid
Connection Connection Incision
Massive GridGrid
1709 1885 1944 1990
Taipei Station
Administration
Shopping Mall
2008
0m1200m
Like other Asian city, Taipei city is ordinary on its urban form because it has lacked planning to face the condition of population explosion in a short time. The city did not have time to adjust its density, public spaces, and skyline, etc. and quickly it was covered by a new principle that is greed.
The context is broken, and new paradigm is powerful but chaos. The city development is sick. In this way, the sampling of Taipei can help us to find out practical cause of the disease.
Following the mapping, it is not hard to figure out the block form that divides into the widely different two parts: the classic and modern outline.
The hidden information from the block form is invisible in the first time if we can not construct the groups of block units in the right way. However, the property of topology is an ideal catalyst that helps us to identify the meaning of elements, not just the accurate measure. For example, in the west side, many block units have the “core” that was a collecting centre. It was a pinpoint of early emigrants to connect the relationship with their society. People could have gathering, but the function is disappeared in the modern Taipei city, and the core only be occupied by mobiles that follow current traffic system.
In this way, it is possible to find out the property of different block forms. The characters represent that block forms have their purposes to be constructed, so blocks had programs originally. But the question is: Can the programs of blocks be continuous from past to now?In the other words, can the program of blocks still keep suitable when they were superimposed a completely new paradigm of buildings?
5. 6. 7. 8.
4.
3.2.
1.
FARMLAND
JAPANESE OFFICIAL RESIDENCES
1944RAILWAY
Administration Factory
2: Context and Paradigm - Sampling of Taipei City
Floor 0 ~ 2
FAR 0.20 FAR 0.20 FAR 2.25FAR 4.00
Floor 3 ~ 5Floor 6 ~ 10Floor 11 ~
Dwelling no.3 FAR 2.25
Dwelling no.3-1FAR 3.00
Dwelling no.3-2FAR 4.00
Park
Dwelling no.3FAR 5.60
1 ~ 3 m3.1 ~ 6 m6.1 ~ 9 m9.1 ~ m
1944
2008 True FAR
1932
1944?1932?
2008
2008
3: The Sampling of Experiment - Lian-yun Block
4: Activate the Density - Density Arrangement of Lian-yun Block
Reason : Lian-yun Block is classic in Taipei city with the aspects of D.P.V.: the classic density (10000 people / 22ha for whole block = 455 people / 1ha, the block original program (The district of Japanese Official Residences is the original purpose of block form), and superimposing of the traditional volume (FAR 2.25 or 4.00) but it is scanty of well planning.
The classic density (10000 people / 22ha)
Planned FAR≠ True FAREvery city has an official guide of urban design, but for some city, it is too complicated and meaninglessly flexible, so it never plays the most important role to supervise the city environment. The contradiction grows extremely for a city. The banal planned FAR is far away for true FAR, and no one can obtain any benefit for the contradiction, just only aggravation. The city’s possibility is hidden.
Expected FAR
Width of the Streets
Weak Connection
Outline of the Block Planning FAR
Imbalance of RoadConnection betweenWest and East
Same Paradigmbetween1932 and 1944
Farmland withWater Canal
Japanese OfficialResidences
The Main Road Systemworks well but SubsidiaryRoad System works poorly
Different Paradigmbetween1944 and 2008
A. High Level RevenueB. Middle Level RevenueC. Low Level Revenue
A. Cover by AvenueB. New Avenue
B. A.
A.
B.
C.
C.
C. C. C.
B.
It would be a disaster if we cannot abandonthe current planning of real estate in Taipei city. Moreover, the city needs a new paradigm. The paradigm may have the ability to provide diversity of density arrangement and recoveries the contexts that suits the original program of block.
?The population density of a city never stay in a moment or an area, instead, it would increase, decrease, or even transform at any time. People usually careless the urban form but it changes gradually. How do we realize and control the dynamic situation for a city? The exact sampling and compared statistics for a continuous variation would be useful to sensor why Taipei city has the subtle form in the time.
Providing a new condition or a catalyst for current density of Taipei city can stimulate imagination for the other Taipei. Activating the Density is the first step to reconstruct a new city that follows a new paradigm. It would lead other possibilities after.
Following the idea of variation of density, can we expect that we may have the ability to recovery part of the context of Lian-yun block program: Japanese official residences?
Floor 0 ~ 2
FAR 0.20 FAR 0.20 FAR 2.25FAR 4.00
Floor 3 ~ 5Floor 6 ~ 10Floor 11 ~
Dwelling no.3 FAR 2.25
Dwelling no.3-1FAR 3.00
Dwelling no.3-2FAR 4.00
Park
Dwelling no.3FAR 5.60
1 ~ 3 m3.1 ~ 6 m6.1 ~ 9 m9.1 ~ m
1944
2008 True FAR
1932
1944?1932?
2008
2008
3: The Sampling of Experiment - Lian-yun Block
4: Activate the Density - Density Arrangement of Lian-yun Block
Reason : Lian-yun Block is classic in Taipei city with the aspects of D.P.V.: the classic density (10000 people / 22ha for whole block = 455 people / 1ha, the block original program (The district of Japanese Official Residences is the original purpose of block form), and superimposing of the traditional volume (FAR 2.25 or 4.00) but it is scanty of well planning.
The classic density (10000 people / 22ha)
Planned FAR≠ True FAREvery city has an official guide of urban design, but for some city, it is too complicated and meaninglessly flexible, so it never plays the most important role to supervise the city environment. The contradiction grows extremely for a city. The banal planned FAR is far away for true FAR, and no one can obtain any benefit for the contradiction, just only aggravation. The city’s possibility is hidden.
Expected FAR
Width of the Streets
Weak Connection
Outline of the Block Planning FAR
Imbalance of RoadConnection betweenWest and East
Same Paradigmbetween1932 and 1944
Farmland withWater Canal
Japanese OfficialResidences
The Main Road Systemworks well but SubsidiaryRoad System works poorly
Different Paradigmbetween1944 and 2008
A. High Level RevenueB. Middle Level RevenueC. Low Level Revenue
A. Cover by AvenueB. New Avenue
B. A.
A.
B.
C.
C.
C. C. C.
B.
It would be a disaster if we cannot abandonthe current planning of real estate in Taipei city. Moreover, the city needs a new paradigm. The paradigm may have the ability to provide diversity of density arrangement and recoveries the contexts that suits the original program of block.
?The population density of a city never stay in a moment or an area, instead, it would increase, decrease, or even transform at any time. People usually careless the urban form but it changes gradually. How do we realize and control the dynamic situation for a city? The exact sampling and compared statistics for a continuous variation would be useful to sensor why Taipei city has the subtle form in the time.
Providing a new condition or a catalyst for current density of Taipei city can stimulate imagination for the other Taipei. Activating the Density is the first step to reconstruct a new city that follows a new paradigm. It would lead other possibilities after.
Following the idea of variation of density, can we expect that we may have the ability to recovery part of the context of Lian-yun block program: Japanese official residences?
100A
200B
300C
400D
600F
700G
800H
900I
1000J
0OP
FAR 0.00Floor 0Mix Trees
FAR 1.91Floor 3~6Mix TreesandBusinessChaos
FAR 0.13Floor 1~2Mix Trees
FAR 0.30Floor 1~2Mix Trees
FAR 3.08Floor 3~6Mix Business
FAR 2.25Floor 7
FAR 3.82Floor 5~8 Congestion
Congestion
Chaos
Chaos
FAR 2.45Floor 9
FAR 4.54Floor 12
FAR 8.64Floor 17
Business
Business
Open Park
Open Park
South Elevation North Elevation
South Elevation North Elevation
South Elevation North Elevation
South Elevation North Elevation
South Elevation North Elevation
South Elevation North Elevation
South Elevation North Elevation
South Elevation North Elevation
South Elevation North Elevation
South Elevation North Elevation
4-1: Assessment of Density [A. ~ J.] [100 ~ 1000 people / 1ha in Taipei] 4-2: Reconstruct the Density Group
4-1-1: Paradigm 1. - Cover the Area of Taipei cityA.100 and B.200: The building paradigm was formed from 1900 to 1950. All of that are Japanese residences and they perfectly match the original model of Lian-yun Block.
4-1-2: Paradigm 2. - Cover the Area of Taipei cityC.300: The same building paradigm with D.400 and E.500, it is an exception and also a surviving chance for the kind of paradigm because it has a suit public park. Arranging it in a right way and it would be the other A.100 or B.200.
D.400 and D.500: The density D.400 and E.500 are covering most area of Taipei city because they were formed with the era of population explosion that matches the beginning of current Taipei city. The city grows slowly and loses the chance to own progress for whole area in the mid-town of Taipei city.
4-1-3: Paradigm 3. - Cover the Area of Taipei cityE.600: It is also a chance to save G.700 because it arranges it’s FAR more rational. However, it only sets on suburb now. A transplant operation of E.600 can be an option for Taipei City form.
The density between 400 ~ 500 people/ha is the most common condtion in Taipei City. If we expect to discard the old paradigm of Taipei city, it means that we need to discard the density zone to be the first choice.
G.700: Form of G.700: would be a primary new paradigm in Taipei. It may have progress hardware that compares with D.400 or E.500, but it still represents the more congestion for an area, a block. It cannot take any benefit for surrounding environment.
H.800, I.900, and J.1000: They are the highest density groups and all of them are public housing, providing for middle-class family, more congestion, less personal space. What we can expect is their open space and security. If higher congestion can release more open space nearby, it also can be an ideal option.
Measuring of population density is complex because it never stays in a fixed quantity in an area, so transforming the population density to urban form also never stays in a fixed form in an area, too. Can we find a way to assess the density of Taipei city in some kinds of fixed form or FAR? Following the Chapter 2 (Context and Paradigm), Taipei city’s building form is exclusive. The paradigm has leaded the people to construct their city in one way. In an era, they only have designed a fixed form with a fixed density. For example, the density of D. 400 people/ 1 ha in Taipei, it was made only with the form
with FAR 2.25, 4 to 6 floors, no public space, and congestion because the situation was an echo of the population explosion from 1970 to 1990. The population densities of Taipei city from 0 to 1000 / 1 ha [OP., A. to J.] can divide into three paradigms that teach people who live in Taipei city for one hundred years. Moreover, the three paradigms of density form [A. to J.] are only existed building form in the modern world that we can see.
500E
FAR 3.40Floor 3~6Mix Business
Business
South Elevation North Elevation
OP. [0 x 22] = 0 people / 22ha
A. [100 x 22] = 2200 people / 22ha
B. [200 x 22] = 4400 people / 22ha
C. [300 x 22] = 6600 people / 22ha
F. [600 x 22] = 13200 people / 22ha
G. [700 x 22] = 15400 people / 22ha
H. [800 x 22] = 17600 people / 22ha
I. [900 x 22] = 19800 people / 22ha
J. [1000 x 22] = 22000 people / 22ha
Even: 10000 people / 22 ha
D. [400 x 22] = 8800 people / 22ha
E. [500 x 22] = 11000 people / 22ha
We must need a completely uneven city form in the future. The question is: Is it possible to pursue an extreme city form, in the mean time, and pursue a relatively rational city form? It is the other contradiction.
Can we expect an even city form that only follows a paradigm in an area of 22ha, a block area? Furthermore, can we expect an even city form that helps Taipei city to keep continuous development?
Model E. is the closest with the Current Taipei City Form
65%
5%
30%
Even: + Heritages <10000 people / 22 ha Even: + Heritages + New Residences = 10000 people / 22 ha
Uneven: + Heritages + New Residences = 10000 people / 22 haUneven: + Heritages < 10000 people / 22 ha Uneven: + Heritages < 10000 people / 22 ha
100A
200B
300C
400D
600F
700G
800H
900I
1000J
0OP
FAR 0.00Floor 0Mix Trees
FAR 1.91Floor 3~6Mix TreesandBusinessChaos
FAR 0.13Floor 1~2Mix Trees
FAR 0.30Floor 1~2Mix Trees
FAR 3.08Floor 3~6Mix Business
FAR 2.25Floor 7
FAR 3.82Floor 5~8 Congestion
Congestion
Chaos
Chaos
FAR 2.45Floor 9
FAR 4.54Floor 12
FAR 8.64Floor 17
Business
Business
Open Park
Open Park
South Elevation North Elevation
South Elevation North Elevation
South Elevation North Elevation
South Elevation North Elevation
South Elevation North Elevation
South Elevation North Elevation
South Elevation North Elevation
South Elevation North Elevation
South Elevation North Elevation
South Elevation North Elevation
4-1: Assessment of Density [A. ~ J.] [100 ~ 1000 people / 1ha in Taipei] 4-2: Reconstruct the Density Group
4-1-1: Paradigm 1. - Cover the Area of Taipei cityA.100 and B.200: The building paradigm was formed from 1900 to 1950. All of that are Japanese residences and they perfectly match the original model of Lian-yun Block.
4-1-2: Paradigm 2. - Cover the Area of Taipei cityC.300: The same building paradigm with D.400 and E.500, it is an exception and also a surviving chance for the kind of paradigm because it has a suit public park. Arranging it in a right way and it would be the other A.100 or B.200.
D.400 and D.500: The density D.400 and E.500 are covering most area of Taipei city because they were formed with the era of population explosion that matches the beginning of current Taipei city. The city grows slowly and loses the chance to own progress for whole area in the mid-town of Taipei city.
4-1-3: Paradigm 3. - Cover the Area of Taipei cityE.600: It is also a chance to save G.700 because it arranges it’s FAR more rational. However, it only sets on suburb now. A transplant operation of E.600 can be an option for Taipei City form.
The density between 400 ~ 500 people/ha is the most common condtion in Taipei City. If we expect to discard the old paradigm of Taipei city, it means that we need to discard the density zone to be the first choice.
G.700: Form of G.700: would be a primary new paradigm in Taipei. It may have progress hardware that compares with D.400 or E.500, but it still represents the more congestion for an area, a block. It cannot take any benefit for surrounding environment.
H.800, I.900, and J.1000: They are the highest density groups and all of them are public housing, providing for middle-class family, more congestion, less personal space. What we can expect is their open space and security. If higher congestion can release more open space nearby, it also can be an ideal option.
Measuring of population density is complex because it never stays in a fixed quantity in an area, so transforming the population density to urban form also never stays in a fixed form in an area, too. Can we find a way to assess the density of Taipei city in some kinds of fixed form or FAR? Following the Chapter 2 (Context and Paradigm), Taipei city’s building form is exclusive. The paradigm has leaded the people to construct their city in one way. In an era, they only have designed a fixed form with a fixed density. For example, the density of D. 400 people/ 1 ha in Taipei, it was made only with the form
with FAR 2.25, 4 to 6 floors, no public space, and congestion because the situation was an echo of the population explosion from 1970 to 1990. The population densities of Taipei city from 0 to 1000 / 1 ha [OP., A. to J.] can divide into three paradigms that teach people who live in Taipei city for one hundred years. Moreover, the three paradigms of density form [A. to J.] are only existed building form in the modern world that we can see.
500E
FAR 3.40Floor 3~6Mix Business
Business
South Elevation North Elevation
OP. [0 x 22] = 0 people / 22ha
A. [100 x 22] = 2200 people / 22ha
B. [200 x 22] = 4400 people / 22ha
C. [300 x 22] = 6600 people / 22ha
F. [600 x 22] = 13200 people / 22ha
G. [700 x 22] = 15400 people / 22ha
H. [800 x 22] = 17600 people / 22ha
I. [900 x 22] = 19800 people / 22ha
J. [1000 x 22] = 22000 people / 22ha
Even: 10000 people / 22 ha
D. [400 x 22] = 8800 people / 22ha
E. [500 x 22] = 11000 people / 22ha
We must need a completely uneven city form in the future. The question is: Is it possible to pursue an extreme city form, in the mean time, and pursue a relatively rational city form? It is the other contradiction.
Can we expect an even city form that only follows a paradigm in an area of 22ha, a block area? Furthermore, can we expect an even city form that helps Taipei city to keep continuous development?
Model E. is the closest with the Current Taipei City Form
65%
5%
30%
Even: + Heritages <10000 people / 22 ha Even: + Heritages + New Residences = 10000 people / 22 ha
Uneven: + Heritages + New Residences = 10000 people / 22 haUneven: + Heritages < 10000 people / 22 ha Uneven: + Heritages < 10000 people / 22 ha
Case.1 [ D.E.G.J. + OP. ]Choosing a middle group in the case is appropriate Adding a massive OP is the powerful method to leave [D.,E.,G.] The subsidiary densities are failed The even quantity in low density can provide more multiple volume
Case.5 [ C.F.H. + ] Case.7 [ A.B.C. + ]Case.3 Erase [ D.G. ]
4-2: Reconstruct the Density Group of Lian-yun Block - 10000 People/ 22ha 4-3: 8 Types to 3 Types of Density Figure
4-2-1: Erase the [D., E., G.] - Control Group 4-2-2: Rewrite Others [OP., A., B., C., F., H., I., J.]- Experimental GroupThe control groups in the experiment have discussion about outline of Taipei city form, so it is rational to be the first step. Furthermore, making judgments is easier than experimental groups because we not only can check current Taipei city form but also can check the density reconstruction of the form. The most important is that the process of erasing is continuous and comparable.
Excluding the density group [D., E., G.] is finished, and designing other possibility of groups is useful to make a comparison between control group and experimental group. A relatively extreme city form can be the option to make a test. So it means that the Case.1 ~ 4 are constructed from middle density to two sides and the Case.5 ~ 8 vice versa.
4-2-1a: Fluctuation 4-2-1b: Catalyst 4-2-1c: ReplacementIncrease or decrease of the population density is basic idea to adjust a city form, and also sustained formation has the trajectory that is valid to identify every stage in a case. In this way, limitary conditions can be figured out and it will be efficient to create a new city form continuously.
When meeting with a few un-ideal states happens, injecting some catalysts (such as enormous or tiny Open Park) into the case can drastically transform a city form into an entirely different city. For example, if it is hard to abandon the group [D., E., G.], it would needs a catalyst that comes from low density or high density to solve the problem.
Researching some replaceable proposal of [D., E., G.] is the most efficient way to leave original groups. For example, in Caes.2, [C., F.] is the option to replace [D., G.]. It would be clear that the [D., G.] is disappeared because the two neighbors replace the function of [C., F.] well.
4-2-2a: Reference 4-2-2b: Support 4-2-2c: SupplyAfter deciding experimental groups, adding other densities into compared types would guide spatial features to be clear. For example, in Case.7, the proportion of [A., B.] can be adjusted to [B., C.] by the variation from extreme [I., J.] to relative rational [F., H.].
Adding one or two other densities can make a more beautiful proportion. In Case.5, group [C., F., H.] is fixed. Then adding [A., J., D., OP., and B.] is supports to modify proportion of group [C., F., H.]. In the compared options, added densities cannot provide any benefits, so it is clear that the original type in the case still is the best option.
What strategy is bold consideration? If having bold idea is an option, the work is to find out how to supply it to be rationalized. For example, in Case.6, group [A., J.] is the setting option. In the extreme urban form, supply of other densities would be useful to create other rational types. In the time, it would be easier to find an ideal type in the case.
Too EvenVlume
TooExtremeVlume
C. 10ha
C. 16ha
F. 14ha
The kindsofCatalystarefailed
It isfailedto addthecatalysts
600:800
400:2400
1400:1200
4000
1000
6000Theextremeconditionisstillexisted
Population3200vs4200
A huge area of single density is not the optionCase.2 [ D.G. -> C.F. ] Case.4 [ E. -> C.G. ]
E= 0 is successiful in the two last groups, and more even one is the optionCase.6 [ A.J. + ]
In the dramatic condition, rationalization is more important The massive J is not the option in any situationCase.8 [ J. + ]
Population
>>
>>
>
Case1.
Case2.
Case3.
Case4.
Case5.
Case6.
Fault
O.K
O.K
O.K
Designing density groups step by step, then they all follow the standard of density 10000 people/ 22ha to construct new density arrangement. From familiar city form to unfamiliar, how many city forms can be imagined? The most important question is that which city forms are ideal to recovery the local context of Lian-yun Block.
It is a traveling from Taipei city to others such as New York, Beijing, Mexico City, etc.
If setting the density group [D.E.G.] represents current Taipei city form and superimposes it into the current Lian-yun block: density 10000 people/ 22ha, we can realize the true current city form clearly.
4-2a: Step1 - Construct Formula 4-2b: Step2 - Discard [D., E., G.] 4-2c: Step3 - Pursue Diversity 4-2d: Step4 - Pursue Rationalization
It is notexisted inthe currentworld
Case.1 [ D.E.G.J. + OP. ]Choosing a middle group in the case is appropriate Adding a massive OP is the powerful method to leave [D.,E.,G.] The subsidiary densities are failed The even quantity in low density can provide more multiple volume
Case.5 [ C.F.H. + ] Case.7 [ A.B.C. + ]Case.3 Erase [ D.G. ]
4-2: Reconstruct the Density Group of Lian-yun Block - 10000 People/ 22ha 4-3: 8 Types to 3 Types of Density Figure
4-2-1: Erase the [D., E., G.] - Control Group 4-2-2: Rewrite Others [OP., A., B., C., F., H., I., J.]- Experimental GroupThe control groups in the experiment have discussion about outline of Taipei city form, so it is rational to be the first step. Furthermore, making judgments is easier than experimental groups because we not only can check current Taipei city form but also can check the density reconstruction of the form. The most important is that the process of erasing is continuous and comparable.
Excluding the density group [D., E., G.] is finished, and designing other possibility of groups is useful to make a comparison between control group and experimental group. A relatively extreme city form can be the option to make a test. So it means that the Case.1 ~ 4 are constructed from middle density to two sides and the Case.5 ~ 8 vice versa.
4-2-1a: Fluctuation 4-2-1b: Catalyst 4-2-1c: ReplacementIncrease or decrease of the population density is basic idea to adjust a city form, and also sustained formation has the trajectory that is valid to identify every stage in a case. In this way, limitary conditions can be figured out and it will be efficient to create a new city form continuously.
When meeting with a few un-ideal states happens, injecting some catalysts (such as enormous or tiny Open Park) into the case can drastically transform a city form into an entirely different city. For example, if it is hard to abandon the group [D., E., G.], it would needs a catalyst that comes from low density or high density to solve the problem.
Researching some replaceable proposal of [D., E., G.] is the most efficient way to leave original groups. For example, in Caes.2, [C., F.] is the option to replace [D., G.]. It would be clear that the [D., G.] is disappeared because the two neighbors replace the function of [C., F.] well.
4-2-2a: Reference 4-2-2b: Support 4-2-2c: SupplyAfter deciding experimental groups, adding other densities into compared types would guide spatial features to be clear. For example, in Case.7, the proportion of [A., B.] can be adjusted to [B., C.] by the variation from extreme [I., J.] to relative rational [F., H.].
Adding one or two other densities can make a more beautiful proportion. In Case.5, group [C., F., H.] is fixed. Then adding [A., J., D., OP., and B.] is supports to modify proportion of group [C., F., H.]. In the compared options, added densities cannot provide any benefits, so it is clear that the original type in the case still is the best option.
What strategy is bold consideration? If having bold idea is an option, the work is to find out how to supply it to be rationalized. For example, in Case.6, group [A., J.] is the setting option. In the extreme urban form, supply of other densities would be useful to create other rational types. In the time, it would be easier to find an ideal type in the case.
Too EvenVlume
TooExtremeVlume
C. 10ha
C. 16ha
F. 14ha
The kindsofCatalystarefailed
It isfailedto addthecatalysts
600:800
400:2400
1400:1200
4000
1000
6000Theextremeconditionisstillexisted
Population3200vs4200
A huge area of single density is not the optionCase.2 [ D.G. -> C.F. ] Case.4 [ E. -> C.G. ]
E= 0 is successiful in the two last groups, and more even one is the optionCase.6 [ A.J. + ]
In the dramatic condition, rationalization is more important The massive J is not the option in any situationCase.8 [ J. + ]
Population
>>
>>
>
Case1.
Case2.
Case3.
Case4.
Case5.
Case6.
Fault
O.K
O.K
O.K
Designing density groups step by step, then they all follow the standard of density 10000 people/ 22ha to construct new density arrangement. From familiar city form to unfamiliar, how many city forms can be imagined? The most important question is that which city forms are ideal to recovery the local context of Lian-yun Block.
It is a traveling from Taipei city to others such as New York, Beijing, Mexico City, etc.
If setting the density group [D.E.G.] represents current Taipei city form and superimposes it into the current Lian-yun block: density 10000 people/ 22ha, we can realize the true current city form clearly.
4-2a: Step1 - Construct Formula 4-2b: Step2 - Discard [D., E., G.] 4-2c: Step3 - Pursue Diversity 4-2d: Step4 - Pursue Rationalization
It is notexisted inthe currentworld
TYP
E1
TYP
E4
TYP
E7
Team1.A.B.C.
x1
Team1.A.B.C.
x1
Team2.D.E.x18
Team3.F.G.x3
Team1.A.B.C.
x9
Team1.A.B.C.
x9
Team3.F.G.x13
Team1.A.B.C.
x14
Team1.A.B.C.
x14
Team3.F.G.x6
Team0.OP.A.
x4
Team0.OP.A.
x1
Team2.D.E.x12
Team4.H.I.J.
x2
Team0.OP.A.x10
Team0.OP.A.x10
Team2.D.E.x3
Team4.H.I.J.
x9
Team4.H.I.J.
x2
Team1.A.B.C.
x12
Team1.A.B.C.
x12
Team3.F.G.x8
Team4.H.I.J.
x2
Team1.A.B.C.
x11
Team1.A.B.C.
x11
Team1.A.B.C.
x10
Team3.F.G.x7
Team4.H.I.J.
x4
Team0.OP.A.
x7
Team0.OP.A.
x7
Team3.F.G.x14
Team4.H.I.J.
x1
Team1.A.B.C.
x10
Team3.F.G.x5
Team4.H.I.J.
x7
Team3.F.G.x4
4-3: 8 Types to 3 Types of Density Figure
4-3-1: Check the Proportion
The city form is not topology. Following topology idea, the eight cases can be separated into three kinds: The Hole, Balanceable M Shape Society (Population), and The
Backyard, but the classification is not useful to reconstruct a precise city form, so it must need a further step. Comparing their proportion in separate classification leads the
question: a relatively uneven population arrangement or relatively even city form, which one is more necessary for a new paradigm of Taipei city?
ps: the explanation of uneven population arrangement means that the 10000 people are separated into two part: low density area and high density area but they have near population as 4500 : 5500. The city form will be extreme as Type3.
4-3-2: Check the Arrangement
Transforming the density list to section, the arrangement leads other idea about the context of city form
(especially of Lian-yun Block). Arrangement from growth line to valley line makes meaningful variation that
compare which density is enough, suited, and even ideal density arrangement in an area of city form.
The density arrangement follows expected Lian-Yun Block context: Japanese Official Residences. If assuming the program only can be protected in the inside block, the arrangement from one side to the core to the other side= High density to low density and back to high density.
Density Arrangement 1 Density Arrangement 24-3a: The Hole – Type 1. 3. 8.What scale of an open park is enough in Lian-yun Block? If recovering context of Lian-yun block is the purpose, it is hard to allow huge open park that break the context.
The hole should be narrower because the lower density zone cannot be wasted just for massive garden. In this way,
Type1 is the first option in the classification.
4-3b: Balanceable M Shape Society – Type 4. 5.Choosing a more balanceable population arrangement and less even volume is appropriate in the classification because the future population moving between two parts will be easier in the condition. Even city form and uneven population arrangement never be the option.
Type4 is the best option in the classification.
4-3c: The Backyard – Type 2. 6. 7.Dislike the Hole, consideration of the amount of lower density group [A., B., C.] is necessary because it cannot cause a powerful pressure of higher density area nearby. Type6: larger space with low densituyrelatively waste too many spaces.
Type2: smaller space with lowdensity relatively too even for a new city form.
After abandoning above two types, Type7 is the ideal option in the classification.
Low Density : High Density 1000 : 9000
5: Activate the Programs - Program Resources of Lian- yun Block
The classic programs(Eight Elements)
T4 : 4200 : 5800T5 : 3600 : 6400
In the sector, the purpose of “activating the program” is to reconstruct the ideal operation of local programs and let the programs to appropriately match the density arrangements of Three Types from the 5-4.
Following the process [Eight Elements] > [Reprogramming] > [Add Amounts of the Programs] > [Add New Programs] > [Rearrange the status of eight Elements] of activating the program is useful to reach the purpose. Revealing a discussion about the roles of current programs is rational because we cannot change the form of the world completely.
What resources we own already? And how do we activate them again and let them working well with a new paradigm of city form? Recovery parts of Local Context, Reallocate the Location of Business and Parking Space, and Set the option of Open Park and Housing Space are all the ideas to design a new environment of Taipei City form.
TYP
E1
TYP
E4
TYP
E7
Team1.A.B.C.
x1
Team1.A.B.C.
x1
Team2.D.E.x18
Team3.F.G.x3
Team1.A.B.C.
x9
Team1.A.B.C.
x9
Team3.F.G.x13
Team1.A.B.C.
x14
Team1.A.B.C.
x14
Team3.F.G.x6
Team0.OP.A.
x4
Team0.OP.A.
x1
Team2.D.E.x12
Team4.H.I.J.
x2
Team0.OP.A.x10
Team0.OP.A.x10
Team2.D.E.x3
Team4.H.I.J.
x9
Team4.H.I.J.
x2
Team1.A.B.C.
x12
Team1.A.B.C.
x12
Team3.F.G.x8
Team4.H.I.J.
x2
Team1.A.B.C.
x11
Team1.A.B.C.
x11
Team1.A.B.C.
x10
Team3.F.G.x7
Team4.H.I.J.
x4
Team0.OP.A.
x7
Team0.OP.A.
x7
Team3.F.G.x14
Team4.H.I.J.
x1
Team1.A.B.C.
x10
Team3.F.G.x5
Team4.H.I.J.
x7
Team3.F.G.x4
4-3: 8 Types to 3 Types of Density Figure
4-3-1: Check the Proportion
The city form is not topology. Following topology idea, the eight cases can be separated into three kinds: The Hole, Balanceable M Shape Society (Population), and The
Backyard, but the classification is not useful to reconstruct a precise city form, so it must need a further step. Comparing their proportion in separate classification leads the
question: a relatively uneven population arrangement or relatively even city form, which one is more necessary for a new paradigm of Taipei city?
ps: the explanation of uneven population arrangement means that the 10000 people are separated into two part: low density area and high density area but they have near population as 4500 : 5500. The city form will be extreme as Type3.
4-3-2: Check the Arrangement
Transforming the density list to section, the arrangement leads other idea about the context of city form
(especially of Lian-yun Block). Arrangement from growth line to valley line makes meaningful variation that
compare which density is enough, suited, and even ideal density arrangement in an area of city form.
The density arrangement follows expected Lian-Yun Block context: Japanese Official Residences. If assuming the program only can be protected in the inside block, the arrangement from one side to the core to the other side= High density to low density and back to high density.
Density Arrangement 1 Density Arrangement 24-3a: The Hole – Type 1. 3. 8.What scale of an open park is enough in Lian-yun Block? If recovering context of Lian-yun block is the purpose, it is hard to allow huge open park that break the context.
The hole should be narrower because the lower density zone cannot be wasted just for massive garden. In this way,
Type1 is the first option in the classification.
4-3b: Balanceable M Shape Society – Type 4. 5.Choosing a more balanceable population arrangement and less even volume is appropriate in the classification because the future population moving between two parts will be easier in the condition. Even city form and uneven population arrangement never be the option.
Type4 is the best option in the classification.
4-3c: The Backyard – Type 2. 6. 7.Dislike the Hole, consideration of the amount of lower density group [A., B., C.] is necessary because it cannot cause a powerful pressure of higher density area nearby. Type6: larger space with low densituyrelatively waste too many spaces.
Type2: smaller space with lowdensity relatively too even for a new city form.
After abandoning above two types, Type7 is the ideal option in the classification.
Low Density : High Density 1000 : 9000
5: Activate the Programs - Program Resources of Lian- yun Block
The classic programs(Eight Elements)
T4 : 4200 : 5800T5 : 3600 : 6400
In the sector, the purpose of “activating the program” is to reconstruct the ideal operation of local programs and let the programs to appropriately match the density arrangements of Three Types from the 5-4.
Following the process [Eight Elements] > [Reprogramming] > [Add Amounts of the Programs] > [Add New Programs] > [Rearrange the status of eight Elements] of activating the program is useful to reach the purpose. Revealing a discussion about the roles of current programs is rational because we cannot change the form of the world completely.
What resources we own already? And how do we activate them again and let them working well with a new paradigm of city form? Recovery parts of Local Context, Reallocate the Location of Business and Parking Space, and Set the option of Open Park and Housing Space are all the ideas to design a new environment of Taipei City form.
Cr a
m S
ch
oo
l
T e m p l e
B a n k
W a t c hM o t o r
7 - 1 1
W e s t e r n M e d i c i n eB e a u t y C a r e
Sta
t io
ne
r y S
t or e
Je
we
r y
Dr y
Cl e
an
er s
Wa
t ch
Cl o
t hi n
g
De
nt i
st
Fo
od
C o n v e n i e n c e S t o r e
7 - 1 1
M e a t x 3
F a b r i c s s t o r e
Sa
l on
Br e
ak
f as
t
La
mb
ov
en
Ve
nd
or
W a t c h
Ma
rke
t x2
Fa
r m
Sa
l on
Ve
nd
or
Me
di c
i ne
B a n k
H e a l t h C a r e
p e d i a t r i c
Me
dic
ine
Cl i
ni c
Ba
nk
Ba
nk
Clo
thin
gBa
nk
C l o t h i n g
S a l o n
M e d i c i n e
B e a u t yC l o t h i n g
Ap
pli
an
ce
Ap
pl i
an
ce
C l o t h i n g
B r e a k f a s t
Dr y
Cl e
an
er s
Me
di c
i ne
C l o t h i n gt a e k w o n d oL a n d U s e
C r a m S c h o o lS p r i n g b e dP h o t o G a l l e r y
P o s t o f f i c e
Pro
pe
r ty
Ag
en
cy
Gr o
ce
r ie
sR
es
t au
r an
t
Cl o
t hi n
g
C r a m S c h o o l
F r u i t
P h o t o G a l l e r yD r y C l e a n e r s
b u f f e t 7 - 1 1F o o d
S h u S h iV e n d o r
J a p a n e s e F o o d
P r o p e r t y A g e n c yP r o p e r t y A g e n c y
P r o p e r t y A g e n c y
L a n g u a g eI n s t i t u t i o n
Gla
ss
es
Sh
op
Fu
r ni t
ur e
Ra
nt
Ho
us
e
V e n d o rD e c o r a t i o nD e c o r a t i o nD e p a r t m e n t S t o r e
F o o dV e n d o r sW a t e r
M e d i c i n e
F o o d
S e c o n d H a n d
Til
e
Se
cu
r it y
wi n
do
ws
Ki t
ch
en
wa
r e
T i l e
M o t oJ a p a n e s e F o o d
B u i l d i n g M a t e r i a l sB o u t i q u eB a t h r o o m E q u i p m e n t
T i l e
H o t e l
T i l e
M a i n t e n a n c eA u t o S t o r e sB o o k S t o r eW a t e rV e n d o rV e n d o r sB u i l d i n g M a t e r i a l s
A p p l i a n c e
Bo
uti
qu
e
Ch
ur c
h
SP
AC
l ot h
i ng
Re
st a
ur a
nt
Fu
r ni t
ur e
Fu
r ni t
ur e
P r o p e r t y A g e n c y
W a t e r
T e m p l eT
em
pl e
Ve
nd
or s
P a i n tW e s t e r n M e d i c i n eJ e w e l r y
J e w e l r y
V e n d o r s x 5
Se
cu
r it i
es
B a n k
Fa
br i
cs
st o
r e
Fu
r ni t
ur e
Me
di c
i ne
M
ar k
et x
3
Me
di c
i ne
Sa
l on
Fr u
i t
T e m p l e
J e w e l r y
Je
we
l ry
C l o t h i n g
Clo
t hi n
g
Cl o
t hi n
gC l o t h i n g
C a k e
Re
sta
ura
nt
C l i n i c
D e n t i s tC l i n i c
C o o p e r a t i v e
G l a s s e s S h o p
B r e a k f a s t
F o o dP a i n ta n t i q u e
B r e s k f a s t
P e t C a r e
P e tG a sB e a u t yY o g aK i t c h e n w a r e
V e n d o rF u r n i t u r e
S a l o n
P u b l i s h e rM a r t i a l A r t s M u s e u m
T e l e c o m
S a l o n B l o c k b u s t e r
W a s h h o u s e
C o f f e e
S a l o n
M e d i c i n e
P e t C a r eC l o t h i n g
F o o dM e n s ’ S u i tV e n d o rA q u a r i u mB r e a k f a s t
T e aV e n d o r
S h a b u s h a b uJ e w e l r yC h i n e s e M e d i c i n e
K i d sF o o d s h o p
S a l o nM a r t i a l A r t s M u s e u m
F o o d
D e c o r a t i o n
D e p a r t m e n tS a l o n
S a l o n
D e n t i s t
V e n d o rG O L F
H e a l t h C a r e
O l d C a r e
睡眠美學
D e n t i s tF l o w e r S h o p
D e c o r a t i o n
T e m p l e La
mb
ov
en
B e a u t yC l o t h i n g
Dr y
Cl e
an
er s
r y C
l ea
ne
r s
Me
di c
i ne
ed
i ci n
e
C r a m S c h o o l
Te
mp
l eV
en
do
r se
nd
or s
Me
di c
i ne
e
di c
i ne
M
ar k
et x
3
Cl o
t hi n
g
S a l o n
C o n s t r u c t i o n c o m p a n yA p p l i a n c e
D e c o r a t i o n
C o f f e e
Ba
nk
Ta
i la
nd
Fo
od
Pr o
pe
r ty
Ag
en
cy
Su
pe
r M
ar k
et
F o o d
R e s t a u r a n t
F l o w e r S h o p
PARK I NG
P A R K I N GPARK
I NG
P A R K I N G
P A R K I N G
P A R K I N G
P A R KP A R K
S u p e r M a r k e tC o n v e n i e n c e S t o r eT r a d i t i o n a l M a r k e tC h i n e s e R e s t a u r a n tF o r e i g n R e s t a u r a n tV e n d o r s
C l o t h i n gA c c e s s o r i e sO t h e r I t e m s
H o u s i n g a g e n c yH o m e I m p r o v e m e n t
E d u c a t i o n a lO f f i c e
A u t o & M o t o
A t h l e t i c sL e i s u r e
C h i n e s e C l i n i cW e s t e r n C l i n i c
O t h e r
P a r kT r e e
J a p a n e s e - S t y l eR e s i d e n c e s
P a r k i n g
0m100m
Japanese Official Residences
Japanese Official Residences
Japanese Official Residences
OldTrees
OldTrees
PARK I NG
OldTrees Old
Trees
OldTrees
North
Japanese Official Residences
Japanese Official Residences
5-1-1: 8 Elements of Lian- yun Block All Current Situation100%
Housing66%
Now
524 Building =
10000 people
Future
? Building [=] or [>]
10000 people
3.6444 ha Road + Path > 3.6444 ha
x 2
2079.7 m2 + 988 m2 = 3067 m2
[0] , [0.5] , [2] , [4] , [7] , [10] ha
41 Buildings = 5631 m2 41 Buildings + Yards = 11784 m2
3 Buildings = 450.2 m2
Flow
3 Buildings + Squares
= 450.2 m2 + ? m2
2.3118 ha 23117.6 m2 =21430.8 m2 + 1685.9 m2
Floor 1 Business Building
Level 3 = 23Level 2 = 67
Level 1 = 193
Level 3 Tree Square = 23 x 50.24 m2Level 2= 67Level 1 = 193
Floor 1 = 5514 m2
Prosonal Parkign Space = ? m2
Taipei City = 730000 mobiles / 2629269 peopleAverage 2778 mobiles / 10000 people-> Flow2778 mobiles = Floor 1 = 73500 m2 = Parking Tower 15265 m2
Road17%
Parking17% x 15%
Open Space17% x 8%
Old Trees17% x 0.1%
Shrines17% x 1%
JapaneseOfficial
Residences
17% x 15%
Vendors
Business17% x 61%
Program of AllNew Situation100%
Add Programof Activity
Others withoutBusiness39%
Others17%
Program of Housingsurplus%
Environment
Leisure
Generation
Gender
Kid
Old
Women
Program of Road17% +Path5%
Program of Others17% +8% [147%]
From 39%Up to 86%
Road 17%
Others17%
Road ? %
Others? %
Others25 %
Road 17%
Others17%
Path5%
Others17%
Business61%
Open Park 8%
JapaneseOfficial Residences15%
Housing66%
Housing66%
Housing? %
Housing? %
Housing66%
Paper / BottleRecycle Place
Wading PoolReading Room
Garden
Gathering PlaceReading Room
Reading Room
Basketball Court
Tennis Court
Kindergartion
Pleasure Ground
Child-Care Center
SandfieldKid School Way
Old Party
Woman Safe
Parking30%
JapaneseOfficialResidences30%
Japanese OfficialResidences15% x 2
4524
.7 m
2
3357
.7 m
2
5303
.9 m
2
1295
.7 m
2
2613
.4 m
2
1085
.1 m
2
450.
3 m
2
4486
.8 m
2
The parking space is not enough extremely, so using parking Tower is appropriate
The area of road system is increased but it mainly serves the pedestrian
Consideration of Building would be abandoned in new paradigm
Providing more kinds and different size of Open Park is flexible
The biggest trees provide the shadow areas that cotain activity
Business is not only happened at first floor
Housing53 %
In the quality and quantity, raising the standard that reaches the necessity of Lian-yun block in the future is necessary now. It needs more ideas and expectation to reach a better city form.On one hand, the standard will be useful to assist density arrangement of three Types in 4-3 (8 Types to 3 Types of Density Figure). On the other hand, it also will challenge the density arrangement because a new urban form that follows a new paradigm always accompanies its new programs. The contradiction would be fixed in next chapter.
5-1-2: Area Proportion of Current Programs
5-1-5: Area Proportion of Renewed Programs
5-1-4: Add quantity of the Programs
5-1-3: Current Program + Reprogramming
5-1-6: Add New Programs of ActivityEnvironment/ Generation/ Gender
If the expectation of more new programs is enhanced, fulfilling living quality of the community is reasonable choice. Moreover, the programs can be selected with different ideas. Who need to be cared is the question.
Quantity of the programs has risen without planning, so it is a chaotic situation now. A community always needs more open parks, trees, and parking spaces.
If inputting the increased spatial quantity into original space, the space cannot shoulder it in the traditional method. It provides a reason to find a new paradigm.
The proportion arrangement of the elements provides clear information to realize their status ranking. The variation of area proportion also can be checked clearly in the sector.
Measuring the area of current programs is simple, but if the program needs to follow a new paradigm, the way of assessment must be changed, too. First, the elements are not only units. Providing them the spatial quantity is useful to affect city form. Second, the regulation of area size is useful to purify the planning process.
Including the backyard of the traditional building is complete
The exclusive openspace for traditional activity
South
5-2: Operation of the 8 Elements5-1: Modification of the Eight Elements
Cr a
m S
ch
oo
l
T e m p l e
B a n k
W a t c hM o t o r
7 - 1 1
W e s t e r n M e d i c i n eB e a u t y C a r e
Sta
t io
ne
r y S
t or e
Je
we
r y
Dr y
Cl e
an
er s
Wa
t ch
Cl o
t hi n
g
De
nt i
st
Fo
od
C o n v e n i e n c e S t o r e
7 - 1 1
M e a t x 3
F a b r i c s s t o r e
Sa
l on
Br e
ak
f as
t
La
mb
ov
en
Ve
nd
or
W a t c h
Ma
rke
t x2
Fa
r m
Sa
l on
Ve
nd
or
Me
di c
i ne
B a n k
H e a l t h C a r e
p e d i a t r i c
Me
dic
ine
Cl i
ni c
Ba
nk
Ba
nk
Clo
thin
gBa
nk
C l o t h i n g
S a l o n
M e d i c i n e
B e a u t yC l o t h i n g
Ap
pli
an
ce
Ap
pl i
an
ce
C l o t h i n g
B r e a k f a s t
Dr y
Cl e
an
er s
Me
di c
i ne
C l o t h i n gt a e k w o n d oL a n d U s e
C r a m S c h o o lS p r i n g b e dP h o t o G a l l e r y
P o s t o f f i c e
Pro
pe
r ty
Ag
en
cy
Gr o
ce
r ie
sR
es
t au
r an
t
Cl o
t hi n
g
C r a m S c h o o l
F r u i t
P h o t o G a l l e r yD r y C l e a n e r s
b u f f e t 7 - 1 1F o o d
S h u S h iV e n d o r
J a p a n e s e F o o d
P r o p e r t y A g e n c yP r o p e r t y A g e n c y
P r o p e r t y A g e n c y
L a n g u a g eI n s t i t u t i o n
Gla
ss
es
Sh
op
Fu
r ni t
ur e
Ra
nt
Ho
us
e
V e n d o rD e c o r a t i o nD e c o r a t i o nD e p a r t m e n t S t o r e
F o o dV e n d o r sW a t e r
M e d i c i n e
F o o d
S e c o n d H a n d
Til
e
Se
cu
r it y
wi n
do
ws
Ki t
ch
en
wa
r e
T i l e
M o t oJ a p a n e s e F o o d
B u i l d i n g M a t e r i a l sB o u t i q u eB a t h r o o m E q u i p m e n t
T i l e
H o t e l
T i l e
M a i n t e n a n c eA u t o S t o r e sB o o k S t o r eW a t e rV e n d o rV e n d o r sB u i l d i n g M a t e r i a l s
A p p l i a n c e
Bo
uti
qu
e
Ch
ur c
h
SP
AC
l ot h
i ng
Re
st a
ur a
nt
Fu
r ni t
ur e
Fu
r ni t
ur e
P r o p e r t y A g e n c y
W a t e r
T e m p l e
Te
mp
l eV
en
do
r s
P a i n tW e s t e r n M e d i c i n eJ e w e l r y
J e w e l r y
V e n d o r s x 5
Se
cu
r it i
es
B a n k
Fa
br i
cs
st o
r e
Fu
r ni t
ur e
Me
di c
i ne
M
ar k
et x
3
Me
di c
i ne
Sa
l on
Fr u
i t
T e m p l e
J e w e l r y
Je
we
l ry
C l o t h i n g
Clo
t hi n
g
Cl o
t hi n
gC l o t h i n g
C a k e
Re
sta
ura
nt
C l i n i c
D e n t i s tC l i n i c
C o o p e r a t i v e
G l a s s e s S h o p
B r e a k f a s t
F o o dP a i n ta n t i q u e
B r e s k f a s t
P e t C a r e
P e tG a sB e a u t yY o g aK i t c h e n w a r e
V e n d o rF u r n i t u r e
S a l o n
P u b l i s h e rM a r t i a l A r t s M u s e u m
T e l e c o m
S a l o n B l o c k b u s t e r
W a s h h o u s e
C o f f e e
S a l o n
M e d i c i n e
P e t C a r eC l o t h i n g
F o o dM e n s ’ S u i tV e n d o rA q u a r i u mB r e a k f a s t
T e aV e n d o r
S h a b u s h a b uJ e w e l r yC h i n e s e M e d i c i n e
K i d sF o o d s h o p
S a l o nM a r t i a l A r t s M u s e u m
F o o d
D e c o r a t i o n
D e p a r t m e n tS a l o n
S a l o n
D e n t i s t
V e n d o rG O L F
H e a l t h C a r e
O l d C a r e
睡眠美學
D e n t i s tF l o w e r S h o p
D e c o r a t i o n
S a l o n
C o n s t r u c t i o n c o m p a n yA p p l i a n c e
D e c o r a t i o n
C o f f e e
Ba
nk
Ta
i la
nd
Fo
od
Pr o
pe
r ty
Ag
en
cy
Su
pe
r M
ar k
et
F o o d
R e s t a u r a n t
F l o w e r S h o p
PARK I NG
P A R K I N G
PARKI NG
P A R K I N G
P A R K I N G
P A R K I N G
P A R KP A R K
S u p e r M a r k e tC o n v e n i e n c e S t o r eT r a d i t i o n a l M a r k e tC h i n e s e R e s t a u r a n tF o r e i g n R e s t a u r a n tV e n d o r s
C l o t h i n gA c c e s s o r i e sO t h e r I t e m s
H o u s i n g a g e n c yH o m e I m p r o v e m e n t
E d u c a t i o n a lO f f i c e
A u t o & M o t o
A t h l e t i c sL e i s u r e
C h i n e s e C l i n i cW e s t e r n C l i n i c
O t h e r
P a r kT r e e
J a p a n e s e - S t y l eR e s i d e n c e s
P a r k i n g
0m100m
Japanese Official Residences
Japanese Official Residences
Japanese Official Residences
OldTrees
OldTrees
OldTrees Old
Trees
OldTrees
North
Japanese Official Residences
Japanese Official Residences
5-1-1: 8 Elements of Lian- yun Block All Current Situation100%
Housing66%
Now
524 Building =
10000 people
Future
? Building [=] or [>]
10000 people
3.6444 ha Road + Path > 3.6444 ha
x 2
2079.7 m2 + 988 m2 = 3067 m2
[0] , [0.5] , [2] , [4] , [7] , [10] ha
41 Buildings = 5631 m2 41 Buildings + Yards = 11784 m2
3 Buildings = 450.2 m2
Flow
3 Buildings + Squares
= 450.2 m2 + ? m2
2.3118 ha 23117.6 m2 =21430.8 m2 + 1685.9 m2
Floor 1 Business Building
Level 3 = 23Level 2 = 67
Level 1 = 193
Level 3 Tree Square = 23 x 50.24 m2Level 2= 67Level 1 = 193
Floor 1 = 5514 m2
Prosonal Parkign Space = ? m2
Taipei City = 730000 mobiles / 2629269 peopleAverage 2778 mobiles / 10000 people-> Flow2778 mobiles = Floor 1 = 73500 m2 = Parking Tower 15265 m2
Road17%
Parking17% x 15%
Open Space17% x 8%
Old Trees17% x 0.1%
Shrines17% x 1%
JapaneseOfficial
Residences
17% x 15%
Vendors
Business17% x 61%
Program of AllNew Situation100%
Add Programof Activity
Others withoutBusiness39%
Others17%
Program of Housingsurplus%
Environment
Leisure
Generation
Gender
Kid
Old
Women
Program of Road17% +Path5%
Program of Others17% +8% [147%]
From 39%Up to 86%
Road 17%
Others17%
Road ? %
Others? %
Others25 %
Road 17%
Others17%
Path5%
Others17%
Business61%
Open Park 8%
JapaneseOfficial Residences15%
Housing66%
Housing66%
Housing? %
Housing? %
Housing66%
Paper / BottleRecycle Place
Wading PoolReading Room
Garden
Gathering PlaceReading Room
Reading Room
Basketball Court
Tennis Court
Kindergartion
Pleasure Ground
Child-Care Center
SandfieldKid School Way
Old Party
Woman Safe
Parking30%
JapaneseOfficialResidences30%
Japanese OfficialResidences15% x 2
4524
.7 m
2
3357
.7 m
2
5303
.9 m
2
1295
.7 m
2
2613
.4 m
2
1085
.1 m
2
450.
3 m
2
4486
.8 m
2
The parking space is not enough extremely, so using parking Tower is appropriate
The area of road system is increased but it mainly serves the pedestrian
Consideration of Building would be abandoned in new paradigm
Providing more kinds and different size of Open Park is flexible
The biggest trees provide the shadow areas that cotain activity
Business is not only happened at first floor
Housing53 %
In the quality and quantity, raising the standard that reaches the necessity of Lian-yun block in the future is necessary now. It needs more ideas and expectation to reach a better city form.On one hand, the standard will be useful to assist density arrangement of three Types in 4-3 (8 Types to 3 Types of Density Figure). On the other hand, it also will challenge the density arrangement because a new urban form that follows a new paradigm always accompanies its new programs. The contradiction would be fixed in next chapter.
5-1-2: Area Proportion of Current Programs
5-1-5: Area Proportion of Renewed Programs
5-1-4: Add quantity of the Programs
5-1-3: Current Program + Reprogramming
5-1-6: Add New Programs of ActivityEnvironment/ Generation/ Gender
If the expectation of more new programs is enhanced, fulfilling living quality of the community is reasonable choice. Moreover, the programs can be selected with different ideas. Who need to be cared is the question.
Quantity of the programs has risen without planning, so it is a chaotic situation now. A community always needs more open parks, trees, and parking spaces.
If inputting the increased spatial quantity into original space, the space cannot shoulder it in the traditional method. It provides a reason to find a new paradigm.
The proportion arrangement of the elements provides clear information to realize their status ranking. The variation of area proportion also can be checked clearly in the sector.
Measuring the area of current programs is simple, but if the program needs to follow a new paradigm, the way of assessment must be changed, too. First, the elements are not only units. Providing them the spatial quantity is useful to affect city form. Second, the regulation of area size is useful to purify the planning process.
Including the backyard of the traditional building is complete
The exclusive openspace for traditional activity
South
5-2: Operation of the 8 Elements5-1: Modification of the Eight Elements
Basic Program
Program Program Program Program
Re - ZoningExistingSituation
Add Program
Basic Program
+ Existing Program
++ + +
- - - - -
+
Re - Zoning
Basic Program
Reprogramming
Basic Program
Reprogramming
Reprogramming
Add Program
Compared
Add New Program
In or Out
Quantity
Activation of Volume
Activation of Program
Quality
Allocation
New
JapaneseOfficialResidences
Step 1.Step 2. Step 3.Step 4. Step 5. Step 6. Step 7. Step 8.
5-2: Operation of the 8 Elements 5-2-2: Recovery the Context
5-2-2: Recovery the Context
5-2-1: Rearrange the Status of the 8 Elements
First, in the 5-2-1 (Recovery the Context), no any program form can be deleted. It is interesting to design the programs to be stronger roles and they would be practical to donate the community.
5-2-3: Allocation
Quantity of parking and business programs is fixed, but it is necessary to promote the quality. Changing their locations from chaos and wasteful situation is basic.
5-2-4a: Options 1 - Open Park
Third, after the operation of 5-2-1 and 5-2-2, only the surplus space can be used to be open park and building area. They cover most area in the community, but they also are the perfect selections to be the most passive roles in the eight element.
First, form of the two programs are flexible, the variation of urban can be expected because it provides more possibilities of housing estate. Second, the new paradigm provides new urban form.
5-2-4b: Options 2 - HousingSection 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4.
Arranging the designing process also needs designed. On one hand, the most conspicuous objects may not play the most important roles for a city development. On the other hand, the most inconspicuous objects may provide ideas and clues to challenge a city form. We need a new paradigm that cares regional history, and the history provides information that can be used to transform into Density, Program, and Volume. Following the idea, constructing a new city can be efficient and practical.
From current value to history context, traveling step by step, more questions are earned between them. What are the city’s troubles? And what we can reconsider? Maybe one thing covers massive area but no anyone cares such as Japanese Official Residences. They are weak and marginal, but they can be public property in current city and then own massive power to accommodate useful programs. Moreover, they are the key to assess the community’s possible density; it is possible to recovery the context with the Japanese Official Residences in the modern world.
Housing Parking RoadOpen ParkBusiness JapaneseOfficialResidences
Shrines Old Trees
Housing Parking RoadOpen ParkBusinessJapaneseOfficialResidences
ShrinesOld Trees
HousingParkingRoad Open Park BusinessJapaneseOfficialResidences
ShrinesOld Trees
HousingParkingRoad Open ParkBusinessJapaneseOfficialResidences
ShrinesOld Trees
Housing Parking Road Open Park Business JapaneseOfficialResidences
Shrines Old Trees
Housing145000m2
Parking5514m2+
Road36444m2
Open Park3067m2
Business23118m2
JapaneseOfficialResidences5631m2
Shrines450.2m2
Old Trees? m2More Area
More Substantial
Private
Past
Primary
Less Area
Less Unsubstantial
Public
Now
Last
Step 1.
Step 2.More Necessary Less Necessary
Step 3.
Step 4.
Step 5.
Step 6.
Step 1.
Step 2.
Step 3.
Step 4.
Step 5.
Step 6.
1. 2. 3.
1. 2. 3.
1. 2. 3.
1. 1. 1.
1. 2. 2.
1. 2. 3.
4. 5.
4.
4.
5.
4. 4.
6.
6.
5. 6.
7. 8.
6. 6. 6.
7. 8.
7. 8.
4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
Basic Program
Program Program Program Program
Re - ZoningExistingSituation
Add Program
Basic Program
+ Existing Program
++ + +
- - - - -
+
Re - Zoning
Basic Program
Reprogramming
Basic Program
Reprogramming
Reprogramming
Add Program
Compared
Add New Program
In or Out
Quantity
Activation of Volume
Activation of Program
Quality
Allocation
New
JapaneseOfficialResidences
Step 1.Step 2. Step 3.Step 4. Step 5. Step 6. Step 7. Step 8.
5-2: Operation of the 8 Elements 5-2-2: Recovery the Context
5-2-2: Recovery the Context
5-2-1: Rearrange the Status of the 8 Elements
First, in the 5-2-1 (Recovery the Context), no any program form can be deleted. It is interesting to design the programs to be stronger roles and they would be practical to donate the community.
5-2-3: Allocation
Quantity of parking and business programs is fixed, but it is necessary to promote the quality. Changing their locations from chaos and wasteful situation is basic.
5-2-4a: Options 1 - Open Park
Third, after the operation of 5-2-1 and 5-2-2, only the surplus space can be used to be open park and building area. They cover most area in the community, but they also are the perfect selections to be the most passive roles in the eight element.
First, form of the two programs are flexible, the variation of urban can be expected because it provides more possibilities of housing estate. Second, the new paradigm provides new urban form.
5-2-4b: Options 2 - HousingSection 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4.
Arranging the designing process also needs designed. On one hand, the most conspicuous objects may not play the most important roles for a city development. On the other hand, the most inconspicuous objects may provide ideas and clues to challenge a city form. We need a new paradigm that cares regional history, and the history provides information that can be used to transform into Density, Program, and Volume. Following the idea, constructing a new city can be efficient and practical.
From current value to history context, traveling step by step, more questions are earned between them. What are the city’s troubles? And what we can reconsider? Maybe one thing covers massive area but no anyone cares such as Japanese Official Residences. They are weak and marginal, but they can be public property in current city and then own massive power to accommodate useful programs. Moreover, they are the key to assess the community’s possible density; it is possible to recovery the context with the Japanese Official Residences in the modern world.
Housing Parking RoadOpen ParkBusiness JapaneseOfficialResidences
Shrines Old Trees
Housing Parking RoadOpen ParkBusinessJapaneseOfficialResidences
ShrinesOld Trees
HousingParkingRoad Open Park BusinessJapaneseOfficialResidences
ShrinesOld Trees
HousingParkingRoad Open ParkBusinessJapaneseOfficialResidences
ShrinesOld Trees
Housing Parking Road Open Park Business JapaneseOfficialResidences
Shrines Old Trees
Housing145000m2
Parking5514m2+
Road36444m2
Open Park3067m2
Business23118m2
JapaneseOfficialResidences5631m2
Shrines450.2m2
Old Trees? m2More Area
More Substantial
Private
Past
Primary
Less Area
Less Unsubstantial
Public
Now
Last
Step 1.
Step 2.More Necessary Less Necessary
Step 3.
Step 4.
Step 5.
Step 6.
Step 1.
Step 2.
Step 3.
Step 4.
Step 5.
Step 6.
1. 2. 3.
1. 2. 3.
1. 2. 3.
1. 1. 1.
1. 2. 2.
1. 2. 3.
4. 5.
4.
4.
5.
4. 4.
6.
6.
5. 6.
7. 8.
6. 6. 6.
7. 8.
7. 8.
4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
Add New Program A. x 28 Kindergarten x 4
Pleasure Ground x 4
Child-Care Center x 4
Reading Room x 6
Gathering Place x 6
Paper/Bottle Recycle Place x 4
Basic Program Reprogramming Add Program
Comparison New Program
Old Trees that lean Japanese Official Residences are the primary choices to set public spaces
5-2-2a: Road System[Extend the Road]
[Private to Public]
[Periphery to Circus]
[Connection + Square]
The current road system is circuitous and inefficient. Following the current road direction, extending roads cut across housing space. They are the pedestrian areas that deny mobiles.
5-2-2b: Japanese Official Residences
The selected residences match the requirement of 5-1-6 (Add new programs), the small size of public interiors can be used for different program such as small reading room or even the gathering space. Furthermore, it can be the rational reason to renovate the old houses.
Is it possible that connection of the road by the Japanese official residences can show past experience of streets: the skyline with low density region? The idea will be finished in 5-2-4b (Options: Housing).
5-2-2c: Old Trees
The space of tree can be decided for any size, and different size lead different function, from absorbing CO2 to gathering people. They are the public property and the stops of path from core to margin. The new kind of road system is independent for pedestrians. Following the road system, it will be easy to arrive adding new programs in the community.
5-2-2d: Shrines
Shrines afford the activity for traditional festival. The squares of shrines are prepared for that. Meanwhile, making sure the road that connects the two shrines is clear.
The new functions of the residences satify part of programs from 5-1-6 (Add New Programs of Activity). It is rational that they are allocated evenly in the block.
How many residences need to transform? The quantity ofnew programs is decided by the walking time of pedestrians. Time of walking for one minute is more appropriate than 30sec or 90sec.
They are also the functions that are part of 5-1-6 (Add New Programs of Activity). The short cut for women to the main two market and children to the schoold nearby. Olds also can use the path to someopen park.
keep 13 / 41
New Square
Section 1
Step 1. Step 2.
Basic Program Reprogramming Step 1. Step 2.
Step 3.
Step 4.
The programs still stay there, but they can be powerful to assist the necessity of the community. It means that the tiniest units in Lian-yun Block become the positive role. Saving the block from chaos road system is workable and the idea makes sure that the pedestrians have the enough space that is safe, convenient, open, and relax.
5-2-3: Operation 2 - Allocation5-2-2: Operation 1 - Recovery the Context
Add New Program A. x 28 Kindergarten x 4
Pleasure Ground x 4
Child-Care Center x 4
Reading Room x 6
Gathering Place x 6
Paper/Bottle Recycle Place x 4
Basic Program Reprogramming Add Program
Comparison New Program
Old Trees that lean Japanese Official Residences are the primary choices to set public spaces
5-2-2a: Road System[Extend the Road]
[Private to Public]
[Periphery to Circus]
[Connection + Square]
The current road system is circuitous and inefficient. Following the current road direction, extending roads cut across housing space. They are the pedestrian areas that deny mobiles.
5-2-2b: Japanese Official Residences
The selected residences match the requirement of 5-1-6 (Add new programs), the small size of public interiors can be used for different program such as small reading room or even the gathering space. Furthermore, it can be the rational reason to renovate the old houses.
Is it possible that connection of the road by the Japanese official residences can show past experience of streets: the skyline with low density region? The idea will be finished in 5-2-4b (Options: Housing).
5-2-2c: Old Trees
The space of tree can be decided for any size, and different size lead different function, from absorbing CO2 to gathering people. They are the public property and the stops of path from core to margin. The new kind of road system is independent for pedestrians. Following the road system, it will be easy to arrive adding new programs in the community.
5-2-2d: Shrines
Shrines afford the activity for traditional festival. The squares of shrines are prepared for that. Meanwhile, making sure the road that connects the two shrines is clear.
The new functions of the residences satify part of programs from 5-1-6 (Add New Programs of Activity). It is rational that they are allocated evenly in the block.
How many residences need to transform? The quantity ofnew programs is decided by the walking time of pedestrians. Time of walking for one minute is more appropriate than 30sec or 90sec.
They are also the functions that are part of 5-1-6 (Add New Programs of Activity). The short cut for women to the main two market and children to the schoold nearby. Olds also can use the path to someopen park.
keep 13 / 41
New Square
Section 1
Step 1. Step 2.
Basic Program Reprogramming Step 1. Step 2.
Step 3.
Step 4.
The programs still stay there, but they can be powerful to assist the necessity of the community. It means that the tiniest units in Lian-yun Block become the positive role. Saving the block from chaos road system is workable and the idea makes sure that the pedestrians have the enough space that is safe, convenient, open, and relax.
5-2-3: Operation 2 - Allocation5-2-2: Operation 1 - Recovery the Context
Basic Program Reprogramming
In or Out Allocation
[Chaos]
[Chaos] ? ?
[Concentration]
[Scatteration]
Two Markets
The two programs’ problem is that their arrangements of location are chaos and less planning. It is hard to find out appropriate allocation of the stores and parking spaces in current paradigm. No people can obtain benefit from the situation, only creating congested traffic in a limit area. It is a community and a block. Reallocating the two programs with new paradigm is necessary. No any store and parking space would be decreased to face the new condition.
5-2-3a: Business
In the Taipei city, the location of stores is mixed, no rule. Every independent store only chooses the site for benefit that they expect. However, is it true that the site is well for different stores? In fact, many stores are failed for their site so it is easy to see the open or close of many independent stores in Taipei. It has reason why some stores are suited to concentrate or scatter.
The principle from 5-1 (Modification of Elements) is the idea how to input the stores. It cares the location not only for concentrated market but also for individual stores. Keeping continuous street experience for market would stimulate the local shopping.
5-2-3b: Parking Space
Lack of Parking Spaces is almost every big city’s problems. The problem can be solved by well planning as mature public traffic system. But if people cannot dispose to rely on mobiles, it still has chance to fix the problem in an 22ha area. The block is a community, from outside to inside, decreasing the chance to drive cars into the deep region of the block. Parking Towers are constructed near the margin of block, but it is not enough. The massive public underground parking spaces is needed.
Basic Program Reprogramming
Existing Situation
Rezoning
The idea from the 5-1-3
Reprogramming
Section 2
to Section 1
The new allocation of storesconcentrates two mainmarkets. The other one ofcontinuous stores to connect the two markets.Surplus stores lean the margin of block.
The current allocation of stores is chaos clearly.The cloud profile showsthe relationship of stores.
It is no relationship between road direction and open parking spaces in the block. The currentparadigm of parking do not have responsibilityto care the safety of pedestrians.
The original idea of parkingis to divide the block intoinside and out side, but where is the border?Following the new businessarrangement is workableto decide the new border.
The publicunderground parkingspace is used for localmasses. The publicParking Tower can betemporary parkingin the block.
The surplus expected30% parking space inthe inside is rational.It will be hard to seemobiles in the regionif we accept newparking paradigm.
[Concentration or Scatteration]
[Parking Location]
Step 1. Step 2.
Step 2.
Step 1. Step 2.
5-2-4a: Operation 3 - Options 1 - Open Park5-2-3: Operation 2 - Allocation
Basic Program Reprogramming
In or Out Allocation
[Chaos]
[Chaos] ? ?
[Concentration]
[Scatteration]
Two Markets
The two programs’ problem is that their arrangements of location are chaos and less planning. It is hard to find out appropriate allocation of the stores and parking spaces in current paradigm. No people can obtain benefit from the situation, only creating congested traffic in a limit area. It is a community and a block. Reallocating the two programs with new paradigm is necessary. No any store and parking space would be decreased to face the new condition.
5-2-3a: Business
In the Taipei city, the location of stores is mixed, no rule. Every independent store only chooses the site for benefit that they expect. However, is it true that the site is well for different stores? In fact, many stores are failed for their site so it is easy to see the open or close of many independent stores in Taipei. It has reason why some stores are suited to concentrate or scatter.
The principle from 5-1 (Modification of Elements) is the idea how to input the stores. It cares the location not only for concentrated market but also for individual stores. Keeping continuous street experience for market would stimulate the local shopping.
5-2-3b: Parking Space
Lack of Parking Spaces is almost every big city’s problems. The problem can be solved by well planning as mature public traffic system. But if people cannot dispose to rely on mobiles, it still has chance to fix the problem in an 22ha area. The block is a community, from outside to inside, decreasing the chance to drive cars into the deep region of the block. Parking Towers are constructed near the margin of block, but it is not enough. The massive public underground parking spaces is needed.
Basic Program Reprogramming
Existing Situation
Rezoning
The idea from the 5-1-3
Reprogramming
Section 2
to Section 1
The new allocation of storesconcentrates two mainmarkets. The other one ofcontinuous stores to connect the two markets.Surplus stores lean the margin of block.
The current allocation of stores is chaos clearly.The cloud profile showsthe relationship of stores.
It is no relationship between road direction and open parking spaces in the block. The currentparadigm of parking do not have responsibilityto care the safety of pedestrians.
The original idea of parkingis to divide the block intoinside and out side, but where is the border?Following the new businessarrangement is workableto decide the new border.
The publicunderground parkingspace is used for localmasses. The publicParking Tower can betemporary parkingin the block.
The surplus expected30% parking space inthe inside is rational.It will be hard to seemobiles in the regionif we accept newparking paradigm.
[Concentration or Scatteration]
[Parking Location]
Step 1. Step 2.
Step 2.
Step 1. Step 2.
5-2-4a: Operation 3 - Options 1 - Open Park5-2-3: Operation 2 - Allocation
Reprogramming Add Program
+ Japanese Official Residences
+ Road System
+ Old Trees
+ Business
Add New Program B. Wading Pool x 21
Garden 23853 m2
Add New Program C. Vendors x random
Sport x 8
Play Ground x 4
Sandfield x 7
After the operation of the 5-2-2 (Recovery the context) and the 5-2-3 (Allocation), the surplus area will be arranged to be substantial housing space or unsubstantial open space. The main two parts of city form face the problem and also the chance to match the new paradigms of above six elements. In the section, if the form of open park is arranged by the street experience of Japanese official residences independently (The lowest density area of Lian-yun Block is the only choice to match none density area), is it possible to match other elements well? Following the presentation is clear to realize that what size of open park is appropriate.
Basic ProgramStep 1.
+ Existing Program Step 2.
ReprogrammingComparison Step 3. Add Program
> Add New Program B.
> Add New Program C.
Step 4.
5-2-4a: Open Park
2ha ~ 2.5 ha Open Park 4ha ~ 4.5 ha Open Park 7ha ~ 7.5 ha Open Park 10ha ~ 10.5ha Open Park
2ha ~ 2.5 ha Open Park 4ha ~ 4.5 ha Open Park 7ha ~ 7.5 ha Open Park 10ha ~ 10.5ha Open Park
Different size of Open Park would make different environment performance. On the other words, connecting the 5-2-2 (Recovery the context) smallest units as Japanese official residences, old trees, shrines, and road system, it would lead different method to manage the open space. The question is: Does it need an enormous Open Park in Lian-yun Block? It is beautiful but cannot match the local context. In the 10ha open park, the road system is not road system, and the allocation of stores look like a temporary market. Moreover, it causes extremely congested living space. The region still needs to cover part of density pressure. The relationship between massive open park and high tower of living space is imaginable easily, so the consideration is disposed in the next chapter. In this way, comparison of different size of open park, the 3.5ha of Open Park is the limit of tolerance in the 22ha block.
If the massive open park is workable, it will be easy to input different kinds of sport courts and play ground. Following the variation of size ofthe open park, the quantity of facilities also ischanged.No matter what size it is, the continuous open parkin Lian-yun block will connect the Da-an Forest park from westnorth.
From tiny park to valleyto enormous park, theliving density of population of surplus areaalso is increased dramatically.
The massive open park maydestroys the road system.The narrow widthof surplus roads cannot support the necessity of parking
It is a contradiction betweenthe above road system and the old trees. The massivepark is perfectly match thetrees, so how many treesare protected is a question.
The stores are located in thepark is interesting , but theywould look like temporarymarket. The continuousrelationship of stores isbroken possibly.
They are the basic programs for the backyard of Japanese official residences, soit is not affected by the size of open park.The original open park is larger than 2ha in 22ha.
> 10ha Open Park> 2ha Open Park
The new functions of the open park satify part of programs from 5-1-6(Add New Programs of Activity).
to Section 2
Section 3
[Rematch the Programs]
Step 3. Step 4.
5-2-4b: Operation 4 - Options of Housing5-2-4a: Operation 3 - Options of Open Park
Reprogramming Add Program
+ Japanese Official Residences
+ Road System
+ Old Trees
+ Business
Add New Program B. Wading Pool x 21
Garden 23853 m2
Add New Program C. Vendors x random
Sport x 8
Play Ground x 4
Sandfield x 7
After the operation of the 5-2-2 (Recovery the context) and the 5-2-3 (Allocation), the surplus area will be arranged to be substantial housing space or unsubstantial open space. The main two parts of city form face the problem and also the chance to match the new paradigms of above six elements. In the section, if the form of open park is arranged by the street experience of Japanese official residences independently (The lowest density area of Lian-yun Block is the only choice to match none density area), is it possible to match other elements well? Following the presentation is clear to realize that what size of open park is appropriate.
Basic ProgramStep 1.
+ Existing Program Step 2.
ReprogrammingComparison Step 3. Add Program
> Add New Program B.
> Add New Program C.
Step 4.
5-2-4a: Open Park
2ha ~ 2.5 ha Open Park 4ha ~ 4.5 ha Open Park 7ha ~ 7.5 ha Open Park 10ha ~ 10.5ha Open Park
2ha ~ 2.5 ha Open Park 4ha ~ 4.5 ha Open Park 7ha ~ 7.5 ha Open Park 10ha ~ 10.5ha Open Park
Different size of Open Park would make different environment performance. On the other words, connecting the 5-2-2 (Recovery the context) smallest units as Japanese official residences, old trees, shrines, and road system, it would lead different method to manage the open space. The question is: Does it need an enormous Open Park in Lian-yun Block? It is beautiful but cannot match the local context. In the 10ha open park, the road system is not road system, and the allocation of stores look like a temporary market. Moreover, it causes extremely congested living space. The region still needs to cover part of density pressure. The relationship between massive open park and high tower of living space is imaginable easily, so the consideration is disposed in the next chapter. In this way, comparison of different size of open park, the 3.5ha of Open Park is the limit of tolerance in the 22ha block.
If the massive open park is workable, it will be easy to input different kinds of sport courts and play ground. Following the variation of size ofthe open park, the quantity of facilities also ischanged.No matter what size it is, the continuous open parkin Lian-yun block will connect the Da-an Forest park from westnorth.
From tiny park to valleyto enormous park, theliving density of population of surplus areaalso is increased dramatically.
The massive open park maydestroys the road system.The narrow widthof surplus roads cannot support the necessity of parking
It is a contradiction betweenthe above road system and the old trees. The massivepark is perfectly match thetrees, so how many treesare protected is a question.
The stores are located in thepark is interesting , but theywould look like temporarymarket. The continuousrelationship of stores isbroken possibly.
They are the basic programs for the backyard of Japanese official residences, soit is not affected by the size of open park.The original open park is larger than 2ha in 22ha.
> 10ha Open Park> 2ha Open Park
The new functions of the open park satify part of programs from 5-1-6(Add New Programs of Activity).
to Section 2
Section 3
[Rematch the Programs]
Step 3. Step 4.
5-2-4b: Operation 4 - Options of Housing5-2-4a: Operation 3 - Options of Open Park
Basic Program Reprogramming
Basic Program Reprogramming
Amplification:The Methodof DensityArrangement
Quantity
Quantity
Quality
Quality
The FormingStreetExperience
Using theCadastralMap toArrangeDensityLevel
From the expected lowdensity areato the expectedhigh densityarea
IncreasedAreaFrom theAboveDensityArrangement
Mix. - 183600.6m2
Massive Surface
Level 6. - 62763.2m2Level 5. - 36601m2Level 4. - 38776.8m2Level 3 . - 15549.8m2Level 2. - 18125.8m2Level 1. - 11784m2Level 0. - 5631.4m2
18.4ha6.3ha3.7ha3.9ha1.6ha1.8ha1.2ha0.6ha
+Level 6. - 183600.6m2+Level 5. - 120837.4m2+Level 4. - 84236.4m2+Level 3 . - 45459.6m2+Level 2. - 29909.8m2+Level 1. - 11784m2Level 0. - 5631.4m2
SurfaceStripCakePoint
Japanese OfficialStep 1. Residences
Housing
Cadastral Map
Complete Surface
Step 2. Surface
No Japanese OfficialResidences
Step 1.
No 7ha Open Park
No Business
No Space of Old Treesand Shrines
No Road System
After the operation of independent Open Park, the last step of operation is inputting the enormous substantial housing space into surplus Lian-yun block. It is important to find a way to transform the living space of 10000 people into volume and then arrange the volume into surplus spaces.
But in the section, the designed arrangement is firstly finished than transformation between density and volume because the diagram of program is operated well to solve the question.
Matching the cadastral map and the sites of Japanese official residences is useful to be an idea of density arrangement.
5-2-4b: Housing[Allocate the Surplus Area]The section represents density arrangement of housing. The first step is finding out where can be inputted above programs, and the surplus space would be arranged different density to be housing space. But what rule can be used to be the paradigm of housing arrangement for surplus area?
Following the 5-2-2 (Recovery the context), the Japanese Official Residences represent the lowest housing density and the existed context of Lian-yun Block. The possibility of the context can be transformed into Volume arrangement. Recovering the skyline (also the Density) of past context would be operated in part of the Block. It is the form of New Paradigm, an idea of FAR arrangement. Lian-yun Block can reach the expectation of the 4-3 (8 Types to 3 Types of Density Figure). Owing a backyard or well open park is possible.
Step 0.
Step 3.
Step 4.
Step 2.
Level 5. Level 6.Level 4.Level 3.Level 2.Level 1.
Section 4
to Section 3
The concept of density arrangementcan not only allocate the densitylevel of housing but also constructthe continuous street experience (Skyline Assessment in the 6-4-3)
In the area of 22ha, the method of density arrangement is rational because the independent housing space can bethe smallest unit well, providing the variation of local fighue ground.
Following the concept of density arrangement, the quanitity of every level needs to be assessed. In the low density area, it needs more details to match local context of Lian-yun block.
Step 3. Extension Step 5. Mirror Step 6. FillStep 4. Connection
Step 1. Step 2.
Step 1. Step 2.
6: Activate the Volume5-2-4b: Operation 4 - Options of Housing
0.6ha 3.0ha1.2ha 18.4ha12.1ha8.5ha4.5ha
Basic Program Reprogramming
Basic Program Reprogramming
Amplification:The Methodof DensityArrangement
Quantity
Quantity
Quality
Quality
The FormingStreetExperience
Using theCadastralMap toArrangeDensityLevel
From the expected lowdensity areato the expectedhigh densityarea
IncreasedAreaFrom theAboveDensityArrangement
Mix. - 183600.6m2
Massive Surface
Level 6. - 62763.2m2Level 5. - 36601m2Level 4. - 38776.8m2Level 3 . - 15549.8m2Level 2. - 18125.8m2Level 1. - 11784m2Level 0. - 5631.4m2
18.4ha6.3ha3.7ha3.9ha1.6ha1.8ha1.2ha0.6ha
+Level 6. - 183600.6m2+Level 5. - 120837.4m2+Level 4. - 84236.4m2+Level 3 . - 45459.6m2+Level 2. - 29909.8m2+Level 1. - 11784m2Level 0. - 5631.4m2
SurfaceStripCakePoint
Japanese OfficialStep 1. Residences
Housing
Cadastral Map
Complete Surface
Step 2. Surface
No Japanese OfficialResidences
Step 1.
No 7ha Open Park
No Business
No Space of Old Treesand Shrines
No Road System
After the operation of independent Open Park, the last step of operation is inputting the enormous substantial housing space into surplus Lian-yun block. It is important to find a way to transform the living space of 10000 people into volume and then arrange the volume into surplus spaces.
But in the section, the designed arrangement is firstly finished than transformation between density and volume because the diagram of program is operated well to solve the question.
Matching the cadastral map and the sites of Japanese official residences is useful to be an idea of density arrangement.
5-2-4b: Housing[Allocate the Surplus Area]The section represents density arrangement of housing. The first step is finding out where can be inputted above programs, and the surplus space would be arranged different density to be housing space. But what rule can be used to be the paradigm of housing arrangement for surplus area?
Following the 5-2-2 (Recovery the context), the Japanese Official Residences represent the lowest housing density and the existed context of Lian-yun Block. The possibility of the context can be transformed into Volume arrangement. Recovering the skyline (also the Density) of past context would be operated in part of the Block. It is the form of New Paradigm, an idea of FAR arrangement. Lian-yun Block can reach the expectation of the 4-3 (8 Types to 3 Types of Density Figure). Owing a backyard or well open park is possible.
Step 0.
Step 3.
Step 4.
Step 2.
Level 5. Level 6.Level 4.Level 3.Level 2.Level 1.
Section 4
to Section 3
The concept of density arrangementcan not only allocate the densitylevel of housing but also constructthe continuous street experience (Skyline Assessment in the 6-4-3)
In the area of 22ha, the method of density arrangement is rational because the independent housing space can bethe smallest unit well, providing the variation of local fighue ground.
Following the concept of density arrangement, the quanitity of every level needs to be assessed. In the low density area, it needs more details to match local context of Lian-yun block.
Step 3. Extension Step 5. Mirror Step 6. FillStep 4. Connection
Step 1. Step 2.
Step 1. Step 2.
6: Activate the Volume5-2-4b: Operation 4 - Options of Housing
0.6ha 3.0ha1.2ha 18.4ha12.1ha8.5ha4.5ha
6-1: Form the 5-2 Elements to 3D Volume 6-2: 8 Elements x 3 Types = 3 City Models
Extruded Road System
Extend the Road
Private to Public
Abstracted Volume 1Whole Volume10000people/ 22ha
Inputted New Stores Arrangement
Inputted Current Stores Arrangement
Inputted Parking TowersInputted Current Parking
Mixed Volume 1
Mixed Volume 2
Inputted JapaneseOfficial Residences
Extruded JapaneseOfficial Residences Abstracted Volume 3
Extruded Path Abstracted Volume 2
Step 3.
The path system from core to margin provides safe shortcuts for olds, women, and childrens.
The backyards of Residences are the basic open space of the new paradigm.
The basic short cut would fix part of thetraffic problem. It is only for pedestrians.
Forming the six reprogrammed elements (except open park and housing) is a mission in the stage. It decides where cannot input open space and housing. The idea can be divided into two parts: firstly, the idea transforms the unsubstantial elements (such as road system) to substantial volume to decide where the open space is. Secondly, the other idea forms the substantial space that has other function such as Parking Tower and Business.
6-1b: Input the 5-2-2 (Recovery the Context)The reprogrammed elements from the 5-2-2 (Recovery the context) are operated into Volume that decides the no housing area. Height of the volume is unlimited so it means that the principle of skyline is finished but the outline of it still is dynamic in different city form. It decides the quality of open space and density arrangement. The forms of surplus volume are living space of 10000people/ 22ha. The quantity of volumes is fixed in the process and they are operated with the idea from 6-2-4b(Options of Housing). The variation of spaces is activated from an even height arrangement. The condition is the principle of “Three Types Cities” in the next sector.
6-1c: Input the 5-2-3 (Allocation)In the end, inputting the 5-2-3 (Allocation) parking spaces and business into right locations that follow the ideas with concentration or scatteration, where can be inputted housing space is clear in the 3D model. The relationship between them also can be assessed precisely.
Step 7.
Step 8.
Current Situation Surplus VolumeNo Housing Volume
Step 4.
Step 5.
Abstracted Volume 5
Abstracted Volume 4Extruded Old Trees AreaPeriphery to Circus
Extruded Shrines + Squares
Connection + Square
Inputted Old Trees
Inputted Shrines
All Extruded Volume
Past City - 1940 - The View of Northeast
Current City - 2008 - The View of Northeast
Existing Three Elements - The View of Northeast
Shrine
Japanese Official Residences + Old TreesIf we ignore the current housing area, the lacations of two elements are scattered roughly from northwest to southwest in the block.
Activation of the Volume is the last sector of D.P.V. City, and it follows the Density arrangement from the chapter4 and the Program Ideas from the chapter 5.
The most important mission of chapter6 is to assess the possibility of forming a new paradigm. Is it true that the way of designing process is effective or not? Is it true that separating the structure to different sectors (Density, Program, and Volume) of city form still work and, most importantly, it work well?
The chapter can be separate into two main parts: Forming the 8 elements of programs and 3 Types of density and inspection of the results (There have three cities).
6a: The New Paradigm
The new paradigm of city form offers opinions of the Taipei city. It still can change in the future no matter how many years is needed. Constructing a new city in a same location with twenty years to fifty years is not so long because it still stays in a generation. In fact, the purposes of the new paradigm not only adjust density arrangement and programs allocation but also recovery the context of Lian-yun Block.
6-1a: 1940, 2008, and [? + elements]Forming the past and current Lian-yun Block into the 3D graphic Volume is the first step to activate the Volume Sector.
It is clear that the two city forms follow completely different paradigms on the same land. It is also clear that the relationship between the form of assumed 1940 village and the form of true 2008 Taipei city is weak and chaos. It is hard to make sure the context of history when we travel in the current environment. The context of Lian-yun block is already researched in Chapter 3 (The Sampling of Experiment) and it is only existed there. The first step to form new paradigm is forming the heritages (the 41 Japanese Official Residences, the 283 Old Trees, and the two Shrines) that are reprogrammed at the 5-2-2 (Recovery the context) and then match the demands of a new Lian-yun Block.
6b: Representative of Taipei
The designed results of new cities are not the true conclusion, but the whole process of operation of the D.P.V. City is. It can be a new paradigm to operate the transformation of every block in Taipei city. The forms of blocks are possibly different but the city can be arranged well in the future when it follows the new paradigm of urban planning of Taipei.
ParkingSpace
OpenPark
OpenPark
ParkingSpace
1930 The form of Taipei city
6: Activate the Volume - Form the D.P.V. City
Step 2.
Step 1.
The mixed volume is all unconstructed . It also decides thenew skylinec of the block with the new paradigm.
The Paradigm
6-1: Form the 5-2 Elements to 3D Volume 6-2: 8 Elements x 3 Types = 3 City Models
Extruded Road System
Extend the Road
Private to Public
Abstracted Volume 1Whole Volume10000people/ 22ha
Inputted New Stores Arrangement
Inputted Current Stores Arrangement
Inputted Parking TowersInputted Current Parking
Mixed Volume 1
Mixed Volume 2
Inputted JapaneseOfficial Residences
Extruded JapaneseOfficial Residences Abstracted Volume 3
Extruded Path Abstracted Volume 2
Step 3.
The path system from core to margin provides safe shortcuts for olds, women, and childrens.
The backyards of Residences are the basic open space of the new paradigm.
The basic short cut would fix part of thetraffic problem. It is only for pedestrians.
Forming the six reprogrammed elements (except open park and housing) is a mission in the stage. It decides where cannot input open space and housing. The idea can be divided into two parts: firstly, the idea transforms the unsubstantial elements (such as road system) to substantial volume to decide where the open space is. Secondly, the other idea forms the substantial space that has other function such as Parking Tower and Business.
6-1b: Input the 5-2-2 (Recovery the Context)The reprogrammed elements from the 5-2-2 (Recovery the context) are operated into Volume that decides the no housing area. Height of the volume is unlimited so it means that the principle of skyline is finished but the outline of it still is dynamic in different city form. It decides the quality of open space and density arrangement. The forms of surplus volume are living space of 10000people/ 22ha. The quantity of volumes is fixed in the process and they are operated with the idea from 6-2-4b(Options of Housing). The variation of spaces is activated from an even height arrangement. The condition is the principle of “Three Types Cities” in the next sector.
6-1c: Input the 5-2-3 (Allocation)In the end, inputting the 5-2-3 (Allocation) parking spaces and business into right locations that follow the ideas with concentration or scatteration, where can be inputted housing space is clear in the 3D model. The relationship between them also can be assessed precisely.
Step 7.
Step 8.
Current Situation Surplus VolumeNo Housing Volume
Step 4.
Step 5.
Abstracted Volume 5
Abstracted Volume 4Extruded Old Trees AreaPeriphery to Circus
Extruded Shrines + Squares
Connection + Square
Inputted Old Trees
Inputted Shrines
All Extruded Volume
Past City - 1940 - The View of Northeast
Current City - 2008 - The View of Northeast
Existing Three Elements - The View of Northeast
Shrine
Japanese Official Residences + Old TreesIf we ignore the current housing area, the lacations of two elements are scattered roughly from northwest to southwest in the block.
Activation of the Volume is the last sector of D.P.V. City, and it follows the Density arrangement from the chapter4 and the Program Ideas from the chapter 5.
The most important mission of chapter6 is to assess the possibility of forming a new paradigm. Is it true that the way of designing process is effective or not? Is it true that separating the structure to different sectors (Density, Program, and Volume) of city form still work and, most importantly, it work well?
The chapter can be separate into two main parts: Forming the 8 elements of programs and 3 Types of density and inspection of the results (There have three cities).
6a: The New Paradigm
The new paradigm of city form offers opinions of the Taipei city. It still can change in the future no matter how many years is needed. Constructing a new city in a same location with twenty years to fifty years is not so long because it still stays in a generation. In fact, the purposes of the new paradigm not only adjust density arrangement and programs allocation but also recovery the context of Lian-yun Block.
6-1a: 1940, 2008, and [? + elements]Forming the past and current Lian-yun Block into the 3D graphic Volume is the first step to activate the Volume Sector.
It is clear that the two city forms follow completely different paradigms on the same land. It is also clear that the relationship between the form of assumed 1940 village and the form of true 2008 Taipei city is weak and chaos. It is hard to make sure the context of history when we travel in the current environment. The context of Lian-yun block is already researched in Chapter 3 (The Sampling of Experiment) and it is only existed there. The first step to form new paradigm is forming the heritages (the 41 Japanese Official Residences, the 283 Old Trees, and the two Shrines) that are reprogrammed at the 5-2-2 (Recovery the context) and then match the demands of a new Lian-yun Block.
6b: Representative of Taipei
The designed results of new cities are not the true conclusion, but the whole process of operation of the D.P.V. City is. It can be a new paradigm to operate the transformation of every block in Taipei city. The forms of blocks are possibly different but the city can be arranged well in the future when it follows the new paradigm of urban planning of Taipei.
ParkingSpace
OpenPark
OpenPark
ParkingSpace
1930 The form of Taipei city
6: Activate the Volume - Form the D.P.V. City
Step 2.
Step 1.
The mixed volume is all unconstructed . It also decides thenew skylinec of the block with the new paradigm.
The Paradigm
6-2: 8 Elements x 3 Types = 3 City Models 6-3: Inspection of the 3 Cities
City - Type 1. - The View of Southeast
City - Type 4. - The View of Southeast
City - Type 7. - The View of Southeast
The View of Northeast - City - Type 1.
The View of Northeast - City - Type 4.
The View of Northeast - City - Type 7.
Population
ha x Density
DensityFormula
x Area 35m2
x Height 3.5m2
/ Housing Area (ha)/ All Area (ha)
Height
x3.5m Height
+ 1 Storey
+ 2 Storey
Population
ha x Density
x Area 35m2
x Height 3.5m2
/ Housing Area (ha)/ All Area (ha)
Height
x3.5m Height
+ 1 Storey
+ 2 Storey
OP4 X 0 8 X 400 4 X 500 4 X 700 2 X 1000
0 3200 2000 2800 2000
0
0
0
0
0
0
6m
7m 10.5m
10.5m 14m
21m 24.5m
7.5m 12m 15m
112000 7000 98000 70000
/ 0 / 4 / 6.8 / 8 / 3.4 / 4 / 3.4 / 4 / 1.7 / 2
392000 345000 343000
14 X 400 6 X 700 2 X 800
4200 4200 1600
6m
7m 14m
9m
12m
17.5m
17.5m
21m
12m 12m
147000 14700 56000
/ 11.9 / 14 / 5.1 / 6 / 1.7 / 2
514500 514500 196000
245000
D E G
C G H
J
H
The eight finished elements are matched with three types of density arrangement, and than the formation of 3 City Models are finished. They represent the completely different paradigm with current Taipei City, but the quantity of whole elements and density are no changed. In the new city forms, the quality of whole elements and
density arrangements are increased. The process of city formation is a mathematic formula, from numbers to area to volume to arrangement. It pursues the high variation and high quality of living experience. The new paradigm of city forms is happened. After that the inspection of D.P.V. City can be activated.
6-2a: Area 35m2 x Height 3.5m2
6-2b: Available housing Area
6-2c: Storey Height of Housing
6-2d: Density Arrangement
Following forms of the six elements and ideas from the other two elements, the three types of city forms will be finished, but how to operate the volume is a question. If using the standard of [living space / people] to decide the whole volume, it means that setting 35m2/ people is basic area and 3 or 3.5m/ storey is basic storey height, and the multiplication of population, 35m2 and 3.5m forms the size of volume.
The Volume of density: 10000 people = 1225000 m3 will be arranged in Lian-yun Block.
The whole block area is roughly 22ha, but the road system covers roughly 3.5 ha. Using the proportion between the road system and the block to decide how many area can be used in 1ha is rational. Moreover, the surplus housing area still needs to be abstracted by the other seven elements, so the housing area is not fixed in the cities with three types because it follow the density arrangements from three types.
Usual storey height of housing is 3 meters or 3.5 meters. In the block, it accepts all the two kinds of height because the two systems can be controlled flexibly in new paradigm.
The multiples of 3m and 3.5m is3m, 6m, 9m, 12m, 15m, 18m, 21m, 24m, 27m… or 3.5m, 7m, 10.5m, 14m, 17.5m, 21m, 24.5m…If we try to combine the two systems, it is[3m, 3.5m], [6m, 7m], [9m, 10.5m], [12m], [14m, 15m], [17.5m, 18m], [21m], [24m, 24.5m], [27m…
The expected height for housing can be matched between the new system and truly necessary height, making diversity for city form.
Following the idea from 5-2-4b (Housing), the three types have different proportion of density to input the block. If one necessary density area exceeds one level, the surplus area will be covered by part of next level. A district that includes a few Japanese official residences is the first choice in the work.
Core of Lian- yun Block
Type1
6-2d > The basic density arrangements of the cities with three types
Type4 Type7
Population
ha x Density
x Area 35m2
x Height 3.5m2
/ Housing Area (ha)/ All Area (ha)
Height
x3.5m Height
+ 1 Storey
+ 2 Storey
7 X 200 4 X 300 7 X 600
1400 1200 4200
3m
3.5m3m
10.5m9m
24.5m21m
7m
6m
17.5m
10.5m
6m 9m
49000 42000 147000
/ 5.95 / 7 / 3.4 / 4 / 5.95 / 7
171500 147500 514000
4 X 800
3200
14m
12m
112000
/ 3.4 / 4
392000
B C F
The low density area The low density area
DensityFormula
DensityFormula
Core of Lian- yun Block
6-2: 8 Elements x 3 Types = 3 City Models 6-3: Inspection of the 3 Cities
City - Type 1. - The View of Southeast
City - Type 4. - The View of Southeast
City - Type 7. - The View of Southeast
The View of Northeast - City - Type 1.
The View of Northeast - City - Type 4.
The View of Northeast - City - Type 7.
Population
ha x Density
DensityFormula
x Area 35m2
x Height 3.5m2
/ Housing Area (ha)/ All Area (ha)
Height
x3.5m Height
+ 1 Storey
+ 2 Storey
Population
ha x Density
x Area 35m2
x Height 3.5m2
/ Housing Area (ha)/ All Area (ha)
Height
x3.5m Height
+ 1 Storey
+ 2 Storey
OP4 X 0 8 X 400 4 X 500 4 X 700 2 X 1000
0 3200 2000 2800 2000
0
0
0
0
0
0
6m
7m 10.5m
10.5m 14m
21m 24.5m
7.5m 12m 15m
112000 7000 98000 70000
/ 0 / 4 / 6.8 / 8 / 3.4 / 4 / 3.4 / 4 / 1.7 / 2
392000 345000 343000
14 X 400 6 X 700 2 X 800
4200 4200 1600
6m
7m 14m
9m
12m
17.5m
17.5m
21m
12m 12m
147000 14700 56000
/ 11.9 / 14 / 5.1 / 6 / 1.7 / 2
514500 514500 196000
245000
D E G
C G H
J
H
The eight finished elements are matched with three types of density arrangement, and than the formation of 3 City Models are finished. They represent the completely different paradigm with current Taipei City, but the quantity of whole elements and density are no changed. In the new city forms, the quality of whole elements and
density arrangements are increased. The process of city formation is a mathematic formula, from numbers to area to volume to arrangement. It pursues the high variation and high quality of living experience. The new paradigm of city forms is happened. After that the inspection of D.P.V. City can be activated.
6-2a: Area 35m2 x Height 3.5m2
6-2b: Available housing Area
6-2c: Storey Height of Housing
6-2d: Density Arrangement
Following forms of the six elements and ideas from the other two elements, the three types of city forms will be finished, but how to operate the volume is a question. If using the standard of [living space / people] to decide the whole volume, it means that setting 35m2/ people is basic area and 3 or 3.5m/ storey is basic storey height, and the multiplication of population, 35m2 and 3.5m forms the size of volume.
The Volume of density: 10000 people = 1225000 m3 will be arranged in Lian-yun Block.
The whole block area is roughly 22ha, but the road system covers roughly 3.5 ha. Using the proportion between the road system and the block to decide how many area can be used in 1ha is rational. Moreover, the surplus housing area still needs to be abstracted by the other seven elements, so the housing area is not fixed in the cities with three types because it follow the density arrangements from three types.
Usual storey height of housing is 3 meters or 3.5 meters. In the block, it accepts all the two kinds of height because the two systems can be controlled flexibly in new paradigm.
The multiples of 3m and 3.5m is3m, 6m, 9m, 12m, 15m, 18m, 21m, 24m, 27m… or 3.5m, 7m, 10.5m, 14m, 17.5m, 21m, 24.5m…If we try to combine the two systems, it is[3m, 3.5m], [6m, 7m], [9m, 10.5m], [12m], [14m, 15m], [17.5m, 18m], [21m], [24m, 24.5m], [27m…
The expected height for housing can be matched between the new system and truly necessary height, making diversity for city form.
Following the idea from 5-2-4b (Housing), the three types have different proportion of density to input the block. If one necessary density area exceeds one level, the surplus area will be covered by part of next level. A district that includes a few Japanese official residences is the first choice in the work.
Core of Lian- yun Block
Type1
6-2d > The basic density arrangements of the cities with three types
Type4 Type7
Population
ha x Density
x Area 35m2
x Height 3.5m2
/ Housing Area (ha)/ All Area (ha)
Height
x3.5m Height
+ 1 Storey
+ 2 Storey
7 X 200 4 X 300 7 X 600
1400 1200 4200
3m
3.5m3m
10.5m9m
24.5m21m
7m
6m
17.5m
10.5m
6m 9m
49000 42000 147000
/ 5.95 / 7 / 3.4 / 4 / 5.95 / 7
171500 147500 514000
4 X 800
3200
14m
12m
112000
/ 3.4 / 4
392000
B C F
The low density area The low density area
DensityFormula
DensityFormula
Core of Lian- yun Block
Current CitySouth Section 1
Current CityEast Section 1
City - Type 1South Section 4
City - Type 1East Section 4
City - Type 1South Section 3
City - Type 1East Section 3
City - Type 1South Section 2
City - Type 1East Section 2
City - Type 1South Section 1
City - Type 1East Section 1
City - Type 4South Section 4
City - Type 4East Section 4
City - Type 4South Section 3
City - Type 4East Section 3
City - Type 4South Section 2
City - Type 4East Section 2
City - Type 4South Section 1
City - Type 4East Section 1
City - Type 7South Section 4
City - Type 7East Section 4
City - Type 7South Section 3
City - Type 7East Section 3
City - Type 7South Section 2
City - Type 7East Section 2
City - Type 7South Section 1
City - Type 7East Section 1
Current CitySouth Section 2
Current CityEast Section 2
Current CitySouth Section 3
Current CityEast Section 3
Current CitySouth Section 4
99m / 550m
98m / 550m
315m / 550m
241m / 550m
22m
12m
113m 140m
88m 125m
105m 125m
87m 13m
48m 48m 62m 52m
48m
31m
82m
75m 284m
75m
75m
67m
113m 215m
100m 200m
43m 72m
73m 180m
284m
33m
78m
33m 76m
205m
189m
48m 62m 52m
70m 20m 62m
33m 145m
32m
30m
120m
275m 40m
21m208m
33m
80m 18m
11m
60m 30m
145m 113m
48m 80m 113m
63m
25m 55m 10m
253m / 550m
98m / 550m
229m / 550m
273m / 550m
213m / 550m
98m / 550m
214m / 550m
288m / 550m
230m / 550m
112m / 550m
210m / 550m
44m / 550m
Current CityEast Section 4
165m / 525m
SouthSection 4
Eas
tS
ectio
n 1
Eas
tS
ectio
n 2
Eas
tS
ectio
n 3
Eas
tS
ectio
n 4
SouthSection 3
SouthSection 2
SouthSection 1
328m / 525m
359m / 525m
205m / 525m
235m / 525m
300m / 525m
359m / 525m
109m / 525m
236m / 525m
299m / 525m
328m / 525m
189m / 525m
234m / 525m
109m / 525m
115m / 525m
182m / 525m
Park
Entrance
The Backyard
Shrine
Shrine
0m125
300m0
6-3: Inspection of the 3 Cities 6-3-2: 10 Sections of the Elements
6-3-1: 32 Sections of the Density ArrangementInspection of the three cities is
necessary in the end chapter
because it can help us to make sure
that the theory of D.P.V. City is
workable or not. Is it possible that the
new functions (Program) are failed?
Is it possible that the new city forms
(Density to Volume) cannot match
the previous expectation? The
different kinds of perspectives will
assess the whole situation when we
compare the five cities (Three Types
Cities, the past Taipei city, and the
current Taipei city).
In the sector, one city is failed because it makes massive
contradiction between program and
density. One city is successful
because it fulfills most parts of
expectation, even though it is not
perfect. In the end, it is rational that
no city is perfect.
The 16 horizontal sections and 16 vertical sections are the samples of examination that checks whether the idea of density arrangement is workable in the Volume sector.
In the 8 teams, the same section of the four cities can be compared with several aspects and then they provide the conclusions to support or oppose previous ideas. It is possible to assess which arrangement is more effective.
In the eight teams, there has common
condition that sections of the cities with
three types have more lower and
continuous residential areas (especially
in the South Section 2) than the current
Taipei city, and they are well to follow the
new paradigm with low density area
(Japanese Official residences).
The covered length of low density (Lower than 10.5m = three storey) be measured with meter. It means that how many meters of length can match the context in every section. Of course, collecting Japanese official residences have more chance to create complete status of part of the new paradigm. But the other question is appeared: Whether the biggest residential area with low density in the section represents the best restored context?
6-3-1a: Assessment of the 5-4-2 (Classification)
6-3-1b: Assessment of the length.
The hole, even M shape society, and backyard are the three types of city form with low density. They can be compared in the South Section1 and South Section3 clearly. However, can it keep the quality in the three city forms?
The Hole - City Type 1:
In the East Section2 and 3, Type 1 do not have massive park. The hole is not existed, and the space looks like backyard imperfectly. In this way, it is hard to satisfy the two sides: Restored context of Japanese official residences and well function of road system and business. The old trees can adapt any form of empty space.
Even M shape society - City Type 4: It is failed in the sections because the even M shape society pursues relatively extremely uneven city form but it is not. Quantity of population can be closer with two extreme parts: huge area with lower density and small area with higher density. But it only causes closer height of building. The contradiction is appeared when we compare other city form with that.
The backyard - City Type 7: Despite the City – Type7 covers less length but it always keeps well quality with residential area. Is it a continuous region with the quality?
The eight sections of City – Type7 all reach the goal of quality. The quantity of hectare works well in Lian- yun Block, backyard is existed in everywhere.
The total amount of length in the 8 sections of the four cities is enough to assess the block situation with low density area. Samples of sections are enough to represent the condition.The current city has 1036mCity – Type1 has 2034mCity – Type4 has 1798mCity – Type7 has 1862mIf the lengths of sections represent the quantity of low density area, the amount ranking can be
T1 > T7 > T4 > Current cityBut T1 has too many empty spaces, less context. T7 may be the best choice in the sector.
The original parks and shrins cannot affect the density arrangement in the new paradigm, so they have same size of area in the three cities
The density arrangement is workable on left side.The entrance on right side (High Density Area) is fixed
The area of shrines is almost fixed. It is a comparison with finished low density area on right side.
It is the most clear that the new paradigm of three cities is more effective tokeep the continuous low density area than the current city
Current CitySouth Section 1
Current CityEast Section 1
City - Type 1South Section 4
City - Type 1East Section 4
City - Type 1South Section 3
City - Type 1East Section 3
City - Type 1South Section 2
City - Type 1East Section 2
City - Type 1South Section 1
City - Type 1East Section 1
City - Type 4South Section 4
City - Type 4East Section 4
City - Type 4South Section 3
City - Type 4East Section 3
City - Type 4South Section 2
City - Type 4East Section 2
City - Type 4South Section 1
City - Type 4East Section 1
City - Type 7South Section 4
City - Type 7East Section 4
City - Type 7South Section 3
City - Type 7East Section 3
City - Type 7South Section 2
City - Type 7East Section 2
City - Type 7South Section 1
City - Type 7East Section 1
Current CitySouth Section 2
Current CityEast Section 2
Current CitySouth Section 3
Current CityEast Section 3
Current CitySouth Section 4
99m / 550m
98m / 550m
315m / 550m
241m / 550m
22m
12m
113m 140m
88m 125m
105m 125m
87m 13m
48m 48m 62m 52m
48m
31m
82m
75m 284m
75m
75m
67m
113m 215m
100m 200m
43m 72m
73m 180m
284m
33m
78m
33m 76m
205m
189m
48m 62m 52m
70m 20m 62m
33m 145m
32m
30m
120m
275m 40m
21m208m
33m
80m 18m
11m
60m 30m
145m 113m
48m 80m 113m
63m
25m 55m 10m
253m / 550m
98m / 550m
229m / 550m
273m / 550m
213m / 550m
98m / 550m
214m / 550m
288m / 550m
230m / 550m
112m / 550m
210m / 550m
44m / 550m
Current CityEast Section 4
165m / 525m
SouthSection 4
Eas
tS
ectio
n 1
Eas
tS
ectio
n 2
Eas
tS
ectio
n 3
Eas
tS
ectio
n 4
SouthSection 3
SouthSection 2
SouthSection 1
328m / 525m
359m / 525m
205m / 525m
235m / 525m
300m / 525m
359m / 525m
109m / 525m
236m / 525m
299m / 525m
328m / 525m
189m / 525m
234m / 525m
109m / 525m
115m / 525m
182m / 525m
Park
Entrance
The Backyard
Shrine
Shrine
0m125
300m0
6-3: Inspection of the 3 Cities 6-3-2: 10 Sections of the Elements
6-3-1: 32 Sections of the Density ArrangementInspection of the three cities is
necessary in the end chapter
because it can help us to make sure
that the theory of D.P.V. City is
workable or not. Is it possible that the
new functions (Program) are failed?
Is it possible that the new city forms
(Density to Volume) cannot match
the previous expectation? The
different kinds of perspectives will
assess the whole situation when we
compare the five cities (Three Types
Cities, the past Taipei city, and the
current Taipei city).
In the sector, one city is failed because it makes massive
contradiction between program and
density. One city is successful
because it fulfills most parts of
expectation, even though it is not
perfect. In the end, it is rational that
no city is perfect.
The 16 horizontal sections and 16 vertical sections are the samples of examination that checks whether the idea of density arrangement is workable in the Volume sector.
In the 8 teams, the same section of the four cities can be compared with several aspects and then they provide the conclusions to support or oppose previous ideas. It is possible to assess which arrangement is more effective.
In the eight teams, there has common
condition that sections of the cities with
three types have more lower and
continuous residential areas (especially
in the South Section 2) than the current
Taipei city, and they are well to follow the
new paradigm with low density area
(Japanese Official residences).
The covered length of low density (Lower than 10.5m = three storey) be measured with meter. It means that how many meters of length can match the context in every section. Of course, collecting Japanese official residences have more chance to create complete status of part of the new paradigm. But the other question is appeared: Whether the biggest residential area with low density in the section represents the best restored context?
6-3-1a: Assessment of the 5-4-2 (Classification)
6-3-1b: Assessment of the length.
The hole, even M shape society, and backyard are the three types of city form with low density. They can be compared in the South Section1 and South Section3 clearly. However, can it keep the quality in the three city forms?
The Hole - City Type 1:
In the East Section2 and 3, Type 1 do not have massive park. The hole is not existed, and the space looks like backyard imperfectly. In this way, it is hard to satisfy the two sides: Restored context of Japanese official residences and well function of road system and business. The old trees can adapt any form of empty space.
Even M shape society - City Type 4: It is failed in the sections because the even M shape society pursues relatively extremely uneven city form but it is not. Quantity of population can be closer with two extreme parts: huge area with lower density and small area with higher density. But it only causes closer height of building. The contradiction is appeared when we compare other city form with that.
The backyard - City Type 7: Despite the City – Type7 covers less length but it always keeps well quality with residential area. Is it a continuous region with the quality?
The eight sections of City – Type7 all reach the goal of quality. The quantity of hectare works well in Lian- yun Block, backyard is existed in everywhere.
The total amount of length in the 8 sections of the four cities is enough to assess the block situation with low density area. Samples of sections are enough to represent the condition.The current city has 1036mCity – Type1 has 2034mCity – Type4 has 1798mCity – Type7 has 1862mIf the lengths of sections represent the quantity of low density area, the amount ranking can be
T1 > T7 > T4 > Current cityBut T1 has too many empty spaces, less context. T7 may be the best choice in the sector.
The original parks and shrins cannot affect the density arrangement in the new paradigm, so they have same size of area in the three cities
The density arrangement is workable on left side.The entrance on right side (High Density Area) is fixed
The area of shrines is almost fixed. It is a comparison with finished low density area on right side.
It is the most clear that the new paradigm of three cities is more effective tokeep the continuous low density area than the current city
Core Core
Core
Core
N1
N1
N1
N1
N2N3
N2
N2
N3
N3
N4
N4
N5
N5
N6
N6
N7
N7
N8
N8
N8
N8
N8
N7
N7
N7
N6
N6
N6
N5
N5
N5
N4
N4
N4
N3
N3
N3
N1
N1
N2
N1
N1
E1
E1
E2
E3
E1
E1
E2
E2
E2
E3
E3
E3
E4
E4
E4
E5
E5
E5
E6
E6
E6
E7
E7
E7
E8
E8
E9
E9
N2
N2
N2
W1
W1
W1
W1W2
W3W4
W5W6
W7
N1
N2N3
W1W2
W3W4
W5W6
W7
W2
W2
W3
W3
W4
W4
W5
W5
W6
W6
W7
W7
W8
W8
W9
W9
W10
W10
W11
W2W3
W4W5
W6W7
W8W9
E10
N3N2
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
N4 N5 N6N7 N8
N3
N1
N2
E1
E2
E3
N3Current City Form
City Form - Type1
Arrival Rate from core to margin: 0 / 18 Arrival Rate from core to margin: 0 / 17
Arrival Rate from core to margin: 8 / 17
Arrival Rate from core to margin: 7 / 15
City Form - Type4
City Form - Type7
Market
Market
Market
Market
Market
Open Park
Open Park
Past City Form
Current City Form
City Form - Type1
City Form - Type4
City Form - Type7
Past City Form
Old Trees
Old Trees
Old Trees Old Trees
Old Trees
Old Trees Open Park
Open ParkJapanese Official Residences
Japanese Official Residences
Japanese Official Residences
Shrine
Japanese Official ResidencesShrine
6-3-2: 10 Sections of the Elements 6-3-3: 30 Perspectives of the City Forms
Japanese Official Residences Business
Business Japanese Official ResidencesShrine Business
Japanese Official Residences
Japanese Official Residences Open Park
When we make comparison between the five cities, it proves that it is possible to operate well between programs and density in new paradigm (The cities with density of three types). Moreover, is it possible to operate the programs perfectly in the new three cities? The inspection of city forms: road systems + path systems (short cut) with old trees, Japanese official residences, business, and parking tower.
Different kind of density arrangement may causes some programs to lose functions. Especially when the new path system (short cut) from core to margin cannot work well, and the result is that some programs may lose connection with others. The relationship between all elements is broken possibly.
From Low Density Core to Low Density Margin From Low Density Core to High Density MarginAssessment from Core to Margin:
In conclusion: The programs are workable from the low density area to the high density area in Type4 and Type7 because they have successful new road system to reach other elements well. The connection can be more effective.
Following the two diagrams of City – Type1, it is clear that there have a few black arrows from core to margin. It means that the City – Type 1 faces a problem that the path system cannot keep continuous because the density arrangement makes too many empty spaces, so the experience of path system is failed and people cannot find out which direction is the right way in the kind of empty spaces.
Moreover, the other programs are also failed as the result of the other kind of chaos situation because people cannot find the short cut well in the block.
The inspection of programs is divided into two parts in the sector: Low density core to low density margin and low density core to high density margin. Following the two direction of density arrangement, it is conspicuous that whether or not the density arrangement can influence the function of programs (Eight Elements).
Instead of City – Type1, City – Type4 and Type7 have ideal path system that is continuous and clear. Pedestrians can follow the pavement (Old Trees Road System) to reach other useful programs that are added in the 5-2 (Operation of the 8 Elements) such as other old trees circuses, markets, and Parking Tower on the marginal area of the block.
The relationship between pedestrians and mobiles would fix the traffic problem in the new kind of micro traffic system that follows the new paradigm.
Arrival Rate from core to margin: 6 / 19
Arrival Rate from core to margin: 6 / 18
Shrine
City Form - Type 1
City Form - Type 4 and Type 7
Core Core
Core
Core
N1
N1
N1
N1
N2N3
N2
N2
N3
N3
N4
N4
N5
N5
N6
N6
N7
N7
N8
N8
N8
N8
N8
N7
N7
N7
N6
N6
N6
N5
N5
N5
N4
N4
N4
N3
N3
N3
N1
N1
N2
N1
N1
E1
E1
E2
E3
E1
E1
E2
E2
E2
E3
E3
E3
E4
E4
E4
E5
E5
E5
E6
E6
E6
E7
E7
E7
E8
E8
E9
E9
N2
N2
N2
W1
W1
W1
W1W2
W3W4
W5W6
W7
N1
N2N3
W1W2
W3W4
W5W6
W7
W2
W2
W3
W3
W4
W4
W5
W5
W6
W6
W7
W7
W8
W8
W9
W9
W10
W10
W11
W2W3
W4W5
W6W7
W8W9
E10
N3N2
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
N4 N5 N6N7 N8
N3
N1
N2
E1
E2
E3
N3Current City Form
City Form - Type1
Arrival Rate from core to margin: 0 / 18 Arrival Rate from core to margin: 0 / 17
Arrival Rate from core to margin: 8 / 17
Arrival Rate from core to margin: 7 / 15
City Form - Type4
City Form - Type7
Market
Market
Market
Market
Market
Open Park
Open Park
Past City Form
Current City Form
City Form - Type1
City Form - Type4
City Form - Type7
Past City Form
Old Trees
Old Trees
Old Trees Old Trees
Old Trees
Old Trees Open Park
Open ParkJapanese Official Residences
Japanese Official Residences
Japanese Official Residences
Shrine
Japanese Official ResidencesShrine
6-3-2: 10 Sections of the Elements 6-3-3: 30 Perspectives of the City Forms
Japanese Official Residences Business
Business Japanese Official ResidencesShrine Business
Japanese Official Residences
Japanese Official Residences Open Park
When we make comparison between the five cities, it proves that it is possible to operate well between programs and density in new paradigm (The cities with density of three types). Moreover, is it possible to operate the programs perfectly in the new three cities? The inspection of city forms: road systems + path systems (short cut) with old trees, Japanese official residences, business, and parking tower.
Different kind of density arrangement may causes some programs to lose functions. Especially when the new path system (short cut) from core to margin cannot work well, and the result is that some programs may lose connection with others. The relationship between all elements is broken possibly.
From Low Density Core to Low Density Margin From Low Density Core to High Density MarginAssessment from Core to Margin:
In conclusion: The programs are workable from the low density area to the high density area in Type4 and Type7 because they have successful new road system to reach other elements well. The connection can be more effective.
Following the two diagrams of City – Type1, it is clear that there have a few black arrows from core to margin. It means that the City – Type 1 faces a problem that the path system cannot keep continuous because the density arrangement makes too many empty spaces, so the experience of path system is failed and people cannot find out which direction is the right way in the kind of empty spaces.
Moreover, the other programs are also failed as the result of the other kind of chaos situation because people cannot find the short cut well in the block.
The inspection of programs is divided into two parts in the sector: Low density core to low density margin and low density core to high density margin. Following the two direction of density arrangement, it is conspicuous that whether or not the density arrangement can influence the function of programs (Eight Elements).
Instead of City – Type1, City – Type4 and Type7 have ideal path system that is continuous and clear. Pedestrians can follow the pavement (Old Trees Road System) to reach other useful programs that are added in the 5-2 (Operation of the 8 Elements) such as other old trees circuses, markets, and Parking Tower on the marginal area of the block.
The relationship between pedestrians and mobiles would fix the traffic problem in the new kind of micro traffic system that follows the new paradigm.
Arrival Rate from core to margin: 6 / 19
Arrival Rate from core to margin: 6 / 18
Shrine
City Form - Type 1
City Form - Type 4 and Type 7
2/18 Skyline of the Current City
D.
A.
B. C.
E.
F.
Skyline of Past City
11/18 Skyline of City - Type1
11/18 Skyline of City - Type4
9/11 Skyline of City - Type7
200
800
800
900
900
900
900
200 200
800
800
900
900
Shrine0
Shrine0
600
500
700
600
500
400
700
200
700
200200
400
300
300
500
200
300
300
300
500
200
200
300
200
400
200
500
400
300
500
400
200
300
300
400
400
200
600
500
400
400
200200
Parking0
Parking0
Parking0
Parking0
Parking0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
800
500
Shopping District
Shopping District
Shopping District
700
700 700700
Parking0
Parking0
Parking0
The open space of shrine cannot affect the density arrangement dramatically. In fact, in high density area, it is ideal to input the larger open space.
Type 7 is the middle class in the three city forms.
6-3-3: 30 Perspectives of the City Forms 6-3-4: 10 Densities x 6 Programs = 44 Volumes
After the assessment of 10 sections of the elements, traveling from macro perspective to micro perspective, the relationship between density and programs is assessed by the 30 perspectives of the human view. The traveling experience in the five cities is useful to make sure the expected condition of urban form is workable or not: the Appropriately Uneven City Form. In the other words, from margin to core and back to margin, the skylines of them are variety extremely, and it is easy to help us to figure out the variation of parts of city forms. For example, margin of the block with three types match the context of current urban form: housing
area with high density, and parking towers can be appropriate with the area, fulfilling the necessity of macro traffic system in city scale. Oppositely, inside of the block with three types partly match the context of past village: housing area with low density.
In conclusion, the extreme situation is expected through all chapters, but is it true that the cities with three types all can operate well especially in low density area?
A. South Margin of the Block B. Open Park and Shrine C. Inside Residential Area 1. E. Inside Residential Area 2. F. The East Market
Five Skylines
Six ViewpointsD. Core of the Block
The even city form is mediocre, weak relationship with localheritage such as shrine or Japanese Official Residence, but it is the inside problem. In the marginal area, the high density volume is ideal to match the macro road system, so the part is adopted in new paradigm.
It is the most extreme situation of the three types cities, and it is abandoned in the previous sector.
In the perspective of density, it is a rational new city form. But in the perspective of volume, the skyline of low density area is still too high.It is no value when the blockprovides massive high density area on the margin.
The achivement rate is not thehighest in the five cities but the condition of low density area is ideal to reach the local context.
The trees play the conspicuous role of the skyline in past city.
Assessment of the Skylines:
Using the skyline to assess city forms is practical to realize the true living experience in Lian-yun Block. For example, from past village to current city, old trees play the roles from conspicuous space to inconspicuous and we can make sure the variety from the skyline condition.
Moreover, we also can make sure the new condition of the skyline with new paradigm (Three Types): from inconspicuous space to conspicuous (Core of the Block).
However, because the near views and far views are mixed, so skyline cannot provide the information with precise density arrangement, but the work is finished in the 6-3-1 (32 Sections of the Density Arrangement). Form of the past Taipei city and the current Taipei city are too even of the skylines.
City with three types provide more possibilities of city form and it will help the future development of local community even though they have the different details in low density area. The details can be checked in the inside residential areas.
If we check near view of Japanese Official Residences, City - Type7 truly matches the skyline well than Type1 and Type4. In fact, Type 1 is discarded in previous sector of inspection.
2/18 Skyline of the Current City
D.
A.
B. C.
E.
F.
Skyline of Past City
11/18 Skyline of City - Type1
11/18 Skyline of City - Type4
9/11 Skyline of City - Type7
200
800
800
900
900
900
900
200 200
800
800
900
900
Shrine0
Shrine0
600
500
700
600
500
400
700
200
700
200200
400
300
300
500
200
300
300
300
500
200
200
300
200
400
200
500
400
300
500
400
200
300
300
400
400
200
600
500
400
400
200200
Parking0
Parking0
Parking0
Parking0
Parking0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
Trees0
800
500
Shopping District
Shopping District
Shopping District
700
700 700700
Parking0
Parking0
Parking0
The open space of shrine cannot affect the density arrangement dramatically. In fact, in high density area, it is ideal to input the larger open space.
Type 7 is the middle class in the three city forms.
6-3-3: 30 Perspectives of the City Forms 6-3-4: 10 Densities x 6 Programs = 44 Volumes
After the assessment of 10 sections of the elements, traveling from macro perspective to micro perspective, the relationship between density and programs is assessed by the 30 perspectives of the human view. The traveling experience in the five cities is useful to make sure the expected condition of urban form is workable or not: the Appropriately Uneven City Form. In the other words, from margin to core and back to margin, the skylines of them are variety extremely, and it is easy to help us to figure out the variation of parts of city forms. For example, margin of the block with three types match the context of current urban form: housing
area with high density, and parking towers can be appropriate with the area, fulfilling the necessity of macro traffic system in city scale. Oppositely, inside of the block with three types partly match the context of past village: housing area with low density.
In conclusion, the extreme situation is expected through all chapters, but is it true that the cities with three types all can operate well especially in low density area?
A. South Margin of the Block B. Open Park and Shrine C. Inside Residential Area 1. E. Inside Residential Area 2. F. The East Market
Five Skylines
Six ViewpointsD. Core of the Block
The even city form is mediocre, weak relationship with localheritage such as shrine or Japanese Official Residence, but it is the inside problem. In the marginal area, the high density volume is ideal to match the macro road system, so the part is adopted in new paradigm.
It is the most extreme situation of the three types cities, and it is abandoned in the previous sector.
In the perspective of density, it is a rational new city form. But in the perspective of volume, the skyline of low density area is still too high.It is no value when the blockprovides massive high density area on the margin.
The achivement rate is not thehighest in the five cities but the condition of low density area is ideal to reach the local context.
The trees play the conspicuous role of the skyline in past city.
Assessment of the Skylines:
Using the skyline to assess city forms is practical to realize the true living experience in Lian-yun Block. For example, from past village to current city, old trees play the roles from conspicuous space to inconspicuous and we can make sure the variety from the skyline condition.
Moreover, we also can make sure the new condition of the skyline with new paradigm (Three Types): from inconspicuous space to conspicuous (Core of the Block).
However, because the near views and far views are mixed, so skyline cannot provide the information with precise density arrangement, but the work is finished in the 6-3-1 (32 Sections of the Density Arrangement). Form of the past Taipei city and the current Taipei city are too even of the skylines.
City with three types provide more possibilities of city form and it will help the future development of local community even though they have the different details in low density area. The details can be checked in the inside residential areas.
If we check near view of Japanese Official Residences, City - Type7 truly matches the skyline well than Type1 and Type4. In fact, Type 1 is discarded in previous sector of inspection.
Road System
6 Programs
10 Densities
Japanese Official Residences
Old Trees+ Paths
Shrines+ Squares
Business
ParkingSpace
6-3-4: 10 Densities x 6 Programs = 44 Volumes The End of D.P.V City?
Back to the original concept: Density x Program = Volume, it is so simple but useful to read city forms no matter what scale of city form it is. In the sector, from high density to low density, from road system to parking tower, all of them are mixed in different situation. The kind of mutual support is constructed in new paradigm. Can it make sense about a beautiful city in every unit? What level of the density that the programs can reach is fixed, but it is flexible for future development.
City – Type7 is the Final Sample of inspectionCity – Type7 is the sample in the sector. Following the assessment from the 6-3-1 to 6-3-3, the process provides the reasons that City – Type7 can be the best choice of new paradigm of future Taipei City. First, in the 6-3-1 (32 Sections of the Density Arrangement), cities with three types is all successful to recovery the past context rather than current Taipei. The ranking of them is T1 > T7 > T4. Second, in the 6-3-2 (10 Sections of the Elements), Type1 faces a huge problem of continuous context and it causes failed path system and other programs, so Type1 is abandoned in that sector. Third, in the 6-3-3 (25 Perspectives of the City Forms), Type7 does not have the highest achievement rate in five cities but it is not the main purpose of the operation. The extreme condition is the purpose.
The extremely low density area is only appeared with open spaceon the inside block.
The diverse skylinesof road system represent the wholecondition of densityarangement inLian-yun block.
Following the ideafrom the 5-2-2 (Recovery the context). The new paradigmmakes that the city form is dramaticallychanged from current Taipei city.
The residences decide the densityarrangement well,and old trees andshrines cannot affect the abovecondition.
The two programscan work well onthe marginal areawith high densityvolume.
The partial allocation of themfollows the ideasthat from the 5-2-3(Allocation)
The relationship of local elemesnts is conspicuousin the density zone. TheJapanese residences coverthe new programs.
The group collects paces with the threeprograms: micro path system, old trees circus,and japanese residences of interior new programs. This locations of them mean that the new paradigm of local context is workable fromhigh density area to low density area.
Most of the travelingexperience in the inside street follows the density zone well.
The density zone is located between lowdensity area and middle density area. It has the two characteristics.
It is more like the current Taipei city , but the diverse heigh of volume is more clear than current.
The condition ishappened betweenmiddle and high density area inLian-yun block.
It is more possibly happened betweenextreme low and highdensity area.
The height of volume isnear 700 people/ha, butthe width of road system is narrower than that.
The high density area covers enormous quantityof population and it isefficient on the marginalarea.
The concentratedmarkets are locatedin high density area and theyall close the margin of theblock.
It is impossibleto see the JapaneseOfficial Residencesin the highestdensity area.
The open spacesin high densityarea is useful tobreak the massivevolume of housingspace.
Covering the most population in an area,it is appropriate to matchthe macro road system.
100 people/ha200 people/ha300 people/ha400 people/ha500 people/ha600 people/ha700 people/ha800 people/ha900 people/ha1000 people/ha
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
OpenPark
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
Circus
Circus
Circus
Circus
Circus
Circus
Circus
Circus
CircusCircus
Circus
Circus
Circus
Circus
Circus
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
Choosing City – Type7 is rational to be the last inspection and the end of D.P.V. City.
Road System
6 Programs
10 Densities
Japanese Official Residences
Old Trees+ Paths
Shrines+ Squares
Business
ParkingSpace
6-3-4: 10 Densities x 6 Programs = 44 Volumes The End of D.P.V City?
Back to the original concept: Density x Program = Volume, it is so simple but useful to read city forms no matter what scale of city form it is. In the sector, from high density to low density, from road system to parking tower, all of them are mixed in different situation. The kind of mutual support is constructed in new paradigm. Can it make sense about a beautiful city in every unit? What level of the density that the programs can reach is fixed, but it is flexible for future development.
City – Type7 is the Final Sample of inspectionCity – Type7 is the sample in the sector. Following the assessment from the 6-3-1 to 6-3-3, the process provides the reasons that City – Type7 can be the best choice of new paradigm of future Taipei City. First, in the 6-3-1 (32 Sections of the Density Arrangement), cities with three types is all successful to recovery the past context rather than current Taipei. The ranking of them is T1 > T7 > T4. Second, in the 6-3-2 (10 Sections of the Elements), Type1 faces a huge problem of continuous context and it causes failed path system and other programs, so Type1 is abandoned in that sector. Third, in the 6-3-3 (25 Perspectives of the City Forms), Type7 does not have the highest achievement rate in five cities but it is not the main purpose of the operation. The extreme condition is the purpose.
The extremely low density area is only appeared with open spaceon the inside block.
The diverse skylinesof road system represent the wholecondition of densityarangement inLian-yun block.
Following the ideafrom the 5-2-2 (Recovery the context). The new paradigmmakes that the city form is dramaticallychanged from current Taipei city.
The residences decide the densityarrangement well,and old trees andshrines cannot affect the abovecondition.
The two programscan work well onthe marginal areawith high densityvolume.
The partial allocation of themfollows the ideasthat from the 5-2-3(Allocation)
The relationship of local elemesnts is conspicuousin the density zone. TheJapanese residences coverthe new programs.
The group collects paces with the threeprograms: micro path system, old trees circus,and japanese residences of interior new programs. This locations of them mean that the new paradigm of local context is workable fromhigh density area to low density area.
Most of the travelingexperience in the inside street follows the density zone well.
The density zone is located between lowdensity area and middle density area. It has the two characteristics.
It is more like the current Taipei city , but the diverse heigh of volume is more clear than current.
The condition ishappened betweenmiddle and high density area inLian-yun block.
It is more possibly happened betweenextreme low and highdensity area.
The height of volume isnear 700 people/ha, butthe width of road system is narrower than that.
The high density area covers enormous quantityof population and it isefficient on the marginalarea.
The concentratedmarkets are locatedin high density area and theyall close the margin of theblock.
It is impossibleto see the JapaneseOfficial Residencesin the highestdensity area.
The open spacesin high densityarea is useful tobreak the massivevolume of housingspace.
Covering the most population in an area,it is appropriate to matchthe macro road system.
100 people/ha200 people/ha300 people/ha400 people/ha500 people/ha600 people/ha700 people/ha800 people/ha900 people/ha1000 people/ha
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
OpenPark
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
Circus
Circus
Circus
Circus
Circus
Circus
Circus
Circus
CircusCircus
Circus
Circus
Circus
Circus
Circus
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
ParkingTower
Choosing City – Type7 is rational to be the last inspection and the end of D.P.V. City.
Postscript: The D.P.V. City provides a possibility of methodology of city planning. It is continuous to face the dynamic condition of the current city. It is not to design another new city because the resources of local context are still stayed there. The work not only provides a new concept of feasible city form but also provides a new perspective that helps us to assess the current city and then realize the true destiny of it. In D.P.V. City, the sample of cities: Taipei city, and the sample of Taipei city: Lian-yun block, the new paradigm: Type 7. City can be operated well in the block, so each block also can do the similar way in Taipei. In this way, what kind of the city form is possible in the future? To be continued…
Architecture DesignThesis: D.P.V. CityNew Paradigm: City - Type 7.
Postscript: The D.P.V. City provides a possibility of methodology of city planning. It is continuous to face the dynamic condition of the current city. It is not to design another new city because the resources of local context are still stayed there. The work not only provides a new concept of feasible city form but also provides a new perspective that helps us to assess the current city and then realize the true destiny of it. In D.P.V. City, the sample of cities: Taipei city, and the sample of Taipei city: Lian-yun block, the new paradigm: Type 7. City can be operated well in the block, so each block also can do the similar way in Taipei. In this way, what kind of the city form is possible in the future? To be continued…
Architecture DesignThesis: D.P.V. CityNew Paradigm: City - Type 7.
In the project, it requests that the four programs: Office, School, Library, and Market follow a fixed proportion to input into a narrow site (10m x 55m)in Taipei city. It would be a complete complex building that is expected to fulfill the regional necessity of masses. However, is it possible that we can combine the four programs into a tall building? In the other words, is it workable that the four programs are operated well in a narrow area but tall height? It is also possible that we can find the answer in the city when we make a study of urban condition.
Urban Architecture Design
Architecture Design - Summer 2007
Advisor: Chun-Hsiung, Wang
Undifferentiated City - Academic Writing
The current Taipei city is dynamic and chaotic, no well planning. In this way, any where can be used to be the residences, market, or office. They are all mixed together. It causes the undifferentiated city. Following the figure ground of the four programs, it is clear that the city only has weak regional planning of them. No relationship when we observe them in the first time. But can we say that they are all failed? In fact, the situation provides the other kind of chance. They may adapt chaotic and even program allocation in a macro scale even though the city planning is failed.
Traveling around the city, the undifferentiated landscape always destroys our sense of geography, losing the direction. It is hard to recognize building forms in many regions. They are all simple cube. So how do we figure out different region? Where we are stayed? The shop sign and shop front is the main symbol of region and it is enough in the city, so the mixed and undifferentiated space is not perfect truth. In the space of Taipei city, making a discussion of building form is not the most important thing. It is clear that the size of programs and the chaos of program arrangements is the key characteristic that we need to consider. If the condition (chaos and even) is effective in Taipei city, it is also effective in a complex building that is expected to contain four programs.
It is rational that the perspective of a city decides the form and function of the building. It means that the city truly follow a Paradigm.
Office + School + Library + MarketComplex Building
Size and Barter - Four Sizes x Four Programs
In the project, it requests that the four programs: Office, School, Library, and Market follow a fixed proportion to input into a narrow site (10m x 55m)in Taipei city. It would be a complete complex building that is expected to fulfill the regional necessity of masses. However, is it possible that we can combine the four programs into a tall building? In the other words, is it workable that the four programs are operated well in a narrow area but tall height? It is also possible that we can find the answer in the city when we make a study of urban condition.
Urban Architecture Design
Architecture Design - Summer 2007
Advisor: Chun-Hsiung, Wang
Undifferentiated City - Academic Writing
The current Taipei city is dynamic and chaotic, no well planning. In this way, any where can be used to be the residences, market, or office. They are all mixed together. It causes the undifferentiated city. Following the figure ground of the four programs, it is clear that the city only has weak regional planning of them. No relationship when we observe them in the first time. But can we say that they are all failed? In fact, the situation provides the other kind of chance. They may adapt chaotic and even program allocation in a macro scale even though the city planning is failed.
Traveling around the city, the undifferentiated landscape always destroys our sense of geography, losing the direction. It is hard to recognize building forms in many regions. They are all simple cube. So how do we figure out different region? Where we are stayed? The shop sign and shop front is the main symbol of region and it is enough in the city, so the mixed and undifferentiated space is not perfect truth. In the space of Taipei city, making a discussion of building form is not the most important thing. It is clear that the size of programs and the chaos of program arrangements is the key characteristic that we need to consider. If the condition (chaos and even) is effective in Taipei city, it is also effective in a complex building that is expected to contain four programs.
It is rational that the perspective of a city decides the form and function of the building. It means that the city truly follow a Paradigm.
Office + School + Library + MarketComplex Building
Size and Barter - Four Sizes x Four Programs
Size (S, M, L, XL) and Barter of the Four Programs Building with Regulation or Choas
Size - S, M, L, XL Barter - [O]ffice, [S]chool, [L]ibrary, [M]arket
120m2
2m x 10m x 6 2m x 10m x 62m x 10m x 4 2m x 10m x 4x 3 Core Corex 3x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2
120m280m2 80m260m2 60m2Core
XL
XL L
CO
RE
CO
REM s s
XL
XL
XLL
L
LM
M
Ms s
s s
s s
M
M
M
M Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
CoreCore
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
M
M
M
M
L
L
L
LL
L
L
L
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
M
M
M
M Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
CoreCore
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
M
M
M
M
L
L
L
LL
L
L
L
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
2.5m3.5m
2.5m + 2m2.5m + 2m
5.5m
3m + 2.5m
3m + 2.5m
2.5m 2.5m 2.5m
Height
Area
Height
Area
2.5m 2.5m 2.5m3.5m
4.5m4.5m5.5m 5.5m
Core20m2 20m220m220m220m2 20m2
CoreXL
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ?
Following the previous Academic Writing, it discards the aesthetic form design and then changes the way to pursue the pure spatial relationship in the kind of building. In the chapter, the main work is to make the basic regulation of spatial relationship in different sizes and then rearrange the four programs into separate cube. It is
necessary to reaffirm that it is no meaning to make a discussion of aesthetic form in the city. Now, the four sizes x the four programs ≠ sixteen results, it tries to make sense of our life experience. What kind of building form is adopted and what kinds of programs are selected will have answer in the chapter.
If it is no meaning to make a discussion about form of architecture in the city, what kind of work can be the option? The diversity of programs size is the first idea and it can help to cause the clear relationship between program and program. So in the narrow site, I choose the area 2m x 10m to be the basic unit and then rearrange the size concept from surface to solid form. How to construct the building with diversity would be conspicuous but the principle of circulation is pure.
Most of programs can be described with different sizes that satisfy the separate necessity. So if we follow the Size: S, M, L, XL to arrange the details of programs, what kinds of programs we need? And how to transform the programs into spaces? The next work is to allocate the all into a vertical building. When we have a complex building that extremely mixes programs in every space, it is more possible that every space would have more chances to be used especially the library.
2m 2m 2m 2m 2m 2m2m2m2m2m2m2m2m2m2m2m2m
84.8m
Parking
11.5m
Size 2: The width of basic line is 2m
Barter 4: Principles of Program Arrangement
Size 6: The situation of stacling up the cubes
Some cubes is broken so how to fix the structure is a problem The hiden pathways cannot effect the chaotic elevation
1
Size 1: The region can represent the whole area of Taipei that is combined by different size of buildings. The chaos is not embarrassed in the city
Barter 1: It is conspicuous that the four programs have different sizes of spaces. We can try to sample the principle of them into the building.
Barter 2: In the complex building, the possibilities of programs are clear because they can mix together to satisfy the demand of separate program.
Barter 3: The principle of spatial variety. It decides the wall and furnitures of spaces. So the space can have a chaotic elevation of the cubes.
Size 5: If we try to change the parts of pathways to other side, the volume of building would be more stronger.
All thepathwaysarelocatedin oneside.
First:It cannothave theneighborswith sameprogram
XL:Office x 5School x 2Library x 3Market x 2
L:Office x 5School x 6
M:Office x 3School x 2Library x 3Market x 2
S:Office x 8Market x 8
W.C X 6
Third:The first arrangementcannot provide diversity.The second denythe first principle.It is rational tochoose a chaoticcondition.
Second:Market, Library, and School have the reason to near thecore because if they cannotdeny the first principle, theyneed a vertical relationship of their operation.The Ranking isLibrary> School> Market
XL to S
XL to S
S to XL
S to XL
XL to S
XL to S
S to XL
S to XL
FromXL to Sor S toXL,theyarelocatedindifferentside.
Size 3: Following the basic line to decide the different sizes of space, the four kinds of size are enough to fulfill the demand and supply the diversity of the complex buiilding. The different areas include the height of separatespace. In the XL cube, the 5.5m height is possible for second layer (3m + 2.5m)
Size 4: The question is: how do they can be constructed in a vertical building? The problems of structure andcirculation need to be solved to held a more stable construction.
First Step: Arranging the units into different parts, the height of space is no idea currentlySecond Step: 2.5m is the limit height of the building and then it is added for 1m, 2m, 3mThird Step: Transforming the units to adapt the form of site, it is possible to add second layer in the XL cube and L cube.
XLL LM M CoreS S S S S S
CoreXL XLL LM M CoreS S S SS S
2
3
4
5
5
6
[O]ffice/ Studio
XL L M S XL L M S
[S]chool
[L]ibrary
[M]arket
Office
ConferenceRoom
Office Office
Studio Studio
ReceptionRoom
LectureTheatre
OpenStacks / Stacks
VendingMachine/Rest Room/Lunge
Classroom Classroom/LectureHall
Magazine/Newspaper/Children’sDepartment
ConvenienceStore/Restaurant
Market
W.C
XL L M S
OO O Core1st 1st2nd
1st
1st 1st2nd
3rd
3rd
3rd
3rd
3rd
3rd
1st 1st2nd
1st 1st2nd
1st2nd
1st 1st2nd
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
OO O
LL LMM M
SS S
SS S
So LSo L
So MSo M
SO L
SO L
OO OOO O
LL LMM M
SS S
SS S
SO OLO S
SO LOM M
OS L
SO M
12F
11F
10F
9F
8F
7F
6F
5F
4F
3F
1F
2F
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
O
O
O
O
O
S
S
L
L
L
M
M
L
S
O
O
S
L
O
O
M
L
M
O
Core
Core
O
O
O
O
O
S
S
S
S
S
S
O L
S
S
S
O
O
S
S
O
S
O
S
S
L
M
L
O
O
O
O
O
M
O
O
O
S
S
L
L
L
M
M
L
S
O
O
M
L
O
S
M
L
O
O
O
O
S
S
S
S
S
S
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
M
M
M
M
O L
S
M
O
O
M
O
M
M
O
O
M
M
S
M
O
L
O
O
L
O
O
M
M
M
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
M
O
W
W
O
W
O
W
M
M
W
O
M
M
O
M
O
O
M
M
O
XL L M S1 S2
Size (S, M, L, XL) and Barter of the Four Programs Building with Regulation or Choas
Size - S, M, L, XL Barter - [O]ffice, [S]chool, [L]ibrary, [M]arket
120m2
2m x 10m x 6 2m x 10m x 62m x 10m x 4 2m x 10m x 4x 3 Core Corex 3x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2
120m280m2 80m260m2 60m2Core
XL
XL L
CO
RE
CO
REM s s
XL
XL
XLL
L
LM
M
Ms s
s s
s s
M
M
M
M Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
CoreCore
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
M
M
M
M
L
L
L
LL
L
L
L
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
M
M
M
M Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
CoreCore
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
M
M
M
M
L
L
L
LL
L
L
L
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
2.5m3.5m
2.5m + 2m2.5m + 2m
5.5m
3m + 2.5m
3m + 2.5m
2.5m 2.5m 2.5m
Height
Area
Height
Area
2.5m 2.5m 2.5m3.5m
4.5m4.5m5.5m 5.5m
Core20m2 20m220m220m220m2 20m2
CoreXL
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ?
Following the previous Academic Writing, it discards the aesthetic form design and then changes the way to pursue the pure spatial relationship in the kind of building. In the chapter, the main work is to make the basic regulation of spatial relationship in different sizes and then rearrange the four programs into separate cube. It is
necessary to reaffirm that it is no meaning to make a discussion of aesthetic form in the city. Now, the four sizes x the four programs ≠ sixteen results, it tries to make sense of our life experience. What kind of building form is adopted and what kinds of programs are selected will have answer in the chapter.
If it is no meaning to make a discussion about form of architecture in the city, what kind of work can be the option? The diversity of programs size is the first idea and it can help to cause the clear relationship between program and program. So in the narrow site, I choose the area 2m x 10m to be the basic unit and then rearrange the size concept from surface to solid form. How to construct the building with diversity would be conspicuous but the principle of circulation is pure.
Most of programs can be described with different sizes that satisfy the separate necessity. So if we follow the Size: S, M, L, XL to arrange the details of programs, what kinds of programs we need? And how to transform the programs into spaces? The next work is to allocate the all into a vertical building. When we have a complex building that extremely mixes programs in every space, it is more possible that every space would have more chances to be used especially the library.
2m 2m 2m 2m 2m 2m2m2m2m2m2m2m2m2m2m2m2m
84.8m
Parking
11.5m
Size 2: The width of basic line is 2m
Barter 4: Principles of Program Arrangement
Size 6: The situation of stacling up the cubes
Some cubes is broken so how to fix the structure is a problem The hiden pathways cannot effect the chaotic elevation
1
Size 1: The region can represent the whole area of Taipei that is combined by different size of buildings. The chaos is not embarrassed in the city
Barter 1: It is conspicuous that the four programs have different sizes of spaces. We can try to sample the principle of them into the building.
Barter 2: In the complex building, the possibilities of programs are clear because they can mix together to satisfy the demand of separate program.
Barter 3: The principle of spatial variety. It decides the wall and furnitures of spaces. So the space can have a chaotic elevation of the cubes.
Size 5: If we try to change the parts of pathways to other side, the volume of building would be more stronger.
All thepathwaysarelocatedin oneside.
First:It cannothave theneighborswith sameprogram
XL:Office x 5School x 2Library x 3Market x 2
L:Office x 5School x 6
M:Office x 3School x 2Library x 3Market x 2
S:Office x 8Market x 8
W.C X 6
Third:The first arrangementcannot provide diversity.The second denythe first principle.It is rational tochoose a chaoticcondition.
Second:Market, Library, and School have the reason to near thecore because if they cannotdeny the first principle, theyneed a vertical relationship of their operation.The Ranking isLibrary> School> Market
XL to S
XL to S
S to XL
S to XL
XL to S
XL to S
S to XL
S to XL
FromXL to Sor S toXL,theyarelocatedindifferentside.
Size 3: Following the basic line to decide the different sizes of space, the four kinds of size are enough to fulfill the demand and supply the diversity of the complex buiilding. The different areas include the height of separatespace. In the XL cube, the 5.5m height is possible for second layer (3m + 2.5m)
Size 4: The question is: how do they can be constructed in a vertical building? The problems of structure andcirculation need to be solved to held a more stable construction.
First Step: Arranging the units into different parts, the height of space is no idea currentlySecond Step: 2.5m is the limit height of the building and then it is added for 1m, 2m, 3mThird Step: Transforming the units to adapt the form of site, it is possible to add second layer in the XL cube and L cube.
XLL LM M CoreS S S S S S
CoreXL XLL LM M CoreS S S SS S
2
3
4
5
5
6
[O]ffice/ Studio
XL L M S XL L M S
[S]chool
[L]ibrary
[M]arket
Office
ConferenceRoom
Office Office
Studio Studio
ReceptionRoom
LectureTheatre
OpenStacks / Stacks
VendingMachine/Rest Room/Lunge
Classroom Classroom/LectureHall
Magazine/Newspaper/Children’sDepartment
ConvenienceStore/Restaurant
Market
W.C
XL L M S
OO O Core1st 1st2nd
1st
1st 1st2nd
3rd
3rd
3rd
3rd
3rd
3rd
1st 1st2nd
1st 1st2nd
1st2nd
1st 1st2nd
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
OO O
LL LMM M
SS S
SS S
So LSo L
So MSo M
SO L
SO L
OO OOO O
LL LMM M
SS S
SS S
SO OLO S
SO LOM M
OS L
SO M
12F
11F
10F
9F
8F
7F
6F
5F
4F
3F
1F
2F
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
O
O
O
O
O
S
S
L
L
L
M
M
L
S
O
O
S
L
O
O
M
L
M
O
Core
Core
O
O
O
O
O
S
S
S
S
S
S
O L
S
S
S
O
O
S
S
O
S
O
S
S
L
M
L
O
O
O
O
O
M
O
O
O
S
S
L
L
L
M
M
L
S
O
O
M
L
O
S
M
L
O
O
O
O
S
S
S
S
S
S
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
M
M
M
M
O L
S
M
O
O
M
O
M
M
O
O
M
M
S
M
O
L
O
O
L
O
O
M
M
M
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
M
O
W
W
O
W
O
W
M
M
W
O
M
M
O
M
O
O
M
M
O
XL L M S1 S2
VerticalClassroom
Theindependentconnectionof classroomis necessaryfor considerablecirculatingpeople ina short time
Office
Office
Office
Office
W.C
Office
Super Market
ClassroomClassroom
OfficeMagazine Studio Restroom
Restroom W.C
Restroom Studio
Reception Room ClassroomStacks Classroom
Office Super Market
Office
ClassroomClassroom
StacksOffice
Studio W.CRestroom Studio
W.CStudio
StudioRestroom Hanging Garden Office
Open Stacks
Market Office Lecture Theatre
Classroom
Classroom
OfficeHanging Garden
LungeReception Room
W.C
Building with Regulation or Chaos - A. Building with Chaos
12FS to XL
Bookshelf x 33Desk x 14Board x 1Chair x 30 ~
Seat of Lecture x 70Desk x 18BlackBoard x 1Chair x 27 ~
Desk x 54Chair x 57 ~
BlackBoard x 1Desk x 50Chair x 57 ~
Seat ofLecture x 70Shelf x 8Desk x 12Chair x 20 ~
Bookshelf x 24Board x 1Desk x 12Chair x 16 ~
Bookshelf x 7Board x 1, BlackBoard x 1, Desk x 49, Chair x 57 ~
Shelf x 26Desk x 25Chair x 31 ~
Shelf x 5Board x 1BlackBoard x 1Desk x 55Chair x 60 ~
Board x 1Black Board x 1Desk x 57Chair x 61 ~
Black Board x 1Desk x 58Chair x 65 ~
Shelf x 32Board x 1Desk x 12Chair x 30 ~
W.C Studio Newspaper Office
CorePathwayL or ML or MXL or S
Open StacksLecture TheatreHanging GardenHanging Garden ClassroomRestroom
Wind Tunnel = Hanging Garden
11FS to XLdown
10FXL to S
09FXL to Sup
08FS to XL
07FS to XLdown
06FXL to S
05FXL to Sup
4.5m
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
S
S
S
S
S
S
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
S
S
S
S
S
S
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
S
S
S
S
S
S
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
S
S
S
S
S
S
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
S
S
S
S
S
S
2.5m
2.5m
2.5m
2.5m
2.5m
2.5m
5.5m
5.5m
5.5m
5.5m
5.5m
5.5m
4.5m
3.5m
3.5m
4.5m
4.5m
3.5m
3.5m
4.5m
4.5m
3.5m
3.5m
04FS to XL
03FS to XLdown
02FXL to S
01FXL to Sup
XL or S
Building with Regulation
The contradiction between regulative inside and chaotic outside is not contradictory in the city. Maybe we cannot change the urban surface immediately but we still can have a chance to design the spaces that we use. The right is especially powerful in the kind of city. Furniture can provides enough information of every cube. It follows the same idea with shop sign. Form follows function cannot work in the city. In fact, I arrange the programs for cubes in the time, and it will be easy to change the program arrangements in the future to fulfill new necessity. The diversity is dynamic.
Section B
Section D Section E Section F Section G Section G
Section A
Section C
Levels of the building are diverse. The sections of building may confuse people that do not know how to arrive a specific program. Moreover, the structure of building likes to pile up cubes. The different size of cubes can be installed together on the narrow site. The width of every cube is fixed, so constructing them can be easy in the factory before transporting to separate location.
In fact, the circulation can be so simple in the complex building if we can regulate them well. In the previous chapter, the idea of barter provides the regulation of it. The circulation and structure can be assessed in the chapter. In the inside, it is a building with regulation.
It is necessary to provide the holes in the higher level because the building is too narrow that cannot hold the power of wind from the front direction.In this way, setting hanging gardens isrational.
0m18m
VerticalClassroom
Theindependentconnectionof classroomis necessaryfor considerablecirculatingpeople ina short time
Office
Office
Office
Office
W.C
Office
Super Market
ClassroomClassroom
OfficeMagazine Studio Restroom
Restroom W.C
Restroom Studio
Reception Room ClassroomStacks Classroom
Office Super Market
Office
ClassroomClassroom
StacksOffice
Studio W.CRestroom Studio
W.CStudio
StudioRestroom Hanging Garden Office
Open Stacks
Market Office Lecture Theatre
Classroom
Classroom
OfficeHanging Garden
LungeReception Room
W.C
Building with Regulation or Chaos - A. Building with Chaos
12FS to XL
Bookshelf x 33Desk x 14Board x 1Chair x 30 ~
Seat of Lecture x 70Desk x 18BlackBoard x 1Chair x 27 ~
Desk x 54Chair x 57 ~
BlackBoard x 1Desk x 50Chair x 57 ~
Seat ofLecture x 70Shelf x 8Desk x 12Chair x 20 ~
Bookshelf x 24Board x 1Desk x 12Chair x 16 ~
Bookshelf x 7Board x 1, BlackBoard x 1, Desk x 49, Chair x 57 ~
Shelf x 26Desk x 25Chair x 31 ~
Shelf x 5Board x 1BlackBoard x 1Desk x 55Chair x 60 ~
Board x 1Black Board x 1Desk x 57Chair x 61 ~
Black Board x 1Desk x 58Chair x 65 ~
Shelf x 32Board x 1Desk x 12Chair x 30 ~
W.C Studio Newspaper Office
CorePathwayL or ML or MXL or S
Open StacksLecture TheatreHanging GardenHanging Garden ClassroomRestroom
Wind Tunnel = Hanging Garden
11FS to XLdown
10FXL to S
09FXL to Sup
08FS to XL
07FS to XLdown
06FXL to S
05FXL to Sup
4.5m
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
S
S
S
S
S
S
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
S
S
S
S
S
S
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
S
S
S
S
S
S
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
S
S
S
S
S
S
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
XL
S
S
S
S
S
S
2.5m
2.5m
2.5m
2.5m
2.5m
2.5m
5.5m
5.5m
5.5m
5.5m
5.5m
5.5m
4.5m
3.5m
3.5m
4.5m
4.5m
3.5m
3.5m
4.5m
4.5m
3.5m
3.5m
04FS to XL
03FS to XLdown
02FXL to S
01FXL to Sup
XL or S
Building with Regulation
The contradiction between regulative inside and chaotic outside is not contradictory in the city. Maybe we cannot change the urban surface immediately but we still can have a chance to design the spaces that we use. The right is especially powerful in the kind of city. Furniture can provides enough information of every cube. It follows the same idea with shop sign. Form follows function cannot work in the city. In fact, I arrange the programs for cubes in the time, and it will be easy to change the program arrangements in the future to fulfill new necessity. The diversity is dynamic.
Section B
Section D Section E Section F Section G Section G
Section A
Section C
Levels of the building are diverse. The sections of building may confuse people that do not know how to arrive a specific program. Moreover, the structure of building likes to pile up cubes. The different size of cubes can be installed together on the narrow site. The width of every cube is fixed, so constructing them can be easy in the factory before transporting to separate location.
In fact, the circulation can be so simple in the complex building if we can regulate them well. In the previous chapter, the idea of barter provides the regulation of it. The circulation and structure can be assessed in the chapter. In the inside, it is a building with regulation.
It is necessary to provide the holes in the higher level because the building is too narrow that cannot hold the power of wind from the front direction.In this way, setting hanging gardens isrational.
0m18m
Building with Urban Form
up
dn
dn
dndn
dn
upup
up
upup
upup
up
up
up
upup
upup
up up
up
upup
up
dn
dn
dn dn
dn
dn
dn
dn
up
up
dn
dn
up
up
dn
dn
up
up
up
up
W.C
Section A.
Automatic Parking Space B1 - B3
The structure of undergroundspace is different with abovestructure of cubes 1f ~ 12f.
0.5F Main Entrance
Section B. Section C.
Studio Newspaper Office CoreCore
Core
Core
Core
CoreCore
Core
Core
Core Core
Core
Open StacksLecture TheatreHanging GardenHanging Garden ClassroomRestroom
OfficeOffice ClassroomClassroom OfficeHanging Garden Hanging Garden LungeReception Room W.C
W.CStudio StudioRestroom Hanging Garden Office Open Stacks Market Office Lecture Theatre
OfficeOffice ClassroomClassroom StacksOffice Studio W.CRestroom Studio
Restroom Studio Reception Room ClassroomStacks Classroom Office Super MarketOffice
OfficeSuper Market ClassroomClassroom OfficeMagazine Studio Restroom Restroom W.C
XLLMS1S2 XLLMS1S2
XLLMS1S2
XLLMS1S2 XLLMS1S2
XLLMS1S2S2S1MLXL
S2S1MLXL S2S1MLXL
S2S1MLXL S2S1MLXL
S2S1MLXL
+1.7m +2.7m +3.7m +4.7m
3F
2F1F
6F5F
4F 9F
8F7F
12F11F
10F
Building with Chaos
If the principle of spatial function can be fulfilled, the arrangement of walls would be dynamic in this building. The concept responses the urban form of Taipei city: Chaos and no facial expression. In this way, wall locations provide the information about relationship between cubes and structure of building. Different kinds of programs have different demands of open space. It is a common sense that the smaller space is more private and the larger space is more public. It is no meaning to create any small room in XL cubes because S cubes are nearby to assist larger cubes for leisure space or others. The condition of public and private makes more possibilities between walls and mirrors. Having a chaotic expression of the complex building is rational.
Cube Groups with Four Levels Cube Groups with One Level Cube Groups with Four Levels Cube Groups with One Level
0m12m
0m12m
0m12m
0m12m
0m12m
0m12m
+13.1m +12.1m +11.1m +10.1m
+18.5m +19.5m +20.5m +21.5m
+29.9m +28.9m +27.9m +26.9m
+35.3m +36.3m +37.3m +38.3m
+46.7m +45.7m +44.7m +43.7m
Building with Regulation or Chaos - B.
Building with Urban Form
up
dn
dn
dndn
dn
upup
up
upup
upup
up
up
up
upup
upup
up up
up
upup
up
dn
dn
dn dn
dn
dn
dn
dn
up
up
dn
dn
up
up
dn
dn
up
up
up
up
W.C
Section A.
Automatic Parking Space B1 - B3
The structure of undergroundspace is different with abovestructure of cubes 1f ~ 12f.
0.5F Main Entrance
Section B. Section C.
Studio Newspaper Office CoreCore
Core
Core
Core
CoreCore
Core
Core
Core Core
Core
Open StacksLecture TheatreHanging GardenHanging Garden ClassroomRestroom
OfficeOffice ClassroomClassroom OfficeHanging Garden Hanging Garden LungeReception Room W.C
W.CStudio StudioRestroom Hanging Garden Office Open Stacks Market Office Lecture Theatre
OfficeOffice ClassroomClassroom StacksOffice Studio W.CRestroom Studio
Restroom Studio Reception Room ClassroomStacks Classroom Office Super MarketOffice
OfficeSuper Market ClassroomClassroom OfficeMagazine Studio Restroom Restroom W.C
XLLMS1S2 XLLMS1S2
XLLMS1S2
XLLMS1S2 XLLMS1S2
XLLMS1S2S2S1MLXL
S2S1MLXL S2S1MLXL
S2S1MLXL S2S1MLXL
S2S1MLXL
+1.7m +2.7m +3.7m +4.7m
3F
2F1F
6F5F
4F 9F
8F7F
12F11F
10F
Building with Chaos
If the principle of spatial function can be fulfilled, the arrangement of walls would be dynamic in this building. The concept responses the urban form of Taipei city: Chaos and no facial expression. In this way, wall locations provide the information about relationship between cubes and structure of building. Different kinds of programs have different demands of open space. It is a common sense that the smaller space is more private and the larger space is more public. It is no meaning to create any small room in XL cubes because S cubes are nearby to assist larger cubes for leisure space or others. The condition of public and private makes more possibilities between walls and mirrors. Having a chaotic expression of the complex building is rational.
Cube Groups with Four Levels Cube Groups with One Level Cube Groups with Four Levels Cube Groups with One Level
0m12m
0m12m
0m12m
0m12m
0m12m
0m12m
+13.1m +12.1m +11.1m +10.1m
+18.5m +19.5m +20.5m +21.5m
+29.9m +28.9m +27.9m +26.9m
+35.3m +36.3m +37.3m +38.3m
+46.7m +45.7m +44.7m +43.7m
Building with Regulation or Chaos - B.
Temporary Void
South Elevation East Elevation
North Elevation
1F
4F
3F
7F
5F
8F
9F
11F
Hanging Garden - L12F
1F
2F
3F
5F
6F
7F
9F
10F
Office11F
West Elevation
Hanging Garden - S
Hanging Garden - M
Hanging Garden - M1.
4.
5.
5.
1.
6.
6.
7.
7.
8. 8.
9. 9.
9.
10. 10.
10. Entrance
Entrance
Entrance Main EntranceEntrance
Main EntranceEntrance
2.
2.
3.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Super Market
Hanging Garden - L
Hanging Garden - S
Hanging Garden - M
Hanging Garden - M
Restroom
W.C
Restroom
W.C
Studio
W.C
ReceptionRoom
W.C
Core
Core
Studio
W.C
Restroom
W.C
Office
OpenStacks
OpenStacks
LectureTheatre
LectureTheatre
SuperMarket
Office
Office
Office
Office
SuperMarket
Expression of the complex building is chaotic. It is hard to figure out the right location of separate function form outside. The condition makes sense with Taipei urban form. The complex building is truly complicated but it can work well because the arrangement of inside programs can suit the necessity of masses. In this way, can we say the kind of building is the best choice of Taipei city in the future? The building extends the current experience of this city but if the city can follow a new paradigm in the future, the idea of building would be abandoned. In conclusion, the expression of building can effect urban form and vice versa, too.
It is a contradiction between elevation and spatial experience.Elevations provide the information that circulation of the buildingis broken because the view of space is broken, too. In fact, all functions have close relationship when we observe theserious of perspectives. Smaller one assists larger one. Traveling on the pathway, other activities in other cubes areconspicuous.
Office
Classroom
Classroom Classroom
Classroom
Hanging Garden
Hanging Garden
Hanging Garden
Classroom
Office
Office
Office
Office
Office
W.C
W.C
Newspaper
Office
Open Stacks
Open Stacks
Open Stacks
Lecture
Restroom
Office
Office
Office
Office
Office
Reception Room
Office
Office
Restroom
Studio
Studio
W.C
W.C
Studio
Restroom
Super Market
M
L
L
M
XL
XL
XL
S
S
M
L
XL
XL
XL
XL
S
XL
S
S
S
S
S
XL
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Office
Stacks
Stacks
Core
Core
Core
M
L
XL
M
L
S
S
XL
S
S
L
M
L
M
M
M
XL
XL
Core
Classroom
XL
L
L
L
M
M
XL
XL
S
L
Building with Urban Form
Building with Regulation or Chaos - C.
0m18m
Temporary Void
South Elevation East Elevation
North Elevation
1F
4F
3F
7F
5F
8F
9F
11F
Hanging Garden - L12F
1F
2F
3F
5F
6F
7F
9F
10F
Office11F
West Elevation
Hanging Garden - S
Hanging Garden - M
Hanging Garden - M1.
4.
5.
5.
1.
6.
6.
7.
7.
8. 8.
9. 9.
9.
10. 10.
10. Entrance
Entrance
Entrance Main EntranceEntrance
Main EntranceEntrance
2.
2.
3.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Super Market
Hanging Garden - L
Hanging Garden - S
Hanging Garden - M
Hanging Garden - M
Restroom
W.C
Restroom
W.C
Studio
W.C
ReceptionRoom
W.C
Core
Core
Studio
W.C
Restroom
W.C
Office
OpenStacks
OpenStacks
LectureTheatre
LectureTheatre
SuperMarket
Office
Office
Office
Office
SuperMarket
Expression of the complex building is chaotic. It is hard to figure out the right location of separate function form outside. The condition makes sense with Taipei urban form. The complex building is truly complicated but it can work well because the arrangement of inside programs can suit the necessity of masses. In this way, can we say the kind of building is the best choice of Taipei city in the future? The building extends the current experience of this city but if the city can follow a new paradigm in the future, the idea of building would be abandoned. In conclusion, the expression of building can effect urban form and vice versa, too.
It is a contradiction between elevation and spatial experience.Elevations provide the information that circulation of the buildingis broken because the view of space is broken, too. In fact, all functions have close relationship when we observe theserious of perspectives. Smaller one assists larger one. Traveling on the pathway, other activities in other cubes areconspicuous.
Office
Classroom
Classroom Classroom
Classroom
Hanging Garden
Hanging Garden
Hanging Garden
Classroom
Office
Office
Office
Office
Office
W.C
W.C
Newspaper
Office
Open Stacks
Open Stacks
Open Stacks
Lecture
Restroom
Office
Office
Office
Office
Office
Reception Room
Office
Office
Restroom
Studio
Studio
W.C
W.C
Studio
Restroom
Super Market
M
L
L
M
XL
XL
XL
S
S
M
L
XL
XL
XL
XL
S
XL
S
S
S
S
S
XL
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Office
Stacks
Stacks
Core
Core
Core
M
L
XL
M
L
S
S
XL
S
S
L
M
L
M
M
M
XL
XL
Core
Classroom
XL
L
L
L
M
M
XL
XL
S
L
Building with Urban Form
Building with Regulation or Chaos - C.
0m18m
Temporary VoidSize and Barter
Future Automobile and Mobile TelephoneConcept Store
Architecture Design Winter / 2005
Advisor: Wei-Shieng Sung
In Taipei city, the private undeveloped space is scarce and dynamic. It can be used for any temporary function such as a parking space, an open park, or a model house. These programs all dramatically affect the local community but they are not existed permanently. Some programs provide benefits for local people but some programs are not. Now, I have a chance to face the temporary void. I need to realize the difference between programs. Caring the life of local people is not enough. In the project, creating more inducement of shopping is the other challenge.
This concept store provides the imagination of our future life with automobile and cell phone. In this project, I design two independent exhibition rooms that follow different ideas, but they have common entrance and service zone. The visiting circulations from two sides are workable in the store.
Temporary VoidSize and Barter
Future Automobile and Mobile TelephoneConcept Store
Architecture Design Winter / 2005
Advisor: Wei-Shieng Sung
In Taipei city, the private undeveloped space is scarce and dynamic. It can be used for any temporary function such as a parking space, an open park, or a model house. These programs all dramatically affect the local community but they are not existed permanently. Some programs provide benefits for local people but some programs are not. Now, I have a chance to face the temporary void. I need to realize the difference between programs. Caring the life of local people is not enough. In the project, creating more inducement of shopping is the other challenge.
This concept store provides the imagination of our future life with automobile and cell phone. In this project, I design two independent exhibition rooms that follow different ideas, but they have common entrance and service zone. The visiting circulations from two sides are workable in the store.
Outside: Four Temporary Voids of Concept Store Inside: The Two Exhibitions
Hole of the Wall
Elevation Design
Floor Plan
South Elevation
North Elevation
Section A.
1 Floor Plan
North North North
2 Floor Plan 3 Floor Plan
East Elevation
West Elevation
The Temporary Void faces the other characteristic of Taipei city figure ground. Buildings that locate on the margin of every block are combined to be a
massive wall. In current city planning, the space follows higher FAR standard than inside space of a block. It makes a conspicuous condition that the wall
can resist the pressure from main traffic system. People who live in inside block may have chance to breath easily. The site is long and deep into inside
block. The concept store not only cannot lead strangers into community but also provides program that services local people and visitor. I need to
consider the situation to be the main concept.
The two exhibitions have common entrance. The left side ramp is a runway of automobile. But in the space, visitors are the runners.
The inside continuous space can be readed from outside elevations. The forms of different mirror units follow different voids of space. For example, in the east elevation, the exaggerative form of curtain wall is expected to come into notice of visitors.
The right side exhibition room is flat space of mobiletelephone. It is flexible for different kinds or periodsshow room.
In the end of two exhibition, the highest level hasreception rooms and restrooms.
Void 3. Community
Void 2. Square
Void 1. The Urban
CommunityUrban
MobileSquare
Void 3. Mobile
0m25m 0m25m
0m25m
0m25m
Section B. Section C. Section D. Section E. Section F. Section G.
Outside: Four Temporary Voids of Concept Store Inside: The Two Exhibitions
Hole of the Wall
Elevation Design
Floor Plan
South Elevation
North Elevation
Section A.
1 Floor Plan
North North North
2 Floor Plan 3 Floor Plan
East Elevation
West Elevation
The Temporary Void faces the other characteristic of Taipei city figure ground. Buildings that locate on the margin of every block are combined to be a
massive wall. In current city planning, the space follows higher FAR standard than inside space of a block. It makes a conspicuous condition that the wall
can resist the pressure from main traffic system. People who live in inside block may have chance to breath easily. The site is long and deep into inside
block. The concept store not only cannot lead strangers into community but also provides program that services local people and visitor. I need to
consider the situation to be the main concept.
The two exhibitions have common entrance. The left side ramp is a runway of automobile. But in the space, visitors are the runners.
The inside continuous space can be readed from outside elevations. The forms of different mirror units follow different voids of space. For example, in the east elevation, the exaggerative form of curtain wall is expected to come into notice of visitors.
The right side exhibition room is flat space of mobiletelephone. It is flexible for different kinds or periodsshow room.
In the end of two exhibition, the highest level hasreception rooms and restrooms.
Void 3. Community
Void 2. Square
Void 1. The Urban
CommunityUrban
MobileSquare
Void 3. Mobile
0m25m 0m25m
0m25m
0m25m
Section B. Section C. Section D. Section E. Section F. Section G.
Inside: The Two Exhibitions of Concept Store Temporary: Detail of Automobile Exhibition
Sections
In the detail project, I chose the automobile exhibition room to challenge the issue about temporary. The kind of structure can be constructed easily
because the components of construction can be transported to the site easily and then be fabricated by labor power. So it would not cause too many
problems of original land. The idea makes sense of the project: Temporary Void.
Temporary: Detail of Automobile Exhibition
From urban scale into community scale, the different sections of volume are decided to elevate and marginalize. The activities of concept store cannot
affect usual life of local people. So the design work is to create a possible circulation of visitors which leans south. In the other side, the terminal coffee
shop provides s temporally comfortable space of all people, and the central interior square is a buffer zone between urban and community.
Section A. Mobile Void
Coffee Shop
Mobile Void
Mobile Void
Urban Void
North Elevation of Detail Design
South Elevation of Detail Design
Community Void
Community Void
Square Void
Urban Void
Section B.
Section C.
Section D.
Section E.
Section F.
Section G.
Back Square of Community
Back Square of Community
Service Area
Service Area
Future Automobile Exhibition ZoneFan Club
Service Area
Entrance ofAutomobileExhibition
Runway ofAutomobileExhibition
Central Square
Back Entrance ofCentral Square
Entrance ofConcept Store
Parking Space
Parking Space
Mobile PhoneMusic Station
Core
Reception RoomVIP RoomRestroom, Conference Room
Parking Space
Entrance of Central Square
Entrance of Mobile Phone Exhibition
Main Mobile Phone Exhibition Room
Runway of AutomobileExhibition
Service Area
Runway ofAutomobileExhibition
Back Square of Community
Central Park
0m25m
Inside: The Two Exhibitions of Concept Store Temporary: Detail of Automobile Exhibition
Sections
In the detail project, I chose the automobile exhibition room to challenge the issue about temporary. The kind of structure can be constructed easily
because the components of construction can be transported to the site easily and then be fabricated by labor power. So it would not cause too many
problems of original land. The idea makes sense of the project: Temporary Void.
Temporary: Detail of Automobile Exhibition
From urban scale into community scale, the different sections of volume are decided to elevate and marginalize. The activities of concept store cannot
affect usual life of local people. So the design work is to create a possible circulation of visitors which leans south. In the other side, the terminal coffee
shop provides s temporally comfortable space of all people, and the central interior square is a buffer zone between urban and community.
Section A. Mobile Void
Coffee Shop
Mobile Void
Mobile Void
Urban Void
North Elevation of Detail Design
South Elevation of Detail Design
Community Void
Community Void
Square Void
Urban Void
Section B.
Section C.
Section D.
Section E.
Section F.
Section G.
Back Square of Community
Back Square of Community
Service Area
Service Area
Future Automobile Exhibition ZoneFan Club
Service Area
Entrance ofAutomobileExhibition
Runway ofAutomobileExhibition
Central Square
Back Entrance ofCentral Square
Entrance ofConcept Store
Parking Space
Parking Space
Mobile PhoneMusic Station
Core
Reception RoomVIP RoomRestroom, Conference Room
Parking Space
Entrance of Central Square
Entrance of Mobile Phone Exhibition
Main Mobile Phone Exhibition Room
Runway of AutomobileExhibition
Service Area
Runway ofAutomobileExhibition
Back Square of Community
Central Park
0m25m
Temporary: Detail Automobile Exhibition Two Islands
Exploded Detail View of Automobile Exhibition Room
This series stages looks like a runway of mobiles, but mobiles are fixed and visitors need to follow the only circulation of exhibition. In the process,
people would have more chance to see the details of mobiles from different angles. The detail plan is to design a lithe structure of visiting experience,
so extended gaps between every stage are conspicuous. Other slight gaps are expected to dramatically extend the experience.
This temporary structure can be divided into several layers. From main structure to subsidary structure to walls to curtain walls, the process is fixed in
this project.
Detail = Circulation
420
1170
395
75
24
730
355
350
11501700970
455
420615 110
383
200
420
350
120
535
110
110
2090
1660
190260160470
1080
dndn
dn
up
up
up
up
up
up
up
2200
1170
940442
480150480600
+40 +150 +260 +370
+500
+590
+20
+20
+700
+770
Floor Plan of Detail Design
Upper Main Structure
Subsidary Structure A.
Subsidary Structure B.
Subsidary Structure C.
Stage
Ceiling
Support of Lighting Ceiling
Lighting Ceiling
Perspectivefrom Upper Level
Lower Main Structure
Curtain Wall
Walls
Curtain Wall
Units: Centimeter
Circulation
Section A. of Detail Design
Service Area
Exhibition Room
Section B. of Detail Design
Temporary: Detail Automobile Exhibition Two Islands
Exploded Detail View of Automobile Exhibition Room
This series stages looks like a runway of mobiles, but mobiles are fixed and visitors need to follow the only circulation of exhibition. In the process,
people would have more chance to see the details of mobiles from different angles. The detail plan is to design a lithe structure of visiting experience,
so extended gaps between every stage are conspicuous. Other slight gaps are expected to dramatically extend the experience.
This temporary structure can be divided into several layers. From main structure to subsidary structure to walls to curtain walls, the process is fixed in
this project.
Detail = Circulation
420
1170
395
75
24
730
355
350
11501700970
455
420615 110
383
200
420
350
120
535
110
110
2090
1660
190260160470
1080
dndn
dn
up
up
up
up
up
up
up
2200
1170
940442
480150480600
+40 +150 +260 +370
+500
+590
+20
+20
+700
+770
Floor Plan of Detail Design
Upper Main Structure
Subsidary Structure A.
Subsidary Structure B.
Subsidary Structure C.
Stage
Ceiling
Support of Lighting Ceiling
Lighting Ceiling
Perspectivefrom Upper Level
Lower Main Structure
Curtain Wall
Walls
Curtain Wall
Units: Centimeter
Circulation
Section A. of Detail Design
Service Area
Exhibition Room
Section B. of Detail Design
Two Islands:Temporary Void
First Island: Jiju Island - Hill of Sea Women MuseumBio-Climatic Architecture Studio
Second Island: Ho-Ping Island - Border EcotoneLand & Scape Studio
Architecture Design Winter / 2006
Advisor: Yoshio Kato
Architecture Design 2007 - 2008
Advisor: Min-Chieh, Kang
In the EA4, I joined the two studios that follow different perspectives to observe and research two islands, and then design the project that response to the characteristics and requirements of two islands.
“Island” is a special region which needs local people to care more about their available resources. It also provides a limit region which has independent culture and society. Everything can be more conspicuous in an island. From scientific method to emotional consideration, “Island” tests professional ability of architect. I need to put in more observation and consideration of local environment even though I am a stranger.Currently, Island gradually loses its characteristic because the globalization affects every space which people live. People’s livelihood may not be a problem in an island now, but architecture is not appropriate to follow the condition if designers still believe their profession. It is why I expect to pursue further knowledge of architecture.
The Korean Island is affected by oceanic climate, and its flat terrain promotes the characteristic that the wind velocity is dramatic height. Fortunately, the direction of wind is simple in four seasons, and the local material (rock) is stronger enough to resist the power of wind.
The two conditions can be used to construct a museum that not only solves the problem but also transforms the disadvantage into advantage.
The Taiwanese Island includes many immigrants who come from over eight races. It is not only a geography border but also a shelter of disadvantaged minorities.
The heritages from different periods of history in this island can be a chance to save the condition.
Two Islands:Temporary Void
First Island: Jiju Island - Hill of Sea Women MuseumBio-Climatic Architecture Studio
Second Island: Ho-Ping Island - Border EcotoneLand & Scape Studio
Architecture Design Winter / 2006
Advisor: Yoshio Kato
Architecture Design 2007 - 2008
Advisor: Min-Chieh, Kang
In the EA4, I joined the two studios that follow different perspectives to observe and research two islands, and then design the project that response to the characteristics and requirements of two islands.
“Island” is a special region which needs local people to care more about their available resources. It also provides a limit region which has independent culture and society. Everything can be more conspicuous in an island. From scientific method to emotional consideration, “Island” tests professional ability of architect. I need to put in more observation and consideration of local environment even though I am a stranger.Currently, Island gradually loses its characteristic because the globalization affects every space which people live. People’s livelihood may not be a problem in an island now, but architecture is not appropriate to follow the condition if designers still believe their profession. It is why I expect to pursue further knowledge of architecture.
The Korean Island is affected by oceanic climate, and its flat terrain promotes the characteristic that the wind velocity is dramatic height. Fortunately, the direction of wind is simple in four seasons, and the local material (rock) is stronger enough to resist the power of wind.
The two conditions can be used to construct a museum that not only solves the problem but also transforms the disadvantage into advantage.
The Taiwanese Island includes many immigrants who come from over eight races. It is not only a geography border but also a shelter of disadvantaged minorities.
The heritages from different periods of history in this island can be a chance to save the condition.
Wind
Rock
Rock
Defense
Hide
Wind
The highest mountaion (漢拿山) is only 1950 meters, so its height is not enough to resist the massive wind in whole year. In this way, thelocal people found a way to construct their housing that can resist the pressure of wind and, moreover, provide a safy space of daily life.
Sea women were distributed in two centries ago in Japan and South Korea. In essential resource of nutrient. Sea women need to dive into the water to find sea food. Now the existence of them is one of the most important heritage in Jeju Island. The oldest sea woman in Chiju Island is over 80 years old and not retired so far.
First Island: A Bio- Climatic Architecture in Jeju Island Exhibition and Landscape Plan
암석Rock
Formation of the island is by the eruption of volcano, so the landscape of whole island is formed by igneous rock.
Plant always has the ability to grow on rock.The cover of plant as a carpet on the island.
The rock was the most important resource of local people to create the artifacts and buildings.
바람Wind
In the warm current region, the transition of four seasons is dramatic. Dry climate in winter and moist climate in summer. 16 degrees centigrade is the average temperature of whole year. The range of temperature is from 1 degrees centigrade to 33.5 degrees centigrade.
The quantity of sea women drops fast now. In the 1960, more than 30000 people di the job but now less than 5000 people.First, the long-term work is too dangerous and most of women can find other works in towns. Second, pollution of the inshore areas is increased, so it is hard to findsea food there. The profession will disappear in the future. In this way, it is rational to construct a museum of them to protect the heritage oflocal culture.
Hill of Sea Women Museum
제주도
Natural Condition and Social Custom of Jeju Isalnd
Landscape of Hidden Building
The Hidden Method of Local Traditional Building:
History of Sea Women:Until the 19th century, diving was mostly done by men. The job became unprofitable for men since they had to pay heavy taxes, unlike women who did not. Women took over the diving (which was considered the lowest of jobs) and, because of the great dependence on sea products in most places on Jeju, became the main breadwinners. It could also be said that women simply were more adapted for the job, with their bodies keeping them warmer and being more suited to swimming than a male, with more body fat. With that, they often became "the head" of their family.
In the studio of bio-climatic architecture, I need to learn how to use the kind of practical information to design a building that matches the local resource and custom. Before beginning of the design project, I try to study the climatic and natural condition and social custom of the island. It is not only to solve the problem of environmental landscape but also to realize the influence of single building with micro climate. Form of the sea women museum looks like a hill that is hidden near a shore to protect the landscape and custom of local context in the Island.
SummerJapan
Winter
해녀Sea
Woman
This site is near the southern coast of the island. It is a marginal place that we need to drive car for one hour from a nearest city. Arround area is original forest so a conspicuous building would extremely destroy the landscape. Following the idea of hidden traditional building. The building is hidden under a hill. It is not only protect the landscape but also resist the power of wind.
Rock is the best local resource to construct buildings. Because the wind is so powerful that may destroy thestructure of housing. Using the rock to be the wall or to construct a half-underground housing is rational.
North
SouthShore
Korea
Japan
Korea
Wind
Rock
Rock
Defense
Hide
Wind
The highest mountaion (漢拿山) is only 1950 meters, so its height is not enough to resist the massive wind in whole year. In this way, thelocal people found a way to construct their housing that can resist the pressure of wind and, moreover, provide a safy space of daily life.
Sea women were distributed in two centries ago in Japan and South Korea. In essential resource of nutrient. Sea women need to dive into the water to find sea food. Now the existence of them is one of the most important heritage in Jeju Island. The oldest sea woman in Chiju Island is over 80 years old and not retired so far.
First Island: A Bio- Climatic Architecture in Jeju Island Exhibition and Landscape Plan
암석Rock
Formation of the island is by the eruption of volcano, so the landscape of whole island is formed by igneous rock.
Plant always has the ability to grow on rock.The cover of plant as a carpet on the island.
The rock was the most important resource of local people to create the artifacts and buildings.
바람Wind
In the warm current region, the transition of four seasons is dramatic. Dry climate in winter and moist climate in summer. 16 degrees centigrade is the average temperature of whole year. The range of temperature is from 1 degrees centigrade to 33.5 degrees centigrade.
The quantity of sea women drops fast now. In the 1960, more than 30000 people di the job but now less than 5000 people.First, the long-term work is too dangerous and most of women can find other works in towns. Second, pollution of the inshore areas is increased, so it is hard to findsea food there. The profession will disappear in the future. In this way, it is rational to construct a museum of them to protect the heritage oflocal culture.
Hill of Sea Women Museum
제주도
Natural Condition and Social Custom of Jeju Isalnd
Landscape of Hidden Building
The Hidden Method of Local Traditional Building:
History of Sea Women:Until the 19th century, diving was mostly done by men. The job became unprofitable for men since they had to pay heavy taxes, unlike women who did not. Women took over the diving (which was considered the lowest of jobs) and, because of the great dependence on sea products in most places on Jeju, became the main breadwinners. It could also be said that women simply were more adapted for the job, with their bodies keeping them warmer and being more suited to swimming than a male, with more body fat. With that, they often became "the head" of their family.
In the studio of bio-climatic architecture, I need to learn how to use the kind of practical information to design a building that matches the local resource and custom. Before beginning of the design project, I try to study the climatic and natural condition and social custom of the island. It is not only to solve the problem of environmental landscape but also to realize the influence of single building with micro climate. Form of the sea women museum looks like a hill that is hidden near a shore to protect the landscape and custom of local context in the Island.
SummerJapan
Winter
해녀Sea
Woman
This site is near the southern coast of the island. It is a marginal place that we need to drive car for one hour from a nearest city. Arround area is original forest so a conspicuous building would extremely destroy the landscape. Following the idea of hidden traditional building. The building is hidden under a hill. It is not only protect the landscape but also resist the power of wind.
Rock is the best local resource to construct buildings. Because the wind is so powerful that may destroy thestructure of housing. Using the rock to be the wall or to construct a half-underground housing is rational.
North
SouthShore
Korea
Japan
Korea
First Isalnd: Exhibition and Landscape Plan Application of Water Tank
Hill B
B2 Plan
1.Entrance Hall
2.East (Main) Information
3.Director Office
4.Office
5.Reception Room
6. W.C
7.Aquarium Maintenance Office
8.Warehouse
9.Store
10.Buffet
11.Foyer
12.West Information
13.Exhibition Room
14.SEA Square
15.Warehouse
16.Facilities
Exit
+5m
-2m
-7m
Square
WaterSquare
Entrance
Entrance
Shore
Exit
Hill
Hill A
1.
2.
3.
4.
25.
0m28m0m28m
21.
20.
19.
17.
18.
23.
24.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.6.
16.
11.
12.
6.
15.
13.13.
13.
Hill CParking Space
South
Section A.
Section B.
Section C.
1F Plan
17.Wind Tube
18.Handicraft & Biography Gallery
19.Seascape Room
20.Experience Box 1
21.Water Tank
22.Experience Box 2
23.Exit Hall
24.Exit Gallery
25.Stage Drama
Section B.
Section C.Section A.
North
West East
South
The museum is divided into two main parts: upper exhibition and lower exhibition. They follow different ideas of visiting experience. One (lower) is the traditional exhibition of the artifacts and history, and the other one (upper) is a unique exhibition that like a massive aquarium.
The upper exhibition is an enormous aquarium and people will visit five cube which show the work experience of sea women. Moreover, it is not only a tank of water. The parts of material of aquarium wall are glasses so light will reflect into the building to make dynamic shadow of whole museum. The museum does not need much electric power of light, too.
Lower Exhibition Upper Exhibition
Circulation of Visiting
18. Handicraft and Biography Gallery
24. Exit Gallery
Lower Exhibition: Water Square
North South
North South
From facilities to exhibition room, almost all traditional functions are collected in the lower space. Central Square of lower space is under the aquarium and it provides the region of activity and performance. Considering the micro climatic condition and the efficiency of visiting, the method of location is rational.
North
First Isalnd: Exhibition and Landscape Plan Application of Water Tank
Hill B
B2 Plan
1.Entrance Hall
2.East (Main) Information
3.Director Office
4.Office
5.Reception Room
6. W.C
7.Aquarium Maintenance Office
8.Warehouse
9.Store
10.Buffet
11.Foyer
12.West Information
13.Exhibition Room
14.SEA Square
15.Warehouse
16.Facilities
Exit
+5m
-2m
-7m
Square
WaterSquare
Entrance
Entrance
Shore
Exit
Hill
Hill A
1.
2.
3.
4.
25.
0m28m0m28m
21.
20.
19.
17.
18.
23.
24.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.6.
16.
11.
12.
6.
15.
13.13.
13.
Hill CParking Space
South
Section A.
Section B.
Section C.
1F Plan
17.Wind Tube
18.Handicraft & Biography Gallery
19.Seascape Room
20.Experience Box 1
21.Water Tank
22.Experience Box 2
23.Exit Hall
24.Exit Gallery
25.Stage Drama
Section B.
Section C.Section A.
North
West East
South
The museum is divided into two main parts: upper exhibition and lower exhibition. They follow different ideas of visiting experience. One (lower) is the traditional exhibition of the artifacts and history, and the other one (upper) is a unique exhibition that like a massive aquarium.
The upper exhibition is an enormous aquarium and people will visit five cube which show the work experience of sea women. Moreover, it is not only a tank of water. The parts of material of aquarium wall are glasses so light will reflect into the building to make dynamic shadow of whole museum. The museum does not need much electric power of light, too.
Lower Exhibition Upper Exhibition
Circulation of Visiting
18. Handicraft and Biography Gallery
24. Exit Gallery
Lower Exhibition: Water Square
North South
North South
From facilities to exhibition room, almost all traditional functions are collected in the lower space. Central Square of lower space is under the aquarium and it provides the region of activity and performance. Considering the micro climatic condition and the efficiency of visiting, the method of location is rational.
North
First Island: Application of Water Tank (Upper Exhibition) Second Island: Ho- Ping Island
Observat ionResearchHarvestDirect ion Diving
Firstly, The front whole absorbs hot air from south into the half-underground museum in summer, and then the temperature is decreased when they flow through the water tank. The cold air will comes down into lower exhibition room.
Secondly, in the lower layer, exhaust gas such as co2 would be accumulated. The electric fan can sent the gas from lower exhibition room to the upper hill. The kind of thermal convection is efficient in this museum.
Hot Air
co2
Whole
Experience CubesUpper ExhibitionWater Membrane
Structure
Service CenterLower Exhibition
Pillars ,Stairs, Elevators
Entrance
Seascape Window
Micro Climatic Condition
Experience of Sea Woman Exploded View of Sea Woman Museum
In the upper exhibition room, the five cubes are connected to express the work experience of sea woman, so the process can be divided into the five parts: Observation, Diving, Search, Harvest, and Direction. It is so simple but the experience still is special for common masses. How they dive into the bottom of shallow sea? Performance of true sea woman can be achieved in the aquarium.
Exhaust Gas
South
In Summer
In Winter
In Summer
South
South
Water
O2
South
North
South
North
Cold Air
Seascape Balcony
Stage Drama
Hill: Cortex
Natural Lighting
First Island: Application of Water Tank (Upper Exhibition) Second Island: Ho- Ping Island
Observat ionResearchHarvestDirect ion Diving
Firstly, The front whole absorbs hot air from south into the half-underground museum in summer, and then the temperature is decreased when they flow through the water tank. The cold air will comes down into lower exhibition room.
Secondly, in the lower layer, exhaust gas such as co2 would be accumulated. The electric fan can sent the gas from lower exhibition room to the upper hill. The kind of thermal convection is efficient in this museum.
Hot Air
co2
Whole
Experience CubesUpper ExhibitionWater Membrane
Structure
Service CenterLower Exhibition
Pillars ,Stairs, Elevators
Entrance
Seascape Window
Micro Climatic Condition
Experience of Sea Woman Exploded View of Sea Woman Museum
In the upper exhibition room, the five cubes are connected to express the work experience of sea woman, so the process can be divided into the five parts: Observation, Diving, Search, Harvest, and Direction. It is so simple but the experience still is special for common masses. How they dive into the bottom of shallow sea? Performance of true sea woman can be achieved in the aquarium.
Exhaust Gas
South
In Summer
In Winter
In Summer
South
South
Water
O2
South
North
South
North
Cold Air
Seascape Balcony
Stage Drama
Hill: Cortex
Natural Lighting
Second Island: Border Ecotone in Ho-Ping Island Alabawan: The Further Border和平島
Mapping I: Ho- Ping IslandBorder Ecotone
Border of Taiwan Island: Ho-Ping Island
Research of the island is a team work of five members, and we follow different concepts to face several specific regions. Concepts affect the methods of drawing and the size of study region. What kind of programs can be inputted in separate area? And how do we input the functions?The mapping is a beginning of the work of border ecotone. From natural landscape to culture landscape, the border can be connected with our work.
Different kind of building such as Factory, Temple, Military Base, Shipyard, Shed, etc. are all mixed together in Ho-Ping Island. Some buildings are so old but it is still operated currently. Some buildings are new but the results of constructions are rude. The lost space loses context of region and history. Can we find a way to provide new possibility of this island?
In the project, I try to follow the viewpoint of “border ecotone” to study an islet (Ho-Ping Island) that leans the main island (Taiwan) in its south. The perspective is that the border not only is a line in a map but also is a space or a history. In the frontier, many activities are dramatically different with common sense. It never stays in a peace period, and it is always dynamic. In the island, there have over ten races such as Japanese, Chinese, Dutch, and many Aborigines. It is no idea that which tribe is main tribe in this island?
I am a stranger for the island. When I travel in the space, it is easy to find out many heritages such as structure of military or buildings from different culture. The contradiction is extended and I almost cannot find out what is older and what is new. In fact, it is no matter for the condition because what time we join the micro society is workable. It never stops in any time. It is a border ecotone.
Border Oscilliate2007Yang- Yu Huang
Ho- Ping Island2007Chun-Yao KoRoy HsiehShih-Hisang LinYi-An LinYang-Yu Huang
Second Island: Border Ecotone in Ho-Ping Island Alabawan: The Further Border和平島
Mapping I: Ho- Ping IslandBorder Ecotone
Border of Taiwan Island: Ho-Ping Island
Research of the island is a team work of five members, and we follow different concepts to face several specific regions. Concepts affect the methods of drawing and the size of study region. What kind of programs can be inputted in separate area? And how do we input the functions?The mapping is a beginning of the work of border ecotone. From natural landscape to culture landscape, the border can be connected with our work.
Different kind of building such as Factory, Temple, Military Base, Shipyard, Shed, etc. are all mixed together in Ho-Ping Island. Some buildings are so old but it is still operated currently. Some buildings are new but the results of constructions are rude. The lost space loses context of region and history. Can we find a way to provide new possibility of this island?
In the project, I try to follow the viewpoint of “border ecotone” to study an islet (Ho-Ping Island) that leans the main island (Taiwan) in its south. The perspective is that the border not only is a line in a map but also is a space or a history. In the frontier, many activities are dramatically different with common sense. It never stays in a peace period, and it is always dynamic. In the island, there have over ten races such as Japanese, Chinese, Dutch, and many Aborigines. It is no idea that which tribe is main tribe in this island?
I am a stranger for the island. When I travel in the space, it is easy to find out many heritages such as structure of military or buildings from different culture. The contradiction is extended and I almost cannot find out what is older and what is new. In fact, it is no matter for the condition because what time we join the micro society is workable. It never stops in any time. It is a border ecotone.
Border Oscilliate2007Yang- Yu Huang
Ho- Ping Island2007Chun-Yao KoRoy HsiehShih-Hisang LinYi-An LinYang-Yu Huang
Second Island: Alabawan - The Further Border Community Centre Plan of Alabawan
Mapping II: Northeast of Ho- Ping Island Watercolor Painting: Imagination of the Underground Border
Alabawan, it means “The Lost Place” in aboriginal language. The current main tribe in this region is Amis, Less than fifty people, almost no young people. In fact, the weak tribe never has power to resist new tribe on the lower flat land in this island until now. So they had to withdraw to the border of border. In this valley, Amis is not the original ethnic tribe. In the end of valley, broken military vestiges provide evidence that there had Japanese troop eighty years ago. The work of them was to oversee the north shore of pacific for thirty years. It is the other border, but which is which’s border?
Model: Structure of the Underground Border
In a legend of Alabawan, the Japanese Fort has an underground pathway that connects the Japanese Dormitory and further entrance. I cannot find the precise entrance of the pathway, but I can begin to imagine the form of secret. If the legend is true, I believe it would be an important inducement of visitor. Following the perspective of border ecotone, it is not only a connection but also a space. What kind of the space is possible between the dormitory (and Community Center) and underpass?
After the imagination of underpass, I began to make a study model about two heritages that connect the underpass. This manual structure is rough but it truly responds the status of Alabawan.
Border of Geography 2007Yang- Yu Huang
Underground Border 2007Yang-Yu Huang
Alabawan: The Further Border
Alabawan
Fort
Fort
Fort
Fort PathwayForest
Dormitory of Japanese Troop
Community CentreVillage of Amis Tribe (Alabawan)
Entrance
Dormitory of Japanese Troop
Fort
Community Centre
Alabawan
Entrance
Second Island: Alabawan - The Further Border Community Centre Plan of Alabawan
Mapping II: Northeast of Ho- Ping Island Watercolor Painting: Imagination of the Underground Border
Alabawan, it means “The Lost Place” in aboriginal language. The current main tribe in this region is Amis, Less than fifty people, almost no young people. In fact, the weak tribe never has power to resist new tribe on the lower flat land in this island until now. So they had to withdraw to the border of border. In this valley, Amis is not the original ethnic tribe. In the end of valley, broken military vestiges provide evidence that there had Japanese troop eighty years ago. The work of them was to oversee the north shore of pacific for thirty years. It is the other border, but which is which’s border?
Model: Structure of the Underground Border
In a legend of Alabawan, the Japanese Fort has an underground pathway that connects the Japanese Dormitory and further entrance. I cannot find the precise entrance of the pathway, but I can begin to imagine the form of secret. If the legend is true, I believe it would be an important inducement of visitor. Following the perspective of border ecotone, it is not only a connection but also a space. What kind of the space is possible between the dormitory (and Community Center) and underpass?
After the imagination of underpass, I began to make a study model about two heritages that connect the underpass. This manual structure is rough but it truly responds the status of Alabawan.
Border of Geography 2007Yang- Yu Huang
Underground Border 2007Yang-Yu Huang
Alabawan: The Further Border
Alabawan
Fort
Fort
Fort
Fort PathwayForest
Dormitory of Japanese Troop
Community CentreVillage of Amis Tribe (Alabawan)
Entrance
Dormitory of Japanese Troop
Fort
Community Centre
Alabawan
Entrance
Second Island: Community Centre Plan of Alabawan Concrete Wall is the Border
UP
UP
UP
The Border between Community Centre and UnderpassThe Border between Community Centre and Alabawan
1F Plan
1.Square of Woodworking
2.Porch
3.Classroom of Woodworking
4.Depository of Karaoke
5.Gameroom
6. Storeroom of Vegetable Garden Tools
7.Underground Space
8.Entrance of Fort
9.Well
B1 Plan
10.Reading Room
11.Underground Square
12.Entrance of Underpass
13.Underground Gameroom
14.Underpass
15.Well
1.
+0m
North North
-2.8m
-0.5m
+2.3m
+4.8m
Section B.
Section C
.
Section D.
Section E.
Section F.
Section F.
Section G.
Section H.
Section A.
10.
11.
12.
13.
8.
9.
2.
3.
7.
4.
5.
6.
6.
DN
DN
DN
DN
DN
DN
DN
DN
14.
To Fort
To Fort
To Port
To Port
15.
In the end of Alabawan, there have two abandoned structures that can be used to be a tiny community centre. The purpose is to provide a functional space of Amis Tribe and Visitors who go to see the fort heritage. I hope the reconstructed structure can be a buffer zone between aborigines and strangers. People all can take a rest in the space or have a social discussion. The border can be an architecture space.
Upper Room:Woodworking
Timber Structure:In Alabawan, it is hard toconstruct a building with complicated skill becauseit is not a cost-effectivestructure. Simple woodworking is rationalin the project.
New Walls = Main Structure:The concrete walls provides stability of wholeconstruction. They followthe other direction thatcan be the support oforiginal walls, dividingthe whole space into fourparts.
Vegetable Garden:There has a tiny landof public vegetable gardenThe structure can beextended to the ramp.
Massive Stairs:The three massive stairslike a ramp that connectupper and lower space. The middle one also canfollow the under squareto be seats of party.
Lower Room:Reading Room
Underpass
Underpass
Gameroom
Storeroom 2.Storeroom 1.
The circulation between structure and underpass is a space that connects the two buildings to provide enough open space for people. In the open basement, people can hear the sound of flowing wing that from underpass. It likes a big secret that is prepared for discovery.
Section B.Section A.
0m10m
0m10m
0m10m
0m10m
Study Model: Fencing or Wall?
Abandoned Community Centre
Abandoned JapaneseDormitory
Section D.
Section E.
Second Island: Community Centre Plan of Alabawan Concrete Wall is the Border
UP
UP
The Border between Community Centre and UnderpassThe Border between Community Centre and Alabawan
1F Plan
1.Square of Woodworking
2.Porch
3.Classroom of Woodworking
4.Depository of Karaoke
5.Gameroom
6. Storeroom of Vegetable Garden Tools
7.Underground Space
8.Entrance of Fort
9.Well
B1 Plan
10.Reading Room
11.Underground Square
12.Entrance of Underpass
13.Underground Gameroom
14.Underpass
15.Well
1.
+0m
North North
-2.8m
-0.5m
+2.3m
+4.8m
Section B.
Section C
.
Section D.
Section E.
Section F.
Section F.
Section G.
Section H.
Section A.
12.
8.
9.
2.
3.
7.
4.
5.
6.
6.
DN
DN
DN
DN
DN
DN
DN
DN
UP
UP
-2.8m
Section F.
12.
14.
To Fort
To Fort
To Port
To Port
15.
In the end of Alabawan, there have two abandoned structures that can be used to be a tiny community centre. The purpose is to provide a functional space of Amis Tribe and Visitors who go to see the fort heritage. I hope the reconstructed structure can be a buffer zone between aborigines and strangers. People all can take a rest in the space or have a social discussion. The border can be an architecture space.
Upper Room:Woodworking
Timber Structure:In Alabawan, it is hard toconstruct a building with complicated skill becauseit is not a cost-effectivestructure. Simple woodworking is rationalin the project.
New Walls = Main Structure:The concrete walls provides stability of wholeconstruction. They followthe other direction thatcan be the support oforiginal walls, dividingthe whole space into fourparts.
Vegetable Garden:There has a tiny landof public vegetable gardenThe structure can beextended to the ramp.
Massive Stairs:The three massive stairslike a ramp that connectupper and lower space. The middle one also canfollow the under squareto be seats of party.
Lower Room:Reading Room
Underpass
Underpass
Gameroom
Storeroom 2.Storeroom 1.
The circulation between structure and underpass is a space that connects the two buildings to provide enough open space for people. In the open basement, people can hear the sound of flowing wing that from underpass. It likes a big secret that is prepared for discovery.
Section B.Section A.
0m10m
0m10m
0m10m
0m10m
Study Model: Fencing or Wall?
Abandoned Community Centre
Abandoned JapaneseDormitory
Section D.
Section E.
Second Island: Concrete Wall is the Border Public or Private
Space between New Walls and Old Walls Constructed Method - Handiwork Exploded View - Materials
The idea is about how to design a series of new walls that can fulfill expectations. First, the new walls can be the support of old walls from the other direction, so the old walls will not affect the continuous underground space that connects underpass. Second, all space can be divided into four parts by the intersection between new walls and old walls. The idea can extend the spatial experience. Third, the building is part of the landscape. From natural landscape to culture landscape, the structure can play an appropriate role in this border.
Activity of Woodworking
Reading Room &Under Square
Support and Underpass
> to Underpass
> to Underpass
> to Underpass
> to Underpass
> to Underpass
Gameroom
Store of Vegetable Garden
In Alabawan, it is hard to transport massive or complicated tools into the site because the pathway is too narrow. So consideration of handiwork is necessary.
When we dig out the whole, we can use two units of slightly different height of wood structure to support the two old walls. When one unit is supporting, we are also constructing a lower unit that is the support of next stage. After the underground space is finished, we can begin to construct the new concrete walls and wood structure.Section C.
Section D.
Section E.
Section F.
Section G.
Step 1.
Woodworking
Black work of Support
Concrete Wall
Woodworking of Stairs
Destroy parts of the old wall (abandoned Community Centre)
Dig out the soil inthe inside areaof old walls
Input the supportunits
Form the underground space
Construct newconcrete walls
Construct the structure ofwoodworking
Construct the walls and floors ofwoodworking
Step 2.
Step 3.
Step 4.
Step 5.
Step 6.
Step 2.
Second Island: Concrete Wall is the Border Public or Private
Space between New Walls and Old Walls Constructed Method - Handiwork Exploded View - Materials
The idea is about how to design a series of new walls that can fulfill expectations. First, the new walls can be the support of old walls from the other direction, so the old walls will not affect the continuous underground space that connects underpass. Second, all space can be divided into four parts by the intersection between new walls and old walls. The idea can extend the spatial experience. Third, the building is part of the landscape. From natural landscape to culture landscape, the structure can play an appropriate role in this border.
Activity of Woodworking
Reading Room &Under Square
Support and Underpass
> to Underpass
> to Underpass
> to Underpass
> to Underpass
> to Underpass
Gameroom
Store of Vegetable Garden
In Alabawan, it is hard to transport massive or complicated tools into the site because the pathway is too narrow. So consideration of handiwork is necessary.
When we dig out the whole, we can use two units of slightly different height of wood structure to support the two old walls. When one unit is supporting, we are also constructing a lower unit that is the support of next stage. After the underground space is finished, we can begin to construct the new concrete walls and wood structure.
> to Underpass
> to Underpass
> to Underpass
> to Underpass
Section C.
Section D.
Section E.
Section F.
Section G.
Step 1.
Woodworking
Black work of Support
Concrete Wall
Woodworking of Stairs
Destroy parts of the old wall (abandoned Community Centre)
Dig out the soil inthe inside areaof old walls
Input the supportunits
Form the underground space
Construct newconcrete walls
Construct the structure ofwoodworking
Construct the walls and floors ofwoodworking
Step 2.
Step 3.
Step 4.
Step 5.
Step 6.
Step 2.
Public or Private The End
C a r P e o p l e T r e e R i v e r P a v e m e n t S t o o l U r i n a l W a s h A B C D E F G H
9 . A + E + G + D
8 . A + F + E + H + D
7 . B + E + F
6 . B + E + D
5 . B + E + D
4 . B + H + E + F
3 . A + F + E + D
2 . B + E + F
1 . B + H + E + C
1 7 . B + E + H + D
1 6 . B + E + C + D
1 5 . B + E + G + D
1 4 . A + F + E + D
1 3 . B + H + E + G + D
1 2 . B + E + D
1 1 . B + E + F
1 0 . B + G + E + D
It is a Public Lavatory that locates on a site between river and road. The situation makes an issue about public and private. The view of river is excellent of public space, so we have to encourage more possibilities of this public (or open) space. However, a public lavatory always looks like a jail which is dark and private. The project is to challenge the basic function of public lavatory that would create a harmonious relationship between road, public lavatory and view of river.
Between Road and River, the steel plate is twisted into different form that follows the allocation of lavatory necessary function.
Form the Steel Plate into Space
Detail Design - Electric and Water Support
A
River
River
Road
Plant
B A - B Section
Public or Private The End
C a r P e o p l e T r e e R i v e r P a v e m e n t S t o o l U r i n a l W a s h A B C D E F G H
9 . A + E + G + D
8 . A + F + E + H + D
7 . B + E + F
6 . B + E + D
5 . B + E + D
4 . B + H + E + F
3 . A + F + E + D
2 . B + E + F
1 . B + H + E + C
1 7 . B + E + H + D
1 6 . B + E + C + D
1 5 . B + E + G + D
1 4 . A + F + E + D
1 3 . B + H + E + G + D
1 2 . B + E + D
1 1 . B + E + F
1 0 . B + G + E + D
It is a Public Lavatory that locates on a site between river and road. The situation makes an issue about public and private. The view of river is excellent of public space, so we have to encourage more possibilities of this public (or open) space. However, a public lavatory always looks like a jail which is dark and private. The project is to challenge the basic function of public lavatory that would create a harmonious relationship between road, public lavatory and view of river.
Between Road and River, the steel plate is twisted into different form that follows the allocation of lavatory necessary function.
Form the Steel Plate into Space
Detail Design - Electric and Water Support
A
River
River
Road
Plant
B A - B Section
Matsu IslandThe Border between Taiwan and China2009 SummerYang-Yu Huang
Taiwan IslandThe Presentation of D.P.V. City2008 SummerHan-Yin Hsu
Taiwan IslandThe Harbor2009 AutumnYang-Yu Huang
The End
Yang-Yu Huang
Resume
Born: 10/12 Libra, 1984, Taipei City, Taiwan
Address: 2F., No.19, Ln.118, Anju St., Da’an Dist., Taipei City 106, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Mobile: [+886] - 989 - 179 - 512
E-mail: hata007@ hotmail.com
2004 - 2008: Dept. of Architecture, Tamkang University, Taipei, Taiwan
Spring / 2009: Publication - Special Issue of Young Talented Architecture Design Award
Summer / 2008: Nominated for the Young Talented Architectural Design Award
Summer / 2008: 40th Graduation Exhibition in Red Theatre Tamkang University Architecture Dept.
Winter / 2007: EA4 Annual Exhibition of Tamkang University Architecture Dept.
Photoshop, Illustrator, Auto CAD, 3D Max, Sketch Up, Photography, Painting
2008 - 2009: Matsu Island, ChinaSpring / 2007: Ho-Ping Island, TaiwanSummer / 2006: Tokyo, JapanAutumn / 2005: Hong-Kong, ChinaSummer / 2005: Bangkok and Pattaya , Tailand
Summer / 2009: Competition - Reconstruction of Yilan Distillery Min-Chin Weng & Associates Responsible for 3D Model Drawing
Summer / 2008 - Summer / 2009: Troop of Army, it is located in Matsu Island
Summer / 2008: Competition - Luodong Township Office Building Chang-Chun Lin & Associates Responsible for 3D Model Drawing
Summer / 2007: Publication - “Rustic & Poetic - An Emerging Generation of Architecture in Postwar Taiwan” Responsible for CAD Drawing and Model Making
Summer / 2006: Competition - Reconstruction of Catholic Church Meng-Wei Huang & Associates Responsible for 3D Model Drawing
Education
Work Experience
Skills
Traveling Experience
Awards and Exhibition
Matsu IslandThe Border between Taiwan and China2009 SummerYang-Yu Huang
Taiwan IslandThe Presentation of D.P.V. City2008 SummerHan-Yin Hsu
Taiwan IslandThe Harbor2009 AutumnYang-Yu Huang
The End
Yang-Yu Huang
Resume
Born: 10/12 Libra, 1984, Taipei City, Taiwan
Address: 2F., No.19, Ln.118, Anju St., Da’an Dist., Taipei City 106, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Mobile: [+886] - 989 - 179 - 512
E-mail: hata007@ hotmail.com
2004 - 2008: Dept. of Architecture, Tamkang University, Taipei, Taiwan
Spring / 2009: Publication - Special Issue of Young Talented Architecture Design Award
Summer / 2008: Nominated for the Young Talented Architectural Design Award
Summer / 2008: 40th Graduation Exhibition in Red Theatre Tamkang University Architecture Dept.
Winter / 2007: EA4 Annual Exhibition of Tamkang University Architecture Dept.
Photoshop, Illustrator, Auto CAD, 3D Max, Sketch Up, Photography, Painting
2008 - 2009: Matsu Island, ChinaSpring / 2007: Ho-Ping Island, TaiwanSummer / 2006: Tokyo, JapanAutumn / 2005: Hong-Kong, ChinaSummer / 2005: Bangkok and Pattaya , Tailand
Summer / 2009: Competition - Reconstruction of Yilan Distillery Min-Chin Weng & Associates Responsible for 3D Model Drawing
Summer / 2008 - Summer / 2009: Troop of Army, it is located in Matsu Island
Summer / 2008: Competition - Luodong Township Office Building Chang-Chun Lin & Associates Responsible for 3D Model Drawing
Summer / 2007: Publication - “Rustic & Poetic - An Emerging Generation of Architecture in Postwar Taiwan” Responsible for CAD Drawing and Model Making
Summer / 2006: Competition - Reconstruction of Catholic Church Meng-Wei Huang & Associates Responsible for 3D Model Drawing
Education
Work Experience
Skills
Traveling Experience
Awards and Exhibition
YANG-YU HUANG
2003 - 2008Academic Work
Thanks for Your Review