PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE BLACK SEA REGION - … AR-2016.pdf · inspection from 1 st January 2017 to harmonize further its inspection scheme with the Paris MOU, ... on port State

PORT STATE CONTROL

IN THE BLACK SEA REGION

Annual Report 2016

BLACK SEA PORT STATE CONTROL SECRETARIAT

ISTANBUL / TURKEY

This work may be reproduced in whole or part subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgement of thesource but not for commercial usage or sale.

Further information may be obtained from:

Black Sea Port State Control SecretariatKemankes Karamustafapasa Mah. Kemankes Cad.No: 63, Kat: 4/412 Beyoglu 34425 Istanbul / TurkeyTel : +90 212 249 1728Fax : +90 212 292 5277e-mail : [email protected] : www.bsmou.org

This report will be available at www.bsmou.org

DISCLAIMER

The inspection and detention data in this publication are derived from data input by the memberAuthorities. The BS MOU (its member Authorities, the Secretariat and BSIS Manager) will not beheld liable for any loss, damage or harm resulting from the use of information contained in thispublication, or any reliance on the data accuracy, completeness or timeliness.

PSC IN THE BLACK SEA REGION Annual Report 2016

İ

Foreword

We are pleased to present the sixteenth issue of the Annual Report on Port State Control in the Black Sea region

which is published under the auspices of the Port State Control Committee of the Black Sea MOU.

Port State Control is of particular importance to the BS MOU member Authorities due to the role of shipping in

region’s trade, the sensitivity of the Black Sea basin and its coastline to environmental damage. PSC inspections

are conducted to ensure that foreign ships visiting the Black Sea ports are seaworthy, do not pose a pollution risk,

provide a healthy and safe environment and comply with relevant international regulations and within the scope of

the member Authorities’ national governing laws and regulations.

At the 17th meeting of the Port State Control Committee in Sochi, Russian Federation, April 2016, the BS MOU

decided to introduce a new inspection scheme incorporation of expanded inspection to initial and more detailed

inspection from 1st January 2017 to harmonize further its inspection scheme with the Paris MOU, to the highest

level.

This PSC Annual report covers the period between 1st January and 31st December 2016. During this period the BS

MOU member Authorities conducted a total of 5,066 initial inspections, representing 1.4 per cent increase as

compared with 4,997 initial inspections in 2015. The regional inspection rate is 69.80% which is 0.22 per cent

increase as compared with 2015. A total of 229 detentions were warranted to ships found with serious deficiencies.

This represents a detention percentage of 4.52% which is 5.05 per cent increase as compared with 218 detentions

in 2015.

During 2016 a total of 18,266 deficiencies were recorded. The average number of deficiencies per inspection was

3.61; resulting in a 0.01 deficiency point decrease.

The most significant number of operational deficiencies found in 2016 was in the area of safety of navigation, life

saving appliances followed by fire safety measures and health protection, medical care, social security making up

50.1 per cent of the total deficiencies found.

International Safety Management (ISM) related issues accounted for 8.27 per cent of all detainable deficiencies in

the 2016 reporting period which is 1.0 per cent increase compared with 2015. Thereby this area remains a

significant concern and the BS MOU continues to scrutinize vessels coming into region for weaknesses in their

Safety Management Systems.

In further promoting safety and environment protection, Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC)s are conducted

in conjunction with the Paris and Tokyo Memorandas. Between 1st September 2016 and 30th November 2016, a

CIC was carried out with respect to the Cargo Securing Arrangements with Tokyo MOU, IO MOU and Vinã del Mar

Agreement.

Through the launching new inspection scheme the BS MOU will further increase the pressure on the substandard

ships to encourage them to improve their performance or to force them to leave the region.

Mrs. Natalia KHARCHENKOChairperson

BS MOU PSC Committee

Hüseyin YÜCESecretary

BS MOU Secretariat

Number of Detentions 367 329 278 286 249 215 184 151 218 229

Deficencies / Inspection 5.51 4.87 4.76 4.35 4.13 3.89 3.74 3.60 3.62 3.61

Detainable Deficiencies / Detention 3.84 4.47 4.09 4.37 3.54 3.11 3.42 3.35 3.37 3.59

10 Year Summary of Inspection, Detentions and Deficiency Rate

Annual Report 2016 PSC IN THE BLACK SEA REGION

İİ

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Number of Inspections 4499 5161 4805 4929 4657 4607 5080 5092 4997 5066

Detention % 8.16 6.37 5.79 5.80 5.35 4.67 3.62 2.97 4.36 4.52

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Number of Deficiencies 24778 25118 22885 21464 19255 17916 19022 18350 18094 18266

Deficiencies / Inspection 7.61 7.17 7.12 6.73 6.10 5.97 5.75 6.01 6.40 6.42with Deficiencies

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Number of Detainable Deficiencies 1408 1472 1136 1251 881 669 630 506 734 822


1

Table of Contents

Foreword

2016 Annual ReportOverview

Port State Control Committee

Black Sea Information System (BSIS)

Concentrated Inspection Campaign

Training

Interregional Cooperation

PSC Inspections 2016Regional Inspection Data

Inspection Data by Authority

Inspection Data by Flag

Inspection Data by Recognized Organization

Inspection Data by Ship Type

Inspection Data by Deficiency

2016 Maritime Labour Convention Results

Port State Inspection Data for 2016

Statistical Data 2014-2016

List of TablesTable 1- Summary of 2016 Inspection and Trends as Compared with the Previous Year

Table 2- Inspection Data by Authority and Region

Table 3- Inspections Data by Ship Risk Profile

Table 4- Top 5 Inspections by Flag of the Ships

Table 5- 2016 Detentions Per Flag, Exceeding Average Detention Percentage

Table 6- 2016 MLC Results by Ship Flag, Ship Type and Ship Age

Table 7- Inspection Data by Flag

Table 8- Inspection Data by Recognized Organizations

Table 9- Inspection Data by Ship Type

Table 10- Inspection Data by Type of Deficiencies

List of FiguresFigure 1- Inspection and Detention Rates by Authority and Region

Figure 2- Share of Inspections, Inspections with Deficiencies and Detentions of Members as

Percentage of Regional Total

Figure 3- Ratio of the Share of Inspections to the Share of Detentions and Deficiencies by the Flags

Figure 4- Ratio of the Share of Inspections to the Share of RO Related Detentions and to the Share of

RO Related Detainable Deficiencies

Figure 5- Share of Inspections to the Share of Detentions and Share of Deficiencies for Ship Types

with Detentions

İ

22

3

4

4

5

5

66

6

8

10

10

12

12

14

19

6

7

8

8

9

13

14

16

17

18

7

7

9

10

11


2

2016 Annual ReportOverview

The Governments of Black Sea States in the “Strategic Action Plan for the Rehabilitation and Protection of the Black

Sea (adopted at the Ministerial Conference held in Istanbul, 30-31 October, 1996) decided to launch a harmonised

system of port State control through the adoption of a Memorandum of Understanding on port State control.

The Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control in the Black Sea Region (BS MOU) was completed and

signed in Istanbul, Turkey on 7 April 2000 by representatives of the Maritime Authorities of Bulgaria, Georgia,

Romania, the Russian Federation, Turkey and Ukraine.

On December 19, 2000 the Memorandum entered into force in the Black Sea region for three maritime States

accepted the BS MOU. By December 12, 2002 the BS MOU entered into effect for all maritime States in the Black

Sea, namely: Bulgaria, Georgia, Romania, the Russian Federation, Turkey and Ukraine.

The Port State Control Committee established under the Memorandum monitors and controls implementation and

on-going operation of the Memorandum. The Committee consists of representatives of the maritime Authorities of

the six member States and observers representatives from the International Maritime Organization (IMO), the

International Labour Organization (ILO). The Committee granted observer status to the USCG, Paris MOU, MED

MOU, West and Central Africa MOU, Riyadh MOU, the State Maritime Administration of the Republic of Azerbaijan

and Commission on the Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution.

To coordinate daily activity of the organization, on the kind proposal by the Maritime Administration of Turkey, the

MOU Authorities decided to establish Headquarter and the Secretariat in Istanbul.

The Russian Federation has developed and launched the Black Sea Information System (BSIS), PSC computerized

information system for the Black Sea MOU, basing on the technique used for the Asia Pacific Computerized

Information System (APCIS), PSC information system for the Tokyo MOU, which was also developed by the Russia

Federation. The BSIS provides necessary tools to assist PSC Officers to conduct inspections. PSC Officers use a

comprehensive database which contains data received from a variety of sources on a large number of vessels.

This information includes the general particulars of a vessel, and its PSC inspection history.

To provide industry with the MOU news, procedures and inspection results the Black Sea MOU launched the internet

web-site at www.bsmou.org containing general information on MOU, regularly updated detention list. Taking into

account of successful operation of the BSIS, it was decided to start open publication of PSC inspection results in

internet through a direct link to the MOU database providing on-the-fly inspection results.

This annual report outlines recent activities on port State control in the Black Sea region, as well as international

perspectives on port State control and includes the statistical port State inspection data conducted by the member

Authorities of the BS MOU during the year 2016.

The Seventeenth Meeting of the Black Sea Port State Control Committee was held in Sochi, Russian Federation from

12 to 14 April 2016. The meeting was chaired by Capt. Vakhtang TAVBERIDZE - Harbour Master of Poti port Maritime

Transport Agency of Georgia.

The meeting was attended by the member Authorities: Bulgaria, Georgia, Romania, the Russian Federation, Turkey

and Ukraine. Representatives of the Republic of Azerbaijan and ABUJA MOU participated in the meeting as

observers. The Mediterranean MOU was represented by the delegation of Turkey.

Observers from the International Maritime Organization (IMO), the International Labour Organization (ILO), USCG,

Paris MOU, Riyadh MOU and the Commission on the Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution were not able to

attend.

Member Authorities presented information about their national arrangements for port State control activities, including

important organizational changes and availability of dedicated PSC structures.

In order further harmonize with the Paris MOU regarding qualification criteria for PSCOs, inspection types and clear

grounds the Committee agreed to amend:

- qualification criteria for PSCO and adopted “Minimum Criteria for PSCOs” taking into account

of the Paris MOU Annex 6; and

- its inspection scheme by incorporation expanded inspection into the initial and more detailed

inspection, and to make consequent amendment to its procedures with an effective date of

1st January 2017.

The Committee approved amendments to the guidelines for:

- MLC, 2006

- Guideline RO responsibility

- Guideline for ISM Code

- Guidance for checking the structure of bulk carriers and oil tankers;

- Definitions and Abbreviations; and

The Committee considered, inspection scheme in the light of new inspection scheme, there will be three type of

inspections: initial, detailed and expanded inspection and necessity to verify harmonization of the coding system

with the Paris MOU and Tokyo MOU.


3

Port State Control Committee


4

The Committee agreed on the BS MOU Policy on the Training of New Entrant PSC Officers and the Policy on the

Standards for Professional Development Scheme for the PSC Officers.

The Committee agreed to conclude the agreement on the provision of PSC inspection data to EQUASIS.

The Committee considered the report on the concentrated inspection campaign (CIC) on Crew Familiarization for

Enclosed Space Entry, future CICs and agreed to:

- approve report of the 2015 CIC on the Crew Familiarization for enclosed Space entry;

- carry out CIC on Cargo Securing arrangement in 2016 jointly with the Tokyo MOU; the

arrangements for the subject CIC.

- plan to conduct CIC on Safety of Navigation, incl. ECDIS in 2017.

- take decision to conduct CIC on MLC, 2006 in 2018; at its next meeting.

The Committee unanimously elected Mrs. Natalia KHARCENKO (Russian Federation) and Mr. Tamay ÇETIN (Turkey)

as Chairperson and Vice Chairman of the Committee.

The Committee agreed to conduct the BS MOU Port State Control Committee 18th meeting in Turkey April 2017.

Black Sea Information System (BSIS)

The Black Sea Information System has been established in the Russian Federation, for the purpose of exchanging

information on port State inspections, in order to make available to Authorities information on inspection of ships

in other regional ports to assist them in their selection of foreign flag ships to be inspected and in the exercise of

port State control on selected ships; and provide effective information exchange facilities regarding port State

control in the region.

As the further step for providing more transparent and timely information on the BS MOU PSC activities, the

Committee gave its approvals to on-line publication of the ship risk profile, PSC inspection and detention data on

the Memorandum web-site.

Concentrated Inspection Campaign

From 1st September 2016 to 30th November 2016, the BS MOU carried out a Concentrated Inspection Campaign

(CIC) on Cargo Securing Arrangements. This campaign involved all member States of the BS MOU and was

conducted in conjunction with the Tokyo MOU, IO MOU and Vinã del Mar Agreement. The Tokyo MOU Guidelines

and Questionnaire were utilized.

During the course of the campaign a total of 931 inspections of individual ships using the CIC questionnaire. Of

this quantity 46 were detained (4.94%). The CIC inspections, had no CIC-related detentions at all.

Concentrated Inspection Campaign in 2017

The Committee agreed to participate into the CIC on Safety of Navigation including ECDIS during the period of 1st

September to 30th November 2017 and to request the Secretariat to report progress and developments on the 2017

CIC.


5

One PSCO from Turkey participated into the Expert Training on Safety and Environment, the Hague, the Netherlands,

from 1 to 4 March 2016. One PSCO from Ukraine participated into the Tokyo MOU General Training Course for

PSCO, Yokohama, Japan from 22 August to 16 September 2016. One PSCO from Georgia participated into the

Expert Training on Human Element for PSC officers, the Hague, the Netherlands, from 4 to 7 October 2016. One

PSCO from Ukraine participated into the Indian Ocean MOU and Tokyo MOU Expert Mission Training Course on

PSC, Bandar Abbas, the Islamic Republic of Iran, from 5 to 16 November 2016.

PSCO Exchange Programme

Within the scope of the regional and interregional PSCO Exchange Programmes seven PSC officer exchanges

were conducted in 2016, one PSCO from Georgia visited Bulgaria, one PSCO from the Russia visited Bulgaria,

and PSCOs from the Turkey visited Bulgaria, Romania, Greece, Italy and Slovenia.

Training

The BS MOU currently has six members, some with dual or even triple membership: Bulgaria, Romania and the

Russian Federation with the Paris MOU, while the Russian Federation is also a member of the Tokyo MOU, with

Turkey there is further tie with the MED MOU.

In order to further strengthen co-operation with IMO, an agreement for co-operation was concluded with IMO, as

an Intergovernmental Organization, which allows the BS MOU (and other MOUs) to submit papers and attend IMO

meetings in its own rights. The BS MOU is represented at the IMO III sub-committe meetings and submitting its

reports.

The BS MOU is accepted as an observer to several regional PSC agreements, that is, Paris MOU, Tokyo MOU,

Mediterranean MOU, Viňa del Mar Agreement, and Indian Ocean MOU.

The BS MOU was represented by the Secretary at the Paris MOU PSCC49 meeting which was held in Haugesund,

Norway, from 23 to 27 May 2016.

The BS MOU was represented by the Secretary in the 3rd session of the Implementation of IMO Instruments (III)

Sub-Committee (from 18 to 22 July 2016) which was held in IMO Headquarter.

The BS MOU was represented by the Republic of Turkey at the PSCC18 meeting of the MED MOU which was held

in Aqaba, Jordan from 25 to 27 October 2016.

The BS MOU was represented by the Russian Federation at the PSCC27 meeting of the Tokyo MOU which was

held in Hobart, Australia from 17 to 20 October 2016.

The BS MOU represented by Turkey at the 30th meeting of the Paris MOU Technical Evaluation Group, which were

held in Southampton, United Kingdom from 6 to 8 December 2016.

Interregional Cooperation

Detentions Rate 5.17% 5.66% 0.5%

RO Related Detainable Deficency 47 41 -6 (56.7%)

Detainable Deficiency / Detention 3.37 3.59 0.22 (6.6%)

Deficiency Rate 3.62 3.61 -0.02 (0.4%)

Detainable Deficiencies 734 822 88 (12.0%)

Deficiencies Total Deficiencies 18094 18266 172 (1.0%)

Inspection Rate 69.58% 69.80% 0.2%

Individual Ships 3813 3761 -52 (1.4%)

Inspections Total PSC Inspections 4997 5066 69 (1.4%)

Inspection with Deficiencies 2825 2845 20 (0.7%)

% Inspections with Deficiencies 56.53% 56.16% -0.4%

% of Total Inspections 4.36% 4.52% 0.16%

Total Detentions 218 229 11 (5.1%)

Detentions Individual Ships 197 213 16 (8%)

Table 1- Summary of 2016 Inspection and Trends as Compared with the Previous Year


6

PSC Inspections 2016Regional Inspection Data

During the 2016 calendar year 5,388 individual ship visited inspection ports in the Black Sea region in which 3,761

(69.80%) individual ships inspected and 213 (5.66%) individual ships detained. The number of individual ships

inspected in 2016 (3,761) decreased 1.4 per cent compared with the number of individual ships inspected in 2015

(3,813) despite to 1.7 per cent decrease of the individual ship visits in 2016 as compared with 5,480 individual ship

visits in 2015.

5,066 inspections carried out onboard 3,761 individual ships registered by 81 flag Administration. The number of

inspections in 2016 (5,066) increased compared with 2015 (4,997).

The overall detention percentage in the region was 4.36% in 2015; in 2016 it increased up to 4.52% as a per cent of

inspections, rather than the number of individual ships inspected to take into account that many ships are detained

more than once during any one year. Regional detention rate (percentage of number of individual ships inspected) is

5.66% which is higher than 5.17% in 2015.

The number of ships detained in 2016 for deficiencies clearly hazardous to safety, health or environmental amounted

to 229. It compares with the number of detained 218 in 2015, 151 in 2014. Number of inspections decreased 69 (1.4%),

total number of detentions increased 5.1% which resulted 0.16 per cent increase in detention percentage in 2016.

Table 1 displays summary of the 2016 inspection data and observed changes compared with the previous year.

2015 2016 Change Compare 2015

Ships Visits Individual Ships 5480 5388 -92 (1.7%)

Inspection Data by Authority

The BS MOU member Authorities contributions into the regional inspection efforts displayed with Table 2. Member

Authorities inspection rates (percent of number of individual ships inspected) varied between 25.41% and 78.84%.

Figure 1 displays inspection and detention rates for 2016 by member Authorities and in the region. Detention

percentage of the member Authorities are varied from 0.64 to 11.75 per cent. Per cent of inspections with

deficiencies varied from 35.67 per cent up to 72.31 per cent in the region. As a result of shipping activity the

greatest number of PSC inspections were undertaken in the Ukraine and the Russian Federation ports in 2016.

Georgia 674 337 474 218 1,669 14 14 50.00 4.15 2.95 45.99 3.52 9.36 0

Russia (1) 1,938 1,528 1,809 1,255 9,485 111 107 78.84 7.00 6.14 69.38 5.24 35.71 0

Ukraine 2,340 1,378 1,556 555 2,340 10 9 58.89 0.65 0.64 35.67 1.50 30.71 0


7

Table 2- Inspection Data by Authority and Region

Bulgaria 1,346 342 351 228 1,138 14 14 25.41 4.09 3.99 64.96 3.24 6.93 1

Romania 1,780 481 502 363 2,317 59 58 27.02 12.06 11.75 72.31 4.62 9.91 5

Turkey (1) 1,041 324 374 226 1,317 21 20 31.12 6.17 5.61 60.43 3.52 7.38 7

Regional 5,388 3,761 5,066 2,845 18,266 229 213 69.80 5.66 4.52 56.16 3.61 13

AUTHORITY NU

MB

ER

OF

IND

IVID

UA

L S

HIP

VIS

ITS

NU

MB

ER

OF

IND

IVID

UA

LS

HIP

S I

NS

PEC

TED

NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H D

EFI

CIE

NC

IES

NU

MB

ER

OF

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

DETE

NTI

ON

S W

ITH

RO

RELA

TED

DETA

INA

BLE

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

% O

F M

OU

TO

TAL

AV

ER

AG

E N

O. O

F D

EFI

CIE

NC

IES

PER

IN

SP

EC

TIO

N

% O

F IN

SP

EC

TIO

NS

WIT

HD

EFI

CIE

NC

IES

DETE

NTI

ON

PER

CEN

TAG

E (4

)

DETE

NTI

ON

RA

TE (3

)

INS

PEC

TIO

N R

ATE

(2)

NU

MB

ER

OF

IND

IVID

UA

LS

HIP

S D

ETA

INED

NU

MB

ER

OF

DETE

NTI

ON

S

(1) Data only Black Sea Ports, (2) Individual ships inspected as per cent of individual ships visited(3) Individual ships detained as per cent of individual ships inspected, (4) Detentions as per cent of inspections.

Figure 2- Share of Inspections, Inspections with Deficiencies and Detentions of Members as Percentage of Regional Total

Figure 1- Inspection and Detention Rates by Authority and Region

In order to determine level of contributions of the member Authorities into the regional inspections, share of

inspections, share of inspections with deficiencies and share of detentions presented in Figure 2.

Malta 625 12.51% 620 12.24% -5 -0.8% 13.17%

Ukraine 207 13.3 1334 85.7 15 1.0 0 0.0 1556

HRS SRS LRS SRP UNKNOWN NUMBER OF

AUTHORITY NUMBER % NUMBER % NUMBER % NUMBER % INSPECTIONS

HRS SRS LRS SRP UNKNOWN

NUMBER % NUMBER % NUMBER % NUMBER %

SHIP RISK PROFILE (SRP) TOTAL

Liberia 369 7.38% 383 7.56% 14 3.8% 7.78%

Marshall Islands 420 8.41% 442 8.72% 22 5.2% 8.99%

Turkey 411 8.22% 427 8.43% 16 3.9% 8.19%

2015 2016 DIFFERENCE 2014-2016


8

Inspection Data by Flag

2016 Inspections were carried out on ships registered under 81 flags. The flag State with largest number of ships

inspected in the region was Panama with 697 (13.76%) inspection followed by Malta with 620 (12.24%) and Marshall

Islands with 442 (8.72%) which constitute 1,759 (34.72%) of total inspections. Table 4 presents top 5 PSC

inspections by flags in 2015 and in 2016.

In 2016, ships registered under 33 foreign flags were observed to have deficiencies sufficiently serious to impair

the seaworthiness and warrant detention. High detention percentage observed Moldova (17.07%), Tanzania

(14.81%) followed by Togo (13.20%), Comoros (12.50%) and Cambodia (12.24%), flagged vessels. Table 5

illustrates inspections data by flags exceeding average detention percentage (with inspections more than 20).

Figure 3 presents ratio of the share of inspections to the share of detentions and deficiencies which indicates

relative level of the detention and deficiencies. Liberia, followed by Marshall Islands and Malta performing well

concerning detentions. Marshall Islands followed by Singapore and Cyprus performing well concerning

deficiencies.

Table 4- Top 5 Inspections by Flag of the Ships

FLAG NUMBER SHARE NUMBER SHARE NUMBER % SHARE

Panama 664 13.29% 697 13.76% 33 5.0% 13.91%

Turkey 102 27.3 271 72.5 1 0.3 0 0.0 374

Romania 114 22.7 381 75.9 5 1.0 2 0.4 502

Russian Federation 224 12.4 1568 86.7 13 0.7 4 0.2 1809

Georgia 108 22.8 364 76.8 2 0.4 0 0.0 474

Table 3- Inspection Data by Ship Risk Profile

Bulgaria 70 19.9 277 78.9 2 0.6 2 0.6 351

REGION 825 16.3 4,195 82.8 38 0.8 8 0.2 5,066

Breakdown of inspections by ship risk profile presented in Table 3. Majority of the inspected ships are standard

risk ship (SRP)s 4,195 (83.8%), followed by high ship risk ship (HRS)s 825 (16.3%).

Vanuatu 28 23 156 2 82.1 7.14 2.62 3.03 -1.33

Togo 106 93 888 14 87.7 13.21 8.69 13.43 9.07

Turkey 427 294 1904 39 68.9 9.13 4.61 7.62 3.26

Tanzania, United Republic of 81 77 793 12 95.1 14.81 10.29 16.22 11.86

Sierra Leone 95 79 602 9 83.2 9.47 4.95 8.11 3.75

Russian Federation 255 165 831 12 64.7 4.71 0.19 8.56 4.20

Panama 697 423 2661 34 60.7 4.88 0.36 3.31 -1.05

Moldova, Republic of 123 103 973 21 83.7 17.07 12.55 12.77 8.41

Congo, the Democratic Republic of the 27 21 192 2 77.8 7.41 2.89

Comoros 80 62 590 10 77.5 12.50 7.98 6.98 2.62

Saint Kitts and Nevis 53 35 237 5 66.0 9.43 4.91 8.00 3.64

Portugal 22 14 69 1 63.6 4.55 0.03 0.00 -4.36

Palau 53 35 367 5 66.0 9.43 4.91 19.15 14.79

Cook Islands 126 100 716 8 79.4 6.35 1.83 1.94 -2.42

Congo 29 24 246 3 82.8 10.34 5.82


9

Table 5- 2016 Detentions Per Flag, Exceeding Average Detention Percentage(Number of Inspections>20, with a Detention Percentage Exceeding 4.52%)

Cambodia 49 40 291 6 81.6 12.24 7.72 10.00 5.64

FLAG NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

NO

. OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H D

EFIC

IEN

CIE

S

NU

MB

ER

OF

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

NU

MB

ER

OF

DETE

NTI

ON

S

% O

F IN

SP

ECTI

ON

S

WIT

H D

EFIC

IEN

CIE

S

DETE

NTI

ON

% 2

016

EXC

ESS

OF

AV

ERA

GE

2015

DETE

NTI

ON

% 2

015

EXC

ESS

OF

AV

ERA

GE

2016

Figure 3- Ratio of the Share of Inspections to the Share of Detentions and Deficiencies by the Flags(Inspections>30 Detentions>2)


10

Figure 4- Ratio of the Share of Inspections to the Share of RO Related Detentions and to the Share of RO Related DetainableDeficiencies (Inspections with RO Related Detentions)

Inspection Data by Recognized Organization

The majority of ships inspected are in class with the Nippon Kaiji Kyokai 1,120 (15.1%), Lloyd’s Register 864

(11.63%), Bureau Veritas 833 (11.2%) and followed by, DNV GL AS 796 (10.7%) and Russian Maritime Register of

Shipping 586 (7.89%) inspections.

Figure 4 shows how ROs inspected performed with regards to RO related detentions and RO related detainable

deficiencies. Lower shares of RO inspections compared with RO related detentions and RO related detainable

deficiencies indicates that RO is underperforming with respect to RO related detentions and detainable

deficiencies.

Chemical Tanker 366 7.32 347 6.85 -19 -5.19 6.66

Bulk Carrier 1709 34.20 1737 34.29 28 1.64 21.39

2015 2016 DIFFERENCE 2014-2016


11

Inspection Data by Ship Type

When considering the breakdown of ships inspected by ship type, largest group of the ship inspected during 2016

were general cargo/multi purpose ships with 1,910 (37.7%) inspections; bulk carrier 1,737 (34.3%) and oil tanker

666 (13.1%) were also inspected which represent 82.9 per cent of inspections. 2016 top 5 inspection by ship type

presented below.

Majority of detained ships were type of general cargo/multi purpose ships with 146 (63.8%) detentions, bulk carriers

with 53 (23.1%) detentions and Ro-Ro cargo ships with 7 (3.1%) detentions, followed by chemical tanker with 6

(2.6%) detentions, which were accounted for 92.6 per cent of the total detentions.

Higher per cent of detentions were with Ro-Ro cargo ship (13.2%), tugboat (12.0%), livestock carrier (1.1%),

followed by refrigerated cargo ships 18.3% and general cargo/multi-purpose ships (7.6%) (number of inspections

more than 10).

Figure 5 shows how the ship types inspected performed with regards to detentions and deficiencies. Higher share

of detentions and deficiencies compared with share of inspections indicated that type of ship underperforming

with respect to detentions and deficiencies.

Container 152 3.04 157 3.10 5 3.29 3.11

SHIP TYPES NUMBER SHARE NUMBER SHARE NUMBER % SHARE

General Cargo/Multipurpose Ship 1834 36.70 1910 37.70 76 4.14 38.75

Oil Tanker 571 11.43 666 13.15 95 16.64 11.84

Figure 5- Share of Inspections to the Share of Detentions and Share of Deficiencies for Ship Types with Detentions

Fire Safety 92 12.5% 99 12.0% 7 7.6 11.8%

Emergency Systems 109 14.9% 110 13.4% 1 0.9 12.9%

2015 2016 DIFFERENCE 2014-2016


12

Number of ISM related deficiencies were 443 which accounted for 2.43 per cent of the deficiencies, 293 marine

pollution MARPOL Annex I related deficiencies observed accounting 1.60 per cent of the total deficiencies.

A total 822 detainable deficiencies and 41 RO related detainable deficiencies were recorded during the port State

control inspections. 4.5 per cent of total deficiencies in 2016 were detainable deficiencies, 4.98 per cent of

detainable deficiencies in 2016 were RO related.

Majority of the detainable deficiencies found upon inspections in 2016 were related to safety of navigation (17.0%),

emergency systems (13.4%) lifesaving appliances (12.8%), followed by fire safety measures (12.0%), and ISM

(8.3%). These five categories make up 63.5% of the total detainable deficiencies found. 2016. Top 5 category of

detainable deficiencies presented below.

ISM 54 7.4% 68 8.3% 14 25.9 8.1%

DETAINABLE DEFICIENCIES NUMBER SHARE NUMBER SHARE NUMBER SHARE SHARE

Safety of Navigation 105 14.3% 140 17.0% 35 33.3 15.4%

Life Saving Appliances 113 15.4% 105 12.8% -8 -7.1 14.4%

Majority of the RO related detainable deficiencies found upon inspection in 2016 were related to fire safety (24.4%),

life saving appliances (22.0%), structural conditions (19.5%), followed by ISM (12.2%) and ship certificates (4.9%).

These five categories make up 82.9% of the total RO related detainable deficiencies found.

2016 Maritime Labour Convention Results

MLC, 2006 compliance is verified during 2,662 PSC inspections carried out in 2016 by Bulgaria, Romania (started

on 24 November 2016) and the Russian Federation and the results are presented in Table 6. This table identifies

the number of MLC 2006-related deficiencies, detainable deficiencies and detentions by ship flag, ship type and

ship age.

PSCOs from Bulgaria, Romania and the Russian Federation identified 2,033 deficiencies related to MLC 2006

issues. This represented 15.7 per cent of the total deficiencies issued and equated to 0.7 deficiency per inspection.

Of the 652 detainable deficiencies 84 were related to MLC detainable deficiencies. This represented 12.9 per cent

of the total detainable deficiencies. Of the 184 detentions 32 (17.4%) were due to the MLC, 2006 related detainable

deficiencies which resulted 1.20 detention percentage.

Health Protection/Medical Care/Social Security 1062 5.9% 1161 8.6% 99 9.3 6.8%

Life Saving Appliances 2604 14.4% 1811 14.5% -793 -30.5 14.2%

2015 2016 DIFFERENCE 2014-2016

Inspection Data by Deficiency

A total of 18,266 deficiencies were recorded during the port State control inspections in 2016. Majority of the

deficiencies found upon inspection in 2016 were related to safety of navigation (17.0%), life saving appliances

(14.5%), fire safety measures (10.1%) and health protection, medical care, social security (8.6%). These four

categories make up 50.3% of the total deficiencies found. 2016. Top 5 category of deficiencies presented below.

Structural Conditions 1161 6.4% 1157 6.4% -4 -0.3 5.4%

CATEGORY OF DEFICIENCIES NUMBER SHARE NUMBER SHARE NUMBER % SHARE

Safety of Navigation 3161 17.5% 2604 17.0% -557 -17.6 17.5%

Fire Safety 1811 10.0% 1062 10.1% -749 -41.4 9.5%

Other Types 964 2257 280 34 42 14 0

Ro-Ro Cargo 39 346 63 9 2 3 2

General Cargo / Multipurpose 800 5987 1007 427 32 111 22

35 + 284 2665 388 197 13 38 7

25 - 29 143 968 148 70 3 24 3

16 - 20 286 1497 267 65 6 22 3

6 - 10 704 2318 334 40 4 22 4

TOTALS 2662 12940 2033 652 42 184 32


13

Table 6- 2016 MLC Results by Ship Flag, Ship Type and Ship Age

TOTALS 2662 12940 2033 652 84 184 32

Tugboat 21 55 6 4 1 1 1

Livestock Carrier 30 233 20 31 1 3 1

Bulk Carrier 808 4062 657 147 6 52 6

SHIP TYPE

Total

Detainable

Deficiencies

MLC

Deficiencies

Total

Deficiencies

Number of

Inspections

MLC

Detainable

Deficiencies

Total

Detentions

MLC

Detentions

30 - 34 232 1923 308 172 12 38 11

21 - 24 152 1185 208 52 1 16 1

11 - 15 491 1640 267 43 2 20 2

0 - 5 370 744 113 13 1 4 1

SHIP AGE

Total

Detainable

Deficiencies

MLC

Deficiencies

Total

Deficiencies

Number of

Inspections

MLC

Detainable

Deficiencies

Total

Detentions

MLC

Detentions

Malta 327 1008 178 12 1 7 1

Cook Islands 56 503 95 34 3 6 3

Comoros 27 296 46 30 4 6 2

TOTALS 2662 12940 2033 652 42 184 32

Liberia 229 827 125 11 1 7 1

Congo 9 133 26 8 1 1 1

Cambodia 7 81 13 19 1 3 1

SHIP TYPE

Total

Detainable

Deficiencies

MLC

Deficiencies

Total

Deficiencies

Number of

Inspections

MLC

Detainable

Deficiencies

Total

Detentions

MLC

Detentions

Panama 352 1976 309 100 4 31 3

Mongolia 12 76 10 8 1 1 1

Micronesia, Federated States of 2 11 4 4 2 1 1

Palau 22 213 25 23 2 4 1

Moldova, Republic of 48 519 69 69 2 13 2

Marshall Islands 270 892 139 12 1 7 1

Other Types 849 3017 415 85 0 28 0

Togo 69 731 119 59 7 12 4

Sierra Leone 47 390 69 20 1 7 1

Turkey 263 1535 291 84 4 37 4

Tanzania, United Republic of 57 642 88 64 2 10 2

Saint Kitts and Nevis 16 90 12 10 5 3 3

India 6 2 10 0 5 0.00 33.33

Ireland 1 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.00

Iran, Islamic Republic of 15 6 110 2 9 13.33 40.00

Hong Kong, China 157 54 252 0 141 0.00 34.39

Greece 146 31 118 0 125 0.00 21.23

Congo, the Democratic Republic of the 27 21 192 2 19 7.41 77.78

Congo 29 24 246 3 17 10.34 82.76

Bermuda (GB) 3 2 6 0 3 0.00 66.67

Bahrain 1 1 4 0 1 0.00 100.00

Croatia 7 1 1 0 6 0.00 14.29

Comoros 80 62 590 10 43 12.50 77.50

Cayman Islands (GB) 9 1 5 0 9 0.00 11.11

Bulgaria 9 6 27 0 7 0.00 66.67

Belize 102 82 511 4 62 3.92 80.39

Barbados 12 9 48 0 9 0.00 75.00

Bahamas 108 39 196 0 95 0.00 36.11

Antigua and Barbuda 107 54 338 3 93 2.80 50.47

Georgia 3 2 13 1 1 33.33 66.67

Faroe Islands 2 1 2 0 1 0.00 50.00

Egypt 16 12 100 1 10 6.25 75.00

Cyprus 57 18 101 1 51 1.75 31.58

Israel 2 1 17 0 2 0.00 50.00

Gibraltar (GB) 22 11 55 0 18 0.00 50.00

Japan 3 0 0 0 3 0.00 0.00

Cook Islands 126 100 716 8 79 6.35 79.37

China 19 2 9 0 17 0.00 10.53

Cambodia 49 40 291 6 38 12.24 81.63

Bolivia 3 2 37 0 2 0.00 66.67

Belgium 5 1 1 0 5 0.00 20.00

Bangladesh 3 2 16 0 3 0.00 66.67

Azerbaijan 9 3 27 0 8 0.00 33.33

Algeria 1 1 3 0 1 0.00 100.00

France 3 1 4 0 2 0.00 33.33

Ethiopia 4 2 11 0 2 0.00 50.00

Denmark 21 16 81 0 18 0.00 76.19

Isle of Man (GB) 24 10 65 1 21 4.17 41.67

Germany 1 1 1 0 1 0.00 100.00

Kazakhstan 1 1 5 0 1 0.00 100.00

Italy 68 23 67 0 56 0.00 33.82


14

Port State Inspection Data for 2016

Table 7- Inspection Data by Flag

FLAG NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H

DETE

NTI

ON

S

NU

MB

ER

OF

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

% O

F

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

DETE

NTI

ON

PER

CEN

TAG

E

NU

MB

ER

OF

IND

IVID

UA

L

SH

IPS

INS

PEC

TED

NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

Latvia 1 1 3 0 1 0.00 100.00

Liberia 383 172 951 7 324 1.83 44.91

Korea, Republic of 2 0 0 0 2 0.00 0.00

Lebanon 13 10 68 1 9 7.69 76.92

Lithuania 2 0 0 0 2 0.00 0.00

Marshall Islands 442 192 974 7 384 1.58 43.44

Malaysia 2 0 0 0 2 0.00 0.00

Libyan Arab Jamahiriya 6 3 9 0 4 0.00 50.00

Malta 620 277 1347 7 475 1.13 44.68

Luxembourg 2 2 7 0 2 0.00 100.00

Micronesia, Federated States of 5 5 22 1 4 20.00 100.00

Netherlands 62 23 86 0 55 0.00 37.10

Mongolia 16 13 116 2 9 12.50 81.25

Norway 19 5 26 0 18 0.00 26.32

Montenegro 5 2 8 0 3 0.00 40.00

Moldova, Republic of 123 103 973 21 72 17.07 83.74

Portugal 22 14 69 1 20 4.55 63.64

Panama 697 423 2661 34 524 4.88 60.69

Qatar 1 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.00

Philippines 18 11 49 2 16 11.11 61.11

Palau 53 35 367 5 27 9.43 66.04

South Africa 1 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.00

Sierra Leone 95 79 602 9 56 9.47 83.16

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 45 30 213 2 31 4.44 66.67

Russian Federation 255 165 831 12 201 4.71 64.71

Turkey 427 294 1904 39 240 9.13 68.85

Togo 106 93 888 14 58 13.21 87.74

Tanzania, United Republic of 81 77 793 12 46 14.81 95.06

Switzerland 11 3 8 0 11 0.00 27.27

Tuvalu 12 8 45 0 9 0.00 66.67

Ukraine 19 16 126 3 15 15.79 84.21

United Arab Emirates 1 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.00

Sri Lanka 1 1 8 0 1 0.00 100.00

Singapore 143 70 344 1 124 0.70 48.95

Saudi Arabia 1 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.00

Saint Kitts and Nevis 53 35 237 5 30 9.43 66.04

Tunisia 2 1 5 0 2 0.00 50.00

Thailand 7 2 16 0 6 0.00 28.57

Syrian Arab Republic 3 2 20 0 2 0.00 66.67

Vanuatu 28 23 156 2 21 7.14 82.14

United Kingdom 19 9 55 0 19 0.00 47.37

United States 1 1 3 0 1 0.00 100.00


15

FLAG NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H

DETE

NTI

ON

S

TOTAL 5066 2845 18266 229 822 4.52 56.16

NU

MB

ER

OF

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

% O

F

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

DETE

NTI

ON

PER

CEN

TAG

E

NU

MB

ER

OF

IND

IVID

UA

L

SH

IPS

INS

PEC

TED

NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

Table 7- Inspection Data by Flag (Continue)

Macosnar Corporation 38 35 235 0 4 0

Lloyd's Register 864 386 1972 0 8 0

Isthmus Bureau of Shipping, S.A. 32 24 200 7 4 1

International Naval Surveys Bureau 124 105 792 0 8 0

Global Marine Bureau Inc. 11 9 67 0 1 0

DNV GL AS 1102 460 2233 0 11 0

Columbus American Register 14 14 129 0 2 0

Bureau Veritas 833 429 2293 1 23 1

American Register of Shipping 12 8 46 0 1 0

Overseas Marine Certification Services 16 11 107 0 2 0

Nippon Kaiji Kyokai 1120 589 3597 5 50 3

Mediterranean Shipping Register (MSR) 15 12 79 0 1 0

Maritime Bureau of Shipping 17 16 156 0 2 0

Shipping Register of Ukraine (SRU) 163 121 958 3 19 2

RINA Services S.p.A. 245 120 632 0 3 0

Phoenix Register of Shipping 86 66 518 0 7 0

Panama Register Corporation 18 13 93 0 0 0

Venezuelan Register of Shipping 59 56 644 3 12 1


16

Korean Register of Shipping 75 35 182 0 0 0

International Register of Shipping 84 65 570 0 7 0

Intermaritime Certification Services, ICS Class 30 25 168 0 1 0

Dromon Bureau of Shipping 172 148 1129 3 18 1

Table 8- Inspection Data by Recognized Organizations (Number of Inspections>10)

Croatian Register of Shipping 10 2 15 0 1 0

China Classification Society 106 24 114 0 0 0

Bulgarian Register of Shipping 78 64 557 2 10 2

American Bureau of Shipping 553 218 1006 0 7 0

RECOGNIZED ORGANIZATION NU

MB

ER

OF

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

Other 93 81 833 4 10 2

National Shipping Adjuster Inc. 49 35 253 0 4 0

Maritime Lloyd (ML) 58 54 540 7 8 1

Russian Maritime Register of Shipping 586 355 1979 4 20 2

Polski Rejestr Statkow (Polish Register of Shipping) 42 31 213 0 1 0

Panama Shipping Registrar Inc. 13 12 92 0 3 0

Panama Maritime Documentation Services 13 10 88 0 3 0

Turkish Lloyd 205 149 969 0 21 0

NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

DETE

NTI

ON

S W

ITH

RO

RELA

TED

DETA

INA

BLE

DEFI

CEN

CIE

S

NU

MB

ER

OF

DETE

NTI

ON

S

NU

MB

ER

OF

RO

RELA

TED

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

Note: Number of inspections and detentions are calculated corresponding to each recognized organization (RO) that issued

certificate(s) for a ship. In case that ship’s certificates were issued more than one ROs, the inspection and detention would be

counted to each of them.

Ro-Ro Cargo 53 42 432 7 31 13.21 79.25

Refrigerated Cargo 12 7 45 1 10 8.33 58.33

Woodchip Carrier 1 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.00

Other Special Activities 14 10 53 1 14 7.14 71.43

Offshore Supply 8 6 21 0 6 0.00 75.00

MODU and FPSO 4 1 4 0 4 0.00 25.00

High Speed Passenger Craft 3 2 13 1 1 33.33 66.67

General Cargo / Multipurpose 1,910 1,354 9,852 146 1,219 7.64 70.89

Container 157 114 640 2 122 1.27 72.61

Chemical Tanker 347 166 625 6 291 1.73 47.84

Tugboat 25 15 74 3 21 12.00 60.00

Ro-Ro Passenger Ship 13 8 68 0 9 0.00 61.54


17

Passenger Ship 4 2 5 0 4 0.00 50.00

Oil Tanker 666 252 1,082 5 550 0.75 37.84

NLS Tanker 5 2 6 0 4 0.00 40.00

Livestock Carrier 36 35 282 4 26 11.11 97.22

Table 9- Inspection Data by Ship Type

Heavy Load 1 1 5 0 1 0.00 100.00

Gas Carrier 56 25 103 0 39 0.00 44.64

Combination Carrier 7 3 15 0 5 0.00 42.86

Bulk Carrier 1,737 795 4,917 53 1,417 3.05 45.77

TYPE OF SHIP NU

MB

ER

OF

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

Vehicle Carrier 6 5 24 0 4 0.00 83.33

ALL TYPES OF SHIPS 5,066 2,845 18,266 229 3,761 4.52 56.16

Special Purpose Ship 1 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.00

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

% O

F IN

SP

EC

TIO

NS

WIT

H D

EFI

CIE

NC

IES

DETE

NTI

ON

PER

CEN

TAG

E

NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H

DETE

NTI

ON

S

NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

NU

MB

ER

OF

IND

IVID

UA

L S

HIP

S

INS

PEC

TED


18

Life-saving Appliances 2,657 105 9 14.55 12.77 21.95

Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery 1,093 31 0 5.98 3.77 0.00

Safety of Navigation 3,112 140 2 17.04 17.03 4.88

Dangerous Goods 42 0 0 0.23 0.00 0.00

SOLAS Fire Safety 1,846 99 10 10.11 12.04 24.39

Alarms 72 10 1 0.39 1.22 2.44

Radio Communications 855 36 0 4.68 4.38 0.00

Cargo Operations Including Equipment 141 2 0 0.77 0.24 0.00

Emerceny Systems 960 110 2 5.26 13.38 4.88

Alarm Signals 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00

Structural Conditions 1,173 67 8 6.42 8.15 19.51

ISM 443 68 5 2,43 8.27 12.20

Living Conditions 261 5 1 1.43 0.61 2.44

Anti Fouling 1 0 0 0.01 0.00 0.00

MARPOL Annex I 293 21 0 1.60 2.55 0.00

Table 10- Inspection Data by Type of Deficiencies

Documents Ship Certificates 579 37 2 3.17 4.50 4.88

Certificates Crew Certificates 202 32 0 1.11 3.89 0.00

and Documents 1,171 7 0 6.41 0.85 0.00

CATEGORY OF DEFICIENCIES NO

. O

F R

O R

ELA

TED

DETA

INA

BLE

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

Annex VI 19 0 0 0.10 0.00 0.00

Operational Deficiencies 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00

Prevention Annex IV 52 2 0 0.28 0.24 0.00

Annex V 178 2 0 0.97 0.24 0.00

Annex II 11 0 0 0.06 0.00 0.00

Pollution Annex III 6 0 0 0.03 0.00 0.00

NO

. O

F D

ETA

INA

BLE

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

% O

F TO

TAL

RO

RELA

TED

DETA

INA

BLE

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

% O

F TO

TAL

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

NU

MB

ER

OF

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

% O

F TO

TAL

DETA

INA

BLE

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

Accommodation, Recreational 198 4 0 1.08 0.49 0.00

Health Protection, Medical Care, Social Security 1,572 18 0 8.61 2.19 0.00

ILO/MLC Minimum Requirements for Seafarers 6 0 0 0.03 0.00 0.00

Conditions of Employment 30 6 0 0.16 0.73 0.00

Working Conditions 1,132 19 1 6.20 2.31 2.44

Other 161 1 0 0,88 0.12 0.00

TOTAL 18,266 822 41 100 100 100

RUSSIAN 69.23 70.27 69.38 5.08 6.47 6.14 5.78 6.88 7.00 59.44 68.55 78.84

FEDERATION (1)

UKRAINE 2423 2680 896 1371 1553 1378 1536 1664 1556 764 599 555 10 8 10

UKRAINE 49.74 36.00 35.67 0.65 0.48 0.64 0.73 0.52 0.65 56.58 57.95 68.29

Detention Percentage 2.97 4.36 4.52

Number of Detentions 151 218 229

Number of Inspections with Deficiencies 3051 2825 2845

RUSSIAN 2155 2035 1938 1281 1395 1528 1456 1638 1809 1008 1151 1255 74 106 111

FEDERATION (1)

GEORGIA 826 783 674 353 320 337 369 339 474 208 202 218 11 16 14

GEORGIA 56.37 59.59 45.99 2.98 4.72 2.95 3.12 5.00 4.15 42.74 40.87 50.00

MARITIME % OF INSPECTIONS DETENTION DETENTION INSPECTION

AUTHORITY WITH DEFICIENCIES PERCENTAGE RATE (2) RATE (3)

MARITIME NO. OF INDIVIDUAL NO. OF INDIVIDUAL NUMBER OF NO. OF INSPECTIONS NUMBER OF

AUTHORITY SHIP VISIT SHIP INSPECTED INSPECTIONS WITH DEFICIENCIES DETENTIONS

2014 2015 2016 2014 2015 2016 2014 2015 2016 2014 2015 2016 2014 2015 2016


19

Statistical Data 2014-2016

Summary

Inspection Data by Authority 2014-2016

Average Number of Deficiencies per Inspection 3.60 3.62 3.61

% of Inspections with Deficiencies 59.9 56.53 56.16

Number of Deficiencies Observed 18350 18094 18266

2014 2015 2016

Number of Inspections 5092 4997 5066

TURKEY (1) 1027 1055 1041 394 341 324 462 397 374 274 267 226 15 35 21

BULGARIA 1461 1335 1346 464 356 342 494 367 351 333 222 228 17 8 14

ROMANIA 1987 1860 1780 729 565 481 775 592 502 464 384 363 24 45 59

2014 2015 2016 2014 2015 2016 2014 2015 2016 2014 2015 2016

TURKEY (1) 59.31 67.25 60.43 3.25 8.82 5.61 3.81 9.97 6.17 38.36 32.32 31.12

BULGARIA 67.41 60.49 64.96 3.44 2.18 3.99 3.66 2.25 4.09 31.76 26.67 25.41

ROMANIA 59.87 64.86 72.31 3.10 7.60 11.75 3.29 7.61 12.06 36.69 30.38 27.02

(1) Data only for the Black Sea Ports(2) Individual ships detained as per cent of individual ships inspected(3) Individual ships inspected as per cent of number of individual ships visited

Antigua and Barbuda 96 1.9% 119 2.4% 107 2.1% 2.1%

Cook Islands 101 2.0% 103 2.1% 126 2.5% 2.2%

Russian Federation 320 6.3% 257 5.1% 255 5.0% 5.5%

Turkey 437 8.6% 420 8.4% 427 8.4% 8.5%

Malta 636 12.5% 625 12.5% 620 12.2% 12.4%

Other Special Activities 50 1.0% 28 0.5% 14 0.3% 0.6%

Livestock Carrier 36 0.7% 45 0.9% 36 0.7% 0.8%

Gas Carrier 63 1.2% 94 1.8% 56 1.1% 1.4%

Chemical Tanker 296 5.8% 366 7.2% 347 6.9% 6.7%

Bulk Carrier 1532 30.1% 1709 33.6% 1.737 34.8% 32.8%

Others 1900 37.3% 1757 35.2% 1743 34.4% 4.4%


20

TOTALS 5092 4997 5066

Tugboat 25 0.5% 22 0.4% 25 0.5% 0.5%

Ro-Ro Cargo 103 2.0% 77 1.5% 53 1.1% 1.5%

Container 162 3.2% 152 3.0% 157 3.1% 3.1%

Oil Tanker 558 11.0% 571 11.2% 666 13.3% 11.8%

2014 2014 2015 2015 2016 2016 2014-2016

SHIP TYPE SHARE SHARE SHARE SHARE

General Cargo / Multipurpose 2129 41.8% 1834 36.0% 1.910 38.2% 38.8%

Inspection by Ship Types (in the order of 2016 top 10 inspections)

Inspection by Ship Flag (in the order of 2016 top 10 inspections)

TOTALS 5092 4997 5066

Moldova, Republic of 179 3.5% 141 2.8% 123 2.4% 2.9%

Singapore 121 2.4% 131 2.6% 143 2.8% 2.6%

Liberia 376 7.4% 411 8.2% 383 7.6% 7.7%


2014 2014 2015 2015 2016 2016 2014-2016

FLAG SHARE SHARE SHARE SHARE

Panama 626 12.3% 664 13.3% 697 13.8% 13.1%

Other Special Activities 3 2.0% 1 0.5% 1 0.4% 0.8%

Livestock Carrier 1 0.7% 8 3.7% 4 1.7% 2.2%

Gas Carrier 1 0.7% 2 0.9% 0 0.0% 0.5%

Chemical Tanker 3 2.0% 2 0.9% 6 2.6% 1.8%

Bulk Carrier 28 18.5% 51 23.4% 53 23.1% 22.1%

Other 7 4.6% 29 4.6% 8 3.5% 7.4%

Ukraine 4 2.6% 7 3.2% 3 1.3% 2.3%

Togo 8 5.3% 9 4.1% 14 6.1% 5.2%

Sierra Leone 1 0.7% 6 2.8% 9 4 2.6%

Saint Kitts and Nevis 3 2.0% 4 1.8% 5 2.2% 2.0%

Philippines 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.9% 0.3%

Palau 1 0.7% 9 4.1% 5 2.2% 2.5%

Moldova, Republic of 18 11.9% 18 8.3% 21 9.2% 9.5%

Malta 10 6.6% 7 3.2% 7 3.1% 4.0%

Iran, Islamic Republic of 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.9% 0.3%

Congo, the Democratic Republic of the 2 0.9% 0.3%

Comoros 6 4.0% 3 1.4% 10 4.4% 3.2%

Belize 6 4.0% 4 1.8% 4 1.7% 2.3%


21

Vanuatu 2 1.3% 1 0.5% 2 0.9% 0.8%

Turkey 14 9.3% 32 14.7% 39 17.0% 14.2%

Tanzania, United Republic of 8 5.3% 12 5.5% 12 5.2% 5.4%

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 4 2.6% 6 2.8% 2 0.9% 2.0%

Russian Federation 8 5.3% 22 10.1% 12 5.2% 7.0%

Panama 22 14.6% 22 10.1% 34 14.8% 13.0%

Mongolia 0 0.0% 3 1.4% 2 0.9% 0.8%


TOTALS 151 218 229

Tugboat 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 3 1.3% 0.7%

Other Types of Ship 4 2.6% 14 6.4% 2 0.9% 3.3%

Ro-Ro Cargo 10 6.6% 12 5.5% 7 3.1% 4.8%

Container 2 1.3% 2 0.9% 2 0.9% 1.0%

Oil Tanker 5 3.3% 6 2.8% 5 2.2% 2.7%

2014 2014 2015 2015 2016 2016 2014-2016

SHIP TYPE SHARE SHARE SHARE SHARE

General Cargo / Multipurpose 94 62.3% 119 54.6% 146 63.8% 60.0%

Detentions by Ship Types (in the order of 2016 top 10 inspections)

Detentions by Ship Flag (more than 1 detentions in 2016)

TOTALS 151 218 229

Liberia 5 3.3% 4 1.8% 7 3.1% 2.7%

Cook Islands 5 3.3% 2 0.9% 8 3.5% 2.5%

Congo 3 1.3% 0.5%

Cambodia 14 9.3% 13 6.0% 6 2.6% 5.5%

2014 2014 2015 2015 2016 2016 2014-2016

FLAG SHARE SHARE SHARE SHARE

Antigua and Barbuda 1 0.7% 1 0.5% 3 1.3% 0.8%

Life-saving Appliances 2509 13.67 2604 14.39 2657 14.55

Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery 765 4.17 984 5.44 1093 5.98

Safety of Navigation 3317 18.08 3161 17.47 3112 17.04

Dangerous Goods 36 0.20 60 0.33 42 0.23

SOLAS Fire Safety 1568 8.54 1811 10.01 1846 10.11

Alarms 46 0.25 43 0.24 72 0.39

Radio Communications 938 5.11 868 4.80 855 4.68

Cargo Operations Including Equipment 51 0.28 65 0.36 141 0.77

Emerceny Systems 745 4.06 933 5.16 960 5.26

Alarm Signals 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Structural Conditions 1366 7.44 1161 6.42 1173 6.42


22

ISM 523 2,85 584 3.23 443 2.43

Living Conditions 326 1.78 395 2.18 261 1.43

Anti Fouling 4 0.02 0 0.00 1 0.01

MARPOL Annex I 285 1.55 251 1.39 293 1.60

Documents Ship Certificates 898 4.89 727 4.02 579 3.17

CATEGORY OF DEFICIENCIES

Certificates Crew Certificates 347 1.89 240 1.33 202 1.11

and Documents 1395 7.60 1157 6.39 1171 6.41

Annex VI 24 0.13 18 0.10 19 0.10

Operational Deficiencies 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Prevention Annex IV 69 0.38 73 0.40 52 0.28

Annex V 214 1.17 200 1.11 178 0.97

Annex II 11 0.06 3 0.02 11 0.06

Pollution Annex III 3 0.02 6 0.03 6 0.03

Number

2014 2015 2016

Number Number% %%

Accommodation, Recreational 88 0.48 102 0.56 198 1.08

Health Protection, Medical Care, Social Security 1088 5.93 1062 5.87 1572 8.61

ILO/MLC Minimum Requirements for Seafarers 7 0.04 4 0.02 6 0.03

Conditions of Employment 37 0.20 26 0.14 30 0.16

Working Conditions 1559 8.50 1445 7.99 1132 6.20

Other 131 0.71 111 0.61 161 0.88

TOTAL 19168 18094 18266

Major Category of Deficiencies 2014-2016

TOTALS 18350 18094 18266

Others 3832 20.9% 2908 16.1% 2695 14.75% 17.2%

Health Protection, Medical Care, 1088 5.9% 1062 5.9% 1572 8.61% 6.8%

Social Security

Lifebuoys Incl. Provision and Emergency, Lighting Batteries Lifebuoys Incl. Provision andDisposition 475 (2.59%) and Switches 461 (2.55%) Disposition 470 (2.57%)

Lifeboat 641 (3.49%) Nautical Publication 607 (3.35%) Lights, Shapes, Sound-Signals600 (3.28%)

Radio Communications 938 5.1% 868 4.8% 855 4.68% 4.9%

Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery 765 4.2% 984 5.4% 1093 5.98% 5.2%

Certificate & Documentation/Documents 1395 7.6% 1157 6.4% 1171 6.41% 6.8%

Working Conditions 1559 8.5% 1445 8.0% 1132 6.20% 7.6%

Life Saving Appliances 2509 13.7% 2604 14.4% 2657 14.55% 14.2%

Emergency, Lighting Batteries Lifebuoys Incl. Provision and Emergency, Lighting, Batteriesand Switches 451 (2.46%) Disposition 453 (2.50%) and Switches 450 (2.46%)

Charts 495 (2.70%) Lights Shapes Sound-Signals Nautical Publications 579 (3.17%)564 (3.12%)

Nautical Publication 689 (3.75%) Lifeboat 678 (3.75%) Lifeboats 627 (3.43%)

2014 2015 2016


23

Emergency Systems 745 4.1% 933 5.2% 960 5.26% 4.8%

Structural Conditions 634 3.5% 1161 6.4% 1173 6.42% 5.4%

Fire Safety 1568 8.5% 1811 10.0% 1846 10.11% 9.6%

2014 2014 2015 2015 2016 2016 2014-2016

DEFICIENCIES BY CATEGORY SHARE SHARE SHARE SHARE

Safety of Navigation 3317 18.1% 3161 17.5% 3112 17.04% 17.5%

Major Deficiencies by Category (in the order 2016 top 10)

Top 5 Deficiencies 2014-2016

All Other Deficiencies 10 33.3% 10 21.3% 3 7.3% 19.5%

TOTALS 30 47 41


Emergency Systems 46 9.1% 109 14.9% 110 13.4% 12.9%

Fire Safety 2 6.7% 3 6.4% 10 24.4% 12.7%

Emerceny Systems 0 0.0% 1 2.1% 2 4.9% 2.5%

ISM 4 13.3% 4 8.5% 5 12.2% 11.0%

Living Conditions 1 0.2% 5 0.7% 5 0.6% 0.5%

Working Conditions 33 6.5% 18 2.5% 19 2.3% 3.4%


Fire Safety 52 10.3% 92 12.5% 99 12.0% 11.8%

Hull Damage Impairing Emergency, Lighting, Batteries Charts 32 (3.89%)Seaworthiness 19 (3.75%) and Switches 28 (3.81%)

Other (ISM) 20 (3.95%) Charts 30 (4.09%) Other (ISM) 41 (4.99%)


24


Ship Certificates 1 3.3% 8 17.0% 2 4.9% 9.3%

RO RELATED DETAINABLE 2014 2014 2015 2015 2016 2016 2014-2016

DEFICIENCIES BY CATEGORY SHARE SHARE SHARE SHARE


Major RO Related Detainable Deficiencies by Category 2014-2016 (in the order 2016 top 5)

Voyage Data Recorder (VDR / Simplified Emergency Fire Pump and Its Emergency Fire Pump andVoyage Data Recorder (S-VDR) Pipes 25 (3.41%) Its Pipes 29 (3.53%)15 (2.96%)

Emergency Fire Pump and Other (ISM) 29 (3.95%) Lifeboats 34 (4.14%)Its Pipes 20 (3.95%)

Lifeboats 34 (6.72%) Lifeboats 46 (6.27%) Nautical Publications46 (5.60%)

2014 2015 2016

TOTALS 506 734 822

Alarms 3 0.6% 4 0.5% 10 1.2% 0.8%

Others 124 24.5% 130 17.7% 162 19.7% 20.2%

Certificate & Documentation/Ship Certificates 15 3.0% 46 6.3% 37 4.5% 4.8%

ISM 44 8.7% 54 7.4% 68 8.3% 8.1%


DETAINABLE DEFICIENCIES 2014 2014 2015 2015 2016 2016 2014-2016

BY CATEGORY SHARE SHARE SHARE SHARE


Major Detainable Deficiencies by Category 2014-2016 (in the order 2016 top 10)

Top 5 Detainable Deficiencies 2014-2016

Launching Arrangements for Pumping Piping and Discharge Doors 3 (7.32%)Survival Craft 2 (6.67%) Arrangements 3 (6.38%)

Hull - Corrosion 2 (6.67%) Ventilators Air Pipes Casings Lifeboats 4 (9.76%)3 (6.38%)


25

Safety Management Certificate Safety Management Certificate Ventilators, Air pipes, Casings(SMC/ISM Code) 1 (3.33%) (SMC/ISM Code) 2 (4.26%) 3 (7.32%)

Ventilators Air Pipes, Casings Rescue Boats 3 (3.68%) Documentation-ISM 4 (9.76%)2 (6.67%)

Covers (Hatchway-. Portable-. Ballast. Fuel and Other Tanks Fire Doors / Openings inTarpaulins. etc.) 3 (10.00%) 3 (6.38%) Fire-Resisting Divisions 4 (9.76%)

2014 2015 2016

RO Related Detainable Deficiencies 2014-2016

Top 5 MLC Deficiencies 2014-2016

Top 5 MLC Detainable Deficiencies 2014-2016

Electrical 92 (7.2%) Anchoring Devices 80 (6.3%) Records of Rest 141 (6.94%)

Lighting (Working Spaces) Ropes and Wires Access / Structural Features228 (17.8%) 238 (18.7%) (Ship) 334 (16.43%)

Anchoring Devices (3 (6.5%) Electrical 78 (6.2%) Electrical 130 (6.39%)

Ropes and Wires 198 (15.4%) Lighting (Working Spaces) Ropes and Wires200 (15.7%) 275 (13.53%)

Access / Structural Features (Ship) Access / Structural Features (Ship) Lighting (Working Spaces) 285 (22.3%) 284 (22.3%) 358 (17.61%)

2014 2015 2016

Seafarers' Employment Agreement Maritime Labour Certificate Wages 3 (7.14%)2 (8.3%) 2 (5.9%)

Ropes and Wires 2 (8.3%) Calculation and Payment of Cleanliness of Engine Room Wages 2 (5.9%) 3 (7.14%)Heating, Air Conditioning and Access / Structural Features Ventilation 2 (5.9%) (Ship) 3 (7.14%)Electrical 2 (5.9%) Cleanliness ofEngine Room 2 (5.9%)

Calculation and Payment of Wages Ropes and Wires 5 (14.1%) Manning Specified by the Minimum 3 (12.5%) Safe Manning Doc 5 (11.90%)

Lighting (Working Spaces) 2 (8.3%) Legal Documentation on Work and Anchoring Devices 3 (7.14%)Rest Hours 2 (5.9%)

Manning Specified by the Minimum Seafarers' Employment Agreement Seafarers' Employment AgreementSafe Manning Doc 2 (8.3%) 4 (11.8%) (SEA) 4 (9.52%)

Wages 8 (33.3%) Wages 5 (14.7%) Ropes and Wires 6 (14.29%)

2014 2015 2016

SHIP FLAGNUMBER OF

INSPECTIONS

NUMBER OF

DEFICIENCIES

NUMBER OF

DETENTIONS

NUMBER OF DETAINABLE

DEFICIENCIES

NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS

WITH DEFICIENCIES


26

Inspection Detention Deficiency Data by Ship Flag 2014-2016

Algeria

Antigua and Barbuda

Austria

Azerbaijan

Bahamas

Bahrain

Bangladesh

Barbados

Belgium

Belize

Bermuda (GB)

Bolivia

Bulgaria

Cambodia

Cayman Islands (GB)

China

Comoros

Congo

Congo, the Democratic Republic of the

Cook Islands

Croatia

Curacao

Cyprus

Denmark

Dominica

Egypt

Ethiopia

Faroe Islands

Finland

France

Georgia

Germany

Gibraltar (GB)

Greece

Honduras

Hong Kong, China

India

Indonesia

Iran, Islamic Republic of

Ireland

Isle of Man (GB)

Israel

Italy

Jamaica

Japan

Kazakhstan

Kiribati

Korea, Republic of

Kuwait

3

322

1

12

337

1

9

33

17

370

4

8

51

344

29

71

198

29

27

330

22

9

162

65

4

47

9

2

1

6

10

6

68

414

2

512

19

1

24

2

72

5

232

1

5

1

6

20

2

8

1017

3

40

777

4

64

114

15

1944

6

100

188

2606

75

69

1350

246

192

1529

28

48

343

223

22

257

30

2

0

14

34

22

156

495

31

836

36

10

138

3

162

31

373

0

0

5

47

58

2

0

5

0

0

5

0

1

0

0

14

0

0

3

33

0

1

19

3

2

15

0

0

4

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

2

1

3

1

0

2

0

2

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

0

3

176

1

4

147

1

6

24

6

299

2

7

32

314

10

14

167

24

21

254

5

7

65

43

3

37

6

1

0

2

7

4

35

108

2

166

7

1

12

1

28

2

86

0

0

1

6

10

1

0

13

0

0

12

0

2

0

0

57

0

0

6

138

0

2

75

12

5

56

0

0

7

0

0

3

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

3

13

3

3

0

8

0

3

0

1

0

0

0

5

1

0


27

SHIP FLAGLatvia

Lebanon

Liberia

Libyan Arab Jamahiriya

Lithuania

Luxembourg

Malaysia

Malta

Marshall Islands

Micronesia, Federated States of

Moldova, Republic of

Mongolia

Montenegro

Netherlands

Norway

Pakistan

Palau

Panama

Philippines

Poland

Portugal

Qatar

Romania

Russian Federation

Saint Kitts and Nevis

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Samoa

Saudi Arabia

Sierra Leone

Singapore

South Africa

Spain

Sri Lanka

Switzerland

Syrian Arab Republic

Taiwan, Province of China

Tanzania, United Republic of

Thailand

Togo

Tunisia

Turkey

Tuvalu

Ukraine

United Arab Emirates

United Kingdom

United States

Vanuatu

Vietnam

TOTAL

Inspection Detention Deficiency Data by Ship Flag 2014-2016 (Continue)

NUMBER OF

INSPECTIONS

NUMBER OF

DEFICIENCIES

NUMBER OF

DETENTIONS

NUMBER OF DETAINABLE

DEFICIENCIES

NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS

WITH DEFICIENCIES

1

43

1171

20

10

6

4

1882

1112

5

443

26

8

221

77

2

116

1987

35

1

42

3

1

832

169

181

1

1

242

395

1

1

2

30

13

1

237

33

277

5

1284

31

109

1

68

4

93

5

15157

3

218

2899

24

8

17

3

4081

2372

22

3357

197

8

371

137

2

860

7518

99

1

150

10

1

2888

853

986

23

0

1492

880

0

0

15

69

52

0

2308

89

2235

19

5165

188

638

0

203

3

448

49

54714

0

3

16

0

0

0

0

24

15

1

57

5

0

0

1

0

15

78

2

0

1

0

0

42

12

12

0

0

16

4

0

0

0

1

0

0

32

0

31

0

85

2

14

0

1

0

5

1

598

1

35

524

5

3

3

1

835

482

5

403

21

2

84

25

1

96

1192

20

1

26

1

1

542

123

134

1

0

210

181

0

0

2

15

8

0

229

17

259

3

848

23

84

0

36

1

77

5

8723

0

9

23

0

0

0

0

45

21

4

262

30

0

0

2

0

74

258

5

0

2

0

0

124

36

47

0

0

65

10

0

0

0

4

0

0

172

0

158

0

198

5

57

0

1

0

15

2

2062

RECOGNIZED

ORGANIZATION

NUMBER OF

INSPECTIONS

NUMBER OF

RO RELATED

DETAINABLE

DEFICIENCIES

NUMBER OF

RO RELATED

DETENTIONS

NUMBER OF

DEFICIENCIES

NUMBER OF

DETENTIONS

NUMBER OF

DETAINABLE

DEFICIENCIES

NUMBER OF

INSPECTIONS

WITH

DEFICIENCIES


28

RO Inspection Deficiency and Detention Data 2014-2016

Alpha Register of Shipping

American Bureau of Shipping

American Register of Shipping

ASIA Classification Society

Belize Register Corporation

Biro Klasifikasi Indonesia

Black Sea Bureau of Shipping

Bulgarian Register of Shipping

Bureau Securitas

Bureau Veritas

China Classification Society

Columbus American Register

Compania Nacional de Registro e

Inspeccion de Naves,S.de R.L.

CR Classification Society

Croatian Register of Shipping

Cyprus Bureau of Shipping

Det Norske Veritas

DNV GL AS

Dromon Bureau of Shipping

Fidenavis S.A.

Germanischer Lloyd

Global Marine Bureau Inc.

Global Shipping Bureau Inc

Global Shipping Class Inc.

Guardian Bureau of Shipping (GBS)

Hellenic Register of Shipping

Honduras International Surveying and

Inspection Bureau

Honduras Maritime Inspection Inc.

Indian Register of Shipping

Inspeccion y Clasificacion Maritima

(INCLAMAR)

Intermaritime Certification Services,

ICS Class

International Maritime Register

International Naval Surveys Bureau

International Register of Shipping

International Ship Classification

Iranian Classification Society

Isthmus Bureau of Shipping, S.A.

1563

33

4

1

1

1

242

9

2691

335

40

4

7

2

28

2

1008

1869

426

9

2

1040

89

24

1

14

14

3

20

13

84

17

384

277

23

12

93

2

0

0

0

0

0

4

0

1

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

8

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

17

0

0

7

1

0

0

0

0

0

4

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

2

0

0

1

2982

111

50

11

10

8

1534

17

7370

426

400

18

76

8

59

6

1684

3745

2683

31

3

2974

722

120

7

104

45

31

61

144

576

159

2649

1995

161

17

578

20

3

1

0

0

0

22

0

68

3

5

0

2

0

1

0

5

19

29

0

0

18

8

1

1

2

1

1

1

2

10

3

33

29

2

0

8

45

14

2

0

0

0

114

0

134

4

39

0

15

0

1

0

22

42

119

0

0

51

38

2

2

8

5

13

3

5

36

15

125

107

5

0

21

617

17

4

1

1

1

206

4

1353

79

40

4

5

1

8

2

369

778

383

4

1

539

84

19

1

13

8

2

9

12

59

16

344

244

20

6

76


29

RO Inspection Deficiency and Detention Data 2014-2016 (Continue)

Note: Number of inspections and detentions are calculated corresponding to each recognized organization (RO) that issued

certificate(s) for a ship. In case that ship’s certificates were issued more than one ROs, the inspection and detention would be

counted to each of them.

RECOGNIZED

ORGANIZATION

NUMBER OF

INSPECTIONS

NUMBER OF

RO RELATED

DETAINABLE

DEFICIENCIES

NUMBER OF

RO RELATED

DETENTIONS

NUMBER OF

DEFICIENCIES

NUMBER OF

DETENTIONS

NUMBER OF

DETAINABLE

DEFICIENCIES

NUMBER OF

INSPECTIONS

WITH

DEFICIENCIES

4

221

2436

130

43

198

32

1

133

5

3059

1

2

301

54

5

33

32

2

54

42

202

127

707

1

2058

2

4

521

650

1

5

9

164

8

21632

0

0

0

14

0

14

4

0

0

0

5

0

0

4

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

4

0

0

0

6

0

0

16

0

0

0

0

6

0

115

0

0

0

2

0

3

1

0

0

0

3

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

3

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

2

0

36

12

568

5389

876

332

1758

197

0

785

8

9290

0

6

2255

377

17

160

210

4

246

256

1210

817

1780

2

7331

14

34

3346

2978

7

42

53

1691

69

73695

0

8

27

12

6

27

4

0

6

0

94

0

0

22

5

1

0

4

0

2

6

14

4

11

0

72

0

1

54

52

0

1

0

25

1

757

0

20

53

58

24

127

13

0

23

0

236

0

0

109

19

2

0

15

0

9

25

44

11

25

0

215

0

1

229

133

0

5

0

131

2

2516

3

107

1063

107

39

189

27

0

106

2

1630

0

1

260

44

3

30

25

2

38

37

165

104

333

1

1293

2

2

433

480

1

5

8

157

8

12035

Korea Classification Society

Korean Register of Shipping

Lloyd's Register

Macosnar Corporation

Maritime Bureau of Shipping

Maritime Lloyd (ML)

Mediterranean Shipping Register (MSR)

National Cargo Bureau Inc.

National Shipping Adjuster Inc.

New United International Marine Services Ltd.

Nippon Kaiji Kyokai

No Class

NV Unitas

Other

Overseas Marine Certification Services

Panama Bureau of Shipping

Panama Marine Survey and

Certification Services Inc.

Panama Maritime Documentation Services

Panama Maritime Surveyor Bureau Inc.

Panama Register Corporation

Panama Shipping Registrar Inc.

Phoenix Register of Shipping

Polski Rejestr Statkow

(Polish Register of Shipping)

RINA Services S.p.A.

Romanian Naval Register

Russian Maritime Register of Shipping

Russian River Register

Ship Classification of Malaysia

Shipping Register of Ukraine (SRU)

Turkish Lloyd

Union Bureau of Shipping

Universal Maritime Bureau Ltd

Universal Shipping Bureau Inc.

Venezuelan Register of Shipping

Vietnam Register

TOTAL

Ukraine Shipping Register of Ukraine (SRU) 101 1 0.99 -0.72

Tanzania, United Republic of Maritime Lloyd (ML) 111 3 2.70 0,99

Venezuelan Register of Shipping 25 1 4.00 2.29

Mediterranean Shipping Register (MSR) 26 1 3.85 2.14

Shipping Register of Ukraine (SRU) 131 1 0.76 -0.95

Moldova, Republic of Bulgarian Register of Shipping 79 3 3.80 2.09

Maritime Lloyd (ML) Tanzania, United Republic of 111 3 2.70 0.99

Mediterranean Shipping Register (MSR) Moldova, Republic of 26 1 3.85 2.14


30

TOTAL 995 17 1.71

Togo Dromon Bureau of Shipping 145 1 0.69 -1.02

Palau International Register of Shipping 64 1 1.56 -0.15

Comoros Bulgarian Register of Shipping 36 1 2.78 1.07

Cambodia International Register of Shipping 48 1 2.08 0.37

Shipping Register of Ukraine (SRU) 166 2 1.20 -0.50

FLAG STATE RECOGNIZED ORGANIZATION NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

(+/-

) EX

CES

SA

VER

AG

E 1

.71%

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H D

ETE

NTI

ON

S

DETE

NTI

ON

%

Flag Administrations with Very High Detention Index Level* with Corresponding RO Which Have VeryHigh RO Related Detention Index Level** 2014-2016

Venezuelan Register of Shipping Moldova, Republic of 25 1 4.00 2.29

Bulgarian Register of Shipping Comoros 79 3 3.80 2.09

RECOGNIZED ORGANIZATION FLAG STATE NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

(+/-

) EX

CES

SA

VER

AG

E 1

.71%

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H D

ETE

NTI

ON

S

DETE

NTI

ON

%Flag Administrations with Very High Detention Index Level with Corresponding ROs with an AverageDetention Percentage ≥ 1,71% 2014-2016

Venezuelan Register of Shipping 63 1 1.59 -0.12

* Detention Index Greater Than Two Times of the Regional Average Detention Index

** RO Related Detention Index Greater Than Two Times of the Regional Average RO Related Detention Index

BulgariaBulgarian Maritime Administration

Ministry of Transport and Communication9, Dyakon Ignatiy St., 1000 Sofia / Bulgaria

Tel: +359 2 930 0910 • Fax: +359 2 930 0920

e-mail: [email protected]

GeorgiaMaritime Transport Agency

Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia23, Ninoshvili Street, Batumi 6000 Georgia

Tel: +995 222 74925 • Fax: +995 222 73929


RomaniaRomanian Naval Authority

Constanta Port No.1 Gate 1-8700 Constanta / RomaniaTel: +40 241 61 6124 • Fax: +40 241 61 6229


Russian FederationDepartment of the State Policy for Maritime and River Transport, Ministry of Transport

1, bldg 1, Rozhdestvenska st., Moscow 109012 RussiaTel: +7 495 626 10 00 • Fax: +7 495 626 91 28, +7 495 626 99 60


TurkeyRepublic of Turkey

Directorate General for Regulation of Maritime and Inland Waters Ministry of Transport,Maritime Affairs and Communications

Hakkı Turayliç Cad. No: 5 Emek 06338 Ankara / TurkeyTel: + 90 312 203 10 00, +90 312 203 22 20 • Fax: +90 312 231 33 06

e-mail: [email protected] - [email protected]

UkraineState Service of Ukraine for Transport Safety

14 Peremohy Ave., Kyiv, 01135, UkraineTel: +380 44 351 44 01 • Fax: +380 44 351 44 44
