Upload
new-delhi-india
View
108
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Port related injury in laparoscopic surgery
Dr Krishan kantDNB(MAS), M.S, DNB, MNAMS
FIAGES, FMAS, FICLS
Advanced Laparoscopic and Bariatric surgeon at Central Railway Hospital
(Jabalpur)
Dr Kurt Semm-Therapeutic laparoscopy 1970s-Ovarian cyst enucleation1971-Laparoscopic appendectmy in1981 germany
Statistics in laparoscopy
- 50% of the trocar-related injuries to the bowel and vasculature are during the initial entry.
-30-50% of the bowel injuries and 15-50% of the vascular injuries are not diagnosed at the time of injury.4
-delay contributed to mortality rates of 3-30% for bowel and vascular injuries
WHY COMPLICATIONS?
Experience: 4 fold if > 100 cases
Complexity: 9 fold if more complex
Patient risk: As ASA increases so does
risk of complications.
(Fahlenkamp, D. et al.: J. Urol. 162: 765, 1999 – 2,407 cases) (Parsons, J. et al.: Urology: 63: 27, 2004 – 894 cases)
COMPLICATIONS
1. Entry
2. Pneumoperitoneum
3. Intraoperative
4. Postoperative
a. Early
b. Late
ABDOMINAL ACCESS INSTRUMENTS
Open Technique Closed
Technique
Hasson Cannula Veress Needle
Trocar
Sheath
Assemblies
Opti trocar
ENTRY
A good beginning is essential:“More than one half of the complications related to laparoscopy are related to the entry technique.”
Incidence: 0.3 – 1.0%
(Magrina, J. F.: Clin. Ob. and Gyn. 45: 469, 2002)(meta-analysis: 1,549,360 laparoscopic cases)
ENTRY INJURIES
Veress or Open?
Veress Open
Vascular injury: 0.08% 0.0%*
Bowel injury: 0.08% 0.05%
Gas embolism: 0.001% 0.0%
Death: 0.003% 0.0%
*p < .05; (Bonjer, H: Br. J. Surg. 84: 599, 1997) (N.B.: other prospective studies showed no difference!)
(n= 12,444) (n= 489,335)
Access Related Complications (0.03 – 1%)
• Extraperitoneal insertion • Vascular injury
– Abdominal wall vessels– Retroperitoneal vessels– Mesenteric vessels
• Visceral injury– Stomach, bowel, liver, spleen, bladder
1.VERESS NEEDLE
• The operator should feel or sense the needle passing through two distinct planes.
• The needle is advanced and withdrawn several times. If this is done easily and without obstruction, the tip is in proper position.
Veress placement
TRANSPERITONEAL STANDARD ENTRY
Veress needle:• Test needle prior to
placement.• Aspirate, irrigate, aspirate
(then irrigate)…drop test and advancement test. Needle rotation.
• “If in doubt, pull it out.” (High pressure and low flow, remove needle.)
Tip: Increase abdominal pressure to 15 mm Hg for initial trocar placement.
Insufflation
Set pressure cut off to at least 20-25mmHgStart at low flow (1L/min)Check gas entering at low pressure (<8mmHg)After 0.5L flow rate can be increasedInsufflate to pressure cut off (20-25mmHg)
1. Veress cont.....
The greater the gas bubble & abdominal wall tension the less the risk of bowel injury
Abdominal pressure= 8mmHg Abdominal pressure= > 15 mmHg
2.Primary trocar
2. Primary port cont....
Commonest problem - failed entry
Insertion of subumbilical Veress needle
Closed entry can still cause bowel injury, especially if adhesions are present
2. Primary port cont....
• An intra-abdominal pressure of >15mmHg should be achieved before inserting the primary trocar
• The distension pressure should be reduced to 12–15 mmHg once the insertion of the trocars is complete
Green-top Guideline. No. 49 May 2008(RCOG)
• The primary trocar should be inserted at 90 degrees to the skin, through the incision at the base of the umbilicus
• Once the laparoscope has been introduced it should be rotated through 360 degrees to check for any adherent bowel
Green-top Guideline. No. 49 May 2008(RCOG)
Trocar placement
Secondary ports are inserted under direct vision - an inadvertent injury from a secondary port could be considered negligent”
Principles
Avoid inferior epigastric vesselsAvoid bowel/vascular injuryMinimise hernia risk
3. Secondary ports
Round ligament
Obliterated umbilical artery
Rectus muscles
Mid-line
3. Secondary ports - Anatomy
• Secondary ports inserted under direct vision at right angles to the skin at 12-15 mmHg pneumoperitoneum
• Inferior epigastric vessels should be visualised laparoscopically prior to secondary port placement
• Once the trocar has pierced the peritoneum it should be angled towards the anterior pelvis
Green-top Guideline. No. 49 May 2008
Alternatives to closed umbilical entry considered:
If there is risk of umbilical adhesions - previous (midline) laparotomy
In very slim or morbidly obese womenFailed saline test or Veress insertion x2
Unsatisfactory closed Veress insufflation
Alternatives include:
Open entry – variations of Hassan technique Palmer’s point closed entry
4. Primary port – Alternatives
WHERE’S THE BEST PLACE?
Entry sites: 5! Umbilical
(Danger – IVC/Aorta)
(Palmer’s point) / Left MCL subcostal
(Danger – Liver or Liver/spleen)
Right AAL – 2 fingerbreadths above the iliac crest
(Danger – colon)(Don’t hesitate to go left when
you are operating right!)(McDonald, D., et al.: SLEPT 15:
325, 2005)
5.HALS and outcome
• principle of master slave manipulator.
• The da Vinci system
• The Zeus system
Complication-
• Not accurate precision
• Conversion take time.
6.Robotic Surgery
INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONSThe BIG 3:
1. Cardiac arrest
2. Vascular
3. Bowel
The others: Spleen, Liver, Pancreas, Bladder, Ureter, Diaphragm, Instrumentation, Oliguria
VASCULAR INJURY
Overview:
Incidence: 0.5 – 2.8%
Conversion: 50%
Mortality: 9-17%
Mechanism:
1. Veress needle: 38%
2. Trocar: 45%
3. Intraoperative: 17%
(Hashizume, M.: Japan. Surg. Endosc. 11: 1198, 1997; Chapron, C. M., J. Am. Coll. Surg. 185: 461, 1997; Mintz, M. :J. Reprod. Med. 18: 269, 1997; Yuzpe, A.: J. Reprod. Med. 35: 485, 1990; Magrina, J. : Clin. Obstet. and Gyn. 45 469, 2002; Parsons, J. et al.: Urology: 63: 27, 2004)
Complications
Vascular Injuries
Vessel Injury : • Larger vessels may be injured by trocar or veress
needle.• CO2 peritoneum may tamponade a large vessel
injury. • When pressure normalizes it starts bleeding. Management –( If veress injury) • Examine the course of large vessels. • Overlying peritoneum is opened with laproscopic
scissors or a CO2 laser. • Hematoma evacuated by alternate suction and
irrigation.(If Trocar injury) * Laprotomy is required if hematoma is expanding
or persistent bleeding.
TROCAR INJURY: ABDOMINAL WALLThe most common site is from the
inferior and superior epigastric vessels.
The overall incidence is 0.5%
Key point: Lateral ports should be at least 5.5-6 cm. off the midline to avoid the epigastric vessels.
(Hashizume, M.: Japan. Surg. Endosc. 11: 1198, 1997)
Epigastric Vessels injury –• Deep epigastric vessels most frequently injured in
laproscopic hysterectomy Management – By Tamponade – • Rotate second puncture sleave by 3600.• By Foley’s catheter• Bipolar cautery• Needle suturing • Small haemostate (Mosquito clamp)
Complications
Injury to Small Bowel :
Bowel - May be injured due to trocar or veress needle
If due to veress needle it is managed conservatively
Diagnosis - • The emanation of foul smelling gas through pneumo-peritoneal
needle is a helpful diagnostic sign.• There may be GI contents at the tip of needle.
Management – • Mini laprotomy and repair of perforation. • Laparoscopically it may be sutured of laparoscopic stapler (ENDO-
GIA) can be used. • Colostomy
Injury to Urinary Bladder :
Bladder - Injury caused by second puncture trocar usually .
Diagnosis : Appearance of gas and blood in Foley’s catheter bag.
Management – • Early detection is important. • Place an indwelling catheter for 7-10 days and
prophylactic antibiotics - If defect is larger.
Repaired by a figure of 8 suture through muscularis of bladder & second suture to close peritonium
* A water tight seal should be documented by filling bladder with indigo carmine dye solution.
Direct Coupling damage
Direct Coupling Damage
Exit techniques
Wound closure:
Proper closure of fascia within umbilical port site to prevent wound dehiscence or hernia
Avoid hernia risk by closing sheath:
- Midline port sites > 7mm
- Lateral port sites > 5 mm
Take home message
• 5.5-6 cm. off the midline to avoid the epigastric vessels*• “In order to operate fast, it is necessary to go slow.” G.
Vallancien • Think twice … cut once.• Liberal use of energy devices (harmonic, Ligasure)• Blunt ports• Abdominal inspection at 5 mm Hg: look for “rivulets –
red swirls”• Port removal under vision at 5 mm Hg • If bleeding is confined to the retroperitoneum, there may
be very little blood intraperitoneally or none at all (thus presenting as an expanding retroperitoneal hematoma)
• Usal et al, Surgical Endoscopy, 1998