Upload
cody-conley
View
217
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO GRANDE DO SULPONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL
SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK
GROUP OF STUDIES AND RESEARCH IN ETHICS AND HUMAN GROUP OF STUDIES AND RESEARCH IN ETHICS AND HUMAN RIGHTS - GEPEDHRIGHTS - GEPEDH
Municipalization of programs and services in open environment of
juvenile offenders in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
. Work Group
Paz Hummes, Alessandra; Giacomelli Henriques da Cunha, Liziane; Avila, Lisélen; Prado, Alessandra; da Silva Cunha, Debora Regina; Milani Leal, Graziela
CoordenaçãoProfa. Dra. Beatriz G. Aguinsky – PPGSS/PUCRS
Introduction
Previous researche(2009) = Previous researche(2009) = juvenile offenders deprived of juvenile offenders deprived of freedom - Rio Grande do Sul.freedom - Rio Grande do Sul.
New landmarks = Social Policies regulations
SINASE/SUAS
Adolescents in conflict with the law: trajectory in the Justice System and Socio-Educational Services
• Youth offenders – till the age of 18 years
Specialized Police Departmen for youth
Prosecutors Office for the youth
Juvenile Specialized Court
Socio-educational Measures/ Art. 112
Executor Service - Organ of Social Protection Policy CREAS-
Reference CenterSpecialized
What are the social and educational measures? (art. 112 / ECA)
Open environment social and educational measures
I - warning;II - the obligation to repair the damage;III - services to the community - PSC;IV - probation - LA.
Measures of freedom deprivation
V – inclusion in a Program of partial freedom;VI – deprivation of freedom;VII – Protection measures of art. 101, I a VI. (BRASIL, 1990, p. 22).
Regarding munipalization:The open environment measures shall happen at the
municipal level, in the community where adolescents live in order to strengthen family and community bonds
Responsibility of the State or Federal Government = funding and / or technical support(SINASE, 2006);
Municipalities should promote a municipal plan regardin socioeducationa measures for juvenile(SINASE, 2008).
Metodologia
• Different institutional arrangements of Programs/services in 9 cities
• Study of qualitative nature that also seek qualitative information that is quantifiable.
• The main techniques for collection, analysis and interpretation of data• is documentary analysis, interviews, questionnaires and content• analysis (BARDIN, 1977) . Quantifiable information is treated with simple
statistic method.
• Ethical Care - Approval of the Ethics Committee. All participants previously received information about research and about the voluntary nature of participation, signing consent form(TCLE).
Research Objectives
Conduct a situational diagnosis regarding
municipalized socio-educational measures in RS.
Analyze how the municipalization of programs and
services in open environment for juvenile offenders
is being carried out, considering the interface
between the parameters of SINASE e do SUAS.
Uruguaiana
Porto Alegre
São LeopoldoNovo Hamburgo
Caixas do Sul
Pelotas
Santa Maria
Santo Ângelo
Passo Fundo
Included Municipalities: same that participated in previous research of Freedom Deprivation (2009).
Inclusion Criteria: see the Socioeducational System as a whole.
• Adolescents: 42 participants. Interview based on a form;
• Managers of the Programs/services: 21 participants. Interview based on a form and use of a questionnaire;
• Key informants System Guarantee of Rights: judge, prosecutor, defender, manager of policy, delegate and expert adviser to CMDCA= 54 participants. Interview based on a form and use of a questionnaire
Sujeitos, Técnicas e Instrumentos
117 participants
Who are the adolescents in open environment services or programs?
Repeated offenses
LITTLE STUDY
SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Types of infractionsRobbery, theft,drug dealing,
injury
FAMILIESIN A SITUATION OF
SOCIALVULNERABILITY
Male
ADOLESCENTS
Program/Services and e the Rights Guarantee System
Little articulation = bureaucratization
of relations
“Our contact is always through letter, it has even
been discussed on the terms you may need to
meeting once a month with them, but was dropped
this proposal” Program Manager
Absence of Special Police Departments = institucional violence
‘’ We miss the action of the police, the teens
reported abuse by police. I do not know why she is
not used, we have no contact with the delegated”.
Program Manager
“We don’t have a specialized police, the teens are
received by the police of adults, and many do not
have the preparation, physical aggression occurs,
threat, and generally they are handcuffed, which
could not. It think the municipality fails.” Ptrogam
Manager
MUNICIPAL SOCIOEDUCATIONAL PLAN
MUNICÍPIOS: SITUAÇÃO: Caxias do Sul NÃO São Leopoldo NÃO Novo Hamburgo NÃO Santa Maria SIM Santo Ângelo NÃO Passo Fundo SIM Uruguaiana SIM
Pelotas NÃO Porto Alegre NÃONo = 6; yes = 3
Responsible agencies
MUNICIPALITIES SITUATION:
Caxias do Sul 4 CRAS/CREAS
São Leopoldo 1 CREAS
Santa Maria 1 CREAS (PSC) + ONG (LA)
Santo Ângelo 1 ONG – transition for CREAS 2011
Passo Fundo 1 CREAS
Uruguaiana 1 CREAS
Pelotas 1 CREAS
Porto Alegre 9 CREAS
Novo Hamburgo CREAS
Situation of the Programs/services:
Technical team = incomplete “we are waiting for an hiring announcement about a year now” Program Manager
Records regarding adolescents = lack of information poor planing
“(...) these informations we don’t have” Program Manager
Quality of the services PIA/PAF = Invisible
“I don’t get any follow up here, nor my family” Adolescent
Knowledge on Social Policy /SINASE (2006/12)
“Some time ago I read the Sinase, the regulations do not remember, but I know its proposal” Program Manager
Educational sense of measure = replaced by punitive
“Here I wash, step machine and take away the garbage, sometimes there's nothing for me to do i am sitting in the corner” Adolescent
What adolescents have to suggest = think about what is
obvious and simple
“I wish they had more projects oriented to the future” Adolescent
“I think they could do something with the books I have here. They have so much and do nothing” Adolescente
Results
Municipalition of programs and services in open Municipalition of programs and services in open environment of juvenile offenders – RGS is in halfway = to environment of juvenile offenders – RGS is in halfway = to much to fullfill considering new Social Policies Landmarks much to fullfill considering new Social Policies Landmarks of SINASE and SUAS of SINASE and SUAS
- Beginning of this process = late 90’s and early 2000. Beginning of this process = late 90’s and early 2000.
- The implementation of the Unified Social Protection (SUAS) typifies this service as one to be performed at the Centers for Specialized Social Assistance Reference (CREAS) by qualified and interdisciplinary teams relying on social workers, psychologists and pedagogues, etc.. (SUAS, 2005)
Results
• The constitution of the technical staff has not yet been fully achieved in these services, as required by the new Brazilian legislation on the subject.
• We also found a lack of professionals to fulfill the demands of the services and a lack of training for the work specifically with socio-educational measures in an open environment.
Results• Regarding the management arrangements of the
services studied, we found that the local governments of Municipalities are primarily responsible for the services and in some cities there is shared responsibility with NGOs, and the municipalities are in a transition phase of the implementing agencies
• Regarding institutional arrangements, it was found that the promotion of human rights of adolescents is mostly fulfilled by social policies carried out for adolescents in general in the municipalities.
Results• The lack of knowledge regarding specific Social Policies
related with Socioeducational mesuares are related to poor planing and poor quality of services.
• The fragil integration between the net of Guarantee of Rights System and Social Protection Services contribute to bureacratization of services interving in the quality of the services
• In the absence of clear references, the socioeducational pourposes of the measures tend to be substitute by plain punitive sense in interventions, that lack of sense for the needs of adolescents
• Proposals – strengthen programs in the network system of guaranteed rights; training of professionals and managers; listening to the adolescents – they have much to propose
REFERÊNCIAS
BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. Rio de Janeiro. Edições 70, 1977.
BRASIL. Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente. Lei federal 8069/90.
BRASIL. Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate a Fome. Norma Operacional Básica NOB/SUAS. Brasília, jul, 2005. Disponível em: <http://www.congemas.org.br/NOBversaofinal.pdf>. Acesso em 03 mar. 2010.
CAO/IJ-Centro de Apoio Operacional das Promotorias de Justiça da Infância e da Juventude. Apontamentos sobre a política socioeducativas segundo as diretrizes. Estabelecidas no Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente,MINAS GERAIS, 2008.
SARAIVA, João Batista da Costa. Adolescente em conflito com a lei: da indiferença à proteção integral: uma abordagem sobre a responsabilidade penal juvenil. 3. ed. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2009
REFERÊNCIAS
SIMÕES, Carlos. Curso de Direito do Serviço Social. São Paulo: Cortez, 2007.
SISTEMA NACIONAL DE ATENDIMENTO SÓCIOEDUCATIVO - SINASE. Secretaria Especial dos Direitos Humanos. Brasília: CONANDA, 2006.